ACT V.――The curtain rises on a prison chamber in the Tower, where

Northumberland, jubilant over his certain liberation, calls upon Jane

and Guilford to rejoice at their renascent fortunes. The pure-souled

Jane refuses the crown once for all, and endeavors to lead her husband

and his father to proper gratitude for the reprieve. But in the midst

of Dudley’s “merry mood” Fakenham enters with a warrant――and not the

document so confidently looked for. It is now Northumberland’s turn to

despair; and the struggles of his soul, at the prospect of speedy

death, are depicted with great force. Hitherto, during his

imprisonment, he has been pretending to let Fakenham convert him. Now

he sees the necessity of conversion indeed, yet clings to the hope of

respite as the gain of professing the true Faith.

At the scaffold Pembroke meanly stings him into rage; but this

obnoxious person being removed, the arch-rebel seems to turn his

attention in earnest to the salvation of his soul, and after a prayer,

which sounds perfectly sincere, kneels to Fakenham for absolution,

then hurriedly ascends the scaffold. The scene closes, and a cannon is

heard――the appointed signal that the head has fallen.

The fate of Lady Jane Grey is next determined. Mary is strongly

inclined to spare her. Gardiner is to blame for the adverse decision.

Fakenham, however, obtains a promise that she shall be spared if she

abjure her heresy. But Mary, in the fifth scene, shows a sudden

tenderness for her doomed cousin, and, after a fit of raving

melancholy, sends Fakenham in all haste to bring her. It is too late.

Guilford has just been executed, and his widow is being led forth even

while the queen demands her presence. The sixth scene gives us the

parting of Jane and her mother, and closes as the victim of another’s

ambition heroically ascends the scaffold. In the last scene Mary

reaches Jane’s prison to find her gone, and rushes to the window in

the hope of signalling the executioner, but only in time to see him

hold up the severed head.

* * * * *

We shall now introduce our readers to some of the best passages from

this play. Our only difficulty will be to restrict their number within

necessary limits, for there is not a page but invites quotation. Here

is a fine bit of description to begin with. It is from the opening

scene. Sir Thomas Wyatt is amazed to learn that the king is “sick to

death.”

“WYATT. How can it be? But one short month it seems

Since I beheld him on his jennet’s back,

With hawk on wrist, his bounding hounds beside,

Charge up the hillside through the golden gorse,

Swallowing the west wind, till his cheeks glowed out

Like ripened pears. The whirring pheasant sprang

From the hedged bank; and, with a shout, in air

The bright boy tossed his falcon; then, with spur

Pressed to his jennet’s flank, and head thrown back,

And all the spirit of life within his eye

And voice, he drew not rein, till the spent quarry

Lay cowering ’neath the hawk’s expanded wings.”

To us, this dash into description, at the very beginning of the play,

shows how thoroughly our author feels himself at home. Had he not been

a conscious master of his art, he would scarcely have made such a

venture, for fear of exciting the suspicion that his talent lay in the

direction of descriptive rather than of dramatic poetry. As it is,

Wyatt’s burst of eloquence lends much to the easy strength of this

first scene.

We are little prepared, however, for the daring feat of two heroines:

each heroine enough to have the play to herself, yet neither

overshadowing the other. So lovely is the character of Lady Jane Grey,

and so keenly are our sympathies enlisted on her side, that we are

astonished to find any room left in our hearts for Mary Tudor;

whereas, in fact, so royal the latter’s bearing, so truly is she

“every inch a” queen, so indisputable are her rights, so outrageous

her wrongs, that we end by seeing only her noble qualities, and even

forgive her Jane Grey’s death.

The poet introduces Lady Jane at that post where woman is always “a

ministering angel”――by the death-bed of her cousin, King Edward. She

has been reading him to sleep, and he has just awaked.

“JANE. How fares your Highness now?

EDWARD. Thy sweet voice, Jane,

Soothes every pain. A film grew o’er mine eyes:

A murmur, as of breezes on the shore,

Or waters lapping in some gelid cave,

Coiled round my temples, and I slept.”

This gives our author an opportunity of bringing out Jane’s modesty

and humility――the very un-Protestant virtues with which he has chosen

to adorn his favorite heroine conspicuously.

“JANE. Ah, cousin!

Not in my voice the charm. Within this volume

A sanatory virtue lives enshrined,

As in Bethesda’s pool.

EDWARD. By an angel stirred.”

An answer no less just than felicitous.

Again, in the same scene, the guilelessness of her soul shines out in

her protest against being made heir to the crown. The pretext put

forth by Northumberland and Cranmer for persuading Edward to sign away

the throne from his sisters is the safety of the Protestant

cause――what Anglicans impudently call “the true church.” Jane, though

an earnest adherent of the new religion, will have nothing to do with

evil measures in its behalf.

“JANE. O no! not me! This remediless wrong

I have no part in. Edward, you have sisters.

Great Harry’s daughters, England’s manifest heirs.

Leave right its way, and God will guard his own.”

But now it is Mary’s turn to win our admiration. She comes upon the

scene the moment after the weak Edward has signed away the kingdom to

Jane. Unaware of the injury that has been done her, she greets her

“dear lost brother” with true sisterly affection, but, in another

minute, shows the Tudor in her veins by the courage with which she

confronts Dudley and tells the traitor she knows him at his worth.

Then, discovering the plot against her, she rises――suddenly but with

calmest dignity――to the attitude of queen, as though the crown had

just been placed upon her head instead of stolen for another’s.

“EDWARD. It is now too late――too late!

I have done what it were well had ne’er been done.

JANE. O would to God that act might be recalled!

MARY. What act?

JANE. That makes me queen.

MARY. Thou queen! O never

Shall regal crown clasp that unwrinkled brow!

Thou queen? Go, girl――betake thee to thy mappets!

Call Ascham back――philosophize――but never

Presume to parley with gray counsellors,

Nor ride forth in the front of harnessed knights!

_Leave that to me, the daughter of a king._”

Equally worthy is her reply to the insolent Dudley when he dares to

offer her the crown on condition of her “renouncing her errors”:

“MARY. Sir, have you done? Simply I thus reply.

Not to drag England from this slough of treason――

Nor save this lady’s head――nor yours, archbishop――

Not even my brother’s life――would I abjure

My faith, and forfeit heaven!”

But sublimer even than this avowal of her faith is the act of charity

she presently makes after her brother’s spirit has departed; and in

nothing has the poet done her so much justice:

“MARY. And thou art gone! hast left me unforgiven!

