ALFRED GATTY.

April 6. 1850.

[In Palmer's _Origines Liturgice_, vol. i. p. 241. (2d edit.),

we find the following note on the response, "_Quia_ non est

alius," &c.:--"Brev. Eboracens. fol. 264.; Brev. Sarisb. fol.

85." Bishop Lloyd remarks on this verse and response as

follows:--"I do not know what Burnet means by stating that this

response was made in the year 1549, on the occasion of political

occurrences, for this answer is found in all the foreign

breviaries, in the Salisbury primer, and in the primer of Hen.

VIII. See Burnet's _Hist. Ref._ p. ii. b. 1. anno 1549."]

_Yeoman._--This word, the origin of which Dr. Johnson says is much

doubted, in the general acceptation of it meaning signifies a small

farmer; though several authorities quoted by Johnson tend to show it

also signifies a certain description of servants, and that it is applied

also to soldiers, as Yeoman of the Guard. It is not, however, confined

to soldiers, for we hear of Yeoman of the Chamber; Yeoman of the Robes;

Yeoman of the Pantry; Yeoman Usher of the Black Rod.

I should be glad if any of your readers can give an explanation of the

word as used in the latter instances.

Notes and Queries, Number 27, May 4, 1850 · 第 52 / 96 题