II. 315
Arnold, Matthew, _Culture and Anarchy_, 1869; II. 57
Atzberger, Dr. L., continuation of Dr. J. Scheeben’s _Dogmatik_,
Vol. IV., 1903; II. 227
Augustine, St., ed. Ben. Reprint Gaume, _Confessiones_, I. c. 2; II. 213
VI. c. 15, VII. c. 12, VIII. cc. 5, 11; II. 293
X. c. 26, XIII. c. 17; II. 213
XI. cc. 11, 20; II. 248
XI. c. 23 § 1; II. 306
XI. c. 27 § 3; II. 248
_De Civitate Dei_, lib. xxi. c. 26 _n._ 4; II. 211
_Contra Julianum_, IV. 58 (Vol. X. col. 1073 _c_); II. 128
_De Nuptiis et concupisc._, I. 8 (Vol. X. col. 613 _a_); II. 128
I. 23; II. 293
_De Octo Dulcitii quaest._, 12, 13; II. 217, 244
_De Trinitate_, L. XV. c. 16; II. 248
_Enarratio_ in Ps. xxxvi. § i _n._ 10; II. 211
_Enchiridion_, CX. CXII; II. 225
_Liber de Fide_, I. 27, 29; II. 317
_Opus imperfectum_, III. 56; II. 293
_De Peccato Orginali_, 40 (Vol. X. col. 590 _b_); II. 128
_Tract in Joannis Ev._, VIII. 1; II. 306
XXIV. 1; II. 306
Avicenna, _Comm. in Arist. Metaph., Tract._ VIII. c. 6; II. 315
Bacher, Prof. W., _Die Agada der Palästinensischen Amoräer_, Vol. I.
1892; II. 234
Baring-Gould, Rev. S., _Lives of the Saints_, 1898, Vol. X., Sept.
15; I. 92; II. 22
Baruch, _Apocalypse of_, XXX. 2; II. 214
Basil, St., _Prooemium in Reg. Fus. Tract_, _n._ 3; II. 166
Bellarmine, Cardinal, _De Gratia primi hominis_, XIV.; II. 214
_De Purgat_, I. c. IV. 6, c. XIV. 22; II. 245
Lib. II. c. 11; II. 217
Benedicti XIV., _De Servorum Beatificatione et Beatorum
Canonizatione_, 1743, Vol. II. p. 239 _a_; I. 126, 253, 254
Bergson, H., _Les Données Immédiates de la Conscience_, ed. 1898;
II. 7 _n._ 1, 165
Berkeley, George, Bp., _Alciphron_, IV. _nos._ 17-21; II. 288
Bernard, St., _Sermons on the Canticle of Cant._, ch. XXVI.; I. 385
_Tract. de Gratia et Lib. Arbitrio_, ch. XIV. § 47; I. 69-70
Blondel, Maurice, Prof., _L’Action_, 1893; I. 48 _n._ 1; II. 7 _n._ 1
Bossuet, J. B., Bishop, Œuvres, ed. 1816, 1817, _Sermons_, Vol. XI.
p. 376; II. 218
_Instruction sur les Etats d’Oraison_, and Documents, Vol. XXVII.;
II. 131 _n._
_Relation sur le Quiétism_, Vol. XXIX.; II. 141
Boudhinon, Abbé A., “Sur l’Histoire des Indulgences,” in _Revue d’Hist.
et de Litt. Relig._, 1898; I. 121; II. 242
Bousset, W., _Die Religion des Judenthums_, 1903; II. 153 _n._ 1
Boutroux, Emile, Prof., “La Psychologie du Mysticisme,” _Bull. de l’Inst.
Psych. Internat._, 1902; II. 61
Brieger, T., Prof., “N. Paulus’ Johann Tetzel,” in _Theol.
Literaturzeitung_, 1900; II. 232
Bugge, _Die Hauptparabeln Jesu_, 1900; II. 156
Butler, Abbot, E. Cuthbert, O.S.B., _The Lausiac History of Palladius_,
1898, 1904; II. 371
Cadrès, Alphonse, S.J., _le Père Jean N. Grou_, 1866; II. 363 _n._
Caird, Edward, _Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers_, Vol. I,
Lecture XIII.; II. 264 _n._ 2
Vol. II. L. XIV.; II. 251, 320
LL. XXII. XXIII.; II. 325-327
L. XXV.; II. 273
L. XXVI.; II. 335
“St. Paul and the Idea of Evolution,” _Hibbert Journal_, Vol. II.;
II. 119
Cajetanus, Card, _Comm. in Summam_, II., ii., qu. 23, art. 1.; II. 162
Celesia, P., Vinc., _Storia dell’Ospedale di Pammatone_ (MS.); I.
155 _n._ 1, 308 _n._ 1
Chantepie de la Saussaye, _Lehrbuch der Religions-Geschichte_, Vol. I.,
ed. 1887; ed. 1905; II. 183
Charles, Dr. R. H., _Critical Hist. of the doctrine of Future Life_,
1899; II. 189, 190, 220
Class, Prof. G., _Phänomenologie u. Ontologie des menschl-Geistes_, 1896;
II. 229 _n._ 2
Clement, of Alexandria, _Paedagogus_, I. c. VIII.; II. 235
_Stromata_, I. c. XXVI. 168, 2 (Stählin); II. 234
IV. c. IV. 15, 6 (St.); II. 166
IV. c. VI. 30, 1 (St.); II. 166
IV. c. XXIV. 154, 3 (St.); II. 236
V. c. III. 16, 7 (St.); II. 236
VII. c. VI.; II. 216
VII. c. XXVI.; II. 234
Coconnier, Père, M.Th., _L’Hypnotisme Franc_, 1897; II. 6 _n._ 2
Corderins, Bathazar, S.J., “Quaestio Mystica,” in _Dionysius Areop.,
Migne._, Vol. I. pp. 1050-1058; II. 288
Crusius, O., _Erwin Rhode_, 1902; II. 191, 192
Dante, _Purgatorio_, II. 40-42; II. 244
Deharbe, Joseph, S.J., _Die Volkommene Liebe Gottes_; II. 162,
170 _n._ 1
Denifle, H. S., Father, “Meister Eckharts Lateinische Schriften,” in
_Arch f. Litt. u. Kirchengesch. des M. A._, 1886; II. 294, 315, 317
Denzinger, H., _Enchiridion Definitionum_, ed. 1888, No. 38;
I. 448 _n._ 1
No. 73; I. 217
Nos. 387, 588, 859; II. 242
No. 363; I. 120, 121
No. 454; II. 323
Nos. 437, 455; II. 318
Dilthey, W., Prof., “Auffassung d. Menschen, i. 15 _u._ 16, Jahrh.,” in
_Arch. f. Gesh. der Philosophie_, 1892; II. 119
Dionysius, the Areopagite (tr. Parker, Oxford, 1897, 1899), _Divine
Names_, I. i; II. 95, 98
I. 5; II. 97, 99
I. 6; II. 100
III. i; II. 91, 98
IV. 1; II. 93
IV. 2; II. 94
IV. 5; II. 93
IV. 6; II. 97
IV. 8-10; II. 95
IV. 13; II. 96
IV. 13, 4, 16; I. 353
IV. 22; II. 222
IV. 23; II. 224, 228
IV. 24; II. 222, 228, 236, 294
V. 1; II. 314
VII. 1, 3; II. 95
VIII. 3, 5; II. 100
VIII. 7; II. 92
IX. 4; II. 91, 92
IX. 5; II. 99
XI. 1; II. 94
_Eccl. Hierarchy_, I. 2; II. 99
III. 3, 7; II. 99
_Heavenly Hierarchy_, XV. 2; II. 94
XV. 3; II. 98
_Mystic Theology_, I.; II. 95, 97
III.; II. 95, 97, 289-290, 314
IV.; II. 314
V.; II. 98
_Documenti su S. Caterina_ (Bibl-Univ. Genoa), I. 115 _n._ 1, 149 _n._ 1,
171 _n._ 1, 172 _n._ 1, 179 _n._ 1, 310 _n._ 2, 376-379
Dubors, F., Abbé, “Le feu du Purgatoire, est-il un feu corporal?” _Revue
du Clergé Français_, 1902, II. 218
Duhm, B., Prof., _das Geheinniss in der Religion_, 1896; II. 6 _n._ 3,
159 _n._ 2
Eckhart, Meister, _Werke_, ed. Pfeiffer, 1857; II. 318, 323
Elliott, Walter, _The Life of Father Hecker_, 1894; II. 56
Emery, Abbé J. A., _Sur la Mitigation des Peines des Damnés_; II. 226
Enoch, Book of; II. 239
Esra, IV. iv. 35; II. 213-214
Eucken, R., Prof., _Der Kampf um einen geistig. Lebensinhalt_, 1896;
II. 271
_Der Wahrheitsgehalt der Religion_, 1901; II. 269, 296
_Die Lebensanschaungen der grossen Denker_; I. 39 _n._ 3
Euripides, _Orestes_, XXX.; II. 237
Faber, Rev. F. W., _All for Jesus_, ed. 1889, ch. IX., § 3-5; I. 89;
II. 244, 245
Federici, F., _Famiglie Nobili di Genova_, MS., I. 157 _n._ 1;
II. 231 _n._
Fechner, G. T., _Die Drei Gründe u. Motive des Glaubens_, 1863;
II. 231 _n._ 1
Fénelon, Fr. de S., Archbishop; Œuvres, Versailles, 1817-1821, _Epistle
II to Pope Clement XI_, Vol. IX; I. 68, 69; II. 161
_Explication … des Propositions de Molinos_, Vol. IV.; II. 142
_Existence de Dieu_, Vol. I; I. 1, 31; II. 5
_Instruction pastorale_, 1697, Vol. IV; II. 131, 161
_Lettre sur la Charité_, Vol. IX; II. 161
_Lettre sur l’Oraison Passive_, Vol. VIII; II. 131, 161, 173, 174
_Première Réponse aux Difficultés de M. l’Evêque de Chartres_, Vol.
IV; II. 161
_Seconde Lettre à M. de Paris_, Vol. V; II. 181
Ficino Marsilio, _Theologia Platonica_, 1482; II. 203, 204
Francis, St., de Sales, _Les Controverses_ in _Œuvres_, ed. 1892, Vol. I.
pt. iii. ch. II.; II. 245
Froude, R. E., “Scientific Speculation and the Unity of Truth,” _Dublin
Review_, Oct. 1900; II. 369
Gardner, Percy, Prof., _New Chapters in Greek History_, 1892, pp. 333-334;
II. 188
_Oxford at the Cross Roads_, 1903; II. 57
Gebirol Ibn., _Fons Vitae_, ed. 1895; II. 316
Giovo, Angelo, _Vita di S. Caterina_ (MS.); I. 172 _n._, 310 _n._ 2
Giustiniano, Agostino, _Castigatissimi Annali della Rep. di Genova_,
1537; I. 382-384
Görres, Joseph, _Die Christliche Mystik_, 1836, 1842; II. 305
Gosselin, Abbé, _Analyse raisonnée de la Controverse du Quiétisme_
(Fénelon, Œuvres, Vol. IV.); II. 162, 172, 173
_Vie de M. Emery_, 1862, Vol. II.; II. 226
Gousset, Cardinal, _Théologie Dogmatique_, 1856, Vol. II.; II. 217
Grafe, E., “Verhältniss der paulinischen Schriften zur Sapientia
Salomonis,” in _Theol. Abhandl. C. von. Weizsäcker Gewidmet_, 1892;
II. 66
Grandgeorge, M. L., _St. Augustin et le Neo-Platonisme_, 1896; I. 126,
127, 130, 131; II. 293
Greg, W. E., _Enigmas of Life_; II. 227, 231
Gregory, St., of Nazianzum, _Poema de Seipso_; I. 546; II. 216
St., of Nyssa, _Catecheticus_, VIII. c. 35; II. 244
_Orationes_, XL. 36; II. 216
Grou, Jean N., S.J., _Méditations sur l’Amour de Dieu_; II. 307
Gunkel, Prof. H., _die Wirkungen des H. Geistes_, ed. 1899; II. 6 _n._ 1
Harnack, Prof. A., _Das Wesen des Christenthums_, 1902; II. 352
_Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte_, ed. 1888, Vol. II.; II. 351
Hase, Carl von, _Handbuch der protest. Polemik_, ed. 1864; II. 231 _n._ 1
Hedley, Bishop J. C., _The Spiritual Letters of Fénelon_, 1892, Vol. I.
Preface; II. 161
Heppe, Heinrich, Prof., _Geschichte der Quietistischen Mystik_, 1875;
II. 139-140
Hermann, Wilhelm, Prof., _Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott_, 1892; II.
263-265, 332, 333
Hesiod, _Works and Days_, II. 187
Höffding, H., Prof., _Söron Kirkegaard_, 1896; II. 285, 288, 345, 346,
353
Holtzmann, H. J., Prof., _Lehrbuch der Neutestamentlichen Theologie_,
1897; I. 30 _n._; II. 153 _n._
Vol. II., ch. i.; II. 63 _n._ 2, 72, 73, 321, 322
Vol. II., ch. iii.; II. 79 _n._, 190
_Richard Rothe’s Speculative System_, 1899; II. 229, 247, 248,
269, 270, 377, 378
Homer, _Iliad_, VIII. 17-20; II. 93
XX. 232 _seq._; II. 186-187
_Od._ IV. 560-568; II. 186-187
Hurter, H., Father, S.J., _Theologiae Dogmaticae Compendium_, 1893,
Vol. III.; II. 242
Inge, W. R., Prof., _Christian Mysticism_, 1897; I. 30 _n._ 1;
II. 305 _n._
Jacopone da Todi, _Laudi Spirituali_, ed. Florence, 1490; I. 259-260
_Lauda_, XIII. _v._ 1-7, 8; II. 102
XXIII. _v._ 1-6, 10; _ibid._
XXV. _v._ 7, 10, 11; _ibid._
XLV.; II. 103
LVIII. _a_, _v._ 10, 11, 12; _ibid._
LVIII. _b_, 1-9; II. 204
LVIII. _v._ 3, 8, 11-14, 16, 19, 20-22; II. 104
LVIII. _v._ 23; II. 104, 259, 275
LVIII. _v._ 24, 26, 27, 28-30; II. 105
LXXIV. _v._ 6; _ibid._
LXXIV. _v._ 13; II. 106
LXXIX. _v._ 3, 6, 16, 24, 26; II. 106
LXXXI. _v._ 17; II. 106
LXXXIII. _v._ 5, 15; _ibid._
LXXXVII. _v._ 12-20; II. 109
LXXXVIII. _v._ 5, 6, 7, 10; II. 107
LXXXVIII. _v._ 11; II. 107, 219 _n._ 2
LXXXVIII. _v._ 14, 21, 22, 27; II. 107
LXXXVIII. _v._ 32, 33; II. 108
LXXXIX. _v._ 12, 13, 52-54, 70, 98; _ibid._
LXXXX. _v._ 4, 13; _ibid._
LXXXX. _v._ 18; II. 109
LXXXXIX. _v._ 6, 12, 13, 14; _ibid._
James, William, Prof., _The Principles of Psychology_, 1891, Vol. II.;
II. 194
_Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902; II. 30, 41 _n._ 1, 48,
266, 338 _n._ 1, 342
_The Will to Believe_, 1897; I. 51 _n._ 1
Janet, Pierre, Prof., _l’Automatisme Psychologique_, ed. 1903; II. 192
_Etat Mental des Hysteriques_, 1892, 1894, Vol. I.; II. 22-25
Vol. II.; II. 22, 23, 25
Jastrow, Morice, Prof., _The Study of Religion_, 1901; II. 269
Jerome, St., _Apol. c. Rufinum_, II.; II. 216
_Ep._, 124, 7; II. 216
_In Isa._ lxv. 24; II. 216
John, St., of Cross, Works, tr. David Lewis, ed. 1889:
_Ascent of Mt. Carmel_, Bk. I. ch. v. (pp. 26, 27); II. 51, 206
Bk. II. ch. viii. (94); II. 343, 344
Bk. II. ch. viii. (95-97); II. 343
Bk. II. ch. x. (102); II. 51
Bk. II. ch. xix. (159); II. 51, 306
Bk. II. ch. xix. (163); II. 51
Bk. II. ch. xxii. (195); II. 51, 306
Bk. III. ch. viii. (264, 265); II. 51, 306
Bk. III. ch. xix. (298); I. 68
Bk. III. ch. xxii. (307, 308); II. 354
Bk. III. ch. xxxvi. (353); II. 345
_Spiritual Canticle_, St. VII. (206, 207); II. 51, 257, 258
St. XIII. (238); II. 51
_Letters_, L. XIV. (541, 542); I. 68
John, St., Damascene, _De Fide Orthodoxa_, II. 216 _n._ 1
Joly, Henry, _Psychology of the Saints_, Engl. tr. 1898; II. 61
Jones, Henry, Prof., _A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Lotze_,
1895; II. 278, 279
Josephus, _Antiquities_, XI. ii. 3; II. 239
Juliana, Mother, of Norwich, _Sixteen Revelations of Divine Love_, ed.
