CHAPTER LXXIII.

_Declaration of the Allies on entering

France--Switzerland--Schwartzenberg crosses the Rhine--Apathy of the

French--Junction of Blucher with the Grand Army--Crown Prince of

Sweden--Inferiority of Napoleon's numerical Force--Battles of

Brienne--and La Rothière--Difficulties of Buonaparte, during which

he meditates to resign the Crown--He makes a successful Attack on

the Silesian Army at Champ-Aubert--Blucher is compelled to

retreat--The Grand Army carries Nogent and Montereau--Buonaparte's

violence to his Generals--The Austrians resolve on a general

Retreat, as far as Nancy and Langres--Prince Wenceslaus sent to

Buonaparte's headquarters--The French enter Troyes--Execution of

Goualt, a Royalist--A Decree of Death against all wearing the

Bourbon emblems, and all Emigrants who should join the Allies._

It was time that Buonaparte should appear in the field in person, for

the eastern frontiers of his empire, assaulted on every point, were

yielding an almost unresisted entrance to the invading armies. The

allied sovereigns had commenced their operations upon a system, as

moderate and prudent in a political point of view, as it was bold and

decisive considered under a military aspect.

They had not been too much elated by the successes of the late campaign.

These had been bought at a high price, and events had shown, that if

Napoleon could be resisted and defeated, it could only be by

outnumbering his veteran armies, and accumulating such force against him

as even his skill and talents should find irresistible. They recollected

also the desperate efforts of which France and Frenchmen were capable,

and were prudently desirous to express the moderation of their purpose

in such a form as should have no chance of being mistaken.

Their manifestoes disclaimed the intention of dictating to France any

particular form of government. They only desired that she should remain

within the limits of her ancient territory, a peaceful member of the

European commonwealth, allowing to other states, as well as claiming for

herself, the full immunities of freedom and independence. The allied

sovereigns desired that there should be an end put to the system which

decided the fate of kingdoms, not according to the better right, but the

longest sword. They wished a total suppression of all domination of the

powerful over the weak; of all pretext of usurpation founded on alleged

natural boundaries, or, in other words, on the claim of a powerful state

to rend from a weak one whatever suited its convenience to possess. In a

word, they aimed at the restoration of the balance of power, which had

been long the political object of the wisest statesmen in Europe. It is

singular, that the three nations who were now united to oppose the

aggressions of Buonaparte, had themselves been the first to set the

example of violent and unprincipled spoliation in the partition of

Poland; and that they had reaped an abundant punishment in the measure

of retribution dealt to them by the instrumentality of the very man,

whose lawless outrages they, in their turn, were now combined to

chastise.

With respect to the nature of the changes which might take place in the

internal arrangements of France, in order to bring about the restoration

of the balance of power, the allied monarchs professed themselves

indifferent. If Napoleon should reconcile himself to the general

pacification they proposed, they did not pretend any right to state

objections to his remaining in authority. It was the military system of

usurpation, not the person of Buonaparte, against which they made war.

If, on the other hand, France could not return to a state of peace

without a change of her ruler, it was for France herself to consider

what that change should be. The allied sovereigns were determined she

should no longer work her uncontrolled will upon other states; but they

left her at full liberty to adopt what government, and what sovereign

she pleased, within her own territories.

[Sidenote: THE ALLIES IN SWITZERLAND.]

At the same time, having limited the purpose of their armament to such a

just and moderate object, the allies resolved to put such activity in

their measures as to satisfy the French that they had the power of

enforcing their demands; and for that purpose they determined to enter

the frontier. From Basle to Mentz, from Mentz to the mouth of the Waal,

the frontier of France and Belgium is defended by the Rhine, a strong

natural boundary in itself, and covered by a triple row of 140

fortresses, some of them of the very first class. Above Basle, where the

Rhine divides France from Switzerland, the frontier is more accessible.

But then this upper line could not be acted upon without violating the

neutrality which Switzerland had asserted, which Buonaparte had admitted

as affording protection for the weakest part of the threatened frontier,

and which, upon their own principle of respecting the rights of

neutrals, the allies were under a sort of necessity of acknowledging.

Nevertheless, the extreme facility of entering France on this side, led

Austria and Prussia to form the wish to set aside scruples, and

disregard the neutrality of Switzerland.

These two powers remembered how little respect Napoleon had shown to

neutral rights in the campaign of Ulm, when he marched without

hesitation through the Prussian territories of Anspach and Bareuth, in

order to accomplish the demolition of the Austrian army; nor did they

fail to quote his forcible interference in the affairs of the cantons of

Switzerland, at an earlier period of his history. Russia did not for

some time acquiesce in this reasoning; but when some plausible grounds

were alleged of breach of neutrality on the part of the Swiss, the

scruples of Alexander were removed; and it was resolved that the

Austrian grand army should traverse the Swiss territory for the purpose

of entering France. They halted before Geneva, and took possession of

the town, or rather it was yielded to them by the citizens.

The canton of Bern, also, which resented some alterations made by

Napoleon to the prejudice of their feudal claims upon the Pays de Vaud,

received the Austrians not as intruders but as friends. Buonaparte, in

his manifestoes, insisted vehemently upon the injustice of this

aggression upon the territories of the Swiss. Undoubtedly the

transaction was of a questionable character; but it was inconsistent in

Napoleon to declaim against it, since, in the case of the arrest of the

Duke d'Enghien, he had laid it down as national law, that the violation

of the territory of Baden was an offence pleadable by no other than the

sovereign of that territory. On his own doctrine, therefore, it was

incompetent in any other nation to resent, on behalf of the Swiss, that

which the Swiss did not resent for themselves.

Upon the 21st December, Maréchal Prince Schwartzenberg crossed the Rhine

with the Austrian army at four points, and advanced upon Langres, as had

been previously agreed. Moving with the extreme slowness and precision

which characterise Austrian manœuvres, paying always the same respect

to fortresses without garrisons, and passes without guards, as if they

had been in a posture of defence, the Austrians, instead of reaching

Langres on 27th December, did not arrive till the 17th January,

1814.[321] A serious intention had been for some time manifested to

defend the place, and it was even garrisoned by a detachment of

Buonaparte's old guard. The approach of the numerous Austrian

reinforcements, however, rendered the preparations for defence of the

town unavailing, and Langres was evacuated by all the French troops,

saving about 300 men, who surrendered to General Giulay on the 17th. A

division of the Austrians was immediately advanced to Dijon.

