CHICAGO, ILL.

_To the Editor._—Why is it that Western people are so hasty to go daft

over the doings Down East, yet are so slow to recognize and to encourage

meritorious home enterprises? Quite recently, for instance, Chicago and

other Western cities have been all agog over the sale of certain

arteffects of a New-York lady, the widow Morgan, a relict of undoubted

taste, and possessing abundant means wherewith to gratify that taste.

Thousands of dollars went out of the West to purchase certain articles

of the Morgan collection at the recent sale in New York. A wealthy

pork-packer who lives near my house, brought back from the Morgan sale

two “rare pieces of virtue,” as he terms them: one was a cut-glass

potato-salad dish, manufactured in the third century by Ptolomy Dago, a

Spanish stone-cutter of wonderful ingenuity; the other was a superb

oil-painting representing mountaineer life in Holland, and painted by

Beethoven, the famous Italian sculptor. These “articles of virtue” could

not have cost less than twenty thousand dollars. But why go East for

these works of art? I understand that a great art-sale is about to take

place on the West Side; that the rare and costly collection of one of

our wealthiest soap-manufacturers, recently deceased, is about to be

disposed of at auction. Why are the papers, which are so ready to

advertise Eastern art-sales, silent now touching this home enterprise?

Why is our public, ever on the alert to blow in good money for Yankee

notions, so slow to patronize this West-Side slaughter of genuine

rarities? I think Chicago ought to be ashamed of herself; but here is an

excellent opportunity for her to redeem her reputation.

Yours, etc.,

SILAS G. HARDCASTLE.

_An Old Feud._

Indirectly we learn that Col. Hiram Atkins, chairman of the Vermont

Democratic Committee, thinks he has been unfairly dealt with by “The

Daily News.” He complains that the quotations which we gave as coming

from his paper, “The Montpelier Argus and Patriot,” were never printed

in his paper at all: he declares that he never announced that “Squire

Eastman’s tumor has cast a gloom over our little village,” or that “Mrs.

Mehitabel Ranney laid an egg on our table last week,” etc. It is

possible that we have done Col. Atkins an injustice; if so, the

injustice was done unintentionally; and we, lamenting it, do hereby

crave pardon therefor. Col. Atkins is a jovial, enterprising, fair, and

bright man: he is incapable of a mean action. We wish him a big run of

sap every spring, and a powerful harvest of beech-nuts next Michaelmas.

As to the items about Squire Eastman’s tumor, Mrs. Mehitabel Ranney’s

eggs, etc., which we printed, and credited to “The Montpelier Argus and

Patriot,” we received them from Senator Edmunds, with the remark that he

had found them in Atkins’s paper. Edmunds told us that Atkins was a

“fat, pussy man, that sweat twelve months in the year, and wore out two

paper collars every day:” he said that Atkins had pursued him for years,

maliciously and relentlessly, there being no species of base piracy to

which Atkins would not willingly stoop.

Atkins’s demoniacal animosity was incurred, so Edmunds avers, many years

ago, when the two were attending the academy at Rutland. Edmunds, it

appears, was in the senior class when Atkins entered the academy as a

freshman.

At that time the prettiest girl in the school was a Miss Joyful

Higginson, the only daughter of Squire Nathan Higginson of Bennington.

She had a trim figure, black eyes, curly hair, and red cheeks; and when

she got rigged out in one of her new gingham gowns on a Sunday morning,

she was, to use a phrase common in those times, “prettier than a yoke of

father’s steers.” To this Miss Joyful did Edmunds and Atkins pay ardent

but respectful homage, sending her lumps of maple-sugar, and packages of

rose-lozenges, taking her coasting and to picnics on a Saturday, and

showing her, in short, delicate attentions of that nature which seldom

fail to touch the maidenly heart. The fact, however, that Edmunds was

the older of the twain, that he had impressive side-whiskers, and that

he sang a delicious bass in the academy-choir, seems to have made him

more acceptable to Miss Joyful than any of the other young beaux were:

at any rate, Miss Joyful went sliding down hill with Edmunds oftener

than with anybody else, and his gifts of pippins, maple-sugar, lozenges,

nosegays, and the like, appeared to go to the spot which the tokens of

other beaux failed to reach.

The preference which Miss Joyful manifested for young Edmunds set Atkins

into a frenzy of jealous rage; and one night he threw his Livy upon the

floor, trampled upon his Andrew’s Latin Lexicon, and delivered himself

of this volcanic eruption of long-pent-up wrath: “Gol darn that

bewhiskered crittur! I’ll git even with him if I hev ter live ter be ez

old ez Methuselah! With that tarnation bass voice o’ his’n, as hard as

Pharaoh’s heart, and them whiskers the color o’ soft-soap, he hez cut

the rest on us clean out o’ our swaths. It may take an all-fired long

time to do it, but I’m goin’ to, by gosh, knock him higher’n a

meetin’-house steeple afore I git thru’ with him!”

