MARK ANTONY LOWER.

Lewes, Feb. 2.

_Sparse_.--Permit me to refer your correspondent "C. FORBES" for a reply

to his query, p. 215. of your last Number, to the article "Americanism"

in the _Penny Cyclopædia_, the author of which observes:--

"_Sparse_ is, for any thing we know, a new word, and well applied;

the Americans say a _sparse_ instead of a scattered population; and

we think the term has a more precise meaning than scattered, and is

the proper correlative of _dense_."

In the _Imperial Dictionary_ (avowedly based upon Webster's American

work, which I cannot at this moment refer to in its original form), the

word in question is given both as an adjective and as a verb, and the

derivatives "sparsed," "sparsedly," "sparsely," and "sparseness," are

also admitted. The reference given for the origin of "sparse" is to the

Latin "_sparsus_, scattered, from _spargo_;" and the definitions are, 1.

"Thinly scattered, set or planted here and there; as, a _sparse_

population:" and, 2., as a botanical term, "not opposite, not alternate,

nor in any regular order; applied to branches, leaves, peduncles, &c."

Notes and Queries, Number 16, February 16, 1850 · 第 66 / 100 题