The cathedral cloister is charming with its laurels, orange-trees, and

myrtles. The frescoed arcades are brilliant with the poetic legends of

the church of Toledo, among which are St. Leocadia refusing to

sacrifice to Jupiter, and Santa Casilda, a Moorish princess converted

to the faith, visiting the Christians in her father’s dungeons. Around

the gate of the Niño Perdido is painted the legend from which it

derives its name, similar to that of St. Hugh of Lincoln. This “lost

child” was of Christian parentage, and kidnapped in 1490 by the Jews,

who carried him to La Guardia. On Good Friday they took him to a

neighboring cave and made him undergo all the tortures of the Passion,

finally crucifying him at the ninth hour, at which time his blind

mother, who was at a distance, is said to have suddenly recovered her

sight. His heart was torn out and wrapped up with a consecrated Host,

as if from some dim sense of the connection between the Sacred Heart

and the Holy Eucharist, and sent by a renegade to the Jews of Zamora.

In passing through Avila he entered the cathedral, and, while

pretending to pray, the people were surprised to see rays of light

issue from his person. They thought he was a saintly pilgrim, and

reported the occurrence to the holy office. He was questioned, and,

his replies being unsatisfactory, was arrested and convicted of being

accessory to the crime.

On the Plaza Zocodover once took place the bull-fights and other

public spectacles of Toledo. It has always been a market-place, and,

above the arcades, is the chapel of the Christo de la Sangre, where

Mass used to be said for the benefit of the market-men, who could thus

attend to their devotions without leaving their stalls.

It is on the Plaza Zocodover you may make the pleasant acquaintance of

“a most sweet Spaniard, the comfit-maker of Toledo, who can teach

sugar to slip down your throat a million of ways,” and by none easier

than what is called the _eel_ of Toledo, which could not have been

surpassed in Shakspere’s time――a most delicious compound of

sweet-meats, fashioned like a huge eel, which is sold coiled up in a

box. If the famous eels of Bolsena are to be compared with those of

Toledo, it is not surprising that, as Dante implies, they even tempted

Pope Martin the Fourth, particularly if he had been recently

subjected, like us, to the “divine diet” of the Fonda de Lino!

There are numerous charitable institutions at Toledo, due to the

munificence of its great prelates, who, if they had immense revenues,

knew how to spend them like princes of the church. Cardinal Mendoza

spent enormous sums on the magnificent hospital of Santa Cruz, which

is now converted into a military academy. Here the cross, which the

cardinal triumphantly placed on the captured Alhambra in 1492, and

which forms the device on his arms, is everywhere glorified. This

hospital is noted for its unrivalled sculptures of the Renaissance,

particularly those of the grand portal, which is really a jewel of

art. The discovery of the True Cross by St. Helena is appropriately

the chief subject. The beautiful _patio_ is surrounded by Moorish

galleries which, as well as the staircases, are sculptured. On all

sides are the Mendoza arms, with its motto composed by an angel: _Ave

Maria, gratia plena_. The rooms have fine Moorish ceilings. The church

is peculiar in shape, being in the form of a Mendoza cross, with four

long arms of equal length. The right transept is now used for

gymnastic exercises, and the left one as a school-room. On the wall

still hangs the portrait of its great founder, expressive of lofty

purpose. He was familiar with the din of camps, as well as with the

peaceful duties of charity, and does not look out of his element in

this military school. The building is a grand monument to his memory,

and one of the wonders of Toledo.

The hospital of St. John the Baptist was built by Cardinal de Tavera

in the sixteenth century, and in so magnificent a style as to make

people reverse the murmuring of Judas and say: “To what purpose is

this waste? And why hath all this money been given to the poor?” The

tomb of the beneficent prelate, sculptured by Berruguete, is in the

centre of the nave. It is in the _cinque-cento_ style. At the corners

stand some of the virtues that adorned his life: Prudence, with a

mirror and mask; Justice, with scales; Fortitude, with her tower; and

Temperance, pouring water from a vase. Over the tomb still hangs the

cardinal’s hat, after three hundred years.

In front of this hospital is a small promenade, ornamented with rude

statues of the old Gothic kings. Keeping on, outside the city walls,

we passed tower after tower of defence at the left, while at the right

lay the Vega, where are still some remains of an old Roman

amphitheatre. At length we came to the ruined palace of Roderick, the

last of the Goths, built by good King Wamba of more pleasant memory.

In a niche is a rough statue, purporting to be Don Roderick himself,

looking where he has no business to look――down on the baths of

Florinda. An immense convent beyond towers up over the walls, like a

prison with its grated windows, that are dismal from without, but

which command an admirable view over the valley of the Tagus, along

whose banks rise steep cliffs like palisades, with here and there an

old Moorish mill. Just below, the river is spanned by St. Martin’s

bridge with its ancient fortifications. On the rough hills beyond are

numerous _cigarrales_, or country-seats. There is something wild and

melancholy about the whole scene. The river itself rushes on in a

fierce, ungovernable manner, as if it had never come under the

influences of civilization. It comes from the palæontologic mountains

of Albarracin, and flows on hundreds of miles, disdaining all

commercial appliances, in lonely, lordly grandeur, till lost in the

Atlantic. Its current is clear, green, and rapid, though poets sing it

as the river of the golden waves. Don Quixote tells of four nymphs who

come forth from its waters and seat themselves in the green meadow to

broider their rich silken tissues with gold and pearls, referring to

Garcilasso de la Vega, the poet-warrior of Toledo, who says:

“De cuatro ninfas, que del Tajo amado

Salieron juntas, acantar me ofresco.…”

Farther up the river are a few Arab arches of the palace of Galiana, a

heroine of ancient romance. She was the daughter of King Alfahri, who

gave her this rural retreat, and embellished it in every possible way.

The young princess was of marvellous beauty, and generally lived here

to escape from her numerous suitors, among whom was Bradamante, a

gigantic Moorish prince from Guadalajara. This redoubtable wooer

endeavored, but in vain, to soften her heart. He only served to keep

his rivals in check. At length a foreign prince, none other than the

mighty Charlemagne himself, came to aid her father in the war against

the King of Cordova. He was at once captivated by the beauty of

Galiana, and, as she showed herself by no means insensible to his

advances, he soon ventured to ask her hand in marriage. To dispose of

Prince Bradamante, he challenged him to a private combat, and struck

off his head, which he offered to the bride-elect. This obstacle

removed, the wedding soon took place, and Galiana was triumphantly

carried to France. Some pretend Charlemagne never crossed the Ebro,

but we have unlimited faith in the legend, on which numberless songs

and romances are based, and sold to this day by blind men on the

public squares of Toledo.

One of the attractions of Toledo is Santa Maria la Blanca, an ancient

Jewish synagogue in the style of the mosque of Cordova, which, after

many vicissitudes, has become a Catholic church. The name is derived

from the ancient legend of Our Lady _ad nives_――of the snow――which led

to the foundation of Santa Maria Maggiore at Rome, and is evidently

popular in Spain from the number of churches bearing the name. That at

Toledo is very striking from the horse-shoe arches, one above the

other, supported by octagon pillars with curiously-wrought capitals.

