In the latter department there were,--

In Philosophy proper . . . 18

" Mathematical Sciences . . 19

" Natural " . . 45

" Political Economy, etc. . 10

" History and Geography . . 12

" Aesthetics . . . . 19

" Philology . . . . . 51

But Berlin is by far the most complete university in Germany, however

much it may be surpassed in many points by others. Lesser institutions

do not exhibit half this number of courses, though there are always

enough to satisfy the student who does not devote himself to a narrow

speciality. Private tuition can always be resorted to.

Beside the lectures, there are also occasionally _Seminaren_, mostly

conducted in Latin, where classical or Biblical authors are explained

and read by the students, or where discussions take place, in presence

of a professor, on philosophical, historical, or philological

subjects,--resembling, however, in nothing our debating-societies.

It is only since the middle of the last century that instruction in

the higher branches has been usually carried on in German. Latin was

formerly in general use; it is now seldom made a medium. There is

occasionally a course delivered in English, Italian, or French,--in

Berlin often in one of the Sclavonic languages. Modern Literature and

Philology are by no means extensively cultivated. Lectures on the

Provençal, the Langue d'Oïl, the Old-German, the Cyrillic, are not

uncommon, though but poorly attended. The study of the modern languages

themselves must be pursued with private teachers. A knowledge of these,

as well as a thorough preparatory training in Latin and Greek, is

presupposed. Modern History, on the contrary, has of late years become

an important branch of study. The "Period of Revolutions" is fully

treated every semester, and always draws crowds of students. The spirit

that animates them is the unity of the Fatherland. Classical studies,

though not holding the same undisputed ascendency as in former times,

are yet very actively pursued, embracing Greek and Roman history and

antiquities, comments on classical authors, lectures, critical and

minute in the extreme, where every line is made the subject of

microscopic investigation, and different readings are weighed and

compared, with often an unlimited amount of abuse of editors who have

differed in opinion from the lecturer. The German philologers are not

remarkable for mildness when speaking of each other; and many a one,

as Haupt in Berlin, will enrich his vocabulary with ever-varying,

new-coined epithets to characterize the ridiculousness, tameness, and

stupidity of emendations proposed, and that, too, when speaking of such

men as Orelli and Kirchner, his own colleagues in the profession. A

laugh raised at the expense of a brother is enough to justify the

severest slash. Comparative Philology, which owes its existence

and progress to the labors of German scholars, and whose first

representative, Bopp, is still living and teaching in Berlin, is more

and more pursued of late. Sanscrit is now taught universally; and

lectures are delivered on the affinities of the Indo-Germanic languages

with each other and with the mother-tongue of all. A perceptible

movement is being felt to introduce this study into the preparatory

departments. Such a change would result in a complete revolution of the

methods formerly employed in elementary classical tuition. The higher

laws of affinity, as applied to the Romanic languages, are also daily

more a matter of investigation. Diez and Delius, in Bonn, are at the

head of this movement. In Philosophy, properly so called, the list

of studies is often very full, comprising lectures on Logic, the

Encyclopedia of Science, Metaphysics, Anthropology and Psychology,

Ethics, the Philosophy of Nature, of Law, of History, of Religion, the

History of Philosophy, general and special, and the Philosophy of Art,

or Aesthetics,--the latter general, or branching into specialities, as

Music, Painting, Sculpture, Ancient and Modern Art. Special points are

also treated,--as the Philosophy of Aristotle, of Kant, of Hegel, etc.

Mathematics and the Natural Sciences are not always cultivated to the

same extent as the above-named branches. They are made the subject of

particular attention, however, in the numerous Polytechnic Schools, the

most celebrated being those of Hanover and Carlsruhe. They have risen in

reputation and attendance of late to such a degree, that in the Grand

Duchy of Baden, for instance, a perceptible diminution is felt in

university attendance, while new appropriations have been made for the

enlargement of the Carlsruhe school.

The Theological Faculty ranks the highest, and comprises a wide range of

study. We quote from Dr. Schaff:--

"In modern times the field has been greatly enlarged by the addition

of Oriental Philology, Biblical Criticism, Hermeneutics, Antiquities,

Church-History and Doctrine-History, Homiletics, Catechetics, Liturgies,

Pastoral Theology, and Theory of Church-Government. No theological

faculty is considered complete now which has not separate teachers

for the exegetical, historical, systematic, and practical branches of

divinity. The German professors, however, are not confined to their

respective departments, as is the case in our American seminaries,

but may deliver lectures on any other branch, as far as it does not

interfere with their immediate duties. Schleiermacher, for instance,

taught, at different times, almost every branch of theology and

philosophy."

The Law Department, to which the celebrated school of Bologna served as

a first model, extends over a far wider field than similar institutions

elsewhere. Starting from the Roman Law, it embraces lectures on the

History of Jurisprudence, the Pandects, Civil, Criminal, and Common Law,

and Natural Rights, besides History and Philosophy, as applied to legal

studies,--branching into specialities for German Law and Practice, local

and general. To Americans, of course, only the first part of these

studies would be at all desirable. Moreover, the advantages are not all

of a practical nature.

The Medical Faculty embraces all the studies pursued in our medical

colleges, more specialities being treated,--the time required being

scarcely ever less than five years for the course, often more.

Examinations are severe. The faculties of Berlin, Munich, and Würzburg

are in especial repute,--Vienna also affording many advantages. In some

of the smaller university towns the means of study are limited for

the advanced student, extensive collections and large hospitals being

wanting. Medical studies are attended with more expense than any other.

