CHAPTER I

E-text prepared by Juliet Sutherland, Barbara Kosker, and the Project

Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net)

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this

file which includes the original maps.

See 31789-h.htm or 31789-h.zip:

(https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/31789/pg31789-images.html)

or

(https://www.gutenberg.org/files/31789/31789-h.zip)

THE UNITED STATES AND LATIN AMERICA

by

JOHN HOLLADAY LATANE

PH. D., LL. D.

Professor of American History and Dean of the

College Faculty in the Johns Hopkins University

Author of "From Isolation to Leadership,"

"America as a World Power," etc.

[Illustration]

Garden City New York

Doubleday, Page & Company

1920

Copyright, 1920, by

Doubleday, Page & Company

All Rights Reserved, Including That of Translation

into Foreign Languages, Including the Scandinavian

[Illustration: SOUTH AMERICA]

TO THE MEMORY OF

MY FATHER

WHOSE DAILY COMMENTS ON PUBLIC QUESTIONS

WERE MY FIRST LESSONS IN THE STUDY

OF POLITICS

AND TO

MY MOTHER

WHO IMPARTED TO ME A LOVE OF HISTORY

AND WHOSE APPROVAL IS STILL THE RICHEST

REWARD OF MY EFFORTS

PREFACE

This book is based on a smaller volume issued by the Johns Hopkins Press

in 1900 under the title "The Diplomatic Relations of the United States

and Spanish America," which contained the first series of Albert Shaw

Lectures on Diplomatic History. That volume has been out of print for

several years, but calls for it are still coming in, with increasing

frequency of late. In response to this demand and in view of the

widespread interest in our relations with our Southern neighbors I have

revised and enlarged the original volume, omitting much that was of

special interest at the time it was written, and adding a large amount

of new matter relating to the events of the past twenty years.

Chapters I, II and V are reprinted with only minor changes; III, IV and

VI have been rewritten and brought down to date; VII, VIII and IX are

wholly new.

J. H. L.

BALTIMORE,

May 7, 1920.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I THE REVOLT OF THE SPANISH COLONIES 3

II THE RECOGNITION OF THE SPANISH-AMERICAN

REPUBLICS 48

III THE DIPLOMACY OF THE UNITED STATES IN

REGARD TO CUBA 83

IV THE DIPLOMATIC HISTORY OF THE PANAMA

CANAL 144

V FRENCH INTERVENTION IN MEXICO 193

VI THE TWO VENEZUELAN EPISODES 238

VII THE ADVANCE OF THE UNITED STATES IN

THE CARIBBEAN 261

VIII PAN AMERICANISM 292

IX THE MONROE DOCTRINE 320

INDEX 335

MAPS

SOUTH AMERICA _Frontispiece_

THE CARIBBEAN _Facing page 262_

THE UNITED STATES

AND

LATIN AMERICA

THE UNITED STATES AND LATIN AMERICA

CHAPTER I

THE REVOLT OF THE SPANISH COLONIES

The English colonies of North America renounced allegiance to their

sovereign more through fear of future oppression than on account of

burdens actually imposed. The colonies of Spain in the southern

hemisphere, on the other hand, labored for generations under the burden

of one of the most irrational and oppressive economic systems to which

any portion of the human race has ever been subjected, and remained

without serious attempt at revolution until the dethronement of their

sovereign by Napoleon left them to drift gradually, _in spite of

themselves_, as Chateaubriand expressed it, into the republican form of

government. To carry the contrast a step further, when the conditions

were ripe for independence, the English colonies offered a united

resistance, while the action of the Spanish colonies was spasmodic and

disconcerted. The North American revolution gave birth to a federal

republic, that of the South to a number of separate and independent

republics, whose relations with one another have at times been far from

amicable. The causes for these striking differences are to be explained

not alone by race psychology, but by a comparison of the English and

Spanish colonial systems and of the two revolutions as well. The history

of the English colonies and of their revolt has been pretty well

exploited, but information in regard to the Spanish-American revolution

and its causes, although the sources are abundant, is not easily

accessible to English-speaking people.

By virtue of the celebrated Bull of Pope Alexander VI, the

Spanish-American colonies were looked upon as possessions of the crown,

and not as colonies of Spain. Their affairs were regulated by the king,

with the assistance of a board called the Council of the Indies. This

council, which was on a footing of equality with the Council of Castile,

was established by Ferdinand as early as 1511, and was modified by

Charles V in 1524. It was to take cognizance of all ecclesiastical,

civil, military, and commercial affairs relating to the colonies. From

it proceeded the so-called Laws of the Indies, and all colonial offices

in the gift of the crown were conferred by it. In the course of time,

however, the personnel of this council became merged with that of

Castile, and for all practical purposes the colonies became dependencies

of the Spanish nation.

There were from the first establishment of Spanish rule in America, two

viceroyalties on the continent. The viceroy of New Spain ruled over

Mexico and Central America, whilst all South America subject to Spanish

control was for about two centuries under the viceroy of Peru. In

regions too remote to be under his immediate control, _audiencias_, or

courts of justice, were established, the president of the _audiencia_

being known by the title of captain-general. Thus _audiencias_ were

established at Quito in 1542, at Charcas (in modern Bolivia) in 1559, in

New Granada in 1564, in Chile in 1568, and later at Caracas and at

Buenos Aires. In 1740, New Granada was raised to the rank of a

viceroyalty, with its capital at Bogota; and in 1776 the same dignity

was conferred on Buenos Aires. There were thus on the southern continent

three viceroyalties widely separated: one on the Main, one on the

Atlantic, and one on the Pacific.

The powers of the viceroy, or captain-general, as the case might be,

were limited only by the _audiencia_, consisting of from three to five

members, always of Spanish birth, whose functions were largely advisory,

but who had the privilege of corresponding directly with the Council of

the Indies, and who in case of emergency sometimes went so far as to

depose the viceroy.

It should be borne in mind that in Spanish America the native Indian

races were not driven beyond the frontier of civilization, as they were

by the English settlers, but became, and remain to this day, an integral

part of the population. There was thus in the Spanish colonies an

unusual admixture of races. There were (1) European Spaniards; (2)

Creoles, or children born in America of Spanish parents; (3) Indians,

the indigenous race; (4) Negroes of African race; (5) Mestizos, children

of whites and Indians; (6) Mulattoes, children of whites and negroes;

and (7) Zambos, children of Indians and negroes.

The maladministration of Spain's colonies may be summarized under two

heads: (1) acts of oppression against the native Indian race, and (2)

regulations of a commercial and political character, which acted in

restraint of the economic and social development of her own offspring in

America.

Under the first head may be mentioned the _mita_, or forced labor in

mines, farms, and factories, and the _repartimiento_, or _encomienda_,

which was an allotment to Spaniards of territory including the native

inhabitants as peons or vassals. In spite of humane restrictions placed

by law upon them, these institutions degenerated into systems of fearful

oppression, which led, in 1781, to the heroic but unsuccessful efforts

of Tupac Amaru, the last of the Incas, to free the land of his fathers

from the cruel rule of the Spaniard. So deep-seated was the

dissatisfaction and so formidable the revolt, that it was not suppressed

for more than two years. The unfortunate Inca and most of his family

were cruelly put to death.

The economic and commercial restrictions imposed upon the colonies

require fuller notice. The whole object of Spain's colonial policy was

to extract gold and silver from America and to force Spanish

manufactures and products upon that country. Commerce was confined to

Spain and to Spanish vessels.

No South American could own a ship, nor could a cargo be

consigned to him; no foreigner was allowed to reside in the

country unless born in Spain; and no capital, not Spanish,

was permitted in any shape to be employed in the colonies.

Orders were given that no foreign vessel, on any pretence

whatever, should touch at a South American port. Even ships

in distress were not to be received with common hospitality,

but were ordered to be seized as prizes, and the crews

imprisoned.[1]

As late as 1816, when the United States protested against the blockade

established by General Morillo, as contrary to international law, M.

Onis, the Spanish minister, replied that the object of the blockade was

to maintain the laws of the Indies, which during the Napoleonic wars had

been somewhat relaxed, adding:

You are aware that, agreeably to those laws, no foreign

vessel was allowed to trade with the dominions of his

majesty on that continent without a special license, and

that vessels found near or evidently shaping a course

towards them were liable to confiscation as interlopers.

