CHAPTER XIII.

ROUND TOWERS.

OPINIONS FORMERLY CURRENT WITH REGARD TO THE ORIGIN AND USES OF

THE ROUND TOWERS--THEIR CHARACTERISTICS--DOORWAYS, WINDOWS AND

APERTURES--EXAMPLES AT CLONDALKIN, MONASTERBOICE, KILDARE,

DEVENISH.

Round towers of about 18 feet in external diameter, and varying in

height from 60 to about 110 feet, are frequently found in connection

with the earlier monastic establishments of Ireland. The question of

their origin and uses long occupied much antiquarian attention. In

the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries they had been regarded by

archæologists as the work of the Danes; but towards the close of the

latter century General Vallancey propounded various theories, which

assumed them to be of Phœnician or Indo-Scythian origin, and to have

contained the sacred fire from whence all the fires in the kingdom

were annually rekindled. By those who affirmed their Christian origin

they were successively declared to be anchorite towers in imitation of

that of St. Simon Stylites, and penitential prisons, and thus theories

were multiplied until they became almost as numerous as the towers

themselves. Each succeeding writer, instead of elucidating, appeared to

involve the subject in deeper mystery than ever--a mystery that was

proverbial until dispelled by George Petrie in his great work on _The

Origin and Uses of the Round Towers of Ireland_, which was received,

with good cause for the effusion, as ‘the most learned, the most exact,

and the most important ever published upon the antiquities of the

ancient Irish nation.’

That the general conclusions embodied in this work were arrived at

after a long and patient investigation, not only of the architectural

peculiarities of the numerous round towers, but also of the

ecclesiastical structures usually found in connection with them, is

sufficiently shown by the many references to, and illustrations of,

examples scattered over the whole country. But Petrie also, with the

assistance of the best Celtic scholars in Ireland, sought in the

‘Annals’ and other Irish MSS. for references to such buildings as

it was the custom of the early inhabitants to erect; and from these

hitherto-neglected sources of information, much light was thrown upon

the subject of ancient Irish ecclesiastical architecture. The following

is a summary of Petrie’s conclusions:--

1. That the Irish ecclesiastics had, from a very early period, in

connection with their cathedral and abbey churches, campaniles or

detached belfries, called in the Irish ‘Annals’ and other ancient

authorities by the term _Cloictheach_, ‘House of a bell.’

2. That no other building, either round or square, suited to the

purpose of a belfry, has ever been found in connection with any church

of an age anterior to the twelfth century, with the single exception of

the square belfry attached to a church on Inis Clothrann or Clorin, an

island in Lough Ree, which seems to be of earlier date.

3. That they were designed to answer at least a twofold purpose--to

serve as belfries, and as keeps or places of strength, in which the

sacred utensils, books, relics, and other valuables were deposited, and

into which the ecclesiastics to whom they belonged could retire for

security in cases of sudden attack.

4. An examination of ancient Irish literature tends strongly to the

conclusion that the people so generally recognised this use of the

round towers as a primary one, that they very rarely applied to a tower

erected for defence any other term but that of ‘cloictheach’ or belfry.

5. That they were probably also used, when occasion required, as

beacons and watch-towers.

Petrie, while establishing their ecclesiastical character and origin,

gave, however, too wide a margin to the date of their erection, viz.,

from the sixth century to the thirteenth. The investigations of the

late Lord Dunraven in tracing such structures on the Continent narrowed

their first erection down to the ninth century. He shows that they were

founded on European examples, the most notable being those of Ravenna,

where six of its round towers still stand. The round towers were due

to Byzantine influences, and some writers trace their original source

to the towers built in connection with early Syrian churches. Miss

Stokes, following Lord Dunraven, assigns the Irish round towers to

three periods between 890 and 1238 A.D., and classifies them into four

distinct groups, according to their style of masonry and doorways.

[Illustration: Doorway, Round Tower, Glendalough.]

