CHRIST'S HOSPITAL FIVE AND THIRTY YEARS AGO

In Mr. Lamb's "Works," published a year or two since, I find a

magnificent eulogy on my old school,[1] such as it was, or now appears

to him to have been, between the years 1782 and 1789. It happens,

very oddly, that my own standing at Christ's was nearly corresponding

with his; and, with all gratitude to him for his enthusiasm for the

cloisters, I think he has contrived to bring together whatever can be

said in praise of them, dropping all the other side of the argument

most ingeniously.

I remember L. at school; and can well recollect that he had some

peculiar advantages, which I and others of his schoolfellows had not.

His friends lived in town, and were near at hand; and he had the

privilege of going to see them, almost as often as he wished, through

some invidious distinction, which was denied to us. The present worthy

sub-treasurer to the Inner Temple can explain how that happened. He

had his tea and hot rolls in a morning, while we were battening upon

our quarter of a penny loaf--our _crug_--moistened with attenuated

small beer, in wooden piggins, smacking of the pitched leathern jack

it was poured from. Our Monday's milk porritch, blue and tasteless,

and the pease soup of Saturday, coarse and choking, were enriched

for him with a slice of "extraordinary bread and butter," from the

hot-loaf of the Temple. The Wednesday's mess of millet, somewhat less

repugnant--(we had three banyan to four meat days in the week)--was

endeared to his palate with a lump of double-refined, and a smack of

ginger (to make it go down the more glibly) or the fragrant cinnamon.

In lieu of our _half-pickled_ Sundays, or _quite fresh_ boiled beef

on Thursdays (strong as _caro equina_), with detestable marigolds

floating in the pail to poison the broth--our scanty mutton crags on

Fridays--and rather more savoury, but grudging, portions of the same

flesh, rotten-roasted or rare, on the Tuesdays (the only dish which

excited our appetites, and disappointed our stomachs, in almost equal

proportion)--he had his hot plate of roast veal, or the more tempting

griskin (exotics unknown to our palates), cooked in the paternal

kitchen (a great thing), and brought him daily by his maid or aunt! I

remember the good old relative (in whom love forbade pride) squatting

down upon some odd stone in a by-nook of the cloisters, disclosing the

viands (of higher regale than those cates which the ravens ministered

to the Tishbite); and the contending passions of L. at the unfolding.

There was love for the bringer; shame for the thing brought, and the

manner of its bringing; sympathy for those who were too many to share

in it; and, at top of all, hunger (eldest, strongest of the passions!)

predominant, breaking down the stony fences of shame, and awkwardness,

and a troubling over-consciousness.

I was a poor friendless boy. My parents, and those who should care for

me, were far away. Those few acquaintances of theirs, which they could

reckon upon being kind to me in the great city, after a little forced

notice, which they had the grace to take of me on my first arrival

in town, soon grew tired of my holiday visits. They seemed to them

to recur too often, though I thought them few enough; and, one after

another, they all failed me, and I felt myself alone among six hundred

playmates.

O the cruelty of separating a poor lad from his early homestead! The

yearnings which I used to have towards it in those unfledged years!

How, in my dreams, would my native town (far in the west) come back,

with its church, and trees, and faces! How I would wake weeping, and

in the anguish of my heart exclaim upon sweet Calne in Wiltshire!

To this late hour of my life, I trace impressions left by the

recollection of those friendless holidays. The long warm days of

summer never return but they bring with them a gloom from the haunting

memory of those _whole-day-leaves_, when, by some strange arrangement,

we were turned out, for the live-long day, upon our own hands, whether

we had friends to go to, or none. I remember those bathing-excursions

to the New-River, which L. recalls with such relish, better, I think,

than he can--for he was a home-seeking lad, and did not much care

for such water-pastimes:--How merrily we would sally forth into the

fields; and strip under the first warmth of the sun; and wanton like

young dace in the streams; getting us appetites for noon, which

those of us that were pennyless (our scanty morning crust long since

exhausted) had not the means of allaying--while the cattle, and the

birds, and the fishes, were at feed about us, and we had nothing to

satisfy our cravings--the very beauty of the day, and the exercise

of the pastime, and the sense of liberty, setting a keener edge upon

them!--How faint and languid, finally, we would return, towards

nightfall, to our desired morsel, half-rejoicing, half-reluctant, that

the hours of our uneasy liberty had expired!