When, later in the year, a United States commissioner was sent to

Cartagena to reclaim American vessels so seized, the Spanish viceroy

gave him to understand that he did not pretend to be acquainted with the

law of nations.[2]

Not only were the colonists prohibited from engaging in manufactures

which interfered with those of Spain, but restrictions were even placed

on agriculture in the interests of the Spanish producer. Thus the

cultivation of flax, hemp, and saffron was forbidden under severe

penalty; the cultivation of tobacco was not allowed; and grapes and

olives could be raised only for table use, so that oil and wine had to

be imported from Spain. Upon one occasion (in 1803) orders were sent "to

root up all the vines in certain provinces, because the Cadiz merchants

complained of a diminution in the consumption of Spanish wines."[3]

The carrying out of this commercial system in all its details was

entrusted to the _Casa de Contratacion_, or House of Trade, which

was located at Seville until 1717, when it was transferred to

Cadiz. The India House, as it was called, was established by warrant

of Queen Joanna in 1503.[4] To this house were to be brought all

merchandise for the colonies and all products from them of whatever

character. The colonial trade was thus limited to one Spanish port. The

affairs of the house were in charge of three commissioners or judges,

who had jurisdiction, civil and criminal, over all cases arising out of

the trade with America. Their authority was subordinated to no other

court or council but that of the Indies.

Not only were no foreigners allowed to go to the Spanish colonies, but

careful restrictions were placed on the movement of Spaniards to and

from America. In 1511 King Ferdinand had by a special order permitted

all subjects of Spain without distinction to go over to the Indies upon

entering their names at the India House; but in the years 1518, 1522,

1530, and 1539 several orders were passed "that no person reconciled, or

newly converted to our holy Catholic faith, from Judaism or

Mahometanism, nor the children of such, nor the children or grandsons of

any that had worn the St. Andrew's Cross of the Inquisition, or been

burnt or condemned as heretics, or for any heretical crime, either by

male or female line, might go over to the Indies, upon pain of

forfeiting all their goods, of an hundred lashes, perpetual banishment

from the Indies, and their bodies to be at the king's disposition."[5]

The commissioners might "grant passes to merchants to go over, or return

if they came from thence, including married merchants, provided they

have leave from their wives, and give 1,000 ducats security to return

within three years."[6]

There were also strict rules about passing from one province in America

to another. This could not be done without special leave from the

king.[7] "The inhabitants of the Indies may not come to Spain without

leave from the viceroys, presidents or governors of the places of their

habitation, in which they are to express the causes of their coming, and

whether it is to stay here or return."[8] "In the Indies, the

magistrates are directed to apprehend any persons they find are gone

over without leave, to imprison them till they can send them back into

Spain, upon pain of losing their employments."[9] In 1594 and 1602 it

was decreed that persons going over without leave should be sent to the

galleys for four years. In 1622 King Philip IV decreed that a person

simply going aboard a ship bound for the Indies without leave should be

immediately sent to the galleys for eight years.[10] Other decrees

equally severe were issued from time to time.

In order to keep the trade strictly under control and to properly

protect it, intercourse with the colonies was held only once a year. Two

squadrons, consisting of merchant ships and convoys under command of an

admiral and vice-admiral, made the trip each year. The fleet for New

Spain (Mexico) sailed in the spring, and that for the mainland in the

early fall. The first touched at some of the islands and then went to

Vera Cruz; the latter touched first at Cartagena and passed on thence to

Porto Bello, where the fair was held about the middle of March. This

fair was the great event of the year, and lasted forty days from the

time of the arrival of the fleet. From this point goods were distributed

by way of Panama to Peru, Chile, and even across the continent to Buenos

Aires. The gold bullion was sent in turn to this point by the viceroy of

Peru. It came in fifteen days from Potosi to Arica, thence by sea in

eight days to Callao, and in twenty days from Callao to Panama. The

viceroy of Peru was to take care to have the plate at Panama by the

middle of March. At Porto Bello it was taken aboard the galleons. About

the middle of June the galleons met the fleet from New Spain at Havana,

and from that point the two fleets with their convoys proceeded in

greater safety to Spain. Thus for two centuries all intercourse between

Spain and her colonies at one end of the line was limited at first to

Seville, and then to Cadiz; and at the other to Vera Cruz and Porto

Bello.[11] At a later period this arrangement was modified to some

extent, and Buenos Aires was made a port of entry. The reason for not

permitting trade with Buenos Aires during the earlier period was the

fear that the British and Dutch would smuggle through that port.

While the relations of the colonies with Spain were kept under the

strictest control, intercourse with foreign nations, although

absolutely prohibited under the severest penalties, could not be

entirely prevented. In speaking of Spain's restrictive policy, a British

naval officer, who was on the South American station during the

revolution, says:

Unfortunately, however, for that system, the South

Americans, notwithstanding the network of chains by which

they were enveloped, had still some sparks of humanity left,

and, in spite of all their degradation, longed earnestly for

the enjoyments suitable to their nature; and finding that

the Spaniards neither could nor would furnish them with an

adequate supply, they invited the assistance of other

nations. To this call the other nations were not slow to

listen; and, in process of time, there was established one

of the most extraordinary systems of organized smuggling

which the world ever saw. This was known under the name of

the contraband or forced trade, and was carried on in armed

vessels, well manned, and prepared to fight their way to the

coast, and to resist, as they often did with effect, the

_guarda costas_, or coast blockades of Spain. This singular

system of warlike commerce was conducted by the Dutch,

Portuguese, French, English, and latterly by the North

Americans. In this way goods to an immense value were

distributed over South America; and although the prices were

necessarily high, and the supply precarious, that taste for

the comforts and luxuries of European invention was first

encouraged, which afterwards operated so powerfully in

giving a steady and intelligible motive to the efforts of

the Patriots in their struggle with the mother-country.

Along with the goods which the contraband trade forced into

the colonies, no small portion of knowledge found entrance,

in spite of the increased exertions of the Inquisition and

church influence, aided by the redoubled vigilance of

government, who enforced every penalty with the utmost

rigor. Many foreigners, too, by means of bribes and other

arts, succeeded in getting into the country, so that the

progress of intelligence was gradually encouraged, to the

utter despair of the Spaniards, who knew no other method of

governing the colonies but that of mere brute force,

unsupported by the least shadow of opinion, or of good

will.[12]

The trade carried on by foreign interlopers grew to such alarming

proportions that before the middle of the eighteenth century Spain found

it necessary to relax the restrictions upon the private trade of her own

subjects. This led, about 1748, to the discontinuance of the annual

fleets or galleon trade.

The political administration of the country was absolutely in the hands

of Spaniards, who as a rule were not allowed to marry, acquire property,

or form any permanent ties in America. In the summary of charges against

Spain appearing in the Argentine Manifesto of 1817, one of the

specifications is, that of one hundred and sixty viceroys who had

governed in America, four natives of the country alone were numbered;

and of six hundred and two captains-general, all but fourteen had been

Spaniards.

The monopoly of Spanish trade in South America was partially surrendered

by the treaty of Utrecht, signed in 1713, at the close of the War of the

Spanish Succession. By this treaty England agreed to recognize Philip V

as king of Spain and the Indies, and in turn was granted the _assiento_,

or contract for supplying the Spanish colonies with African slaves.[13]

The importation of negroes into the Spanish possessions had been carried

on under contract from the very first. The _assiento_, which had been

previously granted to Spanish subjects, was, in 1696, granted to the

Portuguese Company of Guinea, and in 1702 to the Royal Guinea Company

of France; but in 1713 England secured this lucrative monopoly and

became the great slave-trading power of the world.

The _assiento_ of 1713, which was very carefully drawn up in 42

articles, granted to an English company the sole right of supplying

slaves to the Spanish West Indies and to South America for the period of

thirty years from May 1, 1713. By it the Queen of England undertook to

see that the company chartered by her should introduce into the Spanish

West Indies, including South America, 144,000 negroes of both sexes and

all ages within thirty years, at the rate of 4,800 a year. The company

was to pay a duty of 33-1/3 pieces of eight (dollars) for each negro

imported. In addition to the 4,800 a year, other negroes might be

imported at a duty of 16-2/3 dollars each, thus encouraging larger

importations. The negroes could be brought in either Spanish or English

vessels, manned with English or Spanish sailors, provided only no cause

of offense be given to the Catholic religion. The majority of the

negroes were to be taken to Cuba and Porto Rico, and to the ports on the

Main; but of the 4,800, the company had the right to take 1,200 to

Buenos Aires, 800 to be sold there and 400 to be carried to the

provinces up the Plata and to the kingdom of Chile. They were also

allowed to carry negroes across the isthmus from Porto Bello to Panama,

and there re-ship them to Peru. Either Englishmen or Spaniards could be

employed in the business, provided that there were not more than four or

six Englishmen in any port, and that these should be amenable to the

laws in all respects as Spanish subjects. By no means the least

remarkable provision of this treaty was that their British and Catholic

majesties were each to receive one-fourth of the profits of this

traffic.