O brother! was this righteous? Gloomier now

This dreary world frowns on me, and its cares

Womanly dreams, farewell! Stern truths of life

Stamp on my heart all that becomes a queen.

Dudley, you have dared much: yet, standing here

By my poor brother’s clay, _I can forgive_.

Will you kneel, Dudley?”

After this, let the poet depict Jane in the most attractive colors he

can find, he has shown his Catholic heroine the greater woman. But, in

fact, we are convinced this is his aim. For although, as a Protestant,

he makes Jane become a saint (according to his idea of saintship), her

“path a shining light that goeth forward and increaseth to perfect

day”――while Mary’s way is over-clouded to the end, and cruel wrongs

goad her into rage which rouses all the Tudor and all the Spaniard in

her nature, and deepens her melancholy into madness――still, even in

her most painful moments, the daughter of Catherine is _great_. Her

enemies do homage to her greatness. Northumberland himself is forced

to say of her, in the scene we have quoted from above:

“The eighth Harry’s soul lives in her voice and eye.”

But the spell of her majestic bearing is best portrayed in the scene

where she meets the rebel leaders Wyatt and Brett with their

followers. Sir Thomas Wyatt, true to his character as indicated in the

first scene, indulges again in fine rhetoric, declaring that he and

his men have decided to stand for Mary, but putting in the condition

that “all things which touch the Church” shall “rest as King Edward

left them.” The queen answers this appeal by another to the

consciences of “English gentlemen,” demanding for her own the liberty

she willingly extends to theirs; but when, presently, Wyatt insults

her by raving, like a modern fanatic, about “the dogs of persecution,

insatiate brood of Rome,” and Brett sullenly refuses to march with her

to London, she passes on, leaving the two insurrectionists to pay her

tribute each in his own fashion.

“BRETT. Now, by all saints and martyrs calendared!

I could half worship such a tameless woman,

All shrewish though she be. With what a spirit,

Like thunder-riven cloud, her wrath poured forth,

And keen words flared! Ugly and old?――to that

I shall say nay hereafter. Autumn moons

Portend good harvests. Yet, that glance at parting

Flashed fierce as sunset through a blasted tree!

But hey! look yonder, Wyatt: half your men

Are scampering after her.

WYATT. I marked, and blame not.

I mar no fortune, and coerce no conscience.

_There is a fascination――all have felt it――

When Royalty and Woman join in one:

Austere allegiance softening into love;

And new-born fealty clinging to the heart,

Like a young babe that front its mother’s bosom

Looks up and smiles._”

(Here let us ask, if these lines we have italicized were quoted

anonymously, who would not take them for Shakspere’s?)

“BRETT. Trust me, I am much minded

To join her even yet.

WYATT. It cannot be.

I feel as you do: but I look beyond

The tempting present. _She goes forth to conquer:

So strong a heart must conquer._”

Mary’s affection for her sister Elizabeth is sincere and tender; while

Elizabeth’s for her, on the other hand, has a dubious quality. It is

strange that Sir Aubrey shows no enthusiasm over Elizabeth. He appears

to have learnt too much truth about her. Mary’s first inquiry, after

reaching Framlingham in her flight from Dudley’s machinations, is for

her sister:

“Why is Elizabeth not here to greet me?

Command her to the presence.”

And when the princess enters, and, kneeling, says, “Queen, sister!”

Mary’s joy at seeing her is very touching.

“To my arms! Pardie, sweet Bess,

You daily grow more stately. _Your great brows

Like our cathedral porches, double-arched,

Seem made for passage of high thought._”

A part of this scene is particularly fine.

“MARY. Never was kind counsel needed more

By aching heart. Little you know my trials.

The fleetness of my horse scarce saved my life;

And I am queen in nothing but the name!

O sister, canst thou love me? Thou her child――

Beautiful Boleyn’s daughter――who destroyed

My mother――hapless queen, dishonored wife!

Thou too, my brother――spurned from thy throne, thy death-bed!

O no! I shall go down into my earth

Desolate, unbeloved!――I wound thee, sister!

Pardon! I rave――I rave――

ELIZABETH. Abate this passion!

In very truth I love you――fondly pity――

MARY. Pity! not pity――give me love or nothing.

_I hope not happiness: I kneel for peace._

But no: this crown traitors would rive from me――

Which our great father Harry hath bequeathed

Undimmed to us――a righteous heritage――

This crown which we, my sister, must maintain

Or die: this crown, true safeguard of our people,

Their charter’s seal――crushes our peace for ever.

_All crowns, since Christ wore His, are lined with thorns._”

And again, as the melancholy gains upon her:

“MARY. Am I mad?

Think you I’m mad? I have been used to scorn,

Neglect, oppression, self-abasement, aye――

_My mother’s scorching heritage of woe!_

Ha! as I speak, behold, she visits me,

With that fair choir of angels trooping round her,

And cherub faces, with expanded wings

Upbearing her! O blessed Saint, depart not!

_Breathe on my cold lips those still cherished kisses

Which thine in death impressed! Sigh in mine ear

Those half-articulate blessings, unforgotten,

Which made my childhood less than martyrdom!_

I’ll clasp thee――mother!

[_Totters forward and falls._]”

Surely this, too, is worthy of Shakspere. And so is Northumberland’s

soliloquy with which the third Act opens; so much so, indeed, that we

can with difficulty persuade ourselves we are not reading Shakspere.

“I have plunged too deep. The current of the times

Hath been ill-sounded. _Frosty discontent

Breathes chilly in the face of our attempt_:

And, like the dry leaves in November winds,

_These summer-suited friends fly my nipped branches_.

What’s to be done? Time like a ruthless hunter,

Tramples my flying footsteps! Banned and baited

By my own pack, dogs fed from mine own hand

Gnash fangs and snarl on me.”

What is peculiarly Shaksperian here is the profusion of metaphors. It

is a sign of a great poet to deal freely with metaphors. We know how

Byron heaps them up in _Childe Harold_, and Tennyson in _In Memoriam_.

Another proof of high genius――especially dramatic――is the ready use of

wit and sarcasm. We have a passage of arms between Dudley and

Courtenaye which is very masterly.

Dudley, having lost his way in the Tower, gets the headsman to show

him to Courtenaye’s cell.

“EXETER. Ha! I should know that face; and lackeyed thus

By yon grim doomster, guess my coming fate.

