CAUSES OF THE MINNESOTA MASSACRE.

If great public phenomena do not come by chance, then there were causes

for the Minnesota massacres, by the Sioux, in 1862-'3, quite apart from

the aboriginal cruelty and ferocity of the Indian nature. We all know

that the carnal Indian man is a bad enough fellow at the best, and

capable of dreadful crimes and misdemeanors, if only to gratify his whim

or the caprice of the moment. And when he is bent upon satiating his

revenge for some real or imaginary wrong, I would back him in the

horrible ingenuity of his devices for torture, in the unrelenting malice

of his vengeance, against any--the most fierce and diabolical--of all

the potentates in the kingdoms of eternal and immutable evil!

But the white man has always had the advantage of the red man. He was

his superior in knowledge, power, and intellect; and came, for the most

part, of that lordly race, the issue of whose loins already occupy all

the chief countries within the zones of civilization. He knew,

therefore, when he first began to deal with the Indian, what manner of

man he was, what his enlightenment was, and how far it reached out into

the darkness where all is night! He knew that this wild, savage,

untamable redskin could not be approached, reconciled, traded with, or

stolen, from, by adopting, in his case, the usages and courtesies of

civil life, as we understand them, but that his own peculiar laws,

customs, and manners must be studied and conformed to, if any headway

were to be made in his regard and confidence.

At no time, from the beginning to the present day and hour, has any

white man been so fuddled in his wits as to suppose that the Indian

could either act or talk like a clergyman of any recognized Christian

denomination. It was too much, therefore, to expect from him that he

should exhibit any of the fine charities and warm affections which

distinguish the Christian character. He was a redskin, implacable in his

hate, not altogether trustworthy even in his friendships, and jealous of

his reputation and the traditions of his race. Nor was he without

manhood either. A brave, bloody, mocking and defiant manhood! capable of

the endurances of the martyr, exhibiting sometimes the sublimest

self-sacrifice and courage.

Whether out of these wild and savage materials there lay anywhere, at

any time, the human or divine power to mould a civilized community, does

not appear upon the record. It is certain, however, that after all the

far-too-late attempts to transfigure these savages into the likeness of

a down-East Yankee, or, better still, into the similitude of a Western

farmer, no permanent good results are likely to ensue.

The red man and the white are separated indeed by the prodigious

distances (ethnologically speaking) not only of race and language, but

of noble tradition and glorious history. They could never amalgamate in

blood, or in the so-called natural sympathies of man. They seem to be

born enemies! as their feelings and their instincts apparently reach

them when they come into contact with each other. They cannot exist side

by side. A mightier than they holds the destinies of both in His hands.

He has tried the redskins. He has given them a good chance upon the

earth, and they have failed to do anything but kill buffalo and breed

like rats--often burrowing like rats--refusing to dig and plant the

teeming, beneficent earth which had been committed to their charge; and

preferring, generally, the life of a vagabond loafer to that of a

thrifty, careful husbandman.

I do not blame them. They are as God made them, and man left them; for,

I suppose, their forebears--somewhere afar off in Asia, perhaps, in the

dim, immemorial ages--had all passed through the various phases of the

civilization of their time, and that they did not grow out of the tail

of any gorilla. It is not for profane man to inquire what possible

reason there could be for the perpetuation--let alone the creation--of

such a useless, bootless race. There they are, occupiers of the soil for

unknown centuries--before the white man ever saw their faces--many

thousands of them still squatting there, cleaving, like bereaved

Autochthons, to the bosom of the dear old mother who had whelped and so

long nurtured them; and trying to make themselves believe that they are

still masters of the continent.

What they were made for at all, I do not pretend to divine. The

Divine Maker of all knows best, and what He does is its own

justification--satisfying the wellnigh insatiable cry of the universe

for universal justice. They are the saurians of humanity; and it is

remarkable that the idea of 'progressive development'--if I may be

pardoned for making use of a term in modern philosophy about which there

has been so much assumption and canting--it is remarkable that this

idea, which the name of _saurian_ suggests, should run through all

nature, and be embodied in her finest forms and intelligences. There is

a considerable distance between the saurian and good Master Adam, the

gardener of Eden; but it seems to me, after all, that this brutal, foul,

obscene monster of the prime, was only Adam in the making. He came after

him, a long way, at all events; and if geology had been fashionable in

his time, and he a _savant_, he might have chalked out for himself a

very fine pedigree.