Ships engaged in this trade were to be searched on arrival at port, and

all merchandise found on board was to be confiscated and heavy penalties

inflicted. On condition, however, that the company should not attempt

any unlawful trade, his Catholic Majesty granted them the privilege,

during thirty years, of sending annually a ship of 500 tons to the fair

at Porto Bello. The Spanish king was to be concerned one-fourth in the

profits.[14] It seems that the company stretched this privilege to the

utmost. The ship always stopped at Jamaica, took on all the goods she

could, and carried along with her five or six smaller vessels laden with

goods. When she got near Porto Bello, all her provisions were put in the

tenders and the goods these bore taken aboard. She then entered the

harbor laden down to the water's edge. Thus this single ship was made to

carry more than five or six of the largest galleons.[15]

Thirty years before the Spanish colonies began their war of

independence, the British government had entertained the idea of

revolutionizing and separating them from Spain. This idea seems to have

arisen in 1779, during the administration of Lord North, when Spain

joined France in the alliance with the American colonies against Great

Britain.[16] It was suggested at first, no doubt, as a measure of

retaliation, but was frequently agitated in later years with the avowed

object of opening up South America to British commerce. The same idea

was the basis of Miranda's scheme for the liberation of his native

land.

Francisco de Miranda[17] (1754-1816), a native of Caracas, Venezuela,

was the first Spanish-American patriot. He was with the American army

for a time during the Revolutionary War, but in what capacity is not

quite settled. It is stated by some writers that he held a commission

under LaFayette. The success of our war inspired him with the hope of

freeing his own country from Spanish control. He confided his views to

his friends in the United States, particularly to Alexander Hamilton,

"upon whom he fixed his eyes as a coadjutor in the great purpose of his

life." Shortly after Miranda had returned to his native land his schemes

were discovered. He fled to the United States, and later to England,

where he had repeated conferences with Pitt. Finding no help for his

revolutionary schemes in England, he went to the continent and traveled

through France, Germany, Turkey, and Russia. At the Russian court he was

warmly received, but was soon dismissed at the demand of the Spanish

minister. At news of the dispute between England and Spain about Nootka

Sound in 1790, he hastened to England and communicated his scheme to the

British ministry. Pitt lent a ready ear to his views as long as the

dispute lasted, with the intention of making use of him in the event of

a rupture with Spain. But when the dispute was peaceably settled,

Miranda's hopes fell to the ground and he left England. His scheme was

only temporarily abandoned, however. He considered himself to have been

ill-used by Pitt on this occasion, as he subsequently stated to Rufus

King, the American minister to England.

The French Revolution was now well under way, and the wars upon which

the republic was entering offered an attractive field for a soldier of

republican ideas. In April, 1792, Miranda went to Paris with

introductions to Petion and the leading Girondists, hoping that the

revolutionary party might help him in his plans. He was given a

commission as brigadier-general in the French army, and served in

responsible posts under Dumouriez on the eastern frontier. He conducted

the siege of Maestricht and commanded the left wing of the French army

at the disastrous battle of Neerwinden, March, 1793, in which Belgium

was reconquered by the Austrians. Dumouriez now declared against the

Convention, but his troops having refused to follow him, he went over to

the Austrians in company with the Duke of Chartres, Louis Philippe.

Miranda fell under suspicion of treason and was forced to undergo a

court-martial, but was acquitted. For some unexplained reason he was

shortly after thrown into prison. He soon secured his release, but for

several years disappears from public view. His services in behalf of the

republic received in time due recognition. His name appears on the Arc

de Triomphe in Paris in the list of the heroes of the Revolution.

In January, 1798, Miranda returned to England. As Spain was now the

close ally of France, he hoped to secure the cooperation of Great

Britain in his scheme. He also hoped to secure aid from the United

States. The people of Kentucky and Tennessee were far from satisfied

with the provisions of the Spanish treaty of 1795 in regard to the

navigation of the Mississippi River. Then, too, just at this time, war

between the United States and France seemed inevitable, on account of

the resentment by France of the Jay treaty and her treatment of the

American representatives. Washington had been called from his retirement

at Mt. Vernon to assume the post of commander-in-chief of the army,

while the active command was to be given to Hamilton. Hamilton had

expressed great interest in Miranda's projects and was a man of known

ambition. His appointment, therefore, as the virtual commander-in-chief

of the American army made Miranda hopeful of his cooperation.

Mr. King, the American minister at London, entered heartily into the

plans of General Miranda, and his correspondence on that subject, during

the year 1798, with his government and with Hamilton is quite

voluminous.[18] For a time it seemed as if Great Britain and the United

States would cooperate for the purpose of revolutionizing Spanish

America. The plan, as entertained by Miranda and Hamilton, was for

England to supply the naval force and the United States the land forces.

Miranda believed that six or eight vessels of the line and four or five

thousand troops would be sufficient,[19] though Hamilton thought it

would require ten thousand troops. England's participation in the scheme

depended upon the relations between France and Spain. Mr. King wrote to

his government, February 26, 1798:

Two points have within a fortnight been settled in the

English cabinet respecting South America. If Spain is able

to prevent the overthrow of her present government and to

escape being brought under the entire control of France,

England (between whom and Spain, notwithstanding the war, a

certain understanding appears to exist) will at present

engage in no scheme to deprive Spain of her possessions in

South America. But if, as appears probable, the army

destined against Portugal, and which will march through

Spain, or any other means which may be employed by France,

shall overthrow the Spanish government, and thereby place

the resources of Spain and of her colonies at the disposal

of France, England will immediately commence the execution

of a plan long since digested and prepared for the complete

independence of South America. If England engages in this

plan, she will at Philadelphia propose to the United States

to cooperate in its execution, Miranda will be detained

here, under one pretense or another, until events shall

decide the conduct of England.[20]

England's policy in regard to South America for the next twenty years

substantially confirmed the interpretation of her motives here given by

Mr. King.

During the summer of 1798 Mr. King had several conferences with the

British ministry in regard to the Spanish-American question, but it was

always understood that they were personal and wholly unauthorized. What

occurred at these interviews was, of course, always communicated to the

American government, but as they were unofficial and communicated merely

in the nature of information, the State Department preferred to keep the

matter on the same basis and did not refer to the matter in its

dispatches to Mr. King. This caused him no little annoyance.[21] In the

same way no notice was taken of General Miranda's letter to President

Adams.

Hamilton, however, was very frank in the expression of his views both to

General Miranda and to Mr. King. Under date of August 22, 1798, he wrote

to the latter:

I have received several letters from General Miranda. I have

written answers to some of them, which I send you to deliver

or not, according to your estimate of what is passing in the

scenes where you are. Should you deem it expedient to

suppress my letter, you may do it and say as much as you

think fit on my part in the nature of a communication

through you. With regard to the enterprise in question, I

wish it much to be undertaken, but I should be glad that the

principal agency was in the United States--they to furnish

the whole land force necessary. The command in this case

would very naturally fall upon me, and I hope I should

disappoint no favorable anticipation.

The United States, however, succeeded in coming to an understanding with

France, while England was unwilling to deal such a serious blow to Spain

as long as there was a chance of arraying her against Napoleon. The

communication of the views of the British government at Philadelphia, to

which Mr. King referred as a preliminary, was never made. Miranda's

hopes finally fell through at the reestablishment of peace in Europe by

the treaty of Amiens, which lasted until 1803. He lingered in Europe

some time longer, until, wearied out by years of fruitless negotiation

with the British government, he, for the time being, gave up all hope

of success in that quarter and returned once more to the United States.