The Norse sea-rovers rendered ecclesiastical establishments most

unsafe. The first period of their invasions extended from the end of

the eighth century to the middle of the ninth century, and the land

was ravaged from north to south with fire and sword. On the sea-coast

and along the river valleys the country lay waste. On the banks of the

Bann, the shores of Lough Neagh, by the Boyne, and broad expansions

of the Shannon, and as far south as the distant Skellig Rock, few

sacred establishments escaped plunder and desecration. To protect their

churches, oratories, and sacred treasures, these towers were built by

the monks, from which watch could be kept, and an easy retreat made to

them as places of safety; their lines can still be traced along the

shores of the waters where the fleets of the Danes are known to have

appeared.

The usual features of the round towers may be thus summarised:

* * * * *

[Illustration: Cross over the Doorway of Antrim Tower.]

[Illustration: Doorway, Donaghmore Tower, Co. Meath.]

_Doorways._--In form these are similar to the doorways we have

described as characteristic of the early churches, but they are

generally more highly ornamented, and appear to have been furnished

with double doors. They are placed almost invariably at a considerable

elevation above the ground. A flat projecting band, with a small

bead-moulding at the angles, is the most usual decoration; but in some

instances a human head, sculptured in bold relief, is found upon each

side of the arch. A stone immediately above the doorway of Antrim tower

exhibits a cross sculptured in _alto-relievo_; and at Donaghmore, in

Co. Meath, a figure of the Crucifixion, in bold relief, occupies a

similar position. This style of decoration may have been much more

common than is generally supposed, as, of the number of towers

remaining in Ireland, the doorways of at least one-third have been

destroyed. Concentric arches, with chevron and other mouldings, occur

at Timahoe and at Kildare.

* * * * *

[Illustration: Window, Round Tower, Cashel.]

_Windows and Apertures._--Generally speaking, these are similar in form

to the windows in contemporary churches--with this difference, that

they never splay, and that the arch-head in numerous examples differs

in interior form from that of the exterior. The windows in the earliest

towers are square-headed or triangular, and in the latest they are well

formed, and of cut stone. The tower was divided into storeys, about

12 feet in height, the floors of which were supported by projections

of the masonry or by brackets. Each storey, except the highest, was

generally lighted by one small window; the highest has generally four

of large size. A conical roof of stone completed the building. The

tower usually rested on a low circular plinth; the walls varied in

thickness, from 3 to 5 feet; the lowest storey had no aperture, and

sometimes its space was filled by solid masonry. The earliest towers

were built of rubble masonry; and the spaces between the stones were

filled with spawls; little mortar was used in laying the courses, but

grouting abundantly. In the latest towers fine ashlar masonry was

used, like the Norman work of the twelfth century; a few have external

string courses, as in the perfect tower at Ardmore, County Waterford.

About seventy round towers still remain, thirteen of which are perfect,

of which ten retain the original conical cap.

* * * * *

[Illustration: Clondalkin Round Tower.]

_Clondalkin._--In the village of Clondalkin, at a distance of about

six miles from Dublin by road, stands one of the best preserved of

the round towers. Its height to the top of the cone is 90 feet. The

doorway, which is approached by a flight of stone steps, comparatively

modern, is square-headed, with inclined sides, and perfectly plain, as

are also the windows and top apertures. Some years ago a gentleman of

the neighbourhood caused this tower to be repaired, upon which occasion

floors were added, and placed in their original position. Access may

be had from storey to storey by the aid of fixed ladders, so that a

visitor has here an opportunity for observation not frequently to be

met with. It should be remarked that the projection at the base, about

13 feet high, and which is nearly all solid masonry, is not found in

any other round tower in Ireland, and it may possibly be an afterwork.

The tower of Clondalkin, though nearly perfect, cannot be considered

a very fine example of its class. It is built of rubble masonry, is

somewhat low, and its roof, which does not appear to be original, is

wanting in that degree of lightness and elegance observable in many.

The other towers in the immediate neighbourhood of Dublin are at

Swords, Lusk, and Rathmichael. That of Swords has been disfigured

by the restoration of the top, and the ivy which threatened its

destruction has been removed. That of Lusk has been incorporated into

the west end of the parish church, and the tower at Rathmichael is a

mere stump.

