The more internal harmony and aversion, or friendship and enmity

(for superstition and folly have rendered the terms of sympathy and

antipathy almost disgusting), have been either falsely assigned,

or mixed with fable, or most rarely discovered from neglect. For if

one were to allege that there is an enmity between the vine and the

cabbage, because they will not come up well when sown together, there

is a sufficient reason for it in the succulent and absorbent nature

of each plant, so that the one defrauds the other. Again, if one were

to say that there is a harmony and friendship between the corn and

the corn-flower, or the wild poppy, because the latter seldom grow

anywhere but in cultivated soils, he ought rather to say, there is an

enmity between them, for the poppy and the corn-flower are produced and

created by those juices which the corn has left and rejected, so that

the sowing of the corn prepares the ground for their production. And

there are a vast number of similar false assertions. As for fables,

they must be totally exterminated. There remains, then, but a scanty

supply of such species of harmony as has borne the test of experiment,

such as that between the magnet and iron, gold and quicksilver, and

the like. In chemical experiments on metals, however, there are some

others worthy of notice, but the greatest abundance (where the whole

are so few in numbers) is discovered in certain medicines, which,

from their occult and specific qualities (as they are termed), affect

particular limbs, humors, diseases, or constitutions. Nor should we

omit the harmony between the motion and phenomena of the moon, and

their effects on lower bodies, which may be brought together by an

accurate and honest selection from the experiments of agriculture,

navigation, and medicine, or of other sciences. By as much as these

general instances, however, of more latent harmony, are rare, with

so much the more diligence are they to be inquired after, through

tradition, and faithful and honest reports, but without rashness

and credulity, with an anxious and, as it were, hesitating degree of

reliance. There remains one species of harmony which, though simple in

its mode of action, is yet most valuable in its use, and must by no

means be omitted, but rather diligently investigated. It is the ready

or difficult coition or union of bodies in composition, or simple

juxtaposition. For some bodies readily and willingly mix, and are

incorporated, others tardily and perversely; thus powders mix best with

water, chalk and ashes with oils, and the like. Nor are these instances

of readiness and aversion to mixture to be alone collected, but others,

also, of the collocation, distribution, and digestion of the parts when

mingled, and the predominance after the mixture is complete.

7. Lastly, there remains the seventh, and last of the seven, modes

of action; namely, that by the alternation and interchange of the

other six; but of this, it will not be the right time to offer any

examples, until some deeper investigation shall have taken place of

each of the others. The series, or chain of this alternation, in its

mode of application to separate effects, is no less powerful in its

operation than difficult to be traced. But men are possessed with the

most extreme impatience, both of such inquiries, and their practical

application, although it be the clew of the labyrinth in all greater

works. Thus far of the generally useful instances.

LI. The twenty-seventh and last place we will assign to the magical

instances, a term which we apply to those where the matter or efficient

agent is scanty or small, in comparison with the grandeur of the work

or effect produced; so that even when common they appear miraculous,

some at first sight, others even upon more attentive observation.

Nature, however, of herself, supplies these but sparingly. What she

will do when her whole store is thrown open, and after the discovery

of forms, processes, and conformation, will appear hereafter. As far

as we can yet conjecture, these magic effects are produced in three

ways, either by self-multiplication, as in fire, and the poisons termed

specific, and the motions transferred and multiplied from wheel to

wheel; or by the excitement, or, as it were, invitation of another

substance, as in the magnet, which excites innumerable needles without

losing or diminishing its power; and again in leaven, and the like; or

by the excess of rapidity of one species of motion over another, as

has been observed in the case of gunpowder, cannon, and mines. The two

former require an investigation of harmonies, the latter of a measure

of motion. Whether there be any mode of changing bodies _per minima_

(as it is termed), and transferring the delicate conformations of

matter, which is of importance in all transformations of bodies, so as

to enable art to effect, in a short time, that which nature works out

by divers expedients, is a point of which we have as yet no indication.

But, as we aspire to the extremest and highest results in that which is

solid and true, so do we ever detest, and, as far as in us lies, expel

all that is empty and vain.