Arriving in New York from England in November, 1805, Miranda proceeded

to lay his cause once more before Mr. King, who had so warmly befriended

him in London, and to solicit his cooperation in fitting out an

expedition for South America. While expressing his full sympathy with

the cause, Mr. King stated emphatically that he could render him no

assistance, nor could any individuals safely do so, without the

countenance of the government. He, therefore, advised Miranda to go to

Washington and lay his plans before the administration. This Miranda

did. He was admitted to informal conferences both with President

Jefferson and Secretary of State Madison. Upon his return to New York he

represented to those interested in his schemes that he had secured from

the government a secret sanction of his project, and that the

administration, though unwilling to take the initiative, would support

the undertaking so soon as the standard of revolution should once have

been raised on the Spanish Main. Miranda's chief supporter was Colonel

Smith, surveyor of the port of New York, whose influence as a public

official in close touch with the administration was decisive in

persuading many adventurous spirits to join the expedition with the

belief that it was really secretly backed by the government of the

United States.

Miranda left New York in the early part of February, 1806, in the

_Leander_, with an imperfectly equipped force of about 200 men, most of

whom were commissioned as officers and promised commands in the South

American army, which was expected to spring from the soil at the magic

touch of Miranda's step upon the shores of his native land. The ship

proceeded to Jacquemel, San Domingo, where Miranda expected to get the

necessary supplies and reinforcements. Here disappointments awaited him,

disputes with the ship's captain ensued, and over a month was

fruitlessly spent, while the Spanish authorities on the Main had time to

put themselves on the alert. It was not until the last of April that the

expedition, reinforced by two schooners, appeared off the coast of

Venezuela near Porto Cabello. They were attacked by two Spanish vessels,

which captured the schooners with about sixty men and large stores,

while the _Leander_ ignominiously took to flight.

Miranda then sailed for Barbados, where he solicited aid from the

British admiral, Lord Cochrane, in command on the West Indian station.

Lord Cochrane, without definite instructions from his government, but

acquainted with its general policy in regard to South America, and

knowing of the close relations in which Miranda had stood for years with

the British ministry, decided to assist him in landing. With this

understanding he signed with Miranda an agreement to the effect that in

the event of the success of the expedition, Great Britain should always

be held on a footing with the most favored nation, and that British

ships should receive a deduction of ten per cent. upon duties paid by

all other nations, except the United States.[22] On the twentieth of

June, the expedition left Barbados under convoy of a part of Admiral

Cochrane's squadron, and on August 2, 1806, effected a landing near

Coro, Venezuela. They easily took possession of the town, the unarmed

inhabitants fleeing before them. Here Miranda remained about ten days,

issuing proclamations and vainly waiting for the natives to join him.

His position, meanwhile, was becoming unsafe, so he abandoned it and

took possession of the little island of Aruba off the coast. Lord

Cochrane, seeing that the expedition was a failure, and not wishing

further to compromise his government, sent no reinforcements and finally

ordered the withdrawal of the ships that had accompanied the expedition.

Miranda was offered a convoy back to Trinidad, which he accepted,

leaving Aruba, September 27, 1806. At Trinidad the members of the

expedition dispersed.[23]

The Americans who had taken part in the expedition and survived were

prosecuted in the United States courts for violation of the neutrality

laws. They claimed that they had enlisted in the undertaking with the

connivance of the government at Washington. Jefferson's enemies made

great political capital of the affair. Members of the cabinet were

summoned as witnesses, but refused to appear. Privately Jefferson and

Madison both denied most emphatically having in any way committed the

government to Miranda's undertaking, or having acted in any way in

disregard of our obligations to Spain.[24]

Aside from accomplishing nothing, the expedition of 1806 was a great

injury to Miranda's cause. He himself lost prestige as a military leader

and brought his character into question as having misrepresented his

connection both with the British and United States governments.

However, upon the occupation of Spain by Napoleon in 1808, Miranda again

hastened to England and urged upon the ministry the claims of his

country, in whose interests he had now been laboring incessantly as an

exile for more than twenty years. We cannot but admire his tenacity of

purpose in the face of the most disheartening failures.

Not only did the British government lend its encouragement, through Lord

Cochrane, to the filibustering expedition from the United States with

which Miranda hoped to revolutionize Venezuela, but about the same time

it sent an expedition against the provinces of the Plate. This attack,

like the assistance given to Miranda, was ill-timed and not properly

followed up. The policy seems to have been outlined by Pitt, but was put

into execution after his death by the short-lived ministry of Grenville

and Fox. The government of the Duke of Portland, which succeeded after a

few months, and in which Castlereagh and Canning were the most

conspicuous figures, did not deem it expedient to follow up the

undertaking.[25] In fact, the fate of the expedition was already sealed

when Portland came into power.

The victory of Trafalgar had given the English control of the Atlantic.

A force of some 6,000 men was dispatched to the South Atlantic without

its destination being known. It proceeded to Rio Janeiro, Portugal then

being in alliance with England. The viceroy of the Plate became alarmed

and prepared to defend Montevideo, which he thought would be the first

point of attack. The expedition, however, passed by and proceeded to the

Cape of Good Hope, which it wrested from the Dutch. In 1806 a dash was

made from the Cape for the river Plate. Sir Home Popham commanded the

fleet, and General Beresford the land force, which amounted to 1,635

men. On June 6 the squadron arrived at the mouth of the Plate. The ships

had some difficulty in ascending the river, but on the 25th they came to

anchor at a point fifteen miles below Buenos Aires. The city was

captured with little or no resistance, the inhabitants having been led

to believe that the British had come to liberate them. The contents of

the public treasury were handed over to the invaders. The inhabitants

were required to swear allegiance to George III, private property was

respected, the free exercise of their religion was allowed, and all

officials who took the oath were continued in office. When Beresford

refused to proclaim the independence of the province, or to give any

assurance for their future independence, the inhabitants, who had now

learned how insignificant the invading force really was, began to

prepare for resistance. A leader was readily found in the person of

Jacques Liniers, a Frenchman, who had been for thirty years in the

service of Spain. He and Juan Martin de Puyrredon began an organized

movement for the expulsion of the English. On the 12th of August,

Beresford, who had remained all this time without reinforcements, was

compelled to surrender. Troops ordered to his support from the Cape did

not arrive until later.

Sobremonte, the viceroy, had deserted Buenos Aires and established

himself at Montevideo. The people of Buenos Aires, therefore, deposed

him and chose Liniers in his place.

During the fall other English reinforcements arrived, and in January,

1807, Montevideo was taken by assault. As soon as the defeat of

Beresford was known, General Whitelocke was sent to take command of the

united English forces of the Plate, now some twelve thousand in number.

He arrived in the spring. The reconquest of Buenos Aires now seemed an

easy matter. It had been taken in the first instance by sixteen hundred

men; there were now ten thousand available. On June 28 the British

landed at the small port of Ensenada, forty-eight miles below Buenos

Aires. The fighting continued on the outskirts of the city in a

desultory manner and without any decisive action for several days. But

finally, owing to the bad generalship and incompetency of Whitelocke,

his troops got into such a muddle that half the force was captured or

disabled. On July 6, Liniers decided to send a flag of truce with the

proposal to surrender all the English prisoners, including those taken

with Beresford, provided Whitelocke would evacuate the territory of

Buenos Aires. One of Liniers' associates, Alzaga, insisted that the

terms of surrender should include Montevideo. This demand seemed

preposterous, but the clause was finally inserted, and to their surprise

agreed to, so complete was the demoralization of the English. On July 7

the terms of capitulation were signed.[26] Thus through a lack of

decision in the cabinet and a display of incapacity in the field,

without parallel in British annals, the empire of the Plate was

lost.[27]

With Napoleon's invasion of Spain in 1808, the Spanish-American

question came to the front once more. Miranda returned to London and was

detained there by the cabinet, as before by Pitt, with a view to using

him if occasion should require. At the same time Castlereagh, now

Foreign Secretary, had other solutions of the question in view. It was

proposed, and the matter seriously discussed in the cabinet, to alienate

the colonies from Spain, if possible, without revolution; and, instead

of establishing republics according to Miranda's plans, to unite them

all under a prince of the House of Bourbon. Louis Philippe, Duke of

Orleans, was suggested as the most suitable person for the new crown.