NORTHUMBERLAND. I greet you well, Marquis of Exeter,

Noble Plantagenet!

EXETER. Hey, what means this?

The half-forgotten name, and fatal heritage!

Sir John of Dudley――bear and ragged staff――

Or memory fails me.

NORTHUMBERLAND. Now Northumberland.

EXETER. Indeed? Excuse me. _Prisoners limp behind

The vaulting world._ You are welcome.

NORTHUMBERLAND. I would greet you

With tidings of content.

EXETER. Long strangers here.

NORTHUMBERLAND. I take your hand: nor coldly, thus, hereafter

Will you, perchance, vouchsafe it. I have power

(In Edward’s time I only had the will)

To serve you.

EXETER. Ha! how well I guessed the truth!

One king the more is dead. Who now rules England?

_Chaste Boleyn’s babe, or the Arragonian whelp?_

No beauty, I’ll be sworn, unless time makes one.

NORTHUMBERLAND. The house of Grey is of the royal lineage.

To that King Edward’s will bequeathes the crown.

EXETER. My lady duchess queen? Now, God forbid!

NORTHUMBERLAND. All cry amen to that. Her Grace of Suffolk

Yields to her wiser daughter――Lady Jane――

My son, Lord Guilford’s wife: now Queen of England.

EXETER. _O, now I do begin to read the stars,

And note what constellation climbs._ My lord,

Excuse the stiffness of imprisoned knees.

The obsolete posterity of kings

Lowly should bend to kings’ progenitors.

Sir Headsman, art thou married?

HEADSMAN. Nay, my lord.

EXETER. Get thee a wife, then, in good haste: get sons!

_Full-bosomed honor, like a plant in the sun,

Plays harlot to the hour. Lo, thistles burgeon

Even through the Red Rose’ cradle!_

NORTHUMBERLAND. My good lord,

_Unseasonable wit hath a warped edge,

Whereby the unskilful take unlooked for scars._

Good-night. May fancy tickle you in dreams

In which nor Boleyn’s babe (I quote your phrase)

Nor whelp of Arragon――kind heaven forefend!――

Nor our grim friend here, with uncivil axe,

Dare mingle. Good-night, Courtenaye.”

To pass to the trial scene, in the fourth Act, a speech is put

into the mouth of Gardiner――who, as chancellor conducts the

prosecution――which reminds us of the unanswered arguments from Pole

and other Catholic characters in _Queen Mary_:

“GARDINER. My lords, religion was the plea for this.

Religion, a wide cloak for godless knaves.

What! knew they not the Apostolic rule

That men are bound to obey even sinful princes?

Who dares insinuate that our queen’s right rule

Shall be a snare for conscience? Hypocrites!

_Why claim ye toleration, yet refuse it?

Faith your perpetual cry, yet would ye stifle

That faith which is the trust of other hearts._

Your Bible is your idol: _all must bow

Before your exposition of its sense_,

Or forfeit all――the very throne!”

Had our author been a Catholic, he could not have stated the case

better.

Jane Grey pleads guilty so nobly, and prays so generously that her own

life may be taken and her husband’s spared, that Fakenham truly says

of her:

“She rises from the sea of her great trouble

Like a pure infant glowing from the bath.”

Here are some of her words:

“_I wake from the vain dream of a blind sleep_:

Nothing to hide, nothing extenuate.

My lords, reverse to me this good hath brought;

That I who dimly saw now plainly see,

And seeing loathe my fault, and loathing leave it.

_The bolts of heaven have split the aspiring tower

Of my false grandeur; and through every rent

The light of heaven streams in._

* * * * *

In time to come it shall be known, ambition

Was not my nature, though it makes my crime.”

Dudley’s defence would be manly and admirable were it not for his

hypocrisy. But the hour comes when hypocrisy can serve him no longer.

It is a powerful scene――the first of the fifth Act――where his

confident hopes are dashed to the ground for ever. And then he finds

Fakenham――whom he has called “worm” and “dog” before, and for whom his

hatred never could contain itself――his best friend and only succor. He

seems, indeed (so well is his character sustained throughout), to

cling to the hope of saving his bodily life by accepting the Catholic

faith, till he stands on the very scaffold; but there he drops

simulation.

“The terrible ‘to be’ is come! Time’s past!

Yet all’s to do――_an age crammed to a span!

Time, never garnered till thy last sands ebb,

How shall my sharp need eke thy wasted glass,

Or wit reverse it?_”

Lady Jane meets death like a martyr. Her resignation is shown as early

as the third scene of the third Act, while she is in the Tower with

her husband awaiting further tidings after learning that their cause

is lost.

“JANE. Midnoon, yet silent as midnight! My heart

Flutters and stops――flutters and stops again――

As in the pauses of a thunder-storm,

Or a bird cowering during an eclipse.

Alone through these deserted halls we wander,

Bereft of friends and hope. Speak to me, Guilford.

GUILFORD. Thy heart-strings, Jane, strengthened by discipline,

Endure the strain.

JANE. Say rather, my religion

Has taught this good. _Nor lacks our female nature

Courage to meet inevitable woe

With a beloved one shared._”

And again her generosity comes out:

“We have obscured a dawn. If spared, God grant

We may make bright the queen’s triumphant way

Like clouds that glorify the wake of noon.”

She, too, sees the “true minister of Christ” in Fakenham:

“Fearless of danger in discharge of duty,

And to the mourner prodigally kind.”

Such Protestants as she are never formal heretics: they have too much

humility. When Fakenham is pleading her cause with the Tudor, who

displays for a season the vindictiveness of woman against woman, Jane

disallows his attestation of her innocence:

“Ah, sir, too gently have you judged me!

Usurper of the consecrated crown.

The sacred sceptre, how can I be pure?

_Welcome Adversity, lifter up of veils!_

Before me, _naked as a soul for judgment_,

Stands up my sin. ’Tis well! the worst is o’er.

Suffer I must; but I will sin no longer.”

When, in the fifth Act, she approaches the scaffold, she alone is

firm, she alone makes no complaint against the justice of her

sentence, but, on the contrary, defends it.

“BEDINGFIELD. Madam,

We fain would linger on the way. Our eyes,

Blind though they be with tears, strain round to catch

Some signal of reprieve.

JANE. O, seek it not!

It cannot be. _My life may not consist

With the realm’s safety._ Innocent am I

In purpose; but the object of great crimes.

Good blood must still flow on till Jane’s be shed.”

