“The concentration of the thirty or forty millions of Frenchmen was

completed and perfected; and that of the fifteen millions of Spaniards

was nearly accomplished; for nothing is more common than to convert

accident into principle. Because I did not subdue the Spaniards, it will

henceforth be argued that they were invincible. But the fact is that

they were actually conquered, and at the very moment when they escaped

me, the Cortes of Cadiz were secretly in treaty with me. They were not

delivered either by their own resistance or the efforts of the English,

but by the reverses which I sustained at distant points; and, above all,

by the error I committed in removing with all my whole forces to the

distance of a thousand leagues from them, and in having perished there;

for nobody can deny that if, as soon as I entered that country, Austria

had not declared war against me, but had left me four months longer

quietly in Spain,[6] the business would have been finished there; the

Spanish Government would have been consolidated; the public mind would

have been tranquillized; the different parties would have rallied. Three

or four years would have restored the Spaniards to profound peace and

brilliant prosperity: they would have become a compact nation, and I

should have well deserved their gratitude; for I should have saved them

from the tyranny by which they are now oppressed, and the terrible

agitations that await them.

Footnote 6:

On this very subject, Napoleon thus expressed himself: “The presence

of the General is indispensable; he is the head, he is the whole of an

army. It was not the Roman army that subdued Gaul, but Cæsar; it was

not the Carthaginian army that made the Republic tremble at the gates

of Rome, but Hannibal; it was not the Macedonian army that was on the

Indus, but Alexander; it was not the French army that carried the war

to the Weser and the Inn, but Turenne; it was not the Prussian army

that for seven years defended Prussia against the greatest powers of

Europe, but Frederick the Great.” (_Memoires de Napoleon, tom. 2. p.

90._)

“With regard to the fifteen millions of Italians, their concentration

was already far advanced: it only wanted maturity. The people were daily

becoming more firmly established in the unity of principles and

legislation; and also in the unity of thought and feeling, that certain

and infallible cement of human concentration. The union of Piedmont with

France, and the junction of Parma, Tuscany and Rome, were, in my mind,

but temporary measures, intended merely to guarantee and promote the

national education of the Italians.[7] You may judge of the correctness

of my views, and of the influence of common laws. The portions of Italy

that had been united to France, though that union might have been

regarded as the insult of conquest on our part, were, in spite of their

Italian patriotism, the very parts that continued by far the most

attached to us. Now that they are restored to themselves, they conceive

that they have been invaded and disinherited; and so they certainly have

been!...

Footnote 7:

So important a determination, as that of the future abandonment of

Italy, thus pronounced for the first time, and in a manner so

indifferent, without the development of any object, or the support of

any proof, would be, I confess, entitled to no higher consideration,

than the assertions that are so frequently hazarded and excused in the

warmth of conversation. But time and intimacy have taught me that

every declaration made by Napoleon, under such circumstances, carried

along with it its full, whole, and literal meaning. I have always

found this to be the case whenever I have had the means of

verification. I make this observation, lest the reader should also be

led to doubt, too hastily, without obtaining, or, at least, without

seeking for proof.

I now find, for example, in vol. i. of Napoleon’s Memoirs, dictated to

Count Montholon, so complete and satisfactory a confirmation of the

remark which I collected from the Emperor’s conversation at St.

Helena, that I cannot refrain from transcribing it.

The passage is as follows:—

“It was Napoleon’s desire to create anew the Italian Nation, and to

re-unite the Venetians, Milanese, Piedmontese, Genoese, Tuscans,

Parmesans, Modenese, Romans, Neapolitans, Sicilians, and Sardinians,

in one independent nation, bounded by the Alps and the Adriatic, the

Ionian, and the Mediterranean seas: such was the immortal trophy he

was raising to his glory! This great and powerful kingdom would have

been, by land, a check to the House of Austria; whilst, by sea, its

fleets, combined with those of Toulon, would have ruled the

Mediterranean, and protected the old course of trade to India, by the

Red Sea and Suez. Rome, the capital of this state, was the eternal

city; covered by the three barriers of the Alps, the Po, and the

Apennines; nearer than any other to the three great Islands. But

Napoleon had many obstacles to surmount. He said, at the Consultum of

Lyons, _It will take me twenty years to re-establish the Italian

Nation_.

