II

Etruria, the country of the Etruscans in Italy, was, I suppose, a very

different place from Etruria, the small town between Hanley and Burslem

("Hanbridge" and "Bursley") where Josiah Wedgwood founded his pottery

in the eighteenth century, but the spirit which produced the Etruscan

ceramics was not dissimilar from the spirit which produces the famous

Wedgwood ware; and I thought to myself as I looked at the romantic name

of that grimy-looking town in Staffordshire that I had stumbled on the

secret of Mr. Bennett. Underneath the plain appearance of the pottery

town, there is a spirit which has persisted in the production of

beautiful things for the best part of two centuries, a spirit so much

in love with delicate ware that it calls an unsightly town by the name

of an ancient and reputedly beautiful one; and underneath the hard and

fact-ridden style of Mr. Bennett there is an ineradicable desire for

romance. I said of him once that he fights the battles of the romantic

with the weapons of the realist, and that description seems to me to be

strictly accurate. Mr. Bennett mingles, even in his Christian names,

the gritty and the graceful in a way that is singularly characteristic

of the people of his district. "Enoch Arnold Bennett" is a combination

of names not easily imagined, but it is not more unusual than the

combination of Etruria and Staffordshire, of lovely ceramics and "the

Five Towns." Mr. Bennett has many times been charged with addiction

to dusty realism, a dull love of facts. His critics say of him, after

reading such a book as "Your United States," that he must have spent

his time on the liner in which he went to America in counting the

rivets in her plates for the sheer love of counting them, and they

conclude that he is a materialist because of his interest in numbers

and in things. They even complain of him that he is infatuated with

largeness, just as Queen Victoria was, and that he imagines a thing

to be good when it is merely big. This is undiscerning criticism.

It is as if a child were charged with being a disciple of Haeckel

because it thinks that ten things are more wonderful than one thing.

We may think that Mr. Bennett is a fact-ridden modern, incapable of

romance, because he inordinately admires electricity, but to do so is

to announce ourselves as dunderheads for not discovering that his love

of electricity is the Romantic's love of the Magic Lamp! How easily

most of us are dissuaded from our faith in romantic things! We are

in ecstasies when we hear of St. Francis of Assisi preaching to the

fishes and the birds and addressing them as little brothers, but we

are horribly shocked and humiliated when Mr. Bernard Shaw makes the

mad priest in "John Bull's Other Island" speak of a pig as our little

brother! There is prettiness in the community of men and birds, even

of men and the smaller fish, but pigs--PORK!! We find romance in the

spectacle of a man rubbing a dirty lantern with his fingers in order

to summon up a serving genie, but cannot perceive the greater romance

found by Mr. Bennett in the spectacle of a man pressing a switch and

illuminating a room with power drawn by wires from a station many

miles away! We are enchanted with the thought of transport on Magic

Carpets, but unmoved by the thought that presently great ships will be

guided into New York Harbour, not by pilots, but by means of wireless

telegraphy! Some dullards have exclaimed despairingly of Mr. Bennett

because of what they called his trivial and commonplace interests as

revealed in that enthralling book, "Things That Have Interested Me,"

failing utterly to discern that it is his interest in these things

which is so infallible a sign of his zest for life. Any one can be

interested in the Rocky Mountains, but it is only a superbly romantic

man who can be absorbed in Tarrytown. There is not anything in the

round world, made by God or by man, which does not interest Mr.

Bennett. Familiarity breeds contempt in most of us, but it does not

breed contempt in him. _He never gets used to things._ Most of us are

too dull of mind, too destitute of imagination to feel interest or

astonishment unless we are abruptly confronted with the unusual or the

violent, and our capacity for romantic enjoyment is limited and soon

exhausted. We would exclaim with astonishment on beholding an eruption

of Mount Vesuvius for the first time, but we would exclaim rather less

on perceiving the ninety-ninth eruption. Mr. Bennett would experience

as much excitement on the ninety-ninth occasion as he would on the

first. Nothing less than an earthquake is necessary to stir some of

us, but Mr. Bennett can be stirred by the sight of a taxicab. The

genesis of "The Old Wives' Tale," as described in the preface to one of

the later editions, is a clear illustration of his romantic possession:

In the autumn of 1903 [he writes], I used to dine frequently in a

restaurant in the Rue de Clichy, Paris. Here were, among others,

two waitresses that attracted my attention. One was a beautiful,

pale young girl, to whom I never spoke, for she was employed far

away from the table I affected. The other, a stout, middle-aged,

managing Breton woman, had sole command over my table and me, and

gradually she began to assume such a maternal tone towards me

that I saw I should be compelled to leave that restaurant. If I

was absent for a couple of nights running she would reproach me

sharply: "What! you are unfaithful to me?" Once when I complained

about some French beans, she informed me roundly that "French

beans were a subject which I did not understand...."

I break the quotation here to exclaim at the obtuseness of that Breton

woman who, in the course of her management of Mr. Bennett, failed

to discover that he loves to regard himself as an authority on such

matters as French beans. There is a kind of romantic pride which makes

some men believe that they know the one place in a city where the best

brand of a particular article is to be purchased. Mr. Bennett has that

pride. The heaviness of the Breton's blow to it can be imagined after

reading the next sentence in the passage from which I am making the

quotation:

I then decided to be eternally unfaithful to her, and I abandoned

the restaurant. A few nights before the final parting an old

woman came into the restaurant to dine. She was fat, shapeless,

ugly and grotesque. She had a ridiculous voice and ridiculous

gestures. It was easy to see that she lived alone, and that in

the long lapse of years she had developed the kind of peculiarity

which induces guffaws among the thoughtless. She was burdened with

a lot of small parcels which she kept dropping. She chose one

seat; and then, not liking it, chose another; and then another.

In a few moments she had the whole restaurant laughing at her.

That my middle-aged Breton should laugh was indifferent to me,

but I was pained to see a coarse grimace of giggling on the pale

face of the beautiful young waitress to whom I had never spoken.

I reflected, concerning the grotesque diner: This woman was

once young, slim, perhaps beautiful; certainly free from these

ridiculous mannerisms. Very probably she is unconscious of her

singularities. Her case is a tragedy. One ought to be able to

make a heartrending novel out of the history of a woman such as

she. Every stout, ageing woman is not grotesque--far from it!--but

there is an extreme pathos in the mere fact that every stout,

ageing woman was once a young girl with the unique charm of youth

in her form and movements and in her mind. And the fact that the

change from the young girl to the stout, ageing woman is made up

of an infinite number of infinitesimal changes, each unperceived

by her, only intensifies the pathos. It was at that instant that

I was visited by the idea of writing the book which ultimately

became "The Old Wives' Tale." ...

Some Impressions of My Elders · 第 31 / 75 题