From these circumstances, I have thought that there is some

inconsistency in our common mode of teaching languages.[n] We are told

that it is proper to begin first with the Latin, and, having acquired

that, it will be more easy to attain those modern languages which are

derived from it; and yet we do not begin with the Greek in order more

easily to acquire the Latin. It is true that, if you can clamber and

get to the top of the staircase without using the steps, you will more

easily gain them in descending; but certainly, if you begin with the

lowest you will with more ease ascend to the top; and I would

therefore offer it to the consideration of those who superintend the

education of our youth, whether,--since many of those who begin with

the Latin quit the same after spending some years without having made

any great proficiency, and what they have learned becomes almost

useless, so that their time has been lost,--it would not have been

better to have begun with the French, proceeding to the Italian, etc.;

for, though, after spending the same time, they should quit the study

of languages and never arrive at the Latin, they would, however, have

acquired another tongue or two, that, being in modern use, might be

serviceable to them in common life.

After ten years' absence from Boston, and having become easy in my

circumstances, I made a journey thither to visit my relations, which I

could not sooner well afford. In returning, I called at Newport to see

my brother, then settled there with his printing house. Our former

differences were forgotten, and our meeting was very cordial and

affectionate. He was fast declining in his health, and requested of me

that, in case of his death, which he apprehended not far distant, I

would take home his son, then but ten years of age, and bring him up

to the printing business. This I accordingly performed, sending him a

few years to school before I took him into the office. His mother

carried on the business till he was grown up, when I assisted him with

an assortment of new types, those of his father being in a manner worn

out. Thus it was that I made my brother ample amends for the service I

had deprived him of by leaving him so early.

In 1736 I lost one of my sons, a fine boy of four years old, by the

smallpox, taken in the common way. I long regretted bitterly, and

still regret, that I had not given it to him by inoculation.[124]

This I mention for the sake of parents who omit that operation on the

supposition that they should never forgive themselves if a child died

under it; my example showing that the regret may be the same either

way, and that, therefore, the safer should be chosen.

Our club, the Junto, was found so useful, and afforded such

satisfaction to the members, that several were desirous of introducing

their friends, which could not well be done without exceeding what we

had settled as a convenient number, namely, twelve. We had from the

beginning made it a rule to keep our institution a secret, which was

pretty well observed. The intention was to avoid applications of

improper persons for admittance, some of whom, perhaps, we might find

it difficult to refuse. I was one of those who were against any

addition to our number, but, instead of it, made in writing a proposal

that every member separately should endeavor to form a subordinate

club, with the same rules respecting queries, etc., and without

informing them of the connection with the Junto. The advantages

proposed were the improvement of so many more young citizens by the

use of our institutions; our better acquaintance with the general

sentiments of the inhabitants on any occasion, as the Junto member

might propose what queries we should desire, and was to report to the

Junto what passed in his separate club; the promotion of our

particular interests in business by more extensive recommendation; and

the increase of our influence in public affairs and our power of doing

good by spreading through the several clubs the sentiments of the Junto.

The project was approved, and every member undertook to form his club,

but they did not all succeed. Five or six only were completed, which

were called by different names, as "The Vine," "The Union," "The

Band," etc. They were useful to themselves, and afforded us a good

deal of amusement, information, and instruction, besides answering, in

some considerable degree, our views of influencing the public opinion

on particular occasions, of which I shall give some instances in

course of time as they happened.

[Footnote 111: The following is taken from the commentary of Hierocles

upon the Golden Verses of Pythagoras. The English version is given by

Bigelow in his edition of the Autobiography:

"He [Pythagoras, who lived in the sixth century B.C.] requires also

that this examination be daily repeated. The time which he recommends

for this work is about even or bedtime, that we may conclude the

action of the day with the judgment of conscience, making the

examination of our conversation an evening song to God. Wherein have I

transgressed? What have I done? What duty have I omitted? So shall we

measure our lives by rules.

