CHAPTER VIII

THE STORY OF THE REPUBLIC

“GOLD,” said Columbus in a letter to King Ferdinand, “is the most

excellent of metals. With gold we not only do whatever we please in this

world, but we can employ it to snatch souls from Purgatory and to people

Paradise.” This was the keynote to the Spanish character and explains

the difference between the civilizations established by Spain and other

colonizing nations. Thrifty activity was regarded with disdain by the

cavalier and each man sought only enough money to live on the interest

of it, or to establish a trust fund for his family. The government

imposed on each of its colonies a multitude of officials, since nowhere

in the world were there so many nobles for whom it was necessary to

provide honourable employment, and an opportunity to acquire the riches

that were deemed so desirable. This greed for gold and contempt for all

industrial and agricultural pursuits is perhaps the most remarkable

feature of Spain’s colonial policy.

“The Spaniards,” says a historian, “conceived the Americans to be

animals of an inferior nature, who were not entitled to the rights and

privileges of men. In peace they subjected them to servitude. In war

they paid no regard to those laws, which, by a tacit convention between

contending nations, regulate hostility and set bounds to its rage.” The

history of the conquest of Guatemala is but another story of war, rapine

and slavery similar to the other conquests of Spain. We have the

testimony of Alvarado himself upon this point. On one occasion he wrote

to Cortez: “That day I killed and captured many people, many of them

captains and persons of rank.” At another time he wrote: “That I might

bring them to the service of His Majesty, I determined to burn the

lords; and I burned them and commanded their city to be burned and razed

to its foundations.” Prisoners were branded on the cheeks and thighs and

sold as slaves at public auction, one-fifth of the money realized going

to the Spanish crown in all cases. It was not many months until

Guatemala acknowledged the sovereignty of Spain, and, with Chiapas, now

the southernmost state of the republic of Mexico, was made a province

with a resident captain-general.

[Illustration: INDIAN GIRL.]

The rule of Spain lasted for nearly three centuries, from 1524 to 1821.

Under their system of government the natives were looked upon as lawful

prey and were oppressed in every possible way. Las Casas, and a few of

the other priests, endeavoured to prevent extreme cruelty, although even

their methods would not appear very high, according to present

standards. The policy of Spain was always narrow and selfish. The

unlimited power of the clergy and their immunity from the civil laws

made them arrogant and intolerant. Even before the death of Alvarado, in

1541, there were numerous uprisings of the Indians which were crushed

with an iron hand. The false system of government created distrust in

all, so that no man put confidence in his neighbour. The Inquisition,

that terrible institution of blind hatred and bigotry, flourished here

with all its malevolence and many were its victims. Although the Indians

were exempt from its action, it gave a ready way to dispose of anyone

who made himself particularly obnoxious to the powers that were, and the

offenders were turned over to the tender mercies of those who seemed to

rejoice in human suffering and misery. We turn with horror from the

sacrificial altars of the Aztec and Toltec races; and yet a careful

search by historians has not found any persecution for opinion’s sake

among these people, but their offerings were all made to please their

deities.

As generation after generation of American-born but European-descended

Guatemalans arose and a certain national spirit and feeling was

developed, these persons demanded some recognition and at least a

limited degree of home rule. This Spain would not grant, but continued

to send her viceroys, captains-general, archbishops, etc., from the

mother country. Of the one hundred and seventy viceroys who ruled in the

Americas, only four were of American birth, and those were reared and

educated in Spain. It was the same with the archbishops, bishops,

captains-general and other chief officials.

The opening of the nineteenth century was pregnant with important events

both in Europe and America. The success of the English colonists in

overthrowing the foreign yoke acted as a leaven in spreading

dissatisfaction throughout the Spanish colonies. Napoleon was at the

height of his power and was upturning monarchies with a reckless hand.

Affairs in Spain culminated in the detention by this Lord of Europe of

the King of Spain, Ferdinand VII, and the other members of the royal

family at Bayonne, France, until he forced them to resign their rights

to the Spanish crown in his favour. Joseph Napoleon, brother of the

emperor, was crowned as King of Spain. Heretofore the Audiencia,

captain-general and archbishop of Guatemala, though many times wishing

for freedom, could not bring themselves to discard the country that gave

them birth, religion and civilization. Even educated Indians, though

desiring independence, looked upon the ruling power with fear and an

almost superstitious reverence. Napoleon’s acts of violence and

usurpation of the throne upon which all Spanish subjects looked with

such veneration broke this enchantment, greatly stimulated the desire

for freedom and gave it new impetus. Up to this time the subjects of

Spain in Central America had been allowed no voice in their own

government save as timid petitioners. At last the right was granted to

Guatemala to choose a deputy who should reside at the court, and on

March 3rd, 1810, Manuel Jose Pavon y Munoz was chosen for this position.

