“A medical gentleman of great experience at Boston, in Lincolnshire,

and who is considerably advanced in life, has frequently observed to

me, that intermittents are so much diminished in his circuit, that an

ounce of the cinchona goes further at this time in the treatment of

agues than a pound of it did within his own recollection. During his

father’s practice at Boston, they were still more obstinate and

severe. For my own part, I have declared, for several years, in

various companies, that marsh miasmata are the cause of both agues and

the rot. And as miasmata are admitted, by the concurring testimonies

of medical practitioners in every part of the globe, to be produced by

the action of the sun upon low, swampy grounds, I hope this

interesting subject will be fully investigated, and effectual plans

carried into execution, for the preservation of man, and of the

animals which are so useful to him.”

I may here mention a circumstance which occurred at the Poor Law

Commission Office, and which with succeeding information tended to

direct our attention to the subject of sanitary measures of prevention

for the protection of the rates. A medical officer of one of the Unions

who came to town for the transaction of some business before the Board,

begged to be favoured by the immediate despatch of his business,

inasmuch as, from a change of weather which had taken place since his

departure, he was certain that he should have a number of cases waiting

for him. On being asked to explain the circumstances from which he

inferred the occurrence of disease with so much certainty, he stated

that within his district there was a reservoir to feed a canal: that

they had let out the water as they were accustomed to do in spring time

for the purpose of cleansing it; and that whenever such weather occurred

as then prevailed during the process, he was sure to have a great number

of fever cases amongst the labourers in the village which immediately

adjoined the reservoir. It appeared to be, in fact, a case in which the

rot was propagated amongst the labourers in the village under

circumstances similar to those before cited in which it was propagated

amongst the sheep.

The following portions of evidence afford instances of the condition in

which a larger proportion of the country remains, from the neglect of

general land drainage, than would be conceived from any _à priori_

estimate of the amount of prevalent intelligence and enterprize.

_Mr. R. W. Martyr_, one of the medical officers of the Langport union,

thus describes the condition of a large proportion of his district:—

“The parishes of Kingsbury and Long Sutton being the district No. 1 B

of the Langford union, the population of which amounts to above 3,000;

Kingsbury, containing 2,000; and Long Sutton 1,000, or thereabouts.

Both these parishes are partly surrounded by low meadow land, and are

liable to frequent inundations, often covering many thousand acres,

and sometimes to a great depth; the level of much of this land being

below the bed of the main river or drains, makes it very difficult

(when once inundated) in very wet seasons to drain or carry off the

immense body of water they often contain.

“These inundations are caused by the banks of the main rivers not

being sufficiently strong or elevated, and from the bridges not being

capacious enough to carry the immense body of water brought down from

the neighbouring hills and country higher up, which, in heavy rains,

sometimes takes place so rapidly as to completely overflow the banks

in twenty-four hours; but besides the casual or accidental giving way

of the banks of the rivers, it is sometimes done by interested persons

for the purpose of warding off the mischief from themselves by

throwing it on their neighbours.

“When these floods occur in the winter season, and there is but little

herbage, or early in the spring, and are followed by dry weather, the

surface of the ground becomes dry and healthy, and they are then

highly beneficial to the land, and but little prejudicial to the

health of the surrounding inhabitants; but when, as is sometimes the

case, these floods take place late in April, May and June, and cover

hundreds of acres of hay, some cut and some uncut, and which must of

course rot on the ground, the effluvia and stench is then often

unbearable, and highly prejudicial to the health of the neighbouring

villages, and it is sometimes years before the land recovers its

healthy state, producing nothing but rank herbage, and causing agues,

fevers, dysentery, and numerous other diseases. Many of these evils

may, I think, be remedied if the owners of large estates in this

neighbourhood would interest themselves in the matter: I am persuaded

the increased value of their property would amply repay the outlay

necessary for the purpose. When the land is in this unhealthy state,

it appears to be equally prejudicial to the animal as the human

subject, producing numerous diseases among cattle, particularly among

sheep, many farmers losing the whole of their flocks.

