Here has been with me a gentleman from Holland, who was charged, as he

said, with a verbal commission from divers cities, to inquire whether

it was true, that Amsterdam had, as they heard, made a treaty of

commerce with the United States, and to express in that case their

willingness to enter into a similar treaty. Do you know anything of

this? What is become, or likely to become of the plan of treaty,

formerly under consideration?

By a letter from Middlebourg, to which the enclosed is an answer, a

cargo seized and sent to America, as English property, is reclaimed

partly on the supposition, that free ships make free goods. They ought

to do so between England and Holland, because there is a treaty which

stipulates it; but there being yet no treaty between Holland and

America to that purpose, I apprehend that the goods being declared by

the Captain to be English, a neutral ship will not protect them, the

law of nations governing in this case as it did before the treaty

abovementioned. Tell me if you please your opinion.

With sincere esteem and affection, I am ever,

B. FRANKLIN.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

The Hague, May 21st, 1780.

Sir,

The express sent to Petersburg, with the answer of the States-General,

has not yet returned. In the meantime it is known here by a despatch

of the Resident of the Republic at Petersburg, that the news of the

Provincial Resolution of Holland, which always gives the tone to the

others, has caused there a very agreeable sensation, not only to the

Court of Russia, flattered to see the Republic enter into its views,

but also to the foreign Ministers resident there; and that the

Prussian Minister, above all, expressed himself very strongly on the

insolence of the English, and on the indignity of their procedure to

the Republic; in fine, that the system of the armed neutrality to

humiliate the English, gains force more and more at the Court, and

among the powers; which is very visible in the conversations among the

ministers.

I wrote some days ago to Amsterdam, to advise them to offer to the

State every fifth sailor of their merchant ships, in order to take

away the pretext for the scarcity of sailors in the fleet of the

Republic; and I recommended to them to prevent evil minded persons

presenting a counter address. They answered me, that the address

demands of the States the prompt protection of commerce, and offers

them whatever they may wish to draw from that commerce, whether it be

the every fifth or third seaman; and that though all have not signed

it, no one will dare to oppose it. This address will be presented next

week; and if I can have a copy of it soon enough, I will add hereto a

copy or translation.

We flatter ourselves soon to see Mr Laurens arrive here, as we have

been assured. It is time for the politics as well as for the credit of

America that some person, as distinguished as himself, should come

here. He cannot yet display a public character; but his presence will

do none the less good among the friends of America in this country. I

wish he was already with us.

I was going, Sir, to close this packet, when I received the visit of

M. Van de Perre, partner of M. Meyners, who form together the most

eminent commercial house at Middlebourg, in Zealand. He begs me to

support the claim that he has made through Messrs I. de Neufville &

Son, and by another way also to Congress on the ship Berkenbos, bound

from Liverpool to Leghorn, and loaded with herrings and lead for Dutch

and Italian account, taken by John Paul Jones, Captain of the

Continental frigate Alliance. M. Van de Perre is of the most

distinguished family in Zealand, Director of the East India Company,

nephew of M. Van Berckel, First Counsellor, Pensionary of Amsterdam,

the brave republican of whom all my letters make mention, and who is

the great friend of Americans. I have no need to say anything more to

recommend the affair of this vessel to Congress.

I have the honor to be, &c.

DUMAS.

* * * * *

JOHN ADAMS TO C. W. F. DUMAS.

Paris, June 6th, 1780.

Sir,

I thank you for your letter, in answer to mine of the 21st of May, and

for your kind congratulations on my arrival here.

Mr Brown, with whom you took your walks in the neighborhood of Paris,

has been gone from home some weeks, on his way hence. I should have

had much pleasure if I had been one of the party. I have rambled in

most of the scenes round this city, and find them very pleasant, but

much more indebted to art than to nature. Philadelphia, in the

purlieus of which, as well as those of Baltimore and Yorktown, I have

often sought health and pleasure in the same way, in company with our

venerable Secretary, Charles Thompson, will in future time, when the

arts shall have established their empire in the new world, become much

more striking. But Boston above all, around which I have much oftener

wandered, in company with another venerable character, little known in

Europe, but to whose virtues and public merits in the cause of

mankind, history will do justice, will one day present scenes of

grandeur and beauty, superior to any other place I have ever yet seen.

