CHAPTER XV

THE EIGHTEENTH AND NINETEENTH CENTURIES: FRANCE

Of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: Fontenelle, Bayle. Of the

Eighteenth: Poets: La Motte, Jean Baptiste Rousseau, Voltaire, etc. Prose

Writers: Montesquieu, Voltaire, Buffon, Jean Jacques Rousseau, etc. Of

the Nineteenth Century: Poets: Lamartine, Victor Hugo, Musset, Vigny,

etc.; Prose Writers: Chateaubriand, Michelet, George Sand, Mérimée,

Renan, etc.

FONTENELLE.--The eighteenth century, which was announced, and announced

with great precision, by La Bruyère, was inaugurated by his enemy

Fontenelle. Fontenelle, nephew of Corneille, began with despicable

trifles, eclogues, operas, stilted tragedies, letters of a dandy, so he

might be justly regarded as an inferior Voiture. Very soon, because he

possessed the passion of the eighteenth century for science and

free-thought, he showed himself to be a serious man, and because he had

wit he showed himself an amusing serious man, which is rare. His

_Dialogues of the Dead_ were very humorous and, at the same time, in many

passages profound; he wrote his _Discourses on the Plurality of_

(Habitable) _Worlds_; then because he was perpetual secretary of the

Academy of Sciences, came his charming and often astonishing _Eulogies of

Sages_, which ought to be regarded as the best existent history of

science in the seventeenth century and in the eighteenth up to 1740.

BAYLE.--Bayle, a Frenchman who lived in Holland on account of religion, a

journalist and lexicographer, in his _News of the Republic of Letters_

and in his immense _Dictionary_, gave proof of broad erudition about all

earthly questions, especially philosophical and religious, guiding his

readers to absolute scepticism. Fontenelle and Bayle are the two heralds

who opened the procession of the eighteenth century. Successively must

now be examined first the poets and then the prose writers of the first

half of that era.

LA MOTTE.--La Motte, as celebrated in his own time as he is forgotten in

ours, was lyricist, fabulist, dramatic orator, epical even after a

certain fashion. He wrote odes that were deadly cold, fables that were

often quite witty but affected and laboured, comedies sufficiently

mediocre, of which _The Magnificent Lover_ was the most remarkable,

and a tragedy, _Inez de Castro_, which was excellent and enjoyed one of

the greatest successes of the French stage. Finally, becoming the

partisan of the modernists against the classicists, he abridged the

_Iliad_ of Homer into a dozen books as frigid as his own lyric poems. He

had parodoxical ideas in literature, and, being a poet, or believing

himself one, he considered that verse enervated thought and that

sentiments should only be written in prose. It was against these

tendencies that Voltaire so vigorously reacted.

J.B. ROUSSEAU; POMPIGNAN.--Beside La Motte, being more gifted as a poet,

Jean Baptiste Rousseau was conspicuous. He wrote lyrical poems which were

cold as lyrics but were well composed and, sometimes at least, attained a

certain degree of eloquence. From Malherbe to Lamartine, lyrical poetry

was almost completely neglected by French poets, or at least very badly

treated. Jean Baptiste Rousseau had the advantage of being nearly

solitary and for approximately century was regarded as the greatest

national lyrical poet.

Le Franc de Pompignan has endured much ridicule, not the least being for

a certain naive vanity perceptible directly he passed from the south to

the north of France; but he had some knowledge; he was acquainted with

Hebrew, then a sufficiently rare accomplishment, and he was an assiduous

student of classic literature. His tragedy, _Dido_, succeeded; his

_Sacred Songs_ enjoyed popularity, no matter what Voltaire might say,

and deserved their success; in his odes, which were too often cold, he

rarely succeeded--only once triumphantly, in his ode on the death of Jean

Baptiste Rousseau.

THE _HENRIADE_.--So far as poets, strictly speaking, were concerned, the

foregoing are all that have to be indicated in the first half of the

eighteenth century, except the ingenious and frigid _Henriade_ of

Voltaire.

DRAMATIC POETS.--To counterbalance, the dramatic poets are numerous and

not without merit. Let us recall _Inez de Castro_ by De la Motte.

Campistron, the feeble pupil of Racine (and, moreover, there could be no

pupil of Racine, so original was the latter, so closely was his genius

associated with his mind), perpetrated numerous tragedies and operas

which enjoyed the success obtained by all imitative works: that is, a

success which arouses no discussion, and which today appears to be the

climax of tediousness.

