Another ride, but requiring more accuracy in time-keeping, is that

known as "cross bows," and this is one of the prettiest of all, for the

whole of the lawn is occupied, and when done by practised riders and

rather quickly, it is charming to watch and most fascinating to do.

Again four riders are required, and they mount in line. The five clubs

are in the same position as for Centre Circles. In this ride, however,

there are two leaders, No. 1 being followed by rider No. 3, and No. 2

by rider No. 4. As in Figure 3, leader No. 1 will follow the _dotted_

lines, while leader No. 2 will go over the heavy lines indicated; rider

No. 3 following leader No. 1, and rider No. 4 following leader No. 2.

It is imperative that the original distances be kept exactly, or in

crossing at points F and G there will surely be a collision otherwise.

This being a complicated ride to do well, it will require practice,

but I think that by following the lines of the diagram there will be

no difficulty in learning it. Leader No. 1 (having led the ride all

round the lawn) on reaching club B will ride straight across to club

D, keeping to the right of centre club A, and turning round club D

will then ride straight back to club B again, followed by rider 3. At

the same time leader 2, in starting the ride, will turn short to her

left, going outside club E, where she begins the "cross bow," by riding

straight across the lawn to club C. Leaders 1 and 2 should reach clubs

D and E simultaneously and turn them together, and leader No. 1 making

her curve closer to the club than No. 2, should pass the point F on

the diagram just as No. 2 reaches it on her way to club C. In this

way rider 3 will pass point F immediately after No. 2, and rider 4,

following No. 2 will pass F a second after No. 3. Reaching B, leader

1 will now make the double curve round clubs B and E, as shown, and

leader 2 will do the same between C and D, and on reaching B and C

again, they will do once more the "cross bow" as described, only this

time leader 1 will pass over point G first, and leader 2 will follow,

as was done before in passing F. The greatest exactitude should be

kept in crossing each other, for not only does safety demand it, but

when done with indecision and over zig-zag lines, the figure loses

its beauty, and like all the other rides, becomes difficult to follow.

It is fatal to any ride to do it in a wavering way, which will impress

people with the idea that you are not sure of it yourself. The best

riders I have ever seen doing these figures, have always emphasized

the straight lines, thus making their curves seem more sweeping by

contrast, and adding greatly to the effect.

Another thing figure riders invariably advocate, is to ride very high,

and certainly once any one has ridden with both handle-bars and seat

well up, they never can go back to the lower saddle. Some people indeed

say it is more difficult to ride high, but I do not think when you

have become used to it, that you will find it so. Of all things to be

avoided I would mention the mistake of putting up the handle bars,

without heightening the saddle. I heard this position once described

as that of "begging," and it has always seemed to me irresistibly

ludicrous ever since. If you will watch the ankle play of two riders,

one with the saddle high and the other with it low, you will not

hesitate an instant as to which position is preferable.

There is no limit to the number of rides you can do. Almost any book

of army drills, especially for cavalry, will give you ideas for a

hundred new figures, and you can vary these, not the least amusing part

being in creating, adapting and arranging figures to add to the old

repertoire.

[Illustration: _Fig. IV_

_American Circle ride._]

But to go back to the well-known figures, with which one is never

tired, and which always hold their own as to prettiness.

Let us continue with the "American Circle Ride." This can be ridden by

any number and is a great favourite when introduced at garden-parties.

With eight riders, three rows of three clubs each are needed, and these

rows should be about three bicycle lengths from each other, while two

bicycle lengths should separate the clubs in the rows. All the riders

start in a line. On reaching line B, leader 1 goes to the left of Club

3, and No. 2 will keep to its right so that they ride side by side,

divided by the clubs. The others divide in the same way and at the

bottom they will turn to their respective sides, leader No. 1 following

line A, and leader No. 2 line C. To begin with, they will _both_ do the

circles to the left as drawn down line C, and meeting at the top they

again come down the centre on either side of Clubs B, side by side. The

second time they both do the ride as shewn through line A, doing the

middle club the reverse way to the first and last, and for the third

round, reverting to the ride as shown through Clubs C, only of course,

where those following leader 2 turn to the left, those following No.

1 will turn and circle to the right. In coming down the centre the

leaders can join hands, and the others naturally will do the same,

but this is generally called by another name, and is often worked as

another figure.

