But it is from the textile trades that the great mass of the

THE GIRL IN INDUSTRY

"The adolescent stage of life has long seemed to me one of the most

fascinating of all themes, more worthy, perhaps, than anything in the

world of reverence, most inviting study, and in most crying need of a

service we do not yet understand how to render aright."

G. Stanley Hall, _Adolescence_, I. xix.

THE

GIRL IN INDUSTRY

BY

D. J. COLLIER

WITH A FOREWORD AND INTRODUCTION BY

B. L. HUTCHINS

AUTHOR OF "WOMEN IN MODERN INDUSTRY"

[Illustration]

LONDON

G. BELL AND SONS, LTD.

1918

CONTENTS

PAGE

Foreword. B. L. Hutchins v

Introduction. B. L. Hutchins ix

Part I. Investigation. D. J. Collier 1

Part II. Recommendations. D. J. Collier 49

Table I. 55

Table II. 56

FOREWORD

The problem of the adolescent at work is a very complex one; not only

the economic, but also the educational, physiological, and biological

reactions of industrial work have to be considered. The present work

does not attempt anything like a comprehensive discussion of the

subject; it is merely a small contribution to existing knowledge of

the facts in regard to one section only: the physiological effects of

industrial work on growing girls.

The young, it is often said, are the nation's capital. If by this we

merely mean that they are the force by which the material goods of the

future will be produced, our view of life is inadequate and rather

brutal, but if the words are given a higher and more spiritual sense

they become full of significance. Youth is the future: from among the

young of to-day the parents, citizens, leaders, prophets, artists of

the next generation will arise. Work at this age should be considered

not only for the shillings it will immediately produce, but partly

for its effects on the worker's productive power later on, partly for

its effects on character, physique, mind. Dr. Stanley Hall says of

modern industry: "Not only have the forms of labour been radically

changed within a generation or two, but the basal activities that

shaped the body of primitive man have been suddenly swept away by the

new methods of modern industry.... Work is rigidly bound to fixed

hours, uniform standards, stints and piece-products, and instead of

a finished article, each individual now achieves a part of a single

process, and knows little of those that precede or follow. Machinery

has relieved the large basal muscles and laid more stress upon fine and

exact movements that involve nerve strain.... Personal interest in, and

the old native sense of responsibility for results, ownership and use

of the finished products, which have been the inspiration and soul of

work in the past, are in more and more fields gone."[1] The conditions

of much work undoubtedly tend to become mechanical, deadening, and

soul-destroying.

A strong impression seems to haunt the minds of some who are

intimately in touch with working-class conditions that adolescent

labour is excessive in amount, and that the resulting fatigue may be

cumulative in its effects and injurious to the continuance of the

race. Thus in 1904 Miss Anderson and her colleagues of the Factory

Department, being invited to report on the subject of married women's

work, found themselves impelled to the consideration of the previous

life-conditions of the women, and stated: "It is the employment

of women from _girlhood_, all through married life and through

child-bearing that impresses itself on the mind. It is useless for any

not familiar with the conditions of mill life to pronounce any opinion

... they have no conception of the stress and strain."[2]

More recently Mr. Arthur Greenwood in a pamphlet (_The Schoolchild

in Industry_, published by the Workers' Educational Association,

Manchester, 1914) states that the fatigue and prolonged standing

characteristic of some factory industries produce serious disease

in girls and young women, "and, in the opinion of many doctors,

sterility." The same impression may be found occasionally among Sick

Visitors and the like, who work among these women. Whether there is a

scientific basis for the belief it is impossible to say; there is not

at present sufficient information.

The investigation embodied in the present volume was undertaken in the

hope that it would yield some information as to the vitally important

subject of the biological effects of early employment, or, in other

words, the reaction on the woman and her offspring of industrial

employment in the adolescent years. No statistical data have, however,

been obtained on this point; probably none such could be obtained

within the limits of a small inquiry directed and financed by private

persons. Even in regard to the effects of industrial work on the health

of girls, without special regard to ulterior effects, there is at

present very little scientific information.

I welcome Miss Collier's report, therefore, as a pioneer effort; it

is limited in scope and matter by the nature of the undertaking,

but I know that she has spared no pains in collecting her facts,

and has set them out without prejudice or bias. Her experience

has suggested to us the desirability of a form of inquiry which is

probably beyond the resources of most private inquirers, but might

well be undertaken either by a Government department or by some public

fund for sociological research. Some years ago, statistics of the

anthropometrical measurements of school children in certain districts

were published.[3] These figures were obtained from elementary school

records in rural and industrial districts, and the results were

valuable and instructive. Such a survey of young people, aged 14 to

18, might usefully include not only those in industry, but also those

attending secondary schools, who in certain districts belong to much

the same social grade, and often come from the same families. Thus the

material for a valid comparison would be available, and the results,

under scientific medical guidance, might be of first-rate social

importance. Possibly also some light might be thrown upon the subject

by investigating the previous occupational histories, from the onset of

puberty onwards, of patients in maternity hospitals, and tabulating the

results with the nature of the confinement, whether normal, difficult,

or complicated.