It was worse in the days of winter, to go prowling about the streets

objectless--shivering at cold windows of printshops, to extract a

little amusement; or haply, as a last resort, in the hope of a little

novelty, to pay a fifty-times repeated visit (where our individual

faces should be as well known to the warden as those of his own

charges) to the Lions in the Tower--to whose levée, by courtesy

immemorial, we had a prescriptive title to admission.

L.'s governor (so we called the patron who presented us to the

foundation) lived in a manner under his paternal roof. Any complaint

which he had to make was sure of being attended to. This was

understood at Christ's, and was an effectual screen to him against the

severity of masters, or worse tyranny of the monitors. The oppressions

of these young brutes are heart-sickening to call to recollection. I

have been called out of my bed, and _waked for the purpose_, in the

coldest winter nights--and this not once, but night after night--in

my shirt, to receive the discipline of a leathern thong, with eleven

other sufferers, because it pleased my callow overseer, when there has

been any talking heard after we were gone to bed, to make the six

last beds in the dormitory, where the youngest children of us slept,

answerable for an offence they neither dared to commit, nor had the

power to hinder.--The same execrable tyranny drove the younger part of

us from the fires, when our feet were perishing with snow; and, under

the cruelest penalties, forbad the indulgence of a drink of water,

when we lay in sleepless summer nights, fevered with the season, and

the day's sports.

There was one H----, who, I learned, in after days, was seen expiating

some maturer offence in the hulks. (Do I flatter myself in fancying

that this might be the planter of that name, who suffered--at Nevis,

I think, or St. Kits,--some few years since? My friend Tobin was the

benevolent instrument of bringing him to the gallows.) This petty Nero

actually branded a boy, who had offended him, with a red hot iron; and

nearly starved forty of us, with exacting contributions, to the one

half of our bread, to pamper a young ass, which, incredible as it may

seem, with the connivance of the nurse's daughter (a young flame of

his) he had contrived to smuggle in, and keep upon the leads of the

_ward_, as they called our dormitories. This game went on for better

than a week, till the foolish beast, not able to fare well but he must

cry roast meat--happier than Caligula's minion, could he have kept

his own counsel--but, foolisher, alas! than any of his species in the

fables--waxing fat, and kicking, in the fulness of bread, one unlucky

minute would needs proclaim his good fortune to the world below;

and, laying out his simple throat, blew such a ram's horn blast, as

(toppling down the walls of his own Jericho) set concealment any

longer at defiance. The client was dismissed, with certain attentions,

to Smithfield; but I never understood that the patron underwent any

censure on the occasion. This was in the stewardship of L.'s admired

Perry.

Under the same _facile_ administration, can L. have forgotten the cool

impunity with which the nurses used to carry away openly, in open

platters, for their own tables, one out of two of every hot joint,

which the careful matron had been seeing scrupulously weighed out for

our dinners? These things were daily practised in that magnificent

apartment, which L. (grown connoisseur since, we presume) praises so

highly for the grand paintings "by Verrio, and others," with which it

is "hung round and adorned." But the sight of sleek well-fed blue-coat

boys in pictures was, at that time, I believe, little consolatory to

him, or us, the living ones, who saw the better part of our provisions

carried away before our faces by harpies; and ourselves reduced (with

the Trojan in the hall of Dido)

To feed our mind with idle portraiture.

L. has recorded the repugnance of the school to _gags_, or the fat

of fresh beef boiled; and sets it down to some superstition. But

these unctuous morsels are never grateful to young palates (children

are universally fat-haters) and in strong, coarse, boiled meats,

_unsalted_, are detestable. A _gag-eater_ in our time was equivalent

to a _goul_, and held in equal detestation.--suffered under the

imputation.

--'Twas said

He ate strange flesh.

He was observed, after dinner, carefully to gather up the remnants

left at his table (not many, nor very choice fragments, you may credit

me)--and, in an especial manner, these disreputable morsels, which

he would convey away, and secretly stow in the settle that stood at

his bed-side. None saw when he ate them. It was rumoured that he

privately devoured them in the night. He was watched, but no traces

of such midnight practices were discoverable. Some reported, that, on

leave-days, he had been seen to carry out of the bounds a large blue

check handkerchief, full of something. This then must be the accursed

thing. Conjecture next was at work to imagine how he could dispose

of it. Some said he sold it to the beggars. This belief generally

prevailed. He went about moping. None spake to him. No one would play

with him. He was excommunicated; put out of the pale of the school.

