ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT.

_Monday, February 17th_.--On the motion for the rejection of the

Bill to relieve Ministers from the necessity of re-election, Mr.

PEMBERTON-BILLING incidentally revealed the horrifying fact that

he has compiled another Black Book, containing a full list of the

PRIME MINISTER'S election pledges. They do not quite come up to the

notorious figure of 47,000; but they total 1,211, which seems enough

to go on with, and they are all "cross-referenced."

More serious, from the Government's point of view, was the criticism

of some of their regular supporters. Lord WINTERTON, speaking as an

old Member of the House--though he still looks youthful enough to

be its "baby," as he was fifteen years ago--affirmed the value of

by-elections as a gauge for public opinion; Major GRAEME, one of the

new Coalitionists, thought it would be a mistake to part with a means

of testing the record of a Ministry which the War has "swollen to the

size of a Sanhedrim."

As the soft answers of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL--whom the late Mr.

ROOSEVELT would have probably termed "pussy-footed"--failed to quell

the rising storm, the LEADER OF THE HOUSE bowed before it and offered

to agree to the insertion in the Bill of a time-limit.

[Illustration: Portrait of Winston by MR. MOSELY, a promising young

artist.]

Something had evidently annoyed Mr. DEVLIN. Whether it was the

intimation that the new Housing Bill was not to apply to Ireland

(which has had similar legislation for years past), or that in future

the out-of-work donation in that country would be confined to persons

possessing more or less right to it, or (most probably) that an

interfering Saxon had announced his intention of moving a "Call of the

House" in order to get the recalcitrant Sinn Feiners to take up their

Parliamentary duties, I do not know. At any rate the Nationalist

seized the opportunity of delivering a general attack upon the

Government of such overwhelming irrelevance that Mr. WHITLEY, the

least sarcastic of men, was driven to remark, "I think the honourable

Member is under the impression that this is last week."

[Illustration: GOVERNMENT PROMISES. MR. PEMBERTON BILLING compiles

another Black Book.]

I trust that Mr. CHURCHILL, who is conducting the business of the War

Office in Paris, will not read the Official Report of the debate on

the Aerial Navigation Bill. For I am sure it would be as great a shock

to him as it was to me to learn that Mr. MOSLEY (_ætat_ twenty-two)

considered him, in aviation affairs, as lacking in imagination. The

idea of anyone regarding our WINSTON as a doddering old fossil!

_Tuesday, February 18th_.--As is usual at this period of the Session

the Lords find themselves with nothing to do, and being ineligible

for the out-of-work donation they naturally grumble. Foreman CURZON

endeavoured to pacify them with the promise of one or two little jobs

in the near future; and Lord BUCKMASTER kindly furnished them with

something to go on with by raising the topic of industrial unrest in

a speech composed in about equal measure of admirable platitudes and

highly disputable propositions. Its principal merit was to furnish the

new LORD CHANCELLOR with an occasion for delivering his maiden speech.

This he did with proper solemnity, though once he slipped into his

after-dinner style and addressed his august audience as "My Lords and

Gentlemen." His nearest approach to an epigram was the remark that

"the nation had been living on its capital and liking it." On the

whole he took a hopeful view of the situation--more so than Lord

LANSDOWNE, who expressed "the profoundest dismay" at our increasing

indebtedness. Fortunately His Lordship's gloomy prophecies have not

invariably proved correct.

[Illustration: "JUMPING" A MEMBER'S CLAIM.]

After Question-time in the Commons Mr. BOTTOMLEY made bitter complaint

to the SPEAKER that he had been evicted from his favourite corner-seat

by the Member for South-East St. Pancras. Mr. LOWTHER administered

chilly consolation. Those little _contretemps_ were apt to occur at

the beginning of every new Parliament; and he was not going to lay

down a hard-and-fast rule on the subject before it was necessary.

Old Parliamentarians will remember the long-continued struggle between

Mr. GIBSON BOWLES and a colleague who was always endeavouring to

insert "the thick end of the GEDGE" into "Tommy's" favourite seat.

Mr. HOPKINS is the Member who has jumped Mr. BOTTOMLEY'S claim on the

present occasion--a fact which will recall THEODORE HOOK'S remark that

the game of leap-frog always reminded him of those famous psalmodists,

STERNHOLD and HOPKINS.

_Wednesday, February 19th_.--According to Lord STRATHSPEY there are

thousands of men in the Army longing to take Orders in the Church

Militant, but there are no funds available for training them, and no

prospect of a living wage for them if ordained. The LORD CHANCELLOR'S

sympathetic references to the painful plight of men whose duty it was

to preach content here and hereafter will no doubt be reflected in the

administration of his not inconsiderable patronage. Fortunately or

unfortunately the clergy cannot or will not "down surplices" to

improve their condition.

The unrest in other sections of the working-classes was further

examined from various angles. Lord RIBBLESDALE would like them to

take a greater share in the profits, and also in the "responsibilities

and vicissitudes" of industry. But this suggestion will hardly appeal

to them if, as Lord LEVERHULME declared, Labour would have made a

poor bargain if it had swapped its increased wages for all the excess

profits made during the War. Lord HALDANE'S view, as perhaps you would

expect, was that neither Capital nor Labour, but the "organised mind,"

was the principal agent in producing wealth. Altogether it was an

informing debate, which the Government might do worse than reproduce

in pamphlet form for the instruction of the public.

On the news of the attack on M. CLEMENCEAU reaching the Commons there

was a general desire that the House should pass a resolution of

sympathy. But Mr. BONAR LAW deprecated the proposal as being, in his

opinion, "against all precedent"--not a little to the surprise of some

of the new Members, who thought that in a case like this the _conseil

du précédent_ might bow to the _President du Conseil_.

In the procedure debate a strong demand was made that a full official

report of the speeches delivered in the six Grand Committees should

be issued. But the ATTORNEY-GENERAL pointed out that everything was

already reported "except the talk," and found a powerful supporter in

Sir EDWARD CARSON, who believed that no official reports would have

any effect in keeping Ministers to their pledges. _Hansard_ is as

_Hansard_ does, is his motto.

_Thursday, Feb. 20th_.--Every question put down costs the tax-payer,

it is calculated, a guinea. This afternoon there were no fewer than

two hundred and eighty-two of them on the Order-Paper. It would be

interesting to see what effect upon this cascade of curiosity would

be produced if every Member putting down a question were obliged to

contribute, say, ten shillings to the cost of answering it; the amount

to be deducted from his official salary. If such a rule had been

enforced in the last Parliament Mr. JOSEPH KINO, for one, would have

had no salary to draw.

The shortage of whisky and brandy for medicinal purposes was

the subject of many indignant questions. Mr. MCCURDY, for the

FOOD-CONTROLLER, stated that it had been found impracticable to allot

supplies of spirits for this purpose, but, perhaps wisely, did not

give any reasons. Can it be that the Government, contemplating the

extension of the "all-dry" principle to this country, are anxious to

give no encouragement to the "drug-store habit"?

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, February 26, 1919 · 第 26 / 36 题