In conclusion, Miss Collier and I wish here to offer our best thanks to

the many friends who kindly allowed themselves to be interviewed, and

gave the help and information necessary for carrying out the inquiry.

INTRODUCTION

_Numbers Employed._--The whole number of girls employed from 10 to 21

years of age amounted in 1911 to over a million and a half, or about

40 per cent of the total female population of that age. If, however,

we restrict ourselves to the adolescent girls at the ages 14 and under

18, we find that the total number employed amounted to nearly 794,800,

or 58·6 per cent of the whole. The 41·4 per cent unoccupied include

girls of the class in which women do not work for money, girls studying

who intend to follow a profession or occupation, and some girls of the

higher industrial classes who attend school one, two, or three years

beyond the elementary school age. There must also be in this group some

proportion of working-class girls who are kept at home to help their

mothers, and a small number of invalids and imbeciles who are incapable

of work.

Of the 794,800 girls occupied, it is interesting to note that 30·5 per

cent had entered service (including hotel service, but not including

laundry and washing service). If we take the whole domestic group which

includes laundry and charing as well as service, we find it takes up

34·8 of the total girls employed. Considering how much complaint is

frequently made of the unwillingness of girls to enter these ancient

and traditional paths, it is worth noting that one girl in every three

actually does so, and the girls who stay at home to help their mothers,

if we knew their numbers, would bring this proportion up a good deal

higher.

The textile trades employ 16·8 of our occupied girls, and the various

dress trades 19·2. We thus find nearly 71 per cent of occupied girls

are engaged in the occupations constantly associated with their sex

and regarded as "womanly," although in modern times nearly all textile

and a considerable proportion of the dress and laundry trades are

organised on factory lines. The other 29 per cent are dispersed over

the clerical, artistic, and other professions, and in miscellaneous

factory industries.

The proportion of girls employed varies from one place to another;

it is highest in districts where there is a well-marked industry,

especially where textile factories absorb a large proportion of female

labour. Table II. shows the proportion of girls in a few selected

districts. In industrial districts the proportion of domestic servants

is very low, and the figures bring home to us the fact that in certain

districts a large proportion of the female population spends the

transition from childhood to adult life in the mill.

It is, however, useless to spend much time over these figures, which

have become completely out of date through the war. No details for

young workers are obtainable in official statistics, but the increase

in numbers of females employed in industry since the outbreak of war

was estimated in July 1917 at 23·7, while the increase in professional

and other occupations, including transport, was 82 per cent. The total

increase in industry, commerce, and government service of various kinds

amounted to over 1,420,000, or 42·5 per cent.[4] It is probable that

the increase among girls of 14 to 18 was at least no less than among

female workers generally. The net increase in numbers must also be only

an imperfect indication of the enormous changes within the employed

group. The Munitions group, the metal trades, all the textile and other

trades that produce the clothing and other accoutrement of soldiers,

the supply of food and comforts for the army, all these industries

have expanded considerably and have drawn recruits not only from the

unoccupied but from the domestic workers, and from many other less

indispensable occupations. Women and girls have also taken the places

of men and boys in many civilian occupations.

_The Factory Act._--During the war the regulations of the Factory Act

have been considerably relaxed or suspended. The strain of industry on

the immature, however, though undoubtedly intensified by the war, was

already a matter of anxious consideration before 1914. Even in times

of peace the Factory Act vouchsafes to the adolescent worker a meagre

and inadequate protection. As regards hours of work, "young persons,"

_i.e._ such as are between 14 and 18, and also such as though only 13

have obtained a school attendance certificate, are placed on a level,

but for some trifling exceptions, with adult women. The hours of work

for both classes are the same, viz.: 10 hours in textile factories,

10-1/2 in non-textile factories and workshops, plus meal times. It is

thus legal for a girl of 13, a mere child, as most people would call

her, to be at work "all round the clock," or, including meal times, for

full 12 hours. On Saturday there is a half-holiday. The only difference

in regard to hours is that in certain industries women are permitted

overtime, which is prohibited to young persons.

