M. “Oh no, E. doesn’t tell stories.”

C. “Yes, she does. When I say yes she says no, and I know that I am

right.”

He talked of this same experience of feminine frailty to others,

remarking to one of his lady friends that E. had not said a sensible

thing all the week he was staying with her. He also attacked his father

on the subject, and after illustrating her odd way of contradicting

others, he observed: “She’s are never as sensible as he’s, I suppose,

are they, papa? especially if a boy is older”.

The father asked him if he had shown his displeasure to his girl

playmate, to which he replied: “I didn’t show my angriness;” and after a

pause: “I’d better not show how angry I can be, I’m too strong and too

big, ain’t I?” As a matter of fact he had once, at least, been so

ungallant as to strike his companion on her nose with one of his toys,

selecting this objective for his attack apparently for no other reason

than that it was already disfigured by a scratch. He wound up this

disquisition on E.’s shortcomings by an attempt at a magnanimous

allowance for her weakness: “I b’lieve she tries not to say these things

because she knows they will tease me, but I think she can’t help it;”

and he repeated this as if to emphasise the point.

Even our much-biassed chronicler is obliged to own that all this is a

lamentable exhibition of boyish swagger, and particularly out of place

in one born in these enlightened days, when, as we all know, ‘she’s’ are

as good as ‘he’s,’ if not a great deal better. The only palliation of

the unpleasant picture of coxcombry which he offers is the information

that a year or too later C.’s views about girls were profoundly modified

when he found himself in a school where a girl of his own age could beat

him at certain things of the mind.

The growing vigour of his self-consciousness was shown in other ways

too. He was much hurt by anything which seemed to him an invasion of his

liberty. About the end of the sixth month, we read, he had got into

‘finicking’ ways of taking his food. Thus he conceived a strong dislike

for the ‘cream’ on his boiled milk. If anybody attempted to cross him in

these faddish ways he would be greatly offended. It looks as if he were

at this time getting a keen sense of private rights, any interference

with which he regarded as an offence.

The story about what he would do if his family were ship-wrecked

suggests that self-sacrifice was as yet not a strong element in the

boy’s moral constitution. Egoism, it might well seem, was still the

foundation of his character. This egoism would peep out now and again in

his talk. One day (middle of eighth month) when the family was lodging

in a cottage his mother had reason to scold him for walking on the

flower-beds in the cottage garden. Whereupon he answered: “It isn’t your

garden, it’s Mr. G.’s”. To this the mother observed: “I know, dear, but

I have to be all the more particular because it is not mine”; which

observation drew forth the following: “I should think Mr. G. would be

all the more particular because it is his”. It was evident, writes the

father, from this somewhat cynical observation that caring for things

and resenting any injury to them seemed to C. to devolve on the owner

and on nobody else.

He himself certainly did repel any encroachment on his rights. Here is

an amusing illustration. One day (the end of seventh month) he was

playing on the Heath under the eye of his mother. He had put on one of

the seats a lot of grass and sand as fodder for his wooden horse. While

he went away for a minute a strange nurse and children arrived, making a

perfectly legitimate use of the bench by seating themselves on it, and

in order to get room brushing away the precious result of his foraging

expedition. On coming back and seeing what had happened he turned to his

mother and swelling with indignation exclaimed loudly: “What do you mean

by it, letting these children move away my things?” Of course this was

intended to intimidate the real culprits, the children. Finding that

they were not abashed at this, but on the contrary were looking at one

another with a look of high-bred astonishment, he turned to them and

shouted: “What do you mean by it?” This outburst, observes the father,

showed a preternatural heat of indignation, for in general he was very

distant and reserved towards strange children.

Yet C. was very far from being wholly absorbed in himself and his own

interests. It cannot be said indeed that self monopolised the intensest

of his feelings, for he felt just as strongly for others too. There was,

we are told, a marked development of sympathy during this year. His

sister was now away from home at school, and the absence seems to have

drawn out kindly feeling. So that when, on one occasion (middle of

seventh month), his father and aunt were going to visit her, and to take

her to the Crystal Palace, though he wanted dreadfully to go himself, he

made a great effort, and in answer to his father’s question, what

message he had for his sister, answered a little tremulously, “Give her

my love,” and then, waxing more valiant, added, “I hope she will enjoy

herself at Crystal Palace”.

Some months later (end of ninth month), he proved himself considerate

for his father, whose repugnance to noises has already been alluded to.

A man had come to repair a window and his father had been forced to stop

his work and to go out. On his return C. met him in the garden and asked

him loudly, evidently so that the man might hear, “Does that man disturb

you, papa?” He had previously talked to his mother in an indignant way

about the noises which disturbed his father. About a fortnight after

this, on hearing some children make an uproar in the passage, he asked

indignantly, “What are those children about, making papa not do his

work?” “He was at this time,” writes the father, “transferring some of

that chivalrous protection which he first bestowed on animals to his own

kith and kin. He became to me just at this time something of a guardian

angel.”

His compassion for the lower creation had meanwhile by no means

lessened. Here is a story which shows how the killing of animals by

human hands still tortured his young heart. One day (towards end of

fourth month) he was looking at his beloved picture-book of animals.

_Apropos_ of a picture of some seals he began a talk with his mother in

the usual way by asking her a question.

Studies of childhood · 第 18 / 58 题