Who, frighted, bowed his back, more than his rider would,[62]

so that, being more ready to help them in their misfortunes than was

requisite, he seemed to be privy to their injustices. For he saved

Phoebidas, who was accused for having without commission surprised

the castle of Thebes, called Cadmea, saying that such enterprises

were to be attempted without expecting any orders. And when Sphodrias

was brought to trial for an unlawful and heinous act, having made

an incursion into Attica at such time as the Athenians were allies

and confederates of the Spartans, he procured him to be acquitted,

being softened by the amorous entreaties of his son. There is also

recorded a short epistle of his to a certain prince, written in

these words: If Nicias is innocent, discharge him; if he is guilty,

discharge him for my sake; but however it is, discharge him. But

Phocion (on the contrary) would not so much as appear in behalf of

his son-in-law Charicles, when he was accused for having taken money

of Harpalus; but having said, Only for acts of justice have I made

you my son-in-law,—went his way. And Timoleon the Corinthian, when he

could not by admonitions or requests dissuade his brother from being a

tyrant, confederated with his destroyers. For a magistrate ought not to

be a friend even to the altar (or till he comes to the point of being

forsworn), as Pericles sometime said, but no farther than is agreeable

to all law, justice, and the utility of the state; any of which being

neglected brings a great and public damage, as did the not executing of

justice on Sphodrias and Phoebidas, who did not a little contribute to

the engaging of Sparta in the Leuctrian war.

Otherwise, reason of state is so far from necessitating one to show

himself severe on every peccadillo of his friends, that it even permits

him, when he has secured the principal affairs of the public, to assist

them, stand by them, and labor for them. There are, moreover, certain

favors that may be done without envy, as is the helping a friend to

obtain an office, or rather the putting into his hands some honorable

commission or some laudable embassy, such as for the congratulating or

honoring some prince or the making a league of amity and alliance with

some state. But if there be some difficult but withal illustrious and

great action to be performed, having first taken it upon himself, he

may afterwards assume a friend to his assistance, as did Diomedes, whom

Homer makes to speak in this manner:

Since a companion you will have me take,

How can I think a better choice to make,

Than the divine Ulysses?[63]

And Ulysses again as kindly attributes to him the praise of the

achievement, saying:

These stately steeds, whose country you demand,

Nestor, were hither brought from Thracian land,

Whose king, with twelve of his best friends, lies dead,

All slain by th’ hand of warlike Diomed.[64]

For this sort of concession no less adorns the praiser than the

praised; but self-conceitedness, as Plato says, dwells with solitude.

He ought moreover to associate his friends in those good and kind

offices which are done by him, bidding those whom he has benefited

to love them and give them thanks, as having been the procurers and

counsellors of his favors to them. But he must reject the dishonest and

unreasonable request of his friends, yet not churlishly but mildly,

teaching and showing them that they are not beseeming their virtue

and honor. Never was any man better at this than Epaminondas, who,

having denied to deliver out of prison a certain victualler, when

requested by Pelopidas, and yet a little after dismissing him at the

desire of his miss, said to his friend, These, O Pelopidas, are favors

fit for wenches to receive, and not for generals. Cato on the other

side acted morosely and insolently, when Catulus the censor, his most

intimate and familiar friend, interceded with him for one of those

against whom he, being quaestor, had entered process, saying: It would

be a shame if you, who ought to reform young men for us, should be

thrust out by our servants. For he might, though in effect refusing

the requested favor, have yet forborne that severity and bitterness

of speech; so that his doing what was displeasing to his friend might

have seemed not to have proceeded from his own inclination, but to

have been a necessity imposed upon him by law and justice. There are

also in the administration of the state methods, not dishonorable, of

assisting our poorer friends in the making of their fortune. Thus did

Themistocles, who, seeing after a battle one of those which lay dead

in the field adorned with chains of gold and jewels, did himself pass

by him; but turning back to a friend of his, said, Do you take these

spoils, for you are not yet come to be Themistocles. For even the

affairs themselves do frequently afford a statesman such opportunities

of benefiting his friends; for every man is not a Menemachus. To one

therefore give the patronage of a cause, both just and beneficial; to

another recommend some rich man, who stands in need of management and

protection; and help a third to be employed in some public work, or

to some gainful and profitable farm. Epaminondas bade a friend of his

go to a certain rich man, and ask him for a talent by the command of

Epaminondas, and when he to whom the message was sent came to enquire

the reason of it; Because, said Epaminondas, he is a very honest man

and poor; but you, by converting much of the city’s wealth to your own

use, are become rich. And Xenophon reports, that Agesilaus delighted in

enriching his friends, himself making no account of money.

14. Now since, as Simonides says, all larks must have a crest, and

every eminent office in a commonweal brings enmities and dissensions,

it is not a little convenient for a statesman to be forewarned also

of his comportment in these rencounters. Many therefore commend

Themistocles and Aristides, who, when they were to go forth on an

embassy or to command together the army, laid down their enmity at

the confines of the city, taking it up again after their return. Some

again are highly pleased with the action of Cretinas the Magnesian. He,

having for his rival in the government one Hermias, a man not powerful

and rich, but ambitious and high-spirited, when the Mithridatic war

came on, seeing the city in danger, desired Hermias either to take the

government upon himself and manage the affairs whilst he retired, or,

if he would have him take the command of the army, to depart himself

immediately, lest they should through their ambitious contention

destroy the city. The proposal pleased Hermias, who, saying that

Cretinas was a better soldier than himself, did with his wife and

children quit the city. Cretinas then escorted him as he went forth,

furnishing him out of his own estate with all such things as are more

useful to those that fly from home than to those that are besieged; and

excellently defending the city, unexpectedly preserved it, being at

the point to be destroyed. For if it is generous and proceeding from a

magnanimous spirit to cry out,

Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 5 (of 5) · 第 80 / 183 题