For this strange, eccentric Nature, who meant _man_ from the beginning,

and failed to realize her ideal because of those horrible nightmare

dreams of which these saurians, mastodons, mammoths were the visible

representatives, did, nevertheless, make, in every succeeding world (for

every crust of this planet is the crust of a dead world), higher and

higher organizations--until, at last, she gave to man his _inscrutable_

birth!

That was, no doubt, a great triumph of power and genius! Man is a noble

animal, the finest of all living fellows! _et cetera! et cetera!_ But

what sort of a fellow was he when he came, in his spindles and

shacklebones, from the womb of the All-mother? Was he a Caucasian, or a

Mongolian, a Negro, a Malay, or a Bosjesman?--this last being an effigy

of man so abominable that no race that I have heard of will include him

even as a lodger in the parish settlements!

Mark! what a sameness, and yet what an infinite variety, there is in all

the operations and purposes of Nature! She does not grow us _men_ out of

our mothers, but babes--helpless, pitiably, tearfully helpless

_babes_!--ignorant; who must _grow_ into the perfect stature and the

mature mind of men. Is not this babe also a saurian in its little way?

Does a wider gap separate the saurian from the man, than that which

separates the tiny babe from some Bacon or Raleigh? The law of nature is

progress. It is often, nay, always, a very slow thing--but how sure! how

inevitable! how beneficent in its results! She never makes worse after

bad--and those weird opium monsters of the foreworlds were unspeakably

bad!--but always she makes of bad better; and of better she has made her

best, at present. In the light of this law, _were any one mad enough to

grope_, he might come to the conclusion that the first man (or race of

men) was anything but a grandee in mind, person, or estate; and that our

seemingly puzzled but at last most wonder-working mother, ycleped

Nature, made some very ugly attempts at man before she reached the

climax of her imagination and her power as it obtains in the man

Caucasian!

I regard all the colored races--and with no malice or evil of any sort

in my heart toward them--as first experiments in the gamut of human

creation. Neither ethnology nor any other ology will pull out of my

consciousness--let alone my active intellect--the belief that these were

the oldest, the primordial races, or the descendants of such, and that

the white Caucasian man, with his noble brain and heart, his matchless

person, was an afterthought, the brightest since her birth-thought of

the earth's creation. Look into the face of any upgrown modern Indian!

It is an _old_ face, as if the accumulated wrinkles of, not 'forty,' but

a hundred 'centuries' had ploughed their marks there. They seem to

belong to the dawn of time; while our Caucasian man is ever young and

beautiful, the born master of all things.

We must deal with races according to their faculty, and credit them

according to their faculty. If we fail, we fail in wisdom--and in

prudence, which is a valuable attribute of wisdom. Expect not grapes

from thistles! Expect no virtue--unless it relates to his own

selfishness or his own tribe--from an Indian, or from very many other

men!

It must not be forgotten, however, that Indians are people who, to say

the least of them, are fashioned in the likeness of men. Here, as

elsewhere, Nature sticks to her old plan, and will not budge an inch. In

the chart of the Indian's nature are mapped out the same feelings,

instincts, passions, the same organs and dimensions as belong to the

highest race, or the highest race of the mixed races. She will have no

nonsense about her red children, nor about her black. There they are, as

she (for purposes of her own, not particularly clear) intended them to

be--men, alive, oh!--not descendants of Monboddo's ape, nor of Du

Chaillu's gorilla, but men proper and absolute! with their duties,

responsibilities, and destinies.

Seeing, therefore, that the Indian (our American Indian, with whom we

have now to do) has all the faculties--however defaced and blurred by

long centuries of bloody crimes, which they regard _not_ as crimes, but

as virtues--seeing that these red, thriftless, bloody-minded Indians

have all the human faculties intact--although, it may be, not so bright

as those of some of our own people who call themselves Americans--is it

not possible that by fair and manly dealing with them, by a just trade,

and conscientious regard for the sanctity of treaty rights and

obligations--that you, whom it may more particularly concern, might so

win their good will as to make them friends instead of enemies? The

devil that lies at the bottom of all savage natures is easily roused,

not at all so easily laid again, and as easily kept in his own place.

