CHAPTER THE THIRD ~~ THE BREAKING POINT

1

And then we broke down. We broke our faith with both Margaret and

Shoesmith, flung career and duty out of our lives, and went away

together.

It is only now, almost a year after these events, that I can begin to

see what happened to me. At the time it seemed to me I was a rational,

responsible creature, but indeed I had not parted from her two days

before I became a monomaniac to whom nothing could matter but Isabel.

Every truth had to be squared to that obsession, every duty. It astounds

me to think how I forgot Margaret, forgot my work, forgot everything

but that we two were parted. I still believe that with better chances

we might have escaped the consequences of the emotional storm that

presently seized us both. But we had no foresight of that, and no

preparation for it, and our circumstances betrayed us. It was partly

Shoesmith's unwisdom in delaying his marriage until after the end of the

session--partly my own amazing folly in returning within four days to

Westminster. But we were all of us intent upon the defeat of scandal

and the complete restoration of appearances. It seemed necessary that

Shoesmith's marriage should not seem to be hurried, still more necessary

that I should not vanish inexplicably. I had to be visible with Margaret

in London just as much as possible; we went to restaurants, we visited

the theatre; we could even contemplate the possibility of my presence at

the wedding. For that, however, we had schemed a weekend visit to Wales,

and a fictitious sprained ankle at the last moment which would justify

my absence....

I cannot convey to you the intolerable wretchedness and rebellion of

my separation from Isabel. It seemed that in the past two years all

my thoughts had spun commisures to Isabel's brain and I could think of

nothing that did not lead me surely to the need of the one intimate I

had found in the world. I came back to the House and the office and my

home, I filled all my days with appointments and duty, and it did not

save me in the least from a lonely emptiness such as I had never felt

before in all my life. I had little sleep. In the daytime I did a

hundred things, I even spoke in the House on two occasions, and by my

own low standards spoke well, and it seemed to me that I was going about

in my own brain like a hushed survivor in a house whose owner lies dead

upstairs.

I came to a crisis after that wild dinner of Tarvrille's. Something in

that stripped my soul bare.

It was an occasion made absurd and strange by the odd accident that the

house caught fire upstairs while we were dining below. It was a men's

dinner--“A dinner of all sorts,” said Tarvrille, when he invited me;

“everything from Evesham and Gane to Wilkins the author, and Heaven

knows what will happen!” I remember that afterwards Tarvrille was

accused of having planned the fire to make his dinner a marvel and a

memory. It was indeed a wonderful occasion, and I suppose if I had not

been altogether drenched in misery, I should have found the same wild

amusement in it that glowed in all the others. There were one or two

university dons, Lord George Fester, the racing man, Panmure, the

artist, two or three big City men, Weston Massinghay and another

prominent Liberal whose name I can't remember, the three men Tarvrille

had promised and Esmeer, Lord Wrassleton, Waulsort, the member for

Monckton, Neal and several others. We began a little coldly, with

duologues, but the conversation was already becoming general--so far as

such a long table permitted--when the fire asserted itself.

It asserted itself first as a penetrating and emphatic smell of burning

rubber,--it was caused by the fusing of an electric wire. The reek

forced its way into the discussion of the Pekin massacres that had

sprung up between Evesham, Waulsort, and the others at the end of the

table. “Something burning,” said the man next to me.

“Something must be burning,” said Panmure.

Tarvrille hated undignified interruptions. He had a particularly

imperturbable butler with a cadaverous sad face and an eye of rigid

disapproval. He spoke to this individual over his shoulder. “Just see,

will you,” he said, and caught up the pause in the talk to his left.

Wilkins was asking questions, and I, too, was curious. The story of the

siege of the Legations in China in the year 1900 and all that followed

upon that, is just one of those disturbing interludes in history that

refuse to join on to that general scheme of protestation by which

civilisation is maintained. It is a break in the general flow of

experience as disconcerting to statecraft as the robbery of my knife and

the scuffle that followed it had been to me when I was a boy at Penge.

It is like a tear in a curtain revealing quite unexpected backgrounds. I

had never given the business a thought for years; now this talk brought

back a string of pictures to my mind; how the reliefs arrived and the

plundering began, how section after section of the International Army

was drawn into murder and pillage, how the infection spread upward

until the wives of Ministers were busy looting, and the very sentinels

stripped and crawled like snakes into the Palace they were set to guard.

It did not stop at robbery, men were murdered, women, being plundered,

were outraged, children were butchered, strong men had found themselves

with arms in a lawless, defenceless city, and this had followed. Now it

was all recalled.

“Respectable ladies addicted to district visiting at home were as bad as

any one,” said Panmure. “Glazebrook told me of one--flushed like a woman

at a bargain sale, he said--and when he pointed out to her that the silk

she'd got was bloodstained, she just said, 'Oh, bother!' and threw it

aside and went back....”

We became aware that Tarvrille's butler had returned. We tried not to

seem to listen.

“Beg pardon, m'lord,” he said. “The house IS on fire, m'lord.”

“Upstairs, m'lord.”

“Just overhead, m'lord.”

“The maids are throwing water, m'lord, and I've telephoned FIRE.”

“No, m'lord, no immediate danger.”

“It's all right,” said Tarvrille to the table generally. “Go on! It's

not a general conflagration, and the fire brigade won't be five minutes.

Don't see that it's our affair. The stuff's insured. They say old Lady

Paskershortly was dreadful. Like a harpy. The Dowager Empress had shown

her some little things of hers. Pet things--hidden away. Susan went

straight for them--used to take an umbrella for the silks. Born

shoplifter.”

It was evident he didn't want his dinner spoilt, and we played up

loyally.

