BY JOHN BASCOM, D. D., LL. D.

[Formerly President University of Wisconsin.]

A striking feature of the industrial world and one well fitted to

occasion alarm is the large number of persons thrown, from time to

time, out of employment. We are forced by it to accept one or other of

two conclusions; that the economic world is mismade, incapable of a

quiet and successful run, or that our handling of it has been in some

way unskillful and misapplied. This fact of unemployment has become

very conspicuous, and to those who suffer from it, and to those who

sympathize with them, exceedingly grevious. A certain portion of the

human family, and that in the most progressive nations, find

themselves superfluous, out of connection with the means of living

though others are obtaining support, comfort and luxury. They have

nothing to do but to die in their tracks. Like the feeble ones in a

forced march through an enemy’s country they first fall behind and

then perish. This state of the case does not arise by accident and

then pass away, it has periods of severity which frequently return,

and stands among those constant dangers which may at any time overtake

a few. This evil comes especially to industrious countries, like

England, and to portions of our own country, like Pittsburg, noted for

their enlarged production. The causes and remedies of this state of

things become, therefore, subjects of anxious inquiry. We may assert

that the want of employment is due in a general way, to the

deficiencies and vices of men, but this assertion does not

sufficiently point out the immediate occasion of the difficulty, nor

furnish us its remedies.

Failure of the means of livelihood arises from indolence, ignorance, 385

vice and unfavorable conditions on the part of those who suffer from

it, conditions often of the nature of accident. But while the

recipients of this disaster are plainly recognized, the disaster

itself comes to them in a measure independent of their failures. We

need to know not only those who are likely to suffer from a given

disease, but how the disease itself arises. The central and most

productive cause in this series of provocations is indolence; the

others accompany indolence and more or less arise from it. By

indolence we mean a want of life and hence a weakness of all the

functions of life. We may mean physical inactivity or intellectual

sluggishness or moral indifference, or may mean them all blended in

one or other of the various ways in which a weak and perverted life

manifests itself. The tramp is physically indolent, he hates work.

This indolence readily extends to intellectual activity; the indolent

person is ignorant of the value of success, of its motives and of its

means. The world reveals few incentives to him and makes few appeals.

This indolence and ignorance do not wholly arrest the wants and

desires of men, and hence vice, as in the case of the thief, enters as

the most ready and immediate means of gratification. The torpid nature

of the moral judgment lends itself to this result, and nothing but

fear, itself weak and vacillating, stands between the indolent man and

habits of gross indulgence, inconsistent with personal and with social

welfare.

The accidents, misjudgments and disappointments which are liable to

overtake us all owe the injury which they inflict to the weak

personality on which they fall, and so misfortune seems to follow and

persecute those who are least able to bear it. The indolent, passive

mood is a good medium for the accumulation and transfer of every form

of disaster. The class of the helpless is much enlarged by this flow 386

of every form of evil to these low places in conduct and character.

We may clearly recognize these facts and suppose them a sufficient

explanation of the farther fact, that so many are thrown out of

employment and find themselves the waifs of society with no secure

attachment to it. They do, indeed, make conspicuous the failure of

occupation and determine the direction it will take. Their numbers are

seriously increased by it, and their very presence gives the

conditions of its recurrence. They are both causes and effects. They

stand on terms of action and reaction with all the embarrassments of

production. They help to reduce wages, and when wages are reduced,

they are the first to be driven out of employment. They are the

symptoms of the disease, the product of the disease and the means by

which it is carried farther. All failures in the productive process

extend, in their worst results, to this class of defectives. They are

the recipients of past evils, of present and of coming evils. They

arise in connection with a false form of production, must be treated

with it and removed with it. They are a composite product, their

faults not being wholly their own but in part the faults of the

economic system with which they are associated. They are not the

scapegoat on whose head the sins of the people may be laid and then be

borne into the wilderness.

In discussing the causes and remedies of unemployment, we shall see

how far and in what way these feeblest workers are involved in it. We

cannot improve society by simply striking off the evils that have been

developed under it. Healthy growth alone can rid itself of failures.

