When war was declared the Home Rule Bill had not passed into law. A great

effort had been made to come to terms with the Ulster and the English Tory

Parties and had failed. It seemed as if the Government must either go

forward with its policy and take the risks or own defeat. It was assumed

as a matter of course that a foreign war ended _ipso facto_ all disputes

between the great English parties and that till the war should be over

internal opposition to the Government should cease. But what about

Ireland? Would the two Irish parties sink their differences in the same

way in the interest of the Empire? Would the Irish people give their

whole-hearted support and sympathy in the struggle to an England which had

so far failed to satisfy what they regarded as their elementary rights?

The choice fell to Mr. Redmond. On the one hand prudence counselled the

use of a unique opportunity: he might offer Irish support in return for

the immediate enactment of Home Rule and throw upon the Ulster Party the

onus of refusing to support the Empire in its deadly struggle. He might on

the other hand offer Irish support without conditions and leave the

satisfaction of the national claims of Ireland as a debt of honour to the

conscience of English statesmen. Had he bargained (and got his terms)

Nationalist Ireland would have been with him almost to a man: with that

simplicity of character, which, as the Greek historian says, "makes up a

great part of good breeding," he promised without conditions: England

might withdraw her soldiers from Ireland; the shores of Ireland, North and

South, would be guarded by her armed sons. The House of Commons, England

and the Empire were greatly impressed: the _beau geste_ of the Irish

leader was universally applauded. The Home Rule Bill was presented for the

Royal Signature and signed; a Suspensory Bill was hurried through

providing that its operation should be postponed; the Prime Minister

promised the enemies of Home Rule that before it was allowed to be put

into operation the Government would introduce and pass a Bill amending the

measure in such a way as to make it acceptable to its opponents; and Mr.

Redmond hurried home to rally Ireland to the cause of the Empire. The

situation was summed up later with brutal frankness by a Belfast Unionist

paper: "If the Nationalists will not enlist because the war is just, they

should not do so because they have got Home Rule; because they have not

got it. The Unionist Party has declared that when it comes into power it

will not allow the Act to stand." Even so between 40,000 and 50,000 Irish

Nationalists joined the Forces during the first year of the war.

By the time Mr. Redmond had returned to Ireland the attitude of all Irish

parties to the war had become pretty clearly defined. The Ulster

Volunteers, after about a month's hesitation on the part of their leaders,

had received official intimation that they were free to enlist. Any delay

there may have been was due, not to the feelings of the rank and file, but

to the tactics of the politicians, eager to extract the last possible

advantage from the situation. The bulk of the Nationalists, like the bulk

of the Ulstermen, were in sympathy with the cause of England and her

Allies as against Germany and the two parties sent recruits in almost

equal numbers. The attitude of Sinn Fein is put so clearly in a leader in

its official organ that it deserves quotation: "Ireland is not at war with

Germany: it has no quarrel with any Continental Power.... There is no

European Power waging war against the people of Ireland: there are two

European Powers at war with the people who dominate Ireland from Dublin

Castle.... To-day the Irish are flattered and caressed by their libellers.

England wants our aid and Mr. Redmond, true to his nature, rushes to offer

it--for nothing.... If England wins this war she will be more powerful

than she has been at any time since 1864 and she will treat the Ireland

which kissed the hand that smote her as such an Ireland ought to be

treated. If she loses the war, and Ireland is foolish enough to identify

itself with her, Ireland will deservedly share in her punishment.... We

are Irish Nationalists and the only duty we have is to stand for Ireland's

interests, irrespective of the interests of England or Germany or any

foreign country.... Let it (_i.e._ the Government) withdraw the present

abortive Home Rule Bill and pass ... a full measure of Home Rule and

Irishmen will have some reason to mobilize for the defence of their

institutions. At present they have none. In the alternative let a

Provisional Government be set up in Dublin by Mr. Redmond and Sir Edward

Carson and we shall give it allegiance. But the confidence trick has been

too often played upon us to deceive us again. If the Irish Volunteers are

to defend Ireland they must defend it for Ireland under Ireland's flag and

under Irish officers. Otherwise they will only help to perpetuate the

enslavement of their country.... Germany is nothing to us in herself, but

she is not our enemy. Our blood and our miseries are not upon her head.