LII. Let this suffice as to the respective dignity of prerogatives of

instances. But it must be noted, that in this our organ, we treat of

logic, and not of philosophy. Seeing, however, that our logic instructs

and informs the understanding, in order that it may not, with the small

hooks, as it were, of the mind, catch at, and grasp mere abstractions,

but rather actually penetrate nature, and discover the properties and

effects of bodies, and the determinate laws of their substance (so

that this science of ours springs from the nature of things, as well as

from that of the mind); it is not to be wondered at, if it have been

continually interspersed and illustrated with natural observations and

experiments, as instances of our method. The prerogative instances are,

as appears from what has preceded, twenty-seven in number, and are

termed, solitary instances, migrating instances, conspicuous instances,

clandestine instances, constitutive instances, similar instances,

singular instances, deviating instances, bordering instances,

instances of power, accompanying and hostile instances, subjunctive

instances, instances of alliance, instances of the cross, instances

of divorce, instances of the gate, citing instances, instances of the

road, supplementary instances, lancing instances, instances of the

rod, instances of the course, doses of nature, wrestling instances,

suggesting instances, generally useful instances, and magical

instances. The advantage, by which these instances excel the more

ordinary, regards specifically either theory or practice, or both. With

regard to theory, they assist either the senses or the understanding;

the senses, as in the five instances of the lamp; the understanding,

either by expediting the exclusive mode of arriving at the form, as in

solitary instances, or by confining, and more immediately indicating

the affirmative, as in the migrating, conspicuous, accompanying, and

subjunctive instances; or by elevating the understanding, and leading

it to general and common natures, and that either immediately, as in

the clandestine and singular instances, and those of alliance; or very

nearly so, as in the constitutive; or still less so, as in the similar

instances; or by correcting the understanding of its habits, as in

the deviating instances; or by leading to the grand form or fabric of

the universe, as in the bordering instances; or by guarding it from

false forms and causes, as in those of the cross and of divorce. With

regard to practice, they either point it out, or measure, or elevate

it. They point it out, either by showing where we must commence in

order not to repeat the labors of others, as in the instances of power;

or by inducing us to aspire to that which may be possible, as in the

suggesting instances; the four mathematical instances measure it. The

generally useful and the magical elevate it.

Again, out of these twenty-seven instances, some must be collected

immediately, without waiting for a particular investigation of

properties. Such are the similar, singular, deviating, and bordering

instances, those of power, and of the gate, and suggesting, generally

useful, and magical instances; for these either assist and cure

the understanding and senses, or furnish our general practice. The

remainder are to be collected when we finish our synoptical tables for

the work of the interpreter, upon any particular nature; for these

instances, honored and gifted with such prerogatives, are like the

soul amid the vulgar crowd of instances, and (as we from the first

observed) a few of them are worth a multitude of the others. When,

therefore, we are forming our tables they must be searched out with the

greatest zeal, and placed in the table. And, since mention must be made

of them in what follows, a treatise upon their nature has necessarily

been prefixed. We must next, however, proceed to the supports and

corrections of induction, and thence to concretes, the latent process,

and latent conformations, and the other matters, which we have

enumerated in their order in the twenty-first aphorism, in order that,

like good and faithful guardians, we may yield up their fortune to

mankind upon the emancipation and majority of their understanding;

from which must necessarily follow an improvement of their estate, and

an increase of their power over nature. For man, by the fall, lost

at once his state of innocence, and his empire over creation, both

of which can be partially recovered even in this life, the first by

religion and faith, the second by the arts and sciences. For creation

did not become entirely and utterly rebellious by the curse, but in

consequence of the Divine decree, “in the sweat of thy brow shalt

thou eat bread,” she is compelled by our labors (not assuredly by our

disputes or magical ceremonies), at length, to afford mankind in some

degree his bread, that is to say, to supply man’s daily wants.

END OF “NOVUM ORGANUM”

FOOTNOTES

[71] Τὸ τὶ ἦν εἶναι, or ἦν οὐσία of Aristotle.--See lib. iii. Metap.

[72] These divisions are from Aristotle’s Metaphysics, where they are

termed, 1. ὓλη ἢ τὸ ὑποκείμενον. 2. τὸ τὶ ἦν εἶναι. 3. ὅθεν ἡ ἀρχὴ τῆς

κινήσεως. 4. τὸ οὗ ἕνεκεν--καὶ τὸ ἀγαθόν.