“There were three impediments to this grand design; first, the

possessions of Foreign Powers in Italy; secondly, the influence of

locality; and, thirdly, the residence of the Popes at Rome.

“Scarcely ten years had elapsed, from the date of the _Consultum_ of

Lyons, before the first obstacle was entirely removed. Foreign Powers

no longer possessed any portion of Italy; which was entirely under the

immediate influence of the Emperor. The destruction of the Republic of

Venice, the deposition of the King of Sardinia and of the Grand Duke

of Tuscany, the annexation of Saint Peter’s patrimony to the Empire,

had set aside the second obstacle. As founders, who have to transform

several guns of small calibre into one forty-eight pounder, first

throw them all into the furnace to reduce them to a state of fusion,

so the small States had been united to Austria and France, that they

might be reduced to an elementary state, freed from their old

recollections and pretensions, and thus prepared for re-casting. The

Venetians having been annexed to the Austrian Monarchy, had for

several years experienced the bitterness of subjection to the Germans.

When these people should have been restored to an Italian Government,

they would have cared little whether their city was to be the capital

of Italy, or whether their government was to be more or less

aristocratic. A similar change would have taken place in Piedmont,

Genoa, and Rome, which had all been disorganized by the change of the

French Empire.

“There were now no Venetians, Piedmontese, or Tuscans: the inhabitants

of the whole Peninsula were only Italians. All was prepared for

forming the great Italian Nation. The Grand Duchy of Berg was vacant

for the dynasty which, for the time, occupied the throne of Naples.

The Emperor impatiently awaited the birth of a second son, to crown

him King of Italy; and to proclaim the independence of the beautiful

Peninsula, under the Regency of Prince Eugene.”

“All the South of Europe, therefore, would soon have been rendered

compact in point of locality, views, opinions, sentiments, and

interests. In this state of things, what would have been the weight of

all the nations of the north? What human efforts could have broken

through so strong a barrier?

“The concentration of the Germans must have been effected more

gradually; and therefore I had done no more than simplify their

monstrous complication. Not that they were unprepared for

concentralization; on the contrary, they were too well prepared for it,

and they might have blindly risen in re-action against us, before they

had comprehended our designs. How happens it that no German Prince has

yet formed a just notion of the spirit of his nation, and turned it to

good account? Certainly, if heaven had made me a Prince of Germany,

amidst the many critical events of our times, I should, infallibly, have

governed the thirty millions of Germans united; and, from what I know of

them, I think I may venture to affirm that, if they had once elected and

proclaimed me, they would not have forsaken me, and I should never have

been at St. Helena.”

Then, after some melancholy details and comparisons, he thus resumed:

“At all events, this concentration will be brought about, sooner or

later, by the very force of events. The impulse is given; and I think

that, since my fall and the destruction of my system, no grand

equilibrium can possibly be established in Europe, except by the

concentration and confederation of the principal nations. The sovereign

who, in the first great conflict, shall sincerely embrace the cause of

the people, will find himself at the head of all Europe, and may attempt

whatever he pleases.

“It will perhaps be asked why I did not suffer these ideas to transpire?

why I did not submit them to public discussion; since they would,

doubtless, have become popular, and popularity would have been an

immense re-inforcement to me? My answer is, that malevolence is ever

more active than good intention; that, at the present day, the power of

wit overrules good sense, and obscures at pleasure the most luminous

points; and that, to have submitted these important subjects to public

discussion would have been to consign them to the mercy of party-spirit,

passion, intrigue, and gossiping, while the infallible result would have

been discredit and opposition. I conceived, therefore, that secrecy was

the most advisable course. I surrounded myself with that halo of mystery

which pleases and interests the multitude; gives birth to speculations,

which occupy the public mind; and, finally, affords opportunities for

those sudden and brilliant disclosures, which exercise such important

influence. It was this very principle that accelerated my unfortunate

march to Moscow. Had I been more deliberate, I might have averted every

evil; but I could not delay and afford time for comment. With my career

already traced out, with my ideas formed for the future, it was

necessary that my movement and my success should seem, as it were,

supernatural.” The Emperor here adverted to the Russian expedition,

repeating many of the observations which I have already recorded

elsewhere. I now note down only what I conceive to be new.