"We should have our parents and relations in high esteem, love and

embrace good men, raise ourselves above corporeal affections,

everywhere stand in awe of ourselves, carefully observe justice,

consider the frailty of riches and momentary life, embrace the lot

which falls to us by divine judgment, delight in a divine frame of

spirit, convert our mind to what is most excellent, love good

discourses, not lie open to impostures, not be servilely affected in

the possession of virtue, advise before action to prevent repentance,

free ourselves from uncertain opinions, live with knowledge, and

lastly, that we should adapt our bodies and the things without to the

exercise of virtue. These are the things which the lawgiving mind has

implanted in the souls of men."]

[Footnote 112: It is dated July 1, 1733.]

[Footnote 113: "O philosophy, thou guide of life! O thou searcher

after virtue and banisher of vice! One day lived well and in obedience

to thy precepts should be preferred to an eternity of sin."]

[Footnote 114: FRANKLIN'S NOTE.--Nothing so likely to make a man's

fortune as virtue.]

[Footnote 115: Thus far written at Passy, 1784.]

[Footnote 116: The Revolution.]

[Footnote 117: Almanacs were the first issues of the American press.

It is not easy in our day to understand their importance to the early

colonists, and their consequent popularity. The makers, philomaths

("lovers of learning") as Franklin called them, set out their wares in

every attractive form the taste and ingenuity of the age could devise.

They made them a diary, a receipt book, a jest book, and a weather

prophet, as well as a calendar book of dates. The household was poor

indeed which could not scrape up a twopence or a sixpence for the

annual copy. Once bought, it hung by the big chimney-piece, or lay

upon the clock shelf with the Bible and a theological tract or two. It

was read by the light that shone from the blazing logs of the

fireplace or the homemade tallow dip. Its recipes helped the mother in

her dyeing or weaving or cooking. Its warnings of "cold storms,"

"flurries of snow," cautioned the farmer against too early planting of

corn; and its perennial jokes flavored the mirth of many a corn

husking or apple paring.]

[Footnote 118: See p. 201.]

[Footnote 119: See pp. 193-200.]

[Footnote 120: A sheet printed on one side only and without

arrangement in columns.]

[Footnote 121: Statement.]

[Footnote 122: Departure from the faith held by the members of the

synod or assembly.]

[Footnote 123: "Pro and con," i.e., for and against.]

[Footnote 124: Vaccination was not at this time known. By inoculation

the smallpox poison was introduced into the arm, and produced a milder

form of the disease.]

§ 6. ENTERS PUBLIC LIFE.

My first promotion was my being chosen, in 1736, clerk of the General

Assembly. The choice was made that year without opposition; but the year

following, when I was again proposed, (the choice, like that of the

members, being annual,) a new member made a long speech against me, in

order to favor some other candidate. I was, however, chosen, which was

the more agreeable to me as, besides the pay for the immediate service

as clerk, the place gave me a better opportunity of keeping up an

interest among the members, which secured to me the business of printing

the votes, laws, paper money, and other occasional jobs for the public,

that, on the whole, were very profitable.

I therefore did not like the opposition of this new member, who was a

gentleman of fortune and education, with talents that were likely to

give him, in time, great influence in the House; which, indeed,

afterward happened. I did not, however, aim at gaining his favor by

paying any servile respect to him, but, after some time, took this

other method. Having heard that he had in his library a certain very

scarce and curious book, I wrote a note to him, expressing my desire

of perusing that book, and requesting he would do me the favor of

lending it to me for a few days. He sent it immediately, and I

returned it in about a week with another note, expressing strongly my

sense of the favor. When we next met in the House, he spoke to me

(which he had never done before), and with great civility; and he ever

after manifested a readiness to serve me on all occasions, so that we

became great friends, and our friendship continued to his death. This

is another instance of the truth of an old maxim I had learned, which

says: "He that has once done you a kindness will be more ready to do

you another than he whom you yourself have obliged." And it shows how

much more profitable it is prudently to remove, than to resent,

return, and continue, inimical proceedings.

