CHAPTER II

THE DEMAND FOR MERCHANT SHIPPING

In our own age so many amazing developments have taken place during the

nineteenth and twentieth centuries that we must not be misled. These

are the exceptions and not the rule in history. Between the merchant

ships of the late Roman Empire and of the next few centuries there is

no evidence to cause us to think the ships materially altered. On the

contrary, what little evidence we have goes to show that the cargo

ship, with her mast, yard and square-sail, continued to be much the

same in the thirteenth century as she was in the third, if we add a

mizzen-mast and a lateen sail.

But all this time the Mediterranean trade had been developing, and

collaterally there was developed a Mercantile Marine. As the years

sped by, there came greater demands for the merchant ship. Thus in the

epistles of Cassiodorus, who was prætorian prefect under Theodoric

(A.D. 495-526), there is a dispatch to the tribunes of the “maritimi,”

or men of the seaboard, bidding them provide for the transport of

wine from Istria to Ravenna; and there is a reference to the frequent

voyages over the “immense spaces of the sea.”[1] By the eighth century

Venice was becoming a great trading port, and its merchants were

realising what the sea meant to them in regard to wealth. Indeed, they

even went so far as to sell Christian men as slaves to the Saracens in

Africa, thus incurring the Pope’s censure.

To Constantinople Venetian merchant ships sailed with goods or

passengers, as, for instance, in the year 968, carrying Bishop

Luitprand thither. In fact, by the year 1000 the city of Venice was

pre-eminent in commerce, and its princes were merchants. Overseas

trading was at last recognised as a means to wealth, and so,

inevitably, by about 1171 the Venetian Navy becomes organised. That

was bound to come as soon as the Mercantile Marine became important;

but it was arranged rather on the lines of our Naval Reserve. For all

ordinary occasions it consisted of volunteers, for whose service there

was payment, and these citizens were also entitled to prize money.

Indeed, throughout nautical history the navies of the world have always

been based on the Merchant Service. In these early days of Venice,

while Dalmatia, Istria and other communities supplied the men, Venice

provided the ships and rigging, the rest of the inventory and the

crew being forthcoming from the dependencies. Finally, in the time of

emergency hired seamen were obtained from foreign countries with whom

the Venetian commercial ships had traded.

He who visits Venice, or is familiar with Ruskin’s _Stones of Venice_,

or at least has admired in some gallery the paintings of the great

Venetian masters, must inevitably think of the sea. Those richly

designed palaces, those luxuriant examples of architecture and art,

were expressive of a city grown wealthy by reason of her sea trade.

Her merchants amassed wealth because their ships enabled them to

trade—the sea is, in fact, the greatest road to riches. And the history

of Phœnicia, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Venice, Portugal, Spain, Holland,

England in the past, and quite recently Germany, Japan and the United

States, is the story of overseas trade by means of merchant shipping.

Most important of all have always been the sea routes to the Orient,

for Eastern produce has ever fetched high prices in European countries.

As we look through the centuries of sea trade it was the fascination

of the East which spurred men to build, fit out and sail ships. It was

this which gave the incentive to make navigation a science; it was this

which created the spirit to explore unknown seas; it was this which

sent Columbus, later on, to the West in the hope of finding the East

Indies. The whole story of the East India Company—indeed of our Indian

Empire—is built up on the invaluable products which could be fetched

thence by peaceable shipping.

It was in the seventh century that the twelve townships decided to

elect one supreme magistrate, called the “doge.” Venice thus insisted

on her own independence, and her geographical position enabled her to

rise into a consummate commercial state. Not merely did she eventually

dominate the Adriatic, but step by step she absorbed all the carrying

trade of the world. Keen, enterprising men of vision and foresight,

these Venetian merchants went far afield, in spite of the difficulties

and dangers of travel. For centuries the Chinese had been sending

merchant ships as far west as Ceylon, whence Indian ships carried the

silk and other goods a stage further west to the Persian Gulf; and

afterwards, as there was no Suez Canal, a land journey intervened until

the Mediterranean was reached. Thus, by the early years of the Middle

Ages, the Venetian ships of commerce brought across the Mediterranean

and up the Adriatic the costly skins, the peacocks’ tails, the purple

garments and other enviable articles which had come from India, the

Caspian shores and elsewhere. In the end, Venice captured the great

trade to India and China, and Constantinople was left behind in the

competition.