The apathy of the French at this period may be estimated from the

following circumstance: Dijon, summoned by a flying party of cavalry,

returned for answer, that a town containing 30,000 inhabitants, could

not with honour surrender to fifteen hussars, but that if a respectable

force appeared before its walls, they were ready to give up the keys of

their city.[322] This reasonable request was complied with, and Dijon

surrendered on 19th January.[323]

The city of Lyons, the second in the empire, had itself nearly fallen

into the hands of the Austrians; but the inhabitants showed a

disposition to defend the town, and being reinforced with troops sent to

secure a place of such importance, the Austrian general, Bubna, retired

from under its walls. It is allowed, that more activity on the part of

the allies might have saved this repulse, which was of considerable

importance. It was the only one which they had yet sustained.

While the grand army, under Schwartzenberg, was thus advancing into

France, the army of Silesia, which was the name given to that commanded

by the veteran Blucher, consisting, as formerly, of Prussians and

Russians, had made equal progress, though against greater resistance and

more difficulties. His army advanced in four columns, or grand

divisions, blockading the strong frontier fortresses of Metz,

Sarre-Louis, Thionville, Luxembourg, and others, passing the defiles of

the Vosges, and pushing forward to Joinville, Vitry, and Saint Dizier.

The army of Silesia was thus placed in communication with the grand

army, the advanced divisions of which had penetrated as far into France

as Bar-sur-Aube.[324]

[Sidenote: BERNADOTTE--HOLLAND.]

There was yet a third army of the allies, called that of the North of

Europe. It was originally commanded by the Prince Royal of Sweden, and

consisted of Swedes, Russians, and Germans. But the Crown Prince, whose

assistance had been of such material consequence during the campaign of

1813, did not, it appears, take an active share in that of 1814. There

may have been two reasons and weighty ones for this inactivity. To

assist in driving the French out of Germany, seemed a duty which the

Prince of Sweden could not, as such, decline, when the welfare of Sweden

demanded it. But an invasion of his native soil might seem to Bernadotte

a service unpleasing and unpopular in itself, and in which he could not

be so rightfully engaged, at least while the freedom of Germany and the

north opened another field of exertions, where his military efforts

could be attended with no injury to his personal feelings. Denmark was

still in arms, and Davoust still held out at Hamburgh; and the presence

of the Swedish army and its leader was necessary to subdue the one, and

clear the north from the other. It must also be remembered, that Sweden,

a poor kingdom, was not in a condition to sustain a war at a great

distance from its frontier, and arising out of causes in which it was

more remotely concerned. Her armies could not be recruited with the same

ease as those of the greater powers; and Bernadotte, therefore, rather

chose to incur the censure of being supposed cold in the cause of his

confederates, than the risk of losing the only body of troops which

Sweden had been able to fit out, and upon preserving which his throne

probably depended. The allied sovereigns, however, directed, that while

the Crown Prince remained in the north, a part of the Russian and

Prussian corps, who were placed under his command, should be ordered to

march towards France, for the purpose of augmenting the force which they

already possessed in Holland and Belgium. The Crown Prince having, by a

short war with Denmark, compelled that power to yield up her ancient

possession of Norway, left Bennigsen to continue the siege of Hamburgh,

and advanced in person to Cologne, to assist in the complete liberation

of Belgium.[325]

The French troops, which had been drawn together, had been defeated at

Merxem by General Bulow, and Sir Thomas Graham; and although the French

flag was still flying at Antwerp and Bergen-op-Zoom, Holland might be

considered as liberated. General Winzengerode, at the head of the

Russian troops, and the Saxons, under Thielman, being the corps

detached, as above mentioned, from the army of the North of Germany,

soon reached the Low Countries, and entered into communication with

Bulow. General Sir Thomas Graham, with the English and Saxons, and with

such Dutch and Flemish troops as could be collected, was left to

blockade Bergen-op-Zoom and Antwerp, whilst Bulow and Winzengerode were

at liberty to enter France on the northern frontier: And thus, in the

hour of need (which soon afterwards arrived,) they were to act as a

reserve to the army of Silesia under Blucher. They pushed on as far as

Laon.

[Sidenote: PROGRESS OF THE ALLIES.]

These advances, which carried the armies of the allies so far into the

bosom of France, and surrounded with blockades the frontier fortresses

of that kingdom, were not made without an honourable though ineffectual

opposition, on such points where the French military could make any

stand against the preponderating numbers of the invaders. The people of

the country in general neither welcomed nor opposed the allies. In some

places they were received with acclamation--in a few others some

opposition was tendered--they encountered desperate resistance nowhere.

The allies did all that discipline could to maintain strict order among

their troops; but where there were so many free corps--Huhlans, Croats,

and Cossacks--whose only pay is what they can plunder, occasional

transgressions necessarily took place. The services of these irregular

troops were, however, indispensable. The Cossacks, in particular, might

be termed the eyes of the army. Accustomed to act in small parties when

necessary, they threaded woods, swam rivers, and often presented

themselves unexpectedly in villages many miles distant from the main

army to which they belonged, thus impressing the French with an idea of

the numbers and activity of the allies far beyond the truth. These Arabs

of the North, as Napoleon termed them, always announced their party as

the advanced guard of a considerable force, for whom they ordered

provisions and quarters to be prepared; and thus awed the inhabitants

into acquiescence in their demands. They are not reported to have been

cruel, unless when provoked, but were not in general able to resist

temptations to plunder. The excursions of these and other light troops

were of course distressing to the French territory.

On the other hand, in two or three cases, armed citizens in the towns,

summoned by small parties of the allies, fired upon flags of truce, and

thus justified severe reprisals. It was said to be by Buonaparte's

strict orders, that such actions were committed, the purpose being, if

possible, to excite deadly hatred betwixt the French and the allies.

