NATURE AND MOTIVES OF GHOSTS.

“In the most high and palmy state of Rome,

A little ere the mightiest Julius fell,

The graves stood tenantless, and the sheeted dead

Did squeak and gibber in the Roman streets.”

HAMLET, 4to. B.

ASTR. It is not from the sources of _mythology_ alone, that I adduce my

illustrations of the reality of ghosts, but from the myriads of

_incidents_ which ancient and modern _history_ record. Yet may I well

crave your courtesy for the scraps of fable, and perchance of imposture,

that may unwittingly creep into my discourse. Listen to me.

It was believed by the ancients that each body possessed three

ghosts—to be released on its dissolution. The _manes_ at once emigrated

to the region of Pluto: the _spiritus_ ascended to the skies: the

_umbra_ or shade still wandered on the earth. Or, as the poet has more

comprehensively sung,

“Bis duo sunt homini, manes, caro, spiritus, umbra;

Quatuor ista loci bis duo suscipiunt:

Terra tegit carnem, tumulum circumvolat umbra,

Orcus habet manes, spiritus astra petit.”

Meaning that there are four principles in man, and this is their

destiny:—the _flesh_ to earth; the _ghost_ to the tomb; the _soul_ to

Hades; and the _spirit_ to heaven.

The queen of Carthage, confiding in this creed, threatens Æneas that her

umbra will haunt him upon earth, while her manes will rejoice in his

torments.

The notions of other mystic scholars are thus recorded by old Burton, in

his “Anatomy of Melancholy:” as those of Surius—“that there be certain

monsters of hell and places appointed for the punishment of men’s souls,

as at Hecla in Iceland, where the ghosts of dead men are familiarly

seen, and sometimes talk with the living. Saint Gregory, Durand, and the

rest of the schoolmen, derive as much from Ætna in Sicily, Lipara,

Hiera—and those volcanoes in America, and that fearful mount Heckleberg

in Norway, where lamentable screeches and howlings are continually

heard, which strike a terror to the auditors: fiery chariots are

continually seen to bring in the souls of men in the likeness of crows,

and devils ordinarily goe in and out.” And then, to bring this phantasy

to a climax by a pandemonium of ghosts, listen to Bredenbachius, in his

“Perigranions in the Holy Land,” where “once a yeare dead bodies arise

about March, and walk, and after awhile hide themselves again: thousands

of people come yearly to see them.” And this reminds me of the phantom

of old Booty, who at the hour of his death in England was seen by the

crew of a ship running into the crater of Stromboli in the remote

Mediterranean,—a story which even in the present century was made the

subject of discussion in a justice court.

Now, you must know, the ancients believed that only those who died of

the sword possessed this privilege.

These are the words of Flavius Josephus: “What man of virtue is there

that does not know that those souls which are severed from their fleshly

bodies in battles by the sword are received by the ether, that purest of

elements, and joined to that company which are placed among the

stars:—that they become good demons and propitious heroes, and shew

themselves as such to their posterity afterwards; while upon those souls

that wear away in and with their distempered bodies, comes a

subterranean night to dissolve them to nothing, and a deep oblivion to

take away all the remembrance of them? And this, notwithstanding they be

clean from all spots and defilements of this world; so that in this case

the soul at the same time comes to the utmost bounds of its life, and of

its body, and of its memorial also.”

The mystery of the nature of these ghosts I may not presume to define;

but there are many learned writers of antiquity who believed in their

_materiality_, and broached the intricate question of their quality and

formation.

The alchymist Paracelsus writes of the _astral element_ or _spirit_—one

of the two bodies which compose our nature: being more ethereal, it

survived some time after the death of the more substantial form, and

sometimes became the familiar spirit of the magician. And what writes

Lucretius the Epicurean to illustrate his credence in apparitions? That

the surfaces of bodies are constantly thrown off by a sort of

centrifugal force; that an exact image is often presented to us by this

surface coming off as it were entire, like the cast skin of the

rattle-snake or the shell of the chrysalis; and thus the ideas of our

absent or departed friends _strike_ on the mind.

The olden chymists, in the age of Louis XIV. accounted for spectral

forms by the saline atoms of a putrid corpse being set free, and

combining again in their pristine form. Listen, I pray you, to this

grave philosophy of an abstruse essay, writ in 1794.

