FLOATING OF WOOD.

The conveying of wood in floats is an excellent invention; as countries

destitute of that necessary article can be supplied by water carriage,

not only with timber for building and other useful purposes, but also

with fire-wood. The former is either pushed into the water in single

trunks, and suffered to be carried along by the stream, or a number of

planks are ranged close to each other in regular order, bound together

in that manner, and steered down the current as boats are, by people

accustomed to such employment. The first method is that most commonly

used for fire-wood. Above floats of the second kind a load of spars,

deals, laths, pipe-staves, and other timber, is generally placed; and

with these, floaters will trust themselves on broad and rapid rivers,

whereas fire-wood is fit to be transported only on rivulets or small

streams; and sometimes canals are constructed on purpose[1417]. However

simple the invention of floating fire-wood may be, I consider the

other method as the oldest; and I confess that I do not remember to

have found in ancient authors any information respecting the former.

Fire-wood was, indeed, not so scarce formerly in the neighbourhood of

large cities as it is at present. Men established themselves where it

was abundant; and they used it freely, without thinking on the wants

of posterity, till its being exhausted rendered it necessary for them

to import it from distant places. It is probable that the most ancient

mode of constructing vessels for the purpose of navigation gave rise

to the first idea of conveying timber for building in the like manner;

as the earliest ships or boats were nothing else than rafts, or a

collection of beams and planks bound together, over which were placed

deals. By the Greeks they were called _schediai_, and by the Latins

_rates_; and it is known from the testimony of many writers, that the

ancients ventured out to sea with them on piratical expeditions as well

as to carry on commerce; and that after the invention of ships they

were still retained for the transportation of soldiers and of heavy

burthens[1418].

The above conjecture is confirmed by the oldest information to be found

in history respecting the conveyance by water of timber for building.

Solomon entered into a contract with Hiram, king of Tyre, by which the

latter was to cause cedars for the use of the temple to be cut down

on the western side of Mount Lebanon above Tripoli, and to be floated

to Jaffa. The words at least employed by the Hebrew historian, which

occur nowhere else, are understood as alluding to the conveyance of

timber in floats; and this explanation is considered by Michaelis as

probable. At present no streams run from Lebanon to Jerusalem; and the

Jordan, the only river in Palestine that could bear floats, is at a

great distance from the cedar forest. The wood, therefore, must have

been brought along the coast by sea to Jaffa[1419]. In this manner is

the account understood by Josephus; but although he assures us that he

gives the letters of both the kings as they were at that time preserved

in the Jewish and Tyrian annals, it is certain that they are spurious,

and that he took the whole relation from the sacred books of the Jews

which are still extant, as he himself tells us in the beginning of his

work[1420].

An old tradition prevailed that the city Camarina, on the southern

coast of Sicily, was built of the clay or mud which the river Hipparis

carried along with it, and deposited in a lake of the same name. This

account seems to be confirmed by a passage in Pindar, which Aristarchus

quotes in explaining it[1421]; and, according to Bochart, some proof is

afforded also by the name Camarina, as _chamar_ or _chomar_ signifies

sealing-clay[1422]. In this tradition there is nothing improbable. In

the like manner the Egyptians drew up mud from the lake Mœris[1423];

and thus do the Dutch at present fish up in bag-nets the fine mud

or slime which chokes up their rivers, such as the Issel, and which

they employ for various uses. This explanation, however, has not been

adopted by the old commentators of Pindar. Didymus[1424] and others

assert that the poet alludes to wood for building the city being

conveyed in floats on the river Hipparis. But whatever opinion may

be formed of these elucidations of the scholiasts, we have reason to

conclude that the inhabitants of Camarina were much better acquainted

with the floating of wood than with drawing up slime by means of

bag-nets.

The Romans transported by water both timber for building and fire-wood.

When they became acquainted, during their wars against the Germans,

with the benefit of the common larch, they caused large quantities

of it to be carried on the Po to Ravenna from the Alps, particularly

the Rhætian, and to be conveyed also to Rome for their most important

buildings. Vitruvius says[1425] that this timber was so heavy, that,

when alone, the water could not support it, and that it was necessary

to carry it on ships or on rafts. Could it have been brought to Rome

conveniently, says he, it might have been used with great advantage in

building. It appears, however, that this was sometimes done; for we

are told that Tiberius caused the Naumachiarian bridge, constructed by

Augustus, and afterwards burnt, to be rebuilt of larch planks procured

from Rhætia. Among these was a trunk one hundred and twenty feet in

length, which excited the admiration of all Rome[1426].

