THE PRESIDENT: Just one moment. Up to this evening I understood that the

president was to be elected for a year. I do not know much about the

condition prior to President Linton. He was elected at Battle Creek at

the same time I was elected vice president. There were extenuating

circumstances justifying the re-election of President Linton. I feel

that similar conditions do not prevail justifying my re-election as

president of this association. It is not going to make any difference to

me whether I am president or just simply a soldier in the ranks. I want

to see this association the success it ought to be and I feel, in view

of the wonderful work that has been done in this association and for its

best interests at all times by Mr. Jones, that it is due him that the

presidency should be passed to him at this time. He is going to the next

convention of the National Association of Nurserymen, he and Doctor

Morris, Mr. Olcott and Mr. Weber, to get before that convention of

nurserymen something more of the history of this association and its

ambitions and desires. I know he could appear before that convention in

a much more advantageous way for the benefit of this association if he

were president of it. I feel that Mr. Jones ought to be elected

president of this association here tonight.

MR. OLCOTT: Mr. President, the presidents of this association have been

elected for two years and I think it has become an established custom.

THE PRESIDENT: Mr. Bixby referred to that tonight. I didn't understand

it that way. I supposed I was elected last year at Lancaster for one

year.

MR. O'CONNOR: Mr. President, I took that matter up with Mr. Littlepage

and he told me it was customary to elect the president for one year at a

time and to re-elect him for the second year if he proved all right. So

far I think every member of this association has been well satisfied

with the service you have given us and we want you to continue on for

another year.

THE PRESIDENT: Pat, I thought you were my friend.

MR. SPENCER: I move the secretary cast the ballot of the association in

favor of the officers nominated by the committee on nominations.

MR. O'CONNOR: I second the motion.

(Upon the motion being put to a vote of the members, it was declared

duly CARRIED, the secretary cast one ballot for the persons nominated,

and they were declared duly elected.)

THE PRESIDENT: All right, ladies and gentlemen. Here we are with our

coats off and sleeves rolled up for another year; but I want to give you

all fair warning that if we don't have that thousand memberships at that

next convention, this child is going to drop out. (Laughter.)

The next in the order of business is the selection of a place for the

next convention. You heard the telegram this morning from Mr.

Littlepage and the telegram from the Washington Chamber of Commerce.

Personally, I would like to have you come to Rochester again because we

sure enough have enjoyed the sessions with you all here this time. There

is no finer city in the world than Rochester, N. Y., and we would like

to have you come back here. I want you to come here.

MR. O'CONNOR: Mr. President, I feel it is quite an honor that we are

asked to the capital city of the United States to hold our meeting. It

shows we were appreciated there some few years ago. I move you we have

the next meeting in Washington.

MR. OLCOTT: I second the motion.

(The motion being duly put to a vote of the members, it was carried.)

THE SECRETARY: Now, Mr. President, we should decide upon a date.

THE PRESIDENT: I think that is true. In Lancaster, last year, it was

held later than this. I believe the ordinary time has been considerably

later than this, about a month.

MR. O'CONNOR: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Littlepage asked me to say, after the

convention city had been selected, that it would be best to make it

about the last week in September as that would show the pecans and

walnuts at about the right time.

MR. BIXBY: I move that the time of the next convention be fixed at

September 26th, 27th and 28th, 1923.

MR. O'CONNOR: I second the motion.

(The motion being put to a vote of the members, it was declared

CARRIED.)

There being no further business to come before the Convention, it

thereupon adjourned.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TREE PLANTING CEREMONIES AT HIGHLAND PARK, ROCHESTER,

N. Y.

_September 9th, 1922, 11 A. M._

PRESIDENT MCGLENNON: This occasion represents the custom of the

association of planting a nut tree in one of the parks of the community,

in which the annual convention is held. We had expected to have some

black walnut seedlings grown from nuts presented to ex-President Linton

by the superintendent at Mount Vernon, Washington's old home. I am not

sure but I have quite a vivid remembrance that the trees from which

these nuts were gathered were fruiting in Washington's time. However it

would be a very delightful time if we could have such trees to plant in

memory of that great character. But I am sorry to say that we have been

disappointed in not receiving the trees from Mr. Linton. He expressed

them from Saginaw the day before yesterday and we have made diligent

effort to locate them in this city this morning but have been unable to

get any trace of them. Anticipating such a happening Mrs. Ellwanger, who

had on exhibition at the convention some Persian walnuts grown in pots,

at our request very kindly consented to let us use one of those trees.