There are lace-like wheels along the frieze of the nave, and the roof

is of cedar――a tree sacred to the Jews, and which they say only came

to perfection in the Garden of Eden. In their epitaphs we often read:

“He is gone down to the Garden of Eden, to those who are amongst the

cedars.”

The Transito is another old synagogue, which was erected in the days

of Don Pedro the Cruel by Samuel Levi, his wealthy treasurer. The

architects were probably Moors, for it is decorated in the style of

the Alhambra. It consists only of one nave, but this is richly

ornamented. Along the walls are Hebrew inscriptions, said to be in

part from the Psalms, and partly in praise of Samuel Levi. His praises

were not on the lips of the people, however. On the contrary, he was

very obnoxious to them on account of his exorbitant taxes, and when

put to the torture by Don Pedro, he was by no means regretted. The

Jews were specially detested at Toledo. It is said they opened the

city to the Moors, and subsequently to the Christians, and were

faithful to neither party. When expelled in 1492, this building was

given to the Knights of Calatrava.

The church of San Juan de los Reyes was built in 1476 by Ferdinand and

Isabella in gratitude for a victory over the Portuguese. It is now a

parish church, but was first given to the Franciscans, whose long

knotted cord is carved along the frieze. It is magnificently situated

on a height overlooking the Tagus. An immense number of chains are

suspended on the outer walls, taken from Christian captives in the

dungeons of the Alhambra. These glorious trophies were brought from

Granada in 1492, and cannot be regarded without emotion. It is

said――but who can believe it?――that some of them were recently used by

the authorities to enclose a public promenade, to save the expense of

buying new ones――a most odious piece of economy, of which Samuel Levi

himself would not have been guilty. The portal of this church is a

beautiful example of the Plateresco style, exquisite as goldsmith’s

work, with its fretted niches and sculptured shields. The building,

though only intended for a conventual church, is of grand proportions

and richly ornamented. The emblems of Ferdinand and Isabella, with

other heraldic devices, are sculptured amid delicate foliage around

the royal gallery, and over the high altar Cardinal Mendoza is painted

at the foot of the cross.

The cloisters adjoining, of the florid Gothic style, are exquisitely

beautiful. They are built around a pleasant court, which has a

fountain in the centre, and a profusion of orange-trees and myrtles.

The niches of the arcades are peopled with saints, and the columns and

arches covered with an endless variety of acanthus leaves, lilies,

bellflowers, ivy, holly, and even the humbler vegetables, carved with

a skill that reminded us of Scott’s well-known lines:

“Thou wouldst have thought some fairy’s hand

Had framed a spell, when the work was done,

And changed the willow wreaths to stone.”

The convent has been sequestered, and the Gothic refectory of the

friars is now the public museum. Near by was the palace of Cardinal

Ximenes, who was a member of the Franciscan Order.

To say nothing about the swords of Toledo would be almost like leaving

the hero out of the play. Spanish weapons have been renowned from

ancient times. Titus Livius and Martial mention them. Cicero alludes

to the _pugiunculus Hispaniensis_. Gratius Faliscus, a friend of

Ovid’s, speaks, in particular, of the _Cultrum Toledanum_ which

hunters wore at their belts:

“Ima Toledano præcingunt ilia cultro.”

Swords continued to be fabricated at Toledo in the time of the Gothic

kings. Their broad, two-edged swords were probably the type of the

_alfanjes_ of the Moors, which we see in the paintings in the

Alhambra. The kings of Castile accorded special privileges to the

corporations of _espaderos_, such as exemption from taxes on the steel

they used. This was brought from the Basque provinces, about a mile

from Mondragon.

“Vencedora espada,

De Mondragon tu acero,

Y en Toledo templada.”

――“Sword victorious, thy steel is from Mondragon, but tempered at

Toledo.”

The most ancient Toledan sword-maker known is a Moor called _Del Rey_,

because Ferdinand the Catholic stood as godfather at his conversion.

His mark was a _perrillo_, or little dog, which was so famous that Don

Quixote speaks of it. But the swords of Spain were in general renowned

all over Europe in the middle ages. Froissart speaks of the short

Spanish dagger with a wide blade. We know by Shakspere how much this

weapon was prized in England. It was a trusty Toledo blade Othello

kept in his chamber.

The great blow to the sword manufactory of Toledo was the introduction

of French costumes in the seventeenth century, in which swords were

dispensed with. Carlos III. resolved to revive this industry, and

erected the present fabric on the right shore of the Tagus, more than

a mile from the city. The swords are inferior in quality and lack

their former elegance of form. They participate in the degeneracy of

those who wield them. Spain, once noble, chivalrous, and of deep

convictions, has lost its fine temper and keenness of thrust. The raw

material out of which such wonders were wrought in the old days

remains still, however, in the people as in the country. It only needs

a return to old principles of faith and honor on the part of the

ruling classes to prepare the way for a new Spanish history, more

glorious and more advantageous to the world at large than even Spain

has ever known.

[190] It was M. Hérouard, a French refugee, employed at the

military academy at Toledo as professor of French, who,

hunting one day, in 1858, among the hills of Guarrazar,

found a fragment of a gold chain that was glittering in the

sun, and, digging, discovered the crowns that have been so

much admired at Paris, and which are even more valuable for

their historic interest than for the gold and precious

stones. Later researches have brought others to light, but

smaller in size, that are now in the Armeria at Madrid.

ENGLISH RULE IN IRELAND.

No one can pass from England into Ireland without being struck by the

contrast in the condition of the two countries――a contrast so marked

and absolute that it is revealed at the first glance, and in lines so

bold and rigid that it seems to have been produced by nature itself.

In England there is wealth, thrift, prosperity; in Ireland, poverty,

helplessness, decay. Into the great heart of London, through arteries

that stretch round the globe, the riches of the whole earth are

poured. Dublin is a city of the past, and, in spite of its imposing

structures, impresses us sadly. The English cities are busy marts of

commerce or homes of comfort, luxury, and learning. The Irish towns

are empty, silent, decayed. Into England’s ports come the ships of all

the nations; but in Ireland’s hardly a sail is unfurled. There the

chimneys of innumerable factories shut out with their black smoke the

light of heaven; here the Round Tower or the crumbling ruin stands as

a monument of death. England is over-crowded; in Ireland we travel for

miles without meeting a human being; pass through whole counties from

which the people have disappeared to make room for cattle. Freedom is

in the very air of England: the people go about their business or

pleasure in a sturdy, downright way, and in a conscious security under

the protection of wise laws; in Ireland we cannot take a step without

being offended by evidences of oppression and misrule. The people are

disarmed and unprotected, guarded by a foreign soldiery, the servants

of an alien aristocracy.

To what causes must we ascribe this wide difference in the condition

of two islands, separated by a narrow strip of sea, with but slight

dissimilarity of climate, and governed ostensibly for now nearly seven

hundred years by the same laws?

The explanation given universally by English writers, with the tone

with which one is accustomed to affirm axiomatic truths, is based upon

the dissimilarity of the two peoples in natural character and in

religious faith. The Irish, they say, are by nature discontented,

idle, and thriftless, and their religion is in fatal opposition to

liberty and progress. The subject is worthy of our attention. Ireland

is an anomaly in European history. Just at the time when the other

Christian nations, after overcoming the divisions and feuds of a

barbarous age, were settling down into the unity which renders

harmonious development possible, the seed of perpetual discord and

never-ending strife was planted ineradicably in her soil. Three

hundred years of almost incessant warfare with the Dane had left her

exhausted and divided, an easy prey to the Norman barons, who

introduced into her national life a foreign blood and an alien

civilization.