Some thirty years prior to this, immediately upon the recognition by

Spain of the independence of the United States, Count de Aranda had

advised Charles III to forestall the movement for independence, which

must inevitably come in his own provinces, by establishing among them

three great empires--one in Mexico, one in Peru, and one on the

Main--each to be ruled by a prince of the royal family of Spain.[28]

Chateaubriand brought forward a similar plan several years later at the

Congress of Verona. The present scheme was suggested by General

Dumouriez in the interests of his friend, the Duke of Orleans. Several

memorials on the subject, both by Dumouriez and the duke, were presented

to the British government in 1807 and 1808.[29]

Napoleon's invasion of Spain constitutes at once the most contemptible

and the most disastrous chapter in his career. In 1807, under the terms

of an agreement with Godoy, the unworthy favorite of the queen and the

virtual ruler of Spain, a French army was introduced into the kingdom

for the nominal purpose of punishing Portugal for her refusal to join

the continental system. The Portuguese royal family, fully appreciating

the danger in which they stood, fled to America and founded the empire

of Brazil, which in 1815 was declared independent of Portugal. The

Spanish rulers attempted to follow their example, but their intended

flight became known and they were prevented by the populace from leaving

the capital. In the meantime a disgraceful quarrel having arisen between

the old king, Charles IV, and Prince Ferdinand, Napoleon, whose troops

were now firmly established in Spain, stepped in as arbiter between

father and son and summoned them both to meet him on the northern

frontier. Having purposely lingered in France beyond the appointed time,

he succeeded in enticing them over the border to Bayonne, where he

compelled both to renounce forever the crown of Spain and the Indies,

which he forthwith bestowed upon his brother Joseph. When the truth

dawned upon them, the Spanish nation rose to a man. Napoleon had

unwittingly aroused the latent principle of nationality; he had put into

action a force which was new and one which the statesmen of Europe had

hitherto left out of account, but which was to prove the most potent

factor in the new epoch of political history introduced by the French

Revolution.

Provisional juntas were rapidly organized in the various provinces of

the kingdom of Spain and affairs administered in the name of Ferdinand

VII. The Junta, or as it is better known, the Regency of Cadiz, rapidly

gained a position of national importance and became the chief executive

body of the Spanish nation. The American provinces, which had long been

restive under Spanish rule, now claimed the same right of

self-government that the provinces of the Peninsula had assumed, and

began to depose the Spanish governors and to set up juntas of their own,

still acting in the name of Ferdinand VII. The Americans claimed that

they were not politically a part of Spain, but connected only through

the sovereign, and that with the removal of the sovereign the connection

ceased. The Regency of Cadiz, on the other hand, maintained that the

colonies were integral parts of Spain, and claimed, therefore, the right

to govern them in the absence of the sovereign.

The first throes of revolution were felt in 1809, almost simultaneously

in Upper Peru, Quito, and Mexico. These movements were quickly

suppressed with great cruelty. In the year 1810 the revolution opened

upon a vast scale. All the Spanish colonies on the mainland, with the

exception of Lower Peru, revolted at the same time and proclaimed their

independence of Spain, although still professing allegiance to Ferdinand

VII, the dethroned king.

The colonial authorities were deposed in most cases by force of public

opinion and without violence. The revolution was municipal in character,

that is to say, the _cabildos_, or town councils, the only popularly

constituted political bodies in the colonies, assumed the initiative in

the work of revolution and named the juntas. The junta of the capital

city in each province was usually recognized as the chief executive body

for that province, and assumed for the time being all the functions of

government. National conventions were then called in many cases to

decide upon the form of government. These in most cases entrusted the

executive power to regencies or triumvirates, almost all of which

rapidly gave way to military dictatorships.

The Regency of Cadiz had anticipated trouble from the colonies and had

recognized their rights as freemen by inviting them to send deputies to

the national Cortes, but at the same time had abridged those rights by

allowing them only a very limited representation, absurdly out of

proportion to their population and commercial importance. Upon the

establishment of the provisional governments or juntas in the colonies,

the Regency refused them the freedom of trade that had been promised,

declined the proffered mediation of England, and proceeded to stigmatize

the Americans as rebels and to declare them guilty of high treason,

although they had been guilty only of the same conduct that the

Spaniards themselves were pursuing at home.

Venezuela then (1811) declared herself independent of both the Spanish

nation and of the Spanish monarch, and adopted a republican

constitution. The promulgation of the Spanish constitution of 1812

further encouraged the spirit of independence in the colonies, but when

Ferdinand was restored in 1814, the colonies were still governed in his

name, for the revolution of Venezuela, which alone had declared for

independence, had been crushed out. Had Ferdinand acted with any

moderation or judgment, his American possessions would have been saved

to his crown. But the refusal of the colonies, which had now enjoyed

practical self-government for several years, to take upon them without

conditions the yoke of absolute authority, was met with the proclamation

of a war of reconquest. Reconciliation was thereafter no longer

possible, and independence only a question of time. By the close of 1815

the revolution had been put down in all the provinces except La Plata.

There it was never suppressed. For this reason we shall first trace

rapidly the course of the revolution in the south, of which San Martin

was the directing power.

Jose de San Martin was born in 1778 in Paraguay, his father being the

governor of Misiones. When eight years of age, his family went to Spain

and he was entered as a pupil in the Seminary of Nobles at Madrid. At

the age of twelve, he joined a regiment as cadet and saw his first

service in Africa. He served in the Spanish army for more than twenty

years, and won promotion as well as special distinction for bravery. In

the battle of Baylen, where a detachment of Napoleon's disciplined

troops was beaten by an army of recruits inspired by patriotism, San

Martin, then a captain, won a gold medal and a commission as

lieutenant-colonel for his conduct. Hearing of the struggle for liberty

in his native land, he resigned his commission and returned to America.

He was almost unknown personally, but his reputation as a brave soldier

and a skilful tactician procured for him immediate employment. At this

time the Argentine Republic had two armies in the field, the one

operating near at home against the Portuguese in Uruguay and the Spanish

in Montevideo, and the other in Upper Peru (Bolivia) against the forces

sent by the viceroy of Peru to suppress the Argentine revolution. San

Martin was soon given the command of this army in the north, succeeding

General Belgrano. He soon placed his army in an excellent state of

discipline and put a check to the advances of the Peruvian army.[30]

On May 16, 1814, the Argentine naval force, under command of an Irishman

named Brown, defeated and almost entirely destroyed the Spanish squadron

stationed at Montevideo, and that city soon after surrendered to the

besieging army of Alvear, San Martin's old comrade in the Spanish army.

Alvear, whose political influence was much greater than San Martin's,

now aspired to the conquest of Peru, and therefore desired the command

in the north. This San Martin willingly relinquished to him. He had

other plans in mind, and the state of his health demanded rest. Upper

Peru had been the high-road from Peru to Buenos Aires in times of peace,

and was, therefore, naturally looked upon as the line of advance for the

liberating army. San Martin, however, after a careful study of the

question, had become convinced that this was not the strategic line of

approach, that the Argentine Republic would never succeed in conquering

Peru from this quarter. His idea was to carry the war to the west, to

cross the Andes, occupy Chile, and, having secured a naval base there,

to attack Peru from the coast, continuing military operations in the

north merely as a diversion. The success of this plan depended upon the

performance of two apparently impossible tasks--the passage of the Andes

and the creation of a navy on the Pacific. San Martin was by far too

shrewd a man to advocate such an undertaking before maturing his plans.

He, therefore, confided it only to a few of his intimate friends, and,

taking advantage of his ill health, asked, as a favor for himself, the

government of the obscure province of Cuyo, where from its capital of

Mendoza he could place himself in communication with the Chilean

patriots.

On August 10, 1814, San Martin was appointed governor of Cuyo, and at

once devoted himself to the development of the plans which led to the

emancipation of half a continent and gave him his place in the world's

history. The revolutionary movement in Chile had just been crushed out.

It was begun in 1810 and the general course of events had been somewhat

similar to the Argentine movement, but it had fallen a victim first to

disputes between the Patriot leaders and finally to the troops of the

viceroy of Peru. It would require more space than we can give to trace

the varying fortunes of the cause in Chile through the stirring events

that marked the leadership of Dr. Rosas, of the Carrera brothers, and of

Bernardo O'Higgins. After the final collapse, O'Higgins, with a number

of other Patriots, fled over the Andes to Mendoza and readily entered

into the plans of San Martin. It took the latter two years to organize

and equip an army and to convince the government of Buenos Aires of the

practicability of his plan.