[73] See Aphorism li. and second paragraph of Aphorism lxv. in the

first book.

[74] Bacon means, that although there exist in nature only

individualities, yet a certain number of these may have common

properties, and be controlled by the same laws. Now, these homogeneous

qualities which distinguish them from other individuals, lead us to

class them under one expression, and sometimes under a single term. Yet

these classes are only pure conceptions in Bacon’s opinion, and cannot

be taken for distinct substances. He evidently here aims a blow at the

Realists, who concluded that the essence which united individualities

in a class was the only real and immutable existence in nature,

inasmuch as it entered into their ideas of individual substances as

a distinct and essential property, and continued in the mind as the

mold, type or pattern of the class, while its individual forms were

undergoing perpetual renovation and decay.--_Ed._

[75] Bacon’s definition is obscure. All the idea we have of a law of

nature consists in invariable sequence between certain classes of

phenomena; but this cannot be the complete sense attached by Bacon to

the term form, as he employs it in the fourth aphorism as convertible

with the nature of any object; and again, in the first aphorism, as

the _natura naturans_, or general law or condition in any substance

or quality--_natura naturata_--which is whatever its form is, or that

particular combination of forces which impresses a certain nature upon

matter subject to its influence. Thus, in the Newtonian sense, the

form of whiteness would be that combination of the seven primitive

rays of light which give rise to that color. In combination with this

word, and affording a still further insight into its meaning, we have

the phrases, _latens processus ad formam, et latens schematismus

corporum_. Now, the _latens schematismus_ signifies the internal

texture, structure, or configuration of bodies, or the result of the

respective situation of all the parts of a body; while the _latens

processus ad formam_ points out the gradation of movements which takes

place among the molecula of bodies when they either conserve or change

their figure. Hence we may consider the form of any quality in body

as something convertible with that quality, _i.e._, when it exists

the quality is present, and _vice versâ_. In this sense, the form of

a thing differs only from its efficient cause in being permanent,

whereas we apply cause to that which exists in order of time. The

_latens processus_ and _latens schematismus_ are subordinate to form,

as concrete exemplifications of its essence. The former is the secret

and invisible process by which change is effected, and involves the

principle since called the law of continuity. Thus, the succession of

events between the application of the match to the expulsion of the

bullet is an instance of latent progress which we can now trace with

some degree of accuracy. It also more directly refers to the operation

by which one form or condition of being is induced upon another. For

example, when the surface of iron becomes rusty, or when water is

converted into steam, some change has taken place, or latent process

from one form to another. Mechanics afford many exemplifications of

the first latent process we have denoted, and chemistry of the second.

The _latens schematismus_ is that visible structure of bodies on

which so many of their properties depend. When we inquire into the

constitution of crystals, and into the internal structure of plants, we

are examining into their latent schematism.--_Ed._

[76] By the recent discoveries in electric magnetism, copper wires,

or, indeed, wires of any metal, may be transformed into magnets; the

magnetic law, or form, having been to that extent discovered.

[77] Haller has pursued this investigation in his “Physiology,”

and has left his successors little else to do than repeat his

discoveries.--_Ed._

[78] Bacon here first seems pregnant with the important development of

the higher calculus, which, in the hands of Newton and Descartes, was

to effect as great a revolution in philosophy as his method.--_Ed._

[79] By spirit, Bacon here plainly implies material fluid too fine to

be grasped by the unassisted sense, which rather operates than reasons.

We sometimes adopt the same mode of expression, as in the words spirits

of nitre, spirits of wine. Some such agency has been assumed by nearly

all the modern physicists, a few of whom, along with Bacon, would leave

us to gather from their expressions, that they believe such bodies

endowed with the sentient powers of perception. As another specimen

of his sentiment on this subject, we may refer to a paragraph on the

decomposition of compounds, in his essay on death, beginning--“The

spirit which exists in all living bodies, keeps all the parts in due

subjection; when it escapes, the body decomposes, or the similar parts

unite.”--_Ed._

[80] The theory of the Epicureans and others. The atoms are supposed

to be invisible, unalterable particles, endued with all the properties

of the given body, and forming that body by their union. They must

be separated, of course, which either takes a vacuum for granted, or

introduces a tertium quid into the composition of the body.