[Illustration: Doorway of Clondalkin Tower.]

* * * * *

_Monasterboice._--There is a fine example at Monasterboice, within

about six miles of Drogheda. The churches, the tower, and the

magnificent crosses of this ancient foundation form a group of

ecclesiastical antiquities in some respects unsurpassed in Ireland.

A description of the crosses will be found in the previous chapter.

The tower, the erection of which there is every reason to refer to an

early period, is one of particular interest, exhibiting, as it does,

a decorated doorway, the head of which is cut out of two stones laid

horizontally one above the other. A band extends round the head and

down the sides of the doorway, but terminates on a level with the

sill, or rather turns off at a right angle, passing horizontally for

a distance of eight inches, from which point it ascends, and running

upwards round the doorway head, gives the appearance of a double band.

A space between the bands, upon each side of the upper part of the

doorway, and one upon the semicircular arched head, left uncut, appear

suggestive of the cross. The window immediately over the doorway may

be looked upon as a characteristic example of the opening found in a

similar position in most of the towers, and which is supposed to have

answered the purpose of a second doorway, or to have been designed

for the purpose of affording persons within the tower some means

of defending the entrance beneath. In this example, however, it is

unusually small. The other windows are square-headed, as were also the

large apertures of the uppermost storey.[127] The masonry is good, and

characteristic of an early period; the stones are large, well fitted

together, and pass through a considerable thickness of the wall, as

was observed in the injured upper portion of the structure. The tower

has been well repaired by the Board of Works, and flights of steps

laid from floor to floor, by which the summit of the top storey can be

reached.

A church of very primitive construction, and probably several centuries

older than the tower, stands in the cemetery, at a little distance

to the north-east of the other remains. Its only doorway is placed,

as usual, in the centre of the west gable. It is square-headed, and

possesses every indication of great antiquity; but the accumulation of

the churchyard soil has buried the lower portion at least to a depth of

several feet. The church consisted of a nave and chancel; the latter

has been destroyed, but a plain semicircular chancel arch remains. The

church immediately adjoining the round tower is obviously an erection

of the early part of the thirteenth century.

* * * * *

[Illustration: Doorway of Kildare Tower.]

_Kildare._--The round tower of Kildare is in several respects one of

the most remarkable in Ireland. Its doorway, of which an illustration

is annexed, is unusually rich, of Irish-Romanesque work, consisting

of three concentric arches, upon two of which a variety of mouldings

appears. The external arch is quite plain, and evidently not as ancient

as the others. An ornamental canopy, a portion of which still remains,

once surmounted the doorway. A still more remarkable and finer doorway

is that of Timahoe. The tower of Kildare is 105½ feet high, and 55 feet

in circumference; it bears evidence of having been repaired at various

periods. Like the round tower of Cloyne, in the County of Cork, and

like those of Kilkenny and Kilmallock, it is finished with a plain

battlemented parapet, comparatively modern, and added, probably, at

some period when the original roof of stone had been destroyed, perhaps

by lightning.

[Illustration: Round Tower, Devenish.]

* * * * *

_Devenish._--This tower, with other remains of antiquity, some of which

are associated with the name of St. Molaise (see p. 288), stands on

the Island of Devenish in Lower Lough Erne, a couple of miles from

Enniskillen. The tower is 84 feet 10 inches high, and is remarkable for

its symmetry, and the perfection and regularity of its masonry to the

very apex. It has a round-headed doorway 9 feet from the ground; at

this part it is 8 feet in diameter, and the walls are 4 feet thick. It

has five storeys. Above the doorway is a triangular-headed window, and

the top storey has four windows nearly facing the cardinal points. It

has the unique distinction of possessing the only external decoration

not connected with apertures. This is a cornice or band of Romanesque

work, of good design, immediately beneath the conical cap. On the

band, and over the apertures, are quaintly-executed heads, the beards

consisting of interlaced patterns. The tower was thoroughly restored in

1835.

Wakeman's handbook of Irish antiquities · 第 13 / 17 章