At length, on January 17, 1817, he began the passage of the Andes with

about 5,000 men, 1,600 horses, and 9,000 mules, the latter carrying the

field artillery, ammunition, and provisions. The summit of the Uspallata

Pass is 12,700 feet above the sea-level, 5,000 feet higher than the

Great St. Bernard, by which Napoleon led his army over the Alps. In many

other respects San Martin's achievement was more remarkable. Each piece

of artillery had to be carried suspended on a pole between two mules,

or, where the road was particularly dangerous, dragged by ropes. There

were chasms that could be crossed only by cable bridges. The march over

the Andes occupied three weeks. Both men and animals suffered greatly

from _soroche_, the illness caused by rarefied atmosphere.

At the foot of the mountain, at Chacabuco, the vanguard of San Martin's

army defeated a body of 4,000 Royalists, and thus opened the road to

Santiago, which San Martin entered February 14, 1817. The Chileans chose

him Supreme Director of their government, but he declined the office,

and O'Higgins was chosen.

San Martin's great object was to crush the colonial power of Spain in

its stronghold, Peru. Having by the successful passage of the Andes and

the victory of Chacabuco in a measure justified his plan of campaign, he

returned to Buenos Aires for reinforcements. The Royalists meanwhile

retreated to the south. On February 18, 1818, the independence of Chile

was proclaimed. A month later the Patriots were surprised at

Cancha-Rayada and almost routed, but within two weeks the army was again

ready for action, and on April 5, 1818, encountered the Royalists at

Maipo. This battle was a complete victory for the Patriots and decided

the fate of Chile. Only one or two fortresses in the south were now held

for Spain. Five days after the battle of Maipo, San Martin returned once

more to Buenos Aires and began organizing an expedition for the

liberation of Peru. Puyrredon, now Supreme Director, supported his

undertaking.

While San Martin was soliciting aid from the Argentine Republic, the

Chileans were not idle. They saw that the only way of insuring their

independence was by the creation of a navy. Through its agent in London,

the Chilean government secured the services of Lord Cochrane, an English

naval officer of great distinction and remarkable talents, who by a

curious turn of fortune had been brought into unmerited disgrace and

dismissed from the British service.[31] He reached Valparaiso in

November and hoisted his flag on board the _O'Higgins_, December 22,

1818. During the course of the next year, Cochrane made two attempts to

take Callao, the seaport of Peru, but without success beyond harassing

the enemy in some of the smaller coast towns. In February, 1820, by a

brilliant move, he captured Valdivia, a strongly fortified town still

held by the Spaniards in southern Chile.

San Martin returned to Chile in January, 1820, and began to assemble at

Valparaiso the army destined for the invasion of Peru. Of the 5,000 men,

two-thirds were from Buenos Aires, while nearly all of the officers were

Argentine or European volunteers. Of 65 foreign officers, 37 were

British and 3 were from the United States. There were, besides, 30

English officers in the Chilean navy. The expedition sailed on August

21, 1820, on board the fleet commanded by Cochrane. San Martin landed

his army at Pisco, to the south of Lima, and sent an expedition into the

interior under General Arenales, who had served the Patriots for years

in Upper Peru. In October, San Martin reembarked his troops and landed

them again at Huacho, a point seventy miles north of Lima. Meanwhile the

Spanish squadron, completely demoralized by the appearance on the

Pacific of Lord Cochrane, whose daring exploits were well known, was

lying under the guns of Callao Castle. On the night of November 5, 1820,

Lord Cochrane led a force of volunteers, consisting of 180 seamen and

100 marines, in open boats right under the batteries of Callao,

surprised and overpowered the crew of the _Esmeralda_, the largest

Spanish frigate, and, cutting her loose, carried her off to his own

squadron.

After Cochrane's exploit at Callao, the moral effect of which was very

great, he urged upon San Martin an immediate advance upon Lima, but San

Martin had two campaigns before him, the one military, the other

political. On first landing at Pisco he had issued an order to his army

in which he said, "Remember that you are come not to conquer, but to

liberate a people; the Peruvians are our brothers." And in spite of the

impatience and restlessness of his officers, he steadily adhered to his

plan, to the no small loss of his military prestige and ultimately to

his retirement from the scene of activity. His purpose was by the

presence of the liberating army to give the people of Peru a chance to

rise and throw off the yoke of Spain. To this end he scattered

proclamations and addresses of a revolutionary character broadcast

through the land and quietly awaited results. The contest in Peru, he

said, was not a war of conquest and glory, but entirely of opinion; it

was a war of new and liberal principles against prejudice, bigotry, and

tyranny.

People ask why I don't march to Lima at once; so I might,

and instantly would, were it suitable to my views, which it

is not. I do not want military renown; I have no ambition to

be the conqueror of Peru; I want solely to liberate the

country from oppression. Of what use would Lima be to me if

the inhabitants were hostile in political sentiment? How

could the cause of independence be advanced by my holding

Lima, or even the whole country, in military possession? Far

different are my views. I wish to have all men thinking with

me, and do not choose to advance a step beyond the gradual

march of public opinion. The capital is now ripe for

declaring its sentiments, and I shall give them the

opportunity to do so in safety. It was in sure expectation

of this movement that I have hitherto deferred advancing;

and to those who know the full extent of the means which

have been put in action, a sufficient explanation is

afforded of all the delays that have taken place. I have

been gaining, indeed, day by day, fresh allies in the hearts

of the people, the only certain allies in such a war. In the

secondary point of military strength, I have been, from the

same causes, equally successful in augmenting and improving

the liberating army; while that of the Spaniards has been

wasted by want and desertion. The country has now become

sensible of its true interests, and it is right the

inhabitants should have the means of expressing what they

think. Public opinion is an engine newly introduced into

this country; the Spaniards, who are utterly incapable of

directing it, have prohibited its use; but they shall now

experience its strength and importance.[32]

The campaign of Arenales in the interior was successful. In the presence

of the liberating army, the people everywhere rose in revolt. San

Martin's method of conducting the campaign was the correct one. Public

opinion was soon aroused in the capital itself, and the Royalists

finally decided to evacuate Lima. The viceroy retired with his forces to

Cuzco in the highlands. In response to an invitation from the city

authorities, the Patriots entered Lima July 6, 1821. San Martin himself

entered without ceremony after dark a few days later. The independence

of Peru was proclaimed July 28 with imposing ceremonies in the great

square of Lima. San Martin was proclaimed Protector of Peru. He

proceeded to organize a civil government, and established the celebrated

_Order of the Sun_, distinctively aristocratic in character.

San Martin had played a great part thus far, but he had reached the

zenith of his influence and power. Dissensions soon arose. The task he

had undertaken was difficult in the extreme. It was much easier to

acquire power than to use it. At the time of the evacuation of Lima by

the Spaniards, he said to Captain Hall:

For the last ten years I have been unremittingly employed

against the Spaniards; or rather in favor of this country,

for I am not against any one who is not hostile to the cause

of independence. All I wish is that this country should be

managed by itself, and by itself alone. As to the manner in

which it is to be governed, that belongs not at all to me. I

propose simply to give the people the means of declaring

themselves independent, and of establishing a suitable form

of government; after which I shall consider I have done

enough and leave them.[33]

When the time came he kept his word.

While San Martin was leading the army of liberation from the Argentine

Republic to Chile, and from Chile to Peru, Simon Bolivar, the liberator

of the north, was pursuing his chequered career in Venezuela and

Colombia, unfurling the standard of revolution wherever he could get a

foothold. He was a man, in every respect, the opposite of San Martin,

fiery, impetuous, wholly given over to personal ambition, neither a

statesman nor a soldier, but one of the greatest revolutionary leaders

of any age or country. His ignorance of military affairs led him into

undertakings from which an experienced soldier would have held back, but

his indomitable pluck carried him safely through all calamities, and his

wonderful enthusiasm fired his followers even in the midst of disaster.

This remarkable man, whose reputation in the new world stands second to

that of Washington alone, was, like Miranda, a native of Caracas. Sprung

from a family of wealth and influence he had, like most young South

Americans of his class, received his education abroad, and had for

several years led a dissipated life in Paris. At first he held himself

aloof from the revolutionary leaders, but after the accomplishment of

the revolution of Caracas, April 19, 1810, he was persuaded to join the

Patriot cause, and was sent to London to solicit assistance from Great

Britain.[34]

The junta of Caracas, like those subsequently formed in the south,

professed to act in the name of Ferdinand VII, and fearing the influence

of Miranda, then in London, whose advocacy of absolute independence had

been open and avowed, they instructed Bolivar and their other agents not

to allow him to come to Venezuela. Miranda came in spite of them,

however, under an assumed name, and was everywhere received with

enthusiasm. Under his influence a congress was elected which, on July 5,

1811, declared Venezuela a republic, free and independent of all foreign

dominion. Miranda was appointed Director. This was the first South

American declaration of independence. The formal independence of the

Argentine Republic was not declared until July 9, 1816, although the

country had been self-governing for several years.