The letter of General Clinton, when I transmitted it to you, was not

suspected to be an imposition. There are some circumstances, which are

sufficient to raise a question, but I think none of them are

conclusive, and upon the whole I have little doubt of its

authenticity. I shall be much mortified if it proves a fiction, not on

account of the importance of the letter, but the stain that a practice

so disingenuous will bring upon America. When I first left America,

such a fiction, with all its ingenuity, would have ruined the

reputation of the author of it, if discovered, and I think that both

he and the printer would have been punished. With all the freedom of

our presses, I really think, that not only the government but the

populace would have resented it. I have had opportunities of an

extensive acquaintance with the Americans, and I must say, in justice

to my countrymen, that I know not a man that I think capable of a

forgery at once so able and so base. Truth is indeed respected in

America, and so gross an affront to her I hope will not, and I think

cannot go unpunished.

Whether it is genuine or not, I have no doubt of the truth of the

facts, in general, and I have reasons to believe, that if the secret

correspondence of Bernard, Hutchinson, Gage, Howe, and Clinton could

all be brought to light, the world would be equally surprised at the

whole thread of it. The British administration and their servants have

carried towards us from the beginning a system of duplicity, in the

conduct of American affairs, that will appear infamous to the public

whenever it shall be known.

You have seen Rodney's account of the battle of the 17th of April. The

sceptre of the ocean is not to be maintained by such actions as this,

and Byron's, and Keppel's. They must make themselves more terrible

upon the ocean, to preserve its dominion. Their empire is founded only

in fear--no nation loves it. We have no news.

I have the honor to be, &c.

JOHN ADAMS.

* * * * *

PROTEST OF THE CITY OF AMSTERDAM.

_Extracted from the Resolutions of the Council of that City of the

29th of June, 1780, and inserted in the Acts of the Provincial

Assembly of Holland, at the Hague, July 1st, 1780._

The Deputies of the city of Amsterdam, in the name and on the part of

their constituents, in order to justify themselves to posterity, have

declared in the Assembly of their Noble and Grand Mightinesses that

their Committee is of opinion that it is necessary, without loss of

time, to write on the part of their High Mightinesses to M. de Swart,

their Resident at the Court of Russia, and charge him to enter into a

conference, the sooner the better, with the Commissioners of her

Imperial Majesty of Russia, and of other neutral powers in the place

of his residence and elsewhere, where it shall be judged suitable, in

order to conclude together a convention for the mutual protection of

the commerce and navigation of neutral powers, on the basis of the

declaration made by her Majesty to the belligerent powers, and of the

resolution adopted on this subject by their High Mightinesses, on the

24th of April last, adding to it only, that said M. de Swart shall

take for the rule of his conduct the simplicity which her Imperial

Majesty of Russia herself has proposed in the explanations which she

made on five points at the request of his Swedish Majesty, and which

M. de Swart has communicated to their High Mightinesses, to the end,

that with such a provisional convention, they would be well pleased to

decree together the reciprocal protection of the merchant ships of

each other, which, fortified with the requisite papers shall be

nevertheless insulted on the sea; so that these merchant vessels being

in reach of one or more vessels of war of one of the allied powers,

wherever it may be, they may receive, in virtue of such an alliance,

any assistance; and that at the same time the contracting powers

engage to put to sea, provisionally, all the vessels of war they can,

and to give to the officers who shall command them necessary orders

and instructions that they may be able to fulfil these general,

salutary and simple views.

And that, further, as to arrangements to be made for the future, which

may require more particular detail, and which cannot be adjusted with

the expedition which the present perilous state of the navigation of

the neutral powers in general, and of this Province in particular

demands, M. de Swart will reserve all this for a separate article, of

which her Imperial Majesty of Russia made mention in the above named

explanations, and that he will declare in regard to this that their

High Mightinesses have given thereon their final and precise orders,

in which they will constitute one or more Plenipotentiaries who will

be able to treat of the necessary arrangements on this subject with

the neutral powers.