1902; II. 94, 218, 306, 307
Jülicher, A., _Gleichnissreden Jesu_, Th. II. 1899; II. 153 _n._ 1
Kant, Immanuel, _Anthropologie_, Werke, Berlin, Vol. VII., 1907; II. 165
_Briefe_, Werke, Berlin, Vol. I., 1900; II. 278
“Der Kanon der reinen Vernunft,” in _Kritik der reinen Vernunft_,
ed. Kehrbach: Werke, Berlin, Vol. III.; II. 177, 178
_Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten_, Werke, Berlin, Vol. IV.,
1903; II. 178, 296
_Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft_, ed.
Hartenstein, Werke, Berlin, Vol. VI., 1907; II. 260, 296
Koch, Dr. Hugo, _Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita_, 1900; II. 91 _n._ 1, 95
Krätzschmar, R., Prof., _Das Buch Ezechiel_, 1900; II. 46
Laberthonnière, Abbé L., in _Annales de Philosophic Chrétienne_, 1905,
1906; II. 307 _n._ 3
Leibniz, G. W. (Philosophische Schriften, ed. Gerhardt, 1882-1885).
_Nouveaux Essais sur l’Entendement_, Vol. V.; II. 265, 266, 338
_Principes de la Nature et de la Grace_, Vol. VI., 1885; II. 176
Lejeune, Abbé P., _Manuel de Théologie Mystique_, 1897; II. 307
Lessing, G. E., _Leibniz von den Ewigen Strafen_, in Lessing’s, Werke,
ed. Lachmann-Muncker, Vol. XI., 1895; II. 257, 258
Lightfoot, Bishop J. B., _St. Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians_, 1881;
II. 43-44 _n._ 1
Loyola, St. Ignatius of, _Testament_, 1900, p. 91, 92; II. 31
Maineri, Padre, S. J., _Vita di S. Caterina_; I. 92, 302, 303 _n._ 1,
302 _n._ 1
Manning, H. E., Cardinal, _Treatise on Purgatory by St. Catherine of
Genoa_, 1886, Appendix; II. 237, 243
MS. “A”; I. 112 _n._ 1, 384, 392
Ch. 7 (of MS.) p. 24; I. 136 _n._ 2
Ch. 10 (of MS.) 40; I. 390 _n._ 4
Ch. 15 (of MS.) 87, 88; I. 387
(of MS.) 92; I. 162 _n._ 3
Ch. 20 (of MS.) 134; I. 387
Ch. 24 (of MS.) 160; I. 386-387
(of MS.) 163; I. 388
(of MS.) 168; I. 387, 390 _n._ 3
Ch. 25 (of MS.) 169; I. 388
(of MS.) 174; I. 402, _n._ 2
Ch. 29 (of MS.) 193; I. 187 _n._ 1, 387-388 (no. is omitted in MS.)
Ch. 31 (of MS) 198-200; I. 387
Ch. 42 (of MS.) 329; I. 387
348; I. 452
361, 363, 364; I. 386
366; I. 147 _n._ 1
394, 395, 396; I. 412-416
MS. “B,” 1 _v_; I. 396
Ch. 5 (of MS.) f. 2 _r_, _v_; I. 394
(of MS.) f. 19 _r_; I. 394
Ch. 24 (of MS.) f. 30 _r_, _v_; I. 395
MS. “F”; I. 216
Mercier, D., Cardinal, _Critériologie Générale_, ed. 1900; II. 7 _n._ 1
Mill, J. Stuart, _Autobiography_, 1875; II. 339
_Three Essays on Religion_, 1874; II. 231
Molinos, M. de, _Guida Spirituale_, French, tr., in Recueil de Diverses
Pièces concernant le Quiétisme, Amsterdam, 1688; II. 146
Morro, Giuseppe, _Inaugurazione della Statua d’Ettore Vernazza_, 1863;
I. 146 _n._ 1, 167, 317 _n._ 1, 320, 324-329, 331 _n._ 1, 333, 364,
365, 381 _n._ 2, 382 _n._ 2
Münsterberg, Prof., _Grundzüge der Psychologie_, Vol I., 1900; II. 303
_Psychology and Life_, 1899; II. 302-303
Mystiker, deutsche, des Mittelalters, Vol. I., David von Augsburg, ed.
Pfeiffer, 1845; II. 363 _n._
Newman, John Henry, Cardinal, _Grammar of Assent_, 1870; II. 230
_Idea of a University_, ed. 1873; II. 369
_The Via Media_, Vol. I., Preface, 1877; I. 53 _n._
Nicholas, of Coes (Cusanus), Cardinal, _Exercitationum_, Lib. VIII.;
II. 256
Oldenberg, _Buddha_, 1897; II. 183-185
Origen, _Contra Celsum_, IV. 13; II. 236
VII. 13; II. 236, 239
_De Orat._, XXIX. 15 (263); II. 234-235, 239
_De Princ._, II. 10, 4; II. 216
_In Rom._, T. II. i. 477; II. 245
Pammatone Hospital _Cartulary_, 62; I. 98 _n._ i, 300, 312
Doc. nos. 8, 14, 30; I. 125
Parpera, Giacinto, _B Caterina da Genova … illustrata_, 1682; I. 92,
305 _n._ 1
Pattison, A. S. Pringle, Prof., _Hegelianism and Personality_, ed. 1893;
II. 318
“Martineau’s Philosophy,” _Hibbert Journal_, Vol. I., 1902; II. 330
Pescetto, G. B., _Biografia Medica Ligure_, 1846, Vol. I.; I. 201 _n._ 3,
451 _n._ 1
Petavius (Petau), Denys, S.J., _Dogmata Theologica_, ed. Fournials, 1866,
Vol. IV., _De Angelis_, III. viii. 16, 17; II. 225-226
Petre, M. D., _The Soul’s Orbit_, 1904; II. 308
Philo, _Legg. Alleg._, I. 3; II. 80
_Pirke Aboth_, V. 23; II. 154
Plato, _Cratylus_; II. 67
400 _c_; II. 237
_Gorgias_, 477 _a_; II. 235
523 _b-e_, 525 _b_, _c_, 526 _c_, _d_; II. 208-209
_Laws_, 904 _a-e_; II. 206
_Parmenides_, 134 _c_; I. 19
_Phaedo_, 64, 67 _c_, 69 _c_; I. 18
81 _a_, 82 _a_; II. 205
81 _c_; II. 66
110 _b_-114 _d_; II. 206-208
_Phaedrus_, 245 _d_; II. 320
246 _b_, _c_; II. 103
249 _b_; II. 210
_Philebus_, 22 _c_; II. 312
_Republic_, II. 10 _c_, V. 460 _c_; II. 186
II. 364, _b_, _c_, _e_; II. 235
II. 364 _e_; II. 236
V. 471 _c_-VIII.; II. 186
VI. 508 _c_; II. 94, 312
VII. 517 _b_; II. 312
VII. 518 _b_; I. 18
IX 560 _d_-588 _a_; II. 186
X. 595 _a_-608 _b_; II. 186
X. 616 _b_, _c_; II. 93
X. 617 _e_, 619 _e_, 920 _e_; II. 210
_Symposium_, 197 _a_; II. 104
216 _e_; II. 64
_Theaetetus_, 153 _c_; II. 93, 94
168 _a_; I. 18
176 _a_; I. 19
_Timaeus_, 28 _a_, _c_; II. 312
29 _e_ seq.; II. 334
41 _d_, _e_, 42 _d_; II. 206
92 _c_; II. 312
Plotinus, _Enneads_, I. vii. 1, 61 _d_; II. 312
I. viii. 2, 72 _e_; II. 312
V. i. 3, 6; II. 323
V. ii.; II. 326
V. v. 8; II. 95
VI. viii. 16; II. 312
VI. ix. 4; II. 192
VI. ix. 8-9; II. 96
VI. ix. 9; II. 91
VI. ix. 9-11; II. 323
VI. ix. 11; II. 95, 104
Proclus, _In Cratylum_, 103, 107; II. 93
_Institutio Theologica_, c. 31, 35; II. 91
c. 129; II. 99
_In Parmenidem_, IV. 34; II. 93, 100
VI. 52; II. 95
_In Platonis Alcibidem_, II. 78; II. 93
Platonic Theology, III. 132; II. 95
Rauwenhoff, L. W. E., Prof., _Religions-philosophie_, Germ. tr., 1894;
II. 269 _n._ 2, 291 _n._ 1, 328
Reinach, S., _Cultes, Mythes et Religions_, Vol. I. 1905; II. 233, 234
Reumont, Alfred von, _Vittoria Colonna_, 1881; I. 341 _n._ 1
Reusch, F. H., _Der Index der verbotenen Bücher_, 1885, Vol. II.; II. 141
Rhode, Erwin, _Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. I.; II. 185, 188
Vol. II.; II. 125 _n._ 1, 185, 235, 237, 356, 357, 368
Rickert, H., Prof., _die Grenzen der naturwissenschaftlichen
Begriffsbildung_, 1902; II. 370 _n._
Royce, Josiah, Prof., _The World and the Individual_, 1901, Vol. II.;
II. 256 _n._ 4
Ruysbroek Johannes, “Zierde der geistlichen Hochzeit,” _Vier Schriften_,
ed. Ullmann, 1848, ch. xlvi. 107, 108; II. 324
Sandreau, Abbé A., _L’Etat Mystique_, 1903; _La Vie d’Union à Dieu_,
1900; II. 307 _n._ 3
Schiller, F. C. S., Dr., “Activity and Substance,” in _Humanism_, 1903;
II. 131, 132, 250 _n._ 1
“The Desire for Immortality,” in same; II. 197
Schmöger, K. E., _Leben der gottscligen Anna Katharina Emmerich_,
1869-70; II. 335
Schopenhauer, Arthur, _Die Welt als Wille u. Vorstellung_, ed. Grisebach,
Vol. I., Anhang; II. 274
Vol. II., bk. iv., ch. 48; II. 342
Schwab, J. B., _Johannes Gerson_, 1858; II. 325
Schweizer, Albert, _Die Religions-Philosophie Kants_; 1899, II. 177
Scotus, John, Eriugena, _De divisione naturae_; II. 314
_De rerum principio_; II. 316, 317
Seneca, L. Annaeus, _Natur. Quaest._, Bk. III. ch. xx. 7, ch. xxx. 7, 8;
II. 240
Seth, James, _A Study of Ethical Principles_, 1894; II. 57 _n._ 1,
180 _n._ 3
Simmel, Prof. Georg, _Kant_, 1904; II. 179, 260, 261
Smith, W. Robertson, Prof., _The Prophets of Israel_, ed. 1882; II. 267
Spinoza, ed. Van Vloten and Land, 1895, _Ethica_, Part II., Defin.
vi., 75; II. 294
Part IV., Prop. lxiv., Coroll., 225; II. 294
Part V., Prop. xix., 251; II. 175, 176
Prop. xli., 264; II. 175, 176
Prop. xli., Scholion, 265; II. 175, 176
_Tractatus Theologico-Politicus_, Cap. IV., Vol. II. 3, 4;
II. 175-176
Stade, B., Prof., _Biblische Theologie des Alten Testaments_, 1905,
Vol. I.; II. 191
Sticker, Fr., Urban, Bollandist, _Life of St. Catherine_, in Acta
Sanctorum, Sept., Vol. V., ed. 1866, 123-195; I. 94, 167
183 _b-e_; I. 466 _n._ 2
192-196; I. 342 _n._ 1
Strata Battista, _Atti Notarili_, in “Archivio di Stato,” Genova;
I. 379 _n._ 1
Suarez, Francesco, Fr., S.J., Opera, Vol. IV., Disp. XI., sec. iv.,
art. 2; II. 241
XLVII., sec. 1, art. 6; II. 241
Sulze, Emile, _Wie ist der Kampf um die Bedeutung … Jesu zu beendigen?_
1901; II. 372, 373
Taylor, A. E., _The Problem of Conduct_, 1901; II. 169, 179-181, 274
Tennant, Rev. F. R., _The Origin and Propagation of Sin_, 1902; II. 296,
299-300
Teresa, St., _Life Written by Herself_, Eng. tr., D. Lewis, 1888, Ch.