CRÉBILLON.--Crébillon followed, vigorous, energetic, violently shaking

the nerves, master of horror and of terrors, not lacking some analogy

with Shakespeare, but without delicacy or depth, never even giving a

thought to being psychological or a moralist, writing badly and to a

certain extent meriting the epithet of "the barbarian" bestowed on him

by Voltaire.

The latter was infatuated with the drama, having the feeling for

beautiful themes and for new and original topics, adapting them to

the stage with sufficient aptitude, delighting, in addition, in pomp,

mimicry, and decorativeness, and causing tragedy to lean towards

opera, which in his day was no bad thing; but weak in execution, never

creating characters because he could not escape from himself, as moderate

in psychology and morality as Crébillon himself and replacing analysis of

passion by these and philosophical commonplaces. He left tragic dramas

which until about 1815 enjoyed success, but which then fell into a

disregard from which there is no probability they will ever emerge.

COMIC POETS.--The comic poets of this period were highly agreeable. The

most notable were Destouches, Regnard, La Chaussée. Destouches was the

very type of the comic writers of the eighteenth century already alluded

to, who took a portrait by La Bruyère and turned it into a comedy, and

that is what was called a comedy of character. Thus he wrote _The

Braggart_, _The Irresolute_, _The Ungrateful_, _The Backbiter_, _The

Spendthrift_, etc. Sometimes he took pains to be a trifle more original,

as in _The False Agnes_, _The Married Philosopher_; sometimes he borrowed

a subject from a foreign literature and adapted it fairly dexterously for

the Gallic stage, as in _The Impertinent Inquisitive_, taken from _Don

Quixote_ and _The Night Drum_, borrowed from an English author. His

versification was dexterous and correct without possessing other merit.

REGNARD.--Regnard, on the contrary, was an original genius, though

frequently imitative of Molière. He possessed the comic spirit, gaiety,

animation, the sense of drollery, and a prodigious capacity for humorous

verse of great flexibility and incredible ease, highly superior in point

of form to that of Boileau and even of Molière, for he suggests a Scarron

perfected by Molière himself and by the Italian poets. Still alive and

probably imperishable are such works as _The Gamester_, _The Universal

Legatee_, _The Unexpected Return_.

THE DRAMA: LA CHAUSSÉE.--La Chaussée possessed a vein of the popular

novel, the serial, as we should say, and at the same time a taste for the

stage. The result was he created a new species, which in itself is no

small achievement. He created _the drama_: that is, the stage-play

wherein common people, and no longer kings and princes, affect us by

their misfortunes. This has been called by all possible names; when it

is a comedy it is described as a tearful comedy; when a tragedy, as a

dramatic tragedy. This is the drama we have known in France for a hundred

and fifty years; such as it already existed in the sixteenth century

under the title of the morality play, such as Corneille, who foresaw

everything, anticipated and predicted in his preface to _Don Sancho_: "I

would rather say, sir, that tragedy should excite pity and fear, and that

in its essentials, since there is necessity for definition. Now if it be

true that this latter feeling is only excited in us when we see those

like ourselves suffer, and that their misfortunes put us in fear of

similar calamities, is it not also true that we can be more strongly

moved by disasters arriving to people of our own rank, having resemblance

to ourselves, than by the picture of the overthrow from their thrones of

the greatest monarchs, who can have no relation to us except in so far as

we are susceptible to the passions that overwhelmed them, which is not

always the case?" This domestic tragedy La Chaussée wrote in verse, which

is not against French rules, and which has been done by dramatists a

hundred and twenty years later; but it is probably an error, being even

more unlikely that citizens would express themselves in metre than that

kings and heroes should give utterance with a certain solemnity which

entails rhythm. Thus he wrote _The Fashionable Prejudice_, _The School of

Friends_, _Melanide_, very pathetic, _The School of Mothers_, etc. It

must be stated that he wrote his plays in verse somewhat systematically;

he had made his first appearance in literature by a defence of

versification against the doctrines of La Motte.

PIRON.--According to the old system, but in original verse, Piron, after

having met with scant success in tragedy, wrote the delicious

_Metromania_ which, with _The Turcaret_ of Le Sage, _The Bad Man_ of

Gresset, the masterpieces of Marivaux and the two great comedies

of Beaumarchais rank among the seven or eight superior comedies produced

in the eighteenth century.