So again, in her final address to the spectators:

“My sentence hath been just: _not for aspiring

Unto the crown, but that, with guilty weakness,

When proffered I refused it not._ From me

Let future times be warned that _good intent

Excuseth not misdeeds: all instruments

Of evil must partake its punishment_.”

In the meantime Mary softens somewhat after Dudley’s execution, and is

inclined to spare Guilford, as well as Jane. Gardiner argues against

the husband’s reprieve, on the ground of certain peril to throne,

church, and commonweal; and here he carries his point easily. He is

not successful in securing Jane’s doom, even though he tells the queen:

“She is proclaimed

From street to street. The very walls are ciphered

With traitorous scrolls that hail her ‘Jane the Queen.’

Shall such wrong go unchecked?

MARY. That is their folly;

Not hers. The culpable shall smart for this.”

But here Bedingfield enters hastily to announce the escape of Suffolk

and his having “joined with Wyatt.”

“MARY. Suffolk fled? Jane’s father?

Henceforth let justice rule. Farewell, weak pity!

We cannot, Jane, both live: why, then, die thou!”

Yet, even after this, her good genius, Fakenham, obtains from Mary a

promise that Jane shall live “if she abjure her heresy.” It does not

appear, however, that Fakenham had any further interview with Jane. It

would have been useless, if he had; for when, just before her

execution, Bedingfield says:

“At least, we may delay till the dean comes

To whisper spiritual comfort,”

Jane replies:

“Infinite

Is the Almighty’s goodness. In that only

I put my trust. My time, sir is too short

For controversy: and that good man’s duty

Compels him to dispute my creed. I thank him:

Pray you, sir, say I thank him, from my heart,

For all his charities. In privacy

My prayers――not unacceptable, I trust,

To God my Saviour――have been offered up.

So must they to the end.”

But in the scene before the execution――one of singular power――the

unhappy queen evinces a yearning for sympathy which triumphs over

rigor, and, in spite of Gardiner’s presence, makes her relent, though

too late.

First we see her alone. She is vindicating herself to her conscience:

“I have no thirst for blood; nor yet would shrink

From shortening earthly life: for what is life

That we should court its stay? A pearl of price

In festal days, but mockery to mourners.

What’s life to thee, thy loved one dead, poor Jane?

What’s life to me, by him I loved betrayed?

I take from thee what is no loss to thee

And much infects the realm. Gladly would I

My life on such conditions sacrifice.

_The time for thy short widowhood is come:

But ye shall reunite above. For me

The heart’s blank widowhood must be for ever.

Jane! on thy block the throned queen envies thee!_”

She is full of her own betrayal by Courtenaye――a wrong which has left

a more cruel wound than all the plots of treason have effected.

Here Gardiner and Fakenham enter to announce that Brett and Wyatt are

taken. Presently, after a burst of fevered excitement, she says:

“I want

To see Jane Grey-after her widowhood.

FAKENHAM [_aside_]. After?――She then shall live.

GARDINER [_aside_]. Observe, she raves.

MARY. We’ll sit together in some forest nook,

_Or sunless cavern by the moaning sea_,

And talk of sorrow and vicissitudes

Of hapless love, and luckless constancy;

And hearts that death or treachery divides.”

She then goes off into a fit of raving, and declares that “the spirit

of the fatal Sisterhood riots in her veins,” and “the snakes of the

Eumenides brandish their horrent tresses round her head.” Fakenham

suggests music as the remedy for her “sick mind”; and Gardiner bids

him throw aside the gallery doors that open on the chapel. It being

the hour for service, the choir is heard.

“[_As the music proceeds, the queen’s stupor relaxes, and her

sensibility gradually revives. The music ceases._]

MARY. Airs fresh from heaven breathe round me!

Sing on, bright angels! tears relieve my heart――

My brain is calmed. Sing on and let me weep.

[_A pause._

Would they were saved! Alas, poor widowed one!

Can it not still be done? No, no――too late!”

Then she describes the “dark procession” of Guilford to the scaffold,

as seen in a vision. The signal gun is heard. The head has fallen.

“MARY. He is no more! Great God,

Have mercy upon both!

GARDINER. Her thoughts are changed:

Her brain relieved.

FAKENHAM. Now plead for Jane!

GARDINER. Too late!

Hear yonder bell.

MARY. What’s that? Again the death-bell?

Hark you! I would have speech with Jane. Fly, Fakenham!

My foot is weak and slow. Gardiner, attend me.

Fly, Fakenham, fly!

FAKENHAM. Too late! too late! too late!”

The scene of Jane’s execution intervenes; and then comes the last

scene, brief and terrible.

“_Jane Grey’s prison in the Tower. An open window

in the rear._

_Enter hurriedly_ MARY _followed by_ GARDINER.

MARY. She’s gone――I come too late――forgive me, God!

Myself I never, never shall forgive.

Ha! from yon casement they may mark a signal!

[_She leans from the window._

Hold! Hold! [_She draws back with a shriek._

Great God! it is――it is――her head

That demon lifts and brandishes before me!

[_She rushes from the window, rubbing her eyes wildly._

Pah! I am choked-my mouth is choked with blood!

My eyes, my nostrils, swim in blood――my hair

Stiffens with blood――the floor is slippery

With blood――all――blood! Mother and unborn babe

Both slain! Mother and child! The cry of blood

Rises to heaven――the curse of Cain is launched

Upon me! Innocent victims! At God’s throne

Already ye bear witness. Mercy, mercy!

_Spare one who knew not how to spare._

[_She kneels._

_Enter_ FAKENHAM.

Ay, kneel

To heaven――and pray! Lift up your hands to God!

Lift up your voice-your heart! Pray, sinner, pray!

[_The curtain falls._”

So ends the first part of this masterly drama, and, we think, the far

finer of the two plays――certainly the less painful to a Catholic

reader. We have given it unqualified praise, because we have dealt

with it purely as a drama. We are afraid that the real Jane Grey was a

much less lovely character than the poet’s, and are thankful to know

that the real Mary Tudor was a very different compound indeed. But we

give the poet credit for perfect sincerity in his delineation of

either character. We believe that if he was consciously partial at

all, it was rather to the Catholic side――from a wish to do Catholics

all the justice in his power. And this but makes us regret the more

that, together with the genius he manifests, he had not the faith of

the gifted son to whom he has left his mantle.

[189] _Mary Tudor: An Historical Drama._ By Sir Aubrey De

Vere, Bart. London: William Pickering. 1875.

A BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF TOLEDO.

“Behold,” said the owl to Prince Ahmed, “the ancient and renowned city

of Toledo――a city famous for its antiquities. Behold those venerable

domes and towers, hoary with time, and clothed with legendary

grandeur, in which so many of my ancestors have meditated.”

We had arrived at the foot of the rocky promontory on which stands

imperial Toledo. The first sight of it is exceedingly impressive. Its

aspect is grave and majestic, and the thousand grand memories that

hover over it add to the fascination. It is the royal city, the

capital of the Gothic kings. For four hundred years it was in

possession of the Moors, and in the middle ages it was so renowned for

its learning as to attract numerous students from foreign parts. It

is, too, _par excellence_, the ecclesiastical city of Spain, and

stands proudly on its seven hills like Rome. The long line of its

bishops comprises many saints, as well as mighty prelates who not only

held spiritual primacy over the land, but took a prominent part in the

political affairs of the nation. It looks just as a city of the middle

ages, with a due sense of the fitness of things, ought to

look――antique, picturesque, and romantic――surrounded by its ancient

walls, from which rise, as if hewn out of the rock, the massive gray

towers that still bear the impress of the Goth and the Moor. Around

its base winds the golden Tagus over its rocky bed, foaming and wildly

raving, in a grand, solemn kind of a way, as if sensible of its high

functions and knowing the secrets of the magic caves that extend

beneath its very bed――caves wrought out of the live rock by the

cunning hand of Tubal, the grandson of Noe, and where Hercules the

Mighty taught the dark mysteries of Egyptian art, handed down to

posterity, and long after known as the _Arte Toledana_. For this

ancient city claims as its founder Tubal, the son of Japhet, who, as

the Spanish chroniclers say, with the memory of the Deluge still fresh

in his mind, naturally built it on an eminence, and hewed out caverns

as places of refuge from the watery element. So remote an origin might

reasonably be supposed enough to satisfy the most owlish of

antiquarians; but some hoary old birds have gone so far as to whisper

that Adam himself was the first king of Toledo; that the sun, at its

creation, first shone over this the true centre of the world; and that

its very name is derived from two Oriental words signifying the Mother

of Cities. However this may be, it was Hercules, the Libyan, who,

versed in the supernatural arts, achieved labors no mere human arm

could have accomplished, who gave the finishing touches to the city,

and set up the necromantic tower of legendary fame, in after-years so

rashly entered by Roderick, the last of the Goths, letting out a flood

of evils that spread over all the land. This was “one of those

Egyptian or Chaldaic piles, storied with hidden wisdom and mystic

prophecy, which were devised in past ages when man yet enjoyed

intercourse with high and spiritual natures, and when human foresight

partook of divination,” and its mysterious fate was worthy of its

origin.

But Toledo did not fully awake to its importance till the fifth

century after Christ, when it fell into the hands of the Goths, who

made it their capital and enlarged and embellished it, especially in

the good old times of King Wamba, whose name is still popular in

Castile, and corresponds to that of King Dagobert in France. It now

became renowned for its splendor and wealth, and, when taken by the

Moors at the end of the seventh century, they found here an immense

booty, including the spoils of Alaric from Rome and Jerusalem, among

which was the famous table of talismanic powers, wrought for King

Solomon out of a single emerald by the genii of the East, which had

the power of revealing, as in a mirror, all future events, and from

which that monarch acquired so much of his wisdom.

All these and many other things were flitting through our minds as we

crossed the bridge of Alcantara, with its tower of defence and

tutelary saint, and wound up the steep hillside into the city. We

alighted in the court of the Fonda de Lino, where we learned once more

that an old bird sometimes gets caught with mere chaff. It soon became

alarmingly evident that, between the Goth and the Moor, but little had

been left behind――at least, at the Fonda. But “Affliction is a divine

diet,” says Izaak Walton, and we took to it as kindly as possible. In

this state of affairs, we gave ourselves unresistingly up to a

_valet-de-place_, who lay in wait for his prey, and, for once in the

world, did not regret it; for he proved quite indispensable in the

maze of narrow, tortuous streets, and was tolerably versed in the

archæology of the place. Few cities are more rich in historic,

religious, and poetic memories, or have as many interesting monuments

of the past. At every step we were surprised by something novel and

curious. The streets themselves run zigzag, so that we were always

dodging around a corner, like our old friend Mr. Chevy Slyme, and soon

began to feel very mean and pitiful indeed. This must have been

convenient in days when arrows were weapons, but to honest,

straightforward folk in these pacific times they are peculiarly

trying. One side of you always seems getting in advance of the other,

and you soon begin to feel as if blind of one eye. It is to be hoped

obliquity of the moral sense does not follow from this necessity of

going zigzag. The streets are extremely clean, but so narrow as to

afford passage only to men and donkeys, or men _on_ donkeys, sometimes

looking, in their queer accoutrements, “like two beasts under one

skin,” as Dante says. These sombre, winding streets are lined with

lofty houses that are gloomy and solid as citadels, with few windows,

and these defended by strong iron grates. The portals are flanked with

granite columns and surmounted by worn escutcheons carven in stone.

They are frequently edged with the cannon-ball ornaments peculiar to

Castile, like rows of great stone beads. The doors themselves are so

thick and massive that they have withstood all ancient means of

assault, and the resinous wood of which they are made seems to defy

the very tooth of time itself. They are studded with enormous nails of

forged iron, with diamond-shaped or convex heads, sometimes as large

as half a cocoanut, and curiously wrought. Frequently they are not

content with their primitive forms, but go straying off into long,

artistic ramifications that cover the door like some ancient

embroidery. The gabled ends of the houses often project over the

streets with huge beams, carved and stained, that add to the gloom.

These streets do not seem to have changed for ages. Every instant we

saw some trace of the Goths or an Arabic inscription, or Moorish

galleries and balconies. Once we entered an old archway, and found

ourselves in a court with sculptured granite pillars that supported

Oriental-like galleries, to which we ascended by stairs faced with

colored _azulejos_, old and glittering, as the Moors alone knew how to

make them. Once the city contained two hundred thousand inhabitants;

now there are not more than twenty thousand. The streets are deserted

and silent, the houses empty. Everywhere are ruins and traces of past

grandeur over which nothings of modern life is diffused. You seem to

be wandering in a museum of antiquities. Above all, you feel it was

once, and perhaps still is, a city of deep religious convictions, from

the numerous monasteries and magnificent churches. Pious emblems are

on the houses. Among others, we remember the cord of St. Francis,

carven in stone, with its symbolic knots of the Passion. At the

Ayuntamiento, built after the designs of El Greco, who, like several

other eminent artists, was at once painter, architect, and sculptor,

is an inscription on the side of the staircase by the poet Jorje

Manrique worthy of a place over the entrance of every city-hall: “Ye

noble, judicious lords who govern Toledo, on these steps leave all

your passions――avarice, weakness, fear. For the public good forget

your own private interests; and since God has made you the pillars of

this august house, continue always to be firm and upright.”