iv. 17; II. 11
Ch. v. 23, 27, 28, 29; II. 14; 5, 11; 13, 20; 13
Ch. vi. 30, 31; II. 10, 11
Ch. vii. 40, 41; II. 21, 50
Ch. ix. 57, 58; II. 18 _n._ 1
Ch. xiii. 86; II. 15
Ch. xviii. 124, 130; II. 324, 325
Ch. xix. 136; II. 44
Ch. xx. 146, 149; II. 324, 44
Ch. xxii. 162-174: II. 169
Ch. xxiii. 174; II. 325
Ch. xxv. 190 _b_, _c_, 192 _c_, 193 _a_, 196 _b_; II. 48-49
Ch. xxvii. 206; II. 50
Ch. xxviii. 224; II. 48-49
Ch. xxix. 231, 234, 235; II. 18; 10; 11, 20, 44
Ch. xxx. 247; II. 18
Ch. xxxi. 248, 249, 251; II. 21
Ch. xxxii. 263; II. 11
Ch. xxxv. 295; II. 48-49
Ch. xxxviii. 335; II. 325
Rel. vii. 408; II. 16 _n._ 1(2), 50
Rel. viii. 420, 421, 423; II. 5, 44; 324; 20
Rel. ix. 430, 431; II. 325; 48, 49
Thomas Aquinas, St., _De Beatitudine_, ch. iii. 3; II. 151-152
_De Ente et Essentia_, c. 11; II. 316
_In libr. Boetii de Trinitate_, ed. Ven. 2, ch. viii. 291 _a_,
341 _b_, 342 _a_; II. 289, 337
_In libros Sententiarum_, Sent. II., dist. 30, qu. 1, art. 2;
II. 163
Sent. III., dist. 30, art. 5; II. 164
_Summa contra Gentiles_, I. 1-3, c. 70 in fine; I. 81
Lib. II. c. xciv. inst.; c. xciii; II. 256
Lib. III. c. xxi. in fine; II. 253
_Summa Theologica_, I. qu. 4, art. 1 concl.; II. 250
I. qu. 8, art. 2; II. 338
I. qu. 12, art. 1 in corp.; II. 257, 338
I. qu. 12, art. 6 ad 1; II. 257
I. qu. 12, art. 7, in corp.; II. 257
I. qu. 12, art. 8 ad 4; II. 253
I. qu. 12, art. 10, in corp.; II. 248
I. qu. 13, art. 5, concl., et in corp.; II. 337
I. qu. 14, art. 2 ad 2; II. 253
I. qu. 14, art. 4, in corp.; II. 252
I. qu. 14, art. 8, concl.; II. 253
I. qu. 14, art. 11 ad. 3 contra et concl.; II. 253
I. qu. 19, art. 1, concl.; II. 252
I. qu. 19, art. 2, in corp.; II. 254
I. qu. 20, art. 1 ad 1 ad 3; II. 254
I. qu. 20, art. 1, concl.; II. 252
I. qu. 20, art. 2 ad 1; II. 254
I. qu. 25, art. 1 ad 2, and concl.; II. 250
I. qu. 28, art 1, in corp. and ad 2; II. 163
I. qu. 29, art. 3 ad 2 ad 4, and in corp.; II. 256
I. qu. 47, art. 1, in corp.; II. 256
I. ii. qu. 3, art. 2 ad 4; II. 253
I. ii. qu. 3, art. 2 ad 4, and concl.; II. 252
I. ii. qu. 28, art. 1 ad 2, and in corp.; II. 163
I. ii. qu. 86, art. 1 ad 3, and concl.; II. 236, 294
I. ii. qu. 114, art. 4, in corp.; II. 164
II. ii. qu. 3, art. 4 ad 4; II. 254
II. ii. qu. 17, art. 8, in corp.; II. 162
II. ii. qu. 23, art. 6, concl. and in corp.; II. 163
III. qu. 85, art. 2 ad 1; II. 164
III. suppl., qu. 6, art. 3; I. 120, 121
Suppl., qu. 62, art. 2; II. 127, 128
Suppl., qu. 69, art. 1 ad 3, and in corp.; II. 214
Suppl., qu. 69, art. 6, in corp.; _ib._
Suppl., qu. 69, art. 7, concl.; _ib._
Suppl., qu. 69, art. 7 ad 9; II. 223
Append.; qu. 2, art 4, in corp. and ad 4; II. 244
_App. de Purg._, art. 2, in corp.; II. 214
Tiele, C. P., Prof., _Elements of the Science of Religion_, 1897,
Vol. I.; II. 262-263
Vol. II.; II. 268-270, 340
Touzard, Abbé J., “Le Développement de la Doctrine del Immortalité,”
_Revue Biblique_, 1898, pp. 207-241; II. 189
Trendelenburg, A., “Ueber den letzten Unterschied d. philos. Systeme,”
_Beiträge z. Philos._ 1855, II. 10; II. 375
Troeltsch, Prof. Ernst, “Das Historische in Kant’s
Religions-philosophie,” _Kant Studien_, 1904; II. 261, 262
“Religions-philosophie,” in _Die Philosophie im Beginn des XXten
Jahrh._, 1904, Vol. I; II. 327, 376 _n._ 1
“Die Selbständigkeit der Religion,” _Zeitschr. f. Theologie u.
Kirche_, 1895; II. 399
“Grundprobleme der Ethik,” in _Zeitschr. f. Theologie u. Kirche_,
1902; II. 127 _n._ 1, 273, 274, 358, 359
“Geschichts philosophie,” _Theol. Rundschau_, 1893, II. 256, 257
“Was heisst Wesen des Christenthums?” _Christliche Welt_, 1903;
II. 359, 360
Turmel, Abbé Joseph, “Le Dogme du Pêché Originel dans S. Augustin,”
_Rev. d’Hist. et de Litt. Rel._, 1901, 1902; II. 29 _n._ 1
Tyrrell, Rev. George, _Hard Sayings_, 1898; I. 89; II. 230
_Lex Orandi_, 1903; II. 268, 337 _n._ 1
_The faith of the Millions_, 1901, Vol. II.; II. 353, 354
Ueberweg-Heinze, _Grundriss d. Gesch. d. Philosophie_, Part II., ed.
1898; II. 314, 316, 317
Vallebona, Sebastiano, _La Perla dei Fieschi_, ed. 1887, I. 129 _n._ 3,
144, 145 _n._ 1, 337, 338 _n._ 1
Vernazza Battista, Ven., _Opere Spirituali, Genova_, 1755, Vol. I.
Preface; I. 100, 117, 344 _n._ 2
Vol. V. 218-227, _Colloquii_; I. 346-358
Vol. VI. 192-248, _Letters_; I. 343-344, 359-364, 409 _n._ 1, 2
_Vita e Dottrina di S. Caterina da Genova._ Nona Ed. Genovese. Sordi-Muti
(no date). Preface, vii_c_; I. 413, 414
viii_a_, _b_; _ibid._
viii_b_; I. 281
_Vita_-proper, Cap. I. 3; I. 104 _n._ 1
3_c_; I. 127
Cap. II. 4_a_, _b_, _c_; I. 105
4_a_-5_b_; I. 404-406
4_a_-5_c_; I. 458-460
4_c_-5_a_; I. 107, 108
4_c_; I. 108 _n._ 1
5_a-c_; _ibid._
5_b_; I. 181-412
5_b-c_; I. 108 _n._ 2
5_c_-6; I. 112, 121 _n._ 3
6; I. 118-119
6_a_; I. 334 _n._ 1
6_b_; I. 118, 412
6_c_; I. 397
Cap. III. 7_a_; I. 114 _n._ 2
7_b_; I. 116
8_a_; I. 280
8-9; I. 115
8_c_; I. 263, 273, 280
9_b_; I. 180 _n._ 3, 263, 265, 273
Cap. IV. 10_a_; I. 135 _n._ 1, 136 _n._ 2
10_b_; I. 180 _n._ 1
11_b_; I. 273
11_b-c_; I. 264
11_c_; I. 137 _n._ 1
Cap. V. 12_b_-13_b_; I. 121 _n._ 3
13_c_; I. 401
14_b_; I. 134 _n._ 2
Cap. VI. 14_c_; I. 121 _n._ 3, 393
15_b_; I. 139, 267, 273, 280
15_c_-16_a_; I. 140, 265
16_b_; I. 118 _n._ 2, 139
Cap. VII. 17_b_; I. 140
19_b_; I. 274
Cap. VIII. 20_a_; I. 401
20_b_; I. 142 _n._ 2
20_c_; I. 143
21_a_; I. 407
21_a-b_; I. 401
21_b_; I. 144, 145 _n._ 1
21_c_; I. 143 _n._ 2
22_b_; I. 265
Cap. IX. 22_c_; I. 267, 277
23_a_; I. 139, 279
23_b_; I. 267, 274
23_c_; I. 263, 277
24_a_; I. 277, 279
24_b_; I. 274
Cap. X. 25_c_-26_a_; I. 265
26_b_; I. 266
Cap. XI. 27_a_; I. 280
28_c_-29_b_; I. 269
29_c_; I. 262, 278
30_a_; I. 278
Cap. XII. 30_b_; I. 262
31_b_; I. 271
31_c_-32_a_; I. 268
Cap. XIII. 32_c_; I. 409 _n._ 1
33_c_-33_b_; I. 261
33_b_; I. 283; II. 222
Cap. XIV. 34_c_; I. 277
36_b_; I. 263, 266
36_c_; I. 266
37; I. 259
38_b_-39_a_; I. 282
39_b_; I. 162 _n._ 3
Cap. XV. 39_b_-116_b_; II. 294
Cap. XVI. 42_a_; I. 270
42_b_; I. 269
43_c_; I. 269, 278
Cap. XVII. 47_b_; I. 139, 161, 162
47_c_-48_a_; II. 92
Cap. XVIII. 48_b_; I. 266
49_a_; I. 139, 267
50_a_; I. 161, 162
50_b_; I. 266
Cap. XIX. 51-52; I. 140 _n._ 4, 141 _n._ 1
51_a_-53_b_; I. 390 _n._ 2, 451
51_b_; I. 279
52_a_; I. 279
52_c_-53_a_; I. 272
53_b_; I. 265, 276
Cap. XX. 54_b-c_; I. 272
55_c_-56_a_; I. 262
56_b_, _c_; I. 123, 124 _n._ 1
Cap. XXII. 59_c_; I. 274, 275
Cap. XXIII. 60_c_; I. 280
61_a_; I. 262
61_c_; I. 277
62_a_; I. 259, 387
Cap. XXIV. 64_b_; I. 287
Cap. XXV. 66_a_; I. 268
66_b_; I. 268
67_c_; I. 265
Cap. XXVI. 69_a_; I. 267
Cap. XXVII. 71_c_; I. 198 _n._ 1
72_b_; I. 162, 163. 164
Cap. XXIX. 74_b_; I. 263
75_b_; I. 268
76; I. 387
76_a_; I. 272
76_c_; I. 262, 275
77_a_; I. 275
77_b_; I. 277; II. 50
Cap. XXX. 78_c_; I. 284
Cap. XXXI. 79_c_; I. 262
80_b_; I. 265
80_c_-81_a_; I. 263
81_b-c_; I. 271
82_a_: I. 271
82_b_-83_a_; I. 394-395
83_a_; I. 259
Cap. XXXII. 83_c_-84_a_; I. 270
86_b_; _ibid._
87_a_; _ibid._
87_c_; I. 268, 276; II. 50
Cap. XXXIV. 91_c_; I. 262
92_a_; I. 259
Cap. XXXVI. 94_b_-95_c_; I. 160
94_a_; I. 276
94_b_-95_c_; I. 455
94_c_; I. 159 _n._ 1, 279
95_b_; I. 279
95_c_; I. 127, 272
96_b_; I. 148 _n._ 1
Cap. XXXVII. 97_b_; I. 140, 148 _n._ 1, 160, 161, 409 _n._ 2
97_c_; I. 388
Cap. XXXVIII. 98-99; I. 166, 183 _n._ 1
98_a-b_; I. 183, 454
98_a_-99_b_; I. 454-455
98_c_; I. 192 _n._ 1
99_a_; I. 192 _n._ 1
Cap. XXXIX. 100_c_-101_b_; I. 455
101_a-b_; I. 262
103_b_; I. 271
Cap. XL. 105_c_; I. 147 _n._ 1, 265
Cap. XLI. 106_a_, _c_; I. 268
107_a_; I. 268
107_b_; I. 274
108_b_; I. 270
109_b_; I. 276
Cap. XLII. 113_b_; I. 164 _n._ 2; II. 10
113_c_; I. 274
114_a_; I. 269
Cap. XLIII. 115_a_, _b_; I. 162 _n._ 3, 457
115_c_; I. 457
Cap. XLIV. 116_c_; I. 117 _n._ 2, 118 _n._ 1
116_c_-121_b_; I. 390 _n._ 4, 455-456
117_b_; I. 118 _n._ 1
117_b_-121_b_; I. 451, 455-457
118_a_, _b_; I. 158 _n._ 1
119_b_; I. 185 _n._ 1
119_c_; I. 118, 195 _n._ 1, 391
120_a_, _b_; I. 195 _n._ 1
Cap. XLV. 122_b_, _c_-123_a_; I. 150 _n._ 1
122_c_; I. 272, 388
123, 124; I. 132 _n._ 3
123_b_; I. 167, 402
123_b_-124_b_; I. 390 _n._ 3, 457
124_b_; I. 387
Cap. XLVI. 124_b_-125; I. 169-171
124_c_; I. 388
125_a_; I. 272
125_b_; I. 402 _n._ 2
Cap. XLVII. 127-132; I. 166
127_a_, _c_; I. 420
129_b_; I. 119 _n._ 2
129_c_; I. 164 _n._ 2; II. 4
130_a_; I. 164 _n._ 2
132_a_; I. 188 _n._ 1
Cap. XLVIII. 132_b_; 188 _n._ 1
133_b_; I. 187 _n._ 1, 188, 450
134_a_; I. 164 _n._ 2
135_a_; I. 189 _n._ 1
135_c_-136_a_; I. 189 _n._ 2
136_b_; I. 274
138_b_; II. 10
138_c_; I. 193
Cap. XLIX. 139_a_; I. 388 _n._ 1
139_a_-140_c_; I. 390 _n._ 4
139_c_-140_b_; I. 388 _n._ 1
140_a_; I. 194 _n._ 1
140_b_, _c_; I. 119-120
141_b_-145_b_; I. 204 _n._ 1
142_a_, _b_, _c_; I. 197 _n._ 2, 3
143_b_; I. 197 n, 4; II. 10
144_a_; I. 198 _n._ 2
144_b_; I. 281
144_c_; I. 434
145_c_-146_a_; I. 198 _n._ 3
146_c_-147_c_; I. 201 _n._ 3 (202), 390, 451
Cap. L. 148_c_; I. 204 _n._ 2
149_b_; I. 205 _n._ 1; II. 10
149_c_; I. 205 _n._ 1
151_a_, _b_; I. 205 _n._ 4
152_b_-153_c_; I. 204 _n._ 1
152_c_; II. 10
153_a_; I. 209 _n._ 1
154_b_; I. 208 _n._ 3, 390, 451
155_a_; I. 209 _n._ 1, 273; II. 10
155_b_-156_a_; I. 210 _n._ 1, 389, 412, 452
156_b_, _c_; I. 210 _n._ 1
157_c_; I. 209 _n._ 1
158_a_; I. 209 _n._ 1
158_b_; I. 210 _n._ 3
158_c_-159_a_; I. 211
159_c_; I. 213 _n._ 1
160_a_, _b_; I. 214
160_c_; I. 215
161; I. 387
161_a_; I. 215
Cap. LI. 161_c_-163_a_; I. 216-218
162_a_; I. 162 _n._ 3
Cap. LII. 163_b_-164_a_; I. 218 _n._ 2
164_b_, _c_; I. 300
165_a_; I. 454-455
165_c_; I. 300, 454, 455
_Vita-Trattato_, Cap. I. 169_b_; I. 281
169_b_-175_c_; I. 435
169_b_-184_c_; I. 435-438
169_c_-170_a_; I. 286
169_c_-170_b_; I. 417
169_c_-170_c_; I. 440-442
170_b_; I. 283
Cap. II. 170_c_; I. 287, 291
170_c_-171_b_; I. 442-444
171_b_; I. 287
Cap. III. 171_c_; I. 278
172_a_; I. 278, 288
172_b_; I. 287, 444-445
Cap. IV. 172_c_; I. 282
173_a_; I. 445
173_a_, _b_; I. 283
173_b_; I. 226; II. 222
Cap. V. 173_c_, 174_a_; I. 287, 446-447
Cap. VI. 174_b_; I. 288, 289
Cap. VII. 175_a_; I. 277, 285
175_b_; I. 284
Cap. IX. 176_a_; I. 284, 285
Cap. X. 177_b_; I. 284, 287
Cap. XI. 178_a-b_; I. 438-439
178_b_; I. 292, 293
Cap. XIII. 180_a_-181_c_; I. 437
180_b_-181_c_; I. 438-439
Cap. XVI. 181_c_, 182_b_; I. 438-439
182_b_; I. 286, 290
Cap. XVII. 183_c_; I. 274
_Vita-Dialogo_, Part I. 185-225; I. 396-397
185_c_-190_c_, 191_a_-198_a_; I. 397 _n._ 1
Cap. VI. 197_a_; I. 400
198_b_-206_b_; I. 398 _n._ 1
Cap. VIII. 199_c_-202_c_; I. 404
201_b_; I. 409 _n._ 2
202_c_-208_b_; I. 404-406
203_a_; I. 124
Cap. XI. 208_c_-209_b_; I. 404, 405
Cap. XII. 209_c_-211_b_; I. 409 _n._ 1
207_c_-212_a_; I. 398 _n._ 4
211_a_; I. 404-406, 409 _n._ 2
211_b_; I. 400, 404-406, 409 _n._ 1, 412
211_c_; I. 409 _n._ 1
Cap. XIII. 212_b_, _c_; I. 398 _n._ 5
212_c_; I. 146, 429
212_c_-213_a_; I. 406-407
Cap. XIV. 213_c_-225_c_; I. 398 _n._ 6, 420-421
Cap. XV. 215_c_-216_a_; I. 399 _n._ 2, 408 _n._ 5
Cap. XVIII. 220_c_; I. 401, 406-407
221_b_; I. 431
Cap. XIX. 221_c_; 400, 406-407
221, 222_a_; I. 402
222_b_; I. 406-407
Cap. XX. 222_c_; I. 401
223_c_; I. 400
Part II. 226_b_-242_b_; I. 419
226_c_-241_b_; I. 420
227_a_-241_b_; I. 420-421
Cap. III. 231_a_; I. 430
232_b_-245_c_; I. 419
232_b_; I. 431
Cap. V. 234_b_: I. 427
Cap. IX. 241_b_; I. 427-428
241_c_-245_c_; I. 491
Cap. X. 242_b_; I. 430, 431
Cap. XI. 245_c_; I. 417
Part III. Cap. I. 247_b_; I. 432
248_c_; I. 430, 432
249_a_; I. 430
Cap. II. 250_a_, _b_; I. 160, 161
250_a_-263_c_; I. 422
250_b_; I. 430
Cap. VI. 259_c_; I. 432
260_b_; I. 428
264_a_-271_a_; I. 423
Cap. VIII. 264_b_; I. 412, 433
Cap. IX. 266_a_, _c_; I. 425, 426
266_b_; I. 432
Cap. X. 268_c_; I. 428
Cap. XI. 269_c_; I. 428
270_b_; I. 428
C. XII. XIII. 271_b_-275_a_; I. 424
Cap. XIII. 273_a_; I. 429
275_a_; I. 429
_Vita-Brevi Notizie_ (Maineri), _Traslazione_, 278-282;
I. 306 _n._ 1
278_b_, _c_; I. 304
_Miracoli_, 282_b_; I. 302
_Vita Venerabilis Lukardis_, in “Analecta Bollandiana,” XVIII.