From that day to the present time Ireland’s fate has been the saddest

of which history has preserved the record. There has been no peace, no

liberty, no progress. Opposing races, contrary civilizations, and

opposite religions have clashed in such fierce and bloody battles that

we could almost fancy the furies of the abyss had been let loose to

smite and scourge the doomed land. Mercy, justice, all human feelings

have been banished from this struggle, which has been one of brute

force and fiendish cunning. Whatever the stronger has been able to do

has been done; and there is no good reason for believing that England,

in her dealings with Ireland, has ever passed one just law or

redressed one wrong from a humane or honorable motive. From the

conquest to the schism of Henry VIII., a period of nearly four

centuries, the English colonists, entrenched within the Pale and

receiving continually reinforcements from the mother country, formed a

nation within a nation, always armed and watching every opportunity to

make inroads upon the possessions of the native princes, who were not

slow to return blow for blow. There was no security for life or

property; the people were left to the mercy of barons and kings, to be

robbed and pillaged or butchered in their broils. Nothing could be

more inhuman than English legislation in Ireland during these four

centuries, unless it be English legislation in Ireland during the

three centuries which followed. Henry II. confiscated the whole

island, dividing the land among ten of his chief followers; though

they were able to hold possession of but a small part of the country.

In the legal enactments and official documents of this period the term

habitually used to designate the native population is “the Irish

enemy.” They were never spoken of except as “the wild Irish,” until,

as an English writer affirms, the term “wild Irish” became as familiar

in the English language as the term wild beast. They were denied the

title of English subjects and the protection of English law. An act,

passed in the reign of Edward II., gave to the English landlords the

right to dispose of the property of their Irish dependents as they

might see fit. All social and commercial intercourse with the “Irish

enemy” was interdicted. An Irishman if found talking with an

Englishman was to be apprehended as a spy and punished as an enemy of

the king; and the violation of an Irishwoman was not a crime before

the law. Even exile was not permitted as a mitigation of this misery;

for a law of Henry IV. forbade the “Irish enemy” to emigrate. There is

no exaggeration in the address which the people of Ireland sent to

Pope John XXII.:

“Most Holy Father,” they say, “we send you some precise and truthful

information concerning the state of our nation, and the wrongs which

we are suffering, and which our ancestors have suffered from the kings

of England, their agents, and the English barons born in Ireland.

After having driven us by violence from our dwellings, from our fields

and our ancestral possessions――after having forced us to flee to the

mountains, the bogs, the woods, and caves to save our lives――they

cease not to harass us here even, but strive to expel us altogether

from the country, that they may gain possession of it in its entire

extent. They have destroyed all the written laws by which we were

formerly governed. The better to compass our ruin, they have left us

without laws.… It is the opinion of all their laymen, and of many of

their ecclesiastics, that there is no more sin in killing an Irishman

than in killing a dog. They all maintain that they have the right to

take from us our lands and our goods.”

In the second period of English rule in Ireland, to the war of races

was added a war of religion, in which the “Irish enemy” became the

“Popish idolater.” To kill an Irishman was no sin, and to exterminate

idolatrous superstition was a mission imposed by Heaven upon the

chosen people to whom the pure faith of Christ had been revealed.

Then began the series of butcheries, devastations, famines,

exterminations, and exiles which have not yet come to an end. The

horrors of these three centuries have not been written; they can never

be rightly told, or even imagined. Ireland was not only conquered, but

confiscated.

Elizabeth confiscated 600,000 acres of land in Munster after the

revolt of the Earl of Desmond; her successor, James I., confiscated a

million acres in Ulster. Charles I. confiscated 240,000 acres in

Connaught, and would have confiscated the whole province had he been

able to obtain possession of it. Under the Commonwealth 7,708,237

acres were confiscated. William of Orange confiscated 1,060,000 acres.

And in these confiscations we have not included the lands of the

church, which were all turned over to the Establishment. The atrocity

of England’s Irish wars is without a parallel in the history of

Christian nations. Women and children were murdered in cold blood;

priests were burned to death; churches were pillaged and set on fire;

towns were sacked and the inhabitants put to the sword; men and youths

were put on shipboard, carried into mid-ocean, and deliberately thrown

into the sea. Others were sold as slaves in the Barbadoes. Whatever

could serve as food for man was destroyed, that famine might make way

with all who escaped the sword. Spenser, the poet, who visited Ireland

after the revolt of the Earl of Desmond, in the reign of Elizabeth,

has left us a description of the condition of that province as he saw

it: “Out of every corner of the woods and glens they came, creeping

forth upon their hands, for their legs could not bear them; they

looked like anatomies of death; they spake like ghosts crying out of

their graves; they did eat the dead carrions, happy where they could

find them; yea, and one another soon after, inasmuch as the very

carcasses they spared not to scrape out of their graves; and if they

found a plot of water-cresses or shamrocks, there they flocked as to a

feast for the time, yet not able long to continue therewithal; that in

short space there were none almost left; and a most populous and

plentiful country suddenly left void of man and beast.”[191]

Lord Gray, one of Elizabeth’s lieutenants, declared towards the end of

her life that “little was left in Ireland for her Majesty to reign

over but carcasses and ashes.”

Cromwell’s wars were even more cruel, and left Ireland in a condition,

if possible, more wretched still. Half the people had perished; and

the survivors were dying of hunger in the bogs and glens in which they

had sought refuge from the fury of the troopers. Wolves prowled around

the gates of Dublin, and wolf-hunting and priest-hunting became

important and lucrative occupations. But it is needless to dwell

longer upon this painful subject. Let us remark, however, that it

would be unjust to hold Elizabeth or Cromwell responsible for these

cruelties. They but executed the will of the English people, who still

cherish their memories and justify these outrages. No English ruler

ever feared being called to account for harshness or tyranny in

dealing with Ireland. The public opinion of the nation considered the

extirpation of the Irish as a work to be done, and applauded whoever

helped forward its consummation. This much we may affirm on the

authority of Protestant witnesses. “The favorite object of the Irish

governors,” says Leland, “and of the English Parliament was the utter

extirpation of all the Catholic inhabitants of Ireland.”

“It is evident,” says Warner, “from the Lords-Justices’ last letter to

the Lieutenant, that they hoped for an extirpation, not of the mere

Irish only, but of all the English families that were Roman

Catholics.”