If we had had a little more time to consider it undoubtedly Mr. Dunbar

would have arranged to have this tree planted on the land that was given

to the city by George Ellwanger, Mrs. Ellwanger's father-in-law, and

Patrick Barry of the world famed nursery of Ellwanger & Barry. We are

going to plant one of these Persian walnut trees here (the planting is

now going on) and there is a greater likelihood that this tree will live

than the black walnut, as that tree had to be dug and transported. We

feel reasonably sure that this tree will live to commemorate our meeting

in Rochester this year.

We are also going to plant an Arkansas hickory, that Mr. Dunbar has had

dug from the park nursery, a short distance from where the walnut is

planted. I think this, too, is an appropriate tree to plant because of

the success of the hickory in this community. Mr. Dunbar tells me that

practically all of the varieties of hickory of North America are planted

on this park slope. We took great pleasure in driving through here the

other day and listening to an explanation of their history by Mr.

Dunbar.

We are honored today by the presence of the Dean of the New York State

School of Forestry, Dean Mann, who has consented to address us. It gives

me great pleasure to introduce to you Dean Mann.

DEAN MANN: President McGlennon, ladies and gentlemen:

I assure you it gives me great pleasure to be here because as a forester

and tree lover by profession I am also a tree lover by nature. I can

conceive of no more worthy, more beautiful nor attractive memorial than

a tree dedicated to the Father of our Country, something which will grow

in size, in beauty and in productivity as the years roll by. As

foresters would remind you, ladies and gentlemen, the Father of our

Country served his apprenticeship long before he became a land owner and

patriarch on those broad Virginia acres. The Father of our Country

started out in life as a forester and surveyor. You may remember that he

piloted, or was to be one of the pilots of Braddock's expedition, having

gained his knowledge of the woods through his early life as a young

surveyor in the forests of Virginia.

There are in New York state approximately fourteen million acres better

suited to tree crop production than to field crop production. Here in

the northeastern corner of the United States, where our great centers of

population are found, we have in the state of Maine seventy per cent

suited to tree crop production but unsuited to tillage; we have similar

conditions in Massachusetts and Connecticut. Throughout this

northeastern section of the country we have a tree soil domain which

will grow trees and which can't be plowed with profit. All who are

interested in the production of trees for whatever purpose should

realize that this nation cannot permanently prosper unless every acre of

its land is put to its best permanent use.

I think that you will agree with me that it requires no prophetic eye to

see the day not far distant when we will have, stretching from the

Island of Manhattan up to where Albany now stands, one vast series of

teeming cities with suburb touching suburb. The problem then will be how

to feed this multitude. Developments in Russia show that, no matter how

idealistic one's theory of government may be, food, in the last

analysis, is the thing which makes or breaks a nation.

Those of you who have studied some of the interpreters of early

Scripture will remember, perhaps, that the Garden of Eden was in reality

an oasis of trees in the great valley of Mesopotamia, and even today

"garden" in the oriental term means a group of trees. It has been proven

by experience in these different tropical realms that where tree

production is biggest and nuts and other products are grown under

intensive cultivation, an acre will produce more food than where grazing

is practiced. I spent a very pleasant year in California and saw some of

the operations of the California nut growers, where they are growing

English walnuts on a most extensive scale. I believe I will be making no

false statement when I say that those areas in southern California which

are growing nuts produce more in fats, proteins and calories for the

maintenance of the health and strength of the human race than do the

acres which are given up to the growing of animal crops.

So I applaud the idea of planting a tree in the memory of the Father of

his Country. I believe I belong to your group, at least through

interest, because I have been doing a little experimenting of my own in

my back yard at Syracuse where I have an English walnut which I planted

in 1915 which is this year producing for the first time. I am going to

take those nuts and see what can be done with them in perpetuating that

particular variety, because it is hardy, fast growing, and early to

mature.