“Although much remains to be done to remedy the mischief complained

of, yet a considerable improvement has taken place within the last

twenty years by enclosing many of the large commons, and by that means

partially draining them; and also by enlarging the back drains which

carry the water to a lower level into the main river, by which means

it is carried off much sooner, and less mischief is done, than if it

remained longer on the surface of the land.

“It is stated in a very old history of Somerset, that about 300 years

ago, nearly the whole of the inhabitants of Kingsbury, Muchelney, and

Long Load, were carried off by a pestilence (without doubt meaning a

malignant fever); and that for many years afterwards it was considered

so unhealthy that it was inhabited solely by outlaws, and persons of

the worst character, a clear proof the country is in a much healthier

state now than it was in former times.

“In addition to the more general causes of disease arising from the

flat state of the country, and its liability to inundations, are many

others of a more local character, and much easier of removal, in the

village of Kingsbury; and in many others there are numerous pits or

ponds in the winter season filled with muddy water, and, in summer,

mud alone: these are often situated in the front or at the back of the

cottages, and are receptacles for all manner of filth, and in certain

seasons are productive of very serious diseases, and at all times

highly injurious to health. Besides the mud pits above mentioned,

there is scarcely a cottage that is not surrounded with all manner of

filth, oftentimes close to the doors of the inhabitants, very few of

the cottages being provided with privies, or if there be any, they

only add to the general nuisance from being open and without drains.”

_Mr. Oldham_, the medical officer of the Chesterfield union, gives the

following account of his district:—

“Wessington is situated upon an elevation, but the houses are arranged

around a green or unenclosed common, upon the surface of which are a

great number of small pools, which, for the most part, are stagnant.

In the winter season they overflow, and at this season the

neighbourhood appears less infected with fever. In the summer months,

and greater part of the spring and autumn, they are stagnant, and

undoubtedly a fruitful source of malaria; indeed the neighbourhood of

Wessington is scarcely ever free from fever at these seasons of the

year.

“It perhaps may not be amiss to mention, I have attended a number of

persons in the neighbourhood of this common who have been attacked

with fever, who were at the same time well fed, and lived in

comfortable and tolerably well-ventilated houses.”

He then adduces instances, and proceeds—

“From the facts before mentioned, I am led to conclude that the

decomposition constantly going on in these small pools is the source

of the malaria, and that the malaria so engendered propagates fever.

1st. Because there are cases of fever in this locality nearly all the

year. 2d. Because paupers, and persons who are better fed, and live in

more comfortable and better ventilated houses in the neighbourhood of

this green or common, are attacked with the disease, and, I may say,

almost indiscriminately. 3d. Because during the years I have attended

the paupers of the district, there has scarcely been a case of fever

in the winter season when the pools are overflowed, and the atmosphere

is colder, and consequently unfavourable to fermentation and

decomposition. In my opinion the only method to remedy this evil would

be to drain the common, which is small, and its situation being

elevated, would greatly facilitate its drainage. The condition of a

few of the smaller and more confined of the tenements might be greatly

improved.”

_Mr. L. Reynolds_, one of the medical officers of the Dore union, thus

describes in his report the district where some fever cases occurred:—

“Of those cases the six first have occurred on Colston Common, a small

marshy spot, never drained, and containing several pools extremely

unhealthy, from decaying vegetables that never are removed. This year

the same families have been again attacked, and shall be so every year

till that nuisance be removed. In a medical point of view, such

commons are injurious, and they are extremely expensive to the unions,

for they cause fever, asthma, and rheumatism, from their incipient

moisture, thus injuring the labouring classes, and heavily taxing the

parish.

“The four next have occurred at a place called Toad Ditch: it well

deserves the name; it is a collection of badly-built houses, rendered

unhealthy from the large ditch, into which every kind of refuse is

poured; the removal of that nuisance is imperatively called for. All

these houses have one privy in common, but the ditch is the place

generally used.