The feeling against the Irish was even stronger than against the

church, so that the English seemed to feel a kind of pleasure in the

adherence of the Celtic population to the old faith, since it widened

the chasm between the two races. They really made no serious efforts

to convert the Irish to Protestantism. They neglected to provide them

with instructors capable of making themselves understood. They put

forth no Protestant translation of the Bible in the Irish language,

but contented themselves with setting up a hierarchy of archbishops,

bishops, and rectors whose lives were often scandalous, and who, as

Macaulay says, did nothing, and for doing nothing were paid out of the

spoils of a church loved and revered by the people. Some justification

for the extermination of the Irish race would be found in the fact

that those who perished were only papists. War, famine, confiscation,

and exile had, by the close of the seventeenth century, either

destroyed or impoverished the native and Catholic population of

Ireland. The land was almost exclusively in the hands of Protestants,

who had also taken possession of all the cathedrals, churches, and

monasteries which had escaped destruction. The Catholics, reduced to

beggary, were driven from the towns and, as far as possible, from the

English settlements into the bleak and barren hills of Connaught. In

many instances the confiscated lands had been given to Englishmen or

Scotchmen, with the express stipulation that no Irish Catholic should

be employed by them, even as a common laborer. In this extremity the

Irish people were helpless. Every line along which it was possible to

advance to a better state of things was cut off. Their natural leaders

had been driven into exile or reduced to abject poverty; their

spiritual guides had been murdered or banished; or if any had escaped

their pitiless persecutors, a price was set upon their heads, and they

led the lives of outlaws, unable to administer the sacraments even to

the dying, except by stealth.

All their institutions of learning had been destroyed; and England

permitted no instruction except in the English tongue――which the Irish

neither spoke nor were willing to speak――and in Protestant schools,

from which she knew the Catholics were necessarily shut out. They not

only had nothing, but were in a condition in which it was impossible

that they should acquire anything. Indeed, the little security which

was still left them to drag out a miserable existence was found

precisely in their utter helplessness and wretchedness. They could no

longer be plundered, for they had nothing; they could not be butchered

in battle, for they were powerless and without weapons; and so their

persecutors paused, not, as the poet says, to listen to their sad

lament, but from sheer contempt and indifference, thinking it no

longer worth while to take notice of their hapless victims.

Three-fourths of the population of the island were nevertheless still

Irish Catholics; and in spite of the persistent efforts to drive them

all beyond the Shannon, the moment the violence of persecution abated

large numbers showed themselves in other parts of the country,

especially in the province of Munster. It was at this time, and to

meet any danger that might arise from the mingling of the Irish

Catholics with the Protestant colonists, that the Penal Code was

enacted, by which the entire population that still held to the ancient

faith was deprived of all rights and reduced to the condition of

helots and pariahs. This Code, the most inhuman ever contrived by the

perverted ingenuity of man, was the work of the Irish Parliament,

which, it is almost needless to say, represented only the Protestants

of Ireland. Violence had done its work; the Catholic Irish had been

reduced to a condition as wretched as it is possible for man to suffer

and live; and now the form of justice and the semblance of law are

invoked to make this condition perpetual. Suddenly, and for the first

time, the Protestants of Ireland seem animated with religious zeal for

the conversion of the Catholics. The extermination of the Irish race

was abandoned as hopeless; and, indeed, there seemed to be no good

ground for believing that a people who had survived the wars, famines,

and exiles by which Ireland had been drained of its population during

the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries could be extirpated. Nothing

remained, therefore, but to convert them. This was the pretext with

which men sought to hide the monstrous iniquity of the penal laws. All

bishops and monks were ordered to quit Ireland before the 1st of May,

1698, under pain of imprisonment and transportation; and, in case they

should return, they were to suffer death. Heavy fines were imposed

upon all who harbored or concealed the proscribed ecclesiastics; and

rewards were offered for their discovery or apprehension. Care was

taken at the same time to exclude all foreign priests. By thus cutting

off from Ireland the fountain-source of orders and ecclesiastical

jurisdiction, it was confidently expected that in a few years the

Catholic priesthood would cease to exist there, and that the people,

left without priests or sacraments, would have no alternative but to

become Protestants. Every exterior sign of Catholic worship was

suppressed, and it was tolerated only as a hidden cult, whose

ceremonies were performed with bated breath, clandestinely in cabins

and unfrequented places. Whatever appealed to the heart or the

imagination was condemned. The steeple that pointed to heaven; the

bell whose religious tones thrilled with accents of a world of peace;

the cross that told of the divinity that is in suffering and sorrow;

the pilgrimages in which the people gathered to cherish sacred

memories and to do homage to worthy deeds and noble lives, were all

proscribed. And even the poor huts in which it was possible to offer

the Holy Sacrifice were carefully watched by the officers of the law,

as to-day, in the great cities, places of infamy are put under the

surveillance of the police.

Having suppressed the hierarchy and shorn the Catholic religion of its

splendor, the rulers of Ireland next proceeded to adopt measures by

which every imaginable inducement to apostasy was held out both to the

clergy and the laity. An annual pension, first of twenty, then of

thirty, and finally of forty pounds sterling was offered to all

priests who should abandon their religion. Whether or not they

accepted this bribe was held to be of small importance, as their ranks

were rapidly thinned by death, and precautions had been taken that the

vacancies should not be refilled.

The Catholic people were placed in a position like that of the Forty

Martyrs, who were exposed naked on the frozen lake, surrounded by warm

baths and comfortable houses, which they could enter by renouncing

their faith. The deepest and holiest instincts of human nature were

appealed to against the most sacred convictions which man is capable

of holding. If the father wished to educate his child, schools

abounded, but he could enter them only by abandoning his religion. He

was not, indeed, forced to send his children to these Protestant

schools, but it was made impossible for him to send them to any other.

His tyrants went farther. They spared no pains to make it impossible

that an Irish Catholic should learn anything even by stealth. All

Catholic schoolmasters were banished from Ireland, and, in case of

return, were to suffer death.

The law made express provision for the money necessary to defray the

expenses of transporting these obnoxious persons. Nay, it went yet

farther. There were schools on the continent of Europe to which a few

Irish children might possibly find their way. This danger was foreseen

and met. An act was passed prohibiting Catholics from sending their

children across the Channel without special permission, and the

magistrates were authorized to demand at any time that parents should

produce their children before them. Beyond this it was not possible to

go. All that human enactments can do to degrade the mind of a whole

people to a state of brutish ignorance was done. And let us remark

that this applied not to the Irish only, but to all Catholics who

spoke the English language. The English government took from them

every opportunity of knowledge, made it criminal for them to know

anything; and then they were denounced by English writers almost

universally as the foes of learning and as lovers of ignorance. We

know of no harder or more cruel fate in all history, nor of a more

striking example of the injustice of the world towards the church.

Even here in the United States we Catholics are still suffering the

consequences of this unparalleled infamy. But we have hardly entered

on the subject of the Penal Laws: we are as yet on the threshold.

