The full title of Dr. Donaldson's elaborate article is _Anatomical

Observations on the Brain and Several Sense-Organs of the blind

Deaf-Mute, Laura Dewey Bridgman_. The object had in view in the

examination of the brain was "to determine, if possible, whether the

peculiar mental existence of Laura Bridgman, which was the result of

her defective sense-organs, has left any trace on her brain, or whether

such anomalies as may be observed are sufficiently explained when

considered as the direct consequences of the initial defect alone."

The article is therefore "a special study in the general field of the

inter-relation of brain-structure and intelligence." The final results

are reserved for a second article, but it appears from the present

one that the total area of Laura's brain is somewhat small for its

weight, and that it is slightly inferior to two other female brains

with which comparison was made, the inferiority depending mainly on the

smaller average depth of the sulci, that of the left side being the

most manifest. The difference can be explained in part at best, by the

failure of certain portions of the brain to develop completely. Dr.

Donaldson's article is illustrated by very carefully prepared plates.

In the present part of his sketch of the history of reflex action, Dr.

Hodge treats of the law demonstrated by Bell, that the _posterior roots

of the spinal nerves are sensory, the anterior motor_, which forms the

beginning of the modern history of the nervous system, and of "the

physical versus the psychic theory of reflex action." The mechanical

theory of reflex action was first elaborated by Marshall Hall. It was

opposed by Volkmann and others, among them Pflügel and Auerbach. On the

other hand, Lotze supported the former view, but he advanced "a step

beyond the comparatively crude, simple mechanism of Marshall Hall to a

mechanism of the utmost delicacy, a mechanism susceptible of the nicest

adjustments, capable of education, and of prolonged, independent, and

complex activity." Habit is only another name for mechanism.

Under the head of Psychiatry, Dr. William Noyes gives an elaborate

sketch of the life of Jean Jacques Rousseau bearing on the question of

his insanity, which is exciting considerable interest at the present

time. (E. C. Sanford, Clark University, Worcester, Mass.)

MIND. October, 1890. No. LX.

CONTENTS:

THE ORIGIN OF MUSIC. By _Herbert Spencer_.

MENTAL ELABORATION. By _James Sully_.

VOLKMANN'S PSYCHOLOGY (II). By _Thomas Whittaker_.

BERKELEY AS A MORAL PHILOSOPHER. By _Hugh W. Orange_.

MUENSTERBERG ON 'MUSCULAR SENSE' AND 'TIME-SENSE.' By the

_Editor_.

DISCUSSION: 1) Mr. Spencer's Derivation of Space. By _Prof. John

Watson_.

2) Dr. Pikler on the Cognition of Physical Reality. By _G. F.

Stout_.

CRITICAL NOTICES: Lewis's "A Text-Book of Mental Diseases."

Mercier's "Sanity and Insanity"; Jones's "Elements of Logic as

a Science of Propositions"; Coupland's "The Gain of Life and

other Essays."

ON THE UTILITARIAN FORMULA. By _James Sutherland_.

_The Origin of Music._ This article is intended as a postscript to Mr.

Spencer's essay on "The Origin and Function of Music," included in

his _Essays, Scientific, Political, and Speculative_, of which he is

preparing a final edition. It is a reply to Mr. Darwin, who supposes

music to have originated from a particular class of vocal noises, the

amatory class, instead of, as Mr. Spencer asserts, its being derived

from the sounds which the voice emits under excitement, eventually

gaining this or that character according to the kind of excitement.

After considering various objections by Mr. Edmund Gurney and others,

Mr. Spencer concludes: "The origin of music as the developed language

of motion seems to be no longer an inference but simply a description

of the fact."

Mr. James Sully deals with Differentiation, Assimilation, and

Association as the intellectual constituents in the process of Mental

Elaboration. Differentiation is considered first as a process of

marking off, by means of special adjustments of attention, particular

sensations; followed by Discrimination, which involves change of

psychical state, the dependence of mental life on which has been

formulated as the Law of Relativity. Assimilation, described as a

mode of unification or integration, is treated of under the headings,

_Psychological Nature of Likeness_; _Automatic Assimilation_;

_Recognition_; and _Transition to Comparative Assimilation_.

