To which His Honour Judge Young replied:—

“GENTLEMEN,—Be pleased to accept my best thanks for the address

you have so unexpectedly presented, and be assured that I do

most highly value it on account of the expressions it contains

of your entire satisfaction with the manner in which I have

presided over the Insolvent Debtor’s Court for the last eight

years. Where I have always been treated with marked

consideration by yourselves, gentlemen, I could not do otherwise

than reciprocate the courtesies to which you kindly refer.

(Signed),

“CHARLES YOUNG.”

While Judge Young was practising at the bar, he had a large and

lucrative business, and was generally engaged on one side or the other

in most of the leading cases then before the courts. He was invariably

retained on behalf of those he was pleased to style the “Bleeding

tenantry of Prince Edward Island” against the landlords, and generally

succeeded in gaining a verdict in favour of his clients. He was always

the friend and advocate of the oppressed. It is pleasing to note here

that Judge Young has held no position which he has not adorned. In

office and out of office he has rendered great service to the community.

In 1838, a Mechanics’ Institute was established in Charlottetown, mainly

through his efforts, and he had the honour of delivering the

introductory lecture, which was afterwards published in the _Gazette_.

He has since 1845 taken a very deep interest in the cause of temperance,

and was Grand Worthy Patriarch of the Sons of Temperance of Prince

Edward Island several terms, and is a member of the National Division of

the Sons of Temperance of North America. He is also an active member of

the Methodist church, a local preacher, and a Bible-class teacher, and

fills several other important offices in that church. He was

instrumental in founding the second Methodist church in Charlottetown,

and is president of Prince Edward Island Auxiliary Bible Society. The

Judge is a thorough working Christian. The degree of LL.D. was conferred

upon him by the Newton (United States) University; and in 1858 he was

offered the honour of knighthood by Her Majesty, but respectfully

declined the royal gift. In Masonry he takes an interest, and belongs to

the Royal Arch Chapter. In 1838 Judge Young married Lucretia, daughter

of John Starr, of Halifax, Nova Scotia, and he and his wife, there being

no children, enjoy life in their beautiful home, “Fairholm,”

Charlottetown.

* * * * *

=Ussher, The Right Rev. Brandram Boileau,= M.D., Montreal, Bishop of the

Reformed Episcopal church in the Dominion of Canada and the Island of

Newfoundland, was born in the city of Dublin, Ireland, on the 6th day of

August, 1845. He is the youngest son of Captain Richard Beverly Ussher,

late of H. M. 86th Regt., and Henrietta Ussher (_née_ Boileau). On both

sides of the house his ancestors were most distinguished. Captain R. B.

Ussher was descended from Richard Neville, the great Earl of Warwick,

one of whose descendants (for political reasons took the name of the

office which he bore, viz., Usher of the Black Rod, thus retaining his

influential and lucrative position when the name of Neville had become

unpopular and the “Kingmaker’s” influence had waned,) subsequently

settled in Ireland. To distinguish the family name from the office, the

second letter, s, was added some eighty years ago. The subject of this

sketch is descended from a long line of churchmen. His great-grandfather

was rector of the parish of Clontarf, near Dublin, which was held in the

family from father to son for over one hundred and fifty years. The Rev.

John Ussher, afterwards Astronomer Royal for Ireland, was the last of

the family to hold the incumbency. His sons were Rear-Admiral Sir Thomas

Ussher, K.C.A., who figured in the history of the great Napoleon, taking

him to Elba in H.M.S. _Undaunted_. He died Naval Commander-in-Chief, at

Cork, Ireland, and lies buried in one of the vaults of Monkstown church,

County Dublin—his record was that of a gallant sailor. John Ussher, of

Woodpark, who left four sons, the youngest of whom, Richard Beverly, was

the father of Bishop Ussher, of Montreal. He is directly descended from

Archbishop Henry Ussher, one of the founders of Trinity College, Dublin,

whose brother Arland was the father of James Ussher (Trinity’s first

student, buried in Henry VII. Chapel in Westminster Abbey), the

celebrated Primate of Ireland, author of “Ussher’s Chronology,” etc.,

with whom the Duke of Wellington was also connected, owing to the fact

that Mary Ussher married Henry Colley, of Castle Carberry, who was the

mother of the first Lord Mornington, who was the grandfather of the Duke

of Wellington. The Venerable Archdeacon Adam Ussher, rector of Clontarf,

was the brother of the above named Mary Ussher and son of Sir William

Ussher, clerk of the Council. The Rectory of Clontarf descended to his

son Frederick, and from him to his son Henry Ussher, D.D., who held the

Andrew’s Professorship of Astronomy in Trinity College, Dublin, and from

him is directly descended Captain R. B. Ussher, the father of the Right

Rev. Bishop Ussher. Three hundred years ago two brothers of the name of

Ussher were driven from Ireland during one of the troubles, and settled

in the neighbourhood of Melrose, in Scotland, where they acquired

considerable lands, and amongst them the property of Huntley-burn, one

of the most celebrated spots on the Borders. The grandfather of the

present Thomas Ussher, of Edinburgh, for seventeen years secretary of

the Borders’ County Association for the Advancement of Education (and

out of which arose the celebration of the centenary of Sir Walter

Scott), sold to Sir Walter Scott the chief part of the estate of

Abbotsford (_vide_ “Lockhart’s Life of Scott”). By unbroken tradition

this branch claims kinship with Archbishop Ussher; and the Rev. W.