Indians are not incapable of friendship, nor of good faith, although the

best require a great deal of looking after--and close looking, too! But

what I want to urge is this: that if you always appeal to the worst

passions of the redskin, rob him of his rights and property, cheat him

by false promises, deceive him at all hands, and then mock him when he

knocks at your door for credit or charity, that he and his may live, you

cannot much wonder if, obeying his traditions, his religion, and the

dictates of his savage nature--now maddened into fury and reckless of

consequences--he indulges in the frightful havoc, the relentless murders

and burnings, which have so lately marked his trail in Minnesota.

Let no one suppose for a moment, from what I have now said, that I

design to offer any apology, any excuse for the nameless and

unpunishable crimes which these miscreants have perpetrated. I have no

pity and no compassion for them, and surely no word either which I

desire should be construed, in this respect, to their favor. I go with

the old Scotch judge--a rigid Antinomian! who, having tried and

convicted a Calvinist as rigid as himself, asked him what he had to say

why the sentence of the law should not be pronounced against him.

'My lord,' said the prisoner, 'it's a bad job; but I was predestined to

do it!'

Whereupon his lordship replied: 'Ay! ay! my cannie laddie! an' I was

predestined to hang ye for't.'

So while I set forth the necessary, evil nature of the Indian, and the

consequent necessity of his bloody deeds, I also insist upon the

necessity of hanging him for it.

I plead not for the Indian of Minnesota, after these most shocking, most

appalling butcheries. I love my own race; and not a man, woman, or

child, who was sacrificed by these monsters, but their wounds were my

wounds, and their agonies tore my heart to the very core. Henceforth I

shall never see an Indian but I shall feel the 'goose flesh' of loathing

and horror steal over my Adam's buff! But you, my beloved friends of

Minnesota! you who have suffered so much in your families and homes

during the massacre, are you sure that you did all you could do as

citizens and rulers in this land to see even-handed justice dealt out

between the corrupt Government agencies and storekeepers, and the

helpless Indians? Had these last no just and reasonable ground of

complaint? complaint of the General Government, complaint of the delays

in their payment, complaint of the swindling of the storekeepers and

traders?

They had sold their lands, and gone away to their reservations. But the

money for their lands--promised so faithfully at such a time--where was

that money? _Non est!_ The Indians depended on it, trusted to the

certainty of its coming as the saint trusts in the promises. They came

for it--often, in their history, in the depth of winter, for hundred of

miles, through an inhospitable forest; their wives, children, and braves

starving--many of them left behind in the wilderness to die; their only

weapon made of coarse nails, lashed with wire, and this they called a

gun barrel, and with this they killed what game was killed by the way.

This did not happen in Minnesota, it is true; but events as horrible and

sickening as this did happen, and brought with them consequences more

horrible still, which will never be forgotten while the State exists or

the language lasts. Scenes were enacted at that 'Lower Agency' which

were disgraceful to human nature, and the victims were invariably the

redskins. Once when Red Iron came there, at the summons, or rather after

the repeated summons of Governor Ramsay, it turned out that nearly four

hundred thousand dollars of the cash payment due to the Sioux, under the

treaties of 1851-'2, were paid to the traders on old indebtedness! How

much of this enormous sum was really due to the traders it is bootless

now to inquire; although it is pretty certain, from what we know of

similar transactions, that not a twentieth part of it was due to them.

Mr. Isaac V. D. Heard, who has written a 'History of the Sioux War and

Massacres of 1862 and 1863,' who is an old resident of Minnesota of

twelve years' standing, acted with General Sibley in his expedition

against the savages in 1862, and was recorder of the military commission

which tried some four hundred of the participants in the outbreak--has

not been deterred by the just hatred which the Minnesota people nurture

against the Indians, and which they will keep hot until their rifles

have exterminated the whole brood of them, from saying a brave word

respecting the iniquities perpetrated by rascal peddlers and official

prigs against the Indians which were the immediate causes of the

massacre and the subsequent wars.

The Indian was subjected to all sorts of frauds, little and big--the

smaller thieves thinking that they also must live, no matter at whose

expense, although I demur to the proposition. Why should they stop at

stealing a thousand or two, more or less, while that four hundred

thousand swindle leered at them so wickedly over the left shoulder,

mocking at all law and justice, and scot free from all punishment? These

'traders' could charge what sums they liked against the Indian, and get

them too; for there was no one to defeat or check their rapacity. Mr.