He was too powerful a boy to be beaten, but he underwent every

mode of that negative punishment, which is more grievous than many

stripes. Still he persevered. At length he was observed by two of his

school-fellows, who were determined to get at the secret, and had

traced him one leave-day for that purpose, to enter a large worn-out

building, such as there exist specimens of in Chancery-lane, which are

let out to various scales of pauperism with open door, and a common

staircase. After him they silently slunk in, and followed by stealth

up four flights, and saw him tap at a poor wicket, which was opened by

an aged woman, meanly clad. Suspicion was now ripened into certainty.

The informers had secured their victim. They had him in their toils.

Accusation was formally preferred, and retribution most signal was

looked for. Mr. Hathaway, the then steward (for this happened a little

after my time), with that patient sagacity which tempered all his

conduct, determined to investigate the matter, before he proceeded to

sentence. The result was, that the supposed mendicants, the receivers

or purchasers of the mysterious scraps, turned out to be the parents

of ----, an honest couple come to decay,--whom this seasonable supply

had, in all probability, saved from mendicancy; and that this young

stork, at the expense of his own good name, had all this while been

only feeding the old birds!--The governors on this occasion, much

to their honour, voted a present relief to the family of ----, and

presented him with a silver medal. The lesson which the steward read

upon RASH JUDGMENT, on the occasion of publicly delivering the medal

to ----, I believe, would not be lost upon his auditory.--I had left

school then, but I well remember ----. He was a tall, shambling youth,

with a cast in his eye, not at all calculated to conciliate hostile

prejudices. I have since seen him carrying a baker's basket. I think

I heard he did not do quite so well by himself, as he had done by the

old folks.

I was a hypochondriac lad; and the sight of a boy in fetters, upon the

day of my first putting on the blue clothes, was not exactly fitted

to assuage the natural terrors of initiation. I was of tender years,

barely turned of seven; and had only read of such things in books, or

seen them but in dreams. I was told he had _run away_. This was the

punishment for the first offence.--As a novice I was soon after taken

to see the dungeons. These were little, square, Bedlam cells, where a

boy could just lie at his length upon straw and a blanket--a mattress,

I think, was afterwards substituted--with a peep of light, let in

askance, from a prison-orifice at top, barely enough to read by. Here

the poor boy was locked in by himself all day, without sight of any

but the porter who brought him his bread and water--who _might not

speak to him_;--or of the beadle, who came twice a week to call him

out to receive his periodical chastisement, which was almost welcome,

because it separated him for a brief interval from solitude:--and here

he was shut up by himself of _nights_, out of the reach of any sound,

to suffer whatever horrors the weak nerves, and superstition incident

to his time of life, might subject him to.[2] This was the penalty for

the second offence.--Wouldst thou like, reader, to see what became of

him in the next degree?

The culprit, who had been a third time an offender, and whose

expulsion was at this time deemed irreversible, was brought forth, as

at some solemn _auto da fe_, arrayed in uncouth and most appalling

attire--all trace of his late "watchet weeds" carefully effaced, he

was exposed in a jacket, resembling those which London lamplighters

formerly delighted in, with a cap of the same. The effect of

this divestiture was such as the ingenious devisers of it could

have anticipated. With his pale and frighted features, it was

as if some of those disfigurements in Dante had seized upon

him. In this disguisement he was brought into the hall (_L.'s

favourite state-room_), where awaited him the whole number of his

school-fellows, whose joint lessons and sports he was thenceforth to

share no more; the awful presence of the steward, to be seen for the

last time; of the executioner beadle, clad in his state robe for the

occasion; and of two faces more, of direr import, because never but

in these extremities visible. These were governors; two of whom, by

choice, or charter, were always accustomed to officiate at these

_Ultima Supplicia_; not to mitigate (so at least we understood it),

but to enforce the uttermost stripe. Old Bamber Gascoigne, and Peter

Aubert, I remember, were colleagues on one occasion, when the beadle

turning rather pale, a glass of brandy was ordered to prepare him for

the mysteries. The scourging was, after the old Roman fashion, long

and stately. The lictor accompanied the criminal quite round the hall.