“This district would be much served by enclosing and draining Colston

Commons, by keeping the sewers at Kingston clean, and by draining the

ditch at Toad Ditch. These are the only removable nuisances of which I

have any knowledge.”

_Mr. Blick_, medical officer of the Bicester union, describes the

prevalence of typhus:—

“This disease has been very prevalent in this district during the past

year, indeed we are never free from it. I think its origin may be

traced, in most instances, to a constant exposure to an atmosphere

loaded with malaria, and propagated, in the second place, by

contagion, so little attention being paid to prevent its diffusion.

“The malaria alluded to arises from the decomposition of vegetable

matter left upon Otmoor (a marsh of about 4000 acres), by the previous

winter’s flood, and acted upon by the sun, &c., during the summer.”

_Mr. J. Holt_, the medical officer of the Leighton Buzzard union,

reports:—

“I have had only 34 cases of remittent and intermittent fevers during

the last year, which is a small number in comparison to the amount

usually occurring in hot summers. The great prevalence of these fevers

at such times is attributable principally to the number of stagnant

ponds and ditches which are situated in the very midst of many of the

towns and villages of this union, and which, in hot weather, become

quite putrid and offensive from the quantity of decaying animal and

vegetable matter. I have generally observed that the greater number of

these fevers occur in houses situated in the immediate vicinity of

these ponds, and have no doubt is the chief cause of nearly all the

fevers of this description. The villages to which I more particularly

refer are Egginton, Eddlesbon, Cheddington, &c.”

The sanitary effects of road cleansing, to which house drainage and road

drainage is auxiliary, it appears is not confined to the streets in

towns and the roads in villages, but extends over the roads at a

distance from habitations on which there is traffic. Dr. Harrison, whose

testimony has been cited on the subject of the analogy of the diseases

of animals to those which affect the human constitution, in treating of

the prevention of fever or the rot amongst sheep, warns the shepherd

that, if after providing drained pasture and avoiding “rotting-places”

in the fields, all his care may be frustrated if he do not avoid, with

equal care, leading the sheep over wet and miry roads with stagnant

ditches, which are as pernicious as the places in the fields designated

as “rotting-places.” He is solicitous to impress the fact that the rot,

_i. e._ the typhus fever, has been contracted in ten minutes, that sheep

can at “any time be tainted in a quarter of an hour, while the land

retains its moisture and the weather is hot and sultry.” He gives the

following instance, amongst others, of the danger of traversing badly

drained roads. “A gentleman removed 90 sheep from a considerable

distance to his own residence. On coming near to a bridge, which is

thrown over the Barling’s river, one of the drove fell into a ditch and

fractured its leg. The shepherd immediately took it in his arms to a

neighbouring house, and set the limb. During this time, which did not

occupy more than one hour, the remainder were left to graze in the

ditches and lane. The flock were then driven home, and a month

afterwards the other sheep joined its companions. The shepherd soon

discovered that all had contracted the rot, except the lame sheep; and

as they were never separated on any other occasion, it is reasonable to

conclude that the disorder was acquired by feeding in the road and ditch

bottoms.” The precautions applicable to the sheep and cattle will be

deemed equally applicable to the labouring population who traverse such

roads.

Such instances as the following, on the prejudicial effects of undrained

and neglected roads, might be multiplied. _Mr. E. P. Turner_, the

medical officer of Foleshill union, in accounting for some cases of

fever, states:—

“These cases of typhus all occurred in the same neighbourhood, where

the road is bad and a dirty ditch of stagnant water on each side of

it; the road is generally overflowed in the winter. The disease broke

out in the month of October; other cases occurred in the same

neighbourhood at the time.”

The nature of the more common impediments which stand in the way of the

removal of the causes of disease and obstacles to production described

in the preceding, are noticed in the instances following. Others will be

adduced when the subject of the legislative means of prevention are

stated.