But that was not all. Already by the seventh century the rise of

Moslem power had become such that in southern Europe Arab dominion had

obtained control of the Levant and Egypt. Presently the whole of the

north African coast, from the Nile to the Atlantic, fell under this

sway, and during the eighth century the Arabs overran Spain, southern

and central France, until in the same century they were forced back

across the Pyrenees. How does this affect the rise of the Mercantile

Marine? The answer is this. The Arabs were excellent sailors who were

also expert navigators, and incidentally the very word “admiral,”

which still survives in the sea service of all civilised powers, is an

Arabic word. The Arabs took to trading, and that meant the employment

of ships in the Mediterranean; so they introduced the triangular lateen

sail from east of Suez, and to this day the lateen has survived as the

characteristic local sail of Mediterranean craft. Thus between Venice

and Africa overseas trade was created, business made still further

business, and that in turn created a demand for shipping and for men

who would use the sea as a career. Later on it was the Arabs who were

to teach the Spaniards and Portuguese so much about navigation that

India and America were discovered.

In the early years of the Middle Ages, then, we have the Arabian and

the Venetian ships trading about the Mediterranean, though frequently

the former became corsairs and made havoc of the latter, even going to

the length of raiding the Adriatic. But so far the peaceable Venetian

craft were literally merchant ships: they existed for the purpose

of carrying merchandise. There enters now another element—religion.

The Catholic faith, trade, pilgrims, crusades and Arabs—all these

influences had the greatest possible effect on the development of

merchant shipping. It will be remembered that in the seventh century

the Arabs had wrested the Holy Land from the Eastern Empire, but it was

not until the latter part of the eleventh century that western Europe

was really moved to action. Finally, in 1095, a holy war against the

infidel was resolved, and there followed the first crusade; and in this

expedition Venetian ships took part. The most famous crusade of all was

that in which the English king Richard Cœur de Lion engaged, and this

ended in a truce with Saladin by September 1192, on the understanding

that pilgrims should be permitted to visit Jerusalem without being

interfered with by the Moslems.

Thus, we have in the fact of the Holy Land a magnetic attraction for

the ship. In order to carry armies and horses and pilgrims, whether

from England or Venice, to the coast of Syria, you must needs have

large numbers of ships, and of fair size and seaworthiness. This series

of voyages created also a much larger body of seamen and amassed a

tremendous amount of sea-knowledge from experience. In a word, then,

it was a new and enormous impetus to the development of the world’s

Mercantile Marine, as opposed to the purely warlike fast-moving naval

galley. The demand now was for tonnage—to carry human beings as well

as goods. Thus, notwithstanding that the crusades originated from a

strictly religious motive, actually they exercised a most remarkable

stimulus on trade, shipping and travel. Men who had never been

previously outside their own city or village became acquainted with the

sea, strange ships, new lands and novel ideas. They returned home with

fresh aspirations, the desire to carry on extended commerce, and the

realisation that shipping was the key to future riches.

To trace the fitting out of all the crusades would be to go outside

the scope of our immediate subject, but it is enough if we look for

a moment at the direct effect crusading had on the Venetian shipping

industry. The gates, so to speak, whence middle Europe could gain

access to the Holy Land were Venice, Genoa and Marseilles. Seven

years after Richard Cœur de Lion had made the truce with Saladin and

left Palestine, a new crusade was being prepared for; and inasmuch as

Venice was so distinguished a seaport, envoys came to arrange for large

quantities of shipping. Landsmen knew practically nothing about the

sea and ships. They were no better informed than the farmer of to-day

resident all his life in the middle of the United States; so they

arrived asking for advice, information and generally to be put in the

way of obtaining tonnage sufficient to carry 4500 knights, 9000 squires

and 20,000 men-at-arms. This was no small order, even for Venice, quite

apart from the further request for fifty armed galleys to accompany

and protect the expedition. It meant, in fact, the creation of an

immense Mercantile Marine at really quite short notice. Indeed it was

comparatively a much bigger task than the sudden demand for tonnage in

1917 and 1918, when the thousands and thousands of soldiers had to be

packed into steamships and brought from North America to Europe.

Venice rose to the occasion, for it was not merely a matter of business

to provide the shipping, but a matter of religion. The Holy Sepulchre

was in the hands of the infidels: that in itself was a sufficient

inspiration. And so about Pentecost in the year 1202 we can see the

hordes of pilgrims pouring down through the various passes of the Alps

to Venice. It was a huge business, and action in those days was slow

and, to our modern minds, dilatory. But the Venetians had got the ships

ready for the knights and squires and men and horses, though it was

autumn before they put to sea. Some of the cloth and provisions had

arrived in Venice in French ships via the Straits of Gibraltar, and

eventually, on October 9, the galleys and horseboats set forth from the

Adriatic port, and a month later appeared before Zara.

During the Middle Ages the three great maritime powers were Venice,

Genoa and Pisa, and between them there was the greatest rivalry, so

that scarcely ever did two of the parties meet than there was conflict.