This malignant threat was uttered fifty-eight years ago; and ever since

then, so Senator Edmunds tells us, Hiram Atkins has had but one grand

end in view,—the annihilation of George F. Edmunds. The episode of Miss

Joyful Higginson was simply one of the pretty idyls of youth. In 1838

Joyful married Leander Merrick, the popular young man who drove the

stage for a great many years between Brattleboro and Townsend.

_A Hegira Threatened._

There was a great stir in Chicago yesterday, and it was all on account

of the remarkable speech which Mr. Gladstone delivered in the British

House of Commons Thursday afternoon. No sooner was the independence of

Ireland assured, than the leaders of the Irish party in Chicago began

making preparations to return to the beloved Emerald Isle beyond the

sea. The news that these distinguished gentlemen contemplated departure

from scenes which they had graced with their presence for many years,

spread like a wildfire, and produced a sensation that can be described

only by the adjective prodigious. Bands of music paraded the principal

streets, discoursing a _repertoire_ made up of such inspired gems as

“Wearing of the Green,” “St. Patrick’s Day in the Morning,” and

“Croppies, Lie Down.”

Col. John F. Finerty, ex-member of Congress, and editor of our esteemed

contemporary, “The Citizen,” spent most of the day in his private

apartments, packing his valise, and disposing of the personal effects he

did not wish to take back to Ireland with him. “I shall leave for home

at once,” he said. “This country has become effete. It is subservient to

British gold, and has no longer any appreciation of personal honesty and

individual merit. Now that Ireland is to be an independent nation, it is

my purpose to return to her venerated soil, and to claim the titles and

estates which properly descend to me from a long line of lordly

ancestors. You may not be aware of it,—for with unflinching assiduity I

have concealed the fact,—but I am the thirty-eighth Lord of Tipperary;

and I am about to lay claim to the magnificent estates at

Ballyclerahan.”

Mr. John F. Scanlan said he had made arrangements for a passage on the

steamship “Aurania,” which would sail from New York early in May. “Our

triumph,” said he, “has been long delayed; but, Heaven be praised, it

has come at last! When once I have set foot on my native soil, you will

hear no more of John F. Scanlan; but Baron Ballingarry will dawn upon

Europe as one of the peerage of Ireland. Ballingarry, you must

understand, is a charmingly romantic estate in Munster County, twelve

miles north of Kilmeedy, fifteen miles south of Rathkeale, and twenty

miles west of Beuree. Upon a gentle elevation stands the baronial castle

which my forefathers erected during the historic reign of Brian

Boroihuee, and it is of this ancestral domain that I propose to possess

myself. I hear that a St.-Louis man, known as John D. Finney, claims to

be the heir-apparent to this baronetcy; but I shall show him that I can

handle a blackthorn quite as nimbly as the best of bogtrotters.”

Mr. J. J. Fitzgibbon said he was the Duke of Ballaghadereen, a beautiful

estate in the county of Mayo. It was his ambition to spend his declining

years in enjoyment of those lordly pleasures of which he had long been

deprived, but which now were about to be restored to him by the efforts

of Mr. Gladstone, the British premier.

Mr. William McClure claimed to be the long-missing heir to the earldom

of Armagh, with a moss-covered castle, and a dreamy expanse of peat-bog,

awaiting him at Loughall, one of the most picturesque spots in all

Ireland. He said he was making preparations to return to his native

land, and to claim every thing in sight.

The Hon. Patrick Sanders admitted, that, having wound up an active but

brief American career, he was getting ready to start back to Ireland,

where he meant to lay claim to the dukedom of Dripsey, in county Cork,

only a few miles south of the famous Blarneystone. “Such is my

self-abnegation,” said he, “that, if I perceived any desire on the part

of the Chicago people to retain me, I would cheerfully abandon every

claim to the Irish peerage which awaits me, and would devote myself to

the service of humanity in this city. But there is a lack of interest in

me hereabouts; and I shall therefore proceed shortly to the country

where, I am sure, my ability and my philanthropy will be appreciated.

The evening of my life shall be devoted to teaching the simple tenantry

of my ducal estates the sward-dance of our ancestors: and it is barely

possible that I shall put in operation a scheme I have long

contemplated; namely, the colonization of Dripsey with Italian

emigrants.”