Indeed, in the reverse of the circumstances, in which each had formerly

stood, Napoleon and the Austrian generals seemed to have exchanged

system and sentiments. He now, as the Archduke Charles did in 1809,

called out every peasant to arms; while Schwartzenberg, like Napoleon at

that earlier period, denounced threats of military execution, without

mercy or quarter, to every rustic who should obey the summons. The

impartial historian must proclaim, in the one case as in the other, that

the duty of resistance in the defence of our native country, does not

depend on the character of a man's weapons, or the colour of his coat;

and that the armed citizen is entitled, equally with the regular

soldier, to the benefit of the laws of war, so long as he does not

himself violate them. But from these various causes, it was plain that

the present apathy of the French people was only temporary, and that

some sudden and unforeseen cause was not unlikely to rouse so sensitive

and high-spirited a people into a state of general resistance, by which

the allies could not fail to be great sufferers. Rapidity in their

movements was the most obvious remedy against such a danger; but this

was the military quality least proper to coalitions, where many people

must be consulted; and besides, was inconsistent with the well-known

habits of the Germans, but especially of the Austrians.

It seems also, that the allies, having safely formed an almost complete

military line from Langres to Chalons, found themselves at some loss how

to use their advantages. Nothing could be better situated than their

present position, for such a daring enterprise as was now termed a

_Hourra_ upon Paris; and as all the high-roads, departing from various

points of the extensive line which they held, converged on the capital

as a common centre, while the towns and villages, through which these

roads passed, afforded an ample supply of provisions, this march might

have been accomplished almost without opposition, but for the tardy

movements of the grand army. The real weakness of Napoleon had been

disguised by the noisy and exaggerated rumours concerning his

preparations; and now when the allies learned that such an opportunity

had existed, they learned, at the same time, that it was wellnigh lost,

or at least that the road to Paris must first be cleared by a series of

bloody actions. In these the allies could not disguise from themselves

the possibility of their receiving severe checks; and under this

apprehension they began to calculate the consequences of such a defeat,

received in the centre of France, as that which they had suffered under

the walls of Dresden. There was here no favourable screen of mountains

to secure their retreat, no strong positions for checking a pursuing

army, as in the case of Vandamme, and turning a defeat into a victory.

The frontier which they had passed was penetrated, not subdued--its

fortresses, so strong and numerous, were in the greater part masked, not

taken--so that their retreat upon the Rhine must be exposed to all the

dangers incident to passing in disorder through a country in complete

possession of the enemy.

General councils of war seldom agree upon recommending bold measures. In

this sense, Solomon says, that in the multitude of counsellors there is

safety; meaning that the most cautious, if not the wisest measures, are

sure to have the approbation of the majority.

Accordingly, this spirit predominating in the councils of the allies,

led to a degree of uncertainty in their movements on this momentous

occasion, which, as is usual, endeavoured to disguise itself under the

guise of prudence. They resolved that the grand army should halt a short

space at Langres, in hopes either that Napoleon, renewing the

negotiation, the scene of which was now to be transferred to Chatillon

upon the Seine, would avert his present danger, by acquiescing in the

terms of the allies; or that the French nation, an event still less

likely to happen, would become tired of the military monarch, whose

ambition had brought such distress upon the country. In the meanwhile,

the allies declined the offers of such royalists as came forward in the

name, and for the interest, of the exiled family; uniformly replying,

that they would give no weight to any expression of the sentiments of

the French people, unless it was made in some quarter of the kingdom

where it could not be supposed to be influenced by the presence of the

allied army. They trusted chiefly at that moment to the effect of

negotiation with the present possessor of the throne.[326]

[Sidenote: STATE OF THE ARMIES--BRIENNE.]

But Napoleon, as firmly determined in his purpose as the allies were

doubtful, knowing himself to be the soul of his army, and absolute lord

of his own actions, felt all the advantage which a bold, active, and

able swordsman has in encountering an opponent whose skill is less

distinguished, and whose determination is more flexible than his own.

The allies had presented in the grand army a front of 97,000 men,

Maréchal Blucher one of 40,000, affording a disposable force of

137,000.[327] To oppose this the French Emperor had only, of old troops,

independent of those under Suchet in Catalonia, under Soult near

Bayonne, and also of garrisons, about 50,000 men; nor could he hope to

add to them more than 70,000 conscripts.[328] Nay, in fact his levies,

so far as they could be brought into the field, fell greatly short of

this number; for the allies were in possession of a considerable part of

the kingdom of France, and, in this moment of general confusion, it was

impossible to enforce the law of conscription, which was at all times

obnoxious. It was soon proved, that he who so lately had led half a

million of men to the Vistula, and 300,000 to the banks of the Elbe,

could not now muster, for the protection of the capital of his own

empire, a disposable force of more than 70,000 men.

The defensive war had no doubt considerable advantages to one who knew

so well how to use them. The highways, by which the allies must advance,

formed a half or quarter circle of rays, converging, as already

mentioned, on Paris as a centre. A much smaller army might, therefore,

oppose a large one, because, lying between Paris and the enemy, they

must occupy the same roads by a much shorter line of communication than

the invaders, who were farther from the centre, where the roads diverged

to a greater distance from each other. With this advantage of

collocation to balance a great inferiority in numerical force,

Buonaparte advanced to play for the most momentous stake ever disputed,

with a degree of military skill which has never been matched.

Arrived at Chalons on the 26th January, Buonaparte took the command of

such an army as he had been able to assemble, by the concentration of

the troops under the Maréchals Victor, Marmont, Macdonald, and Ney, all

of whom had retreated from the frontier. So much were the French corps

d'armée reduced, that these great and distinguished generals, who, in

former times, would have commanded 60,000 or 70,000 men each, had under

them all, when concentrated, but a total of 52,000, to which Napoleon

was only able to add about 20,000, brought from Paris. But no one ever

understood better than Buonaparte, the great military doctrine, that

victory does not depend on the comparative result of numerical

superiority in general, but on the art of obtaining such a superiority

on the field of action itself.

Blucher was, as usual, the foremost in advance, and Napoleon resolved to

bestow on this active and inveterate enemy, the terrible honour of his

first attack, hoping to surprise the Silesian corps d'armée before it

could receive succour from the army of Schwartzenberg. The maréchal was

apprised of the Emperor's purpose, and lost no time in concentrating his

forces at Brienne, on the Aube, fourteen miles below Bar. This is a

small village, seated on the ascent of a hill. The place has but two

streets; one of which ascends to the Chateau, occupied formerly as a

royal academy for young persons designed for the army; the other

conducts to Arcis-sur-Aube. The Chateau is partly surrounded by a park

or chase. It was at the military school of Brienne that Napoleon

acquired the rudiments of that skill in the military art with which he

had almost prostrated the world, and had ended by placing it in array

against him; and it was here he came to commence what seemed his last

series of efforts for victory;--like some animals of the chase, who,

when hard pressed by the hunters, are said to direct their final

attempts at escape upon the point from which they have first started.