“I will name another occasion,” said he, “on which accident was taken

for principle. I failed in my expedition against the Russians; and they,

therefore, consider themselves invincible. But can any thing be more

erroneous? Ask men of sense and reflection among them! Ask Alexander

himself, and let him recollect the opinions he entertained at the time!

Was I defeated by the efforts of the Russians? No! my failure must be

attributed to pure accident, to absolute fatality. First a capital was

burnt to the ground, in spite of its inhabitants and through foreign

intrigues, and in defiance of its inhabitants; then winter set in with

such unusual suddenness and severity that it was regarded as a kind of

phenomenon. To these disasters must be added a mass of false reports,

silly intrigues, treachery, stupidity, and, in short, many things that

will perhaps one day come to light, and which will excuse or justify the

two great errors I committed in diplomacy and war; namely, to have

undertaken such an enterprise, leaving on my flanks, which soon became

my rear, two cabinets of which I was not master, and two allied armies,

which, on the least check would become my enemies. But to come to a

conclusion, and to annul with a word every charge that can be brought

against me, I may say that this famous war, this bold enterprise, was

perfectly involuntary on my part. I did not wish to fight; neither did

Alexander;—but being once in presence, circumstances urged us on, and

fate accomplished the rest.”

After a few moments’ silence, and as if waking from a reverie, the

Emperor added:—“A Frenchman had in his hands the fate of the world! If

he had possessed judgment and spirit equal to the exalted situation in

which he was placed, if he had been a good Swede as he pretended to be,

he might have restored the glory and power of his adoptive country, have

retaken Finland, and arrived at St. Petersburgh before I reached Moscow.

But he was swayed by personal considerations, silly vanity, and all

sorts of mean passions. His head was turned, when he saw that he, an old

Jacobin, was courted and flattered by legitimates; when he found himself

holding political and friendly conferences face to face with an Emperor

of all the Russias, who took great pains to cajole him. It is affirmed

that hints were even thrown out to him of the possibility of his

obtaining the hand of one of the sisters of the Russian Emperor, by

divorcing his wife; and, in a letter addressed to him by a French

Prince, the writer remarked, with complacency, that Bearn was the cradle

of both their houses! _The house of Bernadotte_ forsooth!

“In his intoxication, he sacrificed both his new and his mother country,

his own glory, his true power, the cause of the people, and the welfare

of Europe! For this he will pay dearly! No sooner had he accomplished

all that was expected of him than he began to feel what awaited him. It

is said that he has repented of his conduct; but he has not yet expiated

it. He is now the only upstart sovereign in Europe. The Scandal cannot

remain unpunished; it would be too dangerous an example.”

THE EMPEROR HAS BUT LITTLE CONFIDENCE IN THE ISSUE OF

1815.—THEMISTOCLES.—IN THE CRISIS OF 1814, NAPOLEON HIMSELF

MOMENTARILY ENTERTAINED A THOUGHT OF RESTORING THE BOURBONS.—BARON

FAIN’S MANUSCRIPT OF 1814.—THE ABDICATION OF FONTAINEBLEAU, &C.