_Medical Inspection._--There is, however, a provision special to

workers under 16, which is of interest, and that is the requirement

of a certificate by the certifying factory surgeon that the young

person is physically fit for the proposed employment. The surgeon has

power to reject boys and girls for work he considers unsuitable to

them, and he may also make certain qualifications or conditions as

to the kind of work on which the boy or girl should be employed. It

is evident that here we have a provision with great possibilities of

good for young people. The unfortunate side of the matter is that the

certifying surgeon is not concerned with the care of the child; he is

merely remunerated by the employer to fulfil a legal formality. Within

a few years the Women Factory Inspectors have, however, taken the

matter up and initiated action in the interests of rejected children.

The system has been shown to be most unsatisfactory. No certificates

are required for other than factory industries, so that in many cases

rejected children go to some employment which may be more harmful than

the one for which they have been rejected, or may even be admitted

by one factory surgeon into the very occupation for which another had

disqualified them.

Equally serious is the absence of any system of medical advice or

treatment for the cases in which physical defect or disease has been

notified. For these and other reasons it is highly desirable that the

factory medical service, so far as it relates to juveniles, should be

absorbed in the School Medical Service, which for nearly ten years

has been doing such good work in the detection and to some extent the

treatment of pathological conditions among school children. This body

is far better placed than the certifying surgeons, as the whole of the

elementary school population passes under its hands. Medical inspection

could then become a condition of all employment, instead of, as at

present, factory employment merely, and suitable arrangements could

be made without much difficulty for medical care and treatment where

necessary. It would be likely, also, that the school doctors would

take a more enlightened view of factory conditions and the needs of

adolescence than the certifying surgeons, and would have the Education

Authority at their backs in urging the importance of healthful

conditions on the employer in the factory.[5]

_The Industrial Conditions needed for the Young._--In regard to

girls the importance of adapting conditions of work to the needs

of the immature woman is a matter of thought and care, of details

intelligently combined into a coherent whole. Given suitable

arrangements it need by no means be assumed that the factory is

inherently injurious to women and girls. Several persons whose views

have been included in the following report even thought that factory

life was beneficial in some respects. Dr. Louis Starr also says: "While

there is no question of the evils of child-labour, more of the young

suffer from too little than too much use of the muscles. Where harm

comes the blame should not be put upon the mere work, but upon the

unhealthy surroundings, bad work-rooms, long hours, great monotony,

over-specialisation and excessive use of the accessory and neglect of

the fundamental muscles."[6]

The principle of economic individualism has been definitely thrown

over by all but a few invincible doctrinaires, and it is coming to be

recognised that the shoe must fit the human foot and not the foot be

cut down to suit the shoe. We are beginning, greatly daring, to foresee

a time when directors of industry will be required to revise their

schemes of management or even to construct new ones, not merely to

avoid injury to workers, but with the view of promoting their healthy

mental and physical development. Hours of work must be considerably

shortened for young workers, rest pauses must be introduced to minimise

fatigue, time must be allowed for physical exercise, education, and

recreation, and the whole surroundings of work modified with a regard

for the personality of the workers. The question of speed is of

special importance in regard to young girls. In America, where speed

and strain have been and still are extreme, it is beginning to be

recognised by the most enlightened employers that it is useless to urge

the human organisation beyond the power of endurance. In some cases

speeds have been reduced to get the best results.[7]

Detailed study is necessary in order to adapt the work to the

capabilities of the workers. In Miss Collier's reports several

interesting notes will be found on the desirability of picking strong

girls for certain kinds of work: on the need of seats, and specially of

the right kind of seats, and other points. When a new Factory Act comes

under consideration, as we hope it may after the war, the needs of

youthful workers will be the point that most urgently requires emphasis

and re-statement, and I venture to hope that the then Home Secretary

will take account of Miss Collier's investigation.

The war has shown us the extraordinary elasticity of productive

power in modern times. In response to an urgent national need,

material production has been stretched to a point that would have

been incredible a few years ago. This is surely an indication

that--apart from the present need for enormous quantities of

war-material--production can satisfy the bodily wants of men and

yield a surplus for the higher needs of civilised communities without

excessive toil, certainly without overtaxing the young and immature.

Further, much evidence collected both before and during the war

indicates that overwork is relatively unproductive compared with work

for reasonable hours. All this shows that we can, if we wish, decide to

be the master of the machine and not its slave. The knowledge and the

power are there: let not the will be lacking.