It often happens in physical disease that what is accepted as a remedy

in the end aggravates the difficulty.

One dislikes to use the word pauper, it so frequently carries with it

an unreasonable and cruel contempt. Yet there are paupers in the human

household, and when the temper is once present it is most difficult of

removal. It is a form of leprosy that eats out all vital power. The 387

pauper temper indicates a disposition to secure immediate ease with no

reference to the comfort of others. It accepts any advantage that

offers without the slightest wish to return it. Yet even this spirit

may offer some excuses for itself. The evils of society which may have

originated far off in the action of the leaders of men, are apt to go

booming downward till they reach, in their most distinctive form, the

pauper class, or those but little above it. Diligence, thrift, skill,

ward off the blow and escape with only a partial loss. Those who are

always in the way of it are the weak ones, to whom prosperity brings

but little and adversity occasions immediate overthrow. When those who

at best are but partially occupied, find that labor is altogether

failing them, the question of relief becomes most difficult. There is

no profitable labor at disposal, and to provide labor means farther

loss; it is charity in its most disguised, expensive and unrequited

form. The worst lesson we can teach those already inclined to

negligence is that a form of labor may be put in the place of real

labor, and that the question of adequacy is one to be answered by

society, not by the needy, recipient of favor. Whatever we may do for

men of feeble productive power we are not to lead them still farther

on in the direction of indolence and worthlessness. Actions are not to

be separated from their normal results. We may frequently be called on

to bear the injury which proceeds from another man’s wrongs, but we

are never called on to disguise the wrong itself. A portion of the

wrong is our own; that we should correct. While the evils are in the

process of infliction we are to bear them sympathetically, but not in

a form which disguises their true character.

Something of the same danger inheres in old-age pensions. Workmen of

usual diligence should receive a return for their labor which would

enable them to provide for age. As long as workmen, reaching the age 388

of three score, generally become dependent on the public, it is

perfectly plain that their wages are too low, that the returns of

production are not fairly distributed. A pension acknowledges the

evil, but does not remove it, it tends rather to confirm it. That the

losses which accompany industrial accidents should be divided between

workmen, managers and the community at large is plainly just, and is

no temptation to remissness. The accident is not the fault of any one

person or class of persons. If it falls upon a large number, it is

more readily borne and increases the motives to care. Our machinery is

operated for the benefit of the entire community, and it is only fair

that the entire community should help to bear the increased dangers.

That injuries should be still left with the workmen on whom they have

accidentally fallen is another proof of the slight hold they have on

the public mind.

Any remedy for the lack of employment which is prompted simply by

compassion and still leaves the evil to overtake the workman is not

social hygiene; is not a recognition of the partiality and

disproportion which still inhere in our productive methods. Labor

should be successful and rewardful when left to its own development.

It is bad to create a pauper temper and most difficult to contend with

it when it has once been called out. Men should be subject to their

own incentives of hope and fear, success and failure, as far as

possible. The same discipline which comes to the active, is the

natural spring of action in the sluggish. Any compassion which reduces

the motives of effort that should come to the entire community, or

which leaves the community satisfied with a maladjustment of duties,

can never provide an adequate correction of bad distribution. We are

placed between a narrow and a wide humanity, between an immediate

reduction of suffering and a removing of its conditions. The final

result is the test of our wisdom and good will.

There are partial remedies of the failure of employment which are 389

fitted to give relief without endangering the future or disturbing the

general conditions of employment. Occupations especially irregular,

like that of the stevedore, may receive especial attention, or may be

united to other forms of labor so as to secure greater uniformity. In

these occupations the employer may frequently have but little motive

to correct an evil from which he prospers by reduced wages. Excess and

deficiency in the various branches of work should be made, as far as

possible, to correct each other. Workmen are often not in a position

to meet successfully these evils. They accept the drift of the labor

market with small power to control it.