Promises of reform were held out by the Spanish Cortes, but nothing

seemed to be done in good faith and the patience of those governed was

gradually exhausted.

A constant espionage was maintained by the police by way of

intimidation. Informers and spies seemed omnipresent. Jose Bustamente,

of Guerra, the newly-appointed captain-general, adopted stringent

measures to stem the rising tide of insurrection. No intelligent native

was free from suspicion which frequently resulted in his imprisonment or

exile. A long memorial sent to the Spanish Cortes setting forth the

causes of discontent resulted in the adoption of an organic code which

promised reform and for a few months had a beneficial effect.

It was on the 15th of September, 1810, that the patriot-priest Hidalgo

issued his famous _pronunciamento_ declaring the sovereignty of Spain at

an end in Mexico. The news of his success again stimulated the germs of

independence in Guatemala and they began to germinate in secret among

the more intelligent of both Creoles and natives. The government used

every means to keep the people in ignorance of the real events in Mexico

and South America and spread reports of great government successes in

putting down the insurrections. Restiveness and despair fell upon many

and the hopes of a better government by Spain evaporated. Men were

unwilling to live longer under such despotism, and they began to look

upon even death as a relief.

In 1811, _pronunciamentos_ began to appear in a number of cities in the

Kingdom of Guatemala, and on November 5th of that year the first blow

was struck for freedom by the capture of several thousand muskets and a

large sum of money in the Salvador treasury. The Archbishop granted

eighty days indulgences for those not participating in the revolutionary

movements, but this promise had little effect among the thinking

classes. The masses, on the other hand, were in a degraded condition,

socially, intellectually and morally, and controlled by an ignorant

fanaticism. The most absurd doctrines and miracles were implicitly

believed in, and fealty to the sovereigns, so they were taught, was a

high virtue.

Spain was practically helpless because of her troubles in Mexico and

South America where formidable revolutions were in progress. Because of

this no large armies were sent and there was no great war for

independence. During the years from 1811 to 1821, however, there were

thousands of victims to the cause of independence throughout all of

Central America and Chiapas—men who sacrificed life, liberty and

freedom. Even if there were no great bloody fields of carnage or

brilliant feats of arms, as in Mexico, there were tragedies in

abundance, and the lives sacrificed upon the sacred altar of patriotism

were as precious as those slain in battle in other countries. The Betlen

conspiracy, in 1813, led by a patriotic priest, gained considerable

headway, but the conspirators soon found themselves in prison through a

betrayal of their plans. In 1814, a national constitution was proclaimed

by Spain through her representative, Bustamente, but few believed that

it was in good faith. The desire for separation from the galling yoke of

Spain had taken too strong a hold to be appeased by a little sop.

Finally, in 1821, Spain’s representative, Señor Gavino Gainza, joined

the rebels. On the 14th of September of that year the government house

in Guatemala City was thronged by representatives of the people who came

to attend a meeting that had been called by Gainza. Immediate

independence was advised by the majority of those representatives and

every attempt at a vacillating policy was defeated. Every vote for

independence was received by the citizens who had gathered on the plaza

with loud applause and those against it with groans. The

anti-independents fearing for their lives retired from the palace, but

they were not molested. An _Acta de Independencia_ was then drawn up,

adopted, signed and sworn to by all those who were present, and publicly

proclaimed on the following day. This act declared Guatemalans to be a

free and independent people and invited citizens of the provinces to

elect at once representatives to a national congress to be convened on

the 1st day of March, 1822, on the basis of one representative for each

fifteen thousand inhabitants. This was just two hundred and ninety-seven

years, three months and nineteen days from the time Alvarado and his

followers took possession of the country.