It was learned, either from the gentlemen themselves, or from equally

reliable authorities, that the following distinguished citizens of

Chicago were on the eve of departure to the sod which they venerate as

their common mother:—

Michael Hannigan, claimant to the titles and estates of Denis, sixteenth

Duke of Stradbally, in the county Leinster.

Thomas E. Moran, heir-presumptive to the earldom of Knockcroghery, in

the county Roscommon, including the extensive peat-privileges at

Athleague.

John M. Dunphy, Baron Gortaroo, with the ancestral castle in county

Cork, overlooking Youghal Bay, near Knockadoon Head.

Sam Steele (formerly Welsh, but now Irish), claimant to the dukedom of

Londonderry, said to have been conquered in the thirteenth century by

the Welsh invader, Llewellyn Llnllth.

Michael W. Ryan, Lord Malin More, with a castle on the western coast of

county Donegal, enjoying fine privileges for conger eel and finnan

haddie fisheries.

Richard Pendergast, heir-apparent to the earldom of Belgooly, in county

Cork, twelve miles south of Templemichael.

Edward J. McPhelim, said to be the long-lost heir to the baronetcy of

Kilcullen, enjoying a magnificent ancestral castle on lake Liffey, in

county Kildare, within five minutes’ walk of the famous rocky road to

Dublin.

Thomas O’Neill (a lineal descendant of the great Hugh O’Neill), Duke of

Coleraine, claiming the magnificent estates near Lough Foyle, in

Londonderry.

Timothy D’Arcy, Baron Knock, with a grand old castle of mediæval

architecture on the river Shannon, one of the most beautiful estates in

the county Clare.

James Sullivan, Duke of Tyrone, claiming the old manor and estate at

Beltrim, yielding enormous rents.

Alexander Kirkland claims the dukedom of Kerry, which involves large and

valuable estates in the Kenmare-river and Bantry-bay districts; but

Kirkland’s claim is disputed by Vincent B. Kelly, who alleges that _he

himself_ is the lawful duke, and that Kirkland is simply a Scotch

interloper, who hails from the Frith of Forth, and who is known at home

as the Laird o’ Killiekrankie.

There is a rumor that Joseph Medill becomes, by the Gladstone act, sole

heir to that magnificent riparian privilege known as the Giants’

Causeway in Antrim; but it is doubtful whether that distinguished

gentleman will, for this giant legacy, relinquish the large interests he

has acquired in the country of his adoption.

_A Spanish Romance._

There is not an iota of truth in “The Philadelphia News” rumor that Miss

Kate Field is about to be married to a Western journalist. Miss Field

will never wed; and the secret of her celibacy is to be found in a

singularly sad and romantic tale which has never yet, we think, been put

in print.

Some years ago Miss Field made a visit to Spain with a view to

acquainting herself with certain old Castilian legends which she desired

to make literary use of. She took with her many letters of introduction

to Spanish grandees, among them a letter to Marshal Serrano. This

wealthy and influential nobleman received her most cordially, and

entertained her at his castle in Madrid for several weeks; his wife, a

sister of the Comte de Paris (now deceased), being particularly charmed

by the vigor of Miss Field’s intellect, and the insinuating grace of her

manners. It happened, that, during her stay at Serrano Castle, the

beautiful young American met, among other Spanish noblemen, the young

Alvaredo Lopez y Jesus de Ratz, one of the wealthiest, handsomest, and

bravest scions of Spanish royalty. He was a hidalgo of the thirty-second

magnitude, heir-apparent to the dukedom of Aragon, and, what was

considered better than all else, he possessed large political influence,

and stood high in the favor of the dominant party. Alvaredo Lopez de

Ratz fell a willing victim to the personal and intellectual charms of

the fascinating American girl; and with that precipitancy peculiar to

the impassioned sons of stately old Spain, he avowed his love at the

second meeting. Somewhat startled by the suddenness of his fervid

declaration, though not insensible to his exceeding eligibility, Miss

Field coyly employed those evasive, Fabian arts which so admirably

beseem her sex, and which render a beautiful girl all the more beautiful

in the opinion of mankind. So, therefore, Alvaredo set himself bravely

to the task of melting the marble heart of the proud American at whose

imperious feet he had incontinently cast down his heart, his titles, his

hopes, his all. Day after day he weaved sonnets to her eyes and hair, or

pursued her with sighings and avowals: night after night he lingered

beneath her window, blending his rich baritone voice in amorous

serenades with the throbbing tones of his mandolin or lute.