12th.—The Emperor, adverting to his return from the Island of Elba and

his second fall at Waterloo, made some remarkable observations on both

these subjects. “It is very certain,” said he, “that, during the events

of 1815, I relinquished the anticipation of ultimate success: I lost my

first confidence. Perhaps I found that I was wearing beyond the time of

life at which fortune usually proves favourable; or, perhaps, in my own

eyes, in my own imagination, the spell that had hung over my miraculous

career was broken;—but, at all events, I felt that something was

wanting. Kind Fortune no longer followed my footsteps, and took pleasure

in lavishing her smiles upon me; she was now succeeded by rigid Fate,

who took ample revenge for the few favours which I obtained, as it were,

by force. It is a remarkable fact that every advantage I obtained at

this period was immediately succeeded by a reverse.

“I marched through France, and arrived in the capital amidst the

enthusiasm and universal acclamations of the people; but no sooner had I

reached Paris than, by a sort of magic, and without any adequate motive,

all around suddenly shrank from me and grew cold.

“I had adduced plausible reasons for obtaining a sincere reconciliation

with Austria, whither I had despatched agents, more or less avowed.[8]

But Murat was there with his fatal enterprise. It was concluded, at

Vienna that he was acting under my orders; and, measuring me by their

own scale, they regarded my whole conduct as a complication of artifice,

and determined to overreach me by counter-intrigue.

Footnote 8:

Among others, Baron Stassard, in whose well known fidelity Napoleon

reposed such confidence, that he sent him to the Congress of Vienna,

to negotiate for the maintenance of the peace of Paris. But the Baron

was unfortunately prevented from proceeding farther than Lintz; the

most furious and inveterate in the Allied Cabinets having adopted the

precaution of securing the absolute prohibition of all communication

with Napoleon. It was, however, indirectly intimated to Baron

Stassard, that if, before the commencement of hostilities, the Emperor

chose to abdicate in favour of his son, Austria would accede to that

condition, provided Napoleon would surrender himself into the hands of

his father-in-law, who would again guarantee to him the sovereignty of

the Isle of Elba, or any analogous sovereignty.

“The opening of my campaign was well managed and proved most successful.

I should have surprised the enemy in detail; had not a deserter from

among our generals given him timely notice of my plans.

“I gained the brilliant victory of Ligni; but my lieutenant robbed me of

its fruits. Finally, I triumphed even at Waterloo, and was immediately

hurled into the abyss. Yet I must confess that all these strokes of fate

distressed me more than they surprised me. I felt the presentiment of an

unfortunate result. Not that this in any way influenced my

determinations and measures; but the foreboding certainly haunted my

mind.”

That such was really Napoleon’s state of feeling at the period here

alluded to is evident from the following anecdote, which is so very

remarkable that I cannot forbear presenting it to the reader. When on

the banks of the Sambre, the Emperor early one morning approached a

bivouac fire, accompanied only by his aide-de-camp on duty (General

C—--); some potatoes were boiling on the fire, and the Emperor asked for

one, and began to eat it. Then, with a meditative and somewhat

melancholy expression, he uttered the following broken sentences:—“After

all, it is good, it is endurable.... Man may live in any place, and in

any way.... The moment perhaps is not far distant.... Themistocles!...”

The aide-de-camp above mentioned, who himself related this circumstance

to me, since my return to Europe, observed that, had the Emperor been

successful, these words would have passed away without leaving any

impression on him; but that, after the catastrophe, and particularly

after reading the celebrated letter to the Prince Regent, he had been

struck with the recollection of the bivouac of the Sambre; and

Napoleon’s manner, tone, and expression, had since so haunted his mind,

that he could never banish the circumstance from his memory.

