TRADITIONS.

There was even a tradition that America was visited by St. Columba,[13]

and also by the Apostle St. Thomas,[14] who penetrated even as far as

Peru. This opinion is founded on the resemblance existing between

certain rites and doctrines which _seem_ to have been held in common by

Christians and the early inhabitants of Mexico. The first Spanish

missionaries were surprised to find the Mexicans bowing in adoration

before the figure of the cross, and inferred that these people were of a

Christian origin. Yet the inference has no special value, when we

remember that Christianity is far less ancient than the symbol of the

cross, which also existed among the Egyptians and other ancient people.

Claims have also been made for the Irish. Broughton brings forward a

passage in which St. Patrick is represented as sending missionaries to

the Isles of America.[15] Another claim has been urged of a more

respectable character, which is supported by striking, though not

conclusive allusions in the chronicles of the North, in which a distant

land is spoken of as "Ireland the Great." The Irish, in the early times,

might easily have passed over to the Western continent, for which voyage

they undoubtedly had the facilities. And Professor Rafn, after alluding

to the well known fact that the Northmen were preceded in Iceland by the

Irish, says, that it is by no means improbable that the Irish should

also have anticipated them in America. The Irish were a sea-faring

people, and have been assigned a Phenician origin by Moore and others

who have examined the subject.[16] If this is so, the tradition would

appear to be some what strengthened. Even as early as the year 296, the

Irish are said to have invaded Denmark with a large fleet. In 396, Niall

made a descent upon the coast of Lancashire with a considerable navy,

where he was met by the Roman, Stilicho, whose achievements were

celebrated by Claudian in the days of the Roman occupation of England.

At that period the Irish were in most respects in advance of the

Northmen, not yet having fallen into decline, and quite as likely as any

people then existing to brave the dangers of an ocean voyage.[17] The

Icelandic documents, possibly referring to the Irish, will be given in

their proper place, and in the meanwhile it need only to be added that

the quotation given by Beamish from such an authority as the _Turkish

Spy_ will hardly tend to strengthen their claims, especially where its

author, John Paul Marana, says that in Mexico "the British language is

so prevalent," that "the very towns, bridges, beasts, birds, rivers,

hills, etc., are called by the British or Welch[18] names."[19] In

truth, as the wish is so often father to the thought, it would be an

easy task to find resemblance in the languages of the aborigines to

almost any language that is spoken in our day.

But notwithstanding the _probabilities_ of the case, we have no solid

reason for accepting any of these alleged voyages as facts. Much labor

has been given to the subject, yet the early history of the American

continent is still veiled in mystery, and not until near the close of

the tenth century of the present era can we point to a genuine

trans-Atlantic voyage.

The Pre-Columbian Discovery of America by the Northmen Illustrated by Translations from Icelandic Sagas · 第 23 / 71 题