GREAT PROSE WRITERS: MONTESQUIEU.--In prose, writers, and even great

writers, were abundant at this period. Immediately after Fontenelle and

Bayle appeared Montesquieu, sharp, malicious, satirical, already

profound, in _The Persian Letters_, a great political philosopher and

master of jurisprudence in _The Spirit of Laws_, a great philosophical

historian in _The Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans_. The influence of

Montesquieu on Voltaire, no matter what the latter may have said; on

Rousseau, however silent the latter may have been about it; on Mably, on

Raynal, on the encyclopaedists, on a large portion of the men in the

French Revolution, on the greatest minds of the nineteenth century, has

been profound and difficult to measure. As writer he was concise,

collected, and striking, seeking the motive and often finding it, seeking

the formula and invariably finding it--Tacitus mingled with Sallust.

LE SAGE; SAINT-SIMON.--In considering Le Sage and Saint-Simon, it is not,

perhaps, the one who is instinctively thought of as a novelist who really

was the greater romancer. They each wrote at the same time as

Montesquieu. Saint-Simon narrated the age of Louis XIV as an eyewitness,

both with spirit and with a feeling for the picturesque that were alike

inimitable, expressed in a highly characteristic fashion, which was often

incorrect, always incredibly vigorous, energetic, and masterful. Le Sage,

in the best of all French styles, that of the purest seventeenth century,

narrated Spanish stories in which he mingled many observations made in

Paris, and set the model for the realistic novel in his admirable _Gil

Blas_. As a dramatist he will be dealt with later.

MARIVAUX; PRÉVOST.--Marivaux also essayed the realistic novel in his very

curious _Marianne_, full of types drawn from contemporary life and drawn

with an art which was less condensed but as exact as that of La Bruyère,

and in his _Perverted Peasant_ with an art which was more gross, but

still highly interesting.

The Abbé Prévost, much inferior, much overpraised, generally insipid in

his novels of adventure, once found a good theme, _Manon Lescaut_, and,

though writing as badly as was his wont, evoked tears which, it may be

said, still flow.

HISTORY: DRAMA.--In history Voltaire furnished a model of vivid, rapid,

truly epic narration in his _History of Charles XII_, and an example, at

least, of exact documentation and of contemporaneous history studied with

zeal and passion in his _Philosophical Letters on England_. On the stage,

in prose there were the pretty, witty, and biting light comedies of

Dancourt, De Brueys and Palaprat, and Dufresny, then the delicious drama,

at once fantastic and perceptive, romantic and psychological, of

Marivaux, who, in _The Legacy_, _The False Confidences_, _The Test_,

_The Game of Love and of Shame_, showed himself no less than the true

heir of Racine and the only one France has ever had.

VOLTAIRE.--In the second portion of the eighteenth century, Voltaire

reigned. He multiplied historical studies (_Century of Louis XIV_),

philosophies (_Philosophical Dictionary_), dramas (_Zaïre_, _Mérope_,

_Alzire_ [before 1750], _Rome Saved_, _The Chinese Orphan_, _Tancred_,

_Guèbres_, _Scythia_, _Irene_), comedies (_Nanine_, _The Prude_),

romances(_Tales and Novels_), judicial exquisitions (the Calas, Labarre,

and Sirven cases), and articles, pamphlets, and fugitive papers on

all conceivable subjects.

THE PHILOSOPHERS.--But the second generation of philosophers was now

reached. There was Diderot, philosophical romancer (_The Nun_, _James the

Fatalist_), art critic(_Salons_), polygraphist (collaboration in the

Encyclopaedia); there was Jean Jacques Rousseau, philosophic novelist in

_The New Héloise_, publicist in his discourse against _Literature and the

Arts and Origin of Inequality_, schoolmaster in his _Emilius_, severe

moralist in his _Letters to M. d'Alembert on the Spectacles_,

half-romancer, charming, impassioned, and passion-inspiring in the

autobiography which he called his Confessions; there was Duclos,

interesting though rather tame in his _Considerations on the Manners of

this Century_; there was Grimm, an acute and subtle critic of the highest

intelligence in his _Correspondence_; then Condillac, precise,

systematic, restrained, but infinitely clear in the best of diction in

his _Treatise on the Sensations_; finally Turgot, the philosophical

economist, in his _Treatise on the Formation and Distribution of

Wealth_.

