57 – i. e. Gratian.

58 – The sense is here to be elicited probably by repeating

the word ‘quod,’ so that the sentence should run, ‘dogma

nescio quod, quod Apollinaris asseritur.’

59 – There seems to be something corrupt in the text. Perhaps

we should read ‘moventur,’ ‘the dangerous parts of

Illyricum are in commotion;’ or ‘suspecta’ has taken the

place of some word, such as ‘superiora,’ which would stand

in antithesis to ‘maritima.’

60 – It may complete the subject of this series of letters

to remind the reader that about the same time that the

Council of the Italian Bishops was held, Theodosius

convened a second Council at Constantinople to deal

with the questions raised by the Westerns, where most of

the Bishops who had formed the previous General Council

re-assembled. They replied to the invitation to another

General Council at Rome by a Synodical letter, which is

given at full length by Theodoret (Eccles. Hist. v. 9.).

In it they excuse themselves from attending, on the ground

of their presence being required in their own Dioceses,

especially after the long exile of many of them, and the

prevalence of Arian usurpation, wishing that they ‘had

the wings of a dove,’ to fly to their Western brethren.

They then give a summary of the doctrinal decisions of

the two Councils, and announce that they have sent three

Bishops as deputies to explain all things more fully to

them, and, with reference to the disputed successions at

Constantinople and Antioch, give their assurance to their

brethren that both Nectarius and Flavian were canonically

elected, and the elections ratified both by the clergy

and the faithful of each diocese, and by the Council,

reminding them of the ancient Canon re-affirmed at Nicæa

that each province should settle all such questions for

themselves.

61 – Acholius, or Ascholius, as he is called by Socrates, was

the Bishop who baptised Theodosius, during an illness

which seized him on a campaign against the Goths. He was

present at the Council of Constantinople, and afterwards

at that of Rome, not as one of the deputies from the

East, but probably because his see had been so recently

transferred to the Eastern Empire, that he might seem to

belong to both East and West. (Tillemont Ambr. ch. xxxi.)

It was there that he met S. Ambrose, who had gone to Rome

to attend the Council, and had fallen ill. His death must

have occurred in A.D. 383, for his successor Anysius was

Bishop before the death of Damasus, Bishop of Rome, who

died in A.D. 384. Theodoret therefore (B. v. ch. 18.) must

be wrong in making him the Bishop who wrote to S. Ambrose

an account of the massacre at Thessalonica, which occurred

in A.D. 390. But the passage of Theodoret occurs in only

one MS., and is perhaps not genuine.

62 – The Goths had been settled within the boundaries of the

Empire by Valens in A.D. 376, when they implored his

protection against the Huns. He established them in Moesia,

where they soon revolted, and ravaged Thrace, uniting

with their former enemies, the Huns, and other barbarians.

Valens was defeated and slain by them in A.D. 378, and

then they overran all the neighbouring provinces. There is

a graphic account in Gibbon, ch. xxvi.

63 – The Benedictine text here reads ‘claudebatur.’ Several MSS.,

as the editors mention in a note, have ‘claudebat.’ They

themselves suggest ‘claudicabat.’ But ‘claudebat’ really

gives the same meaning, and there seems little doubt that

it is the true reading. It comes from claudeo or claudo,

(for both forms are to be found,) meaning ‘to be lame,’

‘to halt.’ It occurs three times in Cicero.

64 – ‘fisco vel arcæ.’ The ‘fiscus,’ or imperial treasury,

received whatever was assigned to the Emperor individually,

as distinguished from the ‘aerarium,’ which received what

belonged to the senate, as representing the old republica:

‘arca’ is sometimes used in late writers as equivalent to

‘fiscus,’ sometimes, when distinguished from it, as here,

it signifies the city funds, which were distinct from both.

65 – Julian’s edict, forbidding the Christians to teach in

the schools of grammar and rhetoric, is mentioned with

disapproval by Gibbon ch. xxiii.

The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan · 第 255 / 340 题