One day, Miss Field, accompanied by the young Alvaredo Lopez de Ratz,

went to the amphitheatre to witness a bull-fight, the same being a

celebration of the feast of St. Isadore. When they reached the place,

they found that their seats were on the other side of the amphitheatre;

and to save time, they thought to cut across the arena, the combat not

yet having begun. Scarcely, however, had they reached the centre of the

arena, when, by some fatal blunder, the door to the bull-pen was thrown

open, and out rushed a monstrous Andalusian bull, lashing his tail

wildly, pawing the earth, and bellowing fiercely.

“Suave mio! suave mio!” (“Save me! save me!”) cried Miss Field, in tones

that would have wrung the most callous heart.

“Carissima mia,” answered Alvaredo Lopez de Ratz, “te suavo spezza!”

(“Dearest, I will save thee!”)

Then, drawing his stiletto, the brave young lover threw himself between

the infuriated bull and the red parasol which Miss Field had unfurled,

and behind which she stood, pale, shrieking, trembling. While the bull

gored at Alvaredo Lopez de Ratz, that valiant young nobleman carved and

whittled the shaggy monster’s frothing nostrils right dexterously:

meantime, divers picadors, matadors, and cavaliers hastened to the

rescue of Miss Field, who was borne insensible from the arena.

But what of Alvaredo Lopez y Jesus de Ratz? Alas! his gored and lifeless

remains, mutilated beyond recognition, were raked up and gathered

together after the matadors had slain the infuriate bull. A braver man

was never borne from the battle-field on two-score and ten dust-pans!

Ever since that tragedy, Miss Field has disdained the advances of the

masculine sex. Pondering ever on the fate of her young Spanish suitor,

she never hears an impassioned avowal that she does not droop her pretty

head, and regretfully murmur, “Ratz!”

_More about Miss Field._

Miss Kate Field, who is to lecture in this city next Thursday evening,

is in many respects a most remarkable woman. None of her sex possesses

to so marked a degree every feminine charm, coupled with an intellectual

vigor that is certainly masculine. Miss Field’s life has been a romantic

one. She was born (about thirty years ago) in New Orleans, and was

educated in the Convent de St. Genevieve, near that city. When sixteen

years of age she was sent to Europe to “finish off;” but, while

travelling in Sicily, she was seized by brigands, who demanded seventy

thousand livres for her ransom. This sum was paid by the family of the

young girl, after she had been a captive for six weeks, during which

time she acquired a thorough acquaintance with the Italian language, and

obtained a complete knowledge of the customs of the banditti. A

narrative of her experience in the Sicilian fastnesses appeared in “El

Banano Napoli” (1865), and is now regarded as a model of Italian

romance. In 1867 Miss Field visited Spain as the guest of Signora

Serrano; and it was at this time that she was wooed by the young Marquis

Miguel Maria Jesus del Ratz, whose melancholy and tragic death, while

attending a bull-fight in Madrid, has already been detailed in these

columns. This was the one love-affair of Miss Field’s life; but the case

of Manrico Bolero, the chief of the banditti who abducted the fair girl,

deserves more than passing mention. It appears that while she was a

captive, this Bolero became deeply sensible of the personal and mental

charms of young Kate: his suit was vain, however, the conscientious girl

refusing to become the bandit’s bride. After she was ransomed, the image

of her beauty, and the recollection of her goodness and her wit, so

preyed upon the mind of the brigand, that he forsook his godless

occupations, distributed his ill-gotten gains among the poor, became an

inmate of a monastery, and even now, under the name of Brother Felix,

devotes his remaining days to Benedictine piety, and the manufacture of

a well-known cordial of the same name.

Miss Field returned to her native land in the spring of 1883, and since

that time has published numerous books, written and delivered several

lectures, and superintended a number of social reforms, calculated to

alleviate the sufferings of, and to emancipate from political bondage,

the feminine sex. The failure of her philanthropic movement in New York

some years ago, whereby she sought to introduce a female-suspender

system, which would supersede the odious female garter—this failure, we

say, was due wholly to the duplicity of the one man whom, with many

other noble women, she had admitted into a business partnership. But

since that unfortunate—though none the less praiseworthy—venture,

prosperity has attended the earnest little lady. Her literary work has

brought her handsome returns, her lectures have been highly profitable;

and certain investments in Washington real-estate have been so

fortunate, that she is now quoted by the leading commercial agencies

among the wealthy women of America.

_A Kentuckian’s Sagacity._

Col. William M. Haldeman, proprietor of “The Louisville

Courier-Journal,” has a very poor opinion of Henry Watterson’s business

capacity. The other day he opened one of Watterson’s editorial

correspondences, dated Paris. He handed it to the cashier to send up to

the editorial rooms.