A provisional _junta_ was formed to advise with Gainza, who had

apparently thrown his die with independence, but secretly—so it is

claimed—intended to deal doubly. Chiapas had proclaimed independence a

few days earlier and was the first province of the Guatemala

captain-generalcy, or Kingdom of Guatemala, as it was called, to throw

off the Spanish yoke. San Salvador followed on the 21st of September,

Honduras on the 16th of October, Nicaragua on the 21st of October and

Costa Rica on the 27th of October. All of these provinces formally

accepted the Plan of Iguala proclaimed by Iturbide of Mexico, which

provided as follows: preservation of the Roman Catholic Church;

independence under a monarchical form of government with a prince of the

royal house of Spain as ruler; union and equality of Spaniards and

Mexicans and Central Americans.

The change to freedom was not easy after three centuries of misrule. The

abolishment of slavery forty years before the United States freed her

black men was one good omen. Two parties, conservatives and liberals,

sprang up. The most of the enlightened ones espoused the cause of the

liberals, while the old families, those with race prejudice, and the

clergy adhered to the conservative cause, although many of the priests

were in the front rank of those battling for independence. Thus the

state cast adrift without any fixed policy.

The idea of annexation to Mexico began to grow popular. Iturbide, who

had in the meantime made himself Emperor of Mexico, sent messengers to

Gainza, who espoused that cause and began to persecute those opposed to

that idea. Republicans were insulted and even conversations on the

street on political subjects were prohibited. The _junta_ decreed

annexation on the 5th of January, 1822, and the people were given all

the rights of Mexican citizens. This union only lasted for about fifteen

months and was dissolved soon after the fall of the Emperor Iturbide.

The only tangible results of the union were internal strife and heavy

taxes.

In 1823 a congress of the states of Central America was summoned to meet

in Guatemala City. This congress assembled in June as the Asamblea

Nacional Constituyente and remained in session nearly two years. It

founded the United Provinces of Central America, but difficulties soon

set in between the different provinces. A constitution was framed and

promulgated in 1825 for which the constitution of the United States was

taken as a model. Arcé was proclaimed the first president in the same

year and was soon after recognized by most of the leading powers.

Conflicts arose very soon between the federal and local authorities in

Guatemala City, which city had been made the capital of the

confederation. The vice-president, Flores, retired to Quezaltenango,

where he was attacked by an infuriated mob of natives on the 13th of

October, 1826. He sought refuge in the pulpit of the parish church from

whence he was dragged by a mob of women and literally torn to pieces.

The Indians had been aroused by a Spanish priest who attributed a

pestilence to him. A reign of religious fanaticism soon followed and

troops from San Salvador invaded Guatemala to restore order. Convents

and monasteries were suppressed by the government, but Arcé found

himself unable to preserve order, and resigned the presidency.

In 1799, there was born in Honduras a child named Francisco Morazan, who

was destined to be the greatest figure in this Central American

Confederation. His father was a Frenchman and his mother a native Creole

woman of that country. We know little of his youth except that he

managed to acquire a fair education for that age. He grew up to be a man

of impetuous but not sanguinary temperament, and was possessed of great

decision and perseverance. His bearing was free and manly; his manner

was frank and open; his domestic life was exemplary. After holding

several minor offices in Honduras he became secretary-general of that

province, then Senator and _jefe_, or governor, but his bent was that of

a warrior. Revolution broke out at La Antigua, in Guatemala, and this

province then placed itself under the protection and leadership of

General Morazan, who had an army of about two thousand men, and who had

espoused the cause of the malcontents. With this small force Morazan

besieged Guatemala City, the capital of the federation, and the city

soon capitulated. General Morazan thereupon assumed the power of state

and used much vigour, but was just. He afterwards wrote, “No one was put

to death or had money exacted from him.” This was an almost unheard of

leniency in Central America, but he had no cause to regret this

magnanimity, even though there was much blood to avenge and there were

many grievances to punish.

A period of reaction followed, for the servile conservative party, which

had been hitherto dominant, fell. It seemed almost as though Morazan had

been called by Providence itself. Some cruel measures by his followers

and supporters followed, but the best authorities do not blame him

personally for those acts, as he seemed to be above petty measures for

the purpose of revenge. It was even decreed that all salaries that had

been paid for several years be refunded to the national treasury and

harsh means were taken to collect them. A few months later another man

was elected president by the new congress that had been chosen, although

Morazan was the real power behind the throne, but at that time he

preferred the military command. Many prisoners were exiled, the

archbishop and a number of friars expelled, and all monastic

institutions, except one, were suppressed by the new government. Because

of fear of trouble from Spain all property of Spanish subjects was

ordered sequestered until that country formally recognized independence.