That the Romans procured fire-wood from Africa, particularly for

the use of the public baths, is proved by the privileges granted

on that account to the masters of ships or rafts by the emperor

Valentinian[1427]. Those who have read the writings of the Latin

authors with attention must have remarked other testimonies; but I have

found no mention in the ancients of floating timber in single planks,

or of canals dug for that purpose; at least as far as I can remember.

In the Latin language also there are scarcely two words that allude

to what concerns the floating of timber; whereas the German contains

more of that kind, perhaps, than are to be found in any other; and I am

thence induced to conjecture that the Germans were the first who formed

establishments for this mode of conveyance on a large scale.

The earliest information respecting the floating of wood in Saxony

appears to be as old as the year 1258[1428], when the margrave Henry

the Illustrious remitted by charter to the monastery of Porta, the

duty collected at Camburg from the wood transported on the river Saale

for the use of the monastery[1429]. It is, however, uncertain whether

wood really conveyed in floats, or transported in boats and lighters,

be here meant. Much clearer information concerning wood floated on the

Saale is contained in a letter, expedited in the year 1410 by the two

brothers Frederic and William, landgraves of Thuringia, and margraves

of Misnia, in which, on account of the scarcity of wood that prevailed

in their territories, they so much lessened the toll usually paid

on the Saale as far as Weissenfels, that a Rhenish florin only was

demanded for floats brought on that river to Jena, and two Rhenish

stivers for those carried to Weissenfels; but the proprietors of the

floats were bound to be answerable for any injury occasioned to the

bridge[1430]. In the year 1431, Hans Munzer, an opulent citizen of

Freyberg, with the assistance of the then burgomasters, put a float

of wood upon the river Mulda, which runs past the city, in order

that it might be conveyed thither for the use of the inhabitants and

of the mines; which seems to be a proof that the floating of timber

was at that period undertaken by private persons, on their own risk

and at their own expenses. In 1486 the floating of wood on the Mulda

by the people of Zwikaw, was opposed by the neighbouring nobility;

but the rights of the city were protected by the electors. When the

town of Aschersleben built its church in the year 1495, the timber

used for the work was transported on the Elbe from Dresden to Acken,

and thence on the Achse to the place of its destination. This is the

oldest account known of floating timber on the Elbe. In the year 1521,

duke George caused a large canal to be cut at the village of Plauen,

which was supplied with water from the Weiseritz, and carried as far

as Dresden. It appears that in 1564 there was a float-master, who was

obliged to give security to the amount of four hundred florins; so that

the business of floating must at that time have been of considerable

importance. Floating of wood was undertaken at Annaberg in 1564, by

George Oeder, one of the members of the council, and established at the

expense of 4000 florins. Of the antiquity of floating in other German

states I know nothing more than what is to be gathered from public

ordinances respecting this object and forests; by which we learn that

in the sixteenth century it was practised in Brandenburg, on the Elbe,

Spree, and Havel; in Bavaria, and in the duchy of Brunswick[1431].

As the city of Paris had consumed all the wood in its neighbourhood,

and as the price of that article became enormous on account of the

distance of forests and the expense of transporting it, John Rouvel,

a citizen and merchant, in the year 1549, fell upon the plan of

conducting wood bound together along rivers which were not navigable

for large vessels. With this view, he made choice of the forests

in the woody district of Morvant, which belonged to the government

of Nivernois; and as several small streams and rivulets had their

sources there, he endeavoured to convey into them as much water as

possible[1432]. That great undertaking, at first laughed at, was

completed by his successor René Arnoul, in 1566. The wood was thrown

into the water in single trunks, and suffered to be driven in that

manner by the current to Crevant, a small town on the river Yonne;

where each timber-merchant drew out his own, which he had previously

marked, and, after it was dry, formed it into floats that were

transported from the Yonne to the Seine, and thence to the capital. By

this method large quantities of timber are conveyed thither at present

from Nivernois and Burgundy, and some also from Franche-Comté. The

French extol highly a beneficial establishment formed by one Sauterau,

in Morvant, at his own expense, by which the transportation of timber

was rendered much more speedy, and for which a small sum was allowed

him from the proprietors of all the wood floated on the Yonne.

The success of this attempt soon gave rise to others. John Tournouer

and Nicholas Gobelin, two timber-merchants, undertook to convey floats

in the like manner on the Marne; and canals were afterwards constructed

in several places for the purpose of forming a communication between

different rivers. The French writers consider the transportation of

large floats, _trains de bois_, like those formed at present, from

the before-mentioned districts, and also from Bourbonnois, Champagne,

Lorraine, Montergis, and other parts of the kingdom, as a great

invention; but I am firmly of opinion that this method was known and

employed in Germany at a much earlier period[1433].