The enforced ignorance of the Irish Catholics was but a preparation

for innumerable other legal outrages. From all the honorable careers

of life they were mercilessly shut out――from the army; the navy, the

magistracy, and the civil service. That a Catholic was not permitted

to become an educator we have already seen. As little was he allowed

to perform the functions of barrister, attorney, or solicitor. He

could neither vote nor be elected to office. Shut out from all public

life, from every liberal profession, disfranchised, ignorant,

despised, was anything else needed to make the Irish Catholic the most

wretched of men? His land had been confiscated, he had been robbed; he

was a beggar; but might he not hope gradually to lift himself out of

the degradation of his poverty? To regain ownership of the soil was

out of the question. He was disqualified by law, which, however,

permitted him to become a tenant――not to do him a favor, but solely

for the benefit of the landlord, to whose arbitrary will he was made a

slave. This is but half the truth. The iniquity of the law mistrusted

the rectitude of human nature even in an Irish landlord. He was

therefore compelled to be unjust to his tenant; to give him but short

leases; to force him to pay at least two-thirds of the value of the

produce of his farm; to punish him for improving his land by

augmenting the rent; and, lest there should be any doubt as to the

seriousness of these barbarous enactments, a premium was offered for

the discovery of instances of their violation in favor of Catholic

tenants. The landlord was not allowed to be just, but he was free to

be as heartless and inhuman as he pleased. His tenants had no rights,

they belonged to a despised race, they professed an idolatrous

religion, and their extermination had been the cherished policy of the

English government for six hundred years. If there was no hope here

for the Irish Catholic, might he not, with better prospects, turn to

commercial or industrial pursuits?

Without, for the present, taking a larger view of this question, it

will be sufficient to consider the restrictions placed upon Catholics

in this matter. Commerce and manufacture were controlled by municipal

and trading corporations of which no Irish Catholic could be a member.

This of itself, at a time when monopoly and privilege were everywhere

recognized, gave to Protestants the entire business of the country.

Prohibitory laws were therefore not needed. But no security could lull

to rest the fierce spirit of the persecuting Protestant oligarchy. A

Catholic could not acquire real estate; he could not even rent land,

except on ruinous terms; he could not exercise a liberal profession or

fill a public office; he was unable to engage in commerce or

manufacture; he had no political rights, no protection from the law;

and, to make all this doubly bitter, his masters were at once the

enemies of his race and his religion. This, one would think, ought to

have been enough to satisfy the worst of tyrants. But it is of the

nature of tyranny that the more it oppresses, the more it feels the

necessity of inflicting new wrongs upon its victims. Every motive that

incites men to activity and labor had been taken from the Catholics,

and yet their oppressors, with the cowardice which naturally belongs

to evil-doers, were still fearful lest some of them might, by chance

or good fortune, acquire wealth enough to lift them above the

immediate necessities of life. A universal threat was therefore held

over all who possessed anything. A Catholic was not allowed to own a

horse worth more than five pounds; any Protestant in the kingdom might

take the best he had by paying him that sum. Whenever it was deemed

necessary to call out the militia, the law declared all horses

belonging to Catholics subject to seizure; and twenty shillings a day

for the maintenance of each troop was levied on the papists of the

country. Whenever property was destroyed, the law assumed that the

Catholics were the offenders, and they were forced to indemnify the

owners for their loss. They were taxed for the support of the

government, in which they were not allowed to take part and from which

they received no protection; for the maintenance of the Established

Church, in which they did not believe and which was already rich with

the spoils of the Catholic Church.

No Catholic was permitted to marry a Protestant; and the priest

assisting at such marriage was punished with death. No Catholic could

be a guardian; and to the agonies of death this new pain was added:

that the dying father foresaw that his children would be committed to

Protestants, to be brought up in a religious faith which had been the

unclean source of all the ills that had befallen him and his country.

The law held out a bribe to Catholic children to induce them to betray

their parents, and put a premium on apostasy.

This inhuman Code was not framed at one time, nor was there found in

its enactments any system or unity of purpose, other than that which

is derived from the hate of the persecutor for his victim. To this

blind fury whatever helped to crush and degrade the Catholic people of

Ireland seemed just.

Though it seems almost incredible, it is nevertheless certain, that

the execution of these laws was worse than the laws themselves. The

whole intent of the legislators being directed to the extermination or

perversion of the Irish Catholics, the fullest license was granted to

the caprice and cruelty of individuals. The Catholic had no

protection. If he sought to defend himself, he was forced to employ a

Protestant lawyer, who could bring his case only before a Protestant

judge, who was obliged to submit it to a Protestant jury. In these

circumstances recourse to the law was worse than useless. The great

landed proprietors were accustomed to deal out justice with a high

hand. They had prisons in their castles, into which, for or without

cause, they threw their helpless dependents; and whenever these

outrageous proceedings were complained of, the grand juries threw out

the indictments. To horsewhip or beat the poor Catholics was a

frequent mode of correction, and they were even deliberately murdered

without any fear of punishment. This we have upon the authority of

Arthur Young, whose testimony is certainly above suspicion; and he

adds that the violation of their wives and daughters was not

considered an offence. If the great lord met them on the road, his

servants were ordered to turn their wagons and carts into the ditch to

make room for his carriage; and if the unfortunate wretches dared

complain, they were answered with the lash. For a Catholic to bring

suit against his Protestant persecutor would have been at once most

absurd and most dangerous.

The religious fanaticism which had inspired the Penal Code lost its

honesty and earnestness amid these frightful excesses. The tyrant is

degraded with his victim, and crimes committed in the name of

religion, if they begin in sincerity, end in hypocrisy. Even the poor

honesty of blind zeal vanishes, and selfishness and hate alone remain.

This is the sad spectacle which Ireland presents to our view after the

first fury of persecution had spent itself. The dominant class grew

indifferent to all religion, and, having ignominiously failed to make

any impression on the faith of the Catholics, connived at their

worship.

But as zeal grew cold, self-interest became more intense. So long as

the Catholics remained in poverty and helplessness no notice was taken

of them; but the moment they acquired anything which could excite the

cupidity of a Protestant, the law was appealed to against them. The

priest, who, according to the Code, incurred the penalty of

transportation or hanging for saying Mass, could violate this article

with impunity, provided he possessed nothing which might serve as a

motive for denouncing him. The laws against Catholic worship were kept

upon the statute-book, chiefly because they served as an ever-ready

and convenient pretext for robbing Catholics. Another end, too,

scarcely less important, was thereby gained. The Catholics, even when

left in peace, lived in continual fear, knowing that any chance spark

would be sufficient to light the flames of persecution. In this way it

was hoped that the martyr-spirit in them would give place to the

spirit of the slave; and this hope was not altogether delusive. Since

there was a kind of security in remaining in abject poverty, in

lurking in secret places, in speaking only with bated breath, and in

showing the most cringing servility in the presence of their masters,

the Catholics came by degrees to look upon this servile condition as

their normal state, and hardly dared even hope for a better. We may

remark that this is another instance in which the Catholic Church is

held responsible for the work of Protestants. Protestant England has

enslaved Catholic Ireland; has for centuries put forth the most

heartless and cunningly-devised efforts to extinguish in the Irish

Catholics every noble and free aspiration of the human heart; and then

she has turned round and appealed to the world, with the cant which is

twin-born with hypocrisy, to bear witness that Ireland is in fetters

because the Catholic Church is opposed to liberty; and the world, in

whose eyes success is ever the highest and the best, has smiled

approval.

Is it, then, possible that six hundred years of hereditary bondage, of

outlawry, of want and oppression, should produce no evil effect upon

the character of a people, however nobly endowed by God? Are we to

expect industry when every motive that incites men to labor is absent?

How can he who is forbidden to possess anything be provident? Or is it

not natural that the hopelessly wretched should grow desperate,

reckless of their deeds or their consequences?

Great misfortunes, like great successes, try men as nothing else can.