BUFFON; MARMONTEL; DELILLE.--Philosophy, meditation on great problems,

filled almost all the literary horizon, while scientific literature

embraced a score of illustrious representatives, of which the most

impressive was Buffon, with his _Natural History_. Nevertheless, in

absolute literature there were also names to cite: Marmontel gave his

_Moral Tales_, his _Belisarius_, his _Incas_, and his _Elements of

Literature_.

Delille, with his translation in verse of the _Georgics_ of Virgil,

commenced a noble poetic career which he pursued until the nineteenth

century; Gilbert wrote some mordant satires which recalled Boileau, and

some farewells to life which are among the best lyrics; Saint

Lambert sang of _The Seasons_ with felicity, and Roucher treated the same

theme with more vivid sensibility.

THE STAGE.--On the stage, a little before 1750. Gresset gave his

_Wicked Man_, which was witty and in such felicitous metre that it

carried the tradition of great comedy in verse; Diderot, theorist and

creator of the drama in prose, followed La Chaussée, and produced _The

Father of a Family_, _The Natural Son_, and _Is He Good, Is He Bad_? being

the portrait of himself. Innumerable dramas by the fertile Mercier and a

score of others followed, including Beaumarchais, himself a devotee of

the drama, but only able to succeed in comedy, wherein he gave his two

charming works, _The Barber of Seville_ and _The Marriage of Figaro_.

ANDRÉ CHÉNIER.--Almost on the verge of the Revolution, quite unexpectedly

there emerged a really great poet, André Chénier, marvellously gifted in

every way. As the poet of love he recalled Catullus and Tibullus; in

political lyricism he suggested d'Aubigny, though with more fervour; as

elegiac poet he possessed a grace that was truly Grecian; as the poet of

nature he employed the large manner of Lucretius; in polemical prose he

was remarkably eloquent. Struck down whilst quite young amid the turmoil

of the Revolution, he bequeathed immortal fragments. No doubt he would

have been the greatest French poet between Racine and Lamartine.

BERNARDIN DE SAINT-PIERRE.--In prose, his contemporary, Bernardin de

Saint-Pierre, primarily was a man of genius, since he wrote that immortal

idyllic romance, _Paul and Virginia_; subsequently he became a gracious

and amiable pupil of Jean Jacques Rousseau, being smitten with the

sentiment of nature in his _Harmonies of Nature_; finally he attained

a great importance in literary history as the creator of exotic

literature through the descriptions he wrote of many lands: Asia,

African isles traversed and studied by him, Russia, and Germany.

THE REVOLUTIONARY ORATORS.--During the revolutionary period may be

pointed out the great orators of the Assembly: Mirabeau, Barnave, Danton,

Vergniaud, Robespierre; the ill-starred authors of national songs:

Marie Joseph Chénier; the author of the _Marseillaise_, Rouget de Lisle,

who only succeeded on the day that he wrote it. And so we reach the

nineteenth century.

THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.--At the commencement of a century which was so

brilliant from the literary aspect, James Delille was despotic: his

earlier efforts have already been attended to. A skilled versifier, but

without fire or many ideas, he made cultured translations from Virgil and

Milton, wrote perennially descriptive poems, such as _The Man in the

Fields_, _The Gardens_, etc., and a witty satirical poem on

_Conversation_, which, in our opinion, was the best thing he wrote.

GREAT POETS: LAMARTINE.--Great poets were to come. Aroused, without

doubt, by the poetic genius of the prose writer Chateaubriand, the first

generation of the romantics was formed by Lamartine, Victor Hugo, and

Alfred de Vigny. Romanticism was the preponderance of imagination and

sensibility over reason and observation. Lamartine rebathed poetry in its

ancient and eternal sources: love, religion, and the sentiment of nature.

In his _Meditations_, his _Harmonies_, and his _Contemplations_, he

reawoke feelings long slumbering, and profoundly moved the hearts of men.

In _Jocelyn_ he widened his scope, and, emerging from himself, narrated,

as he imagined it, the story of the soul of a priest during the

Revolution, and subsequently in the obscurity of a rural parish; in

_The Fall of an Angel_ he reverted to the life of primaeval man as he

conceived it to be when humanity was still barbarous. Apart from his

poetic works, he wrote _The History of the Girondins_, which is a

romanesque history of almost the whole of the Revolution, some novels,

some autobiographic episodes, and a few discourses on literature.