_Dr. Traves_, on the sanitary condition of the poor in the Malton union,

states,—

“The whole of the low district above alluded to, and extending into

the Pickering union, (known by the name of the Marishes, or Marshes,)

has at different times within the last few years been the seat of

typhus and other fevers.

“Attempts were made by some of the landed proprietors a few years ago

to effect a system of drainage and embankments likely to prevent the

inundations of these rivers in wet seasons, but the attempt was

abandoned in consequence of the reluctance of certain townships to

bear their portion of the necessary outlay, and any partial system of

embankment is positively injurious, inasmuch as the water that is let

in upon the land at a higher point of the river is prevented returning

into the stream again by an embankment at a lower point, so that this

water, containing vegetable matters in a state of decomposition, must

remain stagnant until evaporated by the sun’s rays, or dissipated by

the wind; cases of fever occurring under these circumstances have

repeatedly come under my observation, as well as that of other medical

men familiar with the district, and this fruitful source of disease

(in seasons like 1839 more especially) will probably now remain in

full force until an Act of the legislature shall effect a change.”

_Mr. Thomas Marjoribanks_, the minister of Lochmaben,—

“No means of any consequence, so far as I am aware, have yet been

tried to remedy the evil, the removal of such substances as generate

malaria. There are no scavengers appointed for the removal of

nuisances. One great mean of preventing the generation of malaria (in

my opinion) would be the lowering of the bed of the river Annan, which

would to a great extent free the surrounding lands of stagnant water,

give greater facilities for draining, improve the system of farming,

lessen the risk of damage, and increase the quantity as well as

improve the quality of the food which the low lands produce, and in

every way conduce to the comfort and cleanliness of the inhabitants.

It is computed that in consequence of the flooding of the Annan,

damage during the last four years has been done to the amount of

6,000_l._, and this along only about three miles of its course. The

property is very much subdivided, and, in consequence, poverty and

want has increased to a great extent among the small proprietors.”

In closing this exposition of the state of the chief external evils that

affect the sanitary condition of the labouring population, it may be

observed that the experience, on which the conclusions rest as to the

principles of prevention is neither recent nor confined to this country.

That which is new, is the advantages we possess beyond other times, and

perhaps beyond all other countries, in capital and practical science for

its application. The experience of the advantage of public sewers to the

health of a town population is nearly as old as Rome itself. I may refer

with M. Du Châtelet to the experience of that city, to illustrate the

consequences of neglects, such as are manifest amidst large masses of

the community throughout the country, and are partially displayed in the

mortuary registers first cited. He gives the details from the treatise

_De Adventitiis Romani Cœli Qualitatibus_, by the celebrated Italian

physician Lancisi, who deeply studied the sanitary condition of Rome,

and wrote several admirable works on the subject, which had the happy

effect of inducing the pope to cleanse and drain the city:—

“The barbarians of every tribe having several times pillaged and

sacked the city of Rome, the aqueducts were destroyed, and the water,

spreading into the surrounding plains, formed marshes, which

contributed greatly to render uninhabitable the surrounding country.

“The aqueducts existing no longer, the sewers and privies were alike

neglected, and produced serious and frequent sicknesses, which were

more effectual in destroying the population than the arms of the

barbarians. All the historians of these remote times, and particularly

St. Gregory, in his Homilies, and the deacon John, in the Life of that

saint, give a frightful picture of the city of Rome. The air became so

vitiated that plagues and fevers of a malignant character continually

carried on their ravages to such a point that Peter Damien, writing in

the eleventh century to Pope Nicholas II., to intreat him to accept

his resignation, alleged as the pretext the danger he ran every

instant of losing his life by remaining in the town.

“It was principally during the abode of the popes at Avignon that all

which regards health was neglected at Rome, and some historians have

not hesitated to attribute to this negligence the depopulation of the

town, which was reduced in a little time to 30,000 inhabitants.