“This is recorded history,” said Wilkins,--“practically. It makes one

wonder about unrecorded history. In India, for example.”

But nobody touched that.

“Thompson,” said Tarvrille to the imperturbable butler, and indicating

the table generally, “champagne. Champagne. Keep it going.”

“M'lord,” and Thompson marshalled his assistants.

Some man I didn't know began to remember things about Mandalay. “It's

queer,” he said, “how people break out at times;” and told his story

of an army doctor, brave, public-spirited, and, as it happened,

deeply religious, who was caught one evening by the excitement of

plundering--and stole and hid, twisted the wrist of a boy until it

broke, and was afterwards overcome by wild remorse.

I watched Evesham listening intently. “Strange,” he said, “very strange.

We are such stuff as thieves are made of. And in China, too, they

murdered people--for the sake of murdering. Apart, so to speak, from

mercenary considerations. I'm afraid there's no doubt of it in certain

cases. No doubt at all. Young soldiers fresh from German high schools

and English homes!”

“Did OUR people?” asked some patriot.

“Not so much. But I'm afraid there were cases.... Some of the Indian

troops were pretty bad.”

Gane picked up the tale with confirmations.

It is all printed in the vividest way as a picture upon my memory, so

that were I a painter I think I could give the deep rich browns and warm

greys beyond the brightly lit table, the various distinguished faces,

strongly illuminated, interested and keen, above the black and white of

evening dress, the alert menservants with their heavier, clean-shaved

faces indistinctly seen in the dimness behind. Then this was coloured

emotionally for me by my aching sense of loss and sacrifice, and by

the chance trend of our talk to the breaches and unrealities of the

civilised scheme. We seemed a little transitory circle of light in a

universe of darkness and violence; an effect to which the diminishing

smell of burning rubber, the trampling of feet overhead, the swish

of water, added enormously. Everybody--unless, perhaps, it was

Evesham--drank rather carelessly because of the suppressed excitement of

our situation, and talked the louder and more freely.

“But what a flimsy thing our civilisation is!” said Evesham; “a mere

thin net of habits and associations!”

“I suppose those men came back,” said Wilkins.

“Lady Paskershortly did!” chuckled Evesham.

“How do they fit it in with the rest of their lives?” Wilkins

speculated. “I suppose there's Pekin-stained police officers,

Pekin-stained J. P.'s--trying petty pilferers in the severest

manner.”...

Then for a time things became preposterous. There was a sudden cascade

of water by the fireplace, and then absurdly the ceiling began to rain

upon us, first at this point and then that. “My new suit!” cried some

one. “Perrrrrr-up pe-rr”--a new vertical line of blackened water would

establish itself and form a spreading pool upon the gleaming cloth. The

men nearest would arrange catchment areas of plates and flower bowls.

“Draw up!” said Tarvrille, “draw up. That's the bad end of the table!”

He turned to the imperturbable butler. “Take round bath towels,” he

said; and presently the men behind us were offering--with inflexible

dignity--“Port wine, Sir. Bath towel, Sir!” Waulsort, with streaks of

blackened water on his forehead, was suddenly reminded of a wet year

when he had followed the French army manoeuvres. An animated dispute

sprang up between him and Neal about the relative efficiency of the new

French and German field guns. Wrassleton joined in and a little drunken

shrivelled Oxford don of some sort with a black-splashed shirt front who

presently silenced them all by the immensity and particularity of his

knowledge of field artillery. Then the talk drifted to Sedan and the

effect of dead horses upon drinking-water, which brought Wrassleton

and Weston Massinghay into a dispute of great vigour and emphasis. “The

trouble in South Africa,” said Weston Massinghay, “wasn't that we didn't

boil our water. It was that we didn't boil our men. The Boers drank the

same stuff we did. THEY didn't get dysentery.”

That argument went on for some time. I was attacked across the table by

a man named Burshort about my Endowment of Motherhood schemes, but

in the gaps of that debate I could still hear Weston Massinghay

at intervals repeat in a rather thickened voice: “THEY didn't get

dysentery.”

I think Evesham went early. The rest of us clustered more and more

closely towards the drier end of the room, the table was pushed along,

and the area beneath the extinguished conflagration abandoned to a

tinkling, splashing company of pots and pans and bowls and baths.

Everybody was now disposed to be hilarious and noisy, to say startling

and aggressive things; we must have sounded a queer clamour to a

listener in the next room. The devil inspired them to begin baiting me.

“Ours isn't the Tory party any more,” said Burshort. “Remington has made

it the Obstetric Party.”

“That's good!” said Weston Massinghay, with all his teeth gleaming; “I

shall use that against you in the House!”

“I shall denounce you for abusing private confidences if you do,” said

Tarvrille.

“Remington wants us to give up launching Dreadnoughts and launch babies

instead,” Burshort urged. “For the price of one Dreadnought--”

The little shrivelled don who had been omniscient about guns joined in

the baiting, and displayed himself a venomous creature. Something in

his eyes told me he knew Isabel and hated me for it. “Love and fine

thinking,” he began, a little thickly, and knocking over a wine-glass

with a too easy gesture. “Love and fine thinking. Two things don't go

together. No philosophy worth a damn ever came out of excesses of love.

Salt Lake City--Piggott--Ag--Agapemone again--no works to matter.”

Everybody laughed.

“Got to rec'nise these facts,” said my assailant. “Love and fine think'n

pretty phrase--attractive. Suitable for p'litical dec'rations. Postcard,

Christmas, gilt lets, in a wreath of white flow's. Not oth'wise

valu'ble.”

The New Machiavelli · 第 75 / 87 题