Association is the "process of psychical combination or integration

which binds together presentative elements occurring together or in

immediate succession." This supposes _Retention_ or the tendency of

a sensation to persist, and _Reproduction_, or the reappearance "in

consciousness" of the impression under a new representative form. The

three processes of Differentiation, Assimilation, and Association do

not follow each other, but are closely interconnected.

Part II. of _Volkmann's Psychology_ deals with the problem of Time and

Space, and with the subjects of Space of Time (_Zeitraum_), Motion,

Number, and Intuition. "Out of sensations intuitions are evolved in

consequence of the properties immanent in the sensations." While

their localisation progresses in the region of the more strongly

toned sensations, projection, or the "assignment of sensations to the

external world," goes on simultaneously in the region of toneless

sensations. By the addition of "consciousness of dependence in having

the sensation," there is the completion of the presentation of the

External Thing as _thing_. Illusions are divided into two classes;

namely, 'illusions of internal perception' and 'illusions of sense.'

The Ego is purely a psychical result of the soul "becoming conscious of

an interaction between one of its presentations and the most ramified

of its presentation-masses." Self-consciousness is defined as "internal

perception within the Ego." The mind is then dealt with as thinking,

feeling, desiring, and willing. Ethical feeling is a kind of æsthetic

feeling, distinguished from others by the peculiarity of its objective

basis, which is the actual will of the subject. Moral freedom is to

have the will determined by reason. Psychological freedom permanently

extended over the whole of volition is Character; its opposite is

Passion.

Mr. Orange furnishes a different explanation of Berkeley's ethical

system from that given by Professor Fraser, in a note to the third

dialogue of _Alciphron_ (ii. 107), and points out its agreement with

Berkeley's _Principles of Human Knowledge_. "Moral laws are laws of

nature; but there is no value or force in them as laws, save in so far

as they are the orderly expression of God's ideas." Man's ideas are

true or good, when the human spirit is at one with the divine. Both in

natural and moral philosophy the laws of nature are to be attained by

the use of reason.

Prof. Robertson draws attention to the concessions involved in

Münsterberg's idea of 'Muscular Sense.' To the term 'muscle-sensation'

no exception can be taken, "provided it is meant for no more than

mere external designation, as when we speak of 'eye-sensation,'

'skin-sensation,' or the like," and is not called 'sensation of

movement.' Münsterberg finds that a whole class of factors have

been overlooked, or hardly regarded, by previous inquirers into

'Time-Sense.' These are sensations (or representations) of muscular

tension, by synthesis of which with sense-elements (sounds by

preference) time-apprehension is explicable. He is struck particularly

with the part played in his experiments by the breath-rhythm, and

"it seems impossible to doubt that breathing has a prerogative

position among the sense-factors concerned in the estimation of short

time-intervals." The name 'Time-Sense' has through Münsterberg's

investigations "more justification than it ever got from its

inventors, for whom it has marked only the apparent immediacy of

time-apprehension."

In his criticism of Mr. Spencer's theory of the derivation of

space Prof. John Watson lays down as the fundamental position of

Transcendentalism, or Idealism, as he prefers to call it, "that the

universe is intelligible, and that man in virtue of his intelligence is

capable of grasping it in its essential nature. It therefore rejects

as unmeaning the doctrine of Mr. Spencer, that we know reality to be

unknowable." While recognising that Mr. Spencer and others have done

good service in drawing attention to certain outward aspects of the

evolution of mind, Professor Watson "concludes that no psychology

can be adequate which does not recognise that perception is not the

mere occurrence of transient feelings, but the first step in that

recognition of the true nature of reality which culminates in the

comprehension of the world as a single organic unity of which the

source and explanation is intelligence."

Mr. Stout points out, in reply to Dr. Pikler (_Mind_, No. 59), that the

sole aim of his article on "The Genesis of the Cognition of Physical

Reality" (_Mind_, No. 57) was to trace "the genesis of the presentation

of physical reality as it appears to the ordinary consciousness: not as

it may be modified, and perhaps rectified, by the reflective criticism

of this or that philosopher," and that what he urged against Mill was

simply that "he has confounded his own philosophical view of physical

reality with the view which men ordinarily take when they are not in a

philosophical mood."

It is shown by Mr. Sutherland that in the utilitarian ultimate

conception there is, in addition to "the greatest happiness, _plus_ an

arithmetical truth," the element of absolute justice, the existence of

which requires that "all subsidiary rights as means to greatest general

happiness should at utmost be classed under relative justice." (London:

Williams & Norgate.)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS. October, 1890. Vol. I. No. I.