We were now near the cathedral――one of the grandest, and certainly the

richest, in Spain. Its first foundation is lost in the obscurity of

legendary times. The people, however, are not so indefinite in their

opinion. With a true Oriental love of the marvellous, they not only

attribute the foundation of Toledo to patriarchal times, but declare

this church was built by the apostles, and that even the Blessed

Virgin herself took a personal interest in its erection. It is at

least certain that a church was consecrated here in the time of King

Ricared the Goth, after the condemnation of the Arians by the Council

of Toledo, and it was probably built on the site of a previous one. It

was placed under the invocation of the Virgin, and her ancient statue,

which has been preserved to this day, was regarded then, as now, with

special veneration. The old Gothic kings were noted for their devotion

to Mary, and hung up at her altar the beautiful crowns of pure beaten

gold and precious stones discovered a few years ago near Toledo, and

now at the Hôtel Cluny at Paris.[190]

The Moors, when they took Toledo, seized this church, so sacred to the

Christians, razed it to the ground, and erected a mosque in its place;

and when Alfonso VI. triumphantly entered the old capital of the

Visigoths, May 25, 1085――the very day the great Hildebrand died at

Salerno, exclaiming: “I have loved justice and hated iniquity, and

therefore I die an exile”――having left the Moors in possession of the

building, he was forced to hear Mass in a little mosque of the tenth

century, afterwards given to the Knights Templars and called the

Christo de la Luz, where may still be seen the wooden shield hung up

by King Alfonso, with its silver cross on a red ground.

The people, of course, were dissatisfied to see the infidel left to

defile a spot where the Gospel had first been announced to their

forefathers and the Christian mysteries first celebrated, and, as soon

as the king left the city, determined to regain possession of it.

Queen Constanza herself, though a native of France, favored the

movement, and had the doors of the mosque forced open in the night.

The archbishop purified it with incense, aspersions, and prayer; an

altar was hastily set up, and a bell hung in the tower, which, after a

silence of four centuries, rang out as soon as daylight appeared, to

call the people to a solemn service of thanksgiving.

Bernard de Sédirac was now Archbishop of Toledo. He belonged to a

noble family of Aquitaine, and became early in life a Benedictine monk

at St. Oren’s Priory, Auch, of which he was soon made prior. This

house was affiliated to the Abbey of Cluny, to which he was

transferred by St. Hugo on account of his talents and eminent virtues,

and when Alfonso VI. sent there for a monk capable of re-establishing

monastic discipline in the convents of Castile, Dom Bernard had the

honor of being appointed to the mission. He found not in the Spanish

monasteries the austerity and silence of Cluny. The neighing of

steeds, the baying of hounds, and the whistle of the falcon prevailed

over the choral chants, and soft raiment had taken the place of

haircloth and the scourge. The monks, however, were by no means

depraved, and Bernard soon acquired such an ascendency over them as to

effect a radical change in their habits, especially at the great Abbey

of San Facundo, of which he had been made abbot.

When Alfonso VI. took Toledo, desirous of restoring the see to its

ancient grandeur and importance, he endowed it magnificently, and

appointed Dom Bernard archbishop. The part this prelate took in the

seizure of the mosque has been alluded to. Mariana, the Jesuit

historian, considers his zeal on this occasion as too lively and

impetuous. The Moors were naturally enraged at losing their chief

place of worship, and for a time it was feared they would break out

into open revolt. But they finally concluded to send a deputation to

the king to make known the violation of the treaty and demand redress.

Alfonso was then in the kingdom of Leon, and, when he learned what had

occurred, he was not only alarmed for the safety of his capital, but

angry with those who had endangered it. He at once set out for Toledo,

resolved to punish the queen and archbishop. When the Christians of

Toledo learned that he was approaching the city in such a disposition

the principal citizens clothed themselves in black, and the clergy put

on their sacred robes, and went forth to meet him. In the midst was

the fair Princess Urraca, pale and trembling, clothed in sackcloth,

with ashes on her head, sent by the queen to appease the king’s anger,

knowing, if anything could turn him from his purpose, it would be the

sight of his favorite daughter. But Alfonso hardened his heart when he

saw them approach, and silently registered a vow not to be moved by

the princess’ entreaties. Urraca had the true tact of a woman, and,

divining her father’s thoughts, fell at his feet, conjuring him to

grant her but one favor――to show no mercy on those who had set at

naught his authority out of obedience to a higher will!

The king was taken aback by this pious stratagem, and, before he

recovered from his embarrassment, a second embassy from the Moors

appeared. The king, in anticipation of their renewed complaints,

exclaimed: “It is not to you the injury has been done, but to me; and

my own interest and glory forbid me to allow my promises to be

violated with impunity.”

The messengers fell on their knees and replied: “The archbishop is the

doctor of your law, and if we, however innocent, be the cause of his

death, his followers will some day take vengeance on us. And should

the queen perish, we shall become an object of hatred to her

posterity, of which we shall feel the effects when you have ceased to

reign. Therefore, O king! we release you from your promise, and beg

you to pardon them. If you refuse our petition, allow us to seek in

another country an asylum from the dangers that threaten us here.”

The king, who had been weighed down with sadness, broke into

transports of joy: “You have not only saved the archbishop, but the

queen and princess. Never shall I forget so happy a day. Henceforth

you may be assured of my special protection.”

When the king entered the city a few hours after, he proceeded

directly towards the mosque taken from the Moors. On the threshold

stood Queen Constanza in garments of mourning, and Dom Bernard in

pontifical vestments. The king kissed the archbishop’s hand, embraced

the queen, and entered the church to give thanks unto God for the

happy ending of so threatening a drama. And so, adds Mariana, this day

of tears and lamentations was changed into a day of joy. This was in

the year of our Lord 1087.

