The following is a case in point:--

_Druggist._ Smoking not allowed here, sir.

_Customer._ Why! I just bought this cigar from you.

_Druggist._ Well, we also sell emetics and cathartics. That does not

license customers to sit down and enjoy them on the premises.

In the thirteenth year of the reign of James I. of England (and James VI.

of Scotland) the apothecaries and grocers were disunited. The charter,

however, placed the former under the control of the College of Physicians,

who were endowed with the arbitrary powers of inspecting their shops and

wares, and inflicting punishments for alleged neglects, deficiencies, and

malpractices.

The physicians knew so little, that the apothecaries soon were enabled to

cope with them; "and before a generation had passed away the apothecaries

had gained so much, socially and pecuniarily, that the more prosperous of

them could afford to laugh in the face of the faculty, and by the

commencement of the next century they were fawned upon by the younger

physicians, and were in a position to quarrel with the old, which they

soon improved."

As it was a common occurrence for patients to apply at the apothecary's

for a physician, the former either recommended the applicant to one who

favored him, _or else prescribed for the patient himself_. The

promulgation of this fact was the declaration of war with the old

physicians, who heretofore had done their best to keep down the

apothecaries. The former threatened punishment, as provided by law; the

latter retaliated, by refusing to call them in to consult on difficult

cases. "Starving graduates of Oxford and Cambridge, with the certificate

of the college in their pockets, were imbittered by having to trudge along

on foot and see the mean 'medicine mixers,' who had scarce scholarship

enough to construe a prescription, dashing by in their carriages."

The war progressed,--Physician _vs._ Apothecary,--and the rabble joined.

Education sided with the physicians, interest sided with the

apothecaries.

"So modern 'pothecaries taught the art,

By doctors' bills, to play the doctors' part;

Bold in the practice of mistaken rules,

Prescribe, apply, and call their masters fools."

To circumvent the apothecaries, a dispensary was established in the

College of Physicians, where prescriptions were dispensed at cost. While

this proceeding served to lessen the apothecary's income for a time, it

could not greatly benefit the prescribing physician. The former might

parallel his case with Iago, and say of the physician, he

"Robs me of that which not enriches him,

And makes me poor indeed."

Physicians were divided into two classes,--Dispensarians and

Anti-dispensarians. Charges of ignorance, extortion, and of double-dealing

were preferred on both sides. The dispensary doctors charged their

opponents with playing into the hands of the apothecaries by prescribing

enormous doses, often changing their prescriptions uselessly to increase

the druggists' revenues and _their own percentage_! On the other hand, the

dispensarians were accused of charging a double profit on prescriptions

whenever the ignorance of the patient, respecting the value of drugs,

would admit of the extortion.

Had the physicians been united, the apothecaries would have had to

succumb; but a divided house must fall, and the apothecaries won the day.

A London apothecary, having been prosecuted by the college for prescribing

for a patient without a regular physician's advice, carried the case up to

the House of Lords, where he obtained a verdict in his favor; and another

apothecary, Mr. Goodwin, whose goods had been seized by some dispensary

doctors, having obtained a large sum for damages, which being considered

test cases, the doctors from this time (about 1725) discontinued the

exercise of their authority over the apothecaries.

Thus emancipated from the supervision of the physicians, the apothecaries

began to feel their own importance, and most of them prescribed boldly for

patients, without consulting a doctor. The ignorance of many of them was

only equalled by their impudence. It is not unusual, at the present day,

for not only apothecaries, but their most ignorant clerks, to prescribe

for persons, strangers perhaps, who call to inquire for a physician; and

cases, too, where the utmost skill and experience are required.

The following amusing anecdote is sufficiently in accordance with facts

within our own knowledge to be true, notwithstanding its _seeming_

improbability:--

The Funny Side of Physic Or, The Mysteries of Medicine, Presenting the Humorous and Serious Sides of Medical Practice. An Exposé of Medical Humbugs, Quacks, and Charlatans in All Ages and All Countries. · 第 314 / 797 题