Bureaus of intelligence should be established so that the variable

demands for labor of different localities may be quickly met. This is

a public service, and should have the ease and certainty of such

service. The same reasons which lead the Government to take the

direction of immigrants should lead it to render similar aid to

workmen. Workmen are often ignorant of the extent and character of the

employment offered in the distance, and are subject to the exactions

which arise in connection with this want of knowledge. The greater

one’s want the more difficult is the change of locality. Quickness of

response demands both intelligence and nobility.

Savings banks and insurance, while not directly affecting the demand

for labor, tend to equalize and reduce the losses which accompany

variability. They also tend strongly to call out that forecast of evil

and preparation for it which belong to thoughtfulness. The strokes of

fortune lose something of their unexpected and injurious character,

and men are put on voluntary and better terms with the world.

We are not, however, to look on these reductions of danger as covering

the whole problem. Life has its accidents and we can greatly reduce

the evil results of them by patience and prudence, but there still 390

remains the more thoroughgoing effort by which the evil is anticipated

and turned aside.

There should be that general harmony of effort, that proportion of its

several parts to each other, that recognition of the common welfare,

which fortify us against disaster, and force it in the background when

it comes. There is a wise method in production, and a just relation of

its agents to each other, which should greatly reduce the liability of

a want of labor, and should ultimately remove it altogether. A true

democracy should be exempt from this general failure in the results of

activity. Much of our political economy has rested on inferences drawn

from a faulty state of society, as if it and the conclusions contained

in it expressed the real laws of our being. Society, in its most

civilized forms, has always developed a proletariat, it has suffered

drainage, and we have come to think this a sort of necessity, a

natural result of social growth. With this starting point and

expectation we are ready for periods of unemployment, and look at the

misery which arises from them as a corrective. Superfluous lives

cannot be gotten rid of on cheaper terms. We might as well suppose

that disease is an inevitable attachment of physical life and must be

left to go with it. Society never has too many workers, and when they

are not wanted it is because they have been in some way misdirected.

Strong men, industrious and intelligent men, are the wealth of

society. There is never a time in which there is little or nothing to

do in the world; if we think so it is because we cannot see, or see

falsely. Our intelligence determines what is to be done and our

diligence performs it. The world is never deficient in occasions for

labor, no matter how defective we may be in performing it. Nor is

well-devised labor wanting in its returns; intelligence and diligence,

in full exercise, always contradict the notion. The world could not be

the home of man on any other terms. Human life begins to be superfluous 391

the moment labor miscarries, and the miscarriage sinks down to those

who have the least intelligence and industry. The constitutional

disease of society, that which it has propagated with most show of

knowledge, is ignorance and indolence. When we reach this stratum we

are always in difficulty; the more in difficulty because we come to it

in a sluggish rather than in a corrective temper.

Incident to indolence and ignorance are those vices of temper by which

we wish to reach results without labor, or to reach them by the labor

of others rather than by our own labor. As long as these vices are

prevalent among men, whether in the upper or the lower strata of

society, or, as is sure to be the case, in both, periods of arrest

will come. Men will be baffled in their narrow aims, and will have no

broader, more generous ones to put in their place. For a time they

will lie idle till the customary impulses revive and once more set

them in action. Industrial inactivity is like a financial panic. It is

the result of the transient suspension of habitual feelings, and does

not relax till men return to their usual frame of mind. These

distrustful and apprehensive periods are liable to return as long as

men are not pursuing sound purposes in a sober way. Any deficiency in

fairness, integrity and mutual confidence divides society against

itself, and renders a portion of its efforts futile. This is the more

true as the division and subdivision of labor increases, and the final

adjustment of returns is made by complicated exchanges. When a portion

of the community finds its share of good things much reduced, when in

the distribution of the rewards of labor, custom or cunning or force

has robbed them of a reasonable portion, the motives of labor are

greatly lessened, the means of exchange are lessened and the sense of

unity and integrity of society is lost. There is in civilized society

a large body of just and honest production which goes far to sustain

the mind in renewed effort, and keep firm the ties which bind men 392

together. Yet the element of distrust, as in a financial crisis,

extends through the community and weakens the points of life.