INVESTIGATION

Little attention has been given until quite recent times to the

effects of industrial work on the health and physique of adolescent

girls. Child labour has been the subject of much discussion, and

medical investigations have shown the detrimental influence exerted

by wage-earning employment on the plastic organism of the growing

child. It is recognised that with children bodily work often produces

a greater degree of fatigue both mental and physical than does mental

work of equal duration. The various legal restrictions limiting the

hours and controlling the conditions of the labour of children,

although inadequate in extent and sometimes only permissive in

character, are evidence of a realisation that the well-being of the

child is of more importance than its immediate commercial utility. This

recognition of the necessity of guarding against overstrain during

the critical early years does not, however, extend to the period of

adolescence. The restrictions of the hours of work and the conditions

of employment of young persons of both sexes differ but slightly

from those applying to adult women. This failure to appreciate the

special problems of adolescence is the more remarkable in that medical

evidence has shown that young children grow and develop despite

great hardships, while adolescence is more dependent upon favouring

conditions in the environment, disturbances of which more easily

retard development and effectively injure the still growing body. "In

late adolescence contrasted with earlier life there is more variation

in growth, much greater liability to retrogression, and increased

susceptibility to outside influences, unfavourable surroundings, and

conditions more readily causing arrest of growth and preventing perfect

maturity."[8]

In the evidence before the Physical Deterioration Committee in 1904,

Dr. Eichholz[9] emphasised the need of close attention to the physical

condition of young girls who take up industrial work between the ages

of 14 and 18, for the conditions under which they work, rest, and

eat doubtless account for the rapid falling off in physique which

so frequently accompanies the transition from school to work. And

the summary of that Committee states: "The period of adolescence is

responsible for much waste of human material and for the entrance

upon maturity of permanently damaged and ineffective persons of both

sexes. The plasticity of the human organisation, the power it possesses

of yielding rapidly towards degenerative or recuperative influences

appears to terminate at 18."

This sketch of the conditions and circumstances of the girl in

industry was undertaken as a contribution to the study of the effects

of industrial employment on the health and physique of the female

population of the country, and it was hoped that in the course of

the investigation some light would be thrown on the question of the

relation of the employment of the young girl to her health after

marriage. Only a minority of women are normally employed at any time,

but as an examination of the figures in Table I. shows, a large

majority of girls between the ages of 15 and 19 are employed, and of

these more than one-half work in manufactures, over two-thirds of the

factory and workshop girls being absorbed in the textile and clothing

trades. It follows from this that the majority of women have been

employed during the critical years of adolescence which have so great

an influence on the physical constitution of later years.

As it was impossible in a private inquiry, such as this, to cover a

wide range, certain industries which seemed to offer the best scope

for the investigation were selected and subjected to as detailed an

examination as was possible. The entrance of large numbers of girls

and young women into the industries connected with the manufacture

of munitions suggested Birmingham and Coventry as fruitful fields of

inquiry, and the increase in welfare supervision with appointment

of matrons and nurses in charge of surgeries and rest-rooms seemed

to indicate that the required information would be easily obtained,

while the abnormal conditions prevailing in these industries offered

a favourable ground for investigation in that they afforded unusual

opportunities of studying the effects of excessive hours of work, night

work, and other variations in hours and conditions of employment. In

addition to collecting evidence from a number of these supervisors in

the factories, I endeavoured to find out from social workers, in touch

with girls outside the factory, how far the abnormal conditions due to

the pressure of war work are affecting the general health of girls. It

is only natural that patriotic zeal and a desire to earn good money

on piece-rates may mask any possible evil influences that long hours

and increased speeding up may exert, so that the evidence from those

in charge of girls in the factories, if considered alone, might not

disclose the true state of affairs. Since it was impossible to get

statistical evidence as to output, accidents, and actual industrial

fatigue, I interviewed secretaries of Girls' Clubs and Care Committee

workers connected with the Birmingham Juvenile Advisory Boards, who

were in touch with girls between the ages of 14 and 16. I saw also a

number of medical men and women with panel practices in industrial

districts. The certifying surgeons were not able to give me any

information, as they deal only with young persons who are commencing

their industrial careers.

But it is from the textile trades that the great mass of the evidence

is derived. The cotton industry of Lancashire and the wool and worsted

industries of the West Riding of Yorkshire, built up as they are on

the labour of children and young persons, offered a much wider field

than the non-textile trades, and here, where the girls join their Trade

Union directly they are working full time, there is much more class

consciousness and reflection upon industrial conditions. Consequently

evidence as to these industries, together with that of the clothing

trade, is derived mainly from the Trade Union officials, particularly

from the Sick Visitors of the Insurance sections, and from meetings

of operatives called together for the purpose by the Trade Union

secretary. In the course of the inquiry I visited a number of mills,

both spinning and manufacturing, and thus gathered a good deal of

information from employers, managers, and overlookers. A certain number

of doctors were also visited, and some of these supplied much valuable

evidence, but it must be remarked here that many doctors, possibly

from stress of work, fail to note the relation between occupation and

disease except in extreme and obvious cases, particularly in towns

where one main industry occupies a large proportion of the inhabitants,

and where one imagines deductions as to occupational disease and

tendencies to disease could be most easily made.

