Cantacuzenus, too weak to stop the progress of the Turks, complained of

this violation of the peace. Orkhan excused his son, saying that it was

not force of arms which had opened the gates of the towns of the Greek

empire, but the divine will manifested by the earthquake. The Emperor

made representations that he was not agitating to know whether it was by

the gates or by the breaches that Suleiman had penetrated into the

places in question, but whether or not he possessed them legitimately.

Orkhan then asked a delay for reflection, and subsequently promised that

he would request his son to return the towns that he occupied, if

Cantacuzenus, on his side, would engage to pay him a sum of forty

thousand ducats. At the same time he invited him to an interview to meet

Suleiman on the Gulf of Nicomedia. But the Sultan pretending to be ill,

the Emperor returned to Byzantium, without having obtained anything.

Orkhan now found himself in one of the happiest of political situations.

The division of sovereign authority between Cantacuzenus and his pupil

John Palæologus, and their continual wars, allowed him to address one or

the other according as his interests and the circumstances demanded. It

was thus that John Palæeologus, ally of the Genoese, undertook to

deliver from captivity to Phoceus, the son of Orkhan, Khalil or Kasim,

whom the governor Calothes surrendered for a ransom of one hundred

thousand pieces of gold and the concession of the glorious title of

Panhypersebastos ("very venerable"). The service that John had rendered

did not prevent Orkhan from sending to Abydos a body of troops to rescue

the son of Cantacuzenus, Mathias, then at war with the Bulgarians.

From the epoch when the Ottomans made durable conquests in the Greek

empire, Asia each spring threw new hordes into Europe, until the time

when the successors of Orkhan had extended their domination from the

shores of the Sea of Marmora to those of the Danube.

The conquest of Gallipoli, which had opened the gate of the Greek empire

and the whole of the European continent to the Ottomans, was announced

by "letters of victory" to the neighboring princes of Orkhan, whose

father had divided with Osman the heritage of the Seljukian sultans. The

use of these "letters of victory" has been preserved to this day in

Turkey, and their style, already so pompous in the days of Orkhan, has

become so proudly emphatic that this kind of document to-day is not the

least curious of those which belong to the annals of the Turkish nation.

Orkhan left to his son, Suleiman Pacha, and Hadji-Ilbeki the charge of

preserving the conquests made in Europe; Suleiman established his

residence at Gallipoli, and Ilbeki at Konour. The first overran the

country as far as Demitoka; the second as far as Tschorli and Hireboli.

Adjebeg received in fief the valley which still bears his name.

But Suleiman enjoyed for only a few years the fruits of his conquests.

One day while hunting wild geese between Boulair and Sidi-Kawak, that is

to say near the palatine of the Cid, and following at a gallop the

flight of his falcon, he fell so violently from his horse (1359) as to

be instantly killed. His body was deposited, not in the mausoleum of

the Osman family at Prusa, where he had caused a mosque to be erected in

the quarter of the confectioners, but near the mosque of Boulair, also

founded by him. Orkhan, to perpetuate the exploits of his son, caused a

tomb to be built to his memory on the shore of the Hellespont, the only

one which, during more than a century, was erected in memory of an

Ottoman prince on Greek soil. Of all the sepulchres of Turkish heroes

which the national historians mention with holy respect, that of the

founder of the Ottoman power in Europe is the most venerated and the

most frequented by pilgrims. It is still to be seen to the north of the

embouchure of the Hellespont.

Tradition attributes yet another victory to Suleiman after his death. At

the head of a troop of celestial heroes, mounted on white horses,

encircled by a brilliant aureole, he is said to have vanquished an army

of infidels. The love of the marvellous, so general among orientals, the

leaning which all people have to make heaven intervene in the deeds

relating to their origin, alone can explain this tradition, for it would

be useless to seek any historic fact which could have given it birth.

According to this tradition, thirty thousand Christians appeared in the

Hellespont on a fleet of sixty-one vessels; one half disembarked at

Touzla and the other at Sidi-Kawak; it was this latter body which was

cut in pieces by the celestial troop led by Suleiman. The Ottoman

historians who relate this miracle have evidently borrowed the

apparition of these vessels from the First or the Second Crusade of the

Europeans against the Turks, and have transported them from the waters

of Smyrna to those of Gallipoli, for the greater glory of Suleiman

Pacha. Neither the history of Byzantium nor that of the crusades offers

the slightest trace of this event.