1899; II. 52-55
Volkelt, J., Prof., _Erfahrung u. Denken_, 1886; II. 280
_Kant’s Erkenntnisstheorie_, 1879; I. 56 _n._ 1; II. 276-278
_Schopenhauer_, 1900; II. 370, 371
Ward, James, Prof., _Naturalism and Agnosticism_, ed. 1905;
II. 196 _n._ 1
“Mechanism and Morals,” _Hibbert Journal_, Oct. 1905;
II. 197 _n._ 1
“On the Definition of Psychology,” _Journal of Psych._, Vol. I.,
1904; II. 280
“Present Problems of Psychology,” (American) _Philosophical Review_,
1904; II. 277-278
Weinel, Prof. H., _Die Wirkungen des Geistes u. der Geister_, 1899, 309;
II. 43 _n._ 1
Wesley, John, _Journal_, ed. Parker, 1903; II. 4 _n._ 4
Windelband, Prof. W., “Das Heilige,” in _Präludien_, 1903; II. 262
Zeller, Prof. Edward, _Philosophie der Griechen_, Part II. ed. 1879;
I. 312
Part III., Div. 2, ed. 1881; II. 313
FOOTNOTES
[1] _Vita_, pp. 143_b_; 149_b_, 159_b_; 153_a_.
[2] _Ibid._ p. 153_c_.
[3] _Ibid._ pp. 129_c_, 134_a_.
[4] I have already traced the steps in the growth of this legend. It
is no doubt this element in the biography which irritated John Wesley,
the man of absolute judgments; although he himself, with shrewd good
sense, indicates its possible secondary origin. “I am sure this was a
fool of a Saint; that is, if it was not the folly of her historian, who
has aggrandized her into a mere idiot” (_Journal_, ed. P. L. Parker,
London, 1903).
[5] _Vita_, pp. 127_c_, 143_b_, 144_b_.
[6] _Life_, tr. by D. Lewis, London, ed. 1888, pp. 27, 420.
[7] _Existence de Dieu_, I, 1, 31: _Œuvres_, ed. Versailles, 1820, Vol.
I, p. 51.
[8] Pierre Janet, _Automatisme Psychologique_, ed. 1903; _Etat Mental
des Hysteriques_, 2 vols., 1892, 1893. Hermann Gunkel, _Die Wirkungen
des heiligen Geistes_, Göttingen, 1899. Heinrich Weinel, _Die Wirkungen
des Geistes und der Geister_, Freiburg, 1899. William James, _The
Varieties of Religious Experience_, London, 1902.
[9] Pierre Janet, _op. cit._ Alfred Binet, _Les Altérations de la
Personnalité_, Paris, 1902. M. Th. Coconnier, _L’Hypnotisme Franc_,
Paris, 1897.
[10] W. James, _op. cit._, especially pp. 1-25. H. Weinel, _op.
cit._, especially pp. 128-137; 161-208. Bernouilli, _Die Heiligen der
Merowinger_, Tübingen, 1900, pp. 2-6. B. Duhm, _Das Geheimniss in der
Religion_, Tübingen, 1896.
[11] H. Bergson, _Essai sur les Données Immédiates de la Conscience_,
ed. 1898. H. Jones, _The Philosophy of Lotze_, 1895. J. Ward,
_Naturalism and Agnosticism_, 2 vols., 1899. M. Blondel, _l’Action_,
1893. J. Volkelt, _Kant’s Erkenntnisstheorie_, 1879; _Erfahrung und
Denken_, 1886. H. Münsterberg, _Psychology and Life_, 1899. D. Mercier
_Critériologie Générale_, ed. 1900.
[12] _Vita_, pp. 96_c_; 117_b_; 127_a_; 97_c_, 133_b_ (dated November
11, 1509, in MSS.); 146_b_; 148_a_.
[13] From my authenticated copies of the original wills in the Archivio
di Stato, Genoa.
[14] _Vita_, pp. 113_b_, 149_c_; 143_b_, 152_c_; 138_b_, 155_a_. Note
the parallels in St. Teresa’s _Life_, written by herself, tr. D.
Lewis, ed. 1888. P. 234: “When these (spiritual) impetuosities are
not very violent, the soul seeks relief through certain penances; the
painfulness of which, and even the shedding of blood, are no more felt
than if the body were dead.” P. 30: “I was unable to move either arm or
foot, or hand or head, unless others moved me. I could move, however,
I think, one finger of my right hand.” P. 31: “I was paralytic, though
getting better, for about three years.”
[15] Hyper-aesthesia and sensation of heat: _Vita_, pp. 142_a_, 153_a_.
Increase of movement: _ibid._, and pp. 145_b_, 143_a_, 153_c_, 141_a_.
Loss of speech and sight: pp. 141_b_, 141_c_, 159_c_. Localization of
heat: p. 157_b_. Haemorrhages: 138_c_, 159_c_, 160_a_. Concavities
and jaundice: pp. 144_a_, 153_a_. Spasms: pp. 143_c_, 71_c_, 141_c_,
142_b_. Cf. St. Teresa, _loc. cit._ p. 30: “As to touching me, that was
impossible, for I was so bruised that I could not endure it. They used
to move me in a sheet, one holding one end, and another the other.” P.
31: “I began to crawl on my hands and feet.” P. 263: “I felt myself on
fire: this inward fire and despair.…” P. 17: “The fainting fits began
to be more frequent; and my heart was so seriously affected, that those
who saw it were alarmed.” P. 27: “It seemed to me as if my heart had
been seized by sharp teeth.” P. 235: “I saw, in the Angel’s hand, a
long spear of gold, and at the iron’s point there seemed to be a little
fire. He appeared to me to be thrusting it at times into my heart, and
to pierce my very entrails.… The pain is not bodily, but spiritual.”
[16] Swallow: _Vita_, pp. 149_c_, 150_a_; 159_b_; 159_c_; 150_a_.
Odours and colours: 153_c_, 154_b_. Cf. St. Teresa, _loc. cit._ p. 27:
“I could eat nothing whatever, only drink. I had a great loathing for
food.” P. 43: “I have been suffering for twenty years from sickness
every morning.” P. 30: “There was a choking in my throat … I could
not swallow even a drop of water.” P. 263: “A sense of oppression, of
stifling.”
[17] Exclamations: _Vita_, pp. 144_a_, 148_b_, 155_a_. Laughter:
_ibid._ 145_c_, 148_b_, 149_b_, 157_c_. Sudden changes of condition:
135_b_, 138_c_, 159_b_. Cf. St. Teresa, _loc. cit._ pp. 28, 29: “That
very night,” Feast of the Assumption, 1537, “my sickness became so
acute that, for about four days, I remained insensible. For a day and a
half the grave was open, waiting for my body. But it pleased Our Lord I
should come to myself. I wished to go to confession at once. Though my
sufferings were unendurable, and my perceptions dull, yet my confession
was, I believe, complete. I communicated with many tears.”
[18] _Vita_, pp. 71_c_; 145_c_; 147_b_; 159_c_, 159_a_; 127_a_. Cf.
St. Teresa, _loc. cit._ p. 23: “I was in my sister’s house, for the
purpose of undergoing medical treatment--they took the utmost care of
my comfort.” P. 27: “In two months, so strong were the medicines, my
life was nearly worn out.” “The physicians gave me up: they said I was
consumptive.”
[19] Self-knowledge as to “quietudes”: _Vita_, pp. 153_b_, 157_a_.
Marabotto’s attitude: 139_b_; 141_c_, 143_c_, 149_a_. Relations with
Boerio: 147_c_, 147_b_. Cf. St. Teresa, _loc. cit._ p. 86: “My health
has been much better since I have ceased to look after my ease and
comforts.”
[20] Remark to Vernazza: _Vita_, pp. 98_c_, 99_a_. Persistence of
intelligence: 141_c_; 159_b_, _c_; 143_a_; 143_c_; 145_b_. Cf. St.
Teresa, _loc. cit._ p. 408: “She” (Teresa herself) “never saw anything
with her bodily eyes, nor heard anything with her bodily ears.” P.
189: “The words of the divine locutions are very distinctly formed;
but by the bodily ear they are not heard.” P. 191: “In ecstasy, the
memory can hardly do anything at all, and the imagination is, as it
were, suspended.” P. 142: “You see and feel yourself carried away, you
know not whither.” P. 187: “I fell into a trance; I was carried out of
myself. It was most plain.”
[21] Picture: _Vita_, p. 135_a_;. Red and black robes: 154_b_, 156_c_.
Suggestions of odour: 118_c_, 119_a_; 9_c_, 8_a_, 9_b_. Cf. St. Teresa,
_loc. cit_. pp. 57, 58: “One day, I saw a picture of Christ most
grievously wounded: the very sight of it moved me.” P. 247: “I used to
pray much to Our Lord for that living water of which He spoke to the
Samaritan woman: I had always a picture of it with this inscription:
‘Domine, da mihi aquam.’” P. 231: “Once when I was holding in my
hand the cross of my rosary, He took it from me into His own hand.
He returned it; but it was then four large stones incomparably more
precious than diamonds: the five wounds were delineated on them with
the most admirable art. He said to me that for the future that cross
would appear so to me always, and so it did. The precious stones were
seen, however, only by myself.”
[22] Synchronisms: _Vita_, pp. 148_b_; 150_b_; 152_a_, 160_c_, 161_b_.
Communion and ordinary food: 154_a_, 154_c_, 138_c_; 154_c_. Heats:
“Assalto,” _e.g._ 138_b_, _c_; 143_a_, _c_; “ferita” and “saetta,”
_e.g._ 141_a_, _c_; 145_a_. Their localization: 135_a_, 141_c_; 153_a_;
142_a_, 158_a_. Their psycho-physical character: 135_b_, 144_b_. Thirst
and its suggestion: 149_c_, 159_c_; 76_c_; 152_b_, 135_a_. Paralyses:
134_b_; 149_c_. Cf. St. Teresa, _op. cit._ p. 28: her death-swoon
occurs on evening of the Assumption. P. 235: Heat, piercing of the
heart as by a spear, and a spiritual (not bodily) pain, are all united
in the experience of the heart-piercing Angel. P. 423: “Another prayer
very common is a certain kind of wounding; for it really seems to the
soul as if an arrow were thrust through the heart or through itself.
The suffering is not one of sense, nor is the wound physical; it is in
the interior of the soul.”
[23] _Vita_, pp. 158_a_; 160_a_. Cf. St. Teresa, _op. cit._ p. 41: “We
saw something like a great toad crawling towards us.… The impression
it made on me was such, that I think it must have had a meaning.”
Contrast, with this naïvely sensible sight and the absence of all
interior assurance, such a spiritual vision as “Christ stood before me,
stern and grave. I saw Him with the eyes of the soul. The impression
remained with me that the vision was from God, and not an imagination”
(pp. 40, 41). Another quasi-sensible sight, with no interior assurance,
or question as to its provenance and value, is given on pp. 248, 249:
“Once Satan, in an abominable shape, appeared on my left hand. I looked
at his mouth in particular, because he spoke, and it was horrible. A
huge flame seemed to issue out of his body, perfectly bright without
any shadow.” Another such impression is recorded on p. 252: “I thought
the evil spirits would have suffocated me one night.… I saw a great
troop of them rush away as if tumbling over a precipice.”
[24] _Lives of the Saints_, ed. 1898, Vol. X, September 15.
[25] Pierre Janet, _Etat Mental des Hysteriques_, 2 vols., Paris, 1892,
1894: Vol. II, pp. 260, 261; 280; Vol. I, pp. 225, 63.