[Victor Hugo gives the following animated account of floating rafts.

The traveller who ascends the river sees it, so to speak, coming

to him, and then the sight is full of charms. At each instant he

meets something which passes him; at one time, a vessel crowded with

peasants, especially if it be Sunday; at another, a steam-boat; then a

long, two-masted vessel, laden with merchandize, its pilot attentive

and serious, its sailors busy, with women seated near the door of the

cabin; here, a heavy-looking boat, dragging two or three after it;

there, a little horse drawing a huge bark, as an ant drags a dead

beetle. Suddenly there is a winding in the river; and formerly, on

turning, an immense raft, a floating house, presented itself, the

oars splashing on both sides. On the ponderous machine were cattle of

all kinds, some bleating, and others bellowing, when they perceived

the heifers peaceably grazing on the banks. The master came and went,

looked at this, then at that, while the sailors busily performed their

respective duties. A whole village seemed to live on this float,--on

this prodigious construction of fir.]

The floating of wood seems, like many other useful establishments, to

have been invented or first undertaken by private persons at their

own risk and expense, with the consent of governments, or at least

without any opposition from them; but, as soon as it was brought to be

useful and profitable, to have been considered among regalia. Hence,

therefore, soon arose the float-regal, which, indeed, on account of the

free use granted of rivers, the many regulations requisite, and its

connexion with the forest-regal, can be sufficiently justified. But

when and where originated the term _jus grutiæ_, under which this regal

is known by jurists?

The few authors who have turned their thoughts to this question have

not been able, as far as I know, to answer it with certainty, nor

even with probability. They have only repeated, without making any

researches themselves, what Stypmann[1434] has said on the subject;

and the latter refers to a passage of Hadrian Junius, which I shall

here more particularly notice. Junius, speaking of the oldest families

in the Netherlands, says that the family of Wassenaer had formerly a

certain supremacy over the rivers in Rhineland, so that no one, without

their permission, could keep swans on them, and that the brewers paid

for the use of the water a certain tax called the _gruyt-geld_, from

which arose the _jus grutæ_. The origin of this word he did not know;

but he conjectured that it was derived either from _gruta_, which

signifies duckweed (_Lemna_), a plant that grows in the water and

covers its surface during the summer, or from _grut_, an ingredient

used in making beer[1435]. It is certain that in the tenth, eleventh,

and thirteenth centuries _gruta_, _grutt_, or _gruit_, signified a tax

which brewers were obliged to pay[1436]; but the origin of the word has

been sufficiently explained neither by Junius nor any other writer. I

nowhere find that it was used in ancient times for a float-duty; and

this meaning Junius himself has not so much as once mentioned.

The word _gruit_ occurs under a quite different sense in a letter of

investiture of the year 1593, by which the elector of Cologne gave as

a fief to the countess of Moers, the _gruit_ within the town of Berg,

with all its rents, revenues, and appurtenances. “No other person was

allowed to put _grudt_ or any plant in beer, or to draw beer brought

from other countries. On the other hand, the countess was to make

good _grutt_, and to cause it to be sold at the price usual in the

neighbouring parts; she was bound also to supply the elector gratis

with what beer was necessary for family consumption; and if more was

required than usual, on extraordinary occasions, she was to ask and

receive money. If any one in the town did not deliver good _gruidt_,

and should prove that he could not deliver better, as the fault was

occasioned by the _gruitte_, the loss that might arise should fall upon

the countess.” The word _grut_ or _gruitt_ seems to occur here under a

double meaning; as an ingredient in the beer, and as the beer itself

which was made from it. Of this difficulty I have in vain endeavoured

to find an explanation. _Grut_, perhaps, may signify malt. In Dutch

and other kindred languages _grut_ means the small refuse which is

separated from anything; and to which _grusch_ bran, and _grütze_

groats, have an affinity. May not ground malt be understood by it? I

have thought likewise of a kind of herb-beer, which was much esteemed

in the sixteenth century; and that _grut_ might signify a mixture of

herbs used for making that beer. It is probable that this word was

confined within the boundaries of the Netherlands; and thence only,

perhaps, is an explanation of it to be expected.

I am, however, still unable to comprehend how the float-duty obtained

the name of _jus grutiæ_; and in our kindred languages I can find no

derivation of it. The German word _flosz_, from _fliessen_, to flow

or glide; _flusz_, a river, occurs in them all. The Dutch say _vlot_,

_vlothout_; the Swedes, _en flott_, _flotta_, to float; _flot-wed_,

float-wood; and the English, _a float_, _to float_, &c.

A History of Inventions, Discoveries, and Origins, Volume 1 (of 2) · 第 114 / 131 题