Speaking of circling to left and right brings up another very pretty

figure for a number of riders. Set your Clubs as for "Centre Circles"

and begin (all following one leader) by circling Club B, going right

round it as shown in Figure 2, and going on to E, then D, and finally

to C, then describe the double curve as shown in 'cross bows' (between

Clubs B and E of Figure 3) only ride straight round Club D--Figure 2.

The Club marked E in the former, is D in Figure 2. Having gone round

Club D, go on to Club E, and circle that to the right, and then on to

B, and so circle every club as you come to it. Having circled D again,

to finish the ride, go to Club C passing outside it, and then straight

round the lawn. This can be done by two parties at the same time, one

starting from Club B, the other from Club D, and each doing the same

thing at opposite corner Clubs throughout the ride. I have seen as many

as twenty riding in this figure together.

The "Maypole" is of course very pretty and when care is taken to ensure

the riders having ribbons to match the colour they wear, or in which

they have decked their bicycles, it is lovely. It is simple to execute,

too, and can be done by almost any number, though I think eight or

ten quite enough. Half the riders will go to the left, the other half

to the right. Supposing the pole to be in the centre of the lawn, the

four who are going to the right will mount at the four points of the

compass, holding their ribbons high above them, in their right hands.

The other four will mount, a little farther from the pole, as they will

make a larger circle to begin with, and hold their ribbons in their

left hands as they go to the left. In order to weave a regular pattern,

those going to the left and right must pass each other in and out, as

they meet. It is easier to learn the ride if Clubs are put up, where

the riders should meet and pass each other, as they go in and out.

There should be an even number of riders and a club for each. If eight

were riding, four would pass the first club on the left and the next

on their right, and so on, while the other half would pass their first

Club on the right and the second club to the left. It will be found

easier to keep your balance if you hold your arm high, and there is no

doubt that it looks better.

The idea of passing clubs first on the right and then on the left

alternately has been the foundation of a number of rides. A pretty

sight is to have a circle of clubs, with a rider to each. One rider

will begin by going outside the circle, from inside, and passing

between the clubs at the same time that the next rider will pass from

outside into the circle, and so picking their way to the left of one

club and the right of the next, all the way round the ring. However,

all depends on the riders passing the clubs at the same moment on their

several ways, and as this requires no little practice to do well, one

rarely sees this figure to advantage.

Fancy Figure Riding may sound tame to those who have never tried it,

but I venture to think that those who once take to it will very quickly

become fascinated, and my own belief is, that as figures become better

known, and more hostesses introduce them at their gatherings, this

branch of cycling will increase in popularity.

Evelyn Van Wart.

[Illustration: _J. Weston and Son_ _Folkestone._

_MISS MAUD MARSHALL._

(_Figure B. Overhand Service._)]

LAWN-TENNIS.

Lawn-tennis, though still in its youth, may with some justice lay claim

through its prototypes, Longue paume, Pallone, Tennis, etc., to an

illustrious ancestry; the connection between the modern and the older

games being sufficient to establish a relationship. It is not necessary

here to trace this connection step by step, beginning perchance with

the game which Louis X. of France played in the forest of Vincennes

to the championship fought out on the Wimbledon Club grounds in 1897.

The greater part of such a history would of necessity belong to tennis

proper, which, as we know, has been a popular English game for many

ages. So in the 15th century we hear of a tennis court at Windsor

Castle, and the present one at Hampton Court was originally built

by Henry VIII., in whose reign it was that Sir Thomas More, in his

"Utopia," stigmatised tennis along with "dice, cards, tables, bowls

and quoits" as "a naughty and unlawful game."