[26] _Ibid._ Vol. I, pp. 63, 225, 226.
[27] Pierre Janet, _Etat Mental_, Vol. I, pp. 226, 227.
[28] _Ibid._ Vol. II, pp. 253, 257.
[29] Pierre Janet, _Etat Mental_, Vol. I, pp. 7, 8, 11, 12, 57, 21.
[30] _Ibid._ Vol. II, pp. 82, 91; 70, 71.
[31] _Ibid._ Vol. II. Troubles of movement, pp. 105, 106; of nutrition,
pp. 285, 70, 71; strangulation, heart palpitation, fever heats, p. 282;
haemorrhages and red patches, p. 283; jaundice (_ictère emotionnel_),
p. 287; and note the “ischurie,” p. 283, top, compared with _Vita_, p.
12_a_.
[32] Pierre Janet, _Etat Mental_, Vol I, p. 140; Vol. II, pp. 14, 72,
165.
[33] _Ibid._ Vol. I, pp. 218, 219; 158, 159.
[34] The biographical chapters of Volume I give all the facts and
references alluded to in this paragraph. It would be easy to find
parallels for most of these peripheral disturbances and great central
normalities in St. Teresa’s life.
[35] Prof. W. James has got some very sensible considerations on the
pace of a conversion (as distinct from its spiritual significance,
depth, persistence, and fruitfulness) being primarily a matter of
temperament: _Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, pp. 227-240.
[36] By the term “visionless,” I do not mean to affirm anything as to
the presence or absence of ideas or mental images during the times so
described, but to register the simple fact, that, for her own memory
after the event, she was, at the time, without any one persistent,
external-seeming image.--Note how St. Ignatius Loyola in his
_Testament_, ed. London, 1900, pp. 91, 92, considered the profoundest
spiritual experience of his life to have been one unaccompanied or
expressed by any vision: “On his way” to a Church near Manresa, “he sat
down facing the stream, which was running deep. While he was sitting
there, the eyes of his mind were opened,” not so as to see any kind of
vision, but “so as to understand and comprehend spiritual things … with
such clearness that for him all these things were made new. If all the
enlightenment and help he had received from God in the whole course of
his life … were gathered together in one heap, these all would appear
less than he had been given at this one time.”
[37] I would draw the reader’s attention to the very interesting
parallels to many of the above-mentioned peculiarities furnished both
by St. Teresa in her _Life_, _passim_, and by Battista Vernazza in the
Autobiographical statements which I have given here in Chapter VIII.
[38] The omnipresence of neural conditions and consequences for all and
every mental and volitional activity has been admirably brought out by
Prof. W. James, in his _Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, Vol.
I, pp. 1-25.
[39] H. Weinel’s _Die Wirkungen des Geistes und der Geister im
nachapostolischen Zeitalter, bis auf Irenäus_, 1899, contains an
admirably careful investigation of these things.
[40] _Life_, written by herself, ed. cit. pp. 235, 423; 136.
[41] _Ibid._ pp. 149, 420.
[42] _Ibid._ pp. xxii, 28.
[43] It is to Dr. Lightfoot’s fine _Excursus in St. Paul’s Epistle to
the Galatians_, ed. 1881, pp. 186-191, that I owe all the Pauline texts
and most of the considerations reproduced above.
[44] Visions of Jahve’s glory: i, 1-28; iii, 22-27 xl, 1; xliv, 4. The
five other Ecstasies and Visions: viii, 1 foll.; xi, 1 foll.; xxiv,
1 foll.; xxxiii, 22; xxxvii, 1 foll. Second Sight: viii, 16; xi, 13;
xxiv, 1. Representative Actions: iv, 1-3, 7; iv, 4-6, 8; iv, 10; ix,
11-15; xii, 1-16; xii, 17-20; xxi, 11, 12; xxi, 23-32; xxiv, 1-14;
xxiv, 15-27; xxxiii, 22; xxxvii, 15-28.
[45] The above translation and interpretation is based upon
Krätzschmar’s admirably psychological commentary, _Das Buch Ezechiel_,
Göttingen, 1900, pp. v, vi; 45, 49. But I think he is wrong in taking
that six months’ abnormal condition to have given rise, in Ezekiel’s
mind, to a belief in a previous divine order and to an interpretation
of this order. All the strictly analogical cases of religious ecstasy,
not hysteria, point to a strong mental impression, such as that order
and belief having preceded and occasioned the peculiar psycho-physical
state.
[46] _Op. cit._ pp. 190_c_; 192_c_, 193_a_.
[47] See Prof. W. James’s admirable account of these irruptions in his
_Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, pp. 231-237.
[48] _Life_, written by Herself, pp. 190_b_; 196_b_; 224_c_; 295_c_;
413_b_.
[49] _Vita_, passim; _Life_, ed. cit. pp. 40, 41; 408; 206. _Vita_, pp.
87_c_, 77_b_.
[50] _Ascent of Mount Carmel_, ed. cit. pp. 159, 163; 264, 265, 102,
195; _Spiritual Canticle_, ed. cit. p. 238; _Ascent_, pp. 26, 27;
_Canticle_, pp. 206, 207.
[51] Two Confessors of hers are mentioned by her, _Vita_, p. 352:
Fathers Henry of Mühlhausen, and Eberhard of the Friars Preachers.
[52] _Analecta_, _loc. cit._ p. 310.
[53] _Analecta_, pp. 311-313.
[54] _Analecta_, pp. 314, 315.
[55] _Vita_, _loc. cit._ pp. 317, 319.
[56] _Vita_, pp. 319, 320.
[57] _Ibid._, _loc. cit._ pp. 327, 334, 352.
[58] _The Life of Father Hecker_, by the Rev. Walter Elliott, New York,
1894, pp. 371, 372, 418.
[59] Robert Browning, in _Rabbi Ben Ezra_, viii; Matthew Arnold, in
_Culture and Anarchy_, 21; Prof. James Seth, in _A Study of Ethical
Principles_, 1894, pp. 260-262; and Prof. Percy Gardner, in _Oxford at
the Cross Roads_, 1903, pp. 12-14, have all admirably insisted upon
this most important point.
[60] I owe much clearness of conception as to the function of
auto-suggestion and mono-ideism to the very remarkable paper of Prof.
Emil Boutroux, “La Psychologie du Mysticisme,” in the _Bulletin de
l’Institut Psychologique International_, Paris, 1902, pp. 9-26: Engl.
tr. in the _International Journal of Ethics_, Philadelphia, Jan. 1908.
There are also many most useful facts and reflections in Prof. Henri
Joly’s _Psychology of the Saints_, Engl. tr., 1898, pp. 64-117.
[61] In Chapter XII, § iv, I shall show reason for strongly suspecting
that Catherine possessed some knowledge, probably derived from
an intermediate Christian source, of certain passages in Plato’s
Dialogues. But the influence of these passages can, in any case, only
be traced in her Purgatorial doctrine, and had better be discussed
together with this doctrine itself.
[62] My chief obligations are here to Prof. H. J. Holtzmann’s _Lehrbuch
der Neutestamentlichen Theologie_, 1897, Vol. II, pp. 1-225: “Der
Paulinismus”; but I have also learnt from Estius and Dr. Lightfoot, and
from my own direct studies in St. Paul, Philo, and Plato.
[63] _Symposium_, 216_e_.
[64] 1 Cor. xv, 35-53.
[65] E. Grafe, “Verhältniss der paulinischen Schriften zur Sapientia
Salomonis,” in _Theol. Abhandlungen Carl von Weizsäcker Gewidmet_,
1892, pp. 274-276.
[66] “The love of Christ,” Rom. viii, 35, is identical with “the love
of God which is in Christ Jesus,” Rom. viii, 39. “The Spirit of God
dwelleth in you,” Rom. viii, 9; 1 Cor. iii, 16. “I live, not I: but
Christ dwelleth in me,” Gal. ii, 20.
[67] H. J. Holtzmann, _op. cit._ Vol. II, p. 145.
[68] Holtzmann, _op. cit._ Vol. II, pp. 151, 152.
[69] My chief obligations are here again to Dr. H. J. Holtzmann’s
_Neutestamentliche Theologie_, 1897, Vol. II, pp. 354-390; 394-396;
399-401; 426-430; 447-466; 466-521.
[70] I am much indebted to the thorough and convincing monograph of
the Catholic Priest and Professor Dr. Hugo Koch, _Pseudo-Dionysius
Areopagita in seinen Beziehungen sum Neo-Platonismus und
Mysterienwesen_, Mainz, 1900, for a fuller understanding of the
relations between Dionysius, Proclus, and Plotinus. I have also
found much help in H. F. Müller’s admirable German translation of
Plotinus, a translation greatly superior to Thomas Taylor’s English
or to Bouillet’s French translation. And I have greatly benefited by
the admirable study of Plotinus in Dr. Edward Caird’s _Evolution of
Theology in the Greek Philosophers_, 1904, Vol. II, pp. 210-346.
[71] _The Divine Names_, iii, I; ix, 4: English translation by Parker,
1897, pp. 49, 50; 106.
[72] _Institutio Theologica_, c. 35; c. 31.
[73] _Enneads_, vi, ch. ix, 9.
[74] _Divine Names_, iii, 1; ix, 4: Parker, pp. 27, 104.
[75] _Enneads_, vi, ch. ix, 4.
[76] _Divine Names_, viii, 7: Parker, pp. 98, 99.
[77] _Vita_, pp. 47_c_, 48_a_.
[78] _Divine Names_, iii, 1: Parker, pp. 27, 28.
[79] _In Platonis Alcibiadem_, ii, 78 _seq._
[80] _Divine Names_, iv, 1; iv, 5: Parker, pp. 32, 33; 38.
[81] _In Parmenidem_, iv, 34. _In Cratylum_, pp. 103; 107.
[82] _Republic_, VI, 508_c_. _Theaetetus_, 153_c_.
[83] _Heavenly Hierarchy_, xv, 2: Parker, pp. 56, 57.
[84] _Divine Names_, xi, 1; iv, 2: Parker, pp. 113, 34. _Ad Magnesios_,
viii, 2.
[85] _Mystic Theology_, iii: Parker, p. 135.
[86] _Platonic Theology_, III, p. 132.
[87] _Enneads_, v, ch. v, 8; vi, ch. ix, 11.
[88] _Divine Names_, iv, 8-10: Parker, pp. 42-45. _In Parmenidem_, vi,
52 (see Koch, p. 152).
[89] _Divine Names_, i, 1; vii, 3; vii, 1; Mystic Theology, 1; _Divine
Names_, vii, 3: Parker, pp. 2; 91, 92; 87; 130; 91, 92.
[90] _Divine Names_, iv, 13: Parker, p. 48.
[91] _Enneads_ vi, ch. ix, 9.
[92] _Ibid._ vi, ch. ix, 8; ch. vi, 11.
[93] Parker, p. 142.
[94] _Enneads_, vi, ch. vii, 36; v, ch. iii, 17; v, ch. v, 7.
[95] _Symposium_, 210 E. See the admirable elucidations in Rhode’s
_Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. I, p. 298; Vol. II, pp. 279; 283, 284.
[96] _Divine Names_, i, 5: Parker, p. 8.
[97] _Divine Names_, iv, 6; _Mystic Theology_, i, iii: Parker, pp. 39,
132.
[98] _In Alcibiadem_, ii, 302.
[99] _Mystic Theology_, iv, v; _Divine Names_ i, 1: Parker, pp. 136,
137; 1; _In Alcibiadem_, ii, 302.
[100] _Heavenly Hierarchy_, ch. xv, s. 3: Parker, p. 60.
[101] _In Alcibiadem_, iii, 75.
[102] _Divine Names_, iii, 1: Parker, pp. 27, 28. _In Parmenidem_, iv,
68.
[103] _Divine Names_, i, 5; _Ecclesiastical Hierarchy_, i, 2; _Divine
Names_, ix, 5: Parker, pp. 8, 69, 104.
[104] _Institutio Theologica_, c. 129.
[105] _Ecclesiastical Hierarchy_, iii, 3, 7: Parker, p. 97.
[106] _Divine Names_, i, 6; viii, 3; 5: Parker, pp. 10, 95, 96.
[107] _In Parmenidem_, iv, 34; v.
[108] _Divine Names_ viii, 2; iv, 4; iv, 20: Parker, pp. 95, 84, 57.
[109] _Laude de lo contemplativo et extatico B. F. Jacopone de lo
Ordine de lo Seraphico S. Francesco.…_ In Firenze, per Ser Francesco
Bonaccorsi, MCCCCLXXXX. Only the sheets are numbered; and two Lode
have, by mistake, been both numbered LVIII: I have indicated them by
LVIII_a_ and LVIII_b_ respectively. I have much felt the absence of any
monograph on the sources and character of Jacopone’s doctrine.
[110] _Enneads_, vi, ch. ix, II.
[111] _Rabbi Ben Ezra_, XXXI.
[112] E. Caird, “St. Paul and the Idea of Evolution,” _Hibbert
Journal_, Vol. II, 1904, pp. 1-19. W. Dilthey has shown this by
implication, in his studies of Erasmus, Luther, and Zwingli: _Archiv
für Geschichte der Philosophie_, Vol. V, 1892, especially, pp. 381-385.
[113] Mark i, 13, and parallels; Matt. xix, 10-12.
[114] Mark vi, 8; Matt. x, 26-38; viii, 19-22; xiii, 30-32; xxxiv, 42,
and parallels.
[115] Matt. vii, 13, 14; xviii, 1-5; xvi, 24-28.
[116] Mark xiv, 38, and parallels.
[117] Rom. vii, 24, 18.
[118] 2 Cor. v, 1-4 = Wisd. of Sol. ix, 15.
[119] See Erwin Rhode’s _Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. II, p. 101, n. 2.
[120] I owe much help towards acquiring this very important conception,
and all the above similes, to Prof. Ernst Troeltsch’s admirable
exposition in his “Grundprobleme der Ethik,” _Zeitschrift f. Theologie
und Kirche_, 1902, pp. 163-178.
[121] _St. Augustine_, ed. Ben., Vol. X, 590_b_, 613_a_, 1973_c_, etc.
St. Thomas, _Summa Theol._, suppl., qu. 62, art. 2.
[122] My chief authorities throughout this section have been Bossuet’s
_Instruction sur les Etats d’Oraison_ of 1687, with the important
documents prefixed and appended to it (_Œuvres de Bossuet_, ed.
Versailles, 1817, Vol. XXVII); Fénelon’s chief apologetic works,
especially his _Instruction Pastorale_, his _Letteres en Réponse à
Divers Ecrits ou Mémoires_, his _Lettre sur l’Etat Passif_, and his two
Latin Letters to Pope Clement XI (_Œuvres de Fénelon_, ed. Versailles,
1820, Vols. IV, VI, VIII, and IX); and Abbé Gosselin’s admirably clear,
impartial, cautious, and authoritative _Analyse de la Controverse du
Quiétisme_. I have studied these works, and the condemned propositions
of the Beguards, of Molinos, and of Fénelon, very carefully, and
believe myself to have, in my text, taken up a position identical with
M. Gosselin’s.
[123] F. C. S. Schiller, Essay “Activity and Substance,” pp.