The alert movements of Napoleon surpassed the anticipation of Blucher.

He was at table with his staff in the Chateau. General Alsusieff, a

Russian, occupied the town of Brienne, and General Sacken's corps was

drawn up in columns, on the road from Brienne to La Rothière. At once a

horrible tumult was heard. The Russian cavalry, 2000 in number, were

completely driven in by those of Napoleon, and at the same moment Ney

attacked the town; while a body of French grenadiers, who, favoured by

the wooded and broken character of the ground, had been enabled to get

into the park, threatened to make prisoners all who were in the Chateau.

Blucher, with his officers, had barely time to reach a postern, where

they were under the necessity of leading their horses down a stair, and

in that way made their escape with difficulty. The bold resistance of

Alsusieff defended the town against Ney, and Sacken advanced to

Alsusieff's assistance. The Cossacks also fell on the rear of the French

in the park, and Buonaparte's own safety was compromised in the

mêlée.[329] Men were killed by his side, and he was obliged to draw his

sword in his own defence. At the very moment of attack, his attention

was engaged by the sight of a tree, which he recollected to be the same

under which, during the hours of recreation at Brienne, he used, when a

school-boy, to peruse the Jerusalem Delivered of Tasso. If the curtain

of fate had risen before the obscure youth, and discovered to him in the

same spot, his own image as Emperor of France, contending against the

Scythians of the desert for life and power, how wonderful would have

seemed the presage, when the mere concurrence of circumstances strikes

the mind of those who look back upon it with awful veneration for the

hidden ways of Providence! Lefebvre Desnouettes fell, dangerously

wounded, in charging at the head of the guards. The town caught fire,

and was burned to the ground; but it was not until eleven at night that

the Silesian army ceased to make efforts for recovering the place, and

that Blucher, retreating from Brienne, took up a position in the rear of

that town, and upon that of La Rothière.

[Sidenote: BATTLE OF LA ROTHIÈRE--TROYES.]

The result of the battle of Brienne was indecisive, and the more

unsatisfactory to Buonaparte, as the part of Blucher's force engaged did

not amount to 20,000 men, and the sole advantage gained over them, was

that of keeping the field of battle. Napoleon's principal object, which

was to divide Blucher from the grand army, had altogether failed. It was

necessary, however, to proclaim the engagement as a victory, and much

pains was taken to represent it as such. But when it was afterwards

discovered to be merely a smart skirmish, without any material results,

the temporary deception only served to injure the cause of Napoleon.

On the first of February, Blucher, strongly reinforced from the grand

army, prepared in his turn to assume the offensive. It would have been

Napoleon's wish to have avoided an engagement; but a retreat across the

Aube, by the bridge of Lesmont, which was the only mode of passing that

deep and scarce fordable river, would have exposed his rear to

destruction. He therefore risked a general action. Blucher attacked the

line of the French on three points, assaulting at once the villages of

La Rothière, Dienville, and Chaumont. The conflict, in which the Prince

Royal of Wirtemberg distinguished himself, was hard fought during the

whole day, but in the evening, the French were repulsed on all points,

and Buonaparte was compelled to retreat across the Aube, after losing

4000 prisoners, and no less than seventy-three guns. Ney, by the

Emperor's orders, destroyed the bridge at Lesmont. The allies were not

aware of the amount of their advantage, and suffered the French to

retire unmolested.[330]

A general council of war, held at the castle of Brienne [Feb. 2,] now

resolved that the two armies (although having so lately found the

advantage of mutual support) should separate from each other, and that

Blucher, detaching himself to the northward, and uniting under his

command the division of D'Yorck and Kleist, both of whom had occupied

St. Dizier and Vitry, should approach Paris by the Marne; while Prince

Schwartzenberg and the grand army should descend on the capital by the

course of the Seine. The difficulty of finding provisions for such

immense armies was doubtless in part the cause of this resolution. But

it was likewise recommended by the success of a similar plan of

operations at Dresden, and afterwards at Leipsic, where the enemies of

Buonaparte approached him from so many different quarters as to render

it impossible for him to make head against one army without giving great

opportunity of advantage to the others.[331]

Buonaparte reached Troyes, on which he retreated after crossing the

Aube, in a disastrous condition; but his junction with his old guard,

whose appearance and high state of appointments restored courage to the

dejected troops who had been beaten at La Rothière, gave a new impulse

to the feelings of his army, and restored the young levies to

confidence. He resolved, taking advantage of the division of the two

armies of the allies, to march upon that of Blucher. But, in order to

disguise his purpose, he first sent a small division upon Bar-sur-Seine,

to alarm the Austrians with an attack upon their right wing.[332]

Schwartzenberg immediately apprehended that Buonaparte was about to move

with his whole force in that direction; a movement which, in fact, would

have been most favourable for the allies, since it would have left the

road to Paris undefended, and open to the whole. But, terrified by the

idea that his left flank might be turned or forced, the Austrian general

moved his chief strength in that direction; thus at once suspending his

meditated march on the Seine, and increasing the distance betwixt the

grand army and that of Silesia. Buonaparte having deceived

Schwartzenberg by this successful feint, evacuated Troyes, leaving the

Maréchals Victor and Oudinot to oppose the Austrians with very

inadequate means, while he directed his own march against Blucher.

Blucher, in the meanwhile, having left Napoleon in front of the grand

army, and not doubting that the Austrians would find him sufficient

employment, hurried forward to the Marne, forced Macdonald to retreat

from Chateau Thierry, and advanced his headquarters to Vertus; while

Sacken, who formed his vanguard, pushed his light troops as far as Ferté

la Jouarre, and was nearer to Paris than was the Emperor himself.

General D'Yorck had advanced as far as Meaux, and Paris was in the last

degree of alarm.