In the lowest depths of misery we are apt to forget that there is a

lower deep. For ourselves, the more we study the history of the Irish

people, and compare their character with the wrongs which they have

suffered, the more wonderful does it seem to us that they should have

remained superior to fate. If they have not wholly escaped the evil

influences of the worst of all tyrannies, nothing, at least, has been

able to destroy their purity, their hopefulness, their trust in God,

and belief in the final triumph of right. They are, in our eyes, the

highest example of the supremacy of the soul, of the invincible power

of faith; the most striking proof of a divine Providence that watches

over the destiny of nations. It will not be thought out of place to

quote here the words of a Protestant historian who, in his old age,

seems to regret the impartiality and generous love of unpopular truth

which characterized his earlier manhood.

“Such,” says Mr. Bancroft, “was the Ireland of the Irish――a conquered

people, whom the victors delighted to trample upon and did not fear to

provoke. Their industry within the kingdom was prohibited or repressed

by law, and then they were calumniated as naturally idle. Their

savings could not be invested on equal terms in trade, manufactures,

or real property, and they were called improvident. The gates of

learning were shut on them, and they were derided as ignorant. In the

midst of privations they were cheerful. Suffering for generations

under acts which offered bribes to treachery, their integrity was not

debauched. No son rose against his father, no friend betrayed his

friend. Fidelity to their religion――to which afflictions made them

cling more closely――chastity, and respect for the ties of family

remained characteristics of the down-trodden race.”[192]

So long as there was question of oppressing and impoverishing the

Irish Catholics the Protestant Ascendency received the hearty approval

and efficient co-operation of the English government. But there was

danger lest these Irish Protestants, possessing a country of the

richest natural resources, should come to compete with England in the

markets of the world.

There are few countries in the world so fertile as Ireland. About

one-half of the island consists of a fat soil, with a chalky sub-soil,

which is the very best of soils. The richness and beauty of her

meadows were celebrated by Orosius as early as the fifth century. The

climate is milder than that of England; the scenery more varied and

lovely. The frequent rains clothe the fields with perpetual verdure.

From her wild mountains gush numerous rivers, which, as they flow into

the sea, form the safest and most capacious harbors, while in their

rapid course they develop a water-power, available for purposes of

manufacture, unsurpassed in the world. This water-power of Ireland has

been estimated by Sir Robert Kane at three and a half millions of

horse power. The country abounds in iron ore, and three centuries ago

Irish iron was exported to England. Geologists have counted in the

island no less than seven immense beds of both anthracite and

bituminous coal; and of turf, the heating power of which is half that

of coal, the supply is inexhaustible. The soil is most favorable to

the growth of the beet-root, from which such large quantities of sugar

are made in France and Belgium. The flax and hemp, as is well known,

are of the best quality, and the fineness of Irish wool has long been

celebrated. The rivers and lakes abound in trout and salmon and pike;

and the fisheries alone, if properly managed, might become the source

of enormous wealth. Were it not that, in the designs of Providence,

the most cunningly-devised plans, when conceived in iniquity, defeat

themselves, the English statesmen would have perceived that the most

efficacious means for bringing about the result at which the policy of

England, in its relations with Ireland, had always aimed, would have

been the encouragement of Irish commerce and manufactures. No benefit

could have accrued, from such a course, to the Catholic population,

which was not only disfranchised, but rendered incapable by law of

acquiring or possessing wealth.

Had the descendants of the Scotch and English settlers planted by

Elizabeth, James, and Cromwell been permitted or encouraged to develop

the natural resources of the country, they would not only have grown

strong, but opportunities of remunerative labor and hope of gain would

have attracted new settlers, and in this way Ireland would have been

filled with Protestants, whose loyalty would have been firmly secured

by this wise and conciliating policy. The agitations which rendered

some amelioration of the condition of the Catholics unavoidable as

part of a general system would not have taken place; the strength of

the Protestant Ascendency would have grown with increasing numbers and

wealth; exile would have remained the only refuge of the Catholic

remnant from misery and death; and Ireland to-day might be as

Protestant as was Ulster in the reign of Charles I.

But no motive of religion or humanity has ever influenced the policy

of the English government when there was question of English

interests. The desire of acquiring wealth or the necessity of

defending one’s possessions are, in the opinion of Englishmen, the

only sufficient reasons for going to war.

“Even in dreams to the chink of his pence

This huckster put down war.”

It was not to be expected that Ireland, with her harbors and rivers,

her fertile fields and unnumbered flocks, would be permitted to tempt

capital to her shores or to stimulate enterprise. Nothing seemed more

shocking to the English traders and manufacturers than the thought of

having to compete in the home and foreign markets with the products of

Irish industry. It was deemed intolerable that this nest of popery,

this den of ignorance and corruption, should be dealt with in the same

manner as England. The Parliament was therefore called upon to “make

the Irish remember that they were conquered.”

England had assisted the Protestants of Ireland to crush the

Catholics; she had for this purpose placed at their service her

treasures, and her armies; and now the Irish Protestants were

required, in evidence of their gratitude, to sacrifice the commercial

and industrial interests of their country to English jealousy.

At the end of the seventeenth century the manufacture of woollen

stuffs had attained to considerable importance in the southern

provinces of Ireland. The superiority of the Irish broadcloths,

blankets, and friezes was recognized, and it was therefore resolved

that they should no longer be manufactured. The Lords and Commons, in

1698, called upon William III. to protect the interests of English

merchants; and his majesty replied in the well-known words “I shall do

all that in me lies to discourage the woollen manufacture of Ireland.”

Accordingly, an export duty of four shillings in the pound was laid on

all broadcloths carried out of Ireland, and half as much on kerseys,

flannels, and friezes. This, in fact, was equivalent to a prohibition,

and the ruin of the Irish woollen manufactures which followed was not

an unforeseen, but the directly intended, consequence of this measure.

The linen manufacture, since there were at the time no rival English

interests, was opposed only in an indirect way by offering large

bounties for the making of linen in the Highlands of Scotland,

bounties on the exportation of English linen, and by imposing a tax of

30 per cent. on all foreign linens, with which most of the Irish

linens were classed.

Still other measures were needed for the complete destruction of Irish

commerce and industry. The _Navigation Laws_ forbade all direct trade

between Ireland and the British colonies; so that all produce intended

for Ireland had first to be unloaded in an English port. The Irish

were not allowed to build or keep at sea a single ship. “Of all the

excellent timber,” said Dean Swift in 1727, “cut down within these

fifty or sixty years, it can hardly be said that the nation hath

received the benefit of one valuable house to dwell in, or one ship to

trade with.” The forests of Ireland, which so greatly added to the

beauty of the country, were felled and carried to England to build

ships which were to bring the wealth of the world into English ports.

Even the Irish fishery “must be with men and boats from England.”