Heard tells us that no less a sum than fifty-five thousand dollars was

claimed by one Hugh Tyler, as due to him by the Indians, when the great

swindle just alluded to was committed; and that he was paid out of the

accruing funds. This man was a stranger in the country, an adventurer,

who went out into the wilderness 'for to seek his fortune;' and it is

curious to read the items of which his little bill, fifty-five thousand,

is composed. Here they are: For getting the treaties through the Senate;

for '_necessary disbursements_' in securing the assent of the chiefs.

Very curious and instructive items they are, to all who consider them.

To say nothing of the corruption of the Senate which the first item

signifies, if it has any meaning at all, there is the guilty record of

the 'necessary disbursements,' or, in other words, _bribes_, paid to

chiefs for betraying their country and their race. This was a part of

the regular machinery of the Agencies. All their plans were cut and

dried, and they had men to carry them out. They could not stir a peg

without the assent of the chiefs; and when they found a man too noble to

be a traitor, they got the Governor to break him as a chief, and invest

a more pliable, accommodating redskin with his rank and title. Through

the influence of bad men, and by the forging of lying documents, which

the Indians could not read, and which were never interpreted to them

except to cheat them as to their contents and meaning, they have always

managed to get their treaties signed; after which the newly made chiefs

could not so much as take the liberty to beg a pipe of tobacco of them.

As a sample of their infamous dealings, we take the following excerpt

from Mr. Heard's book, page 41:

'In 1857, a trader, pretending that he was getting them to sign a

power of attorney to get back the money which had gone to the

traders under the treaty of 1851 and 1852, obtained their

signatures to vouchers, by which he swindled them out of $12,000.

Shortly after, this trader secured the payment of $4,500 for goods

which he claimed (falsely, it is said) to have been stolen. About

the same time a man in Sioux City was allowed a claim of $5,000 for

horses, which he also alleged to have been stolen.

'In 1858, the chiefs were taken to Washington, and agreed to

treaties for the cession of all their reservations north of the

Minnesota, for which, as ratified by the Senate, they were to have

$166,000; but of this amount they never received a penny until four

years afterward, when $15,000, in goods, were sent to the Lower

Sioux, and these were deducted out of what was due them under

former treaties. The Indians, discovering the fraud, refused to

receive them for several weeks, and only consented to take them

after the Government had agreed to rectify the matter. _Most of the

large amount due under these treaties, went into the pockets of

traders, Government officials, and swindlers generally._

'The Indians were grievously disappointed with their bargains, and

from that time the control of affairs passed from the chiefs--who,

it was believed, had been bribed--to the young men. They had now

nearly disposed of all their lands, and received scarcely anything

for them. They were six thousand two hundred in number, and their

annuities, when paid in full, were hardly fifteen dollars apiece.

'Their sufferings,' continues Mr. Heard, 'were often severe,

especially during the winter and spring previous to the massacres.'

Their crops failed them; a heavy fall of snow, late in the season, came

to increase their miseries, and delayed the spring hunts. The Sissetons,

of Lac Traverse, had to eat their horses and dogs--and at least fifteen

hundred of the old men, women, and children had to be supported by the

Government at an extra expense; and this was so inadequately done that

some died of starvation.

The history of these iniquities is no new thing in Indian affairs. It

is, from first to last, a record of the most shameless lying and fraud.

The Agency seems to have been established there as a sort of Jonathan

Wild's shop, for the purpose of carrying on the trade of thieving. What

did these storekeepers--who credited the Indians for tobacco and rum,

for bread and beef, for clothing, and such other luxuries as they had

come to regard as necessaries--care for the winter prospects of the

wretched Indians, after they had lined their pockets with that four

hundred thousand dollars? Not a dime! And when subsequently it was found

that only half the regular Government payment would be handed over to

the Indians during the next year, these storekeepers--on the 'Wild'

plan--not only refused to give them credit for articles indispensable to

life in the wilderness, but insulted them to boot; and this so

exasperated the proud, revengeful nature of the Indian, that he

remembered it afterward in many a bloody murder which he committed, and

the innocent suffered for the guilty!

Mr. Heard acquits the Agency, and all connected with it, of being in

any way the causes of this outbreak. But his own statements of their

dealing with the Indians hardly bear him out in his judgment. I do not

mean to say that the people of the Lower Agency were a whit worse in

such dealings than those of the Upper, or any other similar Agency. It

is an understood thing, and mercilessly practised, that the Indian shall

be fleeced whenever the white man has a chance to fleece him. It is the

law and the gospel of these Agencies; and we must not allow ourselves to

be hoodwinked in this matter by the mistaken humanity of Mr. Heard.