It was ever a struggle between the church party and the anti-clericals.

On one side were arrayed the sincere adherents of the church and the

clergy, many of whom were bigoted as well as covetous. In the other

party were the honest patriots and those who expected to reap emolument

from the confiscation of church property. In addition there was a

floating class of professional revolutionists who threw their lot with

whichever party promised the greatest reward, and the bandits who would

rob a church as cheerfully as a lonely traveller on the road.

[Illustration: A PEON.]

It is difficult to realize how long it takes to throw away temporal and

spiritual fetters, even though they are self-forged. The people of

Central America felt lost without harness and reins, whip and spurs, as

soon as a little freedom had been gained. They did not know what to do

with their liberty which many interpreted to mean license. They thought

it consisted of wranglings for place, of wars of brothers against

brothers, of priests against people. A self-styled aristocracy and

ignorant rabble both contributed to the discontent.

They had copied the letter and not the spirit of American institutions.

The scheming politicians would hesitate at nothing to attain private

ends or personal aggrandizement. The aristocracy were impetuous by

nature and impatient of restraint, while the peons were indolent and

accepted whatever condition fell to them.

Finally, in 1830, Morazan was elected president at the regular election

and assumed office on the 16th day of September. Ignoring all precedents

this new ruler turned his first attention and efforts to further

education. Peace reigned for a short time, but the demon of political

strife was soon let loose again. The former president, who had just

failed of re-election, invaded Guatemala with about a hundred

discontented ones from Mexico, and another revolutionist entered the

country from the opposite border with a couple of hundred negroes from

Honduras, but both were defeated by the prompt measures of the

government. Yet in this victory was actual defeat, for the dissolution

of the confederation really dated from this time. Congress adopted some

liberal measures at the instance of Morazan, among which were absolute

freedom of conscience and the right to worship God according to the

dictates of conscience, both of which measures showed an advanced spirit

of toleration. This liberty, however, angered the clericals who did not

favour the progressive policies of Morazan. Furthermore, and this was

the most powerful influence, the smaller states were jealous of

Guatemala, because of her predominance both in population and area, and

they demanded an equal voice in the government. It was one of the same

troubles that confronted the colonies during the early days of the

republic. Beginning with the withdrawal of Nicaragua, in December, 1832,

all the provinces formally withdrew from the confederation within a few

months.

A scourge of cholera in 1837 was taken advantage of by certain fanatics

of the clerical party, who made the ignorant rabble believe that the

waters had been poisoned in order to destroy the natives and make room

for foreigners. That such a movement should be successful seems almost

incredible in this day and age, but its effect soon spread over the

whole land, and the government was helpless when opposed by blind

fanaticism. Cries for vengeance were heard on every side, and many

physicians were put to death with cruel tortures, such as being

compelled to swallow the entire contents of their medicine chests.

Rafael Carrera, whose hostilities resembled highway robbery rather than

civilized warfare, soon became the head of the revolt, aided by a

certain class of priests who termed him the “Protecting Angel Rafael.”

The government put a price on Carrera’s head and the following notice

was posted throughout the country:

“The person or persons who may deliver the criminal Rafael

Carrera, dead or alive (if he does not voluntarily present

himself under the last pardon), shall receive a reward of

fifteen hundred dollars and two caballerias of land, and pardon

for any crime he has committed.

“The general-in-chief,

“J. N. CARVALLO.

“_Guatemala, July 20th, 1838._”

Outlaws and robbers joined this new leader, while the main body of

troops were men in rags armed with all kinds of weapons from rusty

muskets to knives on long poles; and even sticks shaped like muskets

with tin-plate locks were carried by many. As this oddly-assorted band

approached Guatemala City thousands of women joined them with sacks to

carry away the loot and plunder. Viva la religion! Death to the

foreigners! were the cries that filled the air as they entered the walls

of the capital. The government, knowing its own weakness and also

Carrera’s mercenary disposition, finally compromised by paying Carrera

$1,000 for his own use and $10,000 to be distributed among his troops,

and making him a general in the army. A foolish compromise! An

injudicious surrender! Temporary quiet was followed by more and greater

disorder, and Morazan was compelled soon afterwards to flee to San

Salvador, then to Costa Rica, where he was openly insulted, and finally

to South America, where he found peace and quiet.