Even Buonaparte himself was so much struck by the inextricable situation

of his affairs after the defeat of La Rothière, that a thought occurred

to him, which posterity, excepting on his own avowal, would hardly give

credit to. The plan which suggested itself, was that of sacrificing his

own authority to the peace of France, and of abdicating the crown in

favour of the Bourbons, while he had yet the means of resistance in his

possession. He felt he had reigned and combated long enough for his own

glory, and justly thought that the measure of his renown would be filled

up by such an act of generous self-denial. But a maxim occurred to him,

(suggested, he says, by Mr. Fox,) that restored monarchs could never

forgive those who had occupied their place. Probably his thoughts turned

also to the murder of the Duke d'Enghien; for there was no other point

of personal offence betwixt Buonaparte and the exiled family, which

their restoration, if the event took place by his intervention, might

not have fully atoned for. If our conjecture be real, it serves to show

how such a crime operates in its consequences to obstruct its

perpetrator in future attempts to recover the path of virtue and

honour. Had Napoleon been really capable of the generous act of

self-denial which he meditated, he must have been ranked, in despite of

the doubtful points of his character, as one of the greatest men who

ever lived.

But the spirit of egotism and suspicion prevailed, and the hopes of

accomplishing the discomfiture and defeat of the Silesian army, appeared

preferable to meriting, by one act of disinterested devotion, the

eternal gratitude of Europe; and the philosopher and friend of humanity

relapsed into the warrior and conqueror. There is, no doubt, something

meritorious in the conceiving of great and noble resolutions, even

although they remain unrealised. But this patriotism of the imagination

does not rise to a higher scale of merit, than the sensibility of those

who cannot hear a tale of sorrow without weeping, but whose sympathy

never assumes the expensive form of actual charity.

[Sidenote: ATTACK ON BLUCHER.]

The army of Napoleon was now to be transferred from the high-road

leading from Paris to Troyes, to that leading from Chalons to Paris, on

which Blucher was operating, and that by flank marches through an

impracticable country; but which, if they could be accomplished, would

enable the French Emperor to attack the Silesian army at unawares in

flank and rear. The lateral cross-roads, which connect one highway with

another through France, are generally scarce passable in winter, even

for the purpose of ordinary communication, much less for an army with

its carriages and artillery. Buonaparte had to traverse a country

intersected with thickets, marshes, drains, ditches, and impediments of

every kind; the weather was execrable, and but for the extraordinary

exertions of the Mayor of Barbonne, who collected 500 horses to

extricate the guns, they must have been abandoned on the road. But by

dint of perseverance, Buonaparte accomplished this forced march, on 10th

of February, and the flank of the Silesian army was in consequence

placed at his mercy.[333] They were moving on without the least

suspicion of such an attack. Sacken led the advance, the Russian General

Alsusieff followed, and Blucher himself brought up the rear with the

main body. All intent upon the advance to Paris, they were marching with

careless haste, and had suffered such large intervals to take place

betwixt their divisions, as to expose them to be attacked in detail.

Buonaparte fell upon the central division of Alsusieff, at Champ-Aubert,

surrounded, defeated, and totally dispersed them, taking their

artillery, and 2000 prisoners, while the remainder of the division fled

into the woods, and attempted to escape individually. The whole force of

the Emperor was now interposed between the advanced-guard under Sacken,

and the main body under Blucher. It was first directed towards the

former, whom Napoleon encountered sooner than he expected, for Sacken,

on hearing of the action at Champ-Aubert, instantly countermarched his

division to assist Alsusieff, or at least to rejoin Blucher; but he was

overwhelmed by the superior force of the French, and having lost

one-fourth of his division, about 5000 men, was forced to leave the

high-road, upon which Blucher was advancing, and retreat by that on

Chateau-Thierry. At this village Sacken was joined by General D'Yorck

and Prince William of Prussia; but, still unable to make a stand, they

could only secure a retreat by destroying the bridge over the Marne. War

began now to show itself in its most hideous forms. The stragglers and

fugitives who could not cross the bridge before its destruction, were

murdered by the peasantry, while the allied soldiers, in revenge,

plundered the village of Chateau-Thierry, and practised every excess of

violence. The defeat of Sacken took place on the 12th of February.[334]

Blucher, in the meanwhile, ignorant of the extent of the force by which

his vanguard had been attacked, pressed forward to their support, and,

in a wide and unenclosed country, suddenly found himself in the front of

the whole army of Napoleon, flushed with the double victory which they

had already gained, and so numerous as to make a retreat indispensable

on the part of the Prussians. Blucher, if surprised, remained

undismayed. Having only three regiments of cavalry, he had to trust for

safety to the steadiness of his infantry. He formed them into squares,

protected by artillery, and thus commenced his retreat by alternate

divisions; those battalions which were in motion to the rear, being

protected by the fire of the others then standing fast, and covering

them with theirs while they retired in turn. The French cavalry, though

so strong as to operate at once on the flanks and rear, failed in being

able to break a single square. After the Prussians had retired several

leagues in this manner, fighting every foot of their way, they were

nearly intercepted by a huge column of French horse, which, having made

a circuit so as to pass them, had drawn up on the causeway to intercept

their retreat. Without a moment's hesitation, Blucher instantly attacked

them with such a murderous fire of infantry and artillery, as forced

them from the high-road, and left the passage free. The Prussians found

the village of Etoges, through which they were obliged to pass, also

occupied by the enemy; but here also they cleared their way by dint of

fighting. This expedition of the Marne, as it is called, is always

accounted one of Napoleon's military _chefs-d'œuvre_; for a flank

march undertaken through such a difficult country, and so completely

successful, is not perhaps recorded in history. On the other hand, if

Blucher lost any credit by the too great security of his march, he

regained it by the masterly manner in which he executed his retreat. Had

the army which he commanded in person shared the fate of his vanguard,

it is probable there would have been no campaign of Paris.[335]

The Parisians, in the meantime, saw at length actual proofs that

Napoleon had been victorious. Long columns of prisoners moved through

their streets, banners were displayed, the cannon thundered, the press

replied, and the pulpit joined, in extolling and magnifying the dangers

which the citizens had escaped, and the merits of their preserver.[336]

[Sidenote: MONTEREAU.]