We were generally too faint with attending to the previous disgusting

circumstances, to make accurate report with our eyes of the degree

of corporal suffering inflicted. Report, of course, gave out the

back knotty and livid. After scourging, he was made over, in his

_San Benito_, to his friends, if he had any (but commonly such poor

runagates were friendless), or to his parish officer, who, to enhance

the effect of the scene, had his station allotted to him on the

outside of the hall gate.

These solemn pageantries were not played off so often as to spoil

the general mirth of the community. We had plenty of exercise and

recreation _after_ school hours; and, for myself, I must confess,

that I was never happier, than _in_ them. The Upper and the Lower

Grammar Schools were held in the same room; and an imaginary line only

divided their bounds. Their character was as different as that of the

inhabitants on the two sides of the Pyrennees. The Rev. James Boyer

was the Upper Master; but the Rev. Matthew Field presided over that

portion of the apartment, of which I had the good fortune to be a

member. We lived a life as careless as birds. We talked and did just

what we pleased, and nobody molested us. We carried an accidence, or

a grammar, for form; but, for any trouble it gave us, we might take

two years in getting through the verbs deponent, and another two in

forgetting all that we had learned about them. There was now and then

the formality of saying a lesson, but if you had not learned it, a

brush across the shoulders (just enough to disturb a fly) was the sole

remonstrance. Field never used the rod; and in truth he wielded the

cane with no great good will--holding it "like a dancer." It looked

in his hands rather like an emblem than an instrument of authority;

and an emblem, too, he was ashamed of. He was a good easy man, that

did not care to ruffle his own peace, nor perhaps set any great

consideration upon the value of juvenile time. He came among us, now

and then, but often staid away whole days from us; and when he came,

it made no difference to us--he had his private room to retire to, the

short time he staid, to be out of the sound of our noise. Our mirth

and uproar went on. We had classics of our own, without being beholden

to "insolent Greece or haughty Rome," that passed current among

us--Peter Wilkins--the Adventures of the Hon. Capt. Robert Boyle--the

Fortunate Blue Coat Boy--and the like. Or we cultivated a turn for

mechanic or scientific operations; making little sun-dials of paper;

or weaving those ingenious parentheses, called _cat-cradles_; or

making dry peas to dance upon the end of a tin pipe; or studying the

art military over that laudable game "French and English," and a

hundred other such devices to pass away the time--mixing the useful

with the agreeable--as would have made the souls of Rousseau and John

Locke chuckle to have seen us.

Matthew Field belonged to that class of modest divines who affect

to mix in equal proportion the _gentleman_, the _scholar_, and the

_Christian_; but, I know not how, the first ingredient is generally

found to be the predominating dose in the composition. He was engaged

in gay parties, or with his courtly bow at some episcopal levée, when

he should have been attending upon us. He had for many years the

classical charge of a hundred children, during the four or five first

years of their education; and his very highest form seldom proceeded

further than two or three of the introductory fables of Phædrus. How

things were suffered to go on thus, I cannot guess. Boyer, who was the

proper person to have remedied these abuses, always affected, perhaps

felt, a delicacy in interfering in a province not strictly his own.

I have not been without my suspicions, that he was not altogether

displeased at the contrast we presented to his end of the school.

We were a sort of Helots to his young Spartans. He would sometimes,

with ironic deference, send to borrow a rod of the Under Master, and

then, with Sardonic grin, observe to one of his upper boys, "how neat

and fresh the twigs looked." While his pale students were battering

their brains over Xenophon and Plato, with a silence as deep as that

enjoined by the Samite, we were enjoying ourselves at our ease in our

little Goshen. We saw a little into the secrets of his discipline, and

the prospect did but the more reconcile us to our lot. His thunders

rolled innocuous for us; his storms came near, but never touched us;

contrary to Gideon's miracle, while all around were drenched, our

fleece was dry.[3] His boys turned out the better scholars; we, I

suspect, have the advantage in temper. His pupils cannot speak of him

without something of terror allaying their gratitude; the remembrance

of Field comes back with all the soothing images of indolence, and

summer slumbers, and work like play, and innocent idleness, and

Elysian exemptions, and life itself a "playing holiday."