VICTOR HUGO.--Victor Hugo, though less sensitive than Lamartine but more

imaginative, began with lyrical poems which were somewhat reminiscent of

the classical manner, then went on to pictures of the East, thence to

meditations on what happened to himself, and on all subjects (_Autumn

Leaves_, _Lights and Shades_); next, in full possession of his genius, he

dwelt on great philosophical meditations in his _Contemplations_, and in

_The Legend of the Centuries_ gave that epic fragment which is a picture

of history. His was one of the most powerful imaginations that the world

has ever seen, as well as a _creator of style_, who made a style for

himself all in vision and colour, and also in melody and orchestration.

Although in prose he lacked one part of his resources, he utilised

the rest magnificently, and _Notre Dame_ and _The Miserable_ are works

which excite admiration, at least in parts. Later, he will be dealt with

as a dramatist.

ALFRED DE VIGNY.--Alfred de Vigny was the most philosophical of these

three great poets, though inferior to the other two in creative

imaginativeness. He meditated deeply on the existence of evil on earth,

on the misfortunes of man, and the sadness of life, and his most

despairing songs, which were also his most beautiful, left a profound

echo in the hearts of his contemporaries. Some of his poems, such as

_The Bottle in the Sea_, _The Shepherd's House_, _The Fury of Samson_,

are among the finest works of French literature.

MUSSET; THÉOPHILE GAUTIER.--The second generation of romanticism, which

appeared about 1830, possessed Alfred de Musset and Théophile Gautier as

chief representatives. They bore little mutual resemblance, be it said,

the former only knowing how to sing about himself, his pleasures, his

illusions, his angers, and, above all, his sorrows, always with sincerity

and in accents that invariably charmed and sometimes lacerated; the

latter, supremely artist, always seeking the fair exterior and delighting

in reproducing it as though he were a painter, a sculptor, or a musician,

and excellent and dexterous in these "transpositions of art," whether

they were in verse or prose.

THE PROSE WRITERS: CHATEAUBRIAND.--The French prose writers of this first

half of the nineteenth century were emphatically poets, as had also

already been Jean Jacques Rousseau and even Buffon. Imagination,

sensibility, and the sentiment for nature were the mistresses of their

faculties. Chateaubriand was the promoter of all the literary movement

of the nineteenth century, alike in prose and poetry. He was a literary

theorist, an epic poet in prose, traveller, polemist, orator. His great

literary theory was in _The Genius of Christianity_, and consisted in

supporting that all true poetic beauties lay in Christianity. His epic

poems in prose are _The Natchez_, a picture of the customs of American

Indians, _The Martyrs_, a panorama of the struggle of paganism at its

close and of Christianity at its beginning; his travels were _The Voyage

in America_ and _The Itinerary from Paris to Jerusalem_. Member of the

parliamentary assemblies, ambassador and minister, he wrote and spoke in

the most brilliant and impassioned manner on the subjects that he took

up. Finally, falling back on himself, as he had never ceased to do more

or less all through his career, he left, in his marvellous _Memoirs from

Beyond the Tomb_, a posthumous work which is, perhaps, his masterpiece.

His infinitely supple and variegated style formed a continuous artistic

miracle, so harmonious and musical was it more musical even than that of

Jean Jacques Rousseau.

MME. DE STAËL.--At the same time, though she died long before him, Mme.

de Staël, by her curious and interesting, though never affecting, novels,

_Delphine_ and _Corinne_, by her dissertations on various serious

subjects, by her work on Germany, which initiated the French into the

habits and literature of neighbours they were ill acquainted with, also

directed the minds of men into new paths, and she was prodigal of ideas

which she had almost always borrowed, but which she thoroughly

understood, profoundly reconsidered, and to which she imparted an

appearance of originality even in the eyes of those who had given them to

her.

THE HISTORIANS.--Even the historians of this first half of the century

were poets: Augustin Thierry, who reconstituted scientifically but

imaginatively _The Merovingian Era_; Michelet, pupil of Vico, who saw in

history the development of an immense poem and cast over his account of

the Middle Ages the fire and feverishness of his ardent imagination and

tremulous sensitiveness. Guizot and Thiers can be left apart, for they

were statesmen by education and, although capable of passion, sought the

one to rationally generalise and "discipline history," as was said, the

other solely to capture facts accurately and to set them out clearly in

orderly fashion.

