AMBROSE TO EUSEBIUS.

Sidenote: Gen. viii. 11.

Sidenote: Ib. 20.

Sidenote: Ib. ix. 1.

Sidenote: Ib. 9.

Sidenote: Ib. 12.

1. THE two Faustinuses are herewith restored to you, the two little

Ambroses stay with me. You have in the father what is best, in the

younger son what is most agreeable; for you have at once the summit

of virtue, and shew forth the grace of humility. I have what is

intermediate between father and younger son. With you is the head of

the whole family, and the continuous succession of a name handed down;

with me remains that frugal mean which both depends upon the head,

and has a common being with what follows it. You have him who is our

common rest, who when he comes to me in my turn, smooths all the cares

of my soul. You have him who alike by his life and works, and by his

offspring has found favour with our Lord, you have him who in the

storms of this world nourished a spiritual dove, to bring him the fruit

of peace, anointed with the oil of chastity. You have him who built

an altar to the Lord, he whom God blessed together with his sons, and

said unto them, _Be fruitful and multiply_; with whom He established

the covenant of His peace, that it might be unto _him and his sons for

perpetual generations_.

Sidenote: Ib. 20.

2. You have then one who is an heir of Divine benediction, a partner

in grace, a sharer in righteousness. But take care, I beseech you, that

this our husbandman Noah, the good planter of the fruitful vineyard,

does not become inebriated with the cup of your love and favour, as one

filled with wine, and so indulge too long in rest, and then if haply he

fall asleep the longing for our Shem awake him.

Sidenote: Ib. 23.

Sidenote: Gen. ix. 24.

Sidenote: Ps. xlv. 3.

Sidenote: Gen. ix. 27.

Sidenote: Ib. x. 1.

3. There also is Japhet the youngest of the brethren, who with pious

reverence may cover his father’s nakedness, whom his father may see

even in sleep and never dismiss from his remembrance, but keep him ever

in his sight and in his bosom, and when he wakes may know _what his

younger son has done unto him_. In Latin his name signifies ‘health,’

in that grace is spread over his lips and over his life, wherefore God

hath blessed him, because he, going backward, one may say, to Bologna,

covered his father with the pious garment of charity, and shewed honour

to piety; of whom also his father said, _God shall enlarge Japhet,

and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem_. Wherefore also in the

enumeration of this generation he is preferred to his elder brother,

he is substituted for him in the blessing: he is preferred in regard

of honour to his name, he is substituted in regard of the prerogative

of elder birth and the honour due to nature.

Sidenote: Prov. xxii. 1.

4. Now in Latin Shem signifies a ‘name.’ And truly is this Ambrose of

ours a good name, in whose tents Japhet may be enlarged, _because a

good name is rather to be chosen than great riches_. Let him therefore

also be blessed, let his name be above gold and silver, let the seed of

Abraham be in his portion, let all his blessing rest on his posterity,

and on the whole family of the just man. But no one is cursed, all are

blessed, for blessed is the fruit of Sarah.

Sidenote: Gen. ix. 26.

Sidenote: Ib. x. 9.

5. The Ambroses salute you, the beloved Parthenius salute you, so does

Valentinian, disposed to humility, which is in Hebrew ‘Canaan’, being

as it were the servant of his brother, to whom he has also given place

as regards his name. And therefore he is like Nimrod, mighty in his

double name, a great hunter upon the earth, of whom it is said; _Even

as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the Lord_. For being somewhat rude

in intellect, but of great bodily strength, he surpasses in strength

those whose genius he cannot equal; so that he would seem to carry

with him the Comacine[237] rocks, and to resemble them in his outward

appearance, being as he is somewhat like a bull, wrathful at being

set aside, at being deprived of his paternal name, at being subjected,

through an inhabitant of the capital, to one from Bologna, for he knows

not the blandishments of infancy, and sprung without suffering injury

from his nurse’s bosom.

Farewell: love me for I love you.

LETTER LVI.

A.D. 392.

A NOTE in p. 71 [Footnote #50] gives a brief outline of

the schism in the Church of Antioch up to the time of the

Council of Aquileia, which made some efforts to bring about

a settlement. Meletius was then succeeded by Flavian, so that

there still remained two rival Bishops, Flavian and Paulinus.

Another opportunity for closing the schism came at Paulinus’

death, at the end of 388 A.D., but so far from allowing the

wound to be so healed Paulinus on his death-bed consecrated

Evagrius as his successor in violation of the Canons of Nicæa,

(Theod. H.E. v. 23) which ‘do not allow a Bishop to appoint

his successor, but require all the Bishops of the province to

be summoned to elect, and forbid consecration without at least

three consecrating Bishops.’ The western Bishops therefore

continued to press Theodosius to call a Council to deal with

the matter, which was accordingly assembled at Capua. Flavian,

though ordered by the Emperor, did not appear, and the

Council referred the question to the decision of Theophilus

of Alexandria and the Bishops of Egypt who were not committed

to either side, and in this letter S. Ambrose replies to

Theophilus who had written to him that Flavian still refused

to submit himself to their decision and again appealed to

the Emperor, and urges him to summon Flavian once more, and

endeavour to bring the matter to a peaceful issue, advising

him to consult also Siricius, the Bishop of Rome. He points

out that both parties rely rather on the weakness of their

opponent’s case than on the soundness of their own, and

expresses a hope that an end may be put to the schism, and

peace restored to the Church. Tillemont, in note 41 on the

Life of S. Ambrose, discusses the date of the Synod of Capua,

and fixes it at the end of A.D. 391, chiefly on the ground

that Theodosius did not return to Constantinople from Milan

till November of that year, while it must have been held

before the disturbance in the west occasioned by the revolt of

Arbogastes and the death of Valentinian, which took place in

the spring of A.D. 392.

The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan · 第 109 / 340 题