Neville Ussher, cousin of the above named Thomas Ussher, is a canon of

the Cathedral in Edinburgh. The Ussher family have had the honour of

having four distinguished church dignitaries; two Archbishops of Armagh;

one Bishop of Kildare (Robert Ussher); and Bishop B. B. Ussher, of

Montreal, who has at present five surviving brothers and two sisters as

follow:—Major-General John Theophilus Ussher, Beverly Ussher, Henry

Ussher, M.B., Rev. P. R. C. Ussher, a prominent minister in Australia;

and James Ussher, solicitor; Henrietta Buchanan and Arabella Madelina

Buchanan. On his mother’s side Bishop Ussher has an equally

distinguished ancestry, the Boileau family being one of the few that can

trace their genealogy back without a break for a period of over six

hundred years. The present Baron Boileau de Castleneau is the

seventeenth in descent from Etienne Boileau, who, born early in the

thirteenth century, was appointed by Louis IX., in the year 1255, Grand

Provost of Paris, at that period the highest officer of state. In 1371,

Jean Boileau was ennobled by Charles V. At the revocation of the Edict

of Nantes, A.D. 1685, Jacques Boileau, the 10th baron, was arrested as a

Protestant, tortured, and, after an imprisonment of ten and one-half

years, died in the prison of St. Jean de Vedas, one mile from

Montpellier, a noble martyr for the Protestant faith, having been

beheaded by order of the Duke de Nemours. His son, Charles Boileau, then

a youth, having taken refuge in England and having entered the British

Army, firm to his Protestant faith, formally renounced his rights and

titles to the honours and estates of the family which thereby devolved

on his younger brother Maurice, who became the eleventh Baron Boileau.

From that time the barony fell into the hands of the junior and Roman

Catholic branch of the family of which the present Baron Boileau de

Castleneau is now the representative. He holds, too, the ancient château

de Castleneau, six miles from Nimes, which has been for three and a half

centuries in the family to which it gives the present title of the

barony. Five of the Barons de Castleneau held in succession the office

of Royal Treasurer. Charles Boileau died in 1733, leaving three children

who had issue, whose grandchildren and more remote issue are now living

to the number of six hundred and fifty. The Right Rev. Bishop Ussher,

when a child, was sent from under the jurisdiction of a governess at a

very early age. At Delgany College, in the county Wicklow, the Rev. Dr.

Daniel Flyns, of Harcourt street, Dublin, and the Rugby of Ireland, the

Rev. Dr. Stackpools, of Kingstown, he received his education as a youth.

As a lad he was older than his years and sought the company of those

much his seniors, showing a decided _penchant_ for those given to study.

Thrown chiefly amongst medical students he followed the course of study

so closely with one companion, that he was almost as well fitted as he

to pass the examinations. At a little over sixteen years he secured the

diploma of the Royal Dublin Society, taking sixth place out of

seventy-three candidates. Owing to heavy financial losses, through the

dishonesty of associates, the father of young Ussher was unable to

permit him to continue his studies and the determination was formed to

visit the United States. The resolve was put into execution, and, in the

city of New York, mercantile life was entered upon; successful, though

not in harmony with it, it was abandoned after a year, and a visit

undertaken to Washington, where several of the United States’ army

hospitals were visited; the old medical love rekindled and much

practical knowledge gained in the treatment of surgical diseases and

gun-shot wounds. The resolve was then formed to adopt medicine as a

profession, and after pursuing his medical studies in the University of

Michigan, he finally received the degree of Doctor of Medicine in

Illinois, became a member of the State Medical Association, and was

ultimately elected a member of the National Eclectic Medical

Association. As a practitioner he was most successful, and as a citizen

highly esteemed in the city of Aurora, Illinois, where he practised for

over ten years. He was vigorously identified with the welfare of the

community, and at one time it seemed that he would enter into political

life, being offered the nomination by the Democratic party as a

candidate for the legislature. Politics, however, were too impure to

have any permanent attraction for him, and he devoted himself to his

professional duties and the interests of the Anglican Church, of which

he was a member. Set thinking by a sermon preached by the well-known

evangelist, Mr. Moody, the instructions of pious parents were revived,

and earnest Christian work entered upon with marked evidence of the

divine favour. Under the license of the Right Rev. Dr. Whitehouse, then

bishop of Illinois, he kept alive several mission fields and taught a

large Bible-class with great acceptability. It was then pressed upon him

that he should enter the ministry of the Anglican Church in the Diocese

of Illinois. Steadily the conviction of the need of entire consecration

to God’s service deepened; it was fought back, but the urging of Bishop

Whitehouse was strong, and as there was then little evidence of the

sacerdotalism that subsequently manifested itself, the course of study

was entered upon under the bishop’s direction. In time it became

apparent that the bishop of Illinois held strong High Church views. He

was a guest in Dr. Ussher’s house on the evening of the day of the

publication of Bishop Tozer’s letter condemning Bishop Cummins of

Kentucky, for partaking of and administering the communion of the Lord’s

Supper with Dr. John Hall, Drs. Arnot and Dorner, of the Presbyterian

church, and reading it with a sense of indignation, he (Dr. Ussher)

asked Bishop Whitehouse what he thought of such a letter, to which

Bishop Whitehouse replied in cold, severe tones, “I think Bishop Tozer

is perfectly right, and Bishop Cummins deserves the severest

condemnation.” Those words decided the mind of Dr. Ussher, and realizing

that as an Evangelical Protestant Churchman, he would be out of sympathy

with Bishop Whitehouse, he determined to abandon the idea of entering

the Anglican ministry. He felt, however, that his heart was so bound up

in the Episcopal Church, and his love for her liturgy was so great, that

he could not be at home in any other branch of Christ’s Church. At this

juncture the Right Rev. Bishop Cummins, D.D., took steps to organize the

Reformed Episcopal Church, which being made public, proved the open

door. Under the guidance of that distinguished Protestant prelate, he

pursued his studies and was ordained deacon in the city of Chicago, by

the Right Rev. Bishop Cheney, in Christ Church, June 9th, 1874, and

presbyter, July 16th, 1876, in Emmanuel Church, Ottawa, Ontario, by

Bishops Cheney, Nicholson, Cridge and Fallows. His pastorates in Canada

have been, one of three years in Toronto, during which was built the

church on the corner of Simcoe and Caer Howell streets, and his present

charge in St. Bartholomew’s, Montreal, over which he has been pastor

since 1878. For good and sufficient reasons he and his congregation

withdrew from the jurisdiction of the Reformed Episcopal Church in the

United States and united with the English branch of the Reformed

Episcopal Church under the Right Rev. T. H. Gregg, M.D., D.D., otherwise

called the Reformed Church of England. By the General Synod in England,

in the following year, the Rev. Dr. Ussher was elected to the

episcopate, but declined. Two years after he was elected again, the

Canadian Synod electing him as their bishop, and in 1882, on the 19th

day of June, he was consecrated in Trinity Church, Southend, by the

Right Rev. Bishop Gregg, and seven presbyters, as “a bishop in the

Church of God.” Returning to Canada he took charge of the Diocese of

Canada and Newfoundland. The bishop believing in benevolent societies as

handmaids to the church, has been a member of the Order of Oddfellows

since 1865, and has held the office of Grand Master of the Province of

Quebec; he has also been, and is at present, a member of the Order of

Knights of Pythias, in which he holds the rank of Past Grand Chancellor,

and has had the honour of being Supreme Representative for the State of

Illinois, and the authorship of one of the degrees in use by the order.