In the midst of the joy natural on such an occasion, the Parisians

suddenly learned that the town of Fontainbleau was occupied by Hungarian

hussars, and that not Cossacks only, but Tartars, Baskirs, and Kalmouks,

tribes of a wild and savage aspect, a kind of Asiatic Ogres, to whom

popular credulity imputed a taste for the flesh of children, had

appeared in the neighbourhood of Nangis. These renewed signs of

approaching danger arose from the grand army of the allies having

carried, at the point of the bayonet, Nogent and Montereau, and advanced

the headquarters of the monarchs to Pont-sur-Seine. This alarm to Paris

was accompanied by another. Schwartzenberg, learning the disasters on

the Marne, not only pushed forward from three directions on the capital,

but despatched forces from his right towards Provins, to threaten

Napoleon's rear and communications. Leaving the pursuit of Blucher, the

Emperor countermarched on Meaux, and, marching from thence to Guignes,

he joined the army of Oudinot and Victor, who were retreating before

Schwartzenberg. He here found the reinforcements which he had drawn from

Spain, about 20,000 in number, tried and excellent troops. With this

army he now fronted that of Schwartzenberg, and upon the 17th February,

commenced the offensive at all points, and with success, possessing

himself of Nangis, and nearly destroying the corps under Count Pahlen at

Mormant. The Prince Royal of Wirtemberg was forced to retreat to

Montereau.

So alarmed were the allies at the near approach of their terrible enemy,

that a message was sent to Napoleon from the allied sovereigns, by

Prince Schwartzenberg's aide-de-camp, Count Par, stating their surprise

at his offensive movement, since they had given orders to their

plenipotentiaries at Chatillon to sign the preliminaries of peace, on

the terms which had been assented to by the French envoy, Caulaincourt.

This letter, of which we shall hereafter give a more full explanation,

remained for some days unanswered, during which Napoleon endeavoured to

push his advantages. He recovered the bridge at Montereau, after a

desperate attack, in which the Crown Prince of Wirtemberg signalized

himself by the valour of his defence. In the course of the action

Napoleon returned to his old profession of an artilleryman, and pointed

several guns himself, to the great delight of the soldiers. They

trembled, however, when the fire attracted the attention of the enemy,

whose balls began to be aimed at the French battery. "Go, my children,"

said Buonaparte, ridiculing their apprehensions; "the ball is not cast

that is to kill me."

Having taken the place by storm, Buonaparte, dissatisfied with the

number of men he had lost, loaded with reproaches some of his best

officers. Montbrun was censured for want of energy, and Digeon for the

scarcity of ammunition with which the artillery was served; but it was

chiefly on Victor, the Duke of Belluno, that his resentment discharged

itself. He imputed to him negligence, in not having attacked Montereau

on the day before the action, when it was unprovided for resistance; and

he ordered him to retire from the service. The marshal endeavoured to

obtain a hearing in his own defence, but for some time could not succeed

in checking the stream of reproaches. At length they were softened into

a charge of broken health, and the love of repose, incident to wounds

and infirmities. "The best bed," said the Emperor, "which the quarters

afford must now be sought out for the once indefatigable Victor." The

marshal felt the charge more severely in proportion as it became

moderated within what was probably the bounds of truth; but he would not

consent to quit the service. "I have not," he said, "forgot my original

trade. I will take a musket. Victor will become a private in the

Guard."--Buonaparte could not resist this mark of attachment. He held

out his hand.--"Let us be friends," he replied; "I cannot restore to you

your corps d'armée, which I have given to Girard; but I will place you

at the head of two divisions of the Guard. Go--assume your command, and

let there be no more of this matter betwixt us."[337]

It was upon such occasions, when he subdued his excited feelings to a

state of kindness and generosity, that Buonaparte's personal conduct

seems to have been most amiable.

The allies, in the meantime, remembering perhaps, though somewhat of the

latest, the old fable of the bunch of arrows, resolved once more to

enter into communication with the Silesian army, and, concentrating near

Troyes, to accept of battle, if Buonaparte should offer it. The

indefatigable Blucher had already recruited his troops, and, being

reinforced by a division of the army of the North, under Langeron, moved

southward from Chalons, to which he had retreated after his disaster at

Montmirail, to Mery, a town situated upon the Seine, to the north-east

of Troyes, to which last place the allied monarchs had again removed

their headquarters. Here he was attacked with fury by the troops of

Buonaparte who made a desperate attempt to carry the bridge and town,

and thus prevent the proposed communication between the Silesian army

and that of Schwartzenberg. The bridge, which was of wood, was set fire

to in the struggle. The sharpshooters fought amid its blazing and

cracking beams. The Prussians, however, kept possession of Mery.

[Sidenote: RETREAT OF THE AUSTRIANS.]

A council of war was now held by the allies. Blucher urged the

fulfilment of their original purpose of hazarding an action with

Napoleon. But the Austrians had again altered their mind, and determined

on a general retreat as far as the line between Nancy and Langres; the

very position on which the allies had paused when they first entered

France. The principal cause alleged for this retrograde movement, by

which they must cede half the ground they had gained since their

entering France, was, that Augereau, who had hitherto contented himself

with his successful defence of Lyons, had been recruited by considerable

bodies of troops from the army of Suchet, which had been employed in

Catalonia. Thus reinforced, the French marshal was now about to assume

the offensive against the Austrian forces at Dijon, act upon their

communications with Switzerland, and raise in a mass the warlike

peasantry of the departments of the Doubs, the Saonne, and the mountains

of the Vosges. To prevent such consequences, Schwartzenberg sent General

Bianchi to the rear with a large division of his forces, to support the

Austrians at Dijon; and conceived his army too much weakened by this

detachment to retain his purpose of risking a general action. It was

therefore resolved, that if the headquarters of the grand army were

removed to Langres, those of Blucher should be once more established on

the Marne,[338] where, strengthened by the arrival of the northern army,

which was now approaching from Flanders, he might resume his

demonstration upon Paris, in case Buonaparte should engage himself in

the pursuit of the grand army of the allies.

This retrograde movement gave much disgust to the Austrian soldiers, who

considered it as the preface to a final abandonment of the invasion.

Their resentment showed itself not only in murmurs and in tearing out

the green boughs with which, as in sign of victory, they usually

ornament their helmets and schakos, but also, as is too frequently the

case in similar instances, in neglect of discipline, and excesses

committed in the country.