In addition to the engineering and textile trades I have collected

evidence from a few miscellaneous industries in the various towns I

have visited, generally from "good" employers, who have made some

study of industrial fatigue or whose interest in the welfare of their

employees had directed their attention to some of the problems under

discussion.

The evidence from the clothing trade was collected at Hebden Bridge

and from various other towns where wholesale tailoring is merely

a subsidiary industry. The conditions in Hebden Bridge due to the

ever-present shortage of female labour make these clothing operatives

the aristocrats of their trade, so that the general results of

industrial work here had to be correlated with the evidence from the

clothing trade in other towns.

GENERAL CONCLUSIONS

_Hours._--The evidence to be considered under this heading is concerned

with various factors: the total number of hours worked each week, the

length of the spells, and the number and length of the pauses for rest

and meals, as well as the time of employment, _i.e._ day or night work.

At the time when the inquiry was initiated (October 1916), practically

all the munition factories in Birmingham were working a 60-hour week,

and only in a very few cases had three 8-hour shifts been tried. This

was due mainly to the difficulty of securing sufficient male labour

for setting tools, etc., and also to the fact that there was already

some difficulty in getting enough female workers. Similarly in Coventry

the total weekly hours ranged between 55 and 60, though at one factory

visited girls under 18 worked only 47 hours, and those over 18 worked

53 hours. The evidence of Welfare supervisors and nurses in charge

of rest-rooms went to show that these long hours had not exerted the

bad effect that had been expected. Various witnesses stated that "no

signs of undue fatigue had been observed," "no increased sickness

since the hours had been lengthened," "the strain of the long hours

is considerable, but actual breakdowns are rare." Another witness is

"quite astounded" at the good standard of health after a long period of

55-hour weeks. One witness, a medical woman who had examined the girls

at a factory working 10 hours and more per day for six and sometimes

seven days per week, found no marked deterioration when she examined

them again at the end of six months. But she stated emphatically that

the good food now obtainable because of the better wages was largely

responsible for this result. It must be remembered that in pre-war

times the average wage for girls on simple engineering processes in

Birmingham and district was about 8s. to 10s. per week, while now they

would get 16s. to 30s., and it must be concluded that some of the girls

under discussion were now adequately nourished for the first time in

their lives. Again, the results of this particular inquiry must be

taken as representing the survival of the fittest, as many of the

girls examined the first time the doctor visited the factory had left,

possibly because of ill-health, before the second visit.

Nearly all the witnesses quoted above insisted that the high standard

of health that prevailed was due mainly to better living and increased

care, which did much to mitigate the possible evil effects of the long

hours. One matron pointed out that girls who are earning good wages

and who are therefore financially independent, get far better care

and attention at home than if they are not earning, and this prevents

breakdowns.

There is, however, another side to this optimistic picture, and this

is presented by some of the doctors interviewed and by Girls' Club

secretaries and Care Committee workers. One woman doctor stated that

there is much increased sickness--anaemia, gastric disturbances,

etc., among girls working long hours. Another doctor declared that

the fatigue resulting from long hours of labour frequently leads to

acute anaemia and then to irregular menstruation, and he said that the

greater part of the work was not too heavy and not entirely unsuitable

for girls, but that the hours were so long as not to allow time to

recover from fatigue.

The secretaries of Clubs and Care Committees were unanimous in their

condemnation of the present system of long hours. They say the girls

they come across are thoroughly worn out, "languid and lacking in

vitality," "pale and nervous," and "incapable of taking an interest

in anything." The fatigue seemed to affect them mentally more than

physically; thus the worker at one Club said that the girls working

long hours, _i.e._ about 60 per week, were quite incapable of

brainwork, so all classes, even needlework, had to be stopped, but

they could stand the most strenuous drill and gymnastic work for two

evenings a week and did not want to stop when the Club closed: the

constrained nature of their work, generally tending automatic machines,

seemed to increase their restlessness, and they are glad to work it

off in any occupation involving movement. In case this point, which

others corroborated, seems to contradict the view that the long hours

made the girls lethargic and apathetic, it must be mentioned that this

same witness said that when any girls were working 1-1/2 hours over

their 10 hours, they were fagged physically as well as mentally and

would not have the energy to drill, etc., but would just sit and watch

the others. As a general rule the girls do not complain of the long

hours, and very few cases of complete breakdown are recorded. This

is attributed to the higher standard of living made possible by the

increased wages and to the fact that many girls have been lost sight of

since the pressure of work has become so great.