“What is it?” asked the cashier.

“A letter from Watterson,” answered Haldeman: “I haven’t read it, but

it’s a long one about ‘The Latin Quarter.’”

“The Latin Quarter? What’s that?” asked the cashier, with his mouth

agape, and his eyes hanging out on his cheeks.

“I’m —— if I know,” said Haldeman; “but, if Watterson got it in change,

I’ll bet fifty to one that it’s a twenty-cent piece.”

_Col. Judd’s Narrow Escape._

The Hon. S. Corning Judd, our able non-partisan postmaster, has returned

from the South, where he has been travelling for several weeks. Although

his rheumatic pains have reduced his weight somewhat, he is the picture

of health; and his sojourn in Florida appears to have been one continued

round of excitement. He tells us of a marvellous adventure he had in

Florida. He says that when he reached Thomasville, he fell in with his

old friend, Col. J. H. McVicker, who inveigled him into going

alligator-hunting one day. A negro guide volunteered to conduct them to

an old bayou which had not been visited by white men for many years, and

which was actually alive with alligators. Col. McVicker was armed with a

Louis Sharpe’s rifle; and Col. Judd had the reliable old pepper-box

pistol, with which he used to perform prodigies of valor in Southern

Illinois during the civil war; so the twain felt tolerably secure. The

darkey guide piloted them along through a lone wood, over a deserted

rice-field, and through a luxuriant orange-grove, until they came to a

slimy pool that lay sequestered among the orange, banana, and palm

trees. Myriads of alligators swarmed upon the banks of this pool, and

the party paused to observe the ingenious manner in which the monstrous

reptiles secured their food. Of course, so far away from the haunts of

civilization, these alligators were not able to diet upon dogs, cats,

sheep, calves, pickaninnies, and other carnivorous prey, but were

compelled to subsist wholly upon vegetables and fruits. While Col.

McVicker and Col. Judd watched them, they saw the alligators poise

themselves on their scaly snouts, and with magnificent sweeps of their

long tails knock down the red oranges and yellow bananas from the tall

trees o’erhead. It was observed that not less than a barrel of bananas

and a bushel of oranges satisfied the average alligator; whereas in

other parts of the South, the very largest alligator has been known to

be sated with a moderately plump six-year old negro child. Eager for the

combat, Col. McVicker rested his old reliable Louis Sharpe’s rifle on

the stump of a hemlock, drew a bead on the biggest alligator in range,

and blazed away. The unerring ball sped like lightning toward its

victim, and struck the alligator on his massive forehead; but, so far

from wounding the miserable reptile, it rebounded again, and buried

itself to the depth of eight inches in the bark of a palm-tree near by.

While Col. McVicker was reloading, Col. Judd popped away at the

alligators with his relic of the civil war, and the alligators seemed to

regard this as a species of delightful humor. However, one old alligator

bethought himself of a device whereby he might circumvent the

assailants: he cautiously circled around through the orange-grove, and

came up behind the two Chicago sportsmen as they lay in ambush. Then,

all at once, Col. Judd felt himself nipped rudely by the legs; and the

next thing he knew, he was being scuttled off toward the slimy pool,

between the remorseless jaws of the monster alligator. His struggles

were vain; and what increased his horror of death was the hideous

thought that he was about to be cut off in the very flower of his career

as postmaster at Chicago. Deaf to his piteous entreaties, the alligator

trundled his human prey down into the pool; and there the twain

floundered about, amid the green slime and malarious ooze. Catching a

fleeting glimpse of his friend McVicker in the crotch of an orange-tree,

Col. Judd threw him a farewell kiss with his mud-stained hand. Then the

alligator rolled Col. Judd under his tongue, and chewed on him a brief

spell with his cruel fangs. But presently the alligator stopped chewing.

“My friend,” said the alligator hesitatingly, “I hate to disappoint you,

but I’m afraid I’ll have to let you go ashore.”

Col. Judd listened: a new hope dawned in his bosom.

“The truth is,” continued the alligator, “I’ve been raised on a

vegetable diet; but for years I have heard a great deal about that

appetizing and palatable delicacy called human blood. I hoped to get a

sample of this delicacy in you, but I find that I misplaced my

confidence. Being somewhat of a dyspeptic, I hardly think that skin and

bones would sit well on my stomach, with the fruit I have already eaten

to-day. So, if you are so disposed, you may crawl out and go ashore.”

_A White-House Ballad.—I._

Culture's garland · 第 30 / 45 题