But who can forbear admiration at the spectacle of the Germanic people

whom England has ringed round with enemies standing alone, undaunted and

defiant against a world in arms?" This was a clear declaration of

neutrality coupled with an offer of terms of friendship. But as the

negotiations in Parliament proceeded, as it became clear that, while Home

Rule was nominally to be passed, no effect was to be given to it for the

present, and no permanent validity to attach to the passing of it, the

tone of the Sinn Fein and Republican Press grew harder. "If the Home Rule

Bill," said _Sinn Fein_, "be signed, but not brought into immediate

operation, by the appointment of a Home Rule Executive Government, Ireland

is sold and betrayed. Let every Irishman get that into his head and keep

it there." "We regard no enemy of England as an enemy of ours.... It was

Grattan, the greatest of our constitutional leaders, who declared that if

the interests of the Empire clashed with the liberties of Ireland, then he

and every Irishman would say 'Live Ireland--perish the Empire.'" _Irish

Freedom_ which printed in capitals across its pages mottoes such as

"Germany is not Ireland's enemy," "Ireland First, Last and All the Time,"

said, "If England withdraws her troops utterly from Ireland the Irish

Volunteers will take and hold the country, hold it not alone against

Germany but against anybody else who attempts to interfere with it. And on

no other conditions will the Volunteers consent to move a step.... We are

not prepared to buy even freedom--were it offered--at the price of our

honour." It declared that "the psychological moment" had arrived for the

union of Irishmen, for the attainment of Irish liberty, and proposed for

the last time a working arrangement between the Irish Volunteers and the

Ulster Volunteers to further the real liberties of Ireland. The Labour

paper was even more outspoken. It ridiculed the parliamentary leaders for

their lack of ability in driving a bargain as compared with the more

astute Ulstermen; it ridiculed the advanced Nationalists who still talked

nonsense about a junction of the two forces of Volunteers: it declared

stoutly, "If England wants an Empire, let her hold the Empire.... Let no

Irishman leave his own land.... Keep your guns for your real enemies."

While it deplored the success of the recruiting campaign it allowed (with,

considering its own strongly expressed views, a commendable toleration)

articles to appear from Labour men giving their reasons for supporting the

war. But it had no illusions as to what was in store in the end for

Irishmen who put its ideas into practice. "For some of us," James Connolly

wrote, "the finish may be on the scaffold, for some in the prison cell,

for others more fortunate upon the battlefield of an Ireland in arms for a

real republican liberty." But as a last resort even Connolly proposed

terms of accommodation: he thought that the Volunteers by the bold policy

of refusing to move until their terms were conceded might force the

Government to repeal all clauses in the Home Rule Bill denying to Ireland

the self-government enjoyed by Canada and Australia. The last number of

his paper bore the legend "We serve neither King nor Kaiser." It had been

decided by all the political parties that then seemed to count in Ireland

that Irishmen must serve, if they served at all, not because they had

been given Home Rule but because they had not been given it--because

Ireland was still an integral part of the United Kingdom, bound to its

fortunes till the issue of the war should be determined. Three months

after war was declared the Sinn Fein, Republican and Labour papers were

suppressed by the police.