And yet, if we think of it, there could not have been devised a more

evil scheme, either against the natives or the settlers, than these

wellnigh irresponsible Agencies. From all parts of the Union, from every

country of the Old World, emigrants had come to settle in the beautiful

Minnesota State; they had built themselves good, substantial houses,

ploughed, fenced, and planted their rich and prosperous farms, conquered

the savage wilderness into blooming cornfields, orchards, and

gardens--and here was their true El Dorado! where they hoped to live in

peace, plenty, and security. They were not afraid of the savages, but

their wont was to make friends of them, and to be their friends,

entertaining them at their homes when they visited the settlements, and

doing all they could--with some exceptions--to perpetuate among them a

good feeling and an intelligent understanding.

To a certain extent, and in some cases, they succeeded in this

straight-forward diplomacy. But the predisposition of the reds to

enmity with the whites was still there, slumbering only, not eradicated;

nor could all the kindness and generosity of the whole Caucasian heart,

heaped upon them in the most lavish profusion, ever root it out. Nature

put it there--I wish she hadn't--for reasons of her own, just as she put

murder into the cruel heart and brain of the tiger in the jungle.

There was this 'original sin,' therefore, to contend against always,

without reference to any tangible causes or provocations. All knew this.

All knew, from the youngest to the oldest, that the true policy of the

whites was to conciliate the Indians. They knew his inextinguishable

memory of wrongs, his dreadful vengeance, his power, and his constant

opportunity to do irreparable mischief. And, as I said, the settlers

were, for the most part, anxious to smoke the pipe of peace and

friendship with him.

But what was the good of all this? What, think you, did it avail in the

councils of the savages, when they sat over their fires discussing their

wrongs and prospects? What the good-hearted settlers did in the way of

reconciliation and good will was undone a thousandfold at the Agency. It

is true that the Agency had become necessary to the subsistence of the

Indian, and that this fact made him bear much which, under other

circumstances, he would instantly have resented and punished. But they

well knew how they were robbed; and when did a wrong of that, or any

sort, pass muster upon the Indian's roll of vengeance? Every fraud

against an Indian, every lie told him, every broken promise, every

worthless article sold to him at the Agency, was more than a set-off to

any act of kindness shown to him by the settlers. Add to these local

crimes, the great error of the Government in unduly withholding the

Indian payment for their lands--and you have the Indian's _casus belli_,

the grounds, or some of them, on which he justified himself to his own

bloody and remorseless conscience, for his inhuman deeds! For the Indian

beeps a conscience, such as it is; but of a truth, better no conscience

than an Indian's conscience! It is like an appeal to hell, one's appeal

to this! all the accursed passions imprisoned there coming up from their

limbos, their eyes glaring with the malice of ineradicable hate, and

bloodshot with murder, to support the conscience, and strengthen its

resolution for an unspeakable vengeance.

But, after all, this poor devil is really to be pitied for his ignorance

and brutality, and as really to be killed without mercy. He is in the

way of civilization, and must go to the wall. I find that Nature herself

is utterly pitiless; that she cares neither for white nor red, nor for

any other color or person, but, like a horrible, crashing car of

Juggernaut, she rolls steadily forward, astride the inevitable

machinery, crushing all who oppose her.

But this digression is no apology, in the matter of its argument, for

the Indian Agents, who must have been aware, long before the outbreak

took place, that their frauds were fast culminating in the Indian mind,

and that every fresh wrong they did to them was only bringing nearer by

a step the indiscriminate massacre of the settlers.

There were other causes, however, besides these, to enrage and madden

them, which must not be lost sight of. Our Government had prohibited

their sanguinary wars upon the Chippewas, and they regarded this as an

act of wanton tyranny. They were bred in the faith that war is the true

condition of an Indian man, and that peace was made for women and

children. War was the only outlet for their power, the only field in

which they could distinguish themselves and win immortal renown. All the

great kingdoms of knowledge and literature were shut against them as

with walls of brass. They could not read or write, and their leisure was

passed in idle gossip, or in deliberations on infernal schemes against

the white man to revenge themselves for their wrongs.