The _Cameralistische Facultät_ is devoted to those preparing themselves

for practical statesmanship. It is new, and established only of late

years in a few of the universities. In others, the branches taught

are still comprehended under the philosophical. Munich is in especial

repute. It comprises lectures on Political Economy in all its branches,

Mining, Engineering,--in fact, whatever is necessary to fit one for

service in the State.

Let no one, from the above comprehensive list of studies, form the idea,

that the outward incarnation of the German intellect, in speech or deed,

corresponds to its inner worth and solidity. The name _Dryasdust_

must cling to many a learned professor more firmly than to the most

chronological of the old historians. Germany is not the land of outward

form. To one accustomed to public speaking, the lecturers will often

appear far below the standard of mediocrity in their manner. Though such

men as Lasaulx in Munich, Häusser in Heidelberg, Droyson and Werder

in Berlin deliver their lectures in a style that would grace the

lecture-room of any country, yet the great majority are far, very far,

from any eloquence in their delivery. Timid and bashful often to an

extreme, they ascend their rostrum with a shuffling, ambling gait, the

very opposite of manly grace and bearing, and, prefacing their

discourse with the short address, _"Meine Herren"_ keep on in one long,

never-varying, monotonous strain, from beginning to end,--reading wholly

or in part, often so slowly that the hearer can write down _every_ word,

often only the heads and substance of paragraphs, definitions and the

like,--and that so indistinctly, so carelessly of all but the very words

themselves, that it is not only unpleasant, at first, but even repulsive

to many. This dictating of every word, a relic of the times when

printing was yet unknown, is fast dying away. Many, both students and

professors, are loud against it, yet the tedious method is still pursued

in many places. The introductory remark of a celebrated lecturer is

characteristic. Seeing all his hearers, on the first day of the course,

ready with pen and paper, he began,--"Gentlemen, I will not dictate: if

that were necessary, I should send my maid-servant with my manuscript,

and you yours with pen and paper; my servant would dictate, yours would

write, and we in the mean while could enjoy a pleasant walk." This

is, however, not the only point that will be likely to produce an

unfavorable impression. To see a man whose name you have met in your

reading as the highest authority, whose works you have so often admired,

his style energetic, fiery, and impressive,--to see him ascend his

rostrum with every mark of negligence, uncouth and awkward in his

appearance, with every possible mannerism, talking through his nose,

indistinctly and unsteadily mumbling over his sentences, careless of all

outward form and polish, awakens anything but pleasant feelings, as the

preconceived ideal must give way to the living reality. And yet so it is

with many!

It may have contributed not a little to the reputation of Göttingen and

Heidelberg with foreigners, that a good and clear German is spoken in

both places by the professors. In Tübingen, on the contrary, even in

Munich, to a great extent, the local dialect prevails to such a degree,

that students from Northern Germany, many of whom frequent these cities

in the summer session, find it difficult, nay, almost impossible, to

understand at first, especially the broad Suabian of Tübingen. Here,

however, as the system of dictation prevails, the slowness of utterance

compensates in a measure for its indistinctness and incorrectness.

In some places, where academic freedom, as the students style it, exists

to a high degree, a general scraping of the feet admonishes the lecturer

to repeat his words or be more distinct and clear in his enunciation.

This pedal language, though often disregarded, still does not fail in

the end in producing the desired effect.

With such characteristics, it cannot be a matter of wonder, if some

time be required to be spent in hearing lectures daily before the full

benefit can be fairly appreciated. Many will appear slow in the extreme;

and the constant recourse to notes, and the tedious manner, will create

a feeling of weariness hard to overcome. However, these peculiarities

are soon forgotten in the excellence of the matter, and their

disagreeableness is scarcely noticed after a few weeks, except in

extreme cases. The mannerism fades away, and the hearer learns to follow

from thought to thought under the guidance of an experienced leader,

whose living words he hears, whose thought he feels as it is

communicated directly to him.

Not so much from the actual things heard, the actual facts mastered, is

the lecture-system valuable to the student, as for the method of

study which he derives from it. He is no longer like an automaton, a

school-boy guided by his teacher and text-book, but is spoken to as an

independent thinker. Authorities are quoted, which he may consult at his

leisure. No subject is exhausted,--it is only touched upon. He learns to

teach himself.

Far different is the mental training thus acquired from that gained in

the same amount of time spent in mere reading. Thought is stimulated to

a far greater degree. The lecture-room becomes a laboratory, where the

mind of the hearer, in immediate contact with that of a man mature in

the ways of study, of one whose whole life seems to have prepared him

for the present hour, assimilates to itself more than knowledge. The

lecturer gives what no books can give, his own force to impel his own

words. His mind is ever active while he speaks. The hearer feels its

workings, and his own is stirred into action by the contact. It is

not given to all to enjoy the conversation and intercourse of the

master-minds of the age: in the lecture-room they speak to us

immediately; we feel the current of their life-blood; it pulsates

through all they say.

That seeming exceptions may occur, as in the case of professors who year

after year deliver the same written course, can have no weight against

the system. The tone and gesture, the very look, must animate the

whole;--and these very written lectures, read and delivered so often,

are no dead stalk, but a living stem, which puts forth new leaves and

blossoms every spring.

Nor is the hearer himself without his corresponding influence. His

attention and eager desire for knowledge stimulate new thought in the

speaker day by day, hour by hour; and many a German scholar must have

felt with Friedrich August Wolf, when he says,--"I am one who has been

long accustomed to the gentle charm which lies in the momentaneous

unfolding of thought in the presence of attentive hearers, to that

living reaction softly felt by the teacher, whereby a perennial mental

harmony is awakened in his soul, which far surpasses the labors in the

study, before blank walls and the feelingless paper."

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 07, No. 41, March, 1861 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 6 / 37 题