The first authentic record we have of lawn-tennis as we know it dates

back no further than 1874, when Major Wingfield patented a certain

pastime by him named "Sphairistike." It was not I believe claimed to

be an invention, but merely an adaptation of a sport almost as old as

the world itself. A sub-committee of the Marylebone Cricket Club was

asked in 1875 to bring order into chaos, everyone for the twelve months

of its existence having chosen to play "Sphairistike," or lawn-tennis,

as it was now called, as it best pleased them. A code was drawn up,

issued and quickly superseded, but at least there was a recognised

length and breadth of court and height of net, which prior to this,

as I have said, depended entirely upon the taste of the players. In

1875 lawn-tennis took up its headquarters at Wimbledon, being admitted

to form part of the "All England Croquet Club" there. The game was

introduced at Prince's Club in the same year. In 1876 tennis scoring

was adopted, and it was the general opinion that lawn-tennis had

come to stay. In the following year the "All England Croquet Club"

determined to include the name of the new game in its title, and it

became known as the "All England Croquet and Lawn-Tennis Club." In

another twelve or eighteen months the visitor had pushed the host

out of house and home, the club becoming henceforth headquarters of

lawn-tennis alone.

It was in the July of 1877 that the first lawn-tennis championship

meeting was held at Wimbledon, a silver challenge cup being offered for

competition by the proprietors of _The Field_. There were twenty-two

entries, Mr. Spencer-Gore carrying off the championship and the

all-comers prizes. The principal results of the first tournament was to

show up a serious defect, viz.: the great preponderance of games won

by the server against those gained by the striker-out; the proportion

being about five to three. This defect was remedied in 1878 by bringing

the service line four feet nearer the net, from twenty-six feet to

twenty-two feet. The net at the same time was lowered from five feet

at the posts to four feet nine inches, and from three feet three

inches at the centre to three feet. In 1879 two more championships

were instituted, those of the Oxford University Lawn-Tennis Club, and

of Ireland. The latter meeting was of particular importance to lady

players, owing to the fact that it was their first competition ground.

This pioneer of women's lawn-tennis championships was carried off

by Miss M. Langrishe, who was also successful in securing the Irish

prize in 1883 and 1886. The first occasion on which ladies competed

at Wimbledon was in the year 1884, when Miss M. Watson secured the

All England Championship, to which she joined the double victory of

Ireland, where she defeated Miss M. Langrishe.

In 1885 the manager of the Buxton Tournament instituted a ladies'

double championship, carried off by Mrs. Watts and Miss Bracewell. The

championship of England and Ireland was again held by Miss M. Watson.

It was during this year that Miss L. Dod first began to be known in

the front ranks of lady players, though it was not until 1887 that she

held the championship of England and Ireland, since when she has held

the English Championship four times. In 1886 Miss Bingley, now Mrs.

Hillyard, shot to the fore, defeating Miss Watson at Wimbledon. Her

victory, though coming as something of a surprise, was magnificently

earned, her extreme accuracy and power creating a good deal of

enthusiasm.

The next epoch of importance in ladies' tennis--and the last possible

variation of the game--was the institution, in 1888, of the "All

England Mixed Doubles Championship," won by Mr. E. Renshaw and Mrs.

Hillyard. During the same year the "Lawn-Tennis Association" came

into existence, the want having for long been felt of one recognised

authority, under whose rules all championship matches should be played.

In 1890, the Association made important alterations in some of the

previously recognised laws. The change of sides under the new _regime_

was fixed at the end of the first, third and every alternate game of

the set, instead of at the end of each game. Bisques were abolished,

and the quarter system of receiving odds was instituted, more of which

hereafter. Subsequently the distance of the service line from the net

was fixed at 21-ft., and the height of the net at 3-ft. 6-in. at the

posts, and 3-ft. at the centre.

The strides made in lawn-tennis since its first institution as a

game are remarkable indeed, when we consider that the first and only

tournament in the land was held in 1877, and that in 1897, the list

of tournament dates issued by the Lawn-Tennis Association comprised

sixty-two fixtures in the United Kingdom, and seven on the Continent.

I must not forget to add that in 1885, the first Covered Court

Championship was held, Mr. Lawford carrying off the prize. The Ladies'

Covered Court Championship was not inaugurated till 1890, when Miss

Jacks secured the coveted title, Miss Austin being the holder in 1897.

The Ladies' Championship of 1897, was very closely contested, Mrs.

Hillyard playing Miss C. Cooper (the holder). The first set was won

by the latter lady, but owing to the severity of Mrs. Hillyard's

returns, Miss Cooper was unable to maintain her advantage and was

finally beaten, the sets standing at 5-7, 7-5, 6-2. Mrs. Hillyard

also carried off the Ladies' Singles, defeating Mrs. Pickering by two

sets to love--6-2, 7-5. The Irish Championship was also gained by the

Wimbledon victor, who beat the Irish candidate, Miss Dyas, by two sets

to one--7-5, 2-6, 6-3,--thus proving herself the best lady player of

the year.