CONTENTS:

THE MORALITY OF STRIFE. By _Professor Henry Sidgwick_.

THE FREEDOM OF ETHICAL FELLOWSHIP. By _Felix Adler_, Ph. D.

THE LAW OF RELATIVITY IN ETHICS. By _Professor Harald Höffding_.

THE ETHICS OF LAND TENURE. By _Professor J. B. Clark_.

THE COMMUNICATION OF MORAL IDEAS AS A FUNCTION OF AN ETHICAL

SOCIETY By _Bernard Bosanquet_, M. A.

DR. ABBOT'S "WAY OUT OF AGNOSTICISM." By _Professor Josiah Royce_.

A SERVICE OF ETHICS TO PHILOSOPHY. By _Wm. H. Salter_.

This is the first number of the _International Journal of Ethics_,

which is intended to take the place of the _Ethical Record_. In

the opening article, Professor Sidgwick affirms that the idea of a

universal and complete harmony of the earthly interests of all human

beings is "an optimistic illusion as to human relations, which in the

present age of the world has nearly faded away." Nevertheless, "a very

substantial gain would result if we could remove from men's minds

all errors of judgment as to right and wrong, good and evil, even if

we left other causes of bad conduct unchanged." What is practically

wanted is improvement in moral insight, and the aim of the paper is to

aid in the solution of certain intellectual difficulties which arise

when we try to get a clear idea of duty. Warfare among modern nations

"is normally not a mere conflict of interests, but also a conflict

of opposing views of right and justice." Disputants may therefore be

brought into harmony if they can be really and completely enlightened

as to their true rights, as distinguished from their interests. The

international law administered by arbitrators may be most useful "in

removing minor occasions of controversy and in minimising the mischief

resulting from graver conflicts," but it will not provide a settlement

of all occasions of strife. Where the sphere of arbitration ends

that of the moral method of attaining international peace begins;

"if we must be judges in our own cause, we must endeavor to be just

judges." The impartiality required is difficult, but "the judicial

function—which, in a modern state under popular government, has

become, in some degree, the business of every man"—might be performed

with success, "if national consciences could be roused to feel the

nobility and grapple practically and persistently with the difficulties

of the task."

Professor Adler's article is devoted to an account of the Ethical

Societies, which are described as being "consecrated to the knowledge

of the Good, but not to any special theory of the Good." To adopt

a philosophical formula as the basis of union would be to become a

philosophical sect, which he declares is "the most contemptible of

all sects, because the sectarian bias is most repugnant to the spirit

of genuine philosophy." The accepted norms of moral behavior form the

starting points of Ethical Societies and their basis of union. They

build on the common stock of moral judgment, which may be called the

common conscience. Ethics is both a science and an art. As a science

it has to explain the facts of the moral life, and it is necessary to

begin with the facts and to test theories by their fitness to account

for them. It is "the prime duty of every one in his individual capacity

to rise to the ever clearer apprehension of first principles," but for

this very reason Ethical Societies in their collective capacity abstain

from laying down any set of first principles as binding.

It is not quite clear how Professor Adler can declare that the Ethical

Societies are consecrated to the knowledge of the good, and yet make

so strong an opposition to their stating such knowledge in the exact

terms of a philosophical formula. Philosophy is nothing but knowledge

of the world systematised into a world-conception. It will hardly be

sufficient to make the "common conscience" the corner stone of any

society devoted to the elevation of morality. Not only would it be

difficult to ascertain what that "common conscience" at present is,

but, in addition, we can be assured that the "common conscience" is

constantly changing.

Ethics as a science means philosophical ethics; and Professor Adler's

ethics is, in fact, the expression of a philosophy. Yet in spite of the

advanced position of the Ethical Societies, which have discarded all

religious views and ceremonial practices, we find that their leader

still stands upon the ground of a dualistic extra-naturalism. Professor

Adler says:

"There is a reality other than that of the senses, and the ultimate

reality in things is, in a sense, transcending our comprehension, akin

to the moral nature of men. But how shall we acquaint ourselves with

this Supersensible. The ladder of science does not reach so far."

