THE END.

Footnotes.

1 – The word in the original is Sacerdos. It is constantly

used by S. Ambrose and other writers of his time for

Bishops, though they sometimes add a qualifying epithet,

‘Summus Sacerdos.’ But even alone it is used where the

writer is clearly speaking of Bishops, and of Bishops

quâ Bishops. Thus it occurs frequently in the Proceedings

of the Council of Aquileia, which is itself styled

‘Sacerdotale Concilium.’ See the Article ‘Bishop’ by Mr.

Haddan in Dict. of Chr. Ant. Vol. 1 p. 210 b., who refers

also to Bp. Taylor, Episc. Assert. § 27. It has therefore

been rendered ‘Bishop’ throughout this volume, wherever

it is plain that the reference is to Bishops, and ‘Priest’

wherever it is used in a more general way.

2 – This forms the two first books of the ‘De Fide’ still

extant among the works of S. Ambrose. The other three

books were added afterwards, as S. Ambrose explains at the

beginning of Bk. iii, to maintain his statements against

the attacks of heretical teachers. The Treatise, ‘De

Spiritu Sancto,’ in 3 books, was sent afterwards in

381 A.D.

3 – Nivei. This is the reading all MSS. Ed. Rom. has ‘vivi,’

which would agree better with the text of S. John.

4 – The Benedictine reference for the first of these texts

is Prov. xiv. 3. _The lips of the wise shall preserve

them_, with which the Sept. and Vulg. agree. In the second

the English Vers. has _The lips of the wise disperse

knowledge_. Here S. Ambr. agrees with the Sept.

5 – Forum Cornelii was on the Via Æmilia, about 23 miles S.E.

of Bononia. It was at this time in the Province Æmilia.

The modern name is Imola.

6 – The Benedictine Editors refer this to the ravages of the

Goths after Valens’ defeat at Hadrianople A.D. 375. It is

on this that they found the date of the letter, but the

reference is somewhat vague.

The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan · 第 242 / 340 题