By these and similar measures, commercial and industrial Ireland was

blotted out of existence, and even the possibility of her ever

entering into competition with England for the trade of the world

disappeared. The unjust legislation by which Irish industry was

repressed was not inspired by religious passion nor directed against

the Catholic population. Their condition was already so wretched and

helpless that it would have been difficult to discover anything by

which it could have been made worse. “The aboriginal inhabitants,”

says Macaulay――“more than five-sixths of the population――had no more

interest in the matter than the swine or the poultry; or, if they had

an interest, it was for their interest that the caste which domineered

over them should not be emancipated from all external control. They

were no more represented in the Parliament which sat at Dublin than in

the Parliament which sat at Westminster. They had less to dread from

legislation at Westminster than from legislation at Dublin.… The most

acrimonious English Whig did not feel towards them that intense

antipathy, compounded of hatred, fear, and scorn, with which they were

regarded by the Cromwellian who dwelt among them.”[193]

Molyneux, who at this time came forward as the champion of Ireland and

of liberty, demanded nothing for the Irish Catholics but a more cruel

slavery; and Dean Swift, who gained much popularity for his advocacy

of Irish rights, declared he would as soon think of consulting the

swine as the aboriginal inhabitants of the island.

Indisputable as the fact is that the Irish Catholics had no direct

interest in the contest in which the commerce and industry of their

country were destroyed, the consequences of the iniquitous policy of

England proved nevertheless most disastrous to them. Manual labor was

the only work which they were permitted to do, and there now remained

for them nothing but the tillage of the soil, either as

tenants-at-will or common laborers. Ireland was to supply England with

beef and butter, and the work of exterminating the Irish Catholics was

not to be pushed further than the exigencies of successful

cattle-grazing might demand. Society was constituted in the simplest

manner. There were but two classes――the possessors of the soil and the

tillers of the soil: the lord and the peasant; the master and the

slave; the Protestant and the Catholic; the rich man and the beggar.

There were but two kinds of human dwellings――the castle, with its high

walls and splendid park, and the mud cabin, in which it was impossible

that there should be anything but filth and rags. The multitude lived

for a few men, by whom they were valued as their horses or their dogs,

but not treated so humanly. A contrast more absolute has never

existed, even in the despotisms of Asia. The picture is revolting; it

cannot be contemplated even in imagination without loathing, or

thought of with any composure. It is a blot on humanity, an infamy

which no glory and no services can condone. Ireland was in the hands

of the worst class of men whom history has ever made odious――an

aristocracy which hated the land from which it derived its titles,

despised the people from whom it received its wealth, shirked the

duties and responsibilities imposed by its privileges, and used its

power only to oppress and impoverish the nation. The Irish people were

thus under the weight of a double tyranny――that of England and that of

their lords; and the fiend best knows which was the worst.

The Southern planter felt a kind of interest in his slaves――they were

his property; an Irish landlord felt no interest of any kind in the

people by whom he was surrounded. It was important that they should

remain slaves, beggars, and outcasts; that the chasm which separated

him from them should in no way be diminished; but for the rest he gave

no thought whether they starved or murdered one another or were

drowned in the deep. He spent most of his time in England, living in

luxury, leaving his estates to the care of brutal agents, who pleased

him the better the more cruel and grinding their exactions were.

English in origin and sympathy, Protestant in religion, there was no

bond of union between him and his people. He cared neither for the

country nor its inhabitants. He was unwilling to risk capital even to

improve his own lands; for he had no faith in the permanence of a

social and political state which was possible only because it outraged

the holiest and best instincts of mans nature. When it was proposed to

take steps to drain the bogs and bring the waste lands of Ireland

under cultivation, the Protestant party strenuously opposed the

measure, on the ground that this would be an encouragement to popery.

Nothing, therefore, was done either by the government or the landlords

to improve the soil or to introduce better methods of tillage. The

great proprietors, living in London, spending their time and fortune

in a life of pleasure and display, let out their estates to land

speculators, who were generally capitalists. These speculators sublet

them, in lots of several hundred or a thousand acres, to a class of

persons called middlemen, who divided them up into portions of five,

ten, or twenty acres, and rented them to the poor Catholics. By

neither the proprietors nor the speculators nor the middlemen was any

risk of capital made. The peasant was therefore compelled to rent his

little plot of ground, bare of everything――he found on it neither

dwelling nor stabling, nor implements of any kind. He had nothing

himself, and those whose interest it would have been to advance him

money were unwilling to risk a penny. All that he could do was to put

up a mud-cabin, and to get a wretched spade with which to begin work.

If by honest labor he could have looked forward to an improvement in

his condition, his lot would not have been altogether comfortless. The

pioneers who in this new world have led the army of civilization from

the Atlantic to the Pacific began life almost as poor as an Irish

peasant of the seventeenth or the eighteenth century; but for them no

law of man reversing nature’s first law made labor sterile. How was

the poor Irish Catholic, with but a few acres of ground, and without

the necessary means for proper cultivation, to pay the exorbitant rent

which was to support the landlord, the speculator, and the

middleman?――for upon him alone rested the burden of maintaining all

three in a life of ease and luxury. The soil refuses to satisfy the

unreasonable demands made upon it; the tenant finds that he is unable

to pay his rent; and without the least ceremony he and his wife and

children are turned upon the road. England having destroyed the

commerce and manufactures of Ireland, he can find nothing to do, and,

if he is unwilling to see his wife and children starve, he must beg.

And even beggary, with its frightful degradations, affords little

relief; for the rich spurn him and the poor have nothing to give. Few

words are needed to bring home to us the significance of this state of

affairs. We have only to recall the tragedy Which was enacted under

our eyes in 1849. In that one year _fifty thousand families_ were

turned upon the road to die; _two hundred thousand human beings_,

without shelter, without bread, sent up their piteous moan of hunger

and despair to God from the midst of a Christian nation, the richest

in the world. The terrible famine of 1847 and 1848, which was only an

unusually startling outbreak of an evil that has long been chronic in

Ireland, was not caused by excess of population. The country, if its

resources were properly developed, is capable of supporting a far

larger number of inhabitants than it has ever had. There were but

eight millions of people in Ireland in 1847, and it has been

conclusively proven that under favorable circumstances fifteen

millions would not be an excessive population. In fact, in the

so-called years of scarcity, when the people were dying, by thousands,

of starvation, the country produced enough to feed its inhabitants;

but they had to sell their wheat, barley, and oats to pay the rent,

and, the potato crop having failed, they had nothing to eat. In 1846

and 1847 enormous quantities of grain and live-stock were exported

from Ireland to England, and yet the people of Ireland were starving.

During the four years of famine Ireland exported four quarters of

wheat for every quarter imported. The food was in the country, but it

had to be sent to England to pay the rent of the landlords. The people

were starving, but that was no concern of these noble gentlemen, so

long as their rent was paid. The cry of hunger has rarely been hushed

in Ireland. All through the eighteenth century the people died of

starvation. In 1727 Boulter, the Protestant Archbishop of Armagh,

declared that thousands of families were driven from their homes by

hunger; and Dean Swift has given us an account of the condition in his

time of even the better class of tenants. “The families,” he says, “of

farmers who pay great rents live in filth and nastiness, upon

buttermilk and potatoes, without a shoe or stocking to their feet, or

a house as convenient as an English hog-sty to receive them.” In 1734

the famous Bishop Berkeley asked this question: “Is there on the face

of the earth any Christian and civilized people so destitute of

everything as the mass of the people of Ireland?” In 1741 the

cemeteries were too small for the burial of the multitudes who died of

hunger.

