CHAP. XXVI.

A NAVAL STUDY—(continued).

THE EVIDENCE OF OFFICERS PRESENT IN BASQUE ROADS.—ADMIRAL AUSTEN’S

OPINIONS CONFIRMATORY OF MY STATEMENTS—FALLACY OF ALLEGED REWARDS TO

MYSELF, IN PLACE OF THESE PERSECUTIONS.—TREATMENT OF MY ELDEST SON

LORD COCHRANE.—LETTER FROM CAPT. HUTCHINSON COMFIRMATORY OF THE

ENEMY’S PANIC.—A MIDSHIPMAN NEAR TAKING THE FLAG-SHIP.—EVIDENCE OF

CAPT. SEYMOUR, CONCLUSIVE AS TO NEGLECT, WHICH WAS THE MATTER TO BE

INQUIRED INTO, IN NOT SENDING SHIPS TO ATTACK.—ATTEMPT TO WEATHER

HIS EVIDENCE.—CAPT. MALCOLM’S EVIDENCE CONFIRMATORY OF CAPT.

SEYMOUR’S.—CAPT. BROUGHTON’S TESTIMONY PROVES THE COMPLETE PANIC OF

THE ENEMY, AND THE WORTHLESSNESS OF THEIR FORTIFICATIONS.—LORD

GAMBIER DECLARES THEM EFFICIENT ON SUPPOSITION ARISING FROM

HEARSAY.—ENEMY UNABLE TO FIGHT THEIR GUNS.—THE IMAGINARY SHOAL.—A

GREAT POINT MADE OF IT.—MR. FAIRFAX’S MAP—LORD GAMBIER ON THE

EXPLOSION VESSELS.—CONTRADICTED BY MR. FAIRFAX.—CONTRAST OF THEIR

RESPECTIVE STATEMENTS.—FAIRFAX’S EVASIONS.—HIS LETTER TO THE “NAVAL

CHRONICLE.”—THESE MATTERS A WARNING TO THE SERVICE.

The matters related in the preceding chapter will appear yet more

extraordinary when contrasted with, and confirmed by, the evidence of

eminent officers present in the action of Aix Roads; that is, of such

officers commanding ships as were permitted to give their testimony, for

those who were suspected of not approving the Commander-in-chief’s

conduct, _were not summoned to give evidence before the court-martial_!

In one instance—that of Captain Maitland, of the _Bellerophon_, whose

opinions on the subject had been freely expressed—this gallant officer

was ordered to join the squadron in Ireland, so as to render his

testimony unavailable.

To a gallant officer still living, Admiral Sir Francis William Austen,

K.C.B., who was present in Basque Roads, but, like other eminent

officers, _not examined on the court-martial_, I am indebted for a

recently-expressed opinion as to the causes why the majority of the

enemy’s ships were suffered to escape beyond reach of attack, as well as

of the persecution which I afterwards underwent, in consequence of my

conscientious opposition to a vote of thanks to the Commander-in-chief.

The autobiography of a seaman (volume 2 of 2) · 第 23 / 106 题