To diminish the bad effects arising from this discontent among the

troops, Schwartzenberg published an order of the day,[339] commanding

the officers to enforce the strictest discipline, and at the same time

explain to the army that the present retreat was only temporary, and

that on joining with its reserves, which had already crossed the Rhine,

the grand army would instantly resume the offensive, while Field-marshal

Blucher, at present moving northward, so as to form a junction with

Winzengerode and Bulow, should at the same time attack the rear and

flank of the enemy. The publishing this plan of the campaign, went far

to rouse the dejected confidence of the Austrian army.

On the evening of the 22d February, an answer to the letter of

Schwartzenberg was received, but it was addressed exclusively to the

Emperor of Austria; and while its expressions of respect are bestowed

liberally on that power, the manner in which the other members of the

coalition are treated, shows unabated enmity, ill-concealed under an

affectation of contempt. The Emperor of France expressed himself willing

to treat upon the basis of the Frankfort declaration, but exclaimed

against the terms which his own envoy, Caulaincourt, had proposed to the

plenipotentiaries of the other powers. In short, the whole letter

indicated, not that Napoleon desired a general peace with the allies,

but that it was his anxious wish to break up the coalition, by making a

separate peace with Austria. This counteracted in spirit and letter the

purpose of the confederates, distinctly expressed in their communication

to Napoleon.

The Emperor Francis and his ministers were resolved not to listen to any

proposals which went to separate the Austrian cause from that of their

allies. It was therefore at first resolved that no answer should be sent

to the letter; but the desire of gaining time for bringing up the

reserves of the grand army, who were approaching the Swiss frontier

under the direction of the Prince of Hesse-Homberg, as also for the

union of the army of the north, under Bulow and Winzengerode, with that

of Silesia, determined them to accept the offer of a suspension of

hostilities. Under these considerations, Prince Wenceslaus of

Lichtenstein was sent to the headquarters of Napoleon, to treat

concerning an armistice. The Emperor seemed to be in a state of high

hope, and called upon the Austrians not to sacrifice themselves to the

selfish views of Russia, and the miserable policy of England. He

appointed Count Flahault his commissioner to negotiate for a line of

demarcation, and directed him to meet with the envoy from the allies at

Lusigny, on 24th February.[340]

On the night of the 23d, the French bombarded Troyes, which the allied

troops evacuated according to their latest plan of the campaign. The

French entered the town on the 24th, when the sick and wounded, left

behind by the allies, were dragged out to grace Napoleon's triumph; and

a scene, not less deplorable, but of another description, was performed

at the same time.

[Sidenote: EXECUTION OF GOUAULT.]

Amid the high hopes which the entrance of the allies into France had

suggested to the enemies of Buonaparte's government, five persons, the

chief of whom were the Marquis de Vidranges, and the Chevalier de

Gouault, had displayed the white cockade, and other emblems of loyalty

to the exiled family. They had received little encouragement to take so

decided a step either from the Crown Prince of Wirtemberg, or from the

Emperor Alexander; both of whom, although approving the principles on

which these gentlemen acted, refused to sanction the step they had

taken, or to warrant them against the consequences.[341] It does not

appear that their declaration had excited any corresponding enthusiasm

in the people of Troyes or the neighbourhood; and it would have been

wiser in Napoleon to have overlooked such a trifling movement, which he

might have represented as arising from the dotage of loyalty, rather

than to have, at this critical period, called the public attention to

the Bourbons, by denouncing and executing vengeance upon their

partisans. Nevertheless, Napoleon had scarce entered Troyes, when the

chevalier Gouault (the other Royalists having fortunately escaped) was

seized upon, tried by a military commission, condemned, and immediately

shot. He died with the utmost firmness, exclaiming, "_Vive le

Roi!_"[342] A violent and ill-timed decree promulgated the penalty of

death against all who should wear the decorations of the Bourbons, and

on all emigrants who should join the allies.[343] The severity of the

measure, so contrary to Napoleon's general conduct of late years towards

the Bourbons and their followers, whom he had for a long period scarce

even alluded to, made the world ascribe his unusual ferocity to an

uncommon state of apprehension; and thus it gave farther encouragement

to those into whom it was intended to strike terror.

At this period of the retreat of Schwartzenberg from Troyes, and the

movement of Blucher towards the Marne, we must leave the armies which

were contending in the interior of France, in order to retrace those

movements upon the frontiers, which, though operating at a distance,

tended at once to reinforce the invading armies, and to cripple

Napoleon's means of defence.

It is difficult for the inhabitants of a peaceful territory to picture

to themselves the miseries sustained by the country which formed the

theatre of this sanguinary contest. While Buonaparte, like a tiger

hemmed in by hounds and hunters, now menaced one of his foes, now sprung

furiously upon another, and while, although his rapid movements

disconcerted and dismayed them, he still remained unable to destroy the

individuals whom he had assailed, lest, while aiming to do so, he should

afford a fatal advantage to those who were disengaged--the scene of this

desultory warfare was laid waste in the most merciless manner. The

soldiers on both parts, driven to desperation by rapid marches through

roads blocked with snow, or trodden into swamps, became reckless and

pitiless; and, straggling from their columns in all directions,

committed every species of excess upon the inhabitants. These evils are

mentioned in the bulletins of Napoleon, as well as in the general orders

of Schwartzenberg.