In 1737, Colonel Spotswood, late governor of Virginia, and then

postmaster-general, being dissatisfied with the conduct of his deputy

at Philadelphia respecting some negligence in rendering and

inexactitude of his accounts, took from him the commission and offered

it to me. I accepted it readily, and found it of great advantage; for,

though the salary was small, it facilitated the correspondence that

improved my newspaper and increased the number demanded, as well as

the advertisements to be inserted, so that it came to afford me a

considerable income. My old competitor's newspaper declined

proportionably, and I was satisfied without retaliating his refusal,

while postmaster, to permit my papers being carried by the riders.

Thus he suffered greatly from his neglect in due accounting; and I

mention it as a lesson to those young men who may be employed in

managing affairs for others, that they should always render accounts

and make remittances with great clearness and punctuality. The

character of observing such a conduct is the most powerful of all

recommendations to new employments and increase of business.

I began now to turn my thoughts a little to public affairs, beginning,

however, with small matters. The city watch was one of the first

things that I conceived to want regulation. It was managed by the

constables of the respective wards in turn. The constable warned a

number of housekeepers to attend him for the night. Those who chose

never to attend, paid him six shillings a year to be excused, which

was supposed to be for hiring substitutes, but was, in reality, much

more than was necessary for that purpose, and made the constableship a

place of profit; and the constable, for a little drink, often got such

ragamuffins about him as a watch that respectable housekeepers did not

choose to mix with them.[n] Walking the rounds, too, was often

neglected, and most of the nights spent in tippling. I thereupon wrote

a paper to be read in Junto, representing these irregularities, but

insisting more particularly on the inequality of this six-shilling tax

of the constables respecting the circumstances of those who paid it,

since a poor widow housekeeper, all whose property to be guarded by

the watch did not perhaps exceed the value of fifty pounds, paid as

much as the wealthiest merchant, who had thousands of pounds' worth of

goods in his stores.

On the whole, I proposed as a more effectual watch the hiring of

proper men to serve constantly in that business; and as a more

equitable way of supporting the charge, the levying a tax that should

be proportioned to the property. This idea, being approved by the

Junto, was communicated to the other clubs, but as arising in each of

them; and though the plan was not immediately carried into execution,

yet, by preparing the minds of people for the change, it paved the way

for the law obtained a few years after, when the members of our clubs

were grown into more influence.

About this time I wrote a paper, (first to be read in Junto, but it

was afterward published,) on the different accidents and

carelessnesses by which houses were set on fire, with cautions against

them, and means proposed of avoiding them. This was much spoken of as

a useful piece, and gave rise to a project which soon followed it, of

forming a company for the more ready extinguishing of fires, and

mutual assistance in removing and securing of goods when in danger.

Associates in this scheme were presently found, amounting to thirty.

Our articles of agreement obliged every member to keep always in good

order, and fit for use, a certain number of leather buckets, with

strong bags and baskets (for packing and transporting of goods), which

were to be brought to every fire; and we agreed to meet once a month

and spend a social evening together, in discoursing and communicating

such ideas as occurred to us upon the subject of fires as might be

useful in our conduct on such occasions.

The utility of this institution soon appeared,[n] and many more

desiring to be admitted than we thought convenient for one company,

they were advised to form another, which was accordingly done; and

this went on, one new company being formed after another, till they

became so numerous as to include most of the inhabitants who were men

of property; and now, at the time of my writing this, though upward of

fifty years since its establishment, that which I first formed, called

the "Union Fire Company," still subsists and flourishes, though the

first members are all deceased but myself and one who is older by a

year than I am. The small fines that have been paid by members for

absence from the monthly meetings have been applied to the purchase of

fire engines, ladders, fire hooks, and other useful implements for

each company, so that I question whether there is a city in the world

better provided with the means of putting a stop to beginning

conflagrations; and, in fact, since these institutions, the city has

never lost by fire more than one or two houses at a time, and the

flames have often been extinguished before the house in which they

began, has been half consumed.