Bishop Ussher is a graceful and forcible writer and an eloquent speaker,

and poet of acknowledged merit. In his religious views he is an old-time

Evangelical believer, pronounced in his Protestant views, in fact, a

_keeper in the old paths_, for which reason he is ecclesiastically where

he is to-day. On the 16th day of July, 1867, he was married by the Rev.

Dr. Kelly, in the city of Chicago, to Elizabeth Leonora Thompson, third

daughter of the Rev. Skeffington Thompson, of Broomfield, near Lucan, in

the county of Dublin, Ireland, and Elizabeth Margaret D’Arcy. The father

of Mrs. Ussher, the Rev. Skeffington Thompson, is the thirteenth child

of the late Skeffington Thompson, of Rathnally, county of Meath, by Anna

Maria Carter, only child and heiress of Thomas Carter, of Rathnally,

county Meath. Skeffington Thompson the elder was an unsuccessful

candidate in the last Irish Parliament against the Duke of Wellington

for the borough of Trim, both candidates being neighbours in the same

county, Dangan Castle, the Wellesley seat, being near Trim. The family

of Thompson, according to Burke, descended from the Thompsons of Barton,

Cumberland, a branch of which settled about the 16th century in the

county of Hertford, England. The Irish branch are descended from those

who crossed over to Ulster when that province was first taken in hand by

King James, and engaging in the prosperous linen trade made large

fortunes. Mrs. Ussher’s family history on the male side is interesting,

as leading back to the famous Thomas Carter, who took so active a part

in the Irish revolution, ending with the battle of the Boyne, 1690. This

Thomas Carter was sergeant-at-arms, a partisan of King William III. at

the siege of Derry, and battle of the Boyne. He was, as Burke, Ulster

King of Arms, says “_a gentleman whose services to his country at the

revolution were very considerable, for he not only served King William

at the battle of the Boyne (July 1st, 1690), but secured divers useful

books and writings belonging to King James and his secretaries_.” These

documents he secreted in the vaults of Christ’s Church Cathedral,

Dublin, until after the disturbances. He married for his second wife,

the Countess of Roscommon, widow of Wentworth Dillon, the poet, who was

publicly buried in Westminster Abbey. By her he had no family, but his

only son Thomas became Master of the Irish Rolls, for twenty-four years,

Privy Councillor, and Secretary of State. This Right Hon. Thomas Carter

had two sons and three daughters, from the eldest of whom Mrs. Ussher is

descended. The eldest sister of this Thomas Carter married Doctor Philip

Twysden, bishop of Raphoe, and son of Sir William Twysden, baronet, of

Roydon Hall, Kent. The issue of this marriage, Frances, married George

Bussey, fourth Earl of Jersey and first cousin to Anna Maria Carter,

Mrs. Ussher’s grandmother. This latter alliance resulted in the birth of

two sons and six daughters, her eldest son being George, fifth Earl of

Jersey, and the daughters became Ladies William Russell, Ann Lambton,

Sarah Bailey, Lady Ponsonby, Lady Henrietta, who married the bishop of

Oxford, and Lady Anglesey, wife of the Marquis of Anglesey, a hero of

Waterloo, and for her second husband the Duke of Argyll, which Duchess

of Argyll was cousin german to Mrs. Skeffington Thompson, Mrs. Ussher’s

paternal grandmother. The Right Hon. Thomas Carter’s second daughter,

Susan, married Thomas Carter, of Duleek Park and Castle, county Louth,

and her grand-daughter, Elizabeth, became Marchioness of Thomond by

entering the family of William O’Bryen, descendant from Brien Boroimhe,

King of Ireland, and whose line was continued by the King of Munster and

of Thomond to the reign of Henry VIII., King of England (see Sharpe’s

Peerage). Mrs. Ussher’s family history on the female side is even more

interesting. Her mother was Elizabeth Margaret, eldest daughter of the

Rev. Joshua D’Arcy, Rector of Lacka, county Kildare. This D’Arcy family

came to Ireland early in the 14th century and settled at Platten in the

county Meath. In a book “Maynooth Castle,” written by the present Duke

of Leinster when Marquis of Kildare, on page 5, we read, “Sir John

D’Arcy, Lord Justice of Ireland, married the Countess Johanna de Burgh,

daughter to the Red Earl of Ulster, and sister to Ellen, wife of Robert

Bruce, King of Scotland. They had a son, William, born at Maynooth, in

1330, from whom the present family of D’Arcy are lineally descended, and

are represented by George James Norman D’Arcy, of Hyde Park, county

Westmeath (see Burke’s “Landed Gentry”, also Walford’s “County

Families”), the worthy head of both English and Irish families and

representative of twenty-eight peerages of Great Britain.” The Irish

D’Arcys were governors of Ireland in the reign of the three Edwards,

with extraordinary privileges, the power to appoint a deputy, which as

Fynes Thompson remarks, neither before nor after was granted to any but

some few of the royal blood (and which he exercised on two several

occasions). A descendant, Sir William D’Arcy of Platten (or Platyn) was

the person who carried Lambert Simnel on his shoulders through Dublin

after he had been crowned in Christ Church Cathedral, for which he was

obliged to do homage to his viceroy, in 1488. This Sir William D’Arcy’s

descendant, Vice-Treasurer of Ireland, in 1523, was the author of a work

entitled, “The Decay of Ireland and the causes of it,” the MS. of which

is now in the library of Trinity College, Dublin. It is quite beyond the

limit of this sketch to give a full history of a family dating back to

their ancient seat in Arcques, in Normandy, whence they came to England

with the Conqueror, into whose family they had married previously—then

settled in Lincolnshire and are given _in extenso_ in Burke’s “Extinct

Peerages.” The Yorkshire histories contain a full pedigree of about

twenty-five generations, and the English and Irish pedigree illuminated

by Camden, the historian, and author of the “Brittania,” dating from

1066 to 1617, is in the possession of the present head of the D’Arcy

house, Mrs. Ussher’s cousin. This history says, that Nicholas D’Arcy, of