The peasants, with their wives and children, fled to caves, quarries,

and woods, where the latter were starved to death by the inclemency of

the season, and want of sustenance; and the former, collecting into

small bodies, increased the terrors of war, by pillaging the convoys of

both armies, attacking small parties of all nations, and cutting off the

sick, the wounded, and the stragglers. The repeated advance and retreat

of the different contending parties, exasperated these evils. Every

fresh band of plunderers which arrived, was savagely eager after spoil,

in proportion as the gleanings became scarce. In the words of Scripture,

what the locust left was devoured by the palmer-worm--what escaped the

Baskirs, and Kirgas, and Croats of the Wolga, and Caspian, and Turkish

frontier, was seized by the half-clad, and half-starved conscripts of

Napoleon, whom want, hardship, and an embittered spirit, rendered as

careless of the ties of country and language, as the others were

indifferent to the general claims of humanity. The towns and villages,

which were the scenes of actual conflict, were frequently burnt to the

ground; and this not only in the course of the actions of importance

which we have detailed, but in consequence of innumerable skirmishes

fought in different points, which had no influence, indeed, upon the

issue of the campaign, but increased incalculably the distress of the

invaded country, by extending the terrors of battle, with fire, famine,

and slaughter for its accompaniments, into the most remote and

sequestered districts. The woods afforded no concealment, the churches

no sanctuary; even the grave itself gave no cover to the relics of

mortality. The villages were every where burnt, the farms wasted and

pillaged, the abodes of man, and all that belongs to peaceful industry

and domestic comfort, desolated and destroyed. Wolves, and other savage

animals, increased fearfully in the districts which had been laid waste

by human hands, with ferocity congenial to their own. Thus were the

evils which France had unsparingly inflicted upon Spain, Prussia,

Russia, and almost every European nation, terribly retaliated within a

few leagues of her own metropolis; and such were the consequences of a

system, which assuming military force for its sole principle and law,

taught the united nations of Europe to repel its aggressions by means

yet more formidable in extent than those which had been used in

supporting them.

FOOTNOTES:

[321] Lord Burghersh, _Operations of the Allied Armies_, p. 72.

[322] Lord Burghersh, _Operations_, &c., p. 88.

[323] "On receiving the news of the simultaneous invasion of the French

territory at so many different points, Napoleon's firmness of mind did

not forsake him. 'I am two months behind-hand,' he said; 'had I that

time at command, they should not have crossed the Rhine. This may be

attended with serious consequences; but I can do nothing single-handed.

Unless I am assisted, I must fail in the struggle.'"--SAVARY, tom. iii.,

p. 185.

[324] "Marshal Blucher established his army at Nancy in fifteen days

from the passage of the Rhine. What would have been the advantages, if,

in the same period the great armies had by the end of November advanced

to the same position? This question being put to Marshal Ney, he

answered, 'Messieurs les alliés auraient pû compter leurs journées

d'étapes jusqu'à Paris.'"--LORD BURGHERSH, _Operations_, p. 80.

[325] In a proclamation to the French, issued by Bernadotte from

Cologne, Feb. 12, he says, "Once more in sight of the banks of this

river, where I have so often fought for you, I feel a desire to

communicate to you my thoughts. It has been the constant effort of your

Government to debase every thing, that it might despise ever thing: it

is time that this system should change. All enlightened men desire the

preservation of France; they only require that she shall be no longer

the scourge of the earth. The allied sovereigns have not coalesced to

make war against nations, but to force your Government to recognise the

independence of states: Such are their intentions, and I pledge myself

to you for their sincerity."--MEREDITH'S _Memorials of Charles John_, p.

208.

[326] For the various opinions, as to the military operations to be

pursued from Langres, see the memoirs drawn up at the Prussian,

Austrian, and Russian headquarters.--_Operations_, &c., pp. 91, 94, and

104.

[327] Lord Burghersh, p. 99.

[328] Jomini, tom. iv., p. 524.

[329] "General Dejean, feeling himself closely pressed, turned about and

gave the alarm, by exclaiming, _The Cossacks!_ and at the same time

attempted to plunge his sabre into the breast of one of the assailants,

whom he thought he had secured. But the enemy had escaped; they then

darted on the horseman in the grey great-coat who was somewhat in

advance. Corbineau instantly rushed forward; Gourgaud made the same

movement, and, with a pistol-shot, stretched the Cossack dead at

Napoleon's feet."--BARON FAIN, _Manuscript de_, 1814.

[330] Lord Burghersh, Operations, &c., p. 113; Jomini, tom. iv., p. 527.

[331] Lord Burghersh, Operations, &c., p. 121.

[332] We ought to read _left_ wing. See Lord Burghersh, Operations, &c.,

p. 122.--ED. (1842.)

[333] "This bold incursion of the enemy roused Napoleon. He resolved, at

least, to make the Prussian army pay dearly for their temerity, and

formed the design of unexpectedly falling on their flank. The Emperor

was poring over his maps, with the compasses in his hand, when the Duke

of Bassano presented him with the despatches, which he had prepared for

Chatillon! 'Oh! here you are,' said Napoleon, as the duke entered the

apartment; 'but I am now thinking of something very different. I am

defeating Blucher on the map. He is advancing by the road of Montmirail;

I shall set out and beat him to-morrow. I shall beat him again the day

after to-morrow. Should this movement prove as successful as I have

reason to expect, the state of affairs will be entirely changed, and we

shall then see what must be done.'"--BARON FAIN.

[334] Jomini, tom. iv., p. 535; Burghersh, Operations, &c., p. 134.

[335] Lord Burghersh, p. 136; Jomini, tom. iv., p. 532.

[336] "No sooner had the battle of Champ-Aubert afforded a pretext for

exultation, than M. Denon ordered a medal to be executed to designate

the state of France at that moment. On the obverse, was the head of

Napoleon; on the reverse, an eagle erect; above his head was a star; his

claws rested on a thunderbolt; and on one side was the sign Pisces--on

the other a flying Victory. This was the only medal record of this

memorable campaign."--_Events at Paris_, Feb. 1814, p. 19.

[337] Baron Fain, Manuscript de, 1814.

[338] According to Lord Burghersh. (Operations, &c., p. 153,)

Schwartzenberg recommended the retreat of the Silesian army to Nancy;

but Blucher (_Ibid._, p. 186,) "took upon himself the responsibility of

declining to conform," &c.--ED., (1842.)

[339] Lord Burghersh, p. 168.

[340] Jomini, tom. iv., p. 529; Lord Burghersh, Observations, &c., p.

143.

[341] The presence of the allies in the ancient capital of Champagne,

had reanimated the hopes of the partisans of the Bourbons. The Emperor

of Russia could not help observing to them, "that he considered the step

they had taken a little premature; that the chances of war were

uncertain, and that he should be sorry to see them sacrificed."--BEAUCHAMP,

_Hist. de la Champagne de 1814_, tom. i., p. 241.

[342] It has been said that Napoleon had been persuaded to save his

life. But the result was similar to the execution, of Clarence.--S.--See

Baron Fain, Manuscript de, 1814, p. 156.

[343] Dated Troyes, Feb. 24. Moniteur, March 1.

Life of Napoleon Bonaparte, Volume IV. · 第 25 / 26 章