That said constituents, to give greater weight to their present

advice, add further to the above, that if this advice was rejected,

and if the affair was negotiated on the basis of the previous opinion,

exhibited on the 23d of June last, in the Assembly of Holland, the

consequence of it will be that the Russian squadron, which, according

to orders of her Imperial Majesty of Russia, must have already put to

sea, will appear in the seas bordering on this country, without giving

any protection to the commerce of this country; while, on the other

side, though commerce has been a long time charged with double duties,

their High Mightinesses, meantime, grant it no protection, because the

Colleges of Admiralty of this country profess themselves unable to do

it, or at least to put to sea sufficient convoys to avoid affronts

like those which the squadron under the orders of Rear-Admiral de

Byland had lately endured.

That from this total failure of protection to the navigation of this

country, on the one side, and from the continual insults of which

their High Mightinesses every day receive grievous complaints on the

other, there must naturally ensue an entire suspension of the commerce

of this country; and thence, it is easy to foresee, that this commerce

will be diverted and take its course by other European channels, and

that the burdensome impositions with which it is charged, in order to

obtain means for its protection being continued, will precipitate its

ruin.

That in this confusion of affairs, and in the extreme necessity in

which they find themselves, to take advantage of an offer of

assistance and succor so generously and magnanimously made and

proposed by her Imperial Majesty of Russia to this State, on a footing

so easy and so little burdensome; the Lords Constituents will leave

posterity to judge of the weight of the reasons alleged by some

members of the Assembly of their Noble and Grand Mightinesses in the

deliberation on this subject, as if the acceptance of said means for

the necessary protection of the commerce of this country, and in

particular of foreign succor, could be considered a means of drawing

on a war on the part of those, against whom it is found necessary to

defend ourselves, in making use of said means to all lawful purposes;

and as if we ought, for this reason, to decline the said offer of

assistance, unless her Imperial Majesty of Russia, beside her said

magnanimous plan of re-establishing the liberty of the seas, will also

engage with the other neutral powers to guaranty to this nation all

its possessions fixed and immovable, both in and out of Europe.

That the Lords Constituents will only remark, that in order that such

an attack on the fixed and immovable possessions of the Republic may

appear likely, it would be necessary at least, to allege some

plausible reasons or pretexts to defend it, in the eyes of all Europe,

from the most manifest injustice and violence; whereas it is clear

that such hostilities could not have any foundation on a protection of

commerce to which their High Mightinesses find themselves absolutely

forced by the open violation of the treaty of commerce concluded with

England in 1674; that thus the probability of an attack of this sort,

seeing the manifest injustice of such an enterprize, must vanish; and

this especially, if we consider the great number of enemies that

England has drawn upon her, and that it would be madness to increase

the number; that such being the case, the said suppositions are of too

small weight and too far removed from all probability to refuse the

means which are offered of protecting the commerce of the subjects of

the State, and that to refuse an aid so powerful while it is not in a

condition to protect its commerce by its own unaided forces, will be

evidently to renounce all protection possible, while the burdensome

imposts under which commerce, in expectation of some protection, has a

long time groaned, and still groans, would, against all reason, remain

in their rigor.

That in addition to this the Lords Constituents will remark further,

that it appears by the successive despatches of M. de Swart to their

High Mightinesses on this affair, that he insists strongly on

hastening the business, and on sending, the sooner the better,

necessary instructions for this purpose, after the example of Sweden,

who has already instructed her Minister to conclude the said

convention. That this is the more necessary because we know that all

sorts of indirect means are set to work to deprive the Republic of the

advantage of an alliance so beneficial, and to involve it in a war

with France.

From this it is clear that such pernicious views will be accomplished,

if not only they put off the completion of the convention, but also,

as is but too apparent, if they evade it altogether by making her

Imperial Majesty of Russia propositions of guaranty, which not only

are entirely foreign to the plan which this Princess has laid before

the eyes of Europe, but which her Majesty, in the explanations she has

given, has roundly declared she would never listen to.