The New York State College of Forestry has a platform as broad as the

entire state. We are interested in every kind of land which is not

suited to agriculture, fish, game, recreation, conservation of water,

and I pledge to you the sympathy and the support of the New York State

College of Forestry. We have three experiment stations; one in Oneida

county, one in Onandaga county, and another in Cattaraugus, with a

fourth in St. Lawrence, if you wish to call it such. We would be

delighted to receive from you any slip or any sort of fruit which you

wish us to try out at these experiment stations. I believe that the time

will come when some combined system of forestry and horticulture can be

maintained which will aim at the production of food stuffs from trees,

with lumber, perhaps, as a by-product. That works out in the old country

and the day is not far off when it can be practiced here.

I congratulate the members of this association on having completed what

was, from all accounts, a most successful meeting. I regret that I

couldn't have been here earlier and met the other members of your body.

I congratulate you; I wish you God speed, and I again tender the support

of the College of Forestry.

* * * * *

PRESIDENT MCGLENNON: We certainly have received great encouragement from

Dean Mann's remarks, which to me, and I believe to all present, were

most interesting and instructive.

I want to hear just a few words from our esteemed friend, Mr. John

Dunbar, Assistant Superintendent of Parks.

MR. DUNBAR: I think it is a very happy and fortunate circumstance that

Mr. Mann is here this morning representing the College of Forestry of

Syracuse. Every word that Mr. Mann has said is absolutely true. The

forestry question of this country is indeed a very serious question.

Every man, and every woman, should give most serious thought to it, and

I hope the words Dean Mann has spoken to us here this morning will go in

to all our hearts very deeply.

Of course the Park Department is studying trees from the ornamental and

arboricultural point of view. We think, however, that arboriculture,

horticulture and forestry, as the Dean said, are very, very closely

allied and should surely work together. I think his idea is a very

excellent one; that there should be a very close connection or union

between forestry, horticulture, nut culture, and all kinds of fruit

culture. I hope that day is not far distant.

PRESIDENT MCGLENNON: Ladies and gentlemen, the treasurer of our

association is a man who is intensely interested in nut culture. He has

done wonderful things for its advancement and especially for the

advancement of the interests of the Northern Nut Growers Association.

MR. BIXBY: While Dean Mann was speaking the thought came to me, how

could we better co-operate with the Department of Forestry? I think the

work of the Nut Growers Association, which is particularly interested in

the use of nut trees for orchards, and that of the Department of

Forestry, which looks upon them particularly as producers of timber,

could be very closely allied. The thought came to me, could not we right

here work out some practical suggestion whereby we two could co-operate?

I would like to ask Dean Mann what nut trees they are planting for

forest purposes.

DEAN MANN: We have done very little. We have, at our experiment station

at Chittenango, done some work with the English walnuts. This

particularly hardy specimen that I have in my own back yard--I have two,

one of them is growing very slowly--are from our experiment station. We

have really had so much to do in the way of popular education in New

York State in the timber products, that we are merely, as they say in

the South, fixing to begin with other things. That is the only species

with which we have made an actual start. There is this however: what can

foresters, horticulturists and nut enthusiasts do to supply the place of

the American chestnut? I really came here as a seeker after truth on

this particular phase. You men probably know more about it than I. What

can we produce? Is there any hybrid which can be introduced into this

country which will take the place of the American chestnut?

MR. BIXBY: In reply to that I would say that I have hundreds of

seedlings of the Chinese chestnut on which the blight has been working

for years and has not destroyed them. I would be very glad to send them

to the College of Forestry and let you try them.

DEAN MANN: They will be planted with extreme care and a barbed wire put

around them.

MR. BIXBY: There is another thing, the rough shell Japanese walnut,

so-called, which is really a butternut hybrid. I have planted it and it

is growing at a tremendous rate, even faster than the Japanese walnut. I

expect to get a lot of those nuts this year and I wondered how the

College of Forestry would like to try some of them.

DEAN MANN: I would be delighted.