“Things remained in this state to the end of the fourteenth century,

an epoch at which the popes, resuming the ancient labours, restored

things to their proper condition; a new title to glory of Leo X., who

of all the popes was the one who occupied himself with this important

object in the most especial manner.

“It is, in part, to these precautions that we are to attribute the

rapid increase of the population of Rome, which, from 30,000 souls,

reached in a short time to 80,000; and it is a thing worthy of our

attention that after the death of this pontiff the population quickly

fell to the number of 32,000, because, according to the contemporary

authors, everything having been neglected, the first calamities were

renewed.

“Happily for Rome this state of things did not continue long, because

all successive popes, instructed, it appears, by the experience of

ancient times, having carried on immense labours, and constructed

fresh sewers, have given to the air of this city the necessary

purity.”

Italy presents instances, though comparatively modern, of the removal of

disease by land drainage:—

“At Vareggio,” observes M. Villermé, “in the principality of Lucca,

the inhabitants, few in number, barbarous, and miserable, were

annually, from time immemorial, attacked about the same period with

agues; but in 1741 flood-gates were constructed, which permitted the

escape into the sea of the waters from the marshes, preventing at the

same time the ingress of the ocean to these marshes both from tides

and storms. This contrivance, which permanently suppressed the marsh,

also expelled the fevers. In short, the canton of Vareggio is at the

present day one of the healthiest, most industrious, and richest on

the coast of Tuscany; and a part of those families whose boorish

ancestors sunk under the epidemics of the _aria cativa_, without

knowledge to protect themselves, enjoy a health, a vigour, a

longevity, and a moral character unknown to their ancestors.”

The histories of other cities, and particularly of Paris, afford

illustrations of the effects of the neglect of public cleansing, which

begin in the ignorance and carelessness of the superior officers, and

continue in the predominance of ignorance and obscure interests of a

multitude in the present day:—

“For several years the suppression of an enormous cesspool at Paris

near the Barrière des Fourneaux was implored by the inhabitants.

Placed under the predominant winds, it was a permanent cause of

annoyance to the quarters of St. Germain and St. Jacques. But all

petitions were in vain. A singular occurrence brought about the event

for which the people had prayed more than 50 years. In a hunting

party, the Prince of Conde was carried by a fiery horse towards this

same cesspool; finding it impossible to turn the animal, the prince

had the presence of mind to throw himself on the ground, but the horse

darted forward into the cesspool and disappeared. The next day an

order was issued from Versailles, enjoining M. Lenoir, the lieutenant

of police, to fill up the cesspool, which was accordingly done.”

A particular evil had attracted the attention of an able minister, who

had recourse to the expedient which we have seen recently re-discovered

and introduced into practice into one section of the sewerage of

London:—

“The great sewer of Montmartre being uncovered, and the fall

exceedingly small, it was easily choked, and spread infection through

all the neighbourhood. Turgot thought that the best method to obtain a

ready flow for the muddy waters it received was to wash it by frequent

currents. A vast reservoir, capable of containing about 22,000

measures of water, was in consequence established at the opening of

the sewer, opposite the Rue des Filles-du-Calvaire. The waters of

Belleville were conducted there, together with those of two wells dug

in the vicinity. This volume of water was, on certain days, let into

the main sewer by means of flood-gates, which could be opened at

pleasure. The scouring of the sewer by a current of living water

attracted the public attention, and produced the most happy results.

Shortly the people could dwell on the confines of this ancient ditch

without fear of dangerous exhalations. The quarters of the Faubourg

Montmartre, of the Chaussée-d’Antin, of the Ville-l’Evêque, and of the

Faubourg St. Honoré, became populated. At length the land was so

valuable in these different quarters that the possessors of the banks

of the sewer demanded and obtained the permission to cover it over at

their own expense.”

The mode of cleansing had, however, been before proposed by another

minister:—

Report to Her Majesty's Principal Secretary of State For the Home Department, from the Poor Law Commissioners, on an Inquiry Into the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain; With Appendices · 第 14 / 65 段