CONSPIRACY AND DEATH OF MARINO

FALIERI AT VENICE

A.D. 1355

MRS. MARGARET OLIPHANT

Marino Falieri was born at Venice about 1278, and was

elected doge in 1354. For many years the government of the

republic, under an oligarchy, had been arbitrarily dominated

by the Council of Ten, an assembly that, after serving a

special purpose for which it was created, was declared

permanent in 1325 and became a formidable tribunal.

Professing to guard the republic the Ten in fact destroyed

its liberties, disposed of its finances, overruled the

constitutional legislators, suppressed and excluded the

popular element from all voice in public affairs, and

finally reduced the nominal prince--the doge--to a mere

puppet or an ornamental functionary, still called "head of

the state."

At the time when Falieri entered upon his dogeship the city

in all quarters was pervaded by the spies of this great

oligarchy, which seized and imprisoned citizens, and even

put them to death, secretly, without itself being answerable

to any authority. The most notable event in the annals of

this extraordinary Venetian government is that which forms

the story of Marino Falieri himself. His conspiracy with the

plebeians to assassinate the oligarchs and make himself

actual ruler of the state had the double motive of a

personal grievance and the sense of a political wrong.

The fate of this old man has been made the subject of

tragedies by Byron (1820), Casimir Delavigne (1829), and

Swinburne (1885). The novel, _Doge und Dogaressa_, by Ernst

Theodor Hoffmann, was inspired by the same dramatic figure.

Of historical accounts, the following--in Mrs. Oliphant's

best manner--is justly regarded as the most impressive which

has hitherto appeared in English.

Marino Falieri had been an active servant of Venice through a long life.

He had filled almost all the great offices which were intrusted to her

nobles. He had governed her distant colonies, accompanied her armies in

that position of _proveditore_, omnipotent civilian critic of all the

movements of war, which so much disgusted the generals of the republic.

He had been ambassador at the courts of both emperor and pope, and was

serving his country in that capacity at Avignon when the news of his

election reached him.

It is thus evident that Falieri was not a man used to the position of a

lay figure, although at seventy-six the dignified retirement of a

throne, even when so encircled with restrictions, would seem not

inappropriate. That he was of a haughty and hasty temper seems apparent.

It is told of him that, after waiting long for a bishop to head a

procession at Treviso where he was _podesta_ ("chief magistrate"), he

astonished the tardy prelate by a box on the ear when he finally

appeared, a punishment for keeping the authorities waiting.

Old age to a statesman, however, is in many cases an advantage rather

than a defect, and Falieri was young in vigor and character, and still

full of life and strength. He was married a second time to presumably a

beautiful wife much younger than himself, though the chroniclers are not

agreed even on the subject of her name, whether she was a Gradenigo or a

Contarini. The well-known story of young Steno's insult to this lady and

to her old husband has found a place in all subsequent histories, but

there is no trace of it in the unpublished documents of the state.

The story goes that Michel Steno, one of those young and insubordinate

gallants who are a danger to every aristocratic state, having been

turned out of the presence of the Dogaressa for some unseemly freedom of

behavior, wrote upon the chair of the Doge in boyish petulance an

insulting taunt, such as might well rouse a high-tempered old man to

fury. According to Sanudo, the young man, on being brought before the

Forty,[56] confessed that he had thus avenged himself in a fit of

passion; and regard having been had to his age and the "heat of love"

which had been the cause of his original misdemeanor--a reason seldom

taken into account by the tribunals of the state--he was condemned to

prison for two months, and afterward to be banished for a year from

Venice.

The Doge took this light punishment greatly amiss, considering it,

indeed, as a further insult.

Sabellico says not a word of Michel Steno, or of this definite cause of

offence, and Romanin quotes the contemporary records to show that though

_Alcuni zovanelli fioli de gentiluomini di Venetia_ are supposed to have

affronted the Doge, no such story finds a place in any of them. But the

old man thus translated from active life and power, soon became bitterly

sensible in his new position that he was _senza parentado_, with few

relations, and flouted by the _giovinastri_, the dissolute young

gentlemen who swaggered about the Broglio in their finery, strong in the

support of fathers and uncles.

