I made some remark, I forget what, but he overbore me.

Real things we want are Hate--Hate and COARSE think'n. I b'long to the

school of Mrs. F's Aunt--”

“What?” said some one, intent.

“In 'Little Dorrit,'” explained Tarvrille; “go on!”

“Hate a fool,” said my assailant.

Tarvrille glanced at me. I smiled to conceal the loss of my temper.

“Hate,” said the little man, emphasising his point with a clumsy fist.

“Hate's the driving force. What's m'rality?--hate of rotten goings

on. What's patriotism?--hate of int'loping foreigners. What's

Radicalism?--hate of lords. What's Toryism?--hate of disturbance. It's

all hate--hate from top to bottom. Hate of a mess. Remington owned it

the other day, said he hated a mu'll. There you are! If you couldn't

get hate into an election, damn it (hic) people wou'n't poll. Poll for

love!--no' me!”

He paused, but before any one could speak he had resumed.

“Then this about fine thinking. Like going into a bear pit armed with a

tagle--talgent--talgent galv'nometer. Like going to fight a mad dog with

Shasepear and the Bible. Fine thinking--what we want is the thickes'

thinking we can get. Thinking that stands up alone. Taf Reform means

work for all, thassort of thing.”

The gentleman from Cambridge paused. “YOU a flag!” he said. “I'd as soon

go to ba'ell und' wet tissue paper!”

My best answer on the spur of the moment was:

“The Japanese did.” Which was absurd.

I went on to some other reply, I forget exactly what, and the talk of

the whole table drew round me. It was an extraordinary revelation to me.

Every one was unusually careless and outspoken, and it was amazing how

manifestly they echoed the feeling of this old Tory spokesman. They were

quite friendly to me, they regarded me and the BLUE WEEKLY as valuable

party assets for Toryism, but it was clear they attached no more

importance to what were my realities than they did to the remarkable

therapeutic claims of Mrs. Eddy. They were flushed and amused, perhaps

they went a little too far in their resolves to draw me, but they left

the impression on my mind of men irrevocably set upon narrow and cynical

views of political life. For them the political struggle was a game,

whose counters were human hate and human credulity; their real aim was

just every one's aim, the preservation of the class and way of living to

which their lives were attuned. They did not know how tired I was, how

exhausted mentally and morally, nor how cruel their convergent attack

on me chanced to be. But my temper gave way, I became tart and fierce,

perhaps my replies were a trifle absurd, and Tarvrille, with that quick

eye and sympathy of his, came to the rescue. Then for a time I sat

silent and drank port wine while the others talked. The disorder of

the room, the still dripping ceiling, the noise, the displaced ties and

crumpled shirts of my companions, jarred on my tormented nerves....

It was long past midnight when we dispersed. I remember Tarvrille coming

with me into the hall, and then suggesting we should go upstairs to see

the damage. A manservant carried up two flickering candles for us.

One end of the room was gutted, curtains, hangings, several chairs and

tables were completely burnt, the panelling was scorched and warped,

three smashed windows made the candles flare and gutter, and some scraps

of broken china still lay on the puddled floor.

As we surveyed this, Lady Tarvrille appeared, back from some party,

a slender, white-cloaked, satin-footed figure with amazed blue eyes

beneath her golden hair. I remember how stupidly we laughed at her

surprise.

2

I parted from Panmure at the corner of Aldington Street, and went my way

alone. But I did not go home, I turned westward and walked for a long

way, and then struck northward aimlessly. I was too miserable to go to

my house.

I wandered about that night like a man who has discovered his Gods

are dead. I can look back now detached yet sympathetic upon that wild

confusion of moods and impulses, and by it I think I can understand, oh!

half the wrongdoing and blundering in the world.

I do not feel now the logical force of the process that must have

convinced me then that I had made my sacrifice and spent my strength in

vain. At no time had I been under any illusion that the Tory party had

higher ideals than any other party, yet it came to me like a thing newly

discovered that the men I had to work with had for the most part no such

dreams, no sense of any collective purpose, no atom of the faith I held.

They were just as immediately intent upon personal ends, just as limited

by habits of thought, as the men in any other group or party. Perhaps I

had slipped unawares for a time into the delusions of a party man--but I

do not think so.