The first condition of social, economic strength is that all the

members of society shall find suitable occupation and by means of it

become the givers and receivers of aid. This plain, simple fact has

been much obscured by accepting competition, often in an unethical and

unsocial form, as the general law of economic activity. This law it is

not; and it needs at all times to be held in check by ethical impulses

and by the welfare of the community. It is this welfare which is the

supreme law. Labor owes much of its degradation to a rigid and

unreasonable application of competition. As we go down in the scale of

occupations, and in efficiency in those occupations, the greater is

the injustice and injury that attend on competition till we reach a

point at which large numbers are pressed by it to the very verge of

life. Then comes in that mischievous generalization which tends to

make human degradation a permanent product of nature. The increase of

human life is said to be geometrical, the increase of the means of

life arithmetical, and so the two tendencies grind eternally against

each other. Our best sympathy is expressed in letting this collision

come to the quickest, shortest results. Some of this crushing process

obtains between ill-trained and sluggish, well-trained and active men.

Let it have way.

Yet the agricultural products of the world have not only never given

out, they have never been brought near a maximum. Food, raiment and

shelter are most varied in kind and abundant in quantity where men are

most numerous. The Algonquin Indian wandered in the forest in the

winter, unfed and unsheltered. The foundation of his trouble was his

indolence and ignorance. The inhabitants of India may perish by famine

in large numbers. The distress arises not from the fact that the

people have outstripped the productive power of the world, but 393

because they have outstripped their wisdom in handling those powers.

Let men covet wealth, and at the same time use narrowly and

competitively the means of attaining it, and the two strata of

society, upper and lower, will shape between them a human life in

which want will stand over against luxury, hatred over against

contempt, and the two classes, oppressed by spiritual destitution and

physical poverty, will wage with each a variable and hopeless warfare

such as wisdom and good will can alone leave behind us.

A first remedy for unemployment is to make employment remunerative; so

remunerative that the workman shall be the buyer of many things as

well as the seller of one thing. When his single sale of labor stands

in equipoise over against his many purchases, we shall have buyers as

well as sellers and our production and traffic will never cease. We

have in trade-unions a first step in the adjustment of exchange.

Workmen strive to escape the competition of the incompetent and

shiftless, to redirect distribution in ways more just and equal, and

by this means to be able to play their own part in economic life more

advantageously for themselves and for all. This effort is new in its

breadth of application, but has never been new with the wise and

thrifty. Personal skill and professional attainments have always

lifted themselves above the storm-swept plain of competition, and

gathered about themselves a prosperity and comfort resting on special

and superior exertion. So long as we subject ourselves to the fortunes

of the indolent and set up our standards of life at the very foot of

the slope, we shall have a competition like that of the Chinese to

contend with. We shall march so near the verge of the precipice that

many will be pushed over it, and the least flurry will be disastrous.

A sufficient return for diligence is the first claim and the

safety of labor; it enhances its motives and fortifies it in the 394

possession of what it holds.