The _Alfaqui_, or Moorish doctor, whose sagacious advice the Moors had

followed on this occasion, was regarded with so much gratitude by the

Christians that they set up his statue in the Holy of Holies, where it

is to be seen to this day among the kings of Spain and the dignitaries

of the church.

The present cathedral was begun by St. Ferdinand in 1227. Eight

portals give entrance to the edifice. The principal one is called the

great Door of Pardon. Seven steps lead up to it, which the people

often ascend on their knees. And to kneel is the attitude one

instinctively takes on entering this magnificent church, which is like

a great jewelled cross of marvellous workmanship. It is, in fact, a

museum of sculpture and painting. The eye is absolutely dazzled by its

richness, as it looks up the long aisles with their clustered columns,

lit up by the finest stained-glass windows in Spain. The choir alone

it would take hours to examine, so profuse are the beautiful carvings.

On the lower stalls――those of the choristers――are carved jousts,

tourneys, battles, and sieges, as if to figure the constant warfare of

man here below. Even the very animals in the accessory carvings are

represented contending. Forty-five of these stalls represent the siege

of some city or fortress in the war with the Moors, and are curious

for the costumes and arms of the time. The most interesting relate to

the conquest of Granada, just after which they were executed. Nor is

it surprising to find such things commemorated in so holy a place. The

war with the Saracens was not merely a national enterprise, but a holy

crusade on which depended, not only the safety of Spain, but of all

Christendom, and Europe has never been sufficiently grateful to the

Spaniards for saving it from the yoke of Islam. These carvings seem

like a psalm of triumph for ever echoed in this choir: “The Lord hath

triumphed gloriously: the horse and his rider hath he thrown into the

sea.” Each panel, labelled with its victory, seems chanting, one after

the other:

“To him which smote great kings:

For his mercy endureth for ever!――

Sihon, the King of the Amorites:

For his mercy endureth for ever!

And Og, the King of Bashan:

For his mercy endureth for ever!

――And hath redeemed us from our enemies:

For his mercy endureth for ever!”

On the upper stalls, where sit the canons of the church between red

marble columns, are the holy mysteries of the faith, carved by

Berruguete and Felipe de Borgoña, and above in alabaster is the

genealogy of Christ. At the head of the choir is the archbishop’s

throne, like the stalls of carved walnut, but supported by bronze

pillars. Among other carvings on it is the legend of St. Ildefonso and

the sacred _Casulla_, so popular at Toledo, and which has inspired the

pencil of Murillo, Rubens, and other eminent artists. St. Ildefonso

was Archbishop of Toledo in the seventh century, and the author of a

famous work entitled _De Virginitate Mariæ_. It is said that one night,

entering the church at the head of his clergy to sing the midnight

office, he found the altar illuminated, and the Blessed Virgin seated

on his ivory throne surrounded by a throng of angels, holding in her

hand the book he had written in defence of her virginity. She beckoned

him towards her, and said, as she bestowed on him a beautiful white

chasuble of celestial woof: “Inasmuch as with a firm faith and a clean

heart, having thy loins girt about with purity, thou hast, by means of

the divine grace shed on thy lips, diffused the glory of my virginity

in the hearts of the faithful, I give thee this vestment, taken from

the treasury of my Son, that even in this life thou mayest be clothed

with the garment of light.” And the attendant angels came forward to

fasten the sacred _Casulla_ around him.

After the time of St. Ildefonso no one ever ventured to use this

chasuble till the presumptuous Sisberto was made archbishop; but he

experienced the fatal effects of his rashness and died a miserable

death in exile. This precious garment was carefully preserved

fifty-seven years at Toledo, and then carried to the Asturias to save

it from the Moors――perhaps by Pelayus when he floated down the Tagus

two hundred and fifty miles in a wooden chest, a second Moses destined

to save his nation:

“The relics and the written works of saints,

Toledo’s treasure, prized beyond all wealth,

Their living and their dead remains,

These to the mountain fastnesses he bore.”

When the church of San Salvador at Oviedo was completed, Alfonso el

Casto had the Santa Casulla solemnly conveyed thither, and there it

remains to this day.

St. Ildefonso and the holy Casulla are to be seen at every hand’s turn

at Toledo. Countless houses have a majolica medallion depicting them

inserted in their front walls. They are sculptured over one of the

doors of the cathedral, and several times within. And among the

numerous paintings that adorn the edifice are two in which the Blessed

Virgin is clothing St. Ildefonso with something of the grace and

majesty of heaven.

But the vision of St. Ildefonso is specially commemorated on the spot

where it occurred by a beautiful little temple of open Gothic work on

one side of the nave. Here the whole legend is admirably told by

Vigarny in a series of bas-reliefs in marble. In the outer wall is

inserted the slab on which the Virgin’s feet rested, protected by an

iron grating. Both the grate and slab are worn by the fingers of the

devout. No one passes without thrusting his hands through the grating

to touch the stone, after which he kisses the tips of his fingers and

makes the sign of the cross.

The _Capilla mayor_ is of excessive richness. Jasper steps lead up to

the high altar. The retable, covered with countless sculptures, rises

almost to the arches, alive with scenes from the life of our Saviour

amid innumerable pinnacles, and niches, and statues of most elaborate

workmanship. Around are the tombs of the ancient kings of Spain, and

among them that of the celebrated Cardinal Mendoza, the _tertius rex_,

who took so prominent a part in the government in the time of

Ferdinand and Isabella――a tomb in the Plateresco style, and worthy,

not only of that great prelate, but of the marvellous chapel in which

it stands. Near by is the effigy of the _Alfaqui_, who interposed in

favor of Queen Constanza and Archbishop Bernard, and opposite is a

statue of San Isidro, who led Alfonso VIII. to victory at Navas de

Tolosa, as well as one of that king himself in a niche. There is

certainly nothing grander in all Christendom than this chapel――nothing

more in harmony with the imposing rites of the church, which are here

celebrated with a majesty that is infinitely impressive.

The chapel of the Sagrario contains the celebrated statue of the

Virgin so honored by the Goths, said to have been saved from the Moors

by an Englishman. It is of wood, black with age, but entirely plated

with silver, excepting the face and hands. This Madonna stands in a

blaze of light from the numerous lamps, and is absolutely sparkling

with jewels. One of her mantles is of silver tissue embroidered with

gold thread (that required three hundred ounces of gold to make) and

thousands of pearls weighing nearly as much. There is scarcely room

for the rubies, emeralds, and diamonds suspended on this mantle. That

of the Child is similar in style, and took nine persons over a year to

embroider.