With many lawn-tennis players the choice of a court is unfortunately

apt to exemplify the old saying that "the coat must be cut according

to the cloth," though in these days of plenty when every town in the

United Kingdom possesses at least one lawn-tennis club, it should

not be so difficult to secure the best advantages for practice. It is

a different matter of course with a private court, the formation of

which may, for many reasons be a difficult task; though the advantages

of a ground upon the premises is too obvious to need demonstration.

In the first place the court should be chosen lengthways from N. to

S., to provide for obtaining the best possible light; secondly, if the

process of levelling cannot be indulged in, let the ground chosen be at

least as level as possible; and thirdly, let my foregoing remark apply

equally to drainage. The absence of any obstacles such as overhanging

branches, or the too close proximity of shrubs, is also to be carefully

thought of, and avoided. An ample margin all round being allowed

for, according to the first "recommendation" in the handbook of the

Lawn-Tennis Association. "There should be, if possible, a clear margin

of at least 12-ft. on each side, and 21-ft. at each end of the court."

The preparation of the court should be, as far as possible, the

player's individual care. Even when the turf is coarse or weed grown

to begin with, the careful application of a mowing machine, a roller

and a knife, will soon work wonders. Should plantains prevail, cut them

off close to the soil, whenever they appear--I have known a promising

court spoilt by an attempt to dig these weeds out, root and all, with

the result that when play commenced, the balls shot at obtuse and

unexpected angles. The mowing machine and the roller must be kept in

constant use, the former should do its work every day if necessary,

after the grass has finished growing, during the process once a week

will be sufficient--this, perhaps, is more applicable when grass has

been _sown_. Old turf should never be allowed to look even slightly

ragged. The energetic use of a roller helps the grass roots to spread

out and obtain the mastery over the decapitated weeds.

I quote from the Lawn-Tennis Association handbook for the dimensions of

the court.

_Law 1._ "For the single-handed game, the court is 27-ft. in

width, and 78-ft. in length. It is divided across the middle

with a net, the ends of which are attached to two posts,

which stand 3-ft. outside the court on each side. The height

of the net is 3-ft. 6-in. at the posts, and 3-ft. at the

centre. At each end of the court, parallel with the net, and

at a distance of 39-ft. from it, are drawn the _base-lines_,

the extremities of which are connected by the _side-lines_.

Half-way between the side-lines and parallel with them, is

drawn the _half-court-line_, dividing the space on each

side of the net into two equal parts, and called the _right

and left courts_. On each side of the net, at a distance

of 21-ft. from it, and parallel with it, are drawn the

_service-lines_."

[Illustration: _Single Court._

_78 feet._]

[Illustration: _Double Court._]

When a double court is required, the base-lines must be prolonged 4-ft.

6-in. in each direction, when by joining the four new points, the

side-lines of a double court are obtained; it will not now be necessary

to prolong the inner side-lines further than the service lines.

The measuring of a court is always apt to be tedious work, but with a

little method, a measuring tape, a reel of stout string, some small

wooden pegs and a fair supply of patience, the difficulties are soon

overcome. The first necessity is to fix the posts in position--I have

always found it simplified matters to represent the net by a piece

of string from post to post--then measure off a distance of 3-ft.

from each, inwards of course. From the point now obtained, measure

the side-lines, 78-ft. which gives us 39-ft. each way from the posts.

From the side-lines now measure 4-1/2-ft. inwards, and 21-ft. each

way from the net string for the service-lines. It now only remains

for these lines to be joined along their base by four others running

parallel with the net, two on each side of it, respectively termed the

base-lines and the service-lines. Half-way between the service-lines

and parallel with the side-lines, a line is next drawn to form the

half-court-line, which accomplishes the task. Each point as it is

measured should be marked off with a peg; then when all the dimensions

are taken, a piece of string should be pulled taut from peg to peg,

serving as guide to the marker. As a last word on the subject, I may

say that I have never heard a low price in markers, nets, posts, or

indeed in any implement of the game, recommended as being really

economical.