It was not a wise thing to do, I think; although, no doubt, it was

humane enough, as we understand humanity. Did not the 'dragons of the

prime tear other in their slime,' and so thin out the horrible race,

until Nature herself put the final claws of annihilation upon them? Why,

in mercy, then, do we try to prevent the inevitable? War is a great

clearer of the atmosphere; and one of our poets, Coleridge, I believe,

says that 'Carnage is God's daughter'! a bold figure of rhetoric, not

without its apparently sufficient apologies. Why not let the Sioux and

Chippewas, or any other of the wild, irreclaimable brood, fight their

bloodiest, and do their prettiest to help Nature, who seems bent on the

extermination of all inferior races? They have got to die, any

way!--that is a great consolation!--and if the philanthropists at

Washington had only left them to themselves, they would have died by

mutual slaughter--great numbers of them--long ago, and saved said

philanthropists from the crime of killing them, which they are now

doing, by inches!--a far more cruel way of dying.

I was much pleased, when last summer they were upbraided for doing a

little war against the Chips, in spite of Washington, with the sarcastic

reply of a chief, who said: 'Our Great Father, we know, has always told

us it was wrong to make war; yet now he himself is making war, and

killing a great many. Will you explain this to us? We do not understand

it!' This was a hit, a palpable hit, let who will reconcile it.

Mr. Heard gives us the following brief statement of the manner in which

treaties are made with the Indians; and I earnestly call the attention

of the Government and all just citizens to its statements. He says:

'The traders, knowing for years before, that the whites will

purchase lands, sell the Indians goods on credit, expecting to

realize their pay from the consideration to be paid by the

Government. They thus become interested instruments to obtain the

consent of the Indians to the treaty. And by reason of their

familiarity with the language, and the associations of half-breed

relatives, are possessed of great facilities to accomplish their

object. The persons deputed by the Government to effect a treaty

are compelled to procure their cooperation, and this they do by

providing that their debts shall be paid. The traders obtain the

concurrence of the Indians by refusing to give them further credit,

and by representing to them that they will receive an immense

amount of money if they sell their lands, and thenceforth will live

at ease, with plenty to eat, and plenty to wear, and plenty of

powder and lead, and of whatever else they may request. After the

treaty is agreed to, the amount of ready money is absorbed by the

_exorbitant demands of the traders_, and _the expenses of the

removal of the Indians to their reservations_!

'After that the trader no longer looks to the Indian for his pay;

he gets it from their annuities. He, therefore, does not use the

same means to conciliate their good will that he did when he was

dependent upon their honesty. Claims for depredations upon white

settlers are also deducted out of their moneys before they leave

Washington, on _insufficient testimony_; and these are always, when

based on fact, _double the actual loss_; for the Indian Department

is notoriously corrupt, and the hand manipulating the machinery

_must be crossed with gold_! The 'expenses' of obtaining a claim

enter into the amount demanded and allowed. The demand is not only

generally unjust, but, instead of its being deducted from the

moneys of the wrong doer, _it is taken from the annuities of all_!

This course punishes the innocent and rewards the guilty, because

the property taken by the depredator is of more value than the

slight percentage he loses.

'Many of the stipulations as to establishing schools and furnishing

them with farming utensils, are never carried out. Building and

supply contracts are entered into without investigation at

outrageous prices, and goods belonging to the Indians are put into

the traders' stores, and _sold to their owners_, and the moneys

realized _shared by the trader and the Agent_!'

Bishop Whipple, of Minnesota, in his appeal for the red man, confirms

this statement beyond doubt or question:

'There is not a man in America,' he says,'who ever gave an hour's

calm reflection to this subject, who does not know that our Indian

system is an organized system of robbery, and has been for years a

disgrace to the nation. It has left savage men without Governmental

control; it has looked on unconcerned at every crime against the

laws of God and man; it has fostered savage life by wasting

thousands of dollars in the purchase of paint, beads, scalping

knives, and tomahawks; it has fostered a system of trade which

robbed the thrifty and virtuous to pay the debts of the indolent

and vicious; it has squandered the funds for civilization and

schools; it has connived at theft; it has winked at murder; and at

last, after dragging the savage down to a brutishness unknown to

his fathers, it has brought a harvest of blood to our door!'