A quiet life did not suit the spirit of General Morazan, for he soon

after returned to Costa Rica and became involved in the political

troubles of that country. As in Honduras and Guatemala his sword was

found on the side of freedom and against oppression. Ill luck followed

his forces and he was captured by treachery and the promise of immunity.

He was cast in irons and a mock trial held at which he was condemned to

die within three hours. The prospect of death did not break the brave

spirit of this remarkable man, and he dictated his will and a defence of

his actions, and then boldly faced the squad of executioners. He himself

gave the command to fire, after seeing that good aim was taken by the

soldiers. Thus died at San Jose, Costa Rica, on the 15th of September,

1842, the twenty-first anniversary of freedom from the Spanish yoke,

perhaps the greatest statesman that Central America has yet produced. He

was misunderstood, maligned and killed, but his last words were

prophetic:

“Posterity will do me justice.”

Carrera was only about twenty-one years of age when he first became the

leader of the clerical, or servile, forces. Of base birth, his mother

being a well-known market woman, he was so ignorant that he could not

even write his name, and signed official documents with a rubber stamp;

of a violent and irascible temper and the slave of violent passions, yet

he was bold, determined and persevering; constantly beaten, yet he

always managed to escape. From a common servant he became a pig driver

and later the absolute dictator of Guatemala for many years. At first

the mere tool of the priests, they were afterwards obliged to put up

with the insults and abuse of the man whom they had raised up to a

position of power. His vanity knew no bounds and there was no limit to

his cruelty. He beat men, pulled out their hair and beards; violated

women, cut off their tresses and ears; and, while president, he

occasionally shot men on the plaza for effect. On one occasion he

ordered eighteen prominent citizens of Quezaltenango shot on the plaza

as an example to the rest of the inhabitants.

John L. Stephens, an American diplomat, who met Carrera many times, has

given us a vivid picture of this man. He describes him as about five

feet, six inches in height, with straight black hair and an Indian

complexion. Stephens happened to be in a town that was captured by

Carrera. Every inhabitant was compelled to shout, Viva Carrera! If the

person hesitated a gun would be aimed at his breast and, if he refused,

it would be fired. _Viva la Patria!_ was never thought of, for Carrera

was the government. He never talked of how many prisoners he took, but

it was always how many of the enemy were killed, for prisoners were not

desired.

Carrera raised his army by promising the natives the plunder of the

capital, says Stephens. He approached it with a tumultuous mass of

half-naked savages, men, women and children, estimated at ten or twelve

thousand. Several well-known outlaws, criminals, robbers and murderers

were with him. The “General” rode on horseback with a green bush in his

hat which was hung around with pieces of cotton cloth covered with

pictures of saints, wore a pair of green, frieze trousers, and a fine

coat covered with gold embroidery. The natives all had green bushes in

their hats, looking like a moving forest as they marched down the

streets of the capital. As they proceeded the soldiers cried: “Viva la

religion and death to the foreigners.” One captive general was placed

sidewise on a mule with his feet tied under the animal, and his face

bruised, swollen, and disfigured by stones and blows of _machetes_. Many

other prisoners were tied together with ropes. This was similar to the

invasion of Rome by the barbaric hordes of the north.

Although virtually the head of the government from the flight of

Morazan, in 1839, he was not formally chosen president until 1844. The

clerical party called him “Son of God” and “Our Lord,” and hailed him as

their saviour. A few years later he resigned because of trouble, but did

not entirely give up his power, and in 1852 was made president for life

and occupied that position until his death on the 14th of April, 1865,

just about the time of the death of President Lincoln. He was even able

through legislative enactment to name his successor. Congress had

declared him a hero and the preserver of the republic and ordered his

bust engraved on all coins. Guatemala had finally declared her

independence the 21st day of March, 1847, as the Republic of Guatemala

instead of a state within the confederation, by which designation it had

formerly been known, although the confederation had been practically

dissolved many years before.

His successor, Vicente Cerna, was a man of very ordinary ability and a

religious fanatic. He was a warm friend of the Jesuits and his greatest

recommendation was that he went to confession once each week as

regularly and conscientiously as he took his meals. He could not control

the discordant elements and insurrections soon sprang up on every hand,

even though he had the united support of the church party. New and

powerful leaders of the opposition came into prominence. The most

influential opponent of the government at this time was Serapio Cruz,

who was ably supported by Granados and J. Rufino Barrios, hitherto a

refugee in Chiapas. Cruz invaded Guatemala from Chiapas in 1869 with

only twenty-five men. His numbers gradually swelled as he proceeded

across the country, although only a small portion were supplied with

firearms. Some carried _machetes_, while many more were entirely

unarmed. He was finally defeated in an engagement with the government

forces near the capital and his head was carried into the city as a

ghastly trophy and a warning to other revolutionists. Granados and

Barrios kept up the struggle with varying success for many months. They

finally gathered up a couple of small armies and marched toward

Guatemala City. Their journey was almost a triumphal procession and they

entered that city as victors as Cerna fled.