“The apparitions of souls departed do, by the virtue of their formative

plastic power, frame unto themselves the vehicles in which they appear

out of the moisture of their bodies. So ghosts do often appear in

church-yards, and that but for a short time, to wit, before the moisture

is wholly dried up.”

“Such are those thick and gloomy shadows damp,

Oft seen in charnel-vaults and sepulchres,

Lingering and sitting by a new-made grave.”

And we read in the chronicles, that “during the time the ancients

_burned_, not _buried_ their dead, there was no such appearance of

ghosts as is now.”

Why waves the coarse grass ranker over the grave? It is touched by the

larva of the rotting carcase, which, ascending from its putrid

chrysalis, a butterfly, or Psyche, flits awhile like an ephemera, and

drops again into the vault.

A sentiment something like this, I believe, was the grand cause of the

enrolment of the mummies by the Egyptians; for they thought while the

body remained entire, the soul was flitting about it: and the early

Christians even believed that a portion at least of the soul remained,

uncorrupted by the body.

Evelyn will grant that among the Romans there was a devout wish to be

buried near venerated beings and saints, an _emanation_ from whose

bodies, they believed, would inspire the hearts of the believers.

And here I will relate a story from the Dinan Journal of 1840, and also

the fragment of a very mysterious tale told with all the solemnity of a

faithful chronicle.

“We had the curious spectacle of a long procession of girls from

Pleudiheus, passing through our streets to the chapel of Saint Anne, to

offer up prayers for the repose of the soul of the mother of one of

them, who has been dead twenty-two years, and who every five years has

appeared to her daughter, urging her to have masses said for her. This

time the troubled spirit prescribed the day, hour, and place of the

service, and even the precise dresses she would have the votaries wear.

Consequently, they were all lightly clothed in white, although the rain

fell and the streets were full of mud.—Some of the inhabitants of Dinan

affirm that they saw the ghost of the deceased, marching at the head of

the procession to the door of the chapel, where it remained till the

mass was finished, and then suddenly vanished.”

Returning from the harbour to Cadiz with some Spanish doñas, the Baron

Geramb heard a voice in French, crying, “Save me! Help, help!” but at

the time he took little or no heed of the matter. On the morrow was seen

on the shore of the harbour a body on a black board, with lighted tapers

by its side, which was covered by the Baron’s direction. During a

tempest in the evening, some secret impulse directed him again to the

shore. Before his bewildered sight arose from the spot a shapeless

phantom wrapped in the black winding-sheet which he had provided.

The phantom moved along with gigantic strides, assuming a globular form,

and then, whirling in spiral circles, bounded off, and appeared at a

distance like a giant. The spectre led the Baron to the streets of

Cadiz, its course being accompanied by a noise as of the tinkling of

autumnal leaves. In Cadiz a door suddenly opened with force, and the

spectre rushed like lightning into the house, and plunged into the

cellar. There was the sound of deep groaning, and the Baron descended

into the vault: there lay the corpse naked and livid, and on it was

prostrated an aged man, uttering the deep sighs of abject misery and

despair. In a gloomy corner of this cave of death leaned the phantom,

revolving in its spiral whirls, and then changing to a floating cloud of

light; and then there beamed forth the pale features of a youth,

undulating as if on the bosom of a wave, which murmured in the ear. Then

came the chaunting of anthems and prayers for the dead, and a glittering

young girl in white robes glided into the cellar, and knelt in devotion

by the body.

The phantom—and so the legend proceeds.

There is a wondrous mystery, I grant, enveloping this story; but if

there be any truth in that alchymic re-animation, _Palingenesy_—

“If chemists from a rose’s ashes,

Can raise the rose itself in glasses;”

nay, if the sparkling diamond shines forth from a mass of charcoal, why

may not the ashes of a body be made into a ghost, illustrative of the

philosophy of substantial apparitions, adopted by Kircher,—a body

_rebuilt_, after being resolved, for a time, into its constituent

elements? The Parisian alchymists of the seventeenth century, indeed,

demonstrated this mystery, and raised a phœnix from its ashes. They

submitted to the process of distillation some earth from the cemetery of

the Innocents; during which ceremony, they were scared by the appearance

of perfect human shapes, struggling in the glass vessels they were

employing. And, lastly, Dr. Ferriar thus deposes:—A ruffian was

executed, his body dissected, and his skull pulverised by an anatomist.