It is true that there are realities other than that of the senses;

take as a most simple instance mathematical points and lines. But

there is no reality which theoretically considered can not become

an object of science. The statement that there are facts to which

the ladder of science does not reach, is tantamount to a declaration

of supernaturalism and dualism. Professor Adler has discarded the

terminology of the old dogmatism, but he has not discarded its basic

error. Instead of developing the old faith into a monistic religion, he

throws away religion as a basis of ethics, but preserves carefully that

element in it which is hostile to science and philosophy.

The _Law of Relativity_ is a very important contribution by Professor

Höffding to the Science of Ethics. After stating that the moral law, if

it is to be truly universal, must "only judge the general direction of

the _tendency_ of the will," he affirms that the individual relativity

of ethics, or its personal equation, is a factor which enters into

the ethical question, "when different individuals with like ethical

principles and in like circumstances, but with different dispositions

and capacities have to be considered." The individual is always a part

of society, and the life of society is no other than that contained

in its members, the ideal being "reached only when the individual's

efforts in the cause of society also serve the free and harmonious

development of his own faculties and impulses." In an ideal State only

that would be demanded of each individual which lay within his range

and power. Self-control, as a negative virtue, is a psychological

impossibility. It is necessary to take note whether there is room for

other inclinations that could absorb the store of energy. The struggle

of self-control lasts until the new application of energy gains

complete ascendancy. The happiest man is where morality has become

organic and "there is an agreement between the task arising from the

general principles and the particular circumstances, and the capacities

and desires of the individual." Professor Höffding objects to the views

of the Italian _criminal-psychological_ school that atavism is a sign

of social imperfection, that it "does not justify placing society and

the criminal over against each other as absolute right and absolute

wrong." He concludes that it is at least an open question whether there

are any human beings "in whom no sympathy for the moral law can be

awakened, however much the law may be individualised."

The arguments of Professor Clark on _The Ethics of Land Tenure_ are

summed up in the following passage: "If a state originally owned its

land, in the fullest sense of the term, it had the right of voluntary

alienation which is inherent in such ownership. Increments of value,

present and future, are its property; in alienating them it gives

away its own. If the attainment of its ends requires that they be

transferred to others, the title of the grantees is valid. To deny to

the state the privilege of alienation is to essentially abridge its

natural rights; it is to make its ownership of the land incomplete."

In relation to what is incorrectly termed "unearned increments," it is

remarked, "if the essence of property is regarded, and not its form,

the increments of value attaching to land are not unearned by their

proprietors. In an active market land has its fair price, and this is

based partly on the future increments themselves." The loss arising

from a confiscation of land-value would fall "not merely on millions

who have titles in fee simple, but on all who have made loans on land

as security.... To every one it would come in the shape of a seizure

by the state of property invested in accordance with its own positive

invitation."

_The communication of moral ideas_, and not ideas about morality, which

are the abstract or scientific renderings of moral ideas, is considered

by Mr. Bosanquet as the proper function of an Ethical Society. The

fault of the present time is distraction, and "one great cause of this

distraction is the notion of a general duty to do good, or something

other than and apart from doing one's work well and intelligently."

The only certain way of communicating moral ideas is contagion, and

the most useful teacher of morality is "not so much a man of abstract

theory as a man of reasonable experience."

Ethics may be of service to philosophy, says Mr. Salter, in opening

up the realm of "what ought to be," beyond the realm of "what is and

happens." Moral ideas belong to the realm of unverifiable ideas, which

are believed in because of "their own intrinsic attractiveness and

authority." Ethics tells us of the law according to which men should

act, the law of justice and brotherhood; we may conclude "that whatever

may be the actual forces in the world at any time, justice and love

are rightfully supreme over them all, and that these are so interwoven

with the order of things that nothing out of harmony with them can

long stand." It is "the imperishable glory of transcendentalism in our

country that in the decay and disintegration of the ancient creed," it

sounded the high-note "that the soul can in some sense know the object

of its worship; that it need not feed on hearsay, and tradition, and

arguments, but can have vision." (Philadelphia: _International Journal

of Ethics_, 1602 Chestnut St.)

REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE. September, 1890. No. 177.

CONTENTS:

REMARQUES SUR LE PRINCIPE DE CAUSALITE. By _A. Lalande_.

PHILOSOPHES ESPAGNOLS.—J. HUARTE. By _J. M. Guardia_.