The Patriot cause was ruined, however, by the earthquake of March 25,

1812, which almost destroyed the city of Caracas and several towns of

importance. Twenty thousand people are supposed to have perished. As the

disaster occurred on Holy Thursday, the clergy were not slow to turn it

to political account and to persuade the people that it was a direct

chastisement of Heaven upon them for their rebellion against Spain. The

cause of the Patriots steadily lost ground until the fall of Porto

Cabello, through the inefficiency of Bolivar, caused its complete

collapse. Miranda was forced to sign with Monteverde the treaty of

Vittoria, July 26, 1812, on the basis of complete submission and a

general amnesty. It is hardly necessary to add that the Spanish general

did not abide by the terms of the capitulation. Miranda himself was

detained by Bolivar, as he was on the point of embarking for England,

accused of having received bribes from the Spaniards and of being

unwilling to share the fate of his followers, and treacherously handed

over to the Spaniards. He was sent to Spain and after languishing for

three years in a dungeon at Cadiz, died July 14, 1816. His fate was a

sad blot upon the reputation of Bolivar.

The revolution in New Granada, which had been inaugurated July 20, 1810,

was still holding out and thither Bolivar proceeded to offer his

services to the Patriots of that province. As soon as he had firmly

established himself in influence and power, he persuaded the government

that their only safety lay in the reconquest of Venezuela. He was

provided with troops, and in May, 1813 crossed the frontier and took

several important cities. He now assumed a new attitude and became a

self-appointed dictator. He proclaimed a war of extermination against

Spaniards and adopted a new system of dates: "3d year of Independence

and 1st of the War to the Death." He entered Caracas in triumph August

6, 1813. He proclaimed himself dictator with the title of Liberator.

Meanwhile Marino, another Patriot leader, had landed in the eastern part

of Venezuela near Cumana and declared himself dictator. There were thus

two dictators and no cordiality between them. Before they could come to

an agreement the enemy had recovered their position. In December, 1814,

the last Patriot force was defeated.

Bolivar and Marino retired once more to New Granada. Bolivar was made

captain-general of the forces of New Granada, his title of Liberator was

recognized, and another, that of Illustrious Pacificator, bestowed upon

him. A second time he undertook the conquest of Venezuela from the west.

Dissensions soon arose between Bolivar and the other leaders. He was

refused reinforcements and foolishly marched against the Patriot

garrison of Cartagena. He was now forced to give up his command, and

embarked for Jamaica, May, 1815.

Meanwhile Ferdinand had been restored to the throne of Spain, and an

army of 10,000 men, commanded by Marshal Morillo, the ablest Spanish

general of the time, had been sent to reduce the provinces on the Main.

This expedition reached Cumana in April, 1815, and before the end of the

year all the colonies, with the exception of the provinces of the River

Plate, were reduced to submission.

Far from giving up hope, however, Bolivar proceeded to Haiti, and from

that island, in May, 1816, made a descent upon the eastern part of

Venezuela, but was routed by the Spaniards in July, and soon returned to

Haiti. A few of the Patriots still kept the field, and towards the close

of the year Bolivar's partisans secured his recall. On December 21 he

left Haiti with a second expedition for the relief of his native land.

He determined now to direct all his efforts, not as hitherto, to the

support of the Patriot cause in the capital, but to the holding of the

great plains of the Orinoco. With this territory as a base, he carried

on, during the year 1817, in conjunction with the Llanero horsemen of

General Paez, a desperate struggle with the Spaniards. When the rainy

season of 1818 began, Bolivar's army had been cut almost to pieces, he

had lost prestige as a general, and his civil authority amounted to

nothing. Only the cavalry of Paez maintained the Patriot cause. Still

the position of the Spaniards was not much better. Morillo had 12,000

men scattered about, but neither money, arms, nor supplies. He reported

to the viceroy of Peru: "Twelve pitched battles, in which the best

officers and troops of the enemy have fallen, have not lowered their

pride or lessened the vigor of their attacks upon us."

In February, 1819, the second Congress of Venezuela convened at

Angostura. The Dictator resigned, but was unanimously elected President

and given absolute power in all provinces which were the actual theater

of war. The army was reorganized by the accession of foreign troops, in

particular the British legion, consisting of 2,000 well equipped men,

which achieved much of the success of the next year. Bolivar now

conceived the idea of crossing the Cordillera and reconquering New

Granada. General Paez was to attract the attention of Morillo on the

plains in front, and a demonstration was to be made on the coast near

Caracas, while Bolivar marched to the west. This movement changed the

whole face of affairs and had a similar effect to the passage of the

Andes by San Martin. New Granada was won by the battle of Boyaca, August

7, 1819. Morillo was now isolated in Venezuela. In December, 1819, a

congress of delegates from Venezuela and New Granada met and decreed the

union of the two provinces in the Republic of Colombia. Bolivar was

named provisional President. An armistice was signed by Bolivar and

Morillo in November, 1820, which gave the Patriots breathing time. The

Spanish troops remaining in Venezuela were defeated by Bolivar in the

battle of Carabobo, June 23, 1821. Only a few fortresses on the coast

were still held by the Spaniards.

Bolivar entered Caracas once more in triumph and tendered his

resignation, an act always considered by him necessary for giving the

proper dramatic setting to such occasions. Congress took no notice of

it, but drew up a constitution providing for a limited presidential term

of four years. The Liberator, "as he feared," was elected President. He

repeated his resignation, but added that he would yield if Congress

persisted. Congress did persist.

After the battle of Boyaca, Bolivar had sent General Sucre by sea to

Guayaquil, nominally to aid the new state against the Royalists, but in

reality to induce it to join the Republic of Colombia. Sucre met with

reverses, and had to call on San Martin for assistance from Peru.

Meanwhile Bolivar was advancing by land. On July 11, 1822, he entered

Guayaquil in triumph, and two days later, on his own responsibility,

announced its incorporation with Colombia. The junta resigned and took

refuge on board the Peruvian squadron in the harbor. On the 25th San

Martin arrived by sea, and Bolivar sent two of his aides to welcome him

"on Colombian soil." On the following day San Martin went ashore and he

and Bolivar met for the first and last time. They had two private

interviews, after which San Martin sent his baggage aboard his ship and

announced that he would sail after attending the ball to be given that

night in his honor. At the public banquet that evening Bolivar rose and

proposed a toast: "To the two greatest men of South America--General San

Martin and myself." San Martin also proposed a toast: "To the speedy

conclusion of the war; to the organization of the different republics of

the continent; and to the health of the Liberator of Colombia"--words

which well contrasted the personal and political aims of the two men.

San Martin and Bolivar had been unable to agree upon any plan for the

expulsion of the Spaniards from the highlands of Peru. The self-denying

patriot gave way before the man of ambition. To O'Higgins he wrote: "The

Liberator is not the man we took him to be."

Upon his return to Peru, San Martin wrote to Bolivar: "My decision is

irrevocable. I have convened the first Congress of Peru; the day after

its installation I shall leave for Chile, convinced that my presence is

the only obstacle which keeps you from coming to Peru with your army."

On the 20th of September, 1822, he laid his resignation before the

Congress, and issued an address to the nation. "The presence of a

fortunate soldier," he said, "however disinterested he may be, is

dangerous to a newly founded state. I have proclaimed the independence

of Peru. I have ceased to be a public man." These words, whether

intentionally so or not, were prophetic of Bolivar's subsequent career.

San Martin wrote to O'Higgins: "I am tired of hearing them call me

tyrant, that I wish to make myself king, emperor, the devil. On the

other hand, my health is broken, this climate is killing me. My youth

was sacrificed to the service of Spain; my manhood to my own country. I

think I have now the right to dispose of my old age."

Bolivar's jealousy of San Martin prolonged the war, which might have

been brought to a close in a few months, for nearly three years. After

the withdrawal of San Martin, Bolivar became Dictator of Peru. On

December 9, 1824, was fought the last battle for South American

independence. On the little plain of Ayacucho, 11,600 feet above the

sea, General Sucre defeated and captured the forces of the viceroy.

Upper Peru was organized as a separate republic, with the name of

Bolivia.