In fine that the Lords Constituents are of opinion, that it is

necessary to satisfy the wishes of her Imperial Majesty of Russia, by

making the declaration in question on the part of their High

Mightinesses to the belligerent powers, and by assuring her Majesty

that as soon as said convention shall be signed, their High

Mightinesses will make the said declaration to the Courts of the

belligerent powers.

Meantime the committee referred thereon to the better advice of the

honorable Council. On which, having deliberated and the voices having

been taken, the Burgomasters and Counsellors thanked the committee for

the trouble they had taken and agreed to the above advice.

A. VAN HINGELANDT.

* * * * *

JAMES LOVELL TO C. W. F. DUMAS.

Philadelphia, July 10th, 1780.

Sir,

I know not how I can profess all the regard which I feel for you,

without appearing, on the one hand, to do it upon slight grounds, or,

on the other, to have delayed it too long.

I have been steadily in Congress without once visiting my family in

Boston, since January, 1777, and from May, that year, have been a

member of the Committee of Foreign Affairs; consequently, I am well

informed of your truly republican spirit, your particular affection

for these States, and your industry in their service, most of your

numerous letters, down to December 30th, 1779, having come to hand.

The honorable gentleman who will deliver this, being also a member of

Congress, has a just esteem for you, and promises himself much

advantage from an opportunity of conversing with you. Mr Searle is

well able to make a due return of the benefits from the fund of his

intimacy with American state affairs, his extensive commercial

knowledge, and his science of mankind gained by former travels.

I shall shortly write to you again by another respectable gentleman of

our assembly, and I will use every means to make him the bearer of

what you have so rightfully solicited, as a faithful _first_

correspondent of our Committee, from whom you will, probably, have

regular official letters under a new arrangement of a secretaryship,

which has been vacant from the days of a confusion excited by an

indiscreet and illiberal publication here, on the 5th of December,

1778, and which you have read with grief.

In the meantime, I hope you will receive kindly this individual

testimony of cordial friendship, from, Sir, your very humble servant,

JAMES LOVELL.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

The Hague, July 15th, 1780.

Sir,

Since my last of the 21st of May, nothing has passed of much interest

in the Assemblies of this Province, to deserve repetition. I send an

account of all that passes to Dr Franklin at Paris, almost every post.

The fitting out of ships of the Republic for convoy goes on slowly,

and the resolutions in this respect, and for the negotiations with

Russia, drag equally slow. The English party, led by the English

Ambassador, and by another person who leads the majority here,

continue to perplex, delay, and cross everything; and he who is at the

head of all, follows their impulses. In a word, the English intrigue

more here than in all Europe besides. The difficulties they excite in

Germany and foment on the subject of the coadjutor of Munster and

Cologne, are intended to embarrass this Republic, and hinder it from

being successfully occupied in the re-establishment of its navy. It

was in agitation to make choice of a Prince of Austria for coadjutor,

and, of consequence, for future Elector of Cologne. The King of

Prussia is opposed to it; and France also. England, in the name of

Hanover, favored the views of the House of Austria. This may kindle a

war in Germany.

The protest here annexed of the minority in the Chapter of Munster,

is a paper as important as it is well done. I received it in German

and translated it, and while I am writing this, a copy of it is

making.

I have nothing more to add, except that a body of ten thousand

Prussians, quartered in Westphalia, have orders to hold themselves

ready to march to Munster on the first signal.

The misfortune of Charleston has animated the courage of the

Anglomanes here, and filled our friends with consternation. I do my

best to encourage them, and I succeed. In spite of the intrigues of

the English, they will gain nothing important here, because there must

be unanimity in the resolutions for war or peace.

I have the honor to be, &c.

DUMAS.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

The Hague, July 22d, 1780.