With paucity of pay on the one side goes the superabundance of profits

on the other side. The returns of management should be more moderate,

more uniform, more consonant with the general welfare. We can hardly

doubt that an industrial community, well-organized, with a fair share

of intelligence, diligence and honesty, will commend reasonable

prosperity extending to all its members. Indeed this is what actually

takes place in the midway forms of effort. The very poor and the very

rich complement each other. Healthy and wholesome activity is as

possible to the community as to the individual. The chief difference

lies in the increased complexity of communal action and the ease with

which results are misunderstood and misinterpreted. The instinctive

and voluntary life of the individual is replaced in the community by

divided counsels. Men shape opinion and interpret results in view of

their own interests rather than in view of the public welfare. The

public welfare is as much within the scope of human thought, when

attention is directed to it, as is individual well-being. Indeed the

universal and stable prosperity of economic society is as much

dependent on the diligence and sobriety of its members as is

individual welfare on well-ordered labor. The qualities which enhance

success in the one direction are much the same as those which cause it

in the other direction. Extreme and intemperate action work the same

mischief in the one field as in the other. Society is sufficient unto

itself when its purposes and methods are truly social. A sudden

suspension of labor, a large number out of employment, are the result

of disturbing causes which have found their way into the ordinary

processes of production. These causes are an unreasonable accumulation

of power in single hands, speculative ventures and a social philosophy

which holds in light esteem the immediate interests of the mass of 395

the community. I have in mind a peculiar manufacture which had

provided the needed buildings, and surrounded itself with the homes

and help called for. There came a combination of those engaged in this

industry. The works, comparatively new, were discontinued. Production

sought a new center and the old community was left to suffer the loss

of slow dispersion.

We are protected against theft and criminal violence, but we are not

protected against the unprovoked losses which come to us from the

speculative aims of the adventuresome capitalist, though these losses

may greatly exceed those of robbery. The stability of labor and the

returns of labor are often affected in the great centers of production

by opportunities, fanciful or real, which offer themselves to a few of

achieving large wealth; opportunities not so much of creating wealth

as of raking it together. The mass of men do not so much as conceive

that they have any ground of complaint of operations which sweep out

from under them the supports of well-devised industry. Wealth which in

its making and use tends to break up the ordinary methods of industry,

to throw off the minds of men from the familiar reconciliations of

industry and, above all, to weaken the sense of responsibility which

lies between labor and capital, must, from time to time, issue in

industrial disaster to the confusion and loss of labor. Do the best we

may and we cannot anticipate every disturbance, but we are inexcusable

for overlooking the disasters we bring upon others who are working

with us. Much of what is called enterprise renders those engaged in it

almost wholly negligent of the incidental injuries which fall to those

about them. The equilibrium of labor is dependent on the equilibrium

of productive enterprises, and when these accept no restraints the

disturbance will reappear here and there in the productive world very

much at random. Labor presses at one point and is relaxed at another,

subject to the speculative schemes of capital. Extreme wealth in the

hands of a few lacks the economic and social and moral motives which 396

make it a calculable and reliable means in the hands of many. When it

is in the process of accumulation it is lawless; when it is

accumulated it sinks into indolence.

While some gains are pretty sure to accompany the acquisition of great

wealth, once acquired, it disturbs the even flow of economic forces,

and may easily give rise to irregular occupation that brings serious

disturbance to those whose daily wants are to be supplied by labor. It

may be thought that these fluctuations in production arise from its

very nature, and that if we leave men of very different degrees of

intelligence to contend with each other for the prizes of industry,

great inequalities of prosperity are sure to appear. We can escape

them only by forcing back enterprise and making the moderate, medium

men the standards of achievement. This presentation seems plausible,

and will always be urged by those who are willing or eager to take

large risks. Men of large productive power are easily stimulated, and

their resources are kept, in reference to the community at large, in

the most fruitful form when they are compelled to moderate their

efforts, and are not left to the extreme and eccentric ways normal to

them. The community is interested in habitual lines of industry more

than in those which disturb the minds by sudden profits which cannot

be emulated or repeated. Men will separate themselves from their

fellows in the rivalries of production. Only thus is the power of

intelligence fully disclosed, yet the ordinary arrangements of

society, its privileges and opportunities, should be made as equal as

possible; no unfair advantage should be given to one or another form

of production; nor methods be allowed to the successful in achieving

wealth which are not admissible in the community at large. The laws of

the game should be wisely framed and firmly preserved. It is the able

and ambitious who bring the most strain to safe restrictions, and for

whom they are chiefly made. Equality of opportunity is the cardinal 397

principle, and cannot be sacrificed in favor of enterprise. The

enterprise that is wholesome keeps within this law. It may also be

thought that this rigid restraint would deprive the community of some

of the most prevalent means of welfare as well as of some of the most

illustrious agents in prosperity, and that those great and efficient

combinations which we have come to designate as trusts would be lost

to us; that as the result of this loss we should quickly settle down

into a sluggish routine, mediocre ideas ruling the public mind, and so

miss that very prosperity of which we are in search. Industrial

corporations are most efficient agents in wealth-making. We cannot for

a moment think of throwing any real obstacle in the way of their

formation. But while we need their aid, we should also remember the

evils which are liable to come with them. They are the creatures of

law, and the law in giving birth to them should assign them the form

and restrictions which are most consistent with the public welfare.