No, it was the mood of profound despondency that had followed upon the

abrupt cessation of my familiar intercourse with Isabel, that gave this

fact that had always been present in my mind its quality of devastating

revelation. It seemed as though I had never seen before nor suspected

the stupendous gap between the chaotic aims, the routine, the

conventional acquiescences, the vulgarisations of the personal life, and

that clearly conscious development and service of a collective thought

and purpose at which my efforts aimed. I had thought them but a little

way apart, and now I saw they were separated by all the distance

between earth and heaven. I saw now in myself and every one around me,

a concentration upon interests close at hand, an inability to detach

oneself from the provocations, tendernesses, instinctive hates, dumb

lusts and shy timidities that touched one at every point; and, save

for rare exalted moments, a regardlessness of broader aims and remoter

possibilities that made the white passion of statecraft seem as

unearthly and irrelevant to human life as the story an astronomer will

tell, half proven but altogether incredible, of habitable planets and

answering intelligences, suns' distances uncounted across the deep. It

seemed to me I had aspired too high and thought too far, had mocked my

own littleness by presumption, had given the uttermost dear reality of

life for a theoriser's dream.

All through that wandering agony of mine that night a dozen threads of

thought interwove; now I was a soul speaking in protest to God against

a task too cold and high for it, and now I was an angry man, scorned and

pointed upon, who had let life cheat him of the ultimate pride of his

soul. Now I was the fool of ambition, who opened his box of gold to find

blank emptiness, and now I was a spinner of flimsy thoughts, whose web

tore to rags at a touch. I realised for the first time how much I had

come to depend upon the mind and faith of Isabel, how she had confirmed

me and sustained me, how little strength I had to go on with our

purposes now that she had vanished from my life. She had been the

incarnation of those great abstractions, the saving reality, the voice

that answered back. There was no support that night in the things that

had been. We were alone together on the cliff for ever more!--that was

very pretty in its way, but it had no truth whatever that could help

me now, no ounce of sustaining value. I wanted Isabel that night, no

sentiment or memory of her, but Isabel alive,--to talk to me, to touch

me, to hold me together. I wanted unendurably the dusky gentleness of

her presence, the consolation of her voice.

We were alone together on the cliff! I startled a passing cabman into

interest by laughing aloud at that magnificent and characteristic

sentimentality. What a lie it was, and how satisfying it had been! That

was just where we shouldn't remain. We of all people had no distinction

from that humanity whose lot is to forget. We should go out to other

interests, new experiences, new demands. That tall and intricate fabric

of ambitious understandings we had built up together in our intimacy

would be the first to go; and last perhaps to endure with us would be

a few gross memories of sights and sounds, and trivial incidental

excitements....

I had a curious feeling that night that I had lost touch with life for

a long time, and had now been reminded of its quality. That infernal

little don's parody of my ruling phrase, “Hate and coarse thinking,”

stuck in my thoughts like a poisoned dart, a centre of inflammation.

Just as a man who is debilitated has no longer the vitality to resist

an infection, so my mind, slackened by the crisis of my separation from

Isabel, could find no resistance to his emphatic suggestion. It seemed

to me that what he had said was overpoweringly true, not only of

contemporary life, but of all possible human life. Love is the rare

thing, the treasured thing; you lock it away jealously and watch, and

well you may; hate and aggression and force keep the streets and rule

the world. And fine thinking is, in the rough issues of life, weak

thinking, is a balancing indecisive process, discovers with disloyal

impartiality a justice and a defect on each disputing side. “Good honest

men,” as Dayton calls them, rule the world, with a way of thinking

out decisions like shooting cartloads of bricks, and with a steadfast

pleasure in hostility. Dayton liked to call his antagonists “blaggards

and scoundrels”--it justified his opposition--the Lords were

“scoundrels,” all people richer than he were “scoundrels,” all

Socialists, all troublesome poor people; he liked to think of jails and

justice being done. His public spirit was saturated with the sombre

joys of conflict and the pleasant thought of condign punishment for

all recalcitrant souls. That was the way of it, I perceived. That had

survival value, as the biologists say. He was fool enough in politics to

be a consistent and happy politician....