Sir,

As everything is here in the inactivity of summer, nothing new has

occurred. The States of the Province of Holland do not assemble till

the 26th of this month. It is to be wished that we may soon receive

news from America, which will raise again the courage of the friends

of the United States, to whom the misfortune of Charleston has caused

much pain, in proportion as it has reanimated those who favor your

enemies. The latter, in the meantime, forge and utter every day rumors

injurious to the United States, such as, that they are about to

submit. "The Congress," say they, "is disunited and ready to dissolve;

the southern Provinces successively yield, and they flatter themselves

in England, that those in the north will follow their example." The

King himself flatters his Parliament with this idea. I can, for the

present, only oppose patience to all this, and keep myself mostly out

of sight; for they look on me as a lost man, and one who will be soon

abandoned by America herself. Besides, my feeble health, which has not

been able to resist this shock and a concurrence of many others,

forces me to this inaction for a time.

Two Plenipotentiaries depart hence to regulate at Petersburg with the

Empress of Russia, the armed neutrality. The Court of Denmark has

followed the example of Russia, in making the same declarations to the

other powers. It appears that the affair of Munster will not trouble

the peace of Germany. This election must be made the 16th of next

month, and, probably, the Archduke will be coadjutor.

_July 24th._ The sudden declaration of Denmark, unforeseen by all the

world, much embarrasses those here who hope to see the armed

neutrality fail. Amsterdam has protested against sending

Plenipotentiaries to Petersburg, to whom embarrassing instructions

have been given. She wishes, with reason, that they would be content

simply to send full powers to M. de Swart, Resident of the Republic at

Petersburg, with orders to conform to the resolution of their High

Mightinesses, which is positive and clear on the accession to said

armed neutrality. It is expected that Sweden will make, on the first

opportunity, a like declaration. Then the opposition will not be able

to force the Republic to recede, without making themselves odious.

We hope by the next post, among other things, to receive good news

from the combined fleet of the Count de Guichen and Don Solano; as

also from M. de Ternay, and from the continent.

I have the honor to be, &c.

DUMAS.

* * * * *

WILLIAM CARMICHAEL TO C. W. F. DUMAS.

Madrid, July 24th, 1780.

Dear Sir,

I confess myself very remiss in not answering your favor of the 21st

ultimo sooner. The removal of the Court from Aranjues to this city,

and a bilious disorder which has oppressed me more than a month, and

which still afflicts me, have in part, been the reason. I have no news

to communicate to you, which can console you for our late misfortunes;

I can assure you, however, that they do not deject me. _Per aspera ad

astra._ Heaven does not intend to exempt us from the adversities,

which have befallen other nations, who struggled for their liberty, by

giving as almost full and instantaneous enjoyment of it. I have full

confidence in the perseverance of our countrymen. They will, I hope,

act with more vigor in consequence of their misfortunes. I have

received letters from America, dated in the end of April, and the 1st

of May, which speak of the loss of Charleston as certain, and which

predict other successes of the enemy in the Northern States, but which

show no despondency.

I shall pay implicit obedience to the request you make me, with

respect to your family, and you may rely upon me, when I tell you that

as long as I have any influence, or any friends in the councils of

America, they shall not want strenuous advocates, and this letter

will always be a memento that would put me to the blush, should I be

deficient in a promise, which I think myself even in justice to my

country obliged to endeavor to fulfil in the best manner possible. The

Spanish, or rather allied fleet, has returned to Cadiz, except a few

vessels which cruise near that port. The Count de Estaing is expected

at St Ildefonso in about a week, the Count being now at that place. I

go there this week.

I see that the _Courier de l'Europe_ mentions that Mr Jay has received

his _conge_, &c. &c. Not a word of truth. The English papers sent our

commissioners from France frequently, yet a treaty was made by these

same _conged_ commissioners. I have received your cypher safe. Begin

when you please your observations on men and things. I shall be much

obliged to you, to separate and seal up all the letters you have ever

received from me, unless it be this, under a cover for me, which, in

case of death, which heaven forbid, you will direct to me, delivered

to my orders.

My best compliments to your family, and Messrs de Neufville, and

believe me ever, your friend and servant,

WILLIAM CARMICHAEL.

* * * * *

TO THE PRESIDENT OF CONGRESS.

The Hague, July 25th, 1780.

Sir,

The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution, Vol. 09 · 第 29 / 36 段