H. H. Bancroft, the able and painstaking historian of Spanish North

America, says that the result of thirty years of conservative rule in

Guatemala was two hundred lazy and stupid monks, two hundred almost

useless nuns, one archbishop, two bishops, fifteen vicars and canons, a

foreign debt of five million dollars. There were no schools, roads,

bridges, or telegraphs. The postal facilities were inadequate, and

immense tracts of unproductive land owned by the church brought no

revenue for the support of the government. This is a terrific

arraignment of that party and explains in a great measure why that

country has lagged behind so far in the onward march of progress. And

yet its history down to that time is not much worse than that of Mexico

for the same period.

Granados was first made president after the flight of Cerna, but he was

soon after, in 1872, succeeded by General Barrios, who ruled the country

with an iron hand for more than a dozen years and was practically

dictator during that time. Opinions differ a great deal concerning this

man, but the passing years show the farsightedness of his policies. I

talked with a great many people who knew him at the American Club in

Guatemala City. All admit that he was a greater man than any of his

successors, and that he was a better one is nearly as generally

conceded. He was resourceful and iron-willed, but progressive; he drove

his political opponents out of the country mercilessly and made many

bitter enemies as a result; his friends were few because he never

confided his plans to them in advance, although he would do anything for

them that lay within his power and did not conflict with his purposes.

One writer, who met him, has analyzed his character as follows: “In

disposition he was sympathetic and affectionate; when he liked a man he

showered favours upon him; when he distrusted, he was cold and

repellent; and when he hated, his vengeance was swift and sure. He did

everything with a nervous impetuosity, thought rapidly and acted

instantly.”

Guatemala began to make progress from the very beginning of the rule—and

I say rule, not administration, advisedly—of Barrios. A new constitution

was adopted by the national assembly convened for that purpose, and he

was re-elected president in 1880 by popular suffrage, which was really

the only constitutional election ever held in the country up to that

time. With all the energy of his nature he fostered education and

endeavoured to uplift the masses by improving their condition and

cultivating their understanding. Following the example of the other

Spanish-American republics the Jesuits were banished, and much of the

church property was confiscated and appropriated to the cause of

education and for other public uses. He gave liberal concessions to

railroads, constructed cart roads, erected telegraph lines and greatly

improved the finances of the country by a new system of taxation. He

even persuaded the Presbyterian Church of the United States to send a

missionary to the country, paying all of his travelling expenses and

providing him and his family with accommodations. The missionary opened

a Sunday school in the capital, to which the President sent his own

children and urged his officials to do the same. Thus, for a time at

least, the Protestant Mission was very popular and fashionable. He

enforced the observance of the Sabbath and made everyone send their

children to the public schools or pay for the privilege of sending them

to private schools.

[Illustration: J. RUFINO BARRIOS.]

Although the government established by him was not of the people nor by

the people, he fully intended it to be for the people. His failure

probably was due to his lack of that conciliation and diplomacy which

Porfirio Diaz used so successfully during the first few years of his

presidency in Mexico, by which means he united the discordant elements.

In view of the radical measures undertaken by Barrios it is not

surprising that powerful enemies were made who on numerous occasions

attempted his life. One plot was made in a woman’s house, similar to

that of Mrs. Surratt’s, where the plot to kill Lincoln was formed, but

the woman revealed it, and seventeen of the leaders were executed on the

main plaza in the capital.

One evening President Barrios and a couple of friends were walking in

the little garden surrounding the theatre where they were going to

attend a performance. Suddenly there was a streak of flame through the

night air and with a thud a bomb fell almost at the feet of Barrios. The

fuse sizzled and flashed as it burned, but the man for whom it was

intended was as cool and unperturbed as if the deadly bomb was nothing

more than a toy firecracker. Coolly picking it up, he put out the fuse

with his hand and, turning to his companions, said in an unconcerned

way: “The rascals don’t know how to kill me.” The President displayed

magnanimity toward these plotters by pardoning all those concerned

except the leader, who was sent into exile.