But Venice, being the pre-eminent, incurred the greatest amount of

jealousy. The part which Venice and Genoa played in maritime history

is not confined to what they did in any particular century, but lies

rather in the fact that they kept alive and developed the seaman’s art;

until, at the beginning of the fourteenth century, the Venetians made

a crude map which put into form the ideas that inspired the first

Italian voyages in the Atlantic, and Genoa in the next century produced

Columbus, who, after being wrecked in a sea-fight with some Venetian

galleys off the Portuguese coast, settled down in Lisbon and eventually

set forth on his historic voyage to the West.

Ever since the second Punic War Genoa had been a big and important

seaport. Becoming a free city in 958, she had suffered much from

the Saracen raids, but when these infidel corsairs seemed likely to

establish themselves in Sardinia at the beginning of the eleventh

century, the Genoese and Pisan seamen united together against a common

foe, fitted out an expedition and hurled the Arab chief back to Africa.

In 1087 the Genoese and Pisans were sent by the Pope to dislodge

one Temim, a pirate chief who lived south of Tunis. The result was

important to the shipping industry; for, having beaten him and captured

his stronghold, the two cities stipulated for the free admission

of their merchant ships to trade with the Tunisian coast. Thus, in

clearing the seas of corsairs for a time, they also directly stimulated

their own commerce.

Pisan merchant ships as far back as 1052 had been trading to Egypt

and the Levant, and in 1063 Ingulf, Abbot of Croyland in England, had

returned from a pilgrimage in a Genoese merchant ship he had found at

Jaffa. But it was not until the year 1090 that the conquest of Sicily

was effected from the Mussulman hands, and thus the Straits of Messina

became safe for shipping, and the vessels from Genoa and Pisa could go

ahead in safety with their Levantine trade. By the twelfth century,

Genoese, Venetian and Pisan seamen and merchants used to meet at Acre,

to their great financial benefit, though not without manifestations of

commercial jealousy. But we must dismiss from our minds all thoughts

of single ships sailing across from Italy to the Syrian coast when

they liked. There was hardly a time when there were not some pirates

or corsairs hovering about; so the seas might be rid of one chief,

but rendered dangerous by the rovings of another. Thus it was that

shipowners had to do exactly what British mercantile owners were

compelled to resort to in the latter part of the Great War, when the

enemy was attacking so many of our trading craft—the convoy system had

to be employed.

Thus, from Venice, for instance, at regular intervals a convoy of

merchant ships would sail for Acre, escorted by as many as thirty or

forty galleys sometimes, as protection against piratical attack. If

the Venice-Acre trade route were cut, it would mean that the French,

the Germans, the Lombards, the Tuscans and other merchants would not

receive the silks, sugar, pepper and other very valuable Oriental

produce which the Venetians were bringing across in their ships. Thus

the navy of Venice was charged with the duty of protecting its merchant

fleet from the attacks of Genoese, Greek or Arab pirates. Just as

during our recent war convoys used to collect at Falmouth and other

ports prior to beginning their ocean voyage, so in the Middle Ages the

convoy—called a _mudia_—would collect at Venice, bound for Syria or

Egypt. There were only two convoys in the year, so the number of ships

was large, and well needed the strong galley protection. One convoy

left Venice in the spring and got back home in September; the other

left in August, spent the winter abroad, and returned in the following

May. In addition to these commercial convoys, there were also the

pilgrim convoys to Palestine. Genoa sent one convoy a year to Syria and

Egypt, but during the fourteenth century her ships were cruising in the

Black Sea and harassing Venetian craft which had penetrated the Sea of

Azov.

Sea-travel in those mediæval times was thus no pleasure cruise: it

was comparable only to the anxious experiences of passengers at the

height of the recent submarine campaign. Except for religion or

trade, no one ever thought of going to sea. It was too dangerous

an undertaking, so punctuated with storms, and in all respects so

thoroughly uncomfortable, that it was to be avoided as far as possible.

Consequently those who used it as a living expected to be paid very

handsomely. It is difficult in these modern times, with all the safety

and luxury which a steamship connotes, to realise the horror with which

all seafaring was regarded. The result was that artists hesitated

to depict marine subjects; and even when they did, it was usually

to show a ship having a dreadful time in heavy weather. It is for

that reason that illustrations of mediæval ships are so few, either

in stained-glass windows, carvings, devotional books, or paintings.

People had no wish to be reminded of what was to them a very unpleasant

subject, except to those hardened few who preferred ship-life to

agriculture or trade ashore. Unlike present-day conditions, the

merchant himself was compelled to go to sea. There was no other means

of his reaching his markets; but he was heartily thankful to get

himself and his goods safe into port.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] _The Early History of Venice_, by F. C. Hodgson. London, 1901. I

wish also to acknowledge indebtedness to the same author’s _Venice in

the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries_.

The mercantile marine · 第 2 / 20 章