Hate and coarse thinking; how the infernal truth of the phrase beat me

down that night! I couldn't remember that I had known this all along,

and that it did not really matter in the slightest degree. I had worked

it all out long ago in other terms, when I had seen how all parties

stood for interests inevitably, and how the purpose in life achieves

itself, if it achieves itself at all, as a bye product of the war

of individuals and classes. Hadn't I always known that science and

philosophy elaborate themselves in spite of all the passion and

narrowness of men, in spite of the vanities and weakness of their

servants, in spite of all the heated disorder of contemporary things?

Wasn't it my own phrase to speak of “that greater mind in men, in which

we are but moments and transitorily lit cells?” Hadn't I known that the

spirit of man still speaks like a thing that struggles out of mud and

slime, and that the mere effort to speak means choking and disaster?

Hadn't I known that we who think without fear and speak without

discretion will not come to our own for the next two thousand years?

It was the last was most forgotten of all that faith mislaid. Before

mankind, in my vision that night, stretched new centuries of confusion,

vast stupid wars, hastily conceived laws, foolish temporary triumphs

of order, lapses, set-backs, despairs, catastrophes, new beginnings, a

multitudinous wilderness of time, a nigh plotless drama of wrong-headed

energies. In order to assuage my parting from Isabel we had set

ourselves to imagine great rewards for our separation, great personal

rewards; we had promised ourselves success visible and shining in our

lives. To console ourselves in our separation we had made out of

the BLUE WEEKLY and our young Tory movement preposterously enormous

things-as though those poor fertilising touches at the soil were indeed

the germinating seeds of the millennium, as though a million lives such

as ours had not to contribute before the beginning of the beginning.

That poor pretence had failed. That magnificent proposition shrivelled

to nothing in the black loneliness of that night.

I saw that there were to be no such compensations. So far as my real

services to mankind were concerned I had to live an unrecognised

and unrewarded life. If I made successes it would be by the way. Our

separation would alter nothing of that. My scandal would cling to me

now for all my life, a thing affecting relationships, embarrassing and

hampering my spirit. I should follow the common lot of those who live by

the imagination, and follow it now in infinite loneliness of soul; the

one good comforter, the one effectual familiar, was lost to me for

ever; I should do good and evil together, no one caring to understand;

I should produce much weary work, much bad-spirited work, much absolute

evil; the good in me would be too often ill-expressed and missed or

misinterpreted. In the end I might leave one gleaming flake or so amidst

the slag heaps for a moment of postmortem sympathy. I was afraid beyond

measure of my derelict self. Because I believed with all my soul in love

and fine thinking that did not mean that I should necessarily either

love steadfastly or think finely. I remember how I fell talking to

God--I think I talked out loud. “Why do I care for these things?”

I cried, “when I can do so little! Why am I apart from the jolly

thoughtless fighting life of men? These dreams fade to nothingness, and

leave me bare!”

I scolded. “Why don't you speak to a man, show yourself? I thought I

had a gleam of you in Isabel,--and then you take her away. Do you really

think I can carry on this game alone, doing your work in darkness and

silence, living in muddled conflict, half living, half dying?”

Grotesque analogies arose in my mind. I discovered a strange parallelism

between my now tattered phrase of “Love and fine thinking” and the

“Love and the Word” of Christian thought. Was it possible the Christian

propaganda had at the outset meant just that system of attitudes I had

been feeling my way towards from the very beginning of my life? Had

I spent a lifetime making my way back to Christ? It mocks humanity

to think how Christ has been overlaid. I went along now, recalling

long-neglected phrases and sentences; I had a new vision of that great

central figure preaching love with hate and coarse thinking even in the

disciples about Him, rising to a tidal wave at last in that clamour for

Barabbas, and the public satisfaction in His fate....

It's curious to think that hopeless love and a noisy disordered dinner

should lead a man to these speculations, but they did. “He DID mean

that!” I said, and suddenly thought of what a bludgeon they'd made

of His Christianity. Athwart that perplexing, patient enigma sitting

inaudibly among publicans and sinners, danced and gibbered a long

procession of the champions of orthodoxy. “He wasn't human,” I said,

and remembered that last despairing cry, “My God! My God! why hast Thou

forsaken Me?”