That he found himself, at the same time, shelved in his new rank,

powerless, and regarded as a nobody in the state where hitherto he had

been a potent signior--mastered in every action by the secret tribunal,

and presiding nominally in councils where his opinion was of little

consequence--is evident. And a man so well acquainted, and so long, with

all the proceedings of the state, who had seen consummated the shutting

out of the people, and since had watched through election after election

a gradual tightening of the bonds round the feet of the doge, would

naturally have many thoughts when he found himself the wearer of that

restricted and diminished crown.

He could not be unconscious of how the stream was going, nor unaware of

that gradual sapping of privilege and decreasing of power which even in

his own case had gone further than with his predecessor. Perhaps he had

noted with an indignant mind the new limits of the _promissione_, a

narrower charter than ever, when he was called upon to sign it. He had

no mind, we may well believe, to retire thus from the administration of

affairs. And when these giovinastri, other people's boys, the scum of

the gay world, flung their unsavory jests in the face of the old man who

had no son to come after him, the silly insults so lightly uttered, so

little thought of, the natural scoff of youth at old age, stung him to

the quick.

Old Falieri's heart burned within him at his own injuries and those of

his old comrades. How he was induced to head the conspiracy, and put his

crown, his life, and honor on the cast, there is no further information.

His fierce temper, and the fact that he had no powerful house behind him

to help to support his case, probably made him reckless. In April, 1355,

six months after his arrival in Venice as doge, the smouldering fire

broke out. Two of the conspirators were seized with compunction on the

eve of the catastrophe and betrayed the plot--one with a merciful motive

to serve a patrician he loved, the other with perhaps less noble

intentions--and, without a blow struck, the conspiracy collapsed. There

was no real heart in it, nothing to give it consistence; the hot passion

of a few men insulted, the variable gaseous excitement of wronged

commoners, and the ambition--if it was ambition--of one enraged and

affronted old man, without an heir to follow him or anything that could

make it worth his while to conquer.

An enterprise more wild was never undertaken. It was the passionate

stand of despair against force so overwhelming as to make mad the

helpless, yet not submissive, victims. The Doge, who no doubt in former

days had felt it to be a mere affair of the populace, a thing with which

a noble ambassador and proveditore had nothing to do, a struggle beneath

his notice, found himself at last, with fury and amazement, to be a

fellow-sufferer caught in the same toils. There seems no reason to

believe that Falieri consciously staked the remnant of his life on the

forlorn hope of overcoming that awful and pitiless power, with any real

hope of establishing his own supremacy. His aspect is rather that of a

man betrayed by passion, and wildly forgetful of all possibility in his

fierce attempt to free himself and get the upper hand. One cannot but

feel in that passion of helpless age and unfriendedness, something of

the terrible disappointment of one to whom the real situation of affairs

had never been revealed before; who had come home triumphant to reign

like the doges of old, and, only after the ducal cap was on his head and

the palace of the state had become his home, found out that the

doge--like the unconsidered plebeian--had been reduced to bondage; his

judgment and experience put aside in favor of the deliberations of a

secret tribunal, and the very boys, when they were nobles, at liberty to

jeer at his declining years.

The lesser conspirators, all men of the humbler sort--Calendario, the

architect, who was then at work upon the palace, a number of seamen, and

other little-known persons--were hanged; not like the greater criminals,

beheaded between the columns, but strung up--a horrible fringe--along

the side of the palazzo. The fate of Falieri himself is too generally

known to demand description. Calmed by the tragic touch of fate, the

Doge bore all the humiliations of his doom with dignity, and was

beheaded at the head of the stairs where he had sworn the promissione on

first assuming the office of doge.