Though sufficiently removed from the jurisdiction of Boyer, we were

near enough (as I have said) to understand a little of his system.

We occasionally heard sounds of the _Ululantes_, and caught glances

of Tartarus. B. was a rabid pedant. His English style was crampt to

barbarism. His Easter anthems (for his duty obliged him to those

periodical flights) were grating as scrannel pipes.[4]--He would

laugh, ay, and heartily, but then it must be at Flaccus's quibble

about _Rex_--or at the _tristis severitas in vultu_, or _inspicere in

patinas_, of Terence--thin jests, which at their first broaching could

hardly have had _vis_ enough to move a Roman muscle.--He had two wigs,

both pedantic, but of differing omen. The one serene, smiling, fresh

powdered, betokening a mild day. The other, an old discoloured,

unkempt, angry caxon, denoting frequent and bloody execution. Woe to

the school, when he made his morning appearance in his _passy_, or

_passionate wig_. No comet expounded surer.--J.B. had a heavy hand. I

have known him double his knotty fist at a poor trembling child (the

maternal milk hardly dry upon its lips) with a "Sirrah, do you presume

to set your wits at me?"--Nothing was more common than to see him make

a head-long entry into the school-room, from his inner recess, or

library, and, with turbulent eye, singling out a lad, roar out, "Od's

my life, Sirrah," (his favourite adjuration) "I have a great mind to

whip you,"--then, with as sudden a retracting impulse, fling back into

his lair--and, after a cooling lapse of some minutes (during which

all but the culprit had totally forgotten the context) drive headlong

out again, piecing out his imperfect sense, as if it had been some

Devil's Litany, with the expletory yell--"_and I WILL, too._"--In

his gentler moods, when the _rabidus furor_ was assuaged, he had

resort to an ingenious method, peculiar, for what I have heard, to

himself, of whipping the boy, and reading the Debates, at the same

time; a paragraph, and a lash between; which in those times, when

parliamentary oratory was most at a height and flourishing in these

realms, was not calculated to impress the patient with a veneration

for the diffuser graces of rhetoric.

Once, and but once, the uplifted rod was known to fall ineffectual

from his hand--when droll squinting W---- having been caught putting

the inside of the master's desk to a use for which the architect had

clearly not designed it, to justify himself, with great simplicity

averred, that _he did not know that the thing had been forewarned_.

This exquisite irrecognition of any law antecedent to the _oral_ or

_declaratory_, struck so irresistibly upon the fancy of all who

heard it (the pedagogue himself not excepted) that remission was

unavoidable.

L. has given credit to B.'s great merits as an instructor. Coleridge,

in his literary life, has pronounced a more intelligible and ample

encomium on them. The author of the Country Spectator doubts not to

compare him with the ablest teachers of antiquity. Perhaps we cannot

dismiss him better than with the pious ejaculation of C.--when he

heard that his old master was on his death-bed--"Poor J.B.!--may all

his faults be forgiven; and may he be wafted to bliss by little cherub

boys, all head and wings, with no _bottoms_ to reproach his sublunary

infirmities."

Under him were many good and sound scholars bred.--First Grecian of

my time was Lancelot Pepys Stevens, kindest of boys and men, since

Co-grammar-master (and inseparable companion) with Dr. T----e. What

an edifying spectacle did this brace of friends present to those who

remembered the anti-socialities of their predecessors!--You never met

the one by chance in the street without a wonder, which was quickly

dissipated by the almost immediate sub-appearance of the other.

Generally arm in arm, these kindly coadjutors lightened for each

other the toilsome duties of their profession, and when, in advanced

age, one found it convenient to retire, the other was not long in

discovering that it suited him to lay down the fasces also. Oh, it

is pleasant, as it is rare, to find the same arm linked in yours

at forty, which at thirteen helped it to turn over the _Cicero De

Amicitia_, or some tale of Antique Friendship, which the young heart

even then was burning to anticipate!--Co-Grecian with S. was Th----,

who has since executed with ability various diplomatic functions at

the Northern courts. Th---- was a tall, dark, saturnine youth, sparing

of speech, with raven locks.--Thomas Fanshaw Middleton followed him

(now Bishop of Calcutta) a scholar and a gentleman in his teens. He

has the reputation of an excellent critic; and is author (besides

the Country Spectator) of a Treatise on the Greek Article, against

Sharpe.--M. is said to bear his mitre high in India, where the _regni

novitas_ (I dare say) sufficiently justifies the bearing. A humility

quite as primitive as that of Jewel or Hooker might not be exactly

fitted to impress the minds of those Anglo-Asiatic diocesans with a

reverence for home institutions, and the church which those fathers

watered. The manners of M. at school, though firm, were mild, and

unassuming.--Next to M. (if not senior to him) was Richards, author of

the Aboriginal Britons, the most spirited of the Oxford Prize Poems; a

pale, studious Grecian.--Then followed poor S----, ill-fated M----! of

these the Muse is silent.