The evidence from a few miscellaneous industries, drawn as it is from

the experience of a few "good" employers, is of a very different

nature. Here the hours worked seldom, if ever, exceed 9 per day, and

in some instances experiments had been tried with an 8-hour day with

satisfactory results to both health and output. It must be remembered

that most of the work done by girls in these miscellaneous factories

is of an intensely monotonous nature--packing and sorting finished

goods, "taking off" on printing machines, making cardboard boxes or tin

canisters, but, at the same time, the work is very light and easy and

is learnt in a day or so, although some weeks may elapse before the

maximum speed is attained. The only danger in these light automatic

processes is the temptation, often encouraged by the employer, of

excessive speeding up, but to this I will refer later. As a general

rule, the evidence from this group goes to show that the standard of

health among girls working 8 or 9 hours a day is quite satisfactory,

and the sickness rates are very low. How far these good results are

due to the shortness of the working-day compared with that of the

munition and textile industries, and how far to the various "welfare"

provisions, such as special attention to delicate girls, supply of hot

drinks in the middle of the morning and afternoon spells, gymnastic

classes during work hours and so on, it is difficult to say. It is

interesting to note that one employer reported that the addition of two

hours' overtime to a 9-hour day for three days a week caused excessive

fatigue after a few months, so that the overtime was stopped, but after

a month the pressure of work was so great that they had to return to

it, and now they find that this excessive fatigue is avoided, or,

rather, fatigue so extreme as to diminish output is avoided by working

every fourth week without overtime.

Turning now to the textile industry, particularly the cotton trade of

Lancashire with its 55-1/2-hour week and its 6 A.M. start, we find

opinion somewhat divided. A certain number of employers and their

representatives declared that the hours worked exert no detrimental

effect on young girls, and that the time lost through sickness is very

slight. But these statements are outweighed by the evidence of most of

the inside managers and some of the employers interviewed. One of the

latter firmly believed that the present working hours are too long for

young girls, and had often noticed how they fell off in health. Another

states that young workers find the long hours very tiring and that a

shorter working-day, which would be an advantage for all, is almost a

necessity for young girls, although he has no exact evidence that the

hours worked are actually detrimental.

But the heaviest indictment against the 10-hour day comes from the

Trade Union representatives. Many of these declare that the girls are

utterly worn out at the end of the day and are generally incapable of

any serious work, which accounts for the small proportion of girls who

attend Workers' Educational Association and other evening classes. The

strain of most of the work in cotton factories, both on the preparing

and on the manufacturing sides, is considerable, and the competition to

increase output is very great. Girls and women are indirectly set to

emulate one another and to compete with men and boys. Some observers

say that the girls are tired out by 4.30 P.M., and that if the hours

were reduced the output would be more regular, as at the present time

girls are unconsciously forced to "slack." The Sick Visitors of one of

the large Weavers' Unions in north-east Lancashire state that "shorter

hours are far more important for the well-being of the weaver than

either weavers or manufacturers realise," and they point out that the

girls look much brighter and better when they are away from work with

minor ailments, and certainly the sickness returns show that fewer are

ill when "short time" is general as in the latter half of 1914. This

is confirmed by the experience of other Unions. The weaving master in

one of the technical schools, who had been a working weaver for years,

was convinced that the hours are too long for all operatives, but

especially for growing girls, and he said, "One has only to live in a

household of weavers to notice the extreme weariness and lassitude with

which they sink into chairs as soon as they get home in the evening."

As a proof of the evil effects of the long working-day my attention

was frequently drawn to the physical differences between the girls

attending the secondary schools and those who work in the mills. In

the majority of cases, particularly in north-east Lancashire, both

groups come from the same class and from the same type of home, but the

former are tall, well-built, and rosy-cheeked, while the latter are

often short, always thin, and generally pale and anaemic.

The comparison between the different effects of weaving and winding

is instructive. The latter process is of itself more tiring and

monotonous, and the strain is continuous; yet winders are said to be in

better health and to be much more cheerful and energetic out of work

hours. This apparent inconsistency is explained by the fact that the

winders seldom work a full week; they frequently start after breakfast,

and generally "play" on Saturday and one other morning every week.

One witness emphasised her conviction that the long hours were

mainly responsible for the very prevalent ill-health of girls and of

older women by declaring that no reform of factory conditions can be

effective until the hours are shortened.

The medical witnesses were also unanimous in their belief that the

long hours of confinement in the close atmosphere of the mill is the

cause of much of the ill-health that is prevalent among girls about 16

and 17. The fatigue resulting from the hours of labour weakens their

resistance to disease, and they are liable to fall victims to any

epidemics, while anaemia, gastric and menstrual disturbances are very

frequent about this age.

The worsted industry told the same tale. Many of the employers

interviewed were in favour of a shorter working-day, as the younger

operatives get very tired at 4.30 P.M. and work suffers, while a Trade

Union representative declared that the hours are exceedingly fatiguing

for all female workers, particularly for growing girls, who, unlike

the men and boys, practically in all cases have domestic work when the

factory day is over.