THE PHILOSOPHERS.--The philosophers were not sheltered from this

contagion, and if Cousin and his eclectic school loved to attach

themselves to the seventeenth century both in mind and style, Lamennais,

first in his _Essay on Indifference_, then in his _Study of a

Philosophy_ and in his _Words of a Believer_, impassioned, impetuous, and

febrile, underwent the influence of romanticism, but also gave to the

romantics the greater portion of the ideas they put in verse.

THE NOVEL.--As for the novel, it was only natural that it should be

deeply affected by the spirit of the new school. George Sand wrote

lyrical novels, if the phrase may be used--and, as I think, it is here

the accurate expression--entitled _Indiana_, _Valentine_, _Mauprat_, and

especially _Lelia_. She was to impart wisdom later on.

It even happened that a mind born to see reality in an admirably accurate

manner, saw it so only by reason of the times, or at least partly due to

the times, associated it with a magnifying but deforming imagination

converting it into a literary megalomania; and this was the case of

Honoré de Balzac.

NON-ROMANTIC LITERATURE.--Nevertheless, as was only natural, throughout

the whole of the romantic epoch there was an entire literature which did

not submit to its influence, and simply carried on the tradition of

the eighteenth century. In poetry there was the witty, malicious, and

very often highly exalted Béranger, whose songs are almost always

excellent songs and sometimes are odes; and there was also the able and

dexterous but frigid Casimir Delavigne. In prose there was Benjamin

Constant, supremely oratorical and a very luminous orator, also

a religious philosopher in his work _On Religions_, and a novelist in his

admirable _Adolphus_, which was semi-autobiographical.

Classical also were Joseph de Maistre, in his political considerations

(_Evenings in St. Petersburg_), and, in fiction, Mérimée, accurate,

precise, trenchant, and cultured; finally in criticism, Sainte-Beuve, who

began, it is true, by being the theorist and literary counsellor of

romanticism, but who was soon freed from the spell, almost from 1830, and

became author of _Port Royal_. Though possessing a wide and receptive

mind because he was personified intelligence, he was decisively classical

in his preferences, sentiments, ideas, and even in his style.

Stendhal, pure product of the eighteenth century, and even exaggerating

the spirit of that century in the dryness of his soul and of his style, a

pure materialist writing with precision and with natural yet intentional

nakedness, possessed valuable gifts of observation, and in his famous

novel, _Red and Black_, in the first part of the _Chartreuse of Parma_,

and in his _Memoirs of a Tourist_, knew how to draw characters with

exactness, sobriety, and power, and to set them in reliefs that were

remarkably rare.

THE STAGE.--The drama was very brilliant during this first half of the

nineteenth century. The struggle was lively for thirty or thirty-five

years between the classicists and the romanticists; the classics

defending their citadel, the French stage, much more by their polemics in

the newspapers than by the unimportant works which they brought to the

_Comédie française_, the romantics here producing nearly all the plays of

Hugo (_Hernani_, _Marion de Lorme_, _Ruy Blas_, _The Burghers_, etc.),

and the works of Vigny(_Othello_, _Marshal d'Ancre_), as well as the

dramas of Dumas (_Henry III and his Court_, etc.). Between the two

schools, both of which were on the stage nearer to the modern than to the

antique, the dexterous Casimir Delavigne, with almost invariable success,

gave _Marino Faliero_, _Louis XI_, _The Children of Edward_, _Don Juan of

Austria_, and _Princess Aurelia_, which was pretty, but without

impassioned interest.

A veritable dramatic genius, although destitute of style, of elevation of

thought and of ideas, but a prodigious constructor of well-made plays,

was Eugène Scribe, who, by his dramas and comedies, as well as the

libretti of operas, was the chief purveyor to the French stage between

1830 and 1860.

ROMANTICISM AND REALISM.--So far as pure literature was concerned, the

second half of the nineteenth century was divided between enfeebled but

persistent romanticism and realism. Théophile Gautier, in 1853, gave his

_Enamels and Cameos_, his best poetic work, and later (1862) his

_Captain Fracasse_. Hugo wrote his _Miserables_, the second and third

_Legends of the Centuries_, _Songs of the Streets and the Woods_, etc.