Platyn, espoused the cause of King James II., and was a captain in his

army. He was consequently attained in 1690, and his estates were

forfeited and sold in 1691; his only son Christopher, dying unmarried,

George D’Arcy, the surviving lineal heir, male, succeeded to the family

headship. This George D’Arcy entertained James the Second in his Castle

of Dunmow the night after the battle of the Boyne, and King William was

his guest previous to the battle. King James in his hurried departure

next morning forgot his pistol which yet remains in the D’Arcy family.

It is related of him that on the occasion he repeated the following

couplet:

“Who will be king I do not know,

But I’ll be D’Arcy of Dunmow.”

He was declared an innocent Papist in 1693, and died in full possession

of his estates in Meath and Westmeath, in 1718. His descendant John

D’Arcy, born 1700, married, 1727, and was the first of the family to

conform to the Protestant faith, which took place before his marriage

with Miss Judge, of Grangebey, county Westmeath. He died in 1785,

leaving four sons, Judge, Francis, Arthur, and James. Francis D’Arcy, on

the death of his brother, Judge D’Arcy, became heir male of Sir William

D’Arcy, of Platyn, second son of Lord D’Arcy, viceroy of Ireland. On the

death of Robert D’Arcy, fourth Earl of Holderness, in Yorkshire, 1778,

heir male of John D’Arcy and Norman D’Arcy. Francis D’Arcy died in 1813,

without issue, and his youngest brother James D’Arcy, who alone had sons

and daughters, thus continued the line—his eldest son, John, claimed

the older D’Arcy baronies, held by the last Earl of Holderness, and this

claim after trial was established. But it appears that as Robert D’Arcy,

fourth Earl of Holderness, left an only child, Lady Amelia, who married

the Marquis of Carmarthan, afterwards fifth Duke of Leeds, thus carrying

off the Yorkshire estates into the Osborn family, the title has not been

resumed by the present family. James D’Arcy, born in 1740, had three

sons, John, born 1767, Joshua, the grandfather of Mrs. Ussher, and

Thomas, who was a major in the army, and at his death, Inspector General

of Police, in Ulster. It is interesting to know that the marriage of

Lady Amelia D’Arcy, Baroness Conyers in her own right, was dissolved by

Act of Parliament in May, 1779, after the birth of three children, and

both parties remarried the following year, the Lady Amelia marrying John

Byron, father of the poet, Lord Byron (she died January 20th, 1784,

Dodd’s Peerage, Genealogical Volume and Plates of Arms, page 5). The

foregoing is a very condensed account, necessarily, of Mrs. Ussher’s

family history. A more extended history involving, as it would, the

introduction of many other distinguished families in every department of

the state, and covering many professions, literary, scientific, military

and naval, we must ask our readers to spare us. Reference to the usual

standard histories, genealogies and heralds of Great Britain, would

confirm the above. It must be remembered that all the history of the

English D’Arcys, dating from 1066, their possession of thirty-three

baronies in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire, their active part with the other

barons in extracting Magna Charta from King John, their subsequent

prominent part in the state during every reign down to that of George

III., the _Pilgrimage of Grace_, these and many other matters have been

omitted, but what has been said will suffice to show whence we have

come, and we trust that the present and future will verify the wise

man’s saying (Prov. xvii, 6.) in the history of Mrs. Ussher, that if

“Children’s children are the crown of old men, the glory of children are

their father’s.” The following are the surviving children of Bishop and

Mrs. Ussher:—Sydney Lahmire Neville Ussher, Clarence Douglas Ussher,

Charles Edward Cheney Ussher, George Richard Beardmore Ussher, Elizabeth

Henrietta Ussher, Warwick Wellesley Ussher.

* * * * *

=Bayard, William=, M.D., Edin., St. John, New Brunswick, was born in

Kentville, Nova Scotia, on the 21st day of August, 1814. The ancestors

of our subject were Huguenots, and directly connected with the family,

represented by the famous knight, “sans peur et sans reproche,” whose

coat of arms is carried by them to this day. Having been driven from

France, they landed in New Amsterdam, now New York, in the month of May,

1647. There were three brothers, Petrus, Balthazer and Nicholas; one

remained in New York, and became one of the most prominent men in that

city; one went to Baltimore and his branch gave senators to that city

for the last hundred years, among them the present United States

Secretary; and the other one went to England, giving numerous soldiers

of distinction to that country, among them Colonel Samuel Vetch Bayard

and Colonel John Bayard, brothers. Colonel Samuel Vetch Bayard had three

sons; one a captain in the army, was killed at the battle of Waterloo;

one a captain in the English navy, was murdered at Fordham, near New

York city; and the third son, Robert, the father of our subject, was a

lieutenant in the British army at the age of thirteen years, and was

allowed to proceed with his studies at Windsor, Nova Scotia, while his

father’s regiment was stationed at Halifax, N.S. He left the army and

graduated in medicine at the University of Edinburgh in 1809, was a D.

C. L. of Windsor College, N.S., and for three years professor of

Obstetrics in the University of New York. When the war of 1812 was

declared against Great Britain, he was required to take the oath of

allegiance or leave the country. He chose the latter course, found his

way to Portland, Maine, left that city in an open boat, and arrived in

the city of St. John, N.B., in the month of May, 1813. From that city he

went to Halifax, N.S., and there married Frances Catherine Robertson,

daughter of Commissary Robertson, who was killed in the Colonial war

which commenced in 1775. Her grandfather was Colonel John Billop, who

owned a large part of Staten Island, near New York, and being a

Loyalist, his property was confiscated. He died in the city of St. John.