Finding some of Edward's race

Unhappy, pass their annals by.

Come back into memory, like as thou wert in the day-spring of thy

fancies, with hope like a fiery column before thee--the dark pillar

not yet turned--Samuel Taylor Coleridge--Logician, Metaphysician,

Bard!--How have I seen the casual passer through the Cloisters stand

still, intranced with admiration (while he weighed the disproportion

between the _speech_ and the _garb_ of the young Mirandula), to hear

thee unfold, in thy deep and sweet intonations, the mysteries of

Jamblichus, or Plotinus (for even in those years thou waxedst not

pale at such philosophic draughts), or reciting Homer in his Greek,

or Pindar--while the walls of the old Grey Friars re-echoed to the

accents of the _inspired charity-boy_!--Many were the "wit-combats,"

(to dally awhile with the words of old Fuller,) between him and C.V.

Le G----, "which two I behold like a Spanish great gallion, and an

English man of war; Master Coleridge, like the former, was built far

higher in learning, solid, but slow in his performances. C.V.L., with

the English man of war, lesser in bulk, but lighter in sailing, could

turn with all tides, tack about, and take advantage of all winds, by

the quickness of his wit and invention."

Nor shall thou, their compeer, be quickly forgotten, Allen, with the

cordial smile, and still more cordial laugh, with which thou wert wont

to make the old Cloisters shake, in thy cognition of some poignant

jest of theirs; or the anticipation of some more material, and,

peradventure, practical one, of thine own. Extinct are those smiles,

with that beautiful countenance, with which (for thou wert the _Nircus

formosus_ of the school), in the days of thy maturer waggery, thou

didst disarm the wrath of infuriated town-damsel, who, incensed by

provoking pinch, turning tigress-like round, suddenly converted by

thy angel-look, exchanged the half-formed terrible "_bl----_," for a

gentler greeting--"_bless thy handsome face_!"

Next follow two, who ought to be now alive, and the friends of

Elia--the junior Le G---- and F----; who impelled, the former by

a roving temper, the latter by too quick a sense of neglect--ill

capable of enduring the slights poor Sizars are sometimes subject to

in our seats of learning--exchanged their Alma Mater for the camp;

perishing, one by climate, and one on the plains of Salamanca:--Le

G----, sanguine, volatile, sweet-natured; F----, dogged, faithful,

anticipative of insult, warm-hearted, with something of the old Roman

height about him.

Fine, frank-hearted Fr----, the present master of Hertford, with

Marmaduke T----, mildest of Missionaries--and both my good friends

still--close the catalogue of Grecians in my time.

[Footnote 1: Recollections of Christ's Hospital.]

[Footnote 2: One or two instances of lunacy, or attempted suicide,

accordingly, at length convinced the governors of the impolicy of

this part of the sentence, and the midnight torture to the spirits

was dispensed with.--This fancy of dungeons for children was a sprout

of Howard's brain; for which (saving the reverence due to Holy Paul)

methinks, I could willingly spit upon his statue.]

[Footnote 3: Cowley.]

[Footnote 4: In this and every thing B. was the antipodes of his

co-adjutor. While the former was digging his brains for crude anthems,

worth a pig-nut, F. would be recreating his gentlemanly fancy in the

more flowery walks of the Muses. A little dramatic effusion of his,

under the name of Vertumnus and Pomona, is not yet forgotten by the

chroniclers of that sort of literature. It was accepted by Garrick,

but the town did not give it their sanction.--B. used to say of it, in

a way of half-compliment, half-irony, that it was _too classical for

representation_.]

The Works of Charles and Mary Lamb — Volume 2 Elia and The Last Essays of Elia · 第 17 / 155 题