The implications of this hypothesis must be considered. It is
attractive because it establishes an essential difference between men
and women which makes them complementary to each other. There can be
no question of absolute domination of one sex by the other when the
strength of each lies in a different direction. If man’s energy is
diverted more into conscious life, woman’s energy is diverted more into
unconscious life, and one is not more important than the other. It is
a relative, not an absolute difference; both men and women are human
beings, and all that concerns human beings is their joint affair. But
it means, as will be seen, a difference in the kind of creative work
done by each: they will tackle the same things from a different point
of view, and with different results. On this basis men and women would
each have an equal right, the right of the creative spirit to do its
work without let or hindrance.
Conscious life implies rational thinking. In thinking about things
we arrange them in patterns, we give them form and system. But we do
not give them content; conscious life modifies or seizes upon things
which it does not originate. Growth is a process which is already
well advanced before it enters consciousness at all. Our patterns of
thought, therefore, can never be final: they must from time to time be
broken and re-formed to admit new factors pushed into consciousness.
But the existence of thought-patterns makes it easier to recognise the
significance of new factors, since a thought, once formulated, can be
passed on, and becomes a permanent heritage for the human race, part of
the body of knowledge established by the processes of consciousness.
These processes are continuously at work extending the body of
knowledge, systematising thought, and endeavouring to systematise life.
Consciousness is thus the shaper of form, which is one aspect of life,
and its work tends to a permanence beyond the vicissitudes of living.
But its vitality depends upon its communion with the unconscious.
Obviously, unconscious life cannot be clearly defined. We can only
guess at its nature from the angle at which its processes enter
consciousness, from its disruptive action upon our systems of
thought, and from what we can remember of its manifestations in
dreams. We know that our emotions rise from it like bubbles through
water, that it determines our motives and our interests, and that it
is not homogeneous by conscious standards. Its interferences with
our conscious life are always spontaneous and strongly charged with
feeling. We can infer from such interferences that it has purposes.
From its manifestations in dreams and trance states we know that it
has access to knowledge by other than conscious means. This kind of
knowledge, when it makes its way into consciousness, we sometimes
recognise by its emotional force and unexpectedness, and call it
intuition. But for the most part we serve the purposes of our
unconscious without knowing that we do so, and admit its wisdom only
through the indirect channels of conscious rationalisation.
The processes of the unconscious can, however, be roughly described by
contrast with the conscious life. The unconscious is concerned with
growth rather than form; it is essentially emotional, spontaneous,
and irrational. As far as we know, it is concrete in its thinking and
not abstract; it creates living agents and not systems of thought.
Thus, while conscious processes supply form and permanence in our
world, unconscious processes supply growing vitality and change. The
creations of unconscious life are wrought in mortal substances, those
of conscious life in enduring patterns which are one step removed from
life. Unconscious life creates, for example, human beings: conscious
life creates, for example, philosophy. If men are stronger in conscious
life, and women in unconscious life, their creative powers must
express their strength. Men should excel in translating life into
conscious forms, women in fostering the growth of life itself. Men will
create systems of philosophy or government, while women are creating
individual human beings.