In 1739 arrived among us from Ireland the Rev. Mr. Whitefield,[125]

who had made himself remarkable there as an itinerant preacher. He was

at first permitted to preach in some of our churches; but the clergy,

taking a dislike to him, soon refused him their pulpits, and he was

obliged to preach in the fields. The multitudes of all sects and

denominations that attended his sermons were enormous, and it was

matter of speculation to me, who was one of the number, to observe the

extraordinary influence of his oratory on his hearers, and how much

they admired and respected him, notwithstanding his common abuse of

them by assuring them they were naturally "half beasts and half

devils." It was wonderful to see the change soon made in the manners

of our inhabitants. From being thoughtless or indifferent about

religion, it seemed as if all the world were growing religious, so

that one could not walk through the town in an evening without hearing

psalms sung in different families of every street.

And, it being found inconvenient to assemble in the open air, subject

to its inclemencies, the building of a house to meet in was no sooner

proposed, and persons appointed to receive contributions, but

sufficient sums were soon received to procure the ground and erect the

building, which was one hundred feet long and seventy broad, about the

size of Westminster Hall;[126] and the work was carried on with such

spirit as to be finished in a much shorter time than could have been

expected. Both house and ground were vested in trustees, expressly for

the use of any preacher of any religious persuasion who might desire

to say something to the people of Philadelphia; the design in building

not being to accommodate any particular sect, but the inhabitants in

general; so that even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a

missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at

his service.

Mr. Whitefield, in leaving us, went preaching all the way through the

colonies to Georgia. The settlement of that province had lately been

begun, but, instead of being made with hardy, industrious husbandmen,

accustomed to labor,--the only people fit for such an enterprise,--it

was with families of broken shopkeepers and other insolvent debtors,

many of indolent and idle habits, taken out of the jails, who, being

set down in the woods, unqualified for clearing land and unable to

endure the hardships of a new settlement, perished in numbers, leaving

many helpless children unprovided for.[127] The sight of their

miserable situation inspired the benevolent heart of Mr. Whitefield

with the idea of building an orphan house[128] there, in which they

might be supported and educated. Returning northward, he preached up

this charity, and made large collections, for his eloquence had a

wonderful power over the hearts and purses of his hearers, of which I

myself was an instance.

I did not disapprove of the design, but, as Georgia was then destitute

of materials and workmen, and it was proposed to send them from

Philadelphia at a great expense, I thought it would have been better

to have built the house here, and brought the children to it. This I

advised; but he was resolute in his first project, rejected my

counsel, and I therefore refused to contribute. I happened soon after

to attend one of his sermons, in the course of which I perceived he

intended to finish with a collection, and I silently resolved he

should get nothing from me. I had in my pocket a handful of copper

money, three or four silver dollars, and five pistoles in gold. As he

proceeded I began to soften, and concluded to give the coppers.

Another stroke of his oratory made me ashamed of that, and determined

me to give the silver; and he finished so admirably that I emptied my

pocket wholly into the collector's dish, gold and all. At this sermon

there was also one of our club, who, being of my sentiments respecting

the building in Georgia, and suspecting a collection might be

intended, had, by precaution, emptied his pockets before he came from

home. Toward the conclusion of the discourse, however, he felt a

strong desire to give, and applied to a neighbor who stood near him,

to borrow some money for the purpose. The application was

unfortunately to perhaps the only man in the company who had the

firmness not to be affected by the preacher. His answer was: "At any

other time, friend Hopkinson, I would lend to thee freely; but not

now, for thee seems to be out of thy right senses."