Dr. Robert Bayard practised his profession in Kentville, N.S., for

several years, and in 1824 removed to St. John, N.B., where he died in

June, 1868 at the advanced age of eighty-one years. He stood at the head

of his profession, and was a fluent speaker and an able writer. His son,

Dr. W. Bayard, when twelve years of age, was sent to a popular

educational institution, conducted by the Rev. William Powell, at

Fordham, near New York city, where he remained five years. He then

entered as a private student with Dr. Valentine Mott, the eminent

surgeon of New York, at the same time attending the medical lectures at

the College. While in Dr. Mott’s office he took high honours for

proficiency in anatomy. The next year he matriculated at the University

of Edinburgh, from which institution he received the degree of doctor in

medicine in 1837. He then walked the hospitals in Paris, and visited

many in Germany, and on returning to St. John, practised in company with

his father. He has since that time frequently visited the hospitals in

England, France and Germany. “His reputation for skill has,” says a

writer who has noted this gentleman’s career “almost from the start,

stood high, and of his profession he has made a brilliant success. He

has been greatly honoured, alike by the medical fraternity and his

fellow citizens generally, and it is safe to say, that no man in his

profession, in the Province, is held in higher esteem. There is not a

city or large town in the Province of New Brunswick, Nova Scotia or

Prince Edward Island, to which he has not been called upon professional

business.” It may be said that the general public hospital in the city

of St. John owes its existence to the energy and perseverance of Dr.

Bayard. Prior to 1858 he brought the subject prominently before the

authorities, but no action was taken. He then endeavoured to obtain

money to build one by subscription, but finding that many of the most

wealthy men in the city refused to subscribe, he abandoned the idea, and

employed and paid a lawyer to draft an Act to assess the community for

the purpose. This bill he placed before the Legislature of the Province,

and with the assistance of Sir Leonard Tilley, Judge the Hon. John H.

Gray and other members of the House, got the bill passed granting power

to raise the funds required for the building, and the support of it. He

has been President of the Board of Commissioners since its establishment

in 1860. He is chairman of the Board of Health for the city and county

of St. John, having been appointed by the Government in 1855 to carry

out the Sanitary Act passed in that year. He was elected President of

the New Brunswick Medical Society for four years in succession,

resigning the situation in 1881. He was elected President of the Council

of Physicians and Surgeons of New Brunswick in 1881, and resigned the

situation in 1885, not feeling justified in assuming the responsibility

of carrying out the Act, the Legislature having declined to pass

amendments to it required. He was appointed Coroner for the city and

county of St. John in 1839, resigning the situation in 1867. During his

tenure of office, there was but one coroner, now there are six with very

small increase of population. The above situations were unsolicited. Dr.

Bayard was at one time the New Brunswick editor of the _Montreal Medical

and Surgical Journal_, in which many interesting articles from his pen

may be found. The arduous duties of his profession compelled him to give

up the work. “He is regarded as a high authority on any branch of

medical science which he sees fit to discuss.” His address to the

Medical Society upon the “use and abuse of alcoholic drinks,” and his

lecture at the Mechanics’ Institute in St. John upon the “Progress of

Medicine, Surgery and Hygiene during the last one hundred years,” has

received high commendation. His politics are liberal-conservative. He is

a member of Trinity Episcopal church, and an exemplary man in all the

walks of life. The wife of Dr. Bayard was Susan Maria Wilson, daughter

of John Wilson, Esq., of Chamcook, near St. Andrew’s, in his day a large

ship owner and merchant, and one of the most enterprising men in the

county. It may be said that the St. Andrew’s and Woodstock railway owes

its origin to his energy. It was from him that Dr. Bayard received the

first telegram ever sent to St. John, as follows:—“To Dr. W. Bayard,

April 30th, 1851. Being the first subscriber to the Electric Telegraph

Company, I am honoured by the first communication to your city,

announcing this great and wonderful work God has made known to man, by

giving him control of his lightning. Signed, John Wilson.” Dr. Bayard

was married in the year 1844, and his wife died in the year 1876,

leaving no children. She was a woman of ability and fine social

qualities, always happiest when she had a house full of friends, and was

a splendid entertainer. She had wonderful energy as shown in attending

to the details of domestic life, in looking after the poor and

unfortunate, and in visiting the Home for Aged Women, the Protestant

Orphan Asylum, etc., etc. She was truly an angel of mercy, and her death

was nothing short of a calamity to the city. Dr. Bayard has not again

married.

* * * * *

=Stevens, Rev. Lorenzo Gorham=, A.M., B.D., Portland, St. John, was born

in Bedford, Mass., U.S.A., on 26th December, 1846, and is the eldest son

of Lorenzo Dow Stevens and Mary Gorham Parsons Stevens. His grandparents

on his father’s side were Abel Stevens, whose nephew, Abel Stevens,

D.D., LL.D., is one of the leading divines of the Methodist Episcopal

church in the United States; and Hadassa Mills, whose brother, Luther

Mills, was a distinguished graduate of Harvard University, in the class

of 1792. His father’s cousin, Edward Lewis Stevens, a graduate of

Harvard, of the class of 1863, and afterwards first lieutenant in the

44th Mass. Volunteer Militia, was killed at Boykin’s Mills, near Camden,

S.C., April 18th, 1865. His grandfather on his mother’s side was Wilhelm

Edlund, ship owner and merchant, born in Stockholm, Sweden. The brother

of this gentleman was private secretary to Gustavus III. His grandfather

left no male issue, and the name, so far as can be learned, is now

extinct in America. His grandmother, on his mother’s side, was Abigail

Hodges, daughter of Abigail Davis, who was cousin of Chief Justice

Parsons, of Massachusetts, and whose brother, Aaron Davis, served at the

battle of Bunker Hill, under Gen. Warren, and received a musket ball in

his thigh at the time. His mother’s grandfather, Joseph Davis, after the

early death of his wife Abigail, married Christina Greene, niece of Gen.

