I am acquiring the cinema habit.

It is very restful. Each film is preceded on the screen by a certificate

showing that its morality has been guaranteed by Mr. REDFORD. I have

complete confidence in Mr. REDFORD'S sense of propriety. If, for

instance, a bedroom scene is shown and a lady is about to change her

gown, one's advance blushes are needless. That film will be arrested at

the loosing of the first hook or button. Virtue will always be plainly

triumphant and vice as plainly vanquished. Even the minor imperfections

of character will be suitably punished. When on the screen we see Daisy,

the flighty college girl, borrowing without permission her friend's hat,

gown, shoes, necklace and curls in order to make a fascinating display

before her young college man, it is certain that she will be publicly

shamed by her friends and discredited in the eyes of her lover whose

affections she seeks to win in this unmoral fashion.

On the screen we shall be sure to meet many old friends. The young

American society nuts, in square-rigged coats, spacious trousers, and

knobbly shoes, will buzz around the pretty girl like flies around a

honey-pot, clamouring for the privilege of presenting her with a

twenty-dollar bouquet of American Beauty roses. The bouquet she accepts

will be the hero's; and the other nuts will then group themselves in the

background while she registers a glad but demure smile full in the eye

of the camera.

The hero, however, loses his paternal expectations in the maelstrom of

Wall Street. Throwing off his coat--literally, because at the cinema we

are left in no doubt as to intentions--he resolves to go "out West" and

retrieve the family fortunes.

Our old friends the cow-boys meet him at the wooden shack which

represents the railway station at Waybackville, registering great glee

at the prospect of hazing a tenderfoot. We know full well that he will

eventually win their respect and high regard--probably by foiling a

dastardly plot on the part of a Mexican half-breed--and we are therefore

in no anxiety of mind when they raise the dust around his feet with

their six-shooters, toss him in a blanket or entice him on to a

meek-looking, but in reality record-busting, broncho.

In the middle of the drama we look forward to the "chases," and we are

never disappointed. Our pursued hero, attired in the picturesque

bandarilleros of shaggy mohair and the open-throated shirterino of the

West, will race through the tangled thickets of the picadoro-trees;

thunder down the crumbling banks of amontillados so steep that the

camera probably gets a crick in the neck looking up at him; ride the

foaming torrent with one hand clasping the mane of his now tamed

broncho, and the other hand triggering his shooting-iron; and eventually

fall exhausted from the horse at the very doorstep of the ranch, one

arm, pinged by a dastardly rifle-bullet, dangling helplessly by his

side. (It is, by the way, always the arm or shoulder; the cinema never

allows him to get it distressingly in the leg or in the neck.)

In the ultimate, with the wounded arm in a sling, he will tenderly

embrace the heroine through a hundred feet of film, she meanwhile

registering great joy and trustfulness, until the scene slowly darkens

into blackness, and the screen suddenly announces that the next item on

the programme will be No. 7, Exclusive to the Picturedrome.

We are greatly favoured with "exclusives." It may be possible that other

suburbs have these films, but it must be second-hand, after we have

finished with them. The names of the artistes who create the _roles_ are

announced on the screen: "_Captain Jack Reckless_--Mr. Courcy van

Highball," or it maybe "_Juliet_, Miss Mamie Euffles." Or it is a film

taken at the local regatta or athletic sports, and the actors in it

include all the notabilities of the district. We flock to see how we (or

our neighbours) look on the screen, and enjoy a hearty laugh when the

scullers of "The Laburnums" register a crab full in the eye of the

camera, or "The Oleanders" canoe receives a plenteous backwash from a

river-steamer.

But the staple fare is drama--red-blooded drama, where one is never in

doubt as to who is in love with whom, and how much. Sometimes, to be

frank, there is a passing flirtation, due to pique, between a wife and a

third party, leading to misunderstandings, complications and blank

despair on the part of the husband; but as there is always a "little

one" somewhere in the background, we are never anxious as to the final

outcome. It will end with the husband embracing the repentant (but

stainless) wife, and at the same time extending a manly hand of

reconciliation to the third party.

We also like the dying fiddler (with visions) and the motor-car

splurges--especially the latter. In our daily life we are plagued with

motor-cars, cycle-cars and motor-cycle side-cars, being on a highroad

from London town to the country; but on the screen we adore them.

The cinema is very restful. There are no problems to vex the moral

judgment; no psychological doubts; no anxieties. It will be "the mixture

as before," ending in the loving, lingering kiss.

Say what you will of Mr. REDFORD, he never deprives us of the kiss.

* * * * *

[Illustration: _Gladys_ (_who has been told she may see her convalescent

Daddy, but fails to recognise him with ten days' growth of beard_).

"Mummy, Mummy, Daddy's not there; but there's a burglarer in his bed."]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 146, March 18, 1914 · 第 25 / 33 题