LES ORIGINES DE LA TECHNOLOGIE (_fin_). By _A. Espinas_.

UN DOCUMENT INEDIT SUR LES MANUSCRITS DE DESCARTES. By _V. Egger_.

NOTICES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES.

REVUE DES PERIODIQUES ETRANGERS.

The principle of causality belongs only to the world of sense, that

of children and of the commonality of mankind who neither reflect nor

analyse their knowledge. It represents confusedly the continuity and

inertia which are proper to the scientific stage, as colors represent

imperfectly the undulations of the ether, and sound the vibrations

of ponderable matter. To make of causality a scientific property of

things, a law of the phenomenal and mechanical world, is to affirm that

bodies preserve their color in the absence of an eye to perceive it, or

their sonorousness when no one hears them. Moreover, from a scientific

standpoint, the words sound and color lose all proper meaning; while

the principle of causality retains a sense, but then expresses a false

proposition, and one which leads us incessantly into error. Several

consequences flow from M. Lalande's conception of causality. The first

is that this law is not a rational principle, but is an _empirical_

formula, in the mathematical sense of that word. The second is that

we are thereby led to see in the idea of _efficiency_ an artificial

concept, and, as would be said by philologists, a disease of language,

instead of a mysterious "power" that emanates from one phenomenon

in order to create its effect. A third consequence is the great

simplification it leads to in the problem of induction, which requires

us merely to believe in the stability of the laws of nature, which are

only mathematical laws proved by experience. The true foundation of

induction is the universal value of mathematics, which rests finally

on the principle of identity. The degree of perfection of a science

can be measured by the quantity of mathematics it employs; and it is

this preconceived idea which has given birth to all the psycho-physical

measures that have been recently introduced into psychology.

M. Guardia's paper gives a sketch of the philosophical system laid

down in the work of the Spanish writer J. Huarte, _The Trial of the

Spirits_, with an introductory account of the author and his book,

which first appeared in 1575. Huarte is described as unique among

Spanish thinkers, and as a leading figure among natural philosophers on

account of the daring novelty of his original views and the excellence

of his method, which is that of the inductive philosophy. His doctrine

is founded on that of Galen, and he proclaims the principle that the

physical determines the moral. All his metaphysics reduce themselves

to the recognition of the action of exterior causes, which are of

inorganic nature, and of the organism which reacts to them. He thus

explains all the manifestations of life, heredity intervening as a

factor in its evolution. Huarte was less concerned, however, with

physiology and psychology, than with the amelioration of the social

state. He worked for the future by creating of psychology an organic

science of observation and experience, founded on the knowledge of

human nature, and by basing on it the art of education.

In concluding his valuable study of the _Origin of Technology_, M.

Espinas, after giving numerous examples drawn from ancient Greek

life, says: "All the technical arts of this epoch have the same

characters. They are religious, traditional, local. The myths referred

to are at first the faithful as well as the symbolic expression of

them." This mythological symbolism is "the product of a psychological

and sociological projection, that is to say, the things of art are

conceived as benevolent or angered feelings, as intelligent inventions

or combinations that are attributed to fictitious idealised men, as

exchanges that are made with them, as gifts or precepts that are

received from them, or as orders imposed by their will. They are thus

psychical operations or social products drawn from human consciousness

unknown to it which, personified, find themselves invoked by it in

order to explain to itself its own creations."

The unpublished matter referring to the manuscripts of Descartes is

contained in a copy of the 1659 edition of the _Principes_ of the

French philosopher, and consists of numerous notes in the handwriting

of its former owner Joseph de Beaumont. (Paris: Félix Alcan.)

REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE. No. 178. October, 1890.

CONTENTS:

LE DELIT POLITIQUE. By _G. Tarde_.

UNE NOUVELLE THÉORIE DE LA LIBERTÉ. By _A. Belot_.

NOTE SUR LA PHYSIOLOGIE DE L'ATTENTION. By _Ch. Féré_.

LES BASES EXPÉRIMENTALES DE LA GEOMETRIE. By _Jules Andrade_.

NOTE SUR LE PRINCIPE DE LA CAUSALITE. By _J.-J. Gourd_.

ANALYSES ET COMPTES RENDUS.

REVUE DES PERIODIQUES ETRANGERS.

The Monist, Vol. 1, 1890-1891 · 第 30 / 64 段