What a contrast was this from that triumphant day when probably he felt

that his reward had come to him after the long and faithful service of

years. Death stills disappointment as well as rage, and Falieri is said

to have acknowledged the justice of his sentence. He had never made any

attempt to justify or defend himself, but frankly and at once avowed his

guilt and made no attempt to escape from its penalties. His body was

conveyed privately to the Church of St. Giovanni and St. Paolo, the

great "Zanipolo"--with which all visitors to Venice are familiar--and

was buried in secrecy and silence in the _atrio_ of a little chapel

behind the great church--where no doubt for centuries the pavement was

worn by many feet with little thought of those who lay below. Even from

that refuge his bones have been driven forth, but his name remains in

the corner of the Hall of the Great Council, where--with a certain

dramatic affectation--the painter-historians have painted a black veil

across the vacant place. "This is the place of Marino Falieri, beheaded

for his crimes," is all the record left of the Doge disgraced.

Was it a crime? The question is one which it is difficult to discuss

with any certainty. That Falieri desired to establish--as so many had

done in other cities--an independent despotism in Venice, seems entirely

unproved. It was the prevailing fear; the one suggestion which alarmed

everybody and made sentiment unanimous. But one of the special points

which are recorded by the chroniclers as working in him to madness, was

that he was _senza parentado_--without any backing of relationship or

allies--_i.e._, sonless, with no one to come after him. How little

likely then was an old man to embark on such a desperate venture for

self-aggrandizement merely. He had, indeed, a nephew who was involved in

his fate, but apparently not so deeply as to expose him to the last

penalty of the law.

The incident altogether points more to a sudden outbreak of the rage and

disappointment of an old public servant coming back from his weary

labors for the state in triumph and satisfaction to what seemed the

supreme reward; and finding himself no more than a puppet in the hands

of remorseless masters, subject to the scoffs of the younger generation,

with his eyes opened by his own suffering, perceiving for the first time

what justice there was in the oft-repeated protest of the people, and

how they and he alike were crushed under the iron heel of that oligarchy

to which the power of the people and that of the Prince were equally

obnoxious. The chroniclers of his time were so much at a loss to find

any reason for such an attempt on the part of a man, _non abbiando alcum

propinquo_, that they agree in attributing it to diabolical inspiration.

It was more probably that fury which springs from a sense of wrong,

which the sight of the wrongs of others raised to frenzy, and that

intolerable impatience of the impotent which is more harsh in its

hopelessness than the greatest hardihood. He could not but die for it,

but there seems no more reason to characterize this impossible attempt

as deliberate treason than to give the same name to many an alliance

formed between prince and people in other regions--the king and commons

of the early Stuarts, for example--against the intolerable exactions and

cruelty of an aristocracy too powerful to be faced alone by either.

CHARLES IV OF GERMANY PUBLISHES

HIS GOLDEN BULL

A.D. 1356

SIR ROBERT COMYN

The Golden Bull of Charles IV of Germany, Emperor of the

Holy Roman Empire, first published at the Diet of Nuremberg

in 1356, was a charter--sometimes called the "Magna Charta

of Germany"--regulating the election of the emperor. It was

called "golden" because the seal attached to the parchment

on which it was engrossed was of gold instead of the

customary lead. In a diet at Metz in the same year six

additional clauses were promulgated.

By some historians the origin of the imperial electoral

college is assigned to the year 1125, when at the election

of Lothair II certain of the nobles and church dignitaries

made a selection of candidates to be voted for. But until

the promulgation of the Golden Bull the constitution and

prerogatives of the college were never definitely

ascertained.

The personal traits and the languid reign of Charles IV have

been treated by historians with derision. He forgot the

general welfare of the empire in his eagerness to enrich his

own house and aggrandize his paternal kingdom of Bohemia.

The one remarkable law which emanated from him, and whereby

alone his reign is distinguished in the constitutional

history of the empire, is that embodied in the Golden Bull.

By this instrument the dignity of the electors was greatly

enhanced, and the disputes which had arisen between members

of the same house as to their right of suffrage were

terminated. The number of electors was absolutely restricted

to seven.

After a solemn invocation of the Trinity, a reprobation of the seven

deadly sins, and a pointed allusion to the seven candlesticks and the

seven gifts of the Holy Ghost, the Golden Bull proceeds to the subject

of the imperial election. It provides, in the first place, for the safe

conduct of the seven electors to and from Frankfort-on-the-Main, which

is fixed as the place of election; it directs the archbishop of Mainz to

summon the electors upon the death of the emperor, and regulates the

manner in which their proxies are to be appointed; it enjoins the

citizens of Frankfort to protect the assembled electors; and forbids

them to admit any stranger into the city during the election.

