Mr. HUBERT. In any case his reaction was such——

Mr. SENATOR. It was pretty well—you know, disturbed as I was and as

disturbed as I have seen many friends of mine, it was worse with him

than it was with the others who I have seen.

Mr. HUBERT. That is exactly what I was getting at. So he got hold

of this newspaper ad and read it again—is that it—that is, in the

coffeeshop?

Mr. SENATOR. Yes; he looked it over again.

Mr. HUBERT. What comment did he make, while reading it or after?

Mr. SENATOR. While reading it?

Mr. HUBERT. I don’t mean his words, you understand, his exact words,

but the meaning, the thoughts expressed.

Mr. SENATOR. Yes; the thoughts. He can’t understand it. It is so

penetrated in his mind he can’t understand why somebody would want to

do something like this.

Mr. HUBERT. The ad had nothing to do with killing the President?

Mr. SENATOR. No; but he couldn’t understand why an ad like this should

break out, about this ad. Another thing he couldn’t understand why in

the world would they want to impeach Justice Earl Warren. Incidentally,

that sign come out of Massachusetts, that billboard.

Mr. HUBERT. Was it your impression that Ruby was putting the three

instances together as being connected in some way; to wit: the death of

the President, the impeach Earl Warren sign, and the Weissman ad? Was

he seeming to do that?

Mr. SENATOR. He was seeming to do at that time—he was seeming to do

with the impeachment of Earl Warren, and the Weissman sign; he couldn’t

understand why these things were of a nature—I don’t know how long this

billboard has been out. I don’t know if it has been a day, two, or what

it was, and then the ad break out the same day that President Kennedy

was coming in. He wanted to know the whys.

Mr. HUBERT. In other words, as I understand you, you gathered that was

running through his mind, was why the ad, and the poster, appeared at

the same time as the visit of the President; is that correct?

Mr. SENATOR. I would probably say it is something of that nature, I

guess.

Mr. HUBERT. I want to distinguish that, if possible, from another

situation, and that is whether or not you gathered that he was disposed

to place the killing of the President together with the poster and the

ad.

Mr. SENATOR. Run that again.

Mr. HUBERT. From what you could gather from his attitude, from what

he said and how he acted, do you think it was running through his

mind that there was a connection between the Earl Warren poster,

the Weissman ad, and the killing of the President rather than the

President’s visit?

Mr. SENATOR. No; I would say the subject at that time, when he was

looking at the sign and taking pictures of it, and the newspaper ad,

that this is where he really wanted to know the whys or why these

things had to be out. He is trying to combine these two together, which

I did hear him say, “This is the work of the John Birch Society or the

Communist Party or maybe a combination of both.”

Mr. HUBERT. What is the work of those two; the death of the President?

Mr. SENATOR. Oh, no, no, no.

Mr. HUBERT. The publication of these signs?

Mr. SENATOR. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. He did not indicate what his impressions were as to who was

behind the death of the President?

Mr. SENATOR. No; he didn’t indicate that.

Mr. HUBERT. Nor did he seem to associate the ads and the poster with

the President’s death?

Mr. SENATOR. I don’t know about that part.

Mr. HUBERT. But you do know that he was wondering why these two things,

the poster and ad, should come out at the same time?

Mr. SENATOR. Now, mind you, I don’t know if they come out at the same

time, because the billboard, I don’t know if that thing was there a day

or a week.

Mr. HUBERT. But he was associating the two of those together?

Mr. SENATOR. Yes.

Mr. HUBERT. Or trying to find out if there was any connection between

those two?

Mr. SENATOR. Yes; he wanted to know why.

Mr. HUBERT. And it was the fact that the ad was published and the sign

was posted that he attributed to the Communists or the Birch Society.

Mr. SENATOR. Yes; and he couldn’t understand why the Dallas Morning

News would ever print such a thing like that, say that in their paper.

Mr. HUBERT. You see what I am trying to get at is whether he manifested

in any way that his thinking associated the assassination of the

President with the posting of the Warren poster and publication of

the ad, or rather whether he was simply associating the fact of the

publication of the ad and the posting of the poster with communism, and

so forth.

Mr. SENATOR. To my belief I think he was trying to associate the ad and

the poster with the Communist Party or the John Birch Society.

Mr. HUBERT. You did not gather from what he said that he associated the

death of the President to the Birch Society or the Communists or any

other group?

Mr. SENATOR. Not at the time that we were talking; rather, he was

talking about the signs.

Mr. HUBERT. That is, the poster and the ad?

Mr. SENATOR. The poster and the ad.

Mr. HUBERT. Had you all talked to anybody else in the coffeehouse, in

the coffeeshop?

Mr. SENATOR. No. I don’t think there was anybody in there at that time

outside of, I think, a cashier and probably a waitress.

Mr. HUBERT. Do you recall whether he made any comment to the cashier or

the waitress?

Mr. SENATOR. No; I don’t.

Mr. HUBERT. Did Larry have any comment to make that you recall?

Mr. SENATOR. I just don’t remember if he had any or not.

Mr. HUBERT. Well, now, when Ruby stated what you said he stated

concerning the poster, and so forth, did you have any comment to make

about it?

Mr. SENATOR. Well, nothing compared to him. Of course, after I heard

him mention it, then I sort of wondered also why an ad like that would

be put in the paper, or why anybody would want to impeach Justice Earl

Warren. What did it mean?

Mr. HUBERT. Jack had taken the pictures and he had gone to the post

office to check on the box. Did he state what he intended to do further?

Mr. SENATOR. No.

Mr. HUBERT. Then you tried to calm him down?

Mr. SENATOR. No.

Mr. HUBERT. Was it your impression that his state was that he should be

spoken to by a friend and calmed down?

Mr. SENATOR. Well, I don’t know. It is hard for me to say these things.

Who would really know?

Mr. HUBERT. But in any case you didn’t argue with him about his view?

Mr. SENATOR. No. I don’t argue with him at any time.

Mr. HUBERT. You did not state a concurring view, I take it?

Mr. SENATOR. No.

Mr. HUBERT. Or an opposing view?

Mr. SENATOR. No.

Mr. HUBERT. Nor did Larry?

Mr. SENATOR. Larry I can’t speak for because I just don’t remember.

Mr. HUBERT. And you don’t remember whether Ruby spoke to anybody else

or anyone else spoke to him?

Mr. SENATOR. Not to my knowledge.

Mr. HUBERT. Then what did you all do next?

Mr. GRIFFIN. Before you go on, did Jack indicate what he was going to

do with the photographs that he took?

Mr. SENATOR. No. He just took them and he never said what he was going

to do with them. Of course, I know what the windup was with them later

on.

Mr. GRIFFIN. What was that?

Mr. SENATOR. Well, I believe the local policemen got them after the

shooting when they searched him, took his money and his papers, and all

of that, and I believe those pictures were with it.

Warren Commission (14 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIV (of 15) · 第 95 / 309 题