In 1881, President Barrios visited the United States and was received

with the highest consideration by the government in Washington and by

the authorities in many other cities. He came to invite this government

to mediate the boundary difficulties between Guatemala and Mexico, which

was done. The following year he visited Europe and again crossed the

United States on his return. In this way he endeavoured to get new ideas

for the betterment of his country, and went back home with a renewed

determination to establish a great nation in Central America.

For years the idea of a union of all the Central American republics had

been cherished by Barrios as it had been by a number of his

predecessors. In fact this idea has been the dream of nearly every

president of each one of the Central American republics even to this

day. Barrios thought this would be beneficial not only to his own land

but to each one of the states. The methods he pursued were no worse than

England and other countries have followed from time immemorial to

accomplish similar ends. He was on good terms with all of the republics.

San Salvador had presented him with a sword of honour in token of her

esteem, and Costa Rica had made him a general in her army in recognition

of her friendship.

The President of Honduras had signified his willingness to enter into

such a union. Likewise the President of San Salvador had led him to

believe that he favoured the movement. Nicaragua and Costa Rica refused

to enter into a confederation. Nevertheless, Barrios, trusting in the

ability of the three rulers to control the situation, issued a

proclamation on the 28th of February, 1885, declaring a federation of

the five Central American republics and proclaiming himself as Supreme

Military Chief until a choice could be made. President Zaldivar of San

Salvador played him false and the scheme failed. Zaldivar was able to do

this as he controlled the cables and either refused to send or garbled

the dispatches forwarded to the other powers. Barrios was not daunted,

but invaded San Salvador to compel Zaldivar to yield. His oldest son was

killed in battle on the 21st of April, and Barrios himself was shot from

ambush when he went back to search for the body of his son. His remains

are buried in a cemetery near Guatemala City, and the grave is marked by

a slender, broken column set upon a great square, wooden cenotaph. His

widow and six children soon after embarked for the United States, where

Barrios had made investments to provide for just such a contingency.

Barrios was succeeded by Manuel Lisandro Barillas, a man of kind and

benevolent instincts but ill fitted to control a turbulent republic like

Guatemala. He at once withdrew the decree of federation which had proven

so ill-timed and made peace with the other republics. Little was

accomplished by him, although he attempted to continue the reform

policies of Barrios. He was elected for and served for one full term,

but was defeated for re-election by a nephew of the elder Barrios. This

soured him and from that time until his death he was a more or less

turbulent factor in the Guatemala political situation. When I was in

that country he was in Chiapas, on the border of Guatemala, where, as I

was informed by an American who had seen him, he had a force of

twenty-five men “armed to the teeth.” This seems like a small force, but

Granados had no more when he made his successful march and overthrew the

existing government. Barillas had figured that the malcontents would

flock to him as soon as he entered the country. He had sacrificed his

all, and even his daughters had sold their diamonds to purchase guns and

ammunition for his campaign. The President of Mexico compelled him to

leave their territory, and President Cabrera rushed troops to the

border, so that the movement was a fiasco. Had it not been for this, the

result might have been different, for the discontented in Guatemala at

that time numbered many.

Ex-President Barillas was killed in the City of Mexico on the 7th day of

April, 1907, aged sixty-seven years. He was riding on a street car when

a youth of seventeen climbed aboard and stabbed him twice in the neck,

the first blow severing the jugular vein. The assassin was a young

Guatemalan who seemed to have come to Mexico for that purpose.

The successor of Barillas as president, José Maria Reina Barrios, served

only a few years and developed no marked policy. He was a man of energy

and strong will, but did not possess the ability or strength of

character of his uncle. During the first few years of his term he gave

the country a fairly good government and worked much for the prosperity

of Guatemala. Near the close of his first term, however, he sought by

legislative enactment to extend his term of office for five years, and a

series of revolutions followed. In February, 1898, he was assassinated

on the streets of Guatemala City by a foreigner, evidently an anarchist,

and the country was left in a disastrous condition.