It next prescribes the form of oath to be taken by the electors; and

also forbids them to quit the city before the completion of the

election; and after thirty days restricts their diet to bread and water.

A majority of votes is to decide the election; and in case any elector

obtain three votes, his own vote is to be taken in his favor.

The precedence of the electors is thus settled: First, the archbishops

of Mainz, Cologne, and Treves; then the King of Bohemia, the Count

Palatine, the Duke of Saxony, and the Margrave of Brandenburg. The

Elector of Treves is to vote first; then the Elector of Cologne; then

the secular electors; and the Elector of Mainz is finally to collect the

votes and deliver his own.

The Elector of Cologne is to perform the coronation. At all feasts the

Margrave of Brandenburg, as grand chamberlain, is to present the Emperor

with water to wash; the King of Bohemia, as cup-bearer, is to offer the

goblet of wine; the Count Palatine, as grand steward, is to set the

first dish on the table; and the Duke of Saxony is to officiate as grand

marshal.

The Count Palatine and the Duke of Saxony are declared vicars of the

empire during the vacancy of the throne. An exclusive jurisdiction is

guaranteed to the electors; and their precedence over all other princes

of Germany is enforced.

The right of voting is vested in the eldest son of a deceased elector,

provided he have attained the age of eighteen; and during the minority,

the guardianship and vote are vested in the next kinsman of the

deceased.

If one of the lay electorates become vacant by default of heirs, it

shall revert to the Emperor, and be by him disposed of--Bohemia

excepted, where the vacancy is to be supplied by ancient mode of

election.

The electors are invested with the possession of all mines discovered

within their respective territories. They are authorized to give refuge

to the Jews, and to receive dues payable within their states. They are

also privileged to coin money, and to purchase lands subject to the

feudal rights of the sovereign.

A yearly assembly of the electors, in one of the imperial cities, is

enjoined.

All privileges granted to any city or community prejudicial to the

rights of the electors are revoked. All fraudulent resignations of fiefs

by vassals, with intent to attack their lords, are declared void. All

leagues, associations, and confederacies, not sanctioned by law, are

made punishable by fine; and all burgesses and subjects of princes and

nobles are to adhere to their original subjection, and not to claim any

rights or exemptions as burgesses of any city unless actually domiciled

therein.

Challenges, with design of destroying another's property or committing

any outrage, are prohibited; and all challenges are to be given three

days before the onset.

The forms of summoning electors, and of their delegation of proxies, are

laid down. And the right of voting, as well as all other rights, is

declared inseparably incident to the electoral principality.

On grand occasions the Duke of Saxony is to carry the sword; the Count

Palatine, the globe; the Margrave of Brandenburg, the sceptre. In

celebrating mass before the Emperor, the benedictions are to be

pronounced by the senior spiritual elector present.

All persons conspiring against the lives of the electors are declared

guilty of leze-majesty, and shall forfeit their lives and possessions.

The lives of their sons, though justly forfeited, are spared only by the

particular bounty of the Emperor; but they are declared incapable of

holding any property, honor, or dignity, and doomed to perpetual

poverty. The daughters are permitted to enjoy one-fourth of their

mother's succession.

The secular principalities, Bohemia, the Palatinate, the duchy of

Saxony, and the margravate of Brandenburg, are declared indivisible and

entire, descendible in the male line.

On all the solemn occasions the electors shall attend the Emperor, and

the arch-chancellors shall carry the seals. And the bull then proceeds

minutely to point out the manner in which the electors are to exercise

their ministerial functions at the imperial banquet; and regulates the

order and disposition of the imperial and electoral tables.

Frankfort is again declared as the place of election; Aix-la-Chapelle,

of coronation; and Nuremberg, for holding the first royal court.

The electors are exempted from all payments on receiving their fiefs

from their sovereign. But other princes are to pay certain fees, etc.,

to the imperial officers.

Lastly, the secular electors are enjoined to instruct their sons in the

Latin, Italian, and Slavonic tongues.

The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 07 · 第 15 / 38 段