MR. BIXBY: Then there is one other nut the big shell bark hickory which

is a native of the Mississippi Valley, which has been planted in

Pennsylvania and up in Lockport, New York. It grows finely, it bears

early, and I think that it might be worth trying.

DEAN MANN: We have adopted this platform: "Anything which will interest

the people of New York State." We must, as a state institution, limit

our horizon very largely to the state of New York. We do slip over

occasionally, but anything which will interest the people of New York

State in trees of any kind, for any purpose, is a step towards forest

conservation. Take your city dweller in New York City, get him

interested in a shade tree in front of his apartment house, or in a

group of shade trees in the adjoining park, and you have converted that

man along the line of King Forest. So we will be very glad to take any

seeds you have and give them excellent care.

NUTS THE NATURAL AND ADEQUATE SOURCE OF PROTEIN AND FATS

_By_

JOHN HARVEY KELLOGG, M. D., F. A. C. S.,

_Medical Director of the Battle Creek Sanitarium_

In the writer's opinion, the most important thing which can be done to

promote the nut growing industry is to make clear to men and women

everywhere the necessity for returning to natural and biologic living.

Since he left his primitive state, in his wanderings up and down the

face of the earth to escape destruction by terrific terrestrial

convulsions and cataclysmic changes in climate and temperatures, chilled

during long glacial periods, parched and blistered by tropic heats,

starved and wasted by drouth and famine, man has been driven by ages of

hardships and emergencies to adopt every imaginable expedient to survive

immediate destruction, and in so doing has acquired so great a number of

unnatural tastes, appetites and habits, perversions and abnormalities in

customs and modes of life, that it is the marvel of marvels that he

still survives.

Man no longer seeks his food among the natural products of field and

forest and prepares it at his own hearthstone, but finds it ready to

eat, prepared in immense factories, slaughter-houses, mills, and

bakeries and displayed in palatial emporiums. No longer led by a natural

instinct, as were his remote forebears, in the selection of his

foodstuffs, he finds his dietetic guidance in the advertising columns of

the morning paper, and eats not what Nature prepared for his sustenance,

but what his grocer, his butcher and his baker find most for their

pecuniary interest to purvey to him. The average man no longer himself

plants and tills and harvests the foods which enter into his bill of

fare, that is, "earns his bread by the sweat of his brow," but accepts

whatever is passed on to him by a long line of producers and purveyors

who do his sweating for him, depriving him of the opportunity of earning

both appetite and good digestion by honest toil. So he resorts to

condiments and ragouts, palate-tickling and tongue-tickling sauces and

nerve-rousing stimulants, as a means of securing the unearned felicity

of gustatory enjoyment.

At the World's Eugenics Congress held in New York last fall, Professor

Davenport expressed the opinion that the human race will ultimately

perish, and Major Darwin, son of Charles Darwin, one of the world's

leading economists, gave expression to similar views. We are evidently

traveling a downhill road and the tide of degeneracy is rising so fast

it will certainly sweep us on to race extinction unless we return to

sane and biologic living. We are primates, not carnivores like the dog,

nor omnivores like the hog. The primates are fruit and nut eaters in

whatever part of the world they are found. All the primates adhere to

the family bill of fare. The gorilla, reigning king of beasts in the

forests of the Congo, his somewhat lesser relative, the chimpanzee,

which tenants a wide area of the Dark Continent, the orang-utan of

Borneo, and the gibbon of tropical Asia, diversified as they are in form

and habitat, are all equally circumspect in their adherence to the diet

of nuts and fruits, tender shoots and soft grains, foods which Nature

has prescribed as the primate's bill of fare.

