AMBROSE TO ROMULUS.

Sidenote: Exod. xxxii. 2.

1. THERE is no doubt that letter-writing was invented that we might

hold a sort of converse with the absent, but this becomes more

excellent in use and example when frequent and pleasant colloquies

pass between a parent and his sons, whereby is really produced a sort

of image of actual presence, even though they are separate in body; for

by such offices love attains its growth, just as it is augmented by our

mutual letters between ourselves. All this I begin to experience much

more abundantly in these last addresses of your affection, wherein you

have thought fit to ask me with what intent Aaron took the gold from

the people when they required gods to be made them, and why the head

of a calf was fashioned with that gold, and why Moses was so deeply

incensed that he commanded every man to rise upon his neighbour and

slay him with the sword. For it is a great thing that the absent should

suffer no loss either of kindness or of the liberal communication

of mutual knowledge. My sentiments on this point, therefore, as you

require it, I will offer for the purpose rather of comparison than of

instruction.

2. While Moses was receiving the Law on Mount Sinai the people were

with Aaron the Priest. Prone as they were to transgress, we do not find

that they committed sacrilege so long as the Law was being delivered,

but when the Divine Voice ceased, sin overtook them, so that they

required gods to be made them. Aaron, thus constrained, asked for their

rings and the women’s earrings, which, when given to him, he cast into

the fire, and the head of a calf was molten of them.

Sidenote: Gen. xxxv. 2.

Sidenote: Exod. xxxii. 2.

3. We can neither excuse this great priest, nor dare we condemn him.

It was not however unadvisedly that he deprived the Jews of their rings

and earrings; for they who designed sacrilege could have neither the

seal of faith nor ornaments of their ears. The patriarch Jacob too hid

the earrings along with the images of the strange gods, when he hid

them in Shechem, that no one might come to know of the superstitions

of the Gentiles. And he said well, _Break off the golden earrings

which are in the ears of your wives_; not as leaving the men their

earrings, but in order to shew that they had them not. Fitly also are

the earrings taken from the women, that Eve may not again hear the

voice of the serpent.

Sidenote: 1 Kings xii. 30.

4. Because they had listened to sacrilegious counsel, an image of

sacrilege was formed by the melting of their earrings; for he who hears

amiss is wont to perpetrate sacrilege. Why the head of a calf came

forth, the sequel shews, for it was signified thereby, either that in

time to come Jeroboam would introduce this kind of sacrilege, and that

the people of the Hebrews should worship golden calves; or else that

all unbelief bears the semblance of brutal and savage folly.

Sidenote: Ps. xxix. 5, 6.

5. Moses, incensed by this unworthy act, broke the tables, and ground

the head of the calf to powder, that he might abolish all traces of

their impiety. The first Tables were broken in order to the restoration

of the second, whereby, through the preaching of the Gospel, unbelief

was broken to pieces, and done away. And thus Moses brought down this

Egyptian pride, and repressed this self-exalting arrogance, by the

authority of the eternal Law. Wherefore David also says, _The Lord

shall break the cedars of Libanus, and shall reduce them to pieces,

as a calf of Libanus_.

Sidenote: Isa. xxv. 8.

Sidenote: 1 Cor. xv. 54, 55.

Sidenote: Ps. cx. 7.

Sidenote: S. John xix. 30.

6. The people drank up all their perfidy and pride, that impiety and

arrogance might not drink them up. For it is better that every one

should prevail over the flesh and its vices, that it may not be said

that _prevailing[278] death hath swallowed him up_, but rather, _Death

is swallowed up in victory; O death, where is thy sting, O grave, where

is thy victory?_ And of the Lord it is said, _He shall drink of the

brook in the way_; for He received the vinegar, that He might drink up

the temptations of all men.

Sidenote: Exod. xxxii. 26, 27.

7. But in his causing every man to slay his neighbour, the parents

their children, the brother his brother, we find an evident precept

that religion is to be preferred to friendship, piety to kindred. For

that is true piety which prefers divine things to human, eternal to

temporal. Wherefore also Moses himself said to the sons of Levi, _Who

is on the Lord’s side, let him come to me. And he said unto them, Thus

saith the Lord God of Israel, Put every man his sword by his side, and

go throughout the camp_, that thus, by the contemplation and love of

the Divine Majesty all human ties and affections might be destroyed.

It is written that three thousand men were slain, nor need we feel any

jealousy of the number being so great, for it is better that by the

punishment of a few the body should be exonerated, than that vengeance

should be taken on all; nor indeed does any punishment of wrong against

God appear too severe.

Sidenote: Num. xviii. 6.

Sidenote: 1 Cor. ix. 27.

Sidenote: Heb. iv. 12.

8. Again, the ministry of the Levites, whose portion is God, was chosen

for this work, as being more holy than the others: for they know not

how to spare their own who know nothing of their own, for to the holy

God is everything. Now he is the true Levite and punisher and avenger,

who kills the flesh that he may preserve the spirit, such as he was who

says, _I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection_. And who are

such close neighbours as the flesh and the soul? What is so akin to us

as the passions of the body? These the good Levite slays within himself

with that spiritual _sword_ which is _the word of God, sharp and

powerful_.

Sidenote: S. Luke ii. 35.

9. There is also a sword of the Spirit, which pierces the soul, as was

said to Mary, _A sword shall pierce through thy own soul also, that the

thoughts of many hearts may be revealed_. Is not the flesh united with

the soul by a kind of fraternal bond? Is not discourse also related and

akin to our mind? When therefore we check our discourse, that we may

not incur the sin of much speaking, we put aside the rights of blood,

and loose the bonds of this fraternal connexion. Thus by the force

of reason the soul severs from itself its irrational and, as it were,

cognate part.

10. And so Moses taught the people to rise against their neighbours,

by whom faith was in danger of being mocked, and virtue hindered,

that whatever in us was straying from virtue, perplexed by error, or

entangled in vice might be cut off. By this direction to the people he

obtained not only a mitigation of the Divine wrath and a turning away

of offence, but even conciliated for them grace.

11. Thus, according to our apprehension, we have explained, since you

asked it, our sentiments. And do you, if you have aught preferable,

impart it to us, that from you and from ourselves we may learn which

to choose and follow.

Farewell: love me as a son, for I also love you.

The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan · 第 122 / 340 题