“Oh, HE forsakes every one,” I said, flying out as a tired mind will,

with an obvious repartee....

I passed at a bound from such monstrous theology to a towering rage

against the Baileys. In an instant and with no sense of absurdity I

wanted--in the intervals of love and fine thinking--to fling about that

strenuously virtuous couple; I wanted to kick Keyhole of the PEEPSHOW

into the gutter and make a common massacre of all the prosperous

rascaldom that makes a trade and rule of virtue. I can still feel that

transition. In a moment I had reached that phase of weakly decisive

anger which is for people of my temperament the concomitant of

exhaustion.

“I will have her,” I cried. “By Heaven! I WILL have her! Life mocks me

and cheats me. Nothing can be made good to me again.... Why shouldn't I

save what I can? I can't save myself without her....”

I remember myself--as a sort of anti-climax to that--rather tediously

asking my way home. I was somewhere in the neighbourhood of Holland

Park....

It was then between one and two. I felt that I could go home now without

any risk of meeting Margaret. It had been the thought of returning to

Margaret that had sent me wandering that night. It is one of the ugliest

facts I recall about that time of crisis, the intense aversion I felt

for Margaret. No sense of her goodness, her injury and nobility, and

the enormous generosity of her forgiveness, sufficed to mitigate that.

I hope now that in this book I am able to give something of her silvery

splendour, but all through this crisis I felt nothing of that. There was

a triumphant kindliness about her that I found intolerable. She meant to

be so kind to me, to offer unstinted consolation, to meet my needs, to

supply just all she imagined Isabel had given me.

When I left Tarvrille's, I felt I could anticipate exactly how she would

meet my homecoming. She would be perplexed by my crumpled shirt front,

on which I had spilt some drops of wine; she would overlook that by an

effort, explain it sentimentally, resolve it should make no difference

to her. She would want to know who had been present, what we had talked

about, show the alertest interest in whatever it was--it didn't matter

what.... No, I couldn't face her.

So I did not reach my study until two o'clock.

There, I remember, stood the new and very beautiful old silver

candlesticks that she had set there two days since to please me--the

foolish kindliness of it! But in her search for expression, Margaret

heaped presents upon me. She had fitted these candlesticks with electric

lights, and I must, I suppose, have lit them to write my note to Isabel.

“Give me a word--the world aches without you,” was all I scrawled,

though I fully meant that she should come to me. I knew, though I ought

not to have known, that now she had left her flat, she was with the

Balfes--she was to have been married from the Balfes--and I sent my

letter there. And I went out into the silent square and posted the note

forthwith, because I knew quite clearly that if I left it until morning

I should never post it at all.

3

I had a curious revulsion of feeling that morning of our meeting. (Of

all places for such a clandestine encounter she had chosen the bridge

opposite Buckingham Palace.) Overnight I had been full of self pity, and

eager for the comfort of Isabel's presence. But the ill-written scrawl

in which she had replied had been full of the suggestion of her own

weakness and misery. And when I saw her, my own selfish sorrows were

altogether swept away by a wave of pitiful tenderness. Something had

happened to her that I did not understand. She was manifestly ill. She

came towards me wearily, she who had always borne herself so bravely;

her shoulders seemed bent, and her eyes were tired, and her face white

and drawn. All my life has been a narrow self-centred life; no brothers,

no sisters or children or weak things had ever yet made any intimate

appeal to me, and suddenly--I verily believe for the first time in my

life!--I felt a great passion of protective ownership; I felt that here

was something that I could die to shelter, something that meant more

than joy or pride or splendid ambitions or splendid creation to me, a

new kind of hold upon me, a new power in the world. Some sealed fountain

was opened in my breast. I knew that I could love Isabel broken, Isabel

beaten, Isabel ugly and in pain, more than I could love any sweet

or delightful or glorious thing in life. I didn't care any more for

anything in the world but Isabel, and that I should protect her. I

trembled as I came near her, and could scarcely speak to her for the

emotion that filled me....

“I had your letter,” I said.

“I had yours.”

“Where can we talk?”

The New Machiavelli · 第 76 / 87 题