The student, who slept in the chamber of experiment, saw, in the

night-time, a progressive getting together of the fragments, until the

criminal became perfect, and glided out at the door.

And here is a legend of deeper mystery still.

There was a merry party collected in a town in France, and amongst all

the gay lords and ladies there assembled, there was none who caused so

great a sensation as a beautiful young lady, who danced, played, and

sang in the most exquisite style. There were only two unaccountable

circumstances belonging to her: one was, that she never went to church

or attended family prayers; the other, that she always wore a slender,

black velvet band or girdle round her waist. She was often asked about

these peculiarities, but she always evaded the interrogatories; and

still, by her amiable manners and beauty won all hearts. One evening, in

a dance, her partner saw an opportunity of pulling the loop of her

little black girdle behind: it fell to the ground, and immediately the

lady became pale as a sheet; then, gradually shrunk and shrunk, till at

length nothing was to be seen in her place but a small heap of grey

ashes.

And what think you now, Evelyn?

EV. I think your candle burned very blue, Astrophel, when you were

poring over these midnight legends; yet, I believe, I may, by and by,

explain the story of your Lady of the Ashes;—all, excepting the mystery

of the sable girdle. But, methinks, you should not have stopped short of

the qualities by which we may recognise the _genus_ of these phantoms.

There was once, as I have heard, a ghost near Cirencester, which

vanished in a very nice perfume, and a melodious twang; and Master

Lilly, therefore, concluded it to be a fairy: and Propertius, I know,

writes of another; and he decided, that the scent diffused on her

disappearance, proclaimed her to be a goddess! Glanville has set himself

to argue upon, nay, demonstrate, all questions regarding materiality and

immateriality, and the nature of spirits; puzzling us with mathematical

diagrams, and occupying fifteen chapters on the nature of the witch of

Endor: and Andrew Moreton, too, in his “Secrets,” comments, with

pedantic profanation, on the “infernal _paw-wawing_ of this condemned

creature.” Coleridge, and even Sir Walter, who had a mighty love of

legends, propose a question, whether she was a ventriloquist or an

aristocratic fortune-teller, or an astrologer or a gipsy, imposing on

the credulity of Saul. And yet that same Sir Walter very shrewdly

suggested to Sir William Gell the _manufacture_ of a ghost, with a thin

sheet of tin, painted white, so that by half a turn the spectre would

instantly vanish.

CAST. A ghost, I believe, according to the rules of phantasy, ought to

be without matter or form, or indeed any sensible properties. Yet are

very serious tales related of guns bursting when fired at them, and

swords broken by their contact, and of loud voices issuing from filmy

phantoms through which the moonbeams are seen to glimmer. A spirit

ought, of course, to communicate with us in another way than that which

we know, and possess those ethereal faculties of creeping through chinks

or keyholes, and of resuming its airy form, like the sylph of Belinda,

when the “glittering forfex” had cut it in twain. An exquisite morceau

of such a phantom just now flits across my memory. It is of two old

ladies dwelling in two border castles in Scotland. One of these dames

was visited by the spectre _bust_ of a man; and the other by the _lower

half_ of him. Which had the better bargain, I know not, but I believe—

ASTR. Nay, it were not difficult, lady, to overwhelm me with tales like

yours—the idle and unmeaning gossip of a winter’s night: but there are

many spectral visitations so intimately associated with events, that the

faculty even of prophecy cannot be doubted. Bodine, as Burton writes, is

fully satisfied that “these souls of men departed, _if_ corporeal, are

of some shape, and that absolutely round, like sun and moone, because

that is the most perfect form: that they can assume other aërial bodies,

all manner of shapes at their pleasure, appear in what likeness they

will themselves: that they are most swift in motion, can pass many miles

in an instant, and so likewise transform bodies of others into what form

they please, and, with admirable celerity, remove them from place to

place: that they can represent castles in the ayre, armies, spectrums,

prodigies, and such strange objects to mortal men’s eyes; cause smells,

savors, deceive all the senses; foretel future events, and do many

strange miracles.”