Greene, one of the Division Commanders under Gen. Washington. After

leaving the Francis St. grammar school, Boston, Lorenzo Gorham Stevens

entered the (Roxbury) Latin School, professor Buck, principal, where he

remained five years, graduating July, 1865. He then entered Harvard

University, and remained four years, graduating in the class of 1869.

His favourite studies in the college were the languages, history and

mental and moral philosophy. The year following his graduation he was

principal of the English department of the German-American School, in

Morrisania, New York. In September, 1870, he entered the Episcopal

Theological Seminary, Cambridge, Mass., and remained one year. The years

1872 and 1873 he spent in foreign travel, at the same time prosecuting

his theological studies. While in Berlin he attended at the University

the lectures of the celebrated Dr. Dörner. Mr. Stevens travelled as far

east as St. Petersburg, and as far north as Upsala, Sweden. After a most

enjoyable tour in which sight-seeing and study were about equally

combined, he returned to the Cambridge Seminary, and graduated June,

1874. His diaconate he spent in Massachusetts, preaching in several

places. In September, 1875, he became rector of Trinity Church, St.

Stephen, N.B., and in January of the following year, was admitted to the

order of priesthood in the cathedral, Fredericton, by Bishop Medley, now

Metropolitan. He served as rector of Trinity church three years. On

November, 1878, he entered upon the rectorship of St. Luke’s church,

Portland, St. John, a position he still holds. Rev. Mr. Stevens was

chaplain of the Sussex Lodge, F. and A. M. (St. Stephen), and has acted

as chaplain for other lodges at various times. On August, 30, 1881 he

was married to Susan Lynds, only surviving child of Dr. John Waddell,

superintendent for twenty-seven years of the Provincial Lunatic Asylum,

St. John. (A sketch of his life will be found elsewhere in this book.)

Of this marriage two children have been born, Henry Waddell, March 24,

1883, and Edlund Archibald, August 23, 1885.

* * * * *

=Klotz, Otto=, Preston, Ontario, is a native of Germany, having been

born in the city of Kiel, on the shores of the Baltic sea, on the 25th

of November, 1817. His father, Jacob Klotz, was the junior of the firm

of Klotz & Son of that place. After the death of the senior member, the

firm was continued for many years, first by Jacob Klotz, and

subsequently by his younger brother, Christian Klotz, their business

being chiefly the purchase of grain and shipping it to England. Otto

Klotz received his primary education at a public school in his native

place, but was subsequently educated in Luebeck; after having passed his

final examination creditably, he was confirmed in conformity with the

rites of the Lutheran Church at Kiel, and thereupon apprenticed to a

wine merchant in Luebeck, where, in addition to his mother-tongue, he

had ample opportunity of making use of French and English, which

languages he had by this time fairly mastered. At the expiration of his

apprenticeship, he returned home. In the spring of 1837, his uncle,

Christian Klotz, under the old firm of Klotz & Son, sent on speculation

a cargo of wheat to America (the crops having failed in 1836), and young

Otto Klotz was permitted to make a trip to the new world in his uncle’s

brig, laden with wheat. The requisite arrangements for that voyage were

soon made, and since neither himself nor his relations and friends

considered the departure as being of long duration, but rather a

pleasure trip, the farewell at the wharf was neither gloomy nor sombre,

although his father had advised him to inquire for a good situation, and

if found to stay for a few years, and then return with a good store of

general knowledge, as many young men of the town had done before him. On

the 27th of March, 1837, the anchor was weighed, the sails set, and the

_Friedericke_, heavily laden with wheat, sailed out of Kiel harbour with

young Klotz on board. The voyage was completed in seventy-nine long

days, and on the 14th of June, anchor was cast in the East River, at New

York. On arrival it was found that the wheat was heated, and the market

overstocked, hence the speculation was a failure. Otto Klotz found to

his regret that owing to great depression in business and the numerous

failures, he could not procure a situation in New York. He visited

Newark, New Jersey, and there met a German farmer from Canada, who

proposed to him the taking up of wild land and going into farming. The

novelty of this proposal appeared to have some charm and was really

entered upon. Writing to his father informing him of his resolution, he

handed the letter to the captain of his uncle’s brig, bade him farewell,

and left for Canada. Arrived in the township of McKillop, in the Huron

Tract, he endeavoured to learn what was required in order to become a

successful farmer, and soon ascertained that for a young man standing

alone without relations or friends and without any knowledge of farming,

it would be unwise to take up land and “roughing it in the bush;”