Near by, in the chapel of Santa Marina, is a tombstone over the

re-mains of Cardinal de Carrero, the king-maker of Philip the Fifth’s

time, with its _Hic jacet pulvis, cinis, et nihil!_――sublime cry of

Christian humility.

Every chapel in this cathedral is worthy of interest. One bears the

curious name of the _Christo de las Cucharas_, or of Spoons, from the

_armes parlantes_ of Diego Lopez de Padilla emblazoned here――three

_padillas_, or little paddles in the form of a spoon. It was a lady of

this family who, in some civil contest, stripped the statues in the

cathedral of their valuable ornaments as a means of defraying the

expenses of the war, but first kneeling before them to beg the saints’

pardon for the liberty she was about to take.

Then there is the beautiful chapel of _Los Reyes Nuevos_, lined with

rich tombs in sculptured recesses, each with its recumbent effigy,

among which is that of a daughter of John of Gaunt, “time-honored

Lancaster,” who married a Spanish prince.

The chapel of Santiago, in the flamboyant style, was built before the

discovery of America, by Alvaro de Luna, grand-master of the Knights

of Santiago. On every side are scallop-shells, emblem of the tutelar,

and the crescent, cognizance of the Luna family. The tomb of the

founder is in the centre, with knights, cut in alabaster, keeping

eternal watch and ward around their chief, who is lying on his tomb;

while monks and nuns that have turned to stone seem to pray for ever

around that of his wife.

The Mozarabic chapel, with its memories of Cardinal Ximenes, is very

interesting. One side of it is entirely covered with a fresco of the

battle of Oran, in which the cardinal took a leading part, full of

animation and vigor. Here the Mozarabic rite which he re-established

is still kept up.

What the primitive form of the Spanish liturgy was we have no certain

knowledge, for it was superseded, or greatly modified, by the Goths.

After the fourth Council of Toledo, presided over by St. Isidore of

Seville, a uniform liturgy was established throughout the kingdom, to

which was given the name of Mozarabic from that of the Christians who

lived under the Moorish rule, and only had permission to maintain

their own rites by the payment of an annual tribute. The Gregorian

liturgy was introduced in the time of Alfonso VI. by the wish of the

pope. The clergy and people were at first in consternation at the

proposed change, but the archbishop, Bernard de Sédirac, was in favor

of it, and he was sustained by the government. Six churches at Toledo

were assigned to the Mozarabic rite, but by degrees the Gregorian

acquired ascendency. Mozarabic books became more and more rare, and

the rite was nearly abandoned when Cardinal Ximenes, in order to

preserve a vestige of it, founded this chapel in the year 1500, and

had the ancient service printed at Alcala de Henares. One peculiarity

of this rite is, the Host is divided into nine parts, which are placed

on the paten in the form of a cross, in memory of the Incarnation,

Nativity, Circumcision, Adoration of the Magi, Passion, Death,

Resurrection, Ascension, and Eternal Reign.

The chapter-room of the cathedral is the richest in Spain. It is

Moorish in style, and has a magnificent _artesonado_ ceiling of gold

and azure, rare carvings in oak, and a profusion of paintings, mostly

portraits of the archbishops of Toledo, ninety-four in number, among

which is that of Carranza, the confessor of Mary Tudor, and such a

favorite of Charles V. that he summoned him to his death-bed at Yuste.

But the best paintings are in the sacristy. Here is the Santa Casulla

on the ceiling, by Luca Giordano, the most productive painter that

ever existed, and on the wall is El Greco’s _chef d’œuvre_――the

casting of lots for Christ’s garment――in which the artist introduced

his own portrait as one of the soldiers. There is also a beautiful

Santa Leocadia rising from her tomb, by Orrente. St. Ildefonso is

cutting off a portion of her veil, according to the legend, which says

that while he was celebrating Mass at the tomb of this saint on her

festival, Dec. 9, in presence of the king and a great crowd, the stone

that covered the tomb, which it took thirty strong men to remove, was

suddenly raised, to the amazement of the assembly, and St. Leocadia

came forth shrouded in her veil. Going to St. Ildefonso, she took him

by the hand and said: “Ildefonso, it is by thee the Queen we serve in

heaven hath obtained victory over her enemies; by thee her memory is

kept alive in the hearts of the faithful.” She then returned to her

tomb, but before it closed on her for ever the archbishop had presence

of mind enough to commend the king and nation to her prayers, and,

taking a knife from the king, cut off a corner of her veil, which is

still preserved in the Ochavo and solemnly exhibited on her festival.

The Ochavo is a fine octagonal room entirely lined with precious

marbles. Here are the silver shrines of St. Eugenius and St. Leocadia,

with silver statues and reliquaries, and countless articles of great

value. The riches of this church are still extraordinary, though the

French carried off more than a ton of silver objects in their day. A

dignitary who officiated in a procession while we were there wore a

magnificent collar, which we afterwards examined. It was absolutely

covered with pearls, rubies, sapphires, emeralds, etc. A man followed

him with a mace, as if to guard it. The silver custodia for the Host,

the largest in the world, weighs four hundred pounds, and is composed

of eighty thousand pieces. It is of the florid Gothic style, and

contains two hundred and sixty-six statuettes. Cardinal Ximenes

ordered it to be made in 1515, but it took nine years to complete it.

There is another of pure gold, weighing thirty-two pounds, which

Isabella the Catholic had made of the first ingots from the New World,

as a tribute to the divine Host. After her death Cardinal Ximenes

bought it and presented it to his cathedral.

The vestments in the sacristy are perhaps unrivalled. Many of them are

hundreds of years old, of rare embroidery that looks like painting,

done on cloth of gold. We remember one cope in particular, on which is

the coronation of Mary, done by hands of fairy-like skill. All the

crowns of the divine personages, as well as their garments, are edged

with real pearls, and the whole scene, though wrought with silk,

seemed to have caught something of the celestial beauty and calm

rapture of Fra Angelico.

We have given only a faint idea of this magnificent cathedral, which

must be seen to be fully appreciated. No wonder the proverb says:

_Dives Toledana_. Leaving the church by the first door at hand, we

saluted the huge San Christobalón, forty feet high, on the wall――saint

of propitious omen, whom we always like to meet.

Catholic World, Vol. 24, October, 1876, to March, 1877 A Monthly Magazine of General Literature and Science · 第 4 / 7 章