The majority of the employers in the clothing trade had never given

any consideration to the effects of the hours on the health of their

operatives. Consequently they were vehement in declaring that a 52-hour

week exerted no injurious influences. On the other hand, the Sick

Visitors of the local branches of the United Garment Workers' Union

were confident that the 9-1/2-hour day in the confined atmosphere of

the factory was particularly harmful for young girls, and they pointed

out that the sickness returns were always lower during slack time and

during strikes, while other witnesses, although unable to make any

definite statement on the effects of the hours worked, said that very

few girls at the clothing factories have much energy for Continuation

and Workers' Educational Classes after their full day's work.

In non-textile factories 5-hour spells are very common. All the

doctors interviewed spoke very strongly against this practice. It is

noteworthy that far more accidents are reported as occurring in the

5-hour spells than in shorter periods, and the general opinion is that

the spell is too long for health and efficiency. In many munition

factories short breaks for ten or fifteen minutes have been instituted

in the 5-hour spells, and trolleys from the canteens are sent round

with cheap refreshments. The benefit derived from this system is

everywhere acknowledged, and the wonder is that so few experiments with

rest pauses have been tried. The 4-1/2-hour spell also comes in for

much criticism, and some observers say that the girls are thoroughly

fatigued at the end of the time, while the Welfare supervisor at one

works goes so far as to say that the last half-hour even of a 4-hour

spell drags so heavily with the younger workers that a 3-1/2-hour spell

would be a distinct advantage both to health and to output.

The continuous 4-1/2-hour spell allowed by the Factory Acts for the

textile industry is seldom adopted in either the cotton or worsted

trades, the most usual hours being 6 A.M. to 8 A.M., 8.30 A.M. to

12.30 P.M., and 1.30 P.M. to 5.30 P.M. Very little attention has

been paid to the effects of the 4-hour spells as such, and though

many observers say that girls are thoroughly fatigued by 3.30 or

4.30 P.M., this seems to be due mainly to the total number of hours

already worked rather than to the fatiguing influence of the individual

spell. With regard to the early morning start characteristic of these

industries, opinion was sharply divided. Some employers and Trade Union

representatives declared that no ill-effects resulted, while others

were most insistent that the work before breakfast was the cause of

much illness and discomfort. Whilst it is impossible to dogmatise in

the face of these conflicting statements, especially in view of the

fact that neither side can produce scientific evidence in its defence,

so that the statements are probably the result of social and domestic

considerations, it may be assumed that the early start is harmful

in the cold winter months, but that it does not of itself exert any

injurious influence in the summer.

Night work for juvenile workers is now almost universally condemned.

The effects of such work are more marked than with adult workers, the

nervous strain is considerable, and lassitude and weariness invariably

accompany the night shift. This results in spite of the fact that

girls are reported to sleep well during the day, unlike the older

women, whose domestic concerns frequently prevent sleep in the daytime.

Some witnesses from Birmingham and Coventry report that night-work

was still (November 1916) common for juvenile workers. Where Welfare

Workers are in charge, however, they endeavour to restrict it to girls

over 16, though even with these the fatigue is considerable, as sleep

is frequently broken by the mother waking the girl to partake of the

family mid-day meal. Evidence as to the relative merits of long and

short periods of night-work are so conflicting that it is impossible

to draw any conclusions, and as the question is receiving considerable

attention from the Health of Munition Workers' Committee, it was not

made the subject of special investigation.

Some explanation of the conflict of evidence recorded under this

section of the inquiry may be found in the outlook of the witnesses

interviewed. Where increased output and commercial profit were the

chief concern, so long as few actual breakdowns occurred the witness

would report no unfavourable results from long hours of labour, while

those whose main interest lay with the well-being of the worker would

notice any falling off in health with long hours and would report

accordingly. It is obvious that no definite conclusions as to the

immediate or ultimate effect of long hours can be made from evidence of

this nature. In the second part of this report suggestions will be made

as to the lines on which more scientific inquiry should be conducted

in order to determine the exact effects of varying hours of industrial

work on the physical organisation of adolescent girls.

_Protracted Standing and Opportunity for Rest._--Evidence as to the

provision of seats in munition factories is, on the whole, very

encouraging. Most workshops have stools or seats for use during the

short pauses which occur whilst waiting for materials or for the

setting of tools, and where possible younger girls are put on work that

can be done sitting down, whilst Welfare supervisors are generally

ready to recommend that delicate girls be transferred from work which

involves protracted standing to processes which allow occasional or

even continued sitting-down, and foremen are nearly always willing to

fall in with the Welfare Workers' suggestions. Only in a few cases have

there been difficulties in securing seats: where men have been formerly

employed the foremen are sometimes prejudiced against allowing girls

to sit down, but they are soon convinced of the wisdom of making this

concession.