The public discussion of the terms upon which it might have been possible

to range even Separatists against Germany, the granting to Ireland of

something of her own to defend, being thus declared not to be in the

public interest, it seemed as if no obstacle remained in the way of

raising recruits all over the country. Irishmen were credited with a love

of mingling in a fight without any nice discrimination as to the grounds

of the quarrel or the merits of the dispute. "Is there not wars?" seemed

to some of the authorities to be a sufficiently potent appeal. But it was

found that there existed a confused and vague feeling that England as a

whole had at last, in spite of much English opposition, come to take a

friendly view of the Irish claim to self-government; that, if the war had

not occurred when it did, some way out of the difficulty would have been

found; that the Government was honest in its intentions and could hardly

be blamed for the tactics of its opponents. Even a slight and doubtful

indication of real friendliness on the part of England raises in Ireland a

response which must often seem to be out of proportion to the cause which

excited it; and at the beginning of the war Nationalist Ireland was ready

to respond to the call for men in a way which roused the cynical criticism

of the advanced wing of the Nationalist Party. "No English city," wrote

the _Irish Worker_ in September, 1914, "is displaying more enthusiasm than

Dublin in sending its bravest and best to murder men with whom they have

no quarrel." The Scottish Borderers, leaving for the Front, received an

enthusiastic send-off from the city in which a short while before they had

had to be confined to barracks; all over the country men were flocking to

recruit in the first few weeks of the war. Anti-English feeling was

practically smothered in a wave of enthusiasm. The Irish Volunteers, now

apparently under the assured control of the Parliamentary Party, became

the subjects of an almost embarrassing interest. Unionist peers and

gentry, retired militia officers and other people, not (to say the least)

distinguished for Irish patriotism, hastened to enrol in their ranks and

to proffer their services. The name of Major the Earl of Fingall appearing

as Chief Inspecting Officer of the Irish Volunteers in Meath in an order

signed by Colonel Maurice Moore, "Inspector-General, Irish Volunteers,"

would have seemed strange six months before and stranger still a year

afterwards. But it provoked little comment in August, 1914. It seemed as

if a miracle were about to happen and it became the apparent business of

the authorities to take steps to secure that it should not happen.

Enlistment had not been growing in popularity in Ireland for some years

before the war. In 1908, _Sinn Fein_ had pointed out with satisfaction

that the army returns showed that the number of Irishmen in the regular

army had then fallen to the lowest point upon record. The Boer War and the

anti-recruiting propaganda in Ireland had not been without their effect

upon Irish feeling and the real position and work of the army in Ireland

had been closely scrutinized. "The Curragh Mutiny" had provoked some very

pointed comments upon the spirit which really animated the army in

Ireland: it came to be looked upon as the citadel and symbol of all the

forces that opposed the claims of Ireland. "We all know in our hearts,"

said Roger Casement and Eoin MacNeill in a manifesto published in April,

1914, in the _Irish Volunteer_, "that the 'Union' means the military

occupation of Ireland as a conquered country: that the real headquarters

of Irish government on the Unionist principle is the Curragh Camp to which

the offices of Dublin Castle are only a sort of vermiform appendix." And

the functions performed by the army in Ireland would certainly have seemed

strange to anyone who felt any attachment to the views generally accepted

in England as to the relation of the army to the civil power. In the

General Orders for the guidance of the troops affording aid to the Civil

Power in Ireland, issued in 1891, the following paragraph is to be found:

"All officers in command of corps or detachments are to transmit to the

Deputy Adjutant General an immediate report of any outrages, large

meetings held or expected to be held for political or other purposes, or

occurrences that may take place in the neighbourhood of their posts

connected with the state of the country, whether they have or have not

been called upon to afford assistance to the civil power." The functions

of an army acting upon instructions like these are hardly to be

distinguished from those of an army of occupation, and Nationalist Ireland

was well aware of the efficiency with which these functions were

performed. To make enlistment popular in Ireland, even in a moment of

enthusiasm, was thus a work requiring a certain amount of tact and

discretion.