It is a mistake to suppose that Napoleon was on all occasions inspired

by that internal confidence which his acts and decisions seemed to

denote. When he quitted the Tuileries, in January 1814, to enter upon

his immortal but unfortunate campaign in the environs of Paris, his mind

was depressed by gloomy apprehensions:—and a circumstance that bears

evidence of his penetration and foresight is that, at the period in

question, he felt convinced of what the majority of those about him were

far from suspecting;—namely, that if he fell, it would be by the

Bourbons. This idea he communicated to a few of his particular friends,

who vainly endeavoured to rouse his confidence by representing that the

Bourbons were forgotten, that they were wholly unknown to the present

generation:—“There is the real danger,” was his invariable reply. Thus,

immediately after his eloquent and impressive harangue to the officers

of the national guard, in which among other things he said:—“You elected

me, I am your work, and it is for you to defend me;” and which he

concluded by presenting to them the Empress and the King of Rome,

saying, “I go to oppose the enemy, and I consign to your care all that I

hold most dear:”—immediately after delivering this address, when on the

point of quitting the Tuileries, he foresaw at that decisive moment the

treachery and perfidy that awaited him, and he resolved to secure the

person of him who proved to be the main-spring of the plot, by which his

overthrow was effected. He was prevented from executing his intention

only by representations, and it may even be said, offers of personal

responsibility, on the part of some of his Ministers, who assured him

that the individual suspected had more reason than any one else to dread

the return of the Bourbons. Napoleon yielded; at the same time

emphatically expressing fears that he might have cause to regret his

forbearance!...

The following circumstance, which is but little known, is important,

since it proves how much, in the height of the crisis. Napoleon’s

thoughts were directed towards the Bourbons. After the check sustained

at Brienne, the evacuation of Troyes, the forced retreat on the Seine,

and the degrading conditions which were transmitted from Chatillon, but

which were so generously rejected, the Emperor, who was closeted with

one of his friends, overpowered at sight of the miseries that were

impending on France, suddenly rose from his chair, exclaiming with

warmth:—“Perhaps I still possess the means of saving France.... What if

I were myself to recal the Bourbons! The Allies would then be compelled

to arrest their course, under pain of being overwhelmed with disgrace

and detected in their duplicity; under pain of being forced to

acknowledge that their designs were directed against our territory

rather than against my person. I should sacrifice all to the country. I

should become the mediator between the French people and the Bourbons. I

should oblige the latter to accede to the national laws, and to swear

fidelity to the existing compact: my glory and name would be a guarantee

to the French people. As for me, I have reigned long enough. My career

is filled with acts of glory; and this last will not be esteemed the

least. I shall rise the higher by descending thus far....” Then, after a

pause of some moments, he added:—“But can a repulsed dynasty ever

forgive?... Can it ever forget?... Can the Bourbons be trusted?... May

not Fox be right in his famous maxim respecting restorations?...”

Overcome by grief and anxiety, he threw himself on his couch, and was

shortly after roused to be made acquainted with the march of the flank

of Blucher’s corps, on which he had for some time been secretly keeping

watch. He rose to put into action that new spring of resources, energy,

and glory, which will for ever consecrate the names of Champ-Aubert,

Montmirail, Chateau-Thierry, Vaux-Champ, Nangis, Montereau, Craon, &c.

These marvellous successes dismayed Alexander and the English, and

suggested to them the expediency of treating: they might indeed have

entirely changed the face of affairs, had not Napoleon’s designs been

thwarted by accidents beyond the reach of human calculation. For

example, the important orders which did not reach the Viceroy, the

defection of Murat, the indolence and negligence of certain Chiefs, and

finally, even the successful movements of the French, which, by

separating the Emperor of Austria from the other Allied Sovereigns, left

the latter entirely free to plan the abdication of Fontainebleau, an

event which will ever be celebrated in the history of our destiny and

our moral character.

Philosophic thinkers, painters of the human heart, turn your eyes to

Fontainebleau, and contemplate the fall of the greatest of monarchs!

Observe how the retinue by which the unfortunate hero was

surrounded,—those whom he had loaded with favours, honours, and

riches,—at the first frown of fortune, forsook, betrayed, and even

sought to insult him!... Mark how the first among them in rank, in

favour, in confidence—he whom the great Prince had vainly sought to

inspire with exalted sentiment, by treating him as his companion and his

friend,—mark how this man degraded himself to the level of the Mameluke,

whose native manners rendered him perhaps more excusable, and who

thought it perfectly natural to forsake his fallen master.

Memoirs of the life, exile, and conversations of the Emperor Napoleon. (Vol. IV) · 第 9 / 40 段