The _Premier Designado_, which corresponds to the position of

Vice-President under our form of government, at the time of the

assassination of Reina Barrios, was Manuel Estrada Cabrera. He was a

lawyer by profession and the first civilian to hold that office since

the establishment of the republic. Upon his accession to the presidency

he found the country involved in many serious complications. The foreign

obligations were threatening to precipitate trouble with international

entanglements, and the new President at once exerted every effort to

place this indebtedness in a more favourable condition, and to organize

the finances in such a way that the legitimate demands of creditors

might be met. It is only fair to Cabrera to say that he succeeded in

these efforts even more than might have been expected by his most

sanguine supporters. His legal training stood him in good stead. The

finances of the country were reorganized, foreign creditors were

appeased, and, after the first few years, for he was elected to a full

term in September of the same year, the way to permanent peace and

prosperity seemed to open up wide. Guatemala appeared for a while to be

preparing to follow in the footsteps of Mexico, and Cabrera’s adherents

enthusiastically prophesied for him a career as great and meritorious as

that of Mexico’s wonderful statesman.

“Cabrera is a wonderful man. He will do for Guatemala what Diaz has done

for Mexico.” Thus spoke a high official of that government to me

concerning Manuel Estrada Cabrera, who has now been at the head of the

government for more than eleven years.

It seems to me, however, that President Cabrera has signally failed in

many ways. He lacks in the quality of “_simpatica_,” a Spanish term that

it is difficult to translate into English. He has failed to attract the

affection and confidence of his people sufficiently to establish

permanent peace and tranquillity. Although revolutions have not been

successful, or even formidable, yet it has been only by the exercise of

the most severe military measures and police espionage at all times that

such has not been the result. That severity alone does not suffice to

make a ruler respected, or even feared, has been demonstrated over and

over again. It is not the schoolmaster who inflicts the severest

penalties who preserves the best order in the schoolroom, and it is not

the ruler who inaugurates a reign of terror who lays the surest

foundation for permanent peace and prosperity. In a Latin-American

republic, where the president is the ruler, and not a figurehead, he

must possess that peculiar and undefinable ascendency of character, that

personal magnetism which lays a spell on the popular imagination and

impels them to submit to his wishes willingly. If he lacks in either of

those essentials, his influence will soon wane, other leaders will

receive the popular plaudits, and a revulsion of public favour will

leave the late favourite high and dry upon the deserted strand.

The best elucidation that can be made of this subject is by a comparison

between the careers of President Cabrera and Diaz. The latter succeeded

to a government that had been in the throes of revolution for

three-fourths of a century, with a bankrupt treasury and a large foreign

debt, the army disorganized, and the country overrun with bandits; and

yet in his first term of four years, and in a country seven or eight

times greater both in area and population, he accomplished far more for

the betterment of Mexico than Cabrera has in eleven years at the head of

affairs in Guatemala. Diaz used harsh measures where necessary, but he

has accomplished more by diplomacy and the exercise of good judgment

than he has by the use of mere force. To-day there is only one party in

Mexico and that is the Diaz party.

That there is great dissatisfaction in Guatemala the events of recent

years fully indicate. In 1907 an attempt was made upon the life of

President Cabrera by exploding a mine, but this failed. Severe measures

were adopted by the officials, and several of those suspected of

implication in the plot were put to death, while a larger number were

imprisoned _incommunicado_—that is, without privilege of communication

with friends or counsel. Among this number were several foreigners who

were suspected of designs against the President. Again, in April, 1908,

another attack was made upon the President by some of his soldiers and

he narrowly escaped death by shooting. The conditions that followed have

been described as a “regime of terror” because of the many executions

and incarcerations. An official report stated that eighteen men were

court-martialed and sentenced to be shot for participation in this

conspiracy.

The worst condemnation, I think, was the attitude of President Cabrera

and his ministers toward Mexico when that government wanted him to give

up certain persons for trial on the charge of conspiracy in the murder

of ex-President Barillas, which had occurred on Mexican soil. Cabrera

absolutely declined to grant this request, and his refusal almost

resulted in the breaking off of all diplomatic relations between the two

countries, and a conflict between the two governments was for a time

imminent. This condition has, however, passed away and cordial relations

now exist between the two republics. Furthermore, Cabrera has

consistently refrained from becoming involved in the various conflicts

that have raged between Nicaragua and its neighbours, and has been an

active supporter of the Central American peace conference which was

brought about by the influence of the United States.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Guatemala and Her People of To-day Being an Account of the Land, Its History and Development; the People, Their Customs and Characteristics; to Which Are Added Chapters on British Honduras and the Republic of Honduras, with References to the Other Countries of Central America, Salvador, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica · 第 8 / 12 章