Some of Mr. Whitefield's enemies affected to suppose that he would

apply these collections to his own private emolument; but I, who was

intimately acquainted with him, being employed in printing his sermons

and journals, etc., never had the least suspicion of his integrity,

but am to this day decidedly of opinion that he was in all his conduct

a perfectly honest man; and methinks my testimony in his favor ought

to have the more weight as we had no religious connection. He used,

indeed, sometimes to pray for my conversion, but he never had the

satisfaction of believing that his prayers were heard. Ours was a mere

civil friendship, sincere on both sides, and lasted to his death.

The following instance will show something of the terms on which we

stood. Upon one of his arrivals from England at Boston, he wrote to me

that he should come soon to Philadelphia, but knew not where he could

lodge when there, as he understood his old friend and host, Mr.

Benezet, was removed to Germantown. My answer was: "You know my house;

if you can make shift with its scanty accommodations, you will be most

heartily welcome." He replied that if I made that kind offer for

Christ's sake I should not miss of a reward; and I returned: "Don't

let me be mistaken; it was not for Christ's sake, but for your own

sake." One of our common acquaintance remarked that, knowing it to be

the custom of the saints, when they received any favor, to shift the

burden of the obligation from off their own shoulders and place it in

heaven, I had contrived to fix it on earth.

The last time I saw Mr. Whitefield was in London, when he consulted me

about his orphan house concern, and his purpose of appropriating it to

the establishment of a college.

He had a loud and clear voice, and articulated his words and sentences

so perfectly that he might be heard and understood at a great

distance, especially as his auditors, however numerous, observed the

most exact silence. He preached one evening from the top of the

courthouse steps, which are in the middle of Market Street, and on the

west side of Second Street, which crosses it at right angles. Both

streets were filled with his hearers to a considerable distance. Being

among the hindmost in Market Street, I had the curiosity to learn how

far he could be heard, by retiring backward down the street toward the

river; and I found his voice distinct till I came near Front Street,

when some noise in that street obscured it. Imagining then a

semicircle, of which my distance should be the radius, and that it

were filled with auditors, to each of whom I allowed two square feet,

I computed that he might well be heard by more than thirty thousand.

This reconciled me to the newspaper accounts of his having preached to

twenty-five thousand people in the fields, and to the ancient

histories of generals haranguing whole armies, of which I had

sometimes doubted.

By hearing him often, I could distinguish easily between sermons newly

composed and those which he had often preached in the course of his

travels. His delivery of the latter was so improved by frequent

repetitions that every accent, every emphasis, every modulation of

voice, was so perfectly well turned and well placed that, without

being interested in the subject, one could not help being pleased with

the discourse; a pleasure of much the same kind with that received

from an excellent piece of music. This is an advantage itinerant

preachers have over those who are stationary, as the latter cannot

well improve their delivery of a sermon by so many rehearsals.

His writing and printing from time to time gave great advantage to his

enemies. Unguarded expressions and even erroneous opinions, delivered

in preaching, might have been afterward explained or qualified by

supposing others that might have accompanied them, or they might have

been denied; but _litera scripta manet_.[129] Critics attacked his

writings violently, and with so much appearance of reason as to

diminish the number of his votaries and prevent their increase; so

that I am of opinion if he had never written anything, he would have

left behind him a much more numerous and important sect, and his

reputation might in that case have been still growing, even after his

death; as, there being nothing of his writing on which to found a

censure and give him a lower character, his proselytes would be left

at liberty to feign for him as great a variety of excellences as their

enthusiastic admiration might wish him to have possessed.

My business was now continually augmenting, and my circumstances

growing daily easier, my newspaper having become very profitable, as

being for a time almost the only one in this and the neighboring

provinces. I experienced, too, the truth of the observation that

"after getting the first hundred pounds it is more easy to get the

second," money itself being of a prolific nature.

Franklin's Autobiography (Eclectic English Classics) · 第 9 / 17 段