They are not to be allowed to fall into speculative hands, an

instrument of unrestrained power.

Industrial corporations afford ready means by which small capital and

moderate men are compacted into a service quite beyond the range of

individual producers. The difficulty has been that much dishonesty has

entered into the formation of corporations, and that unreasonable

power has been exercised by those who have had them in charge. The

responsibility of a corporation to the community, expressed in a sound

financial organization and in the relation of its officers to its

stockholders, would in no way restrain the usefulness of these

industrial agencies, and would make them wholly consistent with

extended and equal opportunities in production. Immense wealth has

often been acquired in connection with corporations whose usefulness

to the public has been thereby restricted and the profits of

stockholders disregarded. Nowhere is the eagerness of personal

enterprise so tempted, nowhere does it display itself more 398

disadvantageously than in the large and oftentimes obscure

undertakings of corporations. It is not in reduction of these

agencies, but in behalf of their safe and profitable use, that the

claim arises for uniform and well-regulated action. In large

corporations, as in insurance companies, when the business itself has

fallen into routine, extravagant salaries have been resorted to as a

means of increasing the returns of officers. Oftentimes the plea for

raising salaries is one which is self-propagating. Expenses have been

greatly enlarged and the remuneration must keep pace with them. Yes,

but will not this very increase lead to increased expenditure?

Industrial corporations have been, in the present generation, a

conspicuous means of production, but they have also conspicuously

promoted a bad distribution of wealth, and so helped to promote

irregularity and ultimate suspension in the productive process. There

may never come a time in which the adventuresome capitalist will not

magnify his own usefulness to the community, but there may come a time

in which men shall see that the wealth of a few may be purchased at

the expense of that general comfort which is the proper return of

industry.

A possible rapidity in the acquisition of wealth inflames the

speculative temper. We mean by the speculative temper, purchase and

sale, not in reference to production but with the hope of making large

profits independently of production. Speculation is an expression of a

venturesome spirit which, in its impatience, lays light emphasis on

the usually slow methods of increase, and promises itself a rapid road

to success. This hope is often disappointed, and when disappointed

carries with it a more or less extended retardation of business. When

the annual losses by bankruptcy in the United States reach

$200,000,000, the distress of those whose means of livelihood have

been involved in this overthrow must become a very sensible factor. 399

Such a sum would, in its successful use, provide for many households.

The temper which goes with sanguine and unscrupulous methods is a

careless, and often a cruel, one. The democratic notion of equality is

overridden, is pushed aside as of no significance in the business

world. The same persons who insist on an open shop, and give free play

to competition when it depresses labor, regarding it as a familiar and

convenient principle in determining wages, may combine with each other

to control products and enhance profits. The general welfare, which is

the controlling idea, is lost sight of or readily forgotten. They have

one standard when they look out on the community at large, and another

standard when they are preparing the way to make and hold fast their

own gains. The directors of business come easily to think that the

welfare of the community is identical with their own welfare, and that

the enterprise with which they sustain their own affairs is identical

with that on which the public prosperity depends. They readily come to

the conclusion that their activity, so essential to the community,

should be cherished by the community. How possibly can production

progress without them. Discrimination in their favor is a short cut to

the common prosperity. Men of comfortable means and the poor even owe

what they have to the enterprise which scatters wealth everywhere.

