OF FATE.[109]

I WILL endeavor, my dearest Piso, to send you my opinion concerning

Fate, written with all the clearness and compendiousness I am capable

of; since you, who are not ignorant how cautious I am of writing, have

thought fit to make it the subject of your request.

1. You are first then to know that this word Fate is spoken and

understood two manner of ways; the one as it is an energy, the other

as it is a substance. First therefore, as it is an action, Plato[110]

has under a type described it, saying thus in his dialogue entitled

Phaedrus: “And this is a sanction of Adrastea (or an inevitable

ordinance), that whatever soul being an attendant on God,” &c. And

in his treatise called Timaeus: “The laws which God in the nature of

the universe has established for immortal souls.” And in his book of

a Commonweal he calls Fate “the speech of the virgin Lachesis, who is

the daughter of Necessity.” By which sentences he not tragically but

theologically shows us what his sentiments are in this matter. Now if

any one, translating the fore-cited passages, would have them expressed

in more familiar terms, the description in Phaedrus may be thus

explained: That Fate is a divine sentence, intransgressible because

its cause cannot be divested or hindered. And according to what he has

said in his Timaeus, it is a law ensuing on the nature of the universe,

according to which all things that are done are transacted. For this

does Lachesis effect, who is indeed the daughter of Necessity,—as we

have both already related, and shall yet better understand by that

which will be said in the progress of our discourse. Thus you see what

Fate is, when it is taken for an action.

2. But as it is a substance, it seems to be the universal soul of

the world, and admits of a threefold distribution; the first destiny

being that which errs not; the second, that which is thought to err;

and the third that which, being under the heaven, is conversant about

the earth. Of these, the highest is called Clotho, the next Atropos,

and the lowest, Lachesis; who, receiving the celestial influences

and efficacies of her sisters, transmits and fastens them to the

terrestrial things which are under her government. Thus have we

declared briefly what is to be said of Fate, taken as a substance;

what it is, what are its parts, after what manner it is, how it is

ordained, and how it stands, both in respect to itself and to us. But

as to the particularities of these things, there is another fable in

his Commonweal, by which they are in some measure covertly insinuated,

and we ourselves have, in the best manner we can, endeavored to explain

them to you.

3. But we now once again turn our discourse to Fate, as it is an

energy. For concerning this it is that there are so many natural,

moral, and logical questions. Having therefore already in some sort

sufficiently defined what it is, we are now in the next place to say

something of its quality, although it may to many seem absurd. I

say then that Fate, though comprehending as it were in a circle the

infinity of all those things which are and have been from infinite

times and shall be to infinite ages, is not in itself infinite, but

determinate and finite; for neither law, reason, nor any other divine

thing can be infinite. And this you will the better understand, if

you consider the total revolution and the whole time in which the

revolutions of the eight circles (that is, of the eight spheres of the

fixed stars, sun, moon, and five planets), having (as Timaeus[111]

says) finished their course, return to one and the same point, being

measured by the circle of the Same, which goes always after one manner.

For in this order, which is finite and determinate, shall all things

(which, as well in heaven as in earth, consist by necessity from above)

be reduced to the same situation, and restored again to their first

beginning. Wherefore the habitude of heaven alone, being thus ordained

in all things, as well in regard of itself as of the earth and all

terrestrial matters, shall again (after long revolutions) one day

return; and those things that in order follow after, and being linked

together in a continuity are maintained in their course, shall be

present, every one of them by necessity bringing what is its own. But

for the better clearing of this matter, let us understand that whatever

is in us or about us is not wrought by the course of the heavens and

heavenly influences, as being entirely the efficient cause both of my

writing what I now write, and of your doing also what you at present

do, and in the same manner as you do it. Hereafter then, when the same

cause shall return, we shall do the same things we now do, and in the

same manner, and shall again become the same men; and so it will be

with all others. And that which follows after shall also happen by

the following cause; and in brief, all things that shall happen in

the whole and in every one of these universal revolutions shall again

become the same. By this it appears (as we have said before) that

Fate, being in some sort infinite, is nevertheless determinate and

finite; and it may be also in some sort seen and comprehended, as we

have farther said, that it is as it were a circle. For as a motion of a

circle is a circle, and the time that measures it is also a circle; so

the order of things which are done and happen in a circle may be justly

esteemed and called a circle.

4. This therefore, though there should be nothing else, almost shows

us what sort of thing Fate is; but not particularly or in every

respect. What kind of thing then is it in its own form? It is, as far

as one can compare it, like to the civil or politic law. For first it

commands the most part of things at least, if not all, conditionally;

and then it comprises (as far as is possible for it) all things that

belong to the public in general; and the better to make you understand

both the one and the other, we must specify them by an example. The

civil law speaks and ordains in general of a valiant man, and also of

a deserter and a coward; and in the same manner of others. Now this

is not to make the law speak of this or that man in particular, but

principally to propose such things as are universal or general, and

consequently such as fall under them. For we may very well say, that

it is legal to reward this man for having demeaned himself valiantly,

and to punish that man for flying from his colors; because the law has

virtually—though not in express terms and particularly yet in such

general ones as they are comprehended under,—so determined of them.

As the law (if I may so speak) of physicians and masters of corporal

exercises potentially comprehends particular and special things within

the general; so the law of Nature, determining first and principally

general matters, secondarily and consequently determines such as are

particular. Thus, general things being decreed by Fate, particular and

individual things may also in some sort be said to be so, because

they are so by consequence with the general. But perhaps some one of

those who more accurately examine and more subtly search into these

things may say, on the contrary, that particular and individual things

precede the composition of general things, and that the general exist

only for the particular, since that for which another thing is always

goes before that which is for it. Nevertheless, this is not the proper

place to treat of this difficulty, but it is to be remitted to another.

However, that Fate comprehends not all things clearly and expressly,

but only such as are universal and general, let it pass for resolved

on at present, as well for what we have already said a little before,

as for what we shall say hereafter. For that which is finite and

determinate, agreeing properly with divine Providence, is seen more in

universal and general things than in particular; such therefore is the

divine law, and also the civil; but infinity consists in particulars

and individuals.

After this we are to declare what this term “conditionally” means; for

it is to be thought that Fate is also some such thing. That then is

said to be conditionally, which is supposed to exist not of itself or

absolutely, but as really dependent upon and joined to another; which

signifies a suit and consequence. “And this is the sanction of Adrastea

(or an inevitable ordinance), that whatever soul, being an attendant

on God, shall see any thing of truth, shall till another revolution be

exempt from punishment; and if it is always able to do the same, it

shall never suffer any damage.”[112] This is said both conditionally

and also universally. Now that Fate is some such thing is clearly

manifest, as well from its substance as from its name. For it is called

εἱμαρμένη as being εἰρομένη, that is, dependent and linked; and it is

a sanction or law, because things are therein ordained and disposed

consequentially, as is usual in civil government.

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) · 第 100 / 183 题