Then the eccentric Francis Grose has thus summed up many of their

wondrous attributes:—

“The spirit of a person deceased is either commissioned to return for

some especial errand, such as the discovery of a murder, to procure

restitution of lands, or money unjustly withheld from an orphan or

widow: or, having committed some injustice whilst living, cannot rest

till that is redressed. Sometimes the occasion of spirits revisiting

this world is to inform their heir in what secret place or private

drawer in an old trunk they had hid the title-deeds of the estate, or

where, in troublesome times, they had buried the money and plate. Some

ghosts of murdered persons, whose bodies have been secretly buried,

cannot be at ease till their bones have been taken up and deposited in

sacred ground, with all the rites of Christian burial.” The ghost of

Hamlet’s father walked on the platform at Elsineur, to incite his son to

revenge his murder; and many modern phantoms have enlivened the legends

of our local histories, bent on the same mysterious errand.

The mythology of the ancients, and the fairy superstition of our own

land, are also replete with legends of these apparitions. The rites of

sepulture were essential for the repose of the manes. If the body was

not quietly entombed, the soul was wandering on the banks of Styx for

one hundred years, ere it was permitted Charon to ferry it across the

river. Thus spoke the shade of Patroclus to Achilles, in his dream:

“Thou sleep’st, Achilles, and Patroclus, erst

Thy best belov’d, in death forgotten lies.

Haste, give me burial: I would pass the gates

Of Hades, for the shadows of the dead

Now drive me from their fellowship afar.”

And this is a prevailing sentiment among the North American Indians:

“The bones of our countrymen lie uncovered, their bloody bed has not

been washed clean, their spirits cry against us,—they must be

appeased.”

In the letter of Pliny the Consul, to Sura, we learn that there was at

Athens a house haunted by a chain-rattling ghost. Athenodorus, the

philosopher, hired the house, determined to quiet the restless spirit.

“When it grew towards evening, he ordered a couch to be prepared for him

in the fore part of the house, and, after calling for a light, together

with his pencil and tablets, he directed all his people to retire. The

first part of the night passed in usual silence, when at length the

chains began to rattle. However he neither lifted up his eyes, nor laid

down his pencil, but diverted his observation by pursuing his studies

with greater earnestness. The noise increased, and advanced nearer, till

it seemed at the door, and at last in the chamber. He looked up and saw

the ghost exactly in the manner it had been described to him—it stood

before him beckoning with the finger. Athenodorus made a sign with his

hand that it should wait a little, and threw his eyes again upon his

papers; but the ghost, still rattling his chains in his ears, he looked

up and saw him beckoning him as before. Upon this he immediately arose,

and, with the light in his hand, followed it. The spectre slowly stalked

along as if encumbered with his chains, and, turning into the area of

the house, suddenly vanished. Athenodorus, being thus deserted, made a

mark with some grass and leaves where the spirit left him. The next day

he gave information to the magistrates, and advised them to order that

spot to be dug up. This was accordingly done, and the skeleton of a man

in chains was there found; for the body having lain a considerable time

in the ground, was putrified, and had mouldered away from the fetters.

The bones, being collected together, were publicly buried; and thus,

after the ghost was appeased by the proper ceremonies, the house was

haunted no more.”

Yet, not only to entreat the rites of sepulture, the phantom will walk

according to some law of those beings remote from the fellowship of

human nature,—it may be to obtain readmission to that earth from which

it was, by some fairy spell, in exile.

In the wilds of Rob Roy’s country, there is many a Highlander believing

still the traditions of the Daoine Shi, or Men of Peace: and among the

legends of Aberfoyle there is one phantom tale that is apropos to my

illustrations.

There was one Master Robert Kirke. He was one evening taking his night

walk on a fairy hill, or dunshi, in the vicinity of his manse. On a

sudden he fell to the ground, struck, as it appeared to many, by

apoplexy: the seers, however, believed it to be a trance inflicted on

him by the fairy people for thus invading the sacred bounds of their

kingdom. After the interment, the phantom of the minister appeared to

one of his relatives, and desired him to go to Grahame of Duchray, his

cousin, and assure him that he was not dead, but was at that time a

prisoner in elf land, and the only moment in which the fairy charm could

be dissolved, was at the christening of his posthumous child. The

counter-spell was this: that Grahame should be present at the baptism,

holding a dish in his hand, and that when the infant was brought, he

should throw the dish over the phantom; the appearance of which at that

moment was faithfully promised.

When the child was at the font, and while the guests were seated, the

apparition sat with them at the table; but fear came upon the Græme at

this strange glamourie: he forgot the solemn injunction, and it is

believed that Mr. Kirke, to this day, “drees his weird in fairy land.”

The Philosophy of Mystery · 第 17 / 72 题