The first real difficulty arose with the Volunteers, whose services as an

army of defence had been pledged by Mr. Redmond to the Government. The

pledge had been given without the consent, or even the knowledge, of the

Volunteer Committee and they resented the implication that they could be

disposed of as if they were the private property of other people. They had

been enrolled with a definite object and any duty for which their services

were to be given must be shown to be at least not inconsistent with that

object. The committee, however, so far endorsed Mr. Redmond's offer as to

pass a resolution declaring "the complete readiness of the Irish

Volunteers to take joint action with the Ulster Volunteer Force for the

defence of Ireland." The Prime Minister promised in Parliament that the

Secretary for War would "do everything in his power, after consultation

with gentlemen in Ireland, to arrange for the full equipment and

organization of the Irish Volunteers." Whether the powers of the Secretary

for War were less extensive than the Prime Minister believed, or whether

the "gentlemen in Ireland" had other views, the scheme drawn up by General

Sir Arthur Paget and his staff "by which the War Office may be supplied

from the Irish Volunteers with a force for the defence of Ireland" was

rejected by the War Office. This, it is true, made little difference in

the end, for the Volunteer Committee, when the scheme was submitted to

them, demanded the inclusion of certain "primary conditions" which it was

not at all likely that the War Office would have accepted: but the

immediate rejection of it by the military authorities in England is

significant of the spirit in which the question of Irish recruiting was

approached. It was hostile not only to Irish ideals but to Irish

sentiment, to everything except the use to which Irish soldiers might be

put. The contrast between the treatment accorded to Irish Nationalist

recruits and the privileges granted to the Ulster Division can only be

explained on the assumption that the War Office desired to show

appreciation of the latter and suspicion of the former. The Ulster men

were allowed to retain their own officers and their own tests of

admission: the "regiments" formed under the Provisional Government of

Ulster were taken over, without alteration, by the English authorities:

they were allowed to refuse Catholics or Nationalists who offered to

enlist in their ranks: their recruiting marches were accompanied by bands

who played Orange party tunes through Catholic and Nationalist hamlets

while they went through the farce of lecturing the inhabitants on their

"duty to the Empire in this crisis." In November, 1914, an advertisement

appeared in the Dublin _Evening Mail_ announcing that a new Dublin Company

of the Royal Irish Fusiliers was to be formed to which none but Unionists

were admissible, intending recruits being directed to apply at the Orange

Hall. The Ulster Force was trained as a body in camps of its own, while

Ulster Nationalists had to take train for the South or were shipped to

England. Similar privileges were bluntly and persistently refused to the

Nationalists. The Ulstermen had their own banners: the Nationalists might

not fight under any emblem but the Union Jack, the symbol of the defeat of

their nationality, of the very Act of Union against which they were known

to be in protest. Treatment such as this could have only one result: the

people who decided upon it must have known what the result would be, and

by persisting in it showed that the result was desired. By cooling down

the enthusiasm of Nationalist Ireland they made it possible to declare

that Nationalist Ireland was "disappointing expectations" and to hint that

they had suspected all along that it was less eager to fight than had

appeared. Incidentally the result was held to justify the suspicions which

had brought it about. Irish soldiers were divided into two categories:

those whom the authorities delighted to honour and those whom they decided

to employ. It must be added that these manufactured animosities faded away

in the stress of battle. Ulstermen and Nationalists fighting side by side

covered themselves with glory and did equal credit to the old land; and no

more stringent criticisms of the treacherous and malignant policy that

divided them can be heard than from the lips of some of the men who

survived the glorious ordeal of the Somme.

But an influential body had from the first decided that the duty of

Irishmen, and especially of Irish Volunteers, was to remain in Ireland;

these were the members of the original Volunteer Committee and their

adherents: outside the Volunteer ranks they were supported by Sinn Fein,

the Republican Party and the Citizen Army. To them the supreme and

immediate duty of Irishmen, and in a special degree of the Volunteers, was

to safeguard the liberties of Ireland--a duty to which the fact of a

European war was irrelevant, except in so far as it might afford an

opportunity to strengthen and secure Irish liberty. There is little doubt

that some members of this party hoped that Germany would be victorious,

not in the interests of Germany but in the interests of Ireland, which had

little prospect of winning concessions from an England rendered invincible

by the overthrow of her most formidable rival: some of them regarded the

war as a mere struggle for commercial supremacy in which Ireland had no

interest at stake: but they would all alike have defended the shores of

Ireland against a German army which invaded them for the purposes of

annexation and conquest. To all alike the proposition that Irishmen had

any duty to enlist for foreign service in the English army was a denial of

the very fundamental article of their creed. When Mr. Redmond, then, in

his address to the Volunteers at Woodenbridge in September, 1914, urged

them to enlist for service overseas the inevitable crisis was provoked.