As to balls they can be obtained in many makes, but "Ayre's

Championship" stand first in the list of excellence. By the laws of

the Lawn Tennis Association the weight of a ball shall be not less

than 1-1/8-oz., or more than 2-oz. In 1877, the year of the first

Championship, the minimum weight was 1-1/4-oz., and the maximum

1-1/2-oz.

_The Racket._ On the fortunate choice of a racket, depends literally at

least half the success or failure of any battle fought with it. Writing

of rackets, Mr. C. A. Heathcote says: "The essential points are--a good

hoop, free from knots, with a well-marked and continuous grain, plain

wooden handle, round or slightly octagonal, fitting the hand of the

player, attached to the middle piece without any perceptible interval,

and good strong gut."[7] It is an essential point that the racket

should not be too heavy; on the other hand an over-light racket is far

from desirable, except perhaps for a volleying game. From 12 to 13-oz.

is usually considered a good weight range for a lady's racket, though I

have frequently met with ladies who never touched anything under 14-oz.

Indeed, in a matter of this sort, the choice must rest very much with

the player herself, who will soon find from experience what weight

suits her best. And so long as she confines her selection to the first

makes, she cannot go very far wrong.

_Scoring._ The only satisfactory manner in which lawn-tennis scoring

can be dealt with on paper, is by quoting once more from the laws of

the Lawn-Tennis Association, thus:

_Law 21._ On either player winning his first stroke, the score

is called 15 for that player, on either player winning his

second stroke, the score is called 30 for that player; on

either player winning his third stroke, the score is called

40 for that player; and the fourth stroke won by either

player is scored game for that player, except as below:

If both players have won three strokes, the score is called

deuce, and the next stroke won by either player is called

advantage for that player. If the same player win the next

stroke, he wins the game; if he lose the next stroke the score

is again called deuce, and so on until either player win the

two strokes immediately following the score at deuce, when the

game is scored for that player.

_Law 22._ The player who first wins six games wins a set,

except as below:

If both players win five games, the score is called games-all,

and the next game won by either player is scored advantage-game

for that player. If the same player win the next game, he wins

the set; if he lose the next game, the score is again called

games-all; and so on until either player wins the two games

immediately following the score of games-all, when he wins the

set.

_Note._ Players may agree not to play advantage sets, but to

decide the set by one game after arriving at the score of

games-all.

_Odds._ In the year 1888, bisques--which had been borrowed from

tennis--were abolished. A bisque is one stroke which may be claimed at

any time during a set. The principal disadvantage of this system lay in

the difficulty of employing it judiciously, thereby causing a certain

mental strain, possibly injurious to the player's form. The bisque gave

place to the "quarter" and the "perfect" systems, which in their turn

were superseded by the "sixth system" in 1894, now in universal use.

Roughly, the sixth system of handicapping is to receive odds of one,

two, three, four, or five strokes in every six games of a set; each

given stroke being respectively described as one-sixth, two-sixths,

three-sixths, four-sixths, five-sixths, fifteen. For complete and

detailed tables of the system of handicapping, the reader is referred

to the handbook of the Lawn-Tennis Association.

_On the subject of suitable clothing_ much might be written. For

any form of outdoor exercise, the two chief requisites of costume

are warmth and lightness. A thin flannel shirt is more useful than

anything, worn with a _short_ light skirt. I have seen such terrible

and distressing results arise from the wearing of skirts which,

though short in front, dropped at the back that I cannot too strongly

emphasise the need for _all-round_ shortness; loss of temper and

dignity being among the lesser evils accruing from neglect of this

particular. The shoes worn should be strong and serviceable,

usefulness never being allowed to give way to the merely ornamental;

but now-a-days it is an easy matter to combine the two qualities. For

play in damp weather it is permissible to wear shoes with a leather

sole into which short nails, known as steel points, are fitted. These

are allowed on all grounds. In the matter of hats a straw sailor with

a widish brim is the most workmanlike form of head gear possible. It

is perhaps scarcely necessary to add that perfect looseness of every

garment is a _sine quâ non_ for the freedom of movement necessary in

lawn-tennis.

[Illustration: _Figure A._

_UNDER-HAND SERVICE._]

The Sportswoman's Library, Vol. 2 of 2 · 第 11 / 15 段