204-227,--an admirably thorough piece of work, in _Humanism_, 1903. See
his p. 208.
[124] See Heinrich Heppe, _Geschichte der Quietistischen Mystik_,
Berlin, 1875, p. 521. The obviously strong partisan bias of the author
against Rome,--of which more lower down,--does not destroy the great
value of the large collection of now, in many cases, most rare and
inaccessible documents given, often _in extenso_, in this interesting
book.
[125] Heppe, _op. cit._ pp. 130-133.
[126] There is a good article on Petrucci in the Catholic Freiburg
_Kirchenlexikon_, 2nd ed., 1895; and Heppe, in his _Geschichte_,
pp. 135-144, gives extracts from his chief book. Bossuet’s attack,
_Œuvres_, ed. 1817, Vol. XXIX.
[127] Reusch, _Der Index der verbotenen Bücher_, 1885, Vol. II, pp.
611; 622, 623; 625.
[128] Gosselin’s _Analyse, Œuvres de Fénelon_, ed. cit. Vol. IV, pp.
xci-xcv.
[129] Fénelon, _Explication … des Propositions de Molinos_ (_Œuvres_,
Vol. IV, pp. 25-86). Gosselin, _Analyse_ (_ibid._ pp. ccxvi-ccxxiii).
[130] _Œuvres de Fénelon_, Vol. VIII, pp. 6, 7.
[131] Heppe, _op. cit._ p. 62. Reusch, _op. cit._ Vol. II, pp. 619, 620.
[132] I write with these approbations before me, as reprinted in the
_Recueil de Diverses Pièces concernant le Quiétisme_, Amsterdam, 1688.
[133] _Œuvres de Bossuet_, ed. 1817, Vol. XXVII, pp. 497-502. Heppe,
_op. cit._ pp. 27_g_ n.; 273-281. Denzinger, _Encheiridion_, ed. 1888,
pp. 266-274.
[134] Reusch, _op. cit._ Vol. II, p. 618 _n._ 1.
[135] See Heppe, p. 264, n.
[136] _Recueil de Diverses Pièces_, pp. 61, 62.
[137] _Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, pp. 209, 211.
[138] _De Beatitudine_, c. 3, 3.
[139] I have been much helped in my own direct studies of the sources
by W. Bousset’s _Die Religion des Judenthums im Neutestamentlichen
Zeitalter_, 1903; by H. J. Holtzmann’s _Neutestamentliche Theologie_,
1897; and A. Jülicher’s _Gleichnissreden Jesu_, Theil 2, 1899.
[140] Bousset, pp. 395, 396.
[141] Ch. xii, 8, 9; see too ch. ii, 2, 7.
[142] Pirke Aboth, v, 23.
[143] Matt. v, 12; vi, 4, 6, 18, 20; Mark x, 21; ix, 41; Luke x, 7.
[144] Matt. v, 7; vi, 14; xviii, 32.
[145] Matt. v, 5; Luke xiv, 8-11; Matt. x, 39.
[146] Matt. v, 8.
[147] Matt. x, 41, 42.
[148] Matt. xix, 29; Mark x, 23; Luke vi, 38; Matt, xxii, 12; xxv, 21;
xxiv, 47; Luke xii, 37.
[149] Interesting reasons and parallels for holding the Wedding Garment
to have been the gift of the King, in Bugge’s _Die Haupt-Parabeln
Jesu_, 1900, pp. 316, 317.
[150] Jülicher, _op. cit._ p. 467. Bugge, _op. cit._ p. 277.
[151] Matt. vi, 1, 2, 5, 16.
[152] Matt. vi, 11; xx, 14; Luke xvii, 10; Matt. vi, 33; v, 48, 44, 45;
Luke vii, 47. It seems plain that the Parable of the Two Debtors, which
appears in this last passage, declares how pardon awakens love; and
that the sinful woman’s act and Our Lord’s direct comment on it, which
are now made to serve as that Parable’s frame, demonstrate how love
produces pardon. In my text I have been busy only with the second of
these twin truths.
[153] Luke vi, 33, 34.
[154] Rom. ii, 6; 2 Cor. v, 10.
[155] 1 Cor. xv, 19, 32.
[156] Gal. iii, 19; 2 Cor. iv, 16; xii, 9; Rom. viii, 31, 35, 37-39;
xiv, 8.
[157] Ps. lxxiii (lxii), v. 25. I follow Duhm’s restoration of the text.
[158] 1 Cor. xiii, 13; 8, 7.
[159] _Œuvres_, ed. Versailles, 1820, Vols. IV to IX.
[160] _Réponse: Œuvres_, Vol. IV, pp. 119-132; _Instruction: ibid._ pp.
181-308: _Lettre sur l’Oraison_, Vol. VIII, pp. 3-82; _Lettre sur la
Charité_, Vol IX, pp. 3-56; _Epistola II, ibid._ pp. 617-677.
[161] _The Spiritual Letters of Fénelon_, London, 1892, Vol. I, pp. xi,
xii.
[162] _Œuvres de Fénelon_, ed. 1820, Vol. IV, pp. lxxix-ccxxxiv.
[163] _Summa Theologica_, II, ii, qu. 17, art. 8, in corp.
[164] Comment in II, ii, qu. 23, art. 1.
[165] _Summa_, II, ii, qu. 23, art. 6, concl., et in corp.; I, ii, qu.
28, art. 1, in corp., et ad 2. See also II, ii, qu. 17, art. 6, in
corp.; qu. 28, art. 1 ad 3; I, ii, qu. 28, art. 1, in corp., et ad 2.
[166] In Libr. sent. II, dist. 30, qu. 1 ad 2.
[167] _Summa Theol._, III, qu. 85, art. 2 ad 1; I, ii, qu. 114, art. 4,
in corp. In Libr. sent. III, dist. 30, art. 5.
[168] Some of the finest descriptions of these profoundly organized
states common, in some degrees and forms, to all mankind, are to be
found in the tenth and eleventh books of St. Augustine’s _Confessions_,
A.D. 397, and in Henri Bergson’s _Essai sur les Données Immédiates de
la Conscience_, 1898.
[169] _Stromata_, Book IV, ch. vi, 30, 1; ch. iv, 15, 6.
[170] Proemium in _Reg. Fus. Tract._ n. 3, Vol. II, pp. 329, 330.
[171] _Summa Theol._, II, ii, qu. 27, art. 3.
[172] The obligation for all of acts of Pure Love is clearly taught
by the condemnations, passed by Popes Alexander VII and Innocent XI,
upon the opposite contention, in 1665 and 1679: “Homo nullo unquam
vitae suae tempore tenetur elicere actum Fidei, Spei et Charitatis,
ex vi praeceptorum divinorum ad eas virtutes pertinentium.” Note here
how “Charitas” necessarily means Pure Love, since Imperfect Love has
already been mentioned in “Spes.”--“Probabile est, ne singulis quidem
rigorose quinquenniis per se obligare praeceptum charitatis erga Deum.
Tune solum obligat, quando tenemur justificari et non habemus aliam
viam qua justificari possumus.” Here Pure Love is undoubtedly meant
by “Charitas,” since, outside of the use of the sacraments, Pure Love
alone justifies.
[173] _The Problem of Conduct_, 1901, p. 329, n.
[174] _Life, written by Herself_, ch. XXII, tr. by David Lewis, ed.
1888, pp. 162-174.
[175] Deharbe, _op. cit._ pp. 139-179, has an admirable exposition and
proof of this point, backed up by conclusive experiences and analyses
of Saints and Schoolmen.
[176] See Deharbe’s excellent remarks, _op. cit._ pp. 109, 110, n.
[177] _Analyse_, _loc. cit._ pp. cxxii, cxxiii, _Lettre sur l’Oraison
Passive_, _Œuvres_, Vol. VIII, p. 47.
[178] _Analyse_, p. cxxiii.
[179] _Lettre sur l’Oraison Passive_, _Œuvres_, Vol. VIII, pp. 10; 18,
11, 12; 14, 15; 74.
[180] _Tractatus Theologico-Politicus_, c. iv, opening of par. 4,
ed. Van Vloten et Land, 1895, Vol. II, p. 4; _ibid._ middle of par.
3, p. 3; _Ethica_, p. v, prop. xli, _ibid._ Vol. I, p. 264; _ibid._
_Scholion_, p. 265; _ibid._ prop. xix, p. 251; _ibid._ prop. xx, p.
251; _ibid._ prop. xlii, p. 265; _ibid._ prop. xxxvi, p. 261.
[181] _Die Philosophischen Schriften von Leibniz_, ed. Gebhardt, Vol.
VI, 1885, pp. 605, 606; and quotation in Gosselin’s _Analyse, Œuvres de
Fénelon_, 1820, Vol. IV, pp. clxxviii, clxxvii.
[182] It is to Schweizer’s admirable monograph, _Die
Religions-Philosophie Kant’s_, 1899, pp. 4-70, that I owe my clear
apprehension of this very interesting doubleness in Kant’s outlook.
[183] _Loc. cit._ pp. 611, 614, 615, 616.
[184] Kant’s _Werke_, ed. Berlin Academy, Vol. IV, 1903, pp. 393, 394;
396.
[185] Kant, 1904, p. 131.
[186] _The Problem of Conduct_, pp. 336, 337; 329.
[187] _Ibid._ p. 327.
[188] See James Seth, _A Study of Ethical Principles_, 1894, pp.
193-236, where this position, denominated there “Eudaemonism,” is
contrasted with “Hedonism,” uniquely or at least predominantly occupied
with the act’s sensational materials or concomitances, and “Rigorism,”
with its one-sided insistence upon the rational form and end of action.
[189] Taylor, _op. cit._ p. 901.
[190] _Seconde Lettre à Monsieur de Paris, Œuvres_, Vol. V, pp. 268,
269. _Lettres de M. de Cambrai à un de ses Amis, ibid._, Vol. IV, p.
168.
[191] Chantepie de la Saussaye, _Lehrbuch der Religions-Geschichte_,
ed. 1905, Vol. I, pp. 69, 73-83.
[192] Chantepie de la Saussaye, _Lehrbuch der Religions-Geschichte_,
ed. 1887, Vol. I, pp. 248, 249.
[193] _Ibid._ pp. 358, 373.
[194] Oldenberg, _Buddha_, ed. 1897, pp. 310-328; especially 313, 314;
316, 317; 327, 328.
[195] My chief authority here has been that astonishingly living and
many-sided book, Erwin Rhode’s _Psyche_, ed. 1898, especially Vol. II,
pp. 263-295 (Plato); Vol. I, pp. 14-90 (Homer); 91-110 (Hesiod); pp.
146-199 (the Heroes); pp. 279-319, and Vol. II, pp. 1-136 (Eleusinian
Mysteries, Dionysian Religion, the Orphics). The culminating interest
of this great work lies in this last treble section and in the Plato
part.
[196] _Psyche_, Vol. I, pp. 308, 312. _New Chapters in Greek History_,
1892, pp. 333, 334.
[197] See also the important study of the Abbé Touzard, _Le
Développement de la Doctrine de l’Immortalité, Revue Biblique_, 1898,
pp. 207-241.
[198] Charles, _op. cit._ pp. 52, 53; 58; 61; 84; 124, 125; 126-132;
68-77.
[199] B. Stade, _Biblische Theologie des Alten Testaments_, Vol. I,
1905, p. 184.
[200] _L’Automatisme Psychologique_, ed. 1903, p. 5.
[201] W. James, _The Principles of Psychology_, 1891, Vol. II, pp.
442-467.
[202] See Prof. James Ward’s closely knit proof in his _Naturalism and
Agnosticism_, 2nd ed., 1905, and his striking address, “Mechanism and
Morals,” _Hibbert Journal_, October, 1905.
[203] “The Desire for Immortality,” in _Humanism_ 1903, pp. 228-249.
[204] _Op. cit._ Lib. XVIII, c. x, ed. 1559, fol. 3413.
[205] Neither she nor her friends can have derived these doctrines
from Ficino’s _Theologia Platonica_, Florence, 1482, since precisely
the points in question are quite curiously absent from, or barely
recognizable in, that book. See its cc. x and xi, Book XVIII, on
“the State of the Impure Soul” and “the State of the Imperfect Soul”
respectively: ed. 1559, fol. 340, _v. seq._ See also foll. 318_r_,
319_v_.
[206] _Phaedo_, 81_a_-82_a_.
[207] _Laws_, X, 904_a-e_.
[208] _Timaeus_, 41_d_, _e_; 42_b_, _d_, I have, for clearness’ sake,
turned Plato’s indirect sentences into direct ones; and have taken
the _Timaeus_ after the _Laws_, although it is chronologically prior
to them, because the full balance of his system, (which requires the
originally lofty “place” of each individual soul),--is, I think,
abandoned in the _Laws_: see 904_a_.
[209] These four passages are all within pp. 110_b_-114_d_ of the
_Phaedo_.
[210] _Gorgias_, pp. 525_b_, _c_; 526_c_, _d_.
[211] _Ibid._ p. 523_b-e_.
[212] 2 Cor. v, 2, 3.--_Vita_, pp. 109_b_, 66_a_, 171_a_.
[213] _Republic_, X, pp. 617_e_, 619_e_, 920_e_.
[214] _Phaedrus_, p. 249_b_.
[215] _Enneads_, III, 4, 5.
[216] Enarr. in Ps. xxxvi, § 1, n. 10, ed. Ben., col. 375_b_. See also
_Enchiridion_, CIX, _ibid._ col. 402_d_.
[217] So in the _De Civitate Dei_, Lib. XXI, c. xxvi, n. 4, _ibid._
col. 1037_d_.
[218] _Confess._, Lib. I, c. 2, n. 1; X, c. 26; XIII, c. 7.
[219] _De Genesi ad litt._, Lib. VIII, n. 39, ed. Ben. col. 387_b_; n.
43, col. 389_a_.
[220] _Ibid._ Lib. XII, n. 32, col. 507_c_. He soon after attempts
to decide in favour of “incorporeal places,” as the other-world
destination of all classes of human souls.
[221] Esra IV, iv, 35. See also iv, 41; vii, 32, 80, 95, 101.
Apocalypse of Baruch, xxx, 2.
[222] _Summa Theol._ suppl., qu. 69, art. 1, in corp. et ad 3; art. 6,
in corp.; Appendix de Purgat., art. 2, in corp.; suppl., qu. 69, art 7
concl.
[223] _De gratia primi hominis_, XIV.
[224] Clemens, _Stromata_, VII, 6. Origen, _De Princ._, II, 10, 4. St.
Greg. Nyss., _Orat._, XL, 36. St. Greg. Nazianz., _Poema de Seipso_, I,
546. St. Joann. Damasc., _De Fide Orthod._, cap. ult.
[225] St. Ambros., _In Lucam_, VII, 205. St. Hieron., Ep. 124, 7;
_Apol. contra Ruf._, II; in Isa. lxv, 24.
[226] _Liber de Fide_ (413 A.D.), 27, 29; ed. Ben., coll. 313_b_,
314_c_. _De octo Dulcit. quaestm_ (422 A.D.) 12, 13; _ibid._ coll.
219_d_, 220_a_. Repeated in _Enchiridion_ (423 A.D.?), LXIX; _ibid._
col. 382_b_, _c_.
[227] _De Purgatorio_, II, 11.