With certain processes prolonged standing is inevitable, but evidence

as to resulting injury was not forthcoming in Birmingham or Coventry.

None of the doctors interviewed was able to make any statement

regarding the effects of a continued standing posture, as no cases

of injury that could be attributed to this cause had come to their

notice. Some of the Welfare supervisors stated that girls got very

tired at first but soon got used to the permanent standing, and that

no serious or lasting injuries resulted, though in a few cases girls

not used to industrial work would get flat-footed or would suffer from

swollen feet. While varicose veins are rare in young girls, every

witness brought into contact with older married women was impressed by

the apparent inevitability of this trouble in later years, but it is

impossible to gather how far work during adolescence is responsible.

Evidence as to the effects of standing on the menstrual function will

be discussed later.

From the evidence received it seems probable that only a small

proportion, and these perhaps the more delicate, are troubled by

prolonged standing, but attention may be drawn to the evidence of one

large factory where 50 per cent of all new workers leave before the

end of six months, and of these 30 per cent declare that they find the

standing so fatiguing that they cannot remain at the work.

In most of the processes of the cotton and worsted industries chances

of resting are exceedingly rare. Girls carrying laps[10] from the

blowing-room to the cards, can-tenters and drawing-frame minders in the

card-room, and winders and weavers, seldom, if ever, get an opportunity

to sit down. Girls on the slubber, intermediate, and roving frames, and

those in the ring-room of the cotton trade and the spinning-rooms of

the worsted industry, are in a better position in that a few minutes'

rest is sometimes possible, and some managers and overlookers believe

that these girls are less tired and show a better sickness record than

the former group. Even where the nature of the work allows occasional

periods of rest, seats are scarcely ever provided, so that the girls

seldom sit down unless the waste-boxes or the skips are in a suitable

position so that they can see down their frames to note if the work is

proceeding all right. Many of the witnesses stated complacently that

the girls soon got used to the prolonged standing, but doctors noted

that prolapsed wombs were not uncommon in young women between 20 and

30, though some felt that the number of cases were not sufficient to

warrant any conclusions. Sick Visitors also reported that prolapse

was not unusual, and that most girls found the long hours of standing

very fatiguing. Cases of prolapse are sometimes reported amongst young

married women who have not worked after marriage and who have had every

care after child-birth, which seems to point to an adverse influence

exerted during adolescence. Sometimes girls complain bitterly of the

lack of opportunity for even a few minutes' rest, and the Sick Visitors

say that conditions of work which do not allow a girl to snatch even a

short respite during a 10-hour day do not give her a chance to get over

any constitutional delicacy. As a general rule, however, the girls make

no complaints, but older women find the continued standing very tiring,

and many witnesses believe that this is due to the cumulative strain

of long years, while some declare that the anaemia prevalent among

young textile workers is largely due to the weakened condition brought

about by long hours of standing.

Reference may be made here to the necessity for attention to the type

of seat provided, particularly in entirely sedentary occupations, as in

the clothing trade and in many of the processes of such industries as

biscuit-making, soap-manufacturing, etc. Witnesses from the clothing

trade laid great stress on the fact that sitting all day on a small

hard stool was extremely fatiguing for growing girls, as it gave no

support to their backs, and the Welfare Worker of a large soap-works,

after trying one of the stools in her own office, is having them all

replaced by chairs with suitable backs in those departments where the

work is mainly sedentary.

_Weight-carrying and Heavy Work._--As far as one can gather from the

rather scanty evidence available under this heading, girls under 16 in

munition works are seldom engaged on work involving heavy lifting and

carrying. The majority of young girls are feeding automatic machines

and working power presses, and all materials are brought and taken away

by special labourers. Many girls over 16 have been substituted for men

workers, but it is exceedingly difficult to gauge the effect which such

work is exerting on their health. Overlookers and Welfare supervisors

declare that tall strong girls are chosen for heavy processes and that

very few injuries result, while a girl can be transferred to lighter

work if the heavy work is too fatiguing. One doctor related how she had

just concluded the examination of 200 women and girls engaged on heavy

capstan lathes and had discovered no injurious effects, but she pointed

out that they were all from the Black Country, where women and girls

have been doing heavy work for several generations, and their physique

was undoubtedly superior to that of the average industrial girl worker.

Another doctor stated that the carrying of weights over 50 lbs. is

exceedingly injurious to adolescent girls, as it causes the heart to

beat too quickly, so that after a time the beat is continuously rapid

and anaemia sets in. This effect is seldom, if ever, noticed in girls

over 20. On the other hand, uterine injuries are practically unknown in

young girls and hernia is very rare.

The Girl in Industry · 第 1 / 4 段