A third romantic generation, of which Théodore de Banville was the most

brilliant representative, and which proceeded far more from Gautier than

from Hugo or De Musset, pushed verbal and rhythmic virtuosity to the

limit and perhaps beyond. Then great or highly distinguished poets

appeared.

FAMOUS POETS.--Leconte de Lisle, philosophical poet, attracted by Indian

literature, by pessimism, by the taste for nothingness, and the thirst

for death, forcing admiration by his sculptural form and majestic rhythm;

Sully-Prudhomme, another philosopher, especially psychological,

manipulating the lyrical elegy with much art and, above all, infusing

into it a grave, sad, and profound sensibility which would have awakened

the affection and earned the respect of Catullus, Tibullus, and

Lucretius; Francis Coppée, the poet of the joys and sorrows of the lowly,

a dexterous versifier too, and possessed of a sincerity so candid as to

make the reader forget that there is art in it; Baudelaire, inquisitive

about rare and at times artificial sensations, possessing a laborious

style, but sometimes managing to produce a deep impression either morbid

or lugubrious, considered by an entire school which is still extant as

one of the greatest poets within the whole range of French literature;

Verlaine, extremely unequal, often detestable and contemptible, but

suddenly charming and touching or revealing a religious feeling that

suggests a clerk of the Middle Ages; Catulle Mendès, purely romantic,

wholly virtuoso, but an astonishingly dexterous versifier. To these poets

some highly curious literary dandies set themselves in opposition, being

desirous of renovating the poetic art by ascribing more value to the

sound of words than to their meaning, striving to make a music of poesy

and, in a general way--which is their chief characteristic--being

difficult to understand. They gave themselves the name of symbolists, and

accepted that of decadents; they regarded Stephen Mallarmé either as

their chief or as a friend who did them honour. This school has been

dignified by no masterpieces and will probably ere long be forgotten.

REALISTIC LITERATURE.--Confronting all this literature, which had a

romantic origin even when it affected scorn of the men of 1830, was

developed an entire realistic literature composed almost exclusively of

writers in prose, but of prose imbued with poetry written by some who had

read the romantics and who would not have achieved what they did had

romanticism not already existed, a fact which they themselves have

not denied, and which is now almost universally accepted. Flaubert, whose

masterpiece, _Madame Bovary_, is dated 1857, was very precisely divided

between the two schools; he possessed the taste for breadth of eloquence,

for the adventurous, and for Oriental colouring, and also the taste for

the common, vulgar, well visualised, thoroughly assimilated truth,

tersely portrayed in all its significance. But as he has succeeded

better, at least in the eyes of his contemporaries, as a realist than as

a man with imagination, he passes into history as the founder of realism

always conditionally upon considering Balzac as possessing much of the

vigorous realism which provided the impulse and furnished models.

NATURALISM.--From the realism of Flaubert was born the naturalism of

Zola, which is the same thing more grossly expressed. Also by his

energetic, violent, and tenacious talent, as well as by a weighty though

powerful imagination, he exercised over his contemporaries a kind of

fascination which it would be puerile to regard as an infatuation for

which there was no cause.

More refined and even extremely delicate, though himself also fond of the

small characteristic fact; possessed, too, with a graceful and gracious

sensibility, Alphonse Daudet often charmed and always interested us in

his novels, which are the pictorial anecdotes of the Parisian world at

the close of the second Empire and the opening of the third Republic.

The brothers De Goncourt also enjoyed notable success, being themselves

absorbed in the exceptional deed and the exceptional character whilst

possessing a laboured style which is sometimes seductive because of its

unlooked-for effects.

THE POSITIVISTS.--Two great men filled with their renown an epoch already

so brilliant; namely, Renan and Taine, both equally historians and

philosophers. Renan composed _The History of the Children of Israel_ and

_The Origins of Christianity_, as well as various works of general

philosophy, of which the most celebrated is entitled _Philosophical

Dialogues_. Taine wrote the history of _The Origins of Contemporary

France_: that is, the history of the French Revolution, and sundry

philosophical works of which the principal are _On Intelligence_ and

_The French Philosophers of the Eighteenth Century_. Both were

"positivists," that is to say, elevating Auguste Comte, who has his place

in the history of philosophy, but not here, because he was not a good

writer; both were positivists, but Renan possessed a lively and profound

sense of the grandeur and the moral beauty of Christianity, Taine being

imbued with more philosophic strictness. Renan, with infinite flexibility

of intelligence, applied himself to understand thoroughly and always

(with some excess) to bring home to us the great figures of the Bible,

the Gospels, and the early Christians, as well as their foes down to the

time of Marcus Aurelius. Further, he affirmed science to possess

_unique_ value in his _Future of Science_; elsewhere, under the

similitude of "dreams," he indulged in conceptions, hypotheses, and

metaphysical imaginations which were voluntarily rash and infinitely

seductive. As always happens, he possessed the style of his mind, supple,

sinuous, undulating, astonishingly plastic, insatiable, and charming,

evoking the comment, "That is admirably done and it is impossible to know

with what it is done."