There is sufficient truth in this feeling, when not too boldly put, to

hide its failures. The expenditures of the very rich in the purchases

and exchanges they involve do carry a measure of advantage to all, but

they also bear with them an unjust distribution, a luxury and a

poverty, which weaken the unity and sap the strength of society. It is

the very gist of democracy that each man shall count one; that in

spite of the diversities and the advantages among men they shall still

remain units of the same value in the freedom and propagating power by

which the gains of the race are stored. It is neither identity nor 400

arbitrary difference that is admissible, but every man and every class

of men carry with them the potentialities, the social and spiritual

possibilities, which are the germs of historic development. This is

the principle with which all petty social distinctions and all civic

tyrannies have been at war.

While, therefore, the evil of monopolies may appear in various forms

and be met in different ways, they cannot be permanently removed

except by social conditions which equalize opportunities and compel

wealth and power, in all their activity, to conform to general safety.

Production in all its forms and in all its agents must be subject to

that temper of fairness, and come under those principles of equal

rights, which bind the parts of the community together, and make them

one producing and one enjoying agency. Every assertion of settled

superiority in persons, classes and races must be set aside, and the

world in its physical, intellectual and spiritual wealth be left open

to all. Thus history has treated men, and is more and more treating

them, in their claims to consideration. This birthright of men is not

to be denied or stolen; for they who steal it have nothing more than

this same birthright to plead in extenuation, the combinations which

look to the defense and extension of these original gifts are in

order, and all combinations which carry them beyond the bounds of

their own territory are another outbreak of anarchy.

The soundness of this assertion has been recently exemplified in the

history of Pittsburg. Pittsburg is the center of an industry which has

come, perhaps more than any other, under the domination of a few

leading men. In the Homestead strike they succeeded in dealing a heavy

blow to workmen in their efforts to secure something like a fair hold

on production. A little inquiry into a community built up for a few

and ordered by them discloses conditions quite at war with general

well-being. Wages are kept down by the constant presence of the

unemployed: the accidents of a dangerous occupation are left to fall 401

upon workmen; the health of the community suffers great neglect, the

remonstrances of workmen are met with the response, If they do not

like the method let them quit; and the general good order and comfort

of citizens receive but little attention. Here is an object lesson in

which work, sure, skilful and unflinching; wealth, eager, unscrupulous

and unsympathetic, have divided the world between them; no right

gained, no power lost. Men may make wealth under these conditions,

withdrawing it from the fitting returns of labor, but they cannot,

wise as they may be or generous as they may seem to be, restore that

wealth to the community in a form in which it will subserve the same

living purpose it might have subserved if it had never been withdrawn.

The life of a community is achieved where its activity is most intense

and constant. Failing in our service at these vital centers, no

extraneous effort will cover our fault. We might as well draw sap from

a tree and then pour it out on its roots.

We have now given three constitutional remedies for the want of

employment. The first is a more equal distribution of the rewards of

production, thus making the demand for products as extended and

uniform as their production. The second is increased restraints,

especially in connection with corporations, in the action of the

leaders of industry, rendering them more amenable to the wants of the

community to which they belong. The third, arising from the other two

and supporting them, is more unity, more harmony between the several

agents of production.

There was a report not long since in England of an industrial

commission, which had given protracted attention to the irregular

demand for labor. The remedies offered were chiefly palliative. It may

be thought that this form of cure is all within our reach; that what

is here offered as constitutional correctives are beyond our power.

There is some truth in the feeling, and would be much truth in it, 402

were not the actions and the sentiments now enforced under urgent

consideration for reasons of public welfare, not directly involved in

unemployment. We cannot expect to remove so grave an evil as this, the

wavering demand for labor, short of some important change in the

organization of society. Society is a structure of so many and such

delicate dependencies that its perfect action must include the general

integrity of the current relations between men. Unwholesome results of

frequent recurrence are the most direct proof of an unsound system.

Palliatives may soften the evil but cannot overcome it. We should aim

immediately to reduce the difficulty and ultimately to remove its

causes.

Business Administration: Theory, Practice and Application. [Vol. 1] Business Economics · 第 77 / 172 题