DUCROW AT SADLER'S WELLS.

When, in a melo-drama, the bride is placing her foot upon the first step of

the altar, and Ruffi_aa_no tears her away, far from the grasp of her lover;

when a rich uncle in a farce dies to oblige a starving author in a garret;

when, two rivals duellise with toasting-forks; when such things are plotted

and acted in the theatre, hypercritics murmur at their improbability; but

compare them with the haps of the drama off the stage, and they become the

veriest of commonplaces. This is a world of change: the French have invaded

Algiers, British arms are doing mortal damage in the Celestial Empire,

Poulett Thomson has gone over to Canada, and oh! wonder of wonders!

Astley's has removed to Sadler's Wells!! The pyrotechnics of the former

have gone on a visit to the hydraulics of the latter, the red fire of

Astley's has come in contact with the real water of the Wells, yet, marvel

superlative! the unnatural meeting has been successful--there has not been

a single _hiss_.

What was the use of Sir Hugh Middleton bringing the New River to a "head,"

or of King Jamie buying shares in the speculation on purpose to supply

Sadler's Wells with real water, if it is to be drained off from under the

stage to make way for horses? Shade of Dibdin! ghost of Grimaldi! what

would you have said in your day? To be sure ye were guilty of pony races:

they took place _outside_ the theatre, but within the walls, in the very

_cella_ of the aquatic temple, till now, never! We wonder ye do not rise up

and "pluck bright Honner from the vasty deep" of his own tank.

Sawdust at Sadler's Wells! What next, Mr. Merriman?

[Illustration: A JUDGE GOING THE CIRCUIT.]

If Macready had been engaged for Clown, and set down to sing "hot codlins;"

were Palmerston "secured" for Pierrot, or Lord Monteagle for Jim Crow, who

would have wondered? But to saddle "The Wells" with horses--profanity

unparalleled!

Spitefully predicting failure from this terrible declension of the drama,

we went, in a mood intensely ill-natured, to witness how the "Horse of the

Pyrenees" would behave himself at Sadler's Wells. From the piece so called

we anticipated no amusement; we thought the regular company would make but

sorry equestrians, and, like the King of Westphalia's hussars, would prove

totally inefficient, from not being habituated to mount on horseback.

Happily we were mistaken; nothing could possibly _go_ better than both the

animals and the piece. The actors acquitted themselves manfully, even

including the horses. The mysterious Arab threw no damp over the

performances, for he was personated by Mr. Dry. The little Saracen was

performed so well by _le petit Ducrow_, that we longed to see _more_ of

him. The desperate battle fought by about sixteen supernumeraries at the

pass of Castle Moura, was quite as sanguinary as ever: the combats were

perfection--the glory of the red fire was nowise dimmed! It was magic, yes,

it _was_ magic! Mr. Widdicomb was there!!

Thinking of magic and Mr. Widdicomb (of whom dark hints of identification

with the wandering Jew have been dropped--who, _we know_, taught Prince

George of Denmark horsemanship--who is mentioned by Addison in the

"Spectator," by Dr. Johnson in the "Rambler," and helped to put out each of

the three fires that have happened at Astley's during the last two

centuries), brought by these considerations to a train of mind highly

susceptible of supernatural agency, we visited--

Punch, or the London Charivari. Volume 1, July 31, 1841 · 第 71 / 76 题