TAINE.--Taine, more rigid, accumulating documents and methodically

arranging them in a method that refuses to be concealed, advances in a

rectilineal order, step by step, and with a measured gait, to a solid

truth which he did not wish to be either evasive or complex. Highly

pessimistic and a little affecting to be so, just as Renan was optimistic

and much affected being so, he believed in the evil origin of man and of

the necessity for him to be drastically curbed if he is to remain

inoffensive. He has written a history of the Revolution wherein he has

refused admiration and respect for the crimes then committed, which is

why posterity now begins to be very severe upon him. His learned style is

wholly artificial, coloured without his being a colourist, composed of

metaphors prolonged with difficulty, yet remaining singularly imposing

and powerful. He was a curious philosopher, an upright, severe, and

rather systematic historian, solid and laboriously original as a

writer.

BRUNETIÈRE.--Brunetière, of the great French thinkers before our

contemporaneous epoch, was critic, literary historian, philosopher,

theologian, and orator. As critic, he defended classic tradition against

bold innovations, and, especially, moral literature against licentious or

gross literature; as a literary historian he renovated literary history

by the introduction of the curious, audacious, and fruitful theory of

evolution, and his _Manual of the History of French Literature_ was a

masterpiece; as philosopher he imparted clearness and precision into the

system of Auguste Comte, whose disciple he was; as theologian, exceeding

Comte and utilising him, he added weight to Catholicism in France by

finding new and decisive "reasons for belief"; as orator he raised his

marvellously eloquent tones in France, Switzerland, and America, making

more than a hundred "fighting speeches." Since the death of Renan and

Taine, he has been the sole director of French thought, which he

continues to guide by his books and by the diffusion of his thought among

the most vigorous, serious, and meditative minds of the day.

THE CONTEMPORANEOUS DRAMA.--The drama, since 1850, has been almost

exclusively written in prose. Emil Augier, however, composed some

comedies and dramas in verse and in verse particularly suited to the

stage; but the major portion of his work is in prose, whilst Alexander

Dumas and Sardou have written exclusively in prose. Augier and Dumas came

from Balzac, and remained profoundly realistic, which was particularly

suitable to authors of comedy. They studied the manners of the second

Empire and depicted them wittily; they studied the social questions which

agitated educated minds at this time and drew useful inspiration. Augier

leant towards good middle-class common-sense, which did not prevent him

from having plenty of wit. Dumas was more addicted to paradox and

possessed as much ability as his rival. Victorien Sardou, as dexterous a

dramatic constructor as Scribe, and who sometimes rose above this,

dragged his easy tolerance from the grand historic drama to the comedy of

manners, to light comedy and to insignificant comedy with prodigious

facility and inexhaustible fertility.

The most admired living authors, whom we shall be content only to name

because they are living, are poets: Edmond Rostand, author of

_Loiterings_; Edmond Haraucourt, author of _The Naked Soul_ and _The Hope

of the World_; Jean Aicard, author of _Miette el Noré_; Jean Richepin,

author of _Césarine_, _Caresses_, _Blasphemies_, etc.; in fiction, Paul

Bourget, Marcel Prévost, René Bazin, Bordeaux, Boylesve, Henri de

Régnier; in history, Ernest Lavisse, Aulard, Seignobos, D'Haussonville;

in philosophy, Boutroux, Bergson, Théodule Ribot, Fouillée, Izoulet; in

the drama, Paul Hervieu, Lavedan, Bataille, Brieux, Porto-Riche,

Bernstein, Wolff, Tristan Bernard, Edmond Rostand, author of _Cyrano de

Bergerac_ and of _The Aiglon_; as orators, Alexander Ribot, De Mun

Poincaré, Jaurès, etc.

Initiation into Literature · 第 15 / 21 章