[228] Denzinger, _Enchiridion_, ed. 1888, No. LXXIII.
[229] _Theol. Dogm._, Vol. II, num. 206.
[230] _Œuvres_, ed. Versailles, 1816, Vol. XI, p. 376.
[231] _Le feu du Purgatoire est-il un feu corporel? op. cit._, 1902,
pp. 263-282; 270. I owe most of my references on this point to this
paper.
[232] _Sixteen Revelations of Mother Juliana of Norwich_, 1373, ed.
1902, pp. 73, 74, 78.
[233] _Critical History of the Doctrine of a Future Life_, 1899, pp.
63, 64.
[234] _Divine Names_, ch. iv, secs, xxiii, xxiv: Parker, pp. 61-64.
[235] _Vita_, pp. 173_b_; 33_b_.
[236] _Summa Theol._, suppl., qu. 69, art. 7 ad 9.
[237] Dionysius, _Divine Names_, ch. iv, sec. xxiii: Parker, p. 63. St.
Thomas, _Summa Theol._, suppl., qu. 98, art. 1, in corp.
[238] _Enchiridion_, CX, ed. Ben., col. 403_c_; CXII, col. 404_c_.
[239] The passages here referred to will be found carefully quoted and
discussed in Petavius’s great _Dogmata Theologica, De Angelis_, III,
viii, 16, 17, with Zaccaria’s important note (ed. Fournials, 1866, Vol.
IV, pp. 119-121).
[240] _Dogmata Theologica_, Vol. IV, p. 120_b_. See also the
interesting note in the Benedictine Edition of _St. Augustine_, Vol.
VI, col. 403.
[241] _Vie de M. Emery_, by M. Gosselin, Paris, 1862, Vol. II, pp.
322-324.
[242] _Vita_ (_Trattato_), p. 173_b_.
[243] So Atzberger, in Scheeben’s _Dogmatik_, Vol. IV (1903), p. 826.
[244] _Enigmas of Life_, ed. 1892, p. 255.
[245] _Divine Names_, ch. iv, secs. 23, 24: Parker, pp, 70, 71.
[246] 2 Cor. iv, 16.
[247] See H. J. Holtzmann, Richard Rothe’s _Speculatives System_, 1899,
pp. 110, 111; 123, 124;--Georg Class, _Phänomenologie und Ontologie des
Menschlichen Geistes_, 1896, pp. 220, 221;--and that strange mixture of
stimulating thought, deep earnestness, and fantastic prejudice, Edward
White’s _Life of Christ_, ed. 1876.
[248] _Grammar of Assent_, 1870, p. 417. _Hard Sayings_, 1898, p. 113.
[249] G. E. Lessing, “Leibniz von den Ewigen Strafen,” in Lessing’s
_Sämmtliche Werke_, ed. Lachmann-Muncker, 1895, Vol. XI, p. 486. D. F.
Strauss, _Die christliche Glaubenslehre_, 1841, Vol. II, pp. 684, 685.
Carl von Hase, _Handbuch der protestantischen Polemik_, ed. 1864, p.
422. G. T. Fechner, _Die drei Gründe und Motive des Glaubens_, 1863,
pp. 146, 147, 177. G. Anrich, “Clemens und Origenes, als Begründer
der Lehre vom Fegfeuer,” in _Theologische Abhandlungen für H. J.
Holtzmann_, 1902, p. 120.
[250] W. R. Greg, _Enigmas of Life_, ed. 1892, pp. 256, 257, 259. J. S.
Mill, _Three Essays on Religion_, ed. 1874, p. 211.
[251] Sess. XXV, Decret. de Purgatorio, med.
[252] N. Paulus, _Johann Tetzel_ 1899. Brieger’s review, _Theologische
Literatur-Zeitung_, 1900, coll. 117, 118.
[253] 1 Cor. xv, 29.
[254] _De Corona_, III, IV. See M. Salomon Reinach’s interesting
paper, “l’Origine des Prières pour les Morts,” in _Cultes, Mythes, et
Religions_, 1905, pp. 316-331.
[255] W. Bacher, _Die Agada der palästinensischen Amoräer_, Vol. I,
1892, p. 331.
[256] _Strom._, VII, 26 (Migne, _Ser. Graec_, Vol. IX, col. 541); I, 26
(_ibid._ Vol. VIII, col. 916); VII, 26 (_ibid._ Vol. IX, col. 540).
[257] _De Princ._, II, 10, 6. _De Orat._, XXIX, p. 263.
[258] _Paedag._, I, 8, p. 51; and Plato, _Gorgias_, p. 477_a_.
[259] I owe here almost everything to the truly classical account in
Rhode’s _Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. II, pp. 1-136.
[260] _Republic_ II, p. 364_b_, _c_, _e_.
[261] I take these passages from Anrich’s _Clemens und Origenes, op.
cit._ p. 102, n. 5.
[262] Clemens, _Strom._, V, 3, p. 236. Origen, _Contra Cels._, VII, 13.
Clemens, _Strom._, IV, 24. Origen, _Contra Cels._, IV, 13.
[263] Dionysius, _Divine Names_, ch. iv, sec. 24: Parker, p. 64. St.
Thomas, _Summa Theol._ I, ii, qu. 86, art. 1 ad 3 et concl.
[264] _Treatise on Purgatory_, by St. Catherine of Genoa, ed. 1880, p.
31.
[265] Plato, _Cratylus_, p. 400_c_. _Republic_, II, p. 364_e_.
Euripides, _Orestes_ XXX, _seq._, with Schol. Rhode, _op. cit._ Vol.
II, p. 101, n. 2.
[266] _Natur. quaest._ III, 28, 7; 30, 7, 8.
[267] Disp. XI, Sec. iv, art. 2, §§ 13, 10; Disp. XLVII, Sec. i, art 6.
[268] Scheeben’s _Dogmatik_ Vol. IV, 1903, pp. 856 (No. 93), 723.
[269] See Abbé Boudhinon’s careful article, “Sur l’Histoire des
Indulgences,” _Revue d’Histoire et de Littérature Religieuses_, 1898,
pp. 435-455, for a vivid illustration of the necessity of explaining
the details of this doctrine and practice by history of the most
patient kind.
[270] Denzinger, _Enchiridion_, ed. 1888, Nos. 387, 588, 859.
[271] Denzinger, _ibid._, Hurter, _op. cit._ ed. 1893, Vol. III, p. 591.
[272] Denzinger, Nos. 778, 951.
[273] Cardinal Manning in _Treatise_, ed. cit. p. 31.
[274] _Op. cit._ pp. 119, 120: “The Purgatory of the Catholic Church,
in strictness, bears its name without warrant.”
[275] _Cat._, cc. viii, 35.
[276] _De octo Dulcitii quaest._ 12, 13.
[277] _Summa Theol._, app., qu. 2, art. 4, in corp. et ad 4.
[278] _Divina Commedia_, Purg. II, 40-42. See Faber, _All for Jesus_,
ed. 1889, p. 361.
[279] _De Purgatorio_, Lib. I, c. iv, 6; c. xiv, 22.
[280] _Les Controverses_, Pt. III, ch. ii, art. 1 (end); _Œuvres_,
Annecy, 1892 _seq._, Vol. I, p. 365.
[281] Faber’s _All for Jesus_, 1853, ch. ix, sec. 4; Cardinal Manning’s
Appendix (B) to Engl. tr. of St. Catherine’s _Treatise on Purgatory_,
1858; Cardinal Newman’s _Dream of Gerontius_, 1865.
[282] _In Rom._, Tom. II, i, p. 477.
[283] _Richard Rothe’s Spekulatives System_, 1899, pp. 123, 124.
[284] _Richard Rothe’s Spekulatives System_, 1899, pp. 69; 74, 75.
[285] St. Augustine, _Confessions_, Lib. XI, ch. xxvii, 3; ch. xx; ch.
xi. _De Trinit._, Lib. XV, ch. 16, ed. Ben., col. 1492 D.--St. Thomas,
_Summa Theol._, I, qu. 12, art. 10, in corp.
[286] I am here but giving an abstract of Mr. F. C. S. Schiller’s
admirable essay, “Activity and Substance,” pp. 204-227 of his
_Humanism_, 1903, where all the Aristotelian passages are carefully
quoted and discussed. He is surely right in translating ἠρεμία by
“constancy,” not by “rest.”
[287] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 4, art. 1, concl. qu. 25, art. 1 ad 2 et
concl.
[288] Matt. xxii, 32.
[289] _Metaphysic_, xii, 1072_b_, 1074_b_.
[290] E. Caird, _Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers_, 1904
Vol. II, pp. 12, 16. See here, too, the fine discussion of the other,
rightly immanental as well as transcendental, teaching of Aristotle,
pp. 15, 21.
[291] _Summa Theol._, I, ii, qu. 3, art. 2 ad 4; art. 4, concl.
[292] _Ibid._ I, qu. 14, art. 4, in corp.; qu. 19, art. I, concl.; qu.
20, art. I, concl.
[293] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 14, art. 11, 3; qu. 14, art. 2, ad 2; I,
ii, qu. 3, art. 2 ad 4.
[294] _Ibid._ I, qu. 12, art. 8 ad 4; I, ii, qu. 4, art. 8 ad 3.
[295] _Ibid._ I, qu. 14, art. 8, in corp.; art. 11, contra et concl.;
art. 8, concl.; art. 11, concl.--_Contra Gent._, Lib. III, c. xxi, in
fine.
[296] _Summa Theol._, II, ii, qu. 3, art. 4, 4; I, qu. 19, art. 2, in
corp.; qu. 20, art. 1 ad 1; ad 3; art. 2 ad 1.
[297] Mark xii, 28-34 and parallels; Matt, x, 29; Luke xii, 6; Matt,
xxv, 10; Mark xiv, 25 and parallels, and elsewhere; Apoc. vii, 9.
[298] Matt. xviii, 12-14; Luke xv, 1-10; John x, 11-16 (Ezekiel xxxiv,
12-19).
[299] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 47, art. 1, in corp.
[300] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 29, art. 3 ad 4; ad 2; in corp. _Contra
Gent._, Lib. II, c. xciv, init.; c. xciii.
[301] _Excitationum_, Lib. VIII, 604.
[302] _The World and the Individual_, Vol. II, p. 430.
[303] G. E. Lessing: _Leibniz von den Ewigen Strafen, Werke_, ed.
Lachmann-Muncker, Vol. XI, 1895, p. 482. E. Troeltsch, _Theologische
Rundschau_, 1893, p. 72.
[304] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 12, art. 1, in corp.; art. 7, in corp.;
art. 6 ad 1.
[305] “A Spiritual Canticle,” stanza vii, 10, in _Works_, transl. by D.
Lewis, ed. 1891, pp. 206, 207.
[306] _Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft_, Werke, ed.
Hartenstein, 1868, Vol. VI, pp. 252, 274.
[307] _Kant_, 1904, pp. 129-132.
[308] _Das Historische in Kant’s Religions-philosophie, Kant-Studien_,
1904, pp. 43, 44.
[309] “Das Heilige,” in _Präludien_, 1903, pp. 356, 357.
[310] _Elements of the Science of Religion_, 1897, Vol. I, pp. 274,
275; Vol. II, p. 23.
[311] _Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott_, ed. 1892, p. 281.
[312] _Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott_, ed. 1892, pp. 27, 28; 230,
231; 262; 23.
[313] E. Caird, _Development of Theology in the Greek Philosophers_,
Vol. I, pp, 367, 362. The whole chapter, “Does the Primacy belong to
Reason or to Will?” pp. 350-382, is admirable in its richness and
balance.
[314] _Verkehr des Christen_, pp. 15, 16.
[315] I. Kant, “Anthropologie,” in _Werke_, ed. Berlin Academy,
Vol. VII, 1907, pp. 135, 136. G. W. Leibniz, “Nouveaux Essais sur
l’Entendement,” in _Die philosophischen Schriften von G. W. L._,” ed.
Gerhardt, Vol. V, 1882, pp. 8, 10; 45, 69, 100, 121, 122.
[316] All this first clearly formulated by Leibniz, _op. cit._ pp. 121,
122.
[317] See his _Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, pp. 209-211;
242, 243; and elsewhere.
[318] _The Prophets of Israel_, 1882, pp. 11, 12; 10, 11.
[319] _Lex Orandi_, 1903, pp. xxix, xxxi.
[320] M. Jastrow, _The Study of Religion_, 1901, pp. 279-286. C. P.
Tiele, _Elements of the Science of Religion_, 1897, Vol. II, pp.
227-234; L. W. E. Rauwenhoff, _Religions-philosophie_, Germ. tr., ed.
1894, pp. 109-124. R. Eucken, _Der Wahrheitsgehalt der Religion_, 1901,
pp. 59-238; 303-399. There are important points in pp. 425-438, which I
do not accept.
[321] _Rothe’s Spekulatives System_, 1899, pp. 25, 26.
[322] _Elements of the Science of Religion_, 1897, Vol. II, pp. 61, 62.
[323] _Der Kampf um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt_, 1896, p. 309.
[324] _The Evolution of Religion_, 1893, Vol. II, p. 313.
[325] “Grundprobleme der Ethik,” in _Zeitschrift für Theologie und
Kirche_, 1902, pp. 164; 166, 167; 172.
[326] _Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung_, I, Anhang, p. 653.
[327] A. E. Taylor’s _The Problem of Conduct_, 1901, contains, pp.
469-487, a very vigorous and suggestive study of the similarities and
differences between Morality and Religion, marred though it is by
paradox and impatience.
[328] J. Volkelt, _Immanuel Kant’s Erkenntnisstheorie_, 1879, pp. 258,
259.
[329] _Ibid._ pp. 206, 208, 209.
[330] J. Volkelt, _Immanuel Kant’s Erkenntnisstheorie_, 1879, p. 244.
[331] James Ward, “Present Problems of Psychology,” in (American)
_Philosophical Review_, 1904, p. 607. J. Volkelt, _Kant’s
Erkenntnisstheorie_, p. 241.
[332] In a Letter of 1772, _Briefe_, ed. Berlin Academy, Vol. I, 1900,
p. 126.
[333] H. Jones, _A Critical Account of the Philosophy of Lotze_, 1895,
pp. 102-104; 106, 107; 108, 111.
[334] _The Present Problems_, pp. 606, 607.
[335] J. Volkelt, _Erfahrung und Denken_, 1886, p. 485.
[336] James Ward, “On the Definition of Psychology,” in _Journal of
Psychology_, Vol. I, 1904, p. 25.
[337] There is a good description of this doctrine in H. Höffding’s
_Sören Kierkegaard_, Stuttgart, 1896, pp. 100-104.
[338] Höffding’s _Kierkegaard_, pp. 119, 120.
[339] _Ibid._ p. 123.
[340] See _Works_, ed. London, 1898, Vol. II, pp. 299-306.
[341] _Quaestio Mystica_, at the end of the notes to Chapter V of
Dionysius’s _Mystical Theology_, ed. Migne, 1889, Vol. I, pp. 1050-1058.
[342] _In Librum Boetii de Trinitate_, in D. Thomae Aquinatis _Opera_,
ed. altera Veneta, Vol. VIII, 1776, pp. 341_b_, 342_a_; 291_a_.
