SUBJECTS FOR COMPOSITIONS

The Story Told in This Picture.

The Lives of the French Peasants.

Comparison of Labor in Those Days and at the Present Time.

Millet’s Paintings—Subjects and Purpose.

Reasons Why I Would Consider This Picture a Masterpiece.

Life of the Artist.

=The story of the artist.= In the little country village of Gruchy,

France, dwelt a family of peasants who tilled the land and lived by the

sweat of their brows. There were the grandmother, father, mother, and

eight children. The eldest son was Jean François Millet, the artist who

painted this picture. His mother worked out in the fields with the

father, even as the women in this picture are working, so little Jean

François was brought up by his grandmother, who was also his godmother.

It was she who named him Jean for his father and François after the good

Saint Francis. She was a deeply religious woman, and almost the only

pictures Millet saw in his boyhood were those in the Bible, which he

copied again and again, drawing them upon the stone walls with white

chalk. This pleased the grandmother, and she encouraged him all she

could.

When Millet was six years old he was sent to school. At twelve he began

to study Latin with a priest in the village who was very fond of him and

taught him for the pleasure of it. From this time on his studies were

frequently interrupted by his work on the farm, for as eldest son he was

the one the father relied upon most.

The elder Millet had a keen appreciation of the beauty in nature and

often, as they worked, he would call his son’s attention to the beauties

around them. He would say, “Look at that tree—how large and beautiful!

It is as beautiful as a flower,” or “See, that house half buried by the

field is good; it seems to me that it ought to be drawn that way.” Then

sometimes he would try to model a figure from a piece of clay or cut an

animal or plant from wood. So it was not much wonder that the son, too,

tried to draw animals, the barn, the garden, and various objects around

him.

When he was eighteen years old he drew his first great picture. As he

was coming home from church he met an old man whose back was bent over a

cane as he walked slowly along. Something about the bent figure appealed

to Millet so strongly that he had a great desire to draw a portrait of

him. So, taking some charcoal from his pocket, he drew on a stone wall a

picture of the old man. People passing by recognized the old man in

Millet’s picture and were much pleased.

His father, too, was delighted, for he had once wished to be an artist

himself. He now resolved that his son should have a chance. A family

council was held and all agreed that Millet must be sent to some good

artist to study. So the father took him to an artist (Mouchel) in

Cherbourg to whom he showed some of Millet’s drawings. At first the

artist would not believe the boy had drawn them, but, finally convinced,

he was very glad to have this talented boy for his pupil.

Millet had studied with him only two months when his father died, and he

was obliged to return home to take his father’s place on the farm as

best he could. But the people of the village, who were much interested

in his paintings, resolved to help him. So they raised money to send him

back to Cherbourg to study, and finally to the great city of Paris.

There he studied under Delaroche, a fashionable painter of that day. The

other students could not understand Millet, for, peasant that he was, he

rarely spoke, allowing others to make all the advances and answering

scarcely a word. However, if they went too far he could use his fists to

such good advantage that they soon left him quite alone. He was always

known among them as “the man of the woods.”

They soon found out that he could draw and paint, too, and his work

received much praise. Still his pictures did not sell, and Millet’s life

in Paris was a continuous struggle with poverty.

One of the reasons that his pictures did not sell was because he chose

his models from the lower classes and represented them in their humble

daily tasks. His critics urged him to paint, instead, some beautiful

girl or fine-looking man from the village or city. To this he replied:

“Beauty does not dwell in the face; it radiates forth from the whole

figure and appears in the suitableness of the action to the subject.

Your pretty peasants would be ill suited for picking up wood, for

gleaning in the fields of August, for drawing water from a well. Beauty

is expression.”

In spite of the fact that he could barely earn a living in Paris, Millet

remained there many years. He was married and his children were born

there. Finally he left Paris with his wife and children and settled at

Barbizon, a small village in France, where he spent the rest of his

life. Many descriptions have been written and many pictures painted of

the modest white stone cottage in which Millet’s last years were spent.

It was not until these last few years of his life that Millet ceased to

be wretchedly poor, for then his pictures were at last appreciated and

he received the profit and honor that were his due.

He died at Barbizon, January 20, 1875.

The world of to-day has forgotten most of the popular artists of that

time, and their pretty models, but Millet’s peasants live on. Once

little valued, now the great truths which they represent have made them

almost priceless.

=Questions about the artist.= What is the artist’s full name? Tell about

his home life. Who took care of Millet when he was a child? What did his

mother do? Who named him, and why? What pictures did he study? When was

he sent to school? What did he study with the priest? Why were his

studies interrupted so often? How did his father help him with his

drawing? Tell about the old man with the cane. Who recognized his

portrait? What happened because of his success? Why did the artist think

Millet could not have painted the pictures? Why did Millet remain so

short a time with this artist? What did the people in the village do for

him? Why was it the students in Paris could not understand Millet? What

name did the students give him? Why did his pictures not sell? What did

the critics say about them? What else did Millet paint? Where did he

finally make his home? When did he receive recognition?

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Illustration]

Stories Pictures Tell. Book 5 · 第 12 / 21 题