66. AMBROSE, Bishop, said; ‘Do you call Him very Lord?’

Secundianus said; ‘I call Him the very only-begotten Son of God. Who

denies that He is the very Son of God?’

Eusebius, Bishop, said; ‘It is not enough that you confess Him to be

the only-begotten Son of God, for all confess this. But what influences

us is that Arius said that the Father alone is Lord, alone is true, and

denied that the Son of God is very Lord. Do you confess simply that the

Son of God is very God?’

Sidenote: S. John i. 18.

Secundianus said; ‘Who Arius was, I know not; what he said, I know not.

You speak with me, living man with living man. I say what Christ said:

_The only begotten Son Which is in the bosom of the Father_. Therefore

He asserts Himself to be the only-begotten Son of the Father: the

only-begotten Son is then the very Son of God.’

Sidenote: Isa. lxv. 16.

67. AMBROSE, Bishop, said; “Is the very Son of God also very God? It

is written in the divine books: _he that sweareth on the earth, shall

swear by the true God_, and that this applies to Christ there is no

doubt. We therefore profess the true God, and this is our faith and

profession, that the only-begotten Son of the Father is very God. Do

you then say ‘of very God,’ and then that the Son is very God.”

Secundianus said; ‘Of very God.’

The Letters of S. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan · 第 55 / 340 题