But the original provisional committee were now in a minority in the

counsels of the organization they had founded, and they were hampered by a

fundamental (and, indeed, intentional) ambiguity in the Volunteer pledge.

"The rights and liberties common to all Irishmen" was not a phrase which

carried its interpretation on its face. It was open to the Volunteer

followers of Mr. Redmond to say that the democracy of Great Britain had

conferred upon Ireland a "charter of liberty" and that it was the duty of

Irishmen to fight for Great Britain, keeping faith with those who had kept

faith with them. It was open to others to say that "the Thing on the

Statute Book" fell far short of conferring upon Irishmen the rights and

liberties to which they were entitled, and that the duty to secure first

that to which they were entitled precluded them from the prior performance

of any other task. The members of the original committee who took the

latter view could also urge that Mr. Redmond's original pledge that the

Volunteers would "defend the shores of Ireland" was not capable of the

gloss that "the shores of Ireland" under the circumstances was a

legitimate figure of speech for the trenches in the front line in France.

The difference of interpretation developed into a split. The members of

the original committee met in September and called a Volunteer Convention

for November 25, 1914, at which it was decided "to declare that Ireland

cannot with honour or safety take part in foreign quarrels otherwise than

through the free action of a National Government of her own; and to

repudiate the claim of any man to offer up the blood and lives of the sons

of Irishmen and Irishwomen to the services of the British Empire while no

National Government which could act and speak for the people of Ireland is

allowed to exist."

Before the split the Volunteers had numbered about 150,000; and it would

appear that the great majority of these at first sided with Mr. Redmond.

Many of them enlisted: many of them, under the title of the National

Volunteers, continued to exist as a separate body in Ireland: some at

least of them afterwards found their way back into the ranks of the Irish

Volunteers.

From the time of the Volunteer split the air was cleared politically in

Ireland: for the first time people began to know precisely where they

stood. The National Volunteers and the Parliamentary Party under Mr.

Redmond's leadership were committed, as were the Unionists, to the

unreserved and energetic prosecution of the war: all the other parties,

Sinn Fein, the Republicans, the Irish Volunteers, and the Citizen Army

adopted an attitude of watchful neutrality. Their view was bounded by the

shores of Ireland or when they cast a glance abroad it was as the

husbandman observes the clouds. They continued to differ (sometimes

sharply and vehemently) from one another: but the public, with a prophetic

disregard of the mere obvious present, began to label them

indiscriminately as Sinn Feiners. In truth common adversity was drawing

them closer together, and the apparently heterogeneous elements which went

to make up the Sinn Fein of present-day Ireland were being welded into a

unity of aim and resolution.

The results were soon apparent. During the month or so when the Volunteers

enjoyed the fleeting sunlight of aristocratic favour, the Foreign Office

had written (18th August, 1914) to H.B.M. Consul-General at Antwerp to

assist Mr. John O'Connor, M.P., and Mr. H. J. Harris in arranging for the

shipment to Ireland of certain rifles belonging to the Volunteers,

permission to export them having been obtained from the Belgian Government

by the Foreign Office. It was, no doubt, an oversight that no ammunition

for them was obtained, or could be obtained afterwards; but the rifles

came. Three months later an officer of the Volunteers who was employed in

the Ordnance Survey was dismissed without charge or notice and ordered to

leave Dublin within twenty-four hours. He was only the first of a series

of Volunteer organizers who suffered deportation under similar

circumstances. The Birmingham factory which was engaged in making guns for

the Volunteers was raided, its books and correspondence seized, and it was

ordered not to remove any goods from its premises. To be an Irish

Volunteer was to be "disaffected," and to be "disaffected" was to be

liable to summary measures of repression.

The Evolution of Sinn Fein · 第 10 / 17 段