[343] _Mystical Theology_, Dr. Parker, pp. 135, 136. I have somewhat
modified Parker’s rendering.
[344] _Religions-philosophie_, German tr. ed. 1894, p. 116. His scheme
finds three psychological forms and constituents in all religion,
Intellectualism, Mysticism, Moralism, each with its own advantages and
dangers.
[345] _Confessions_: “Evil, Negative,” VII, 12, etc. “Evil, Positive,”
VI, 15; VIII, 5, 11, etc.
[346] _Opus Imperfectum_, III, 56, ed. Ben., Vol. X, col. 1750_b_.
_De Nuptiis et Concupiscentia_, I, 23, _ibid._ col. 625_a_.--M. L.
Grandgeorge, in his memoir _St. Augustin et le Neo-Platonisme_,
1896, gives an interesting collection of such Negative and Positive
declarations, and traces the former to their precise sources in
Plotinus, pp. 126, 127; 130, 131.
[347] _Divine Names_, ch. iv, sec. xxiv.
[348] _Summa Theol._, I, ii, qu. 86, art. 1 ad 3.
[349] _Vita_, pp. 39_b_, 116_b_.
[350] _Sixteen Revelations_, ed. 1902, pp. 69, 70.
[351] Meister Ekhart’s “Lateinische Schriften,” published by Denifle,
_Archiv f. Litteratur u. Kirchengeschichte des M. A._, 1886, p. 662.
[352] _Ethica_, II, def. vi; IV, prop. lxiv et coroll.; ed. Van Vloten
et Land, 1895, Vol. I, pp. 73, 225.
[353] _Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten_, 1785, _Werke_, ed.
Berlin Academy, Vol. IV, 1903, p. 393. _Religion innerhalb der Grenzen
der reinen Vernunft_, 1793, _Werke_, ed. Hartenstein, Vol. VI, 1868,
pp. 127, 128.
[354] _The Origin and Propagation of Sin_, 1902, p. 125.
[355] _Wahrheitsgehalt der Religion_, 1901, pp. 271, 272.
[356] Prof. Höffding, in his _Sören Kierkegaard_, pp. 130, 131.
[357] “Le Dogme du Pêché Originel dans S. Augustin,” _Revue d’Histoire
et de Littérature Religieuses_, 1901, 1902. See too F. R. Tennant, _The
Sources of the Doctrine of the Fall and Original Sin_, 1903, which,
however, descends only to St. Ambrose inclusively.
[358] So F. R. Tennant, _The Origin and Propagation of Sin_, 1902, pp.
131, 110.
[359] F. R. Tennant, _The Origin and Propagation of Sin_, 1902, pp. 82,
95; 107, 108; 115.
[360] _Ibid._ p. 83.
[361] _Ibid._ p. 153.
[362] _Summa Theol._, II, ii, qu. 24, art. 7, in corp.
[363] _Psychology and Life_, 1899, pp. 267, 268. _Grundzüge der
Psychologie_, Vol. I, 1900, pp. 170, 171.
[364] Mr. W. R. Inge, in his useful _Christian Mysticism_, 1899, has
some sharp expressions of disgust against these long-lived survivals
within the Catholic Church. And though his own tone towards Rome in
general belongs also, surely, to a more or less barbaric past, he has
done good service in drawing forcible attention to the matter.
[365] _Sixteen Revelations_, ed. 1902, pp. 23, 84, 101.
[366] _Ascent of Mount Carmel_, tr. Lewis, 1891, pp. 159; 26, 27; 195,
265.
[367] _Confessions_, Bk. XI, ch. xxiii, 1. Tract in Joann. Ev., VIII,
1; XXIV, 1: ed. Ben., Vol. III, 2, coll. 1770 _b_, 1958 _d_.
[368] _Sixteen Revelations_, ed. cit. p. 210.
[369] J. N. Grou, _Méditations sur l’Amour de Dieu_, Nouvelle ed.
Perisse, pp. 268, 271.
[370] L. Laberthonnière, _Annales de Philosophie Chrétienne_, 1905,
1906. G. Tyrrell, _Hard Sayings_, 1898; _External Religion_, 1902. A.
Sandreau, _La Vie d’Union à Dieu_, 1900; _L’Etat Mystique_, 1903.
[371] M. D. Petre, _The Soul’s Orbit_, 1904, p. 113.
[372] _Göttinger Gelehrte Anzeigen_, 1901, p. 757.
[373] Zeller, _Philosophie der Griechen_, II, 2, ed. 1879, pp. 309, 312.
[374] _Ibid._ p. 348.
[375] Republic, VI, 508_e_; VII, 517_b_; and Zeller, _ibid._ II, 1, ed.
1889, pp. 707-710.
[376] _Philebus_, 22_c_; _Timaeus_, 28_a_, _c_; 29_e_, 92_c_ (with the
reading ὅδε ὁ κόσμος … εἰκὼν τοῦ ποιητοῦ).
[377] _Timaeus_, 29_e_.
[378] _Enneads_, I, vii, 1, 61_d_; I, viii, 2, 72_e_; VI, viii, 16,
end. See, for all this, Zeller, _Philosophie der Griechen_, III, ii,
ed. 1881, pp. 476-480; 483; 510-414.
[379] _Enneads_, VIII. ix, 350_b_; VI, 2317, 610_d_; III, ix, 3, 358_a,
b_.
[380] Zeller, _op. cit._ III, ii, pp. 787-789.
[381] _Divine Names_, ch. v, sec. 1: tr. Parker, pp. 73-75.
[382] _Mystical Theology_, ch. iii: Parker, pp. 135, 136.
[383] _Mystical Theology_, ch. iv, sec. 2: Parker, pp. 136, 137.
[384] _De Divisione Naturae_, III, 17; I, 78. Ueberweg-Heinze,
_Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie_, Vol. II, ed. 1898, p. 159.
[385] Secs. 2, 4, ed. Bardenhewer, 1882, pp. 163-166.
[386] Commentarius, in _Aristotelis Metaphysica_, Tract. VIII, cap. 6,
quoted by Denifle, _Archiv f. Litteratur-u-Kirchengeschichte_, 1886, p.
520.
[387] Ibn Gebirol, _Fons Vitae_, ed. Bäumker, 1895: IV, 6, pp. 225,
224; V, 22, p. 298; II, 20, pp. 60-61; V, 24, p. 301.
[388] _De Ente et Essentia_, c. vi. _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 3, art. 4 ad
1; and elsewhere.
[389] _De Ente et Essentia_, c. ii.
[390] See Ueberweg-Heinze, _op. cit._ pp. 280, 281.
[391] _De rerum Principio_, qu. viii. Ueberweg-Heinze, _op. cit._ pp.
295, 296.
[392] H. S. Denifle, _Meister Eckhart’s Lateinische Schriften_, _loc.
cit._ pp. 489, 490; 540, n. 6.
[393] _Ibid._ p. 519.
[394] _Meister Eckhart_, ed. Pfeiffer, 1857, pp. 158, 1; 99, 8; 180,
15; 532, 30; 320, 27; 288, 26; 207, 27.
[395] Denzinger, _Enchiridion Symbolorum_, ed. 1888, Nos. 437, 455.
[396] _Hegelianism and Personality_, ed. 1893, pp. 230, 231, and note.
[397] _Phaedrus_, 245 d; Zeller, _op. cit._ II, 1, ed. 1889, p. 830.
[398] _Ibid._ pp. 843, 844; 849, 850.
[399] Pre-existence of the Noûs: _Gen. Anim._, II, 3, 736_b_; _de
Anima_, III, 5, 430_a_; Zeller, _op. cit._ II, 2, ed. 1879, pp. 593,
595. The Supreme Noûs, purely transcendent: _Metaph._, XII, 7-10. But
see Dr. Edward Caird’s admirable pp. 1-30, Vol. II, of his _Evolution
of Theology in the Greek Philosophers_, 1904.
[400] Rom. viii, 11. See too Rom. viii, 9, 14; 1 Cor. iii, 16; vi, 11;
vii, 40; xii, 3.
[401] H. J. Holtzmann, _Lehrbuch der N. T. Theology_, 1897, Vol. II,
pp. 9-12; 15-18.
[402] H. J. Holtzmann, _op. cit._ Vol. II, pp. 79, 80. Johannes Weiss,
_Dic Nachfolge Christi_, 1895, p. 95.
[403] Col. iii, 4; Phil. i, 21; Gal. ii, 20.
[404] _Enneads_, V, book 1, cc. 3 and 6.
[405] _Ibid._ VI, book 9, 9 and 11.
[406] _Eckhart_, ed. Pfeiffer, pp. 113, 33; 469, 40, 36.
[407] Denzinger, _op. cit._ No. 454.
[408] _Vier Schriften von Johannes Ruysbroek_, ed. Ullmann, 1848, pp.
106, 107.
[409] _Life, written by Herself_, tr. D. Lewis, ed. 1888, pp. 124, 421,
146.
[410] _Life, written by Herself_, tr. D. Lewis, ed. 1888, pp. 355, 130,
430; 174.
[411] J. B. Schwab, _Johannes Gerson_, 1858, pp. 361, 362.
[412] I can find but one, secondary Ecclesiastical Censure of the
doctrine of God’s substantial presence in the soul,--the censure passed
by the Paris Sorbonne on Peter Lombard. The same Sorbonne repeatedly
censured St. Thomas on other points.
[413] Vol. II, pp. 210, 211.
[414] _Ibid._ pp. 230, 231.
[415] _Ibid._ p. 231.
[416] _Ibid._ pp. 253-257. _Enneads_, V, book ii, i.
[417] Vol. II, pp. 232, 233.
[418] “Religions-philosophie,” in _Die Philosophie im Beginn des
zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts_, 1904, Vol. I, pp. 115, 117.
[419] _Religions-philosophie_, Germ. tr., ed. 1894, p. 140.
[420] “Martineau’s Philosophy,” _Hibbert Journal_, Vol. I, 1902, pp.
458, 457.
[421] _Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott_, ed. 1892, pp. 27, 15, 28,
231.
[422] _Der Verkehr des Christen mit Gott_, ed. 1892, pp. 20; 19-25.
[423] _Timaeus_, 29_e_, _seq._
[424] _Metaph._, VII, 1072_b_; IX, 1074_b_.
[425] See Caird, _op. cit._ II, p. 337.
[426] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 13, art. 5, concl. et in corp. (See the
interesting note, “The Meaning of Analogy,” in Fr. Tyrrell’s _Lex
Orandi_, 1903, pp. 80-83.) _In Librum Boetii de Trinitate_: D. Thomae
Aquinatis _Opera_, ed. Veneta Altera, 1776, p. 341_b_, 342_a_.
[427] _Summa Theol._, I, qu. 8, art. 2; qu. 12, art. 1, in corp.
[428] For Leibniz, see especially his _Nouveaux Essais_, written in
1701-1709, but not published till 1765: _Die Philosophischen Schriften
van G. W. Leibniz_, ed. Gebhardt, Vol. V, 1882, especially pp. 45; 67;
69; 121, 122. For the date 1888, see W. James’s _Varieties of Religious
Experience_, 1902, p. 233.
[429] _Autobiography_, ed. 1875, pp. 133, 134.
[430] “Die Selbständigkeit der Religion”: _Zeitschrift f. Theologie u.
Kirche_, 1895, pp. 404, 405.
[431] _Elements of the Science of Religion_, 1897, Vol. II, pp. 227-231.
[432] _Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung_, ed. Griesbach, Vol. II, pp.
725, 734, 736.
[433] _The Varieties of Religious Experience_, 1902, pp. 362, 364.
[434] _Ascent of Mount Carmel_, tr. David Lewis, ed. 1889, pp. 94, 95,
97.
[435] _Ascent_, pp. 94; 350.
[436] _Ascent_, p. 353.
[437] _Sören Kierkegaard_, von Harald Höffding, Germ. tr. 1896, pp.
116, 118, 120.
[438] _Ibid._ pp. 122; 130, 131.
[439] _Lehrbuch der Dogmengeschichte_, ed. 1888, Vol. II, pp. 413, 414;
417.
[440] _Das Wesen des Christenthums_, ed. 1902, pp. 180, 181.
[441] Höffding’s _Kierkegaard_, p. 119.
[442] _The Faith of the Million_, 1901, Vol. II, pp. 49, 50; 52, 53.
[443] _Works_, tr. David Lewis, ed. 1889, 1891, Vol. I, p. 308; Vol.
II, p. 541.
[444] _Op. cit._ p. 53.
[445] _Ibid._ pp. 55, 56.
[446] _Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. II, pp. 292, 293.
[447] “Grundprobleme der Ethik”: _Zeitschrift für Theologie und
Kirche_, 1902, pp. 164, 167.
[448] “Was heisst Wesen des Christenthums?” _Christliche Welt_,
1903, I, coll. 583, 584. The Abbé Loisy has also dwelt, with rare
impressiveness, upon the intensely Other-Worldly character of the first
Christian teaching.
[449] _Deutsche Mystiker des Mittelalters_, ed. Pfeiffer, Vol. I,
1845, pp. xli, xlii. Any Life of St. Jane F. de Chantal. A. Cadrès,
_Le P. Jean N. Grou_, 1866, pp. 13, 14. St. Teresa’s _Life, written by
Herself_, tr. David Lewis, ed. 1888, pp. 176, 177; 186. _Revelations of
Divine Love, showed to Mother Juliana of Norwich_, ed. 1902, p. 4.
[450] A. Gardner, “Confession and Direction,” in _The Conflict of
Duties_, 1903, pp. 223-229. P. Gardner, in _The Liberal Churchman_,
1905, p. 266.
[451] _Psyche_, ed. 1898, Vol. II, p. 289.
[452] “Christianity and Physical Science” (1855), in _Idea of a
University_, ed. 1873, pp. 432, 433. “University Teaching” (1852),
_ibid._ p. 222. See Mr. R. E. Froude’s interesting paper, “Scientific
Speculation and the Unity of Truth,” _Dublin Review_, Oct. 1900, pp.
353-368.
[453] W. Windelband, _Geschichte und Naturwissenschaft_, 1894. H.
Rickert, _Kulturwissenschaft und Naturwissenschaft_, 1899. And,
above all, H. Rickert, _Die Grenzen der Naturwissenschaftlichen
Begriffsbildung_, 1902.
[454] _Schopenhauer_, 1900, pp. 344, 345.
[455] _Wie ist der Kampf um die Bedeutung … Jesu zu beendigen?_ 1901,
p. 9.
[456] _Wie ist der Kampf um die Bedeutung … Jesu zu beendigen?_ 1901,
p. 10.
[457] _Ibid._ pp. 10, 11.
[458] _Ibid._ pp. 26, 27.
[459] “Ueber den letzten Unterschied der philosophischen Systeme,”
1847, in _Beiträge zur Philosophie_, 1855, Vol. II, p. 10.
[460] See the admirably lucid analysis in Prof. Troeltsch’s
“Religions-philosophie,” in _Die Philosophie im Beginn des zwanzigsten
Jahrhunderts_, 1904, Vol. I, p. 116, already referred to further back.
[461] _Richard Rothe’s Spekulatives System_, 1899, pp. 205, 206.
_Richard Clay & Sons, Limited, London and Bungay._