however he stayed about two months, during which time he acquired

considerable proficiency in the use of the axe, helping to chop and put

up log houses in the neighbourhood. He left McKillop in October, 1837,

and went to Preston, which place was then all alive with new settlers

from Germany. He engaged for some time as clerk in a store, and thinking

he saw a good opportunity, he started in business on his own account in

February, 1838, using his father’s letter of credit in the purchase of

his first stock of goods. In 1839, he married the daughter of a farmer

of the township of Wilmot. This marriage proved to be a happy one, his

good wife being an excellent helpmate, a good housewife, a dutiful

mother and an exemplary spouse. Shortly after young Klotz had settled in

Preston, he became acquainted with an old English gentleman, William

Scollick, who was a surveyor, conveyancer and a commissioner of the

Court of Request, and who took a particular fancy to him and his

penmanship. He advised him to learn conveyancing, and promised to

instruct him therein. This kind offer was readily accepted; the pupil

employed his spare moments in studying to perfect himself, became an apt

scholar, and after the death of old Mr. Scollick, became his successor

as conveyancer, a business which proved no mean help for improving his

pecuniary circumstances. Mr. Klotz was made a naturalized British

subject in 1844, was appointed a notary public in 1846, a commissioner

for taking affidavits in 1848, a clerk of the Division Court in 1848,

and a justice of the peace in 1853. For a long term of years, he was

director of the County Agricultural Society, and once its president. Of

the Preston Mechanics’ Institute and Horticultural Society he has been

president from the establishment of the same. Of the Executive Committee

of the Association of Mechanics’ Institutes for Ontario, he was a member

for twelve years, during six of which its vice-president and for two

years its president, and by virtue of these offices a member of the

Agricultural Council of Ontario. But the office which he has occupied

longest and in which he has worked with greater energy than in any

other, is that of School Trustee. When in 1841, the Public Schools Act

became law, he was elected one of the School Commissioners in the

township (the title was subsequently changed to School Trustee); at the

expiration of his term he was re-elected, and has been so re-elected

ever since. A good stone school building with a teacher as good as in

those days could be obtained was the result of his early work in the

cause of education. He next succeeded in getting permission from the

District Council to have all property in the Preston school section

taxed for a free school, and that school has been free ever since,

although in former years it was optional with the rate-payers whether

their school should be free or supported by a rate bill per pupil

attending school. After Preston became incorporated, he was appointed

local superintendent of schools, and in that capacity he was seventeen

years a member of the County Board of Examiners of Teachers. The

scarcity of good teachers was often severely felt, while at present they

are plentiful, and Mr. Klotz obtained permission for German teachers to

be examined in German, and he had charge of preparing the questions for

such examinations. At the insistance of several teachers, he prepared

and published a German grammar for use of German pupils and others

studying German. In 1853, he agitated a public examination of all the

schools in the county; in this move he was ably assisted by the late Dr.

Scott, who was then the warden of the county. The county council granted

$100 for the purchase of prizes to be distributed among the successful

competitors, and appointed Mr. Klotz to make the requisite arrangements,

which were successfully carried out. In 1865, Mr. Klotz, assisted by two

of the teachers of the Preston school, prepared an _exposé_ of “The

Irish National Readers,” which at that time were the authorized readers

for the common schools. In that _exposé_ the writer criticised the

spelling, grammatical construction, historical blunders, unsuitable

words and expressions for children, unfitness of the books for Canadian

schools, and the entire absence therein of any article which might tend

to cultivate in the minds of the pupils a patriotic feeling. A lengthy

and animated correspondence between the chief superintendent, the Rev.

Dr. Ryerson, and Mr. Klotz was the result; but notwithstanding the same,

Mr. Klotz had the gratification of seeing “The Irish National Readers”

superseded by a Canadian series of Readers. As president of the

Mechanics’ Institute, Mr. Klotz has been indefatigable in providing for

the inhabitants of Preston and neighbourhood a large library of well

selected books, numbering in 1886 4,000 volumes, of which 2,800 are

English, and 1,200 German. In politics Mr. Klotz commenced as early as

1838, then hardly a year in Canada, to take an active part, having been

required to shoulder a gun and to stand guard at the Grand River bridge,

upon a report that a band of rebels under lead of one Duncan, was coming

from London to invade Waterloo, which, however, afterwards proved a

false report. He concluded that if, though yet an alien, he was required

to risk his life in defence of Canada, he would claim it as a right to

speak and vote upon political questions. Shortly after the Earl of

Durham’s Report had been published, mass meetings were held in several

parts of Upper Canada to discuss the same; and Mr. Klotz was one of

thirty-six men, mostly old settlers of Waterloo county, who by

hand-bills called a public meeting to be held at Preston, on the 10th

day of August, “to take into consideration the deplorable state of the

province of Upper Canada, and to express their opinion thereon, in

concurrence with the great county meeting lately held at Dundas, upon

the glorious report of the Earl of Durham.” One of those handbills is

still preserved by Mr. Klotz as a relic of his younger days. The first

parliamentary election which came on was held at Guelph, and Mr. Klotz

went there to vote. A scrutineer, the late Colonel Hodgins, asked him:

“How long are you in this country, sir?” The answer was given with

firmness: “Not quite ten years, sir;” the response was: “Oh, that will

do; for whom do you vote?” “for Mr. James Durand, sir,” said Mr. Klotz

and left the polling place. Mr. Durand was afterwards declared elected.

After responsible government had been granted to the people of Canada,

and the political party which adopted the name “Conservatives” had been

formed, Mr. Klotz joined that party, and he has ever since supported it

with all his energy. He held for a number of years the office of

secretary of that party in his electoral division, and in later years

that of president of the same. For the celebration of the Peace Jubilee,

held at the county town, Berlin, shortly after the Franco-German war, he

was elected president of the German societies, and as such he delivered

on May 2nd, 1871, in front of the Court House, to an audience of several

thousands, the Peace Jubilee address; and subsequently at the town of

Waterloo, on the occasion of the first “German Saenger Fest” in Ontario,

being held there, he delivered to an overcrowded house at the

Agricultural Hall, the address in German and also in English. The old

Alien Act requiring a residence of seven years before a foreigner could

become a naturalized subject, was felt by many Germans to be too long a

period of probation, especially since it only required five years’

residence in the United States to become a citizen there. Accordingly

Mr. Klotz agitated the matter through the medium of the public press,

and by letters to members of Parliament and to the government. In this

he was ably assisted by other Germans, and their united efforts were

crowned with success, the seven years being first reduced to five, and

later to three years’ residence. An attempt was made by him to induce

the British government to extend the privileges of a person naturalized

in Canada, over the whole British empire; but in this attempt he failed,

although his arguments upon that subject had been kindly forwarded to

the British government, by His Excellency the Governor-General. It

appeared that the reasons for refusal were not on account of Canada, but

of such of the numerous British possessions which still number among its

inhabitants a large body of semi-civilized peoples, through whom serious

difficulties might arise, if such colonies were also to apply and obtain

the like privileges which were asked for Canada. Among the Masonic

fraternity, the name of Otto Klotz has become a household word. He

became a member of the same in 1846, and has ever since been an active

and energetic worker of the Mystic tie. He is an old member of the Grand

Lodge and served without interruption as a member of the Board of

General Purposes since 1864. He made the subject of Benevolence his

special study, and the present system of distributing aid, and of

regulating grants is his work; in acknowledgment of which, the Grand

Lodge presented him in 1873 with a handsome testimonial. He continued

his noble work with unabated energy, adding from time to time

improvements suggested by experience, and in 1885, after twenty-one

consecutive years as chairman of the Committee on Benevolence, the Grand

Lodge conferred upon him the highest honour, by unanimously electing him

a Past Grand Master, and voting for the purchase of a handsome and

costly Grand Master’s regalia, which, with an elaborate address

beautifully engraved, were presented to him at a later day at his mother

lodge, the old Barton, No. 6, in the city of Hamilton, in presence of

one of the largest gatherings of the fraternity ever assembled there.