The Bishop continues:

'It was under this Indian system that the fierce, warlike Sioux

were fitted and trained to be the actors in this bloody drama, _and

the same causes are to-day, slowly but surely, preparing the way

for a Chippewa war_. There is not, to-day, an old citizen of

Minnesota who will not shrug his shoulders as he speaks of the

dishonesty which accompanied the purchase of the lands of the

Sioux. It left in savage minds a deep sense of injustice. Then,

followed ten years of savage life, unchecked by law, uninfluenced

by good example. They were taught by white men that lying was no

disgrace, adultery no sin, and theft no crime. Their hunting

grounds were gone; the onward march of civilization crowded them on

every side. Their only possible hope of being saved from starvation

was the fidelity with which a great nation fulfilled its plighted

faith, which before God and man it had pledged to its heathen

wards. _The people here, on the border, and the rulers at

Washington, know how that faith has been broken._

'The constant irritations of such a system would, in time, have

secured an Indian massacre. It was hastened and precipitated by the

sale of nearly eight hundred thousand acres of land, for _which

they never received one farthing_; for it was all absorbed in

claims! Then came the story (and it was true) that half of their

annuity money had also been taken for claims. They waited two

months, mad, exasperated, hungry--the Agent utterly powerless to

undo the wrong committed at Washington--and they resolved on savage

vengeance. For every dollar of which they have been defrauded we

shall pay ten dollars in the cost of the war. It has been so for

fifty years; it will be so again. _God's retributive justice always

has compelled a people to reap exactly what they have permitted to

be sown!_'

These extracts from the Bishop's Plea confirm what I have stated in the

preceding paragraphs; and the last sentence--which I have marked in

italics--is well worth the while of every reader to ponder well.

Mr. Heard dates the commencement of the massacre to the breaking of a

stray nest of hen's eggs on the prairie, and what came of the

transaction; but the date lies farther back than that, so far as the

resolution to seize the first favorable opportunity for slaughtering the

whites is concerned--and belongs to the era of the great crimes of our

Government against them, as shown in the forcible seizure of their lands

without their receiving any payment, even 'a farthing' for them; the

hucksters, under the connivance of the Government agents, getting the

whole of it, and, in the instance alluded to a while ago, keeping back

from them, as payment for old debts, about three hundred boxes of the

money upon which they had depended to keep themselves alive during the

winter and the following year.

Such enormous crimes were sure to reap a bloody harvest. The Indian is

no fool, although he can't do addition and subtraction. He knows when he

is _about_ fairly dealt with, and he knows when he is mightily plucked.

In this case of the 'old debt payment' he knew that he was robbed

wholesale, and through the mouth of Red Iron he proclaimed the fact to

Governor Ramsey, in council assembled. Alluding to this robbery, he

said:

'We don't think we owe them so much. We want to pay all our debts. We

want our Great Father to send three good men here, to tell us how much

we do owe; and whatever they say, we will pay; and (pointing to the

Indians) that's what all these braves say; our chiefs and all our people

say this!'

At which all the Indians present responded:

'Ho! ho!'

This Red Iron was the principal chief of the Sissetons, and his

indignation at the wrongs done to his race made him so 'boisterous' that

Governor Ramsey was imprudent enough to break him of his chieftainship.

The scene and its results were by no means creditable to the Governor.

This latter personage had summoned Red Iron to meet him at a council,

held December, 1852, and he did not turn up as expected. So, I suppose,

he was sent for, and brought in by the soldiers. He is described by one

who was present, as about forty years old, tall and athletic; six feet

high in his moccasons, with a large, well-developed head, aquiline nose,

thin, compressed lips, and physiognomy beaming with intelligence and

resolution. He was clad in the half military, half Indian costume of the

Dacotah chiefs, as he sat in the council room; and no one greeted or

noticed him. A very poor piece of revenge! In a few minutes the

Governor, turning to the chief in the midst of a breathless silence, by

the aid of an interpreter, opened council. The Governor asked the chief

what excuse he had for not coming to the council when he sent for him.

Whereupon Red Iron rose to his feet, 'with native grace and dignity,'

says Mr. Heard, his blanket falling from his shoulders, and, purposely

dropping the pipe of peace, he stood erect before the Governor, with his

arms folded and his right hand pressed upon the sheath of his scalping

knife. With the utmost coolness and self-possession, a defiant smile

playing upon his thin lips, and his eyes sternly fixed upon his

excellency, the Indian, with a firm voice, replied:

'I started to come, but your braves drove me back.'

GOVERNOR. 'What excuse have you for not coming the second time

when I sent for you?'

The Continental Monthly, Vol. 6, No 2, August, 1864 Devoted to Literature and National Policy · 第 17 / 43 题