Bolivar had been proclaimed President of Peru for life, but the

unpopularity of this measure led him to leave the country in 1826, never

to return. That same year he summoned the Congress of Panama, but his

plans for the union of South America in one republic failed. San

Martin's idea finally triumphed. In 1829 Venezuela separated itself from

Colombia and passed a decree of perpetual banishment against Bolivar.

In April, 1830, through pressure of public opinion, Bolivar resigned the

presidency of Colombia and retired into private life. Congress voted him

an annual pension of $30,000. A month later Quito and Guayaquil

separated from Colombia and formed the independent state of Ecuador.

Even the name Colombia was dropped by the remaining state, and the old

name of New Granada adopted. In 1857 the name Colombia was assumed once

more.

Bolivar died in a small house near Santa Martha, December 17, 1831,

having witnessed the failure of his most cherished plans. San Martin had

retired to Europe in 1823 with his only child, a daughter named

Mercedes. They lived a retired life in Brussels. Once only, in 1828, he

returned to his native land, but was received with such denunciation by

the press of Buenos Aires that he quickly turned his face towards Europe

again. He died at Boulogne, August 17, 1850. Thirty years later the

Argentine people had his remains brought back to his native land. In

May, 1880, with imposing ceremonies, they were laid to rest in the

Cathedral of Buenos Aires.

Mexico was twice revolutionized. The first struggle began in 1809 and

1810, and was carried on spasmodically until 1817. The second revolution

broke out in 1820 on receipt of the news from Spain of the revolution of

March, 1820, and the re-adoption of the constitution of 1812. The old

revolutionists demanded the proclamation of this constitution in Mexico,

but the Viceroy Apodaca opposed them. Augustin de Iturbide, a native

Mexican, who in the first revolution had steadfastly adhered to the

cause of the king, now defected to the popular side with a large body

of troops which the viceroy had entrusted to his command. On February

24, 1821, he issued the celebrated document known as the Plan of Iguala,

from the town of that name. In it he proposed the maintenance of the

Roman Catholic religion to the exclusion of all others, the independence

of Mexico from Spain, and the establishment of a limited monarchy. The

Imperial Crown of Mexico was to be offered first to Ferdinand VII; in

the event of his declining, to the younger princes of his house; and in

the event of their refusal, the duty of naming an emperor was to fall to

the representative assembly of Mexico. The personal and property rights

of Spaniards in Mexico were carefully guaranteed. In securing the

interests of Spaniards and of the clergy, those who had most to lose,

this plan differed essentially from the revolutionary policy of the

other Spanish colonies. On the other hand, the Creole element was

satisfied with the promise of independence and a representative

government. The revolutionary army became known as "the Army of the

Three Guarantees," these being (1) the maintenance of the religious

establishment in its present form, (2) independence, and (3) the union

of Americans and Spaniards.[35] This ingenious document received

immediately the widest approval.

The Viceroy Apodaca had practically abdicated when his successor,

General O'Donaju, arrived from Spain. As the latter had come without

troops, there was nothing left but for him to recognize the revolution

as an accomplished fact and make the best terms for his country he

could. Accordingly he met Iturbide in conference at Cordova, and after

a brief discussion signed the treaty bearing that name, August 24, 1821.

It was agreed that a provisional junta should be appointed, that

O'Donaju should be a member, and that the junta should proceed to carry

into effect the plan of Iguala. O'Donaju then persuaded the Royalists to

open the gates of the capital, and on September 27, 1821, Iturbide

entered. Shortly thereafter O'Donaju died from the yellow fever, thus

leaving Iturbide free to carry out his plans. The Spanish government, of

course, repudiated the treaty of Cordova.

The Congress, which assembled in pursuance of the program of Iguala, was

divided between Imperialists and Republicans. In spite of the opposition

of the latter, Iturbide had himself proclaimed emperor and his family

ennobled. Congress soon fell into disputes with the emperor, who

finally, in October, 1822, dissolved it by force. A few months later

Santa Anna inaugurated a counter-revolution from Vera Cruz, which

resulted in the abdication of the emperor. Iturbide was allowed to leave

the country. He retired to Italy, where he resided until toward the

close of 1823, when he went to London. In May, 1824, at the solicitation

of certain of his partisans, he sailed again for Mexico,[36] ignorant of

the decree of perpetual banishment passed against him by the Congress a

few weeks before. He landed at Tampico July 12, but was seized and

executed a few days later. The new assembly then in session adopted a

constitution, and the Republic of Mexico was launched upon what was to

prove, for years to come, a career of turbulence and anarchy.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Hall's "Journal on Chili, Peru, and Mexico," 2 Vols. Edinburgh,

1824, Vol. I, p. 249.

[2] Am. St. Pap., For. Rel., Vol. IV, pp. 156-159.

[3] Hall's "Journal," Vol. I, p. 296. See also Rodney's report on South

America, in Vol. IV, Am. St. Pap., For. Rel.

[4] A full history of the India House and an account of its regulations

is given by Veitia Linage in his "Norte de la Contratacion," Seville,

1672; translated into English by Captain John Stevens under the title,

"Spanish Rule of Trade to the West Indies," London, 1702. Linage was for

a number of years Treasurer and Comptroller of the India House. A good

summary of the history and regulations of the House is given by Prof.

Bernard Moses in his "Casa de Contratacion" in the Papers of the Am.

Hist. Ass. for 1894, and in the third chapter of his "Establishment of

Spanish Rule in America."

[5] Linage, "Norte de la Contratacion," p. 107.

[6] _Ibid._, p. 110.

[7] _Ibid._, p. 113.

[8] _Ibid._, p. 114.

[9] _Ibid._, p. 109.

[10] _Ibid._, p. 109.

[11] Linage, "Norte de la Contratacion," pp. 191-193.

[12] Hall's "Journal," Vol. I, pp. 253-254.

[13] "The Assiento; or Contract for Allowing to the Subjects of Great

Britain the Liberty of Importing Negroes into the Spanish America."

Printed by John Baskett, London, 1713.

[14] "The Assiento; or Contract for Allowing to the Subjects of Great

Britain the Liberty of Importing Negroes into the Spanish America."

London, 1713.

[15] Ulloa, "Voyage to South America." English translation, London,

1806, Vol. I, p. 105.

[16] "Letters and Despatches of Castlereagh," Vol. VII, p. 266 ff. This

volume is rich in information in regard to England's Spanish-American

policy.

[17] W. S. Robertson, "Francisco de Miranda and the Revolutionizing of

Spanish America" (1909).

[18] "Life and Correspondence of Rufus King," New York, 1894, Vol. II,

App. 5. For further information regarding his relations with Miranda,

see extracts from his Memorandum Book, in Vol. III, App. 3.

[19] See Miranda's letter to President Adams, March 24, 1798. "Life and

Corresp. of King," Vol. II, p. 654.

[20] "Life and Corresp. of King," Vol. II, p. 650.

[21] See King's letter to Hamilton, March 4, 1799. "Life and Corresp.,"

p. 662.

[22] "Letters and Despatches of Castlereagh," Vol. VII.

[23] See Sherman, "General Account of Miranda's Expedition," N. Y.,

1808.

[24] H. A. Washington, "Writings of Thomas Jefferson," Vol. V, p. 474;

"Madison's Writings," Vol. II, pp. 220, 225.

[25] "Letters and Despatches of Castlereagh," Vol. VII, p. 314 ff.

[26] See Watson, "Spanish and Portuguese South America." 2 Vols. London,

1884, Vol. II, p. 271 ff.

[27] See "Letters and Despatches of Castlereagh," Vol. VII, p. 316 ff.

[28] Romero, "Mexico and the United States," Putnam, 1898, p. 287.

[29] "Letters and Despatches of Castlereagh," Vol. VII.

[30] Mitre, "The Emancipation of South America." Translated by Pilling.

London, 1893.

[31] See Cochrane (Earl Dundonald), "Service in Chili." 2 Vols. London,

1859.

[32] Hall's "Journal," Vol. I, p. 181. Report of Conversation with San

Martin in Callao Roads.

[33] Hall's "Journal," Vol. I, p. 194.

[34] Holstein, "Life of Bolivar." Boston, 1829.

[35] Hall's "Journal," Vol. II, p. 188.

[36] See the statement of Iturbide in regard to his political life

published in the _Pamphleteer_, London, 1827.

The United States and Latin America · 第 1 / 9 章