A return to natural eating would doubtless do, to say the least, as much

as any one thing toward checking the downward race movement, and no one

who has ever studied the economics of diet will question that the only

way in which the earth's dense populations of the future can be fed will

be by the elimination of the flesh-pots and a resumption of the natural

dietary. This is clear when we recall the fact that the Agricultural

Experiment Stations have demonstrated that 33 pounds of digestible

foodstuffs are required to make one pound of beef. When an animal is

fattened, the creature uses a large part of the food which it consumes

for its own purposes. The eater of flesh does not get back the original

corn and other foods given to the animal but only a small fraction of

it; and hence dense populations can only indulge in beef eating by

importing meats from other countries not yet fully occupied. Evidently,

the present rapid increase of the earth's population will soon bring us

to a point where this enormous waste must cease. Flesh eating will have

to be abandoned for economic reasons. Even the milk supply will

necessarily be limited, for we are compelled to feed the cow 5 pounds of

digestible foodstuffs to obtain 1 pound of water-free food in the form

of milk.

Those pessimistic economists who predict that by the year 2000 the

American Continent will be so densely populated that means will have to

be adopted to limit the increase of population because of the scarcity

of foodstuffs, are evidently not aware of the activities of the Nut

Growers Association and of the marvelous efficiency of nut trees as

producers of protein and fats, the two elements of our foodstuffs which

are most costly because hardest to produce.

I am creditably informed that one acre of land supporting 35 black

walnut trees in full bearing, will produce not less than 350 pounds of

walnut meats, each pound of which has a nutritive value in protein and

fats fully four times that of an equal weight of beef or an equivalent

of 1400 pounds of meat. To produce a steer weighing 1600 pounds,

requires two acres and two years. Two acres and two years will produce

1400 pounds of nut meats, the equivalent of 5600 pounds of beef or more

than 9 times the amount of nutritive material in the form of protein and

fat produced by beef raising.

Of course, the question might be raised whether nuts as a source of food

are equal in value to meats, which supply the same sort of food

material, namely, protein and fats. If the anthropologists are right,

this is a question which need not worry us, for, according to Professor

Keith, the eminent English anatomist and a leading paleontologist, and

Professor Elliot, of Oxford, nuts were the chief staple of our hardy

ancestors of prehistoric times. Professor Elliot, indeed, tells us in

his work, "Prehistoric Man," that the first representatives of the human

race who appeared in the Eocene Period were fruit and nut eaters, and

were abundantly supplied with this sort of nutriment. This eminent

author says,--

"On the bushes by the rivers and along the shore there were all sorts of

fruits and nuts. For the subsistence of our lemur-monkey-man in the

early stages of evolution, what fruits would seem _a priori_ most

suitable?

"I think that one would select the banana and bread-fruit. Ancestral

forms of both were flourishing in the Eocene. Many other fruits with

which man has been afterwards continually (perhaps one might venture to

say _most intimately_) associated, occur at this period. These are, most

of them, found in so many places that one is apt to think they were then

of world-wide distribution.

"In the temperate brushwood and on the river-sides, acorns, hazel-nut,

hawthorne, sloe, cherry and plum might be found. Here and there, he

might alight upon a walnut or an almond; figs also of one kind or

another seem to have been common. Palm trees existed, and some of them

were of enormous size."

If, in modern times, nuts have come to be used as a luxury rather than

as a staple article of diet, it must be because we have neglected to

cultivate this choicest of food products which Nature is ready to

provide with a lavish hand when invited to do so by our co-operation.

But as the public become better informed respecting the high food value

of nuts and especially in view of the steadily rising cost of flesh

meats, the nut is certain to gain higher appreciation, and the writer

has no doubt that some time in the future nuts will become a leading

constituent of the national bill of fare and will displace the flesh

meats which today are held in high esteem but which in the broader light

of the next century will be regarded as objectionable and inferior

foods, and will give place to the products of the various varieties of

nut trees which will be recognized as the choicest of all foods.

In nutritive value the nut far exceeds all other food substances; for

example, the average number of food units per pound furnished by half a

dozen of the more common varieties of nuts is 3231 calories while the

average of the same number of varieties of cereals is 1654 calories,

half the value of nuts. The average food value of the best vegetables is

300 calories per pound and of the best fresh fruits grown in this

country, 278 calories. The average value of the six principal flesh

foods is 810 calories per pound or one-fourth that of nuts.

Northern Nut Growers Association Report of the Proceedings at the 13th Annual Meeting Rochester, N.Y. September, 7, 8 and 9, 1922 · 第 11 / 13 段