Besides this great honour conferred upon him, and the many fraternal

greetings and tributes paid him on that occasion by the brethren

assembled, he had the additional pleasure of the presence of three of

his sons, two of whom as Past Masters of Preston lodge, and the youngest

as Master of the Lodge of Strict Observance, in Hamilton; and the

gratification of a most cordial and fraternal reception of them by the

brethren assembled, as worthy sons of a worthy father. The family of Mr.

Klotz and his good wife consists of four sons and two daughters, of whom

three sons and one daughter are married and have families, while the

eldest son and youngest daughter have remained single. They are all

living in comfortable circumstances, highly respected by all who know

them, and the just pride of their aged parents. A family gathering which

occurs once a year is always accompanied by those genuine pleasures

which are in store for a happy family in which strife and bickerings are

unknown quantities. At one of these gatherings the unanimous wish of Mr.

Klotz’s children was expressed that he should retire from business, and

spend with his good wife the remaining years of his life in rest and

comfort. Arrangements were made accordingly, and in 1881, he retired

from business, since which time he has been living on his income, with

his wife and unmarried daughter in a commodious dwelling, enjoying that

repose and comfort which is the just reward of honest industry.

* * * * *

=Waddell, John=, M.D. The late Dr. Waddell, of St. John, New Brunswick,

was the son of the Rev. John Waddell, a native of Shotts, Scotland. The

latter was educated at Glasgow, and came to Nova Scotia in 1797, and

became pastor of the Presbyterian church of Truro. He was married in

1802 to a daughter of Jotham Blanchard (a loyalist from Massachusetts,

and a colonel in one of the loyalist regiments). The Rev. Mr. Waddell

officiated on the occasion of the opening of the old St. Andrew’s Kirk,

in St. John, N.B. (destroyed by the great fire), having delivered the

first sermon in the church in which his son, the subject of this sketch,

fifty years afterwards became a prominent and influential elder. Dr.

Waddell was born in Truro, Nova Scotia, on the 17th of March, 1810. When

quite a boy, his mother died. After attending the Grammar school at

Truro, kept by Mr. James Irving, he entered the Pictou Academy, under

the presidency of Dr. McCulloch (the able Biblical controversialist,

whose discussions with Bishop Burke, of Halifax, made his name famous

throughout Nova Scotia). After leaving the academy, he went into

mercantile business in his native town, and so continued until the

autumn of 1833, when he commenced the study of medicine under Dr. Lynds.

He next proceeded to Glasgow, Scotland, where he pursued his studies

with untiring assiduity, and received his diploma, October 18th, 1839,

from the Royal College of Surgeons, London. He then went to Paris, and

continued there two years, attending the medical lectures given by some

of the most scientific men of the French capital. On his return to Nova

Scotia, in 1840, he commenced the practice of medicine in Truro. The

same year he married Susan, the only daughter of his first medical

teacher, Dr. Lynds. The following year she died. Five years afterwards

he married Jane Walker Blanchard, daughter of Edward Blanchard, of

Truro. In 1849, Dr. Waddell was appointed by His Excellency, Sir Edmund

Head, to the situation of medical superintendent of the New Brunswick

Lunatic Asylum, a position whose arduous and multifarious duties he

discharged with signal success, until his retirement in the spring of

1876, a period of twenty-seven years. When he took charge of the asylum,

at the age of thirty-nine, he was the very personification of vigorous

health. He was tall and finely proportioned. Humanly speaking there was

in him the promise of the attainment of a life of four score years and

more. He sprang from a long-lived race. His step was elastic and his

form erect; his mind was buoyant and full of love for the work he had

but just undertaken. By his kind and gentlemanly manner, he was

singularly capable of dealing with those unfortunates who required so

much of paternal care and solicitude. And yet, with this urbanity and

goodness, there was firmness of character, so much required by the rules

of discipline, which never failed to exact obedience, but it was the

obedience of a child to a parent. When Dr. Waddell assumed the duties of

his office, there were but eighty patients in the establishment, which

number gradually increased until the figures reached, at the time of his

retirement, three hundred, besides about fifty domestics. With every

successive year, from 1849, there was a steady increase of work—work of

the most sorrowful description—and with it a corresponding amount of

care, anxiety and responsibility. And yet, Dr. Waddell worked on, day

after day, in the same unwearied round for twenty-seven years, devoting

the flower of his days, his vigour, his manhood to a task which led

ultimately to the destruction of a once powerful constitution. At the

earnest request of his family—whose members had always been closely

knit and compacted together by the most tender cords of affection—he

retired from the asylum in the spring of 1876, under the expectation

that with rest and freedom from care and anxiety, he would be enabled to

take a new lease of life. But instead of that repose for which

retirement was sought, it was found that a change from an active to a

passive life was more than his shattered constitution could withstand.

The day he laid down his staff and turned his back upon the asylum he

loved so well and served so faithfully, that day Dr. Waddell’s work upon

earth was ended. Bowed down with the infirmities of a premature old age,

he lingered till August 29th, 1878, when he passed away at the age of

sixty-eight. Probably no man in the province of New Brunswick was better

or more generally known than Dr. Waddell, and there are few whose name

and works will be held in more grateful remembrance by its inhabitants.

His only surviving child, Susan Lynds (by his second marriage), was

married August 30th, 1881, to the Rev. Lorenzo Gorham Stevens, rector of

St. Luke’s Church, Portland, St. John, N.B., a sketch of whose life will

be found elsewhere.

* * * * *

A Cyclopaedia of Canadian Biography: Being Chiefly Men of the Time A Collection of Persons Distinguished in Professional and Political Life, Leaders in the Commerce and Industry of Canada, and Successful Pioneers · 第 9 / 64 题