In 1778, while we were struggling for freedom from English tyranny,

Lord Nugent declared, in the House of Commons, that the people of

Ireland were suffering all the destitution and misery which it is

possible to human nature to endure. Nine-tenths of them earned no more

than fourpence a day, and had no nourishment but potatoes and water.

In 1817 the fever, brought on by hunger, attacked one million five

hundred thousand persons――nearly half of the entire population of the

country. In 1825, 1826, 1830, 1832, 1838, 1846 to 1850, and finally in

1860, 1861, and 1862, the melancholy cry of multitudes dying of hunger

was heard throughout the land. In 1843 Thackeray, travelling in

Ireland, declared that “men were suffering and starving by millions”;

and a little later we know from the most accurate statistics that more

than a million of the Irish people died of hunger within a period of

two years. The history of Ireland is, we are persuaded, the sublimest

and the saddest of all histories. It has never been written, and the

grandest of themes awaits the creative power that will give it

immortal life on the pictured page. It will be written in the English

language, and it will link the English name and tongue for all time

with the greatest social crime which one people ever committed against

another. In another article we hope, by the aid of the faint and

glimmering light that shines so fitfully in this blackness, to be able

to trace the doubtful and devious way along which this providential

race seems to be slowly rising into the promise of a better day. For

the present we shall conclude with a quotation from De Beaumont, whose

careful and conscientious studies on the _Social, Political, and

Religious Condition of Ireland_ we recommend to all who are interested

in this subject.

“I have seen,” he wrote in 1835, “the Indian in his forests and the

negro in chains, and I thought, in beholding their pitiable state,

that I saw the extreme of human misery; but I did not then know the

fate of poor Ireland. Like the Indian, the Irishman is poor and naked;

but he lives, unlike the savage, in the midst of a society which

revels in luxury, and adores wealth. Like the Indian, he is deprived

of every material comfort which human industry and the commerce of

nations procure; but, unlike him, he is surrounded by fellow-creatures

who are enjoying all that he is forbidden even to hope for. In the

midst of his greatest misery the Indian retains a kind of independence

which is not without its charm and its dignity. Destitute as he is,

and famishing, he is yet free in his wilderness; and the consciousness

of this freedom softens the hardships of life. The Irishman suffers

the same destitution without having the same liberty. He is subject to

laws, has all kinds of fetters; he dies of hunger, and is under rule;

deplorable condition, which combines all the evils of civilization

with the horrors known elsewhere only to the savage! Doubtless the

Irishman who has shaken off his chains, and still has hope, is less to

be pitied than the negro slave. Nevertheless he has to-day neither the

liberty of the savage nor the bread of the slave.”[194]

[191] “A View of the State of Ireland,” by Edmund Spenser.

[192] _History of the United States_, vol. v. chap. iv. p.

73.

[193] _History of England_, vol. v. p. 45.

[194] _L’Irlande: Sociale, Politique et Religieuse._ Par

Gustave de Beaumont, Membre de l’Institut. Tom. i. p. 222.

A MARCH PILGRIMAGE.

On Provence’ hills the touch of southern spring――

No laggard she with footstep faltering――

Awoke with sunny blessing drowsy earth,

Filled soft green glades with carollings of mirth.

In western lands, o’er turbulent seas afar,

Inclement March, with blustering notes of war,

Through naked trees whirled fruitless flowers of snow

All scentless drifting to the earth below.

Alike on Provence’ violet-studded fields,

And that bright land where loath fond winter yields,

Hung the gray shadow of a solemn Lent――

The church’s sorrow with spring’s promise blent.

Yet, breaking through the penitential shade,

With shining altars in glad white arrayed,

In those far, frosty lands the church’s voice

Bid, with all joyousness, her sons rejoice.

Through the deep, Lenten sadness of her song

Notes strong and jubilant swift poured along:

The long-hushed “Gloria” wond’ring echoes woke,

The angels’ chant the mournful silence broke.

Without, the wild and gusty whirls of snow;

Within, the throng of reverent knees bent low,

And faithful hearts, that from their dear green isle

Brought Patrick’s faith to make their new home smile――

In rich possession of the “Unknown God”;

Blessing the rivers and the prairies broad

With cities populous and cross-crowned spires,

And ever-kindling sanctuary fires.

So rose, exultant, on the bleak March day

The joyous notes across Lent’s sombre way:

Adoring souls, before the altar shrine,

Thanking for Patrick’s faith their Lord divine.

Not Provence’ blossoms such glad music woke

Though happy birds in spring-time laughter broke;

Veiled the sad altar in its purple pall,

And church and people, sorrow-laden all.

Yet joyful echoes from that western land

Spoke ’mid the lapsing waves on Nice’s strand;

Stirred, with the broken sweetness of that praise,

The heart of one who, through long busy days

Of years unresting, had with patience toiled,

With love and zeal, to keep his flock unsoiled

Amid the strong new world’s tumultuous life.

With such persuasion his wise words were rife

As if the grace of Savoy’s bishop-saint

Were his to loving guide the weak and faint;

As if, like Padua’s dear saint benign,

He bore the burden of the Child divine.

He saw afar his Irish children kneel,

The clinging reverence of their hearts reveal;

Longing with them his fervent prayer to pour,

He sought St. Honorat’s pine-girdled shore――

There treading where St. Patrick trod of old,

When gathered his young heart the words of gold

That should for heaven’s King a new realm win――

A faithful fold no wolf should enter in.

Here rose the chapel where the young saint prayed,

Here thoughtful paced he Lerins’ learnèd shade.

Ruined the abbey ’mid its olives rests,

Wide open all its doors to pilgrim guests――

Though still the chapel keeps its purpose old,

And Lerins’ vines and olives still enfold

A cloister shade where constant prayer ascends,

And Benedictine lore with labor blends.

Here, with all holy memories possessed,

With loving thoughts of that sea-severed West,

The pilgrim knelt――in that peace-shadowed place

Mingling his prayers with Ireland’s tearful race.

Kneeling afar at shrine his hand had raised,

While hearts, his lips had taught, St. Patrick praised,

In love, ’neath western clouds and Provence’ sun,

The Latin priest and Celtic flock were one.

O great St. Patrick! each day grows more wide

The realm thou winnest that thy Lord may bide,

A King revered on royal altar throne,

In patient love abiding with his own.

Pray thou that this beloved land of ours,

Strong in her youth and undeveloped powers,

One day with that true beauty may be crowned,

That girds thy island’s mournful brows around――

The beauty of true faith in Christ, her Lord,

Who in her lavish hands such wealth has poured:

Win thou for her great heart’s best heritage

The steadfast bearing of faith’s strongest age.

Oh! win her stars for beacon-light to guide

The restless wanderers from the Cross’s side,

Gracious in pure, unfaltering light arrayed――

The earthly shadow of the Heavenly Maid.

Pray that her hands be ever raised to bless

Meek hearts whose prayer wins her such comeliness;

Pray that her soul for evermore be free,

Signed with the chrism of true liberty.

SIX SUNNY MONTHS.

BY THE AUTHOR OF “THE HOUSE OF YORKE,” “GRAPES AND THORNS,” ETC.

Catholic World, Vol. 24, October, 1876, to March, 1877 A Monthly Magazine of General Literature and Science · 第 5 / 7 章