[81] Compare the three following aphorisms with the last three chapters

of the third book of the “De Augmentis Scientiarum.”

[82] Bacon gives this unfortunate term its proper signification; μετα,

in composition, with the Greeks signifying change or mutation. Most of

our readers, no doubt, are aware that the obtrusion of this word into

technical philosophy was purely capricious, and is of no older date

than the publication of Aristotle’s works by Andronicus of Rhodes, one

of the learned men into whose hands the manuscripts of that philosopher

fell, after they were brought by Sylla from Athens to Rome. To fourteen

books in these MSS. with no distinguishing title, Andronicus is said to

have prefixed the words τα μετα τα φυσικα, to denote the place which

they ought to hold either in the order of Aristotle’s arrangement, or

in that of study. These books treat first of those subjects which are

common to matter and mind; secondly, of things separate from matter,

_i.e._ of God, and of the subordinate spirits, which were supposed by

the Peripatetics to watch over particular portions of the universe. The

followers of Aristotle accepted the whimsical title of Andronicus, and

in their usual manner allowed a word to unite things into one science

which were plainly heterogeneous. Their error was adopted by the

Peripatetics of the Christian Church. The schoolmen added to the notion

of ontology, the science of the mind, or pneumatology, and as that

genus of being has since become extinct with the schools, metaphysics

thus in modern parlance comes to be synonymous with psychology. It were

to be wished that Bacon’s definition of the term had been accepted, and

mental science delivered from one of the greatest monstrosities in its

nomenclature, yet Bacon whimsically enough in his De Augmentis includes

mathematics in metaphysics.--_Ed._

[83]

“Ne tenues pluviæ, rapidive potentia solis

Acrior, aut Boreæ penetrabile frigus adurat.”

--Virg. Georg. i. 92, 93.

[84] This notion, which he repeats again, and particularizes in the

18th aph. of this book, is borrowed from the ancients, and we need not

say is as wise as their other astronomical conjectures. The sun also

approaches stars quite as large in other quarters of the zodiac, when

it looks down upon the earth through the murky clouds of winter. When

that luminary is in Leo, the heat of the earth is certainly greater

than at any other period, but this arises from the accumulation of heat

after the solstice, for the same reason that the maximum heat of the

day is at two o’clock instead of noon.--_Ed._

[85] Bouguer, employed by Louis XIV. in philosophical researches,

ascended the Andes to discover the globular form of the earth, and

published an account of his passage, which verifies the statement of

Bacon.

[86] Montanari asserts in his book against the astrologers that he

had satisfied himself by numerous and oft-repeated experiments, that

the lunar rays gathered to a focus produced a sensible degree of

heat. Muschenbröck, however, adopts the opposite opinion, and asserts

that himself, De la Hire, Villet, and Tschirnhausen had tried with

that view the strongest burning-glasses in vain. (Opera de Igne.) De

la Lande makes a similar confession in his Astronomy (vol. ii. vii.

§ 1413). Bouguer, whom we have just quoted, demonstrated that the

light of the moon was 300,000 degrees less than that of the sun; it

would consequently be necessary to invent a glass with an absorbing

power 300,000 degrees greater than those ordinarily in use, to try the

experiment Bacon speaks of.--_Ed._

[87] In this thermometer, mercury was not dilated by heat or contracted

by cold, as the one now in use, but a mass of air employed instead,

which filled the cavity of the bulb. This being placed in an inverted

position to ours, that is to say, with the bulb uppermost, pressed

down the liquor when the air became dilated by heat, as ours press

it upward; and when the heat diminished, the liquor rose to occupy

the place vacated by the air, as the one now in use descends. It

consequently was liable to be affected by a change in the temperature,

as by the weight of air, and could afford only a rude standard of

accuracy in scientific investigations. This thermometer was not Bacon’s

own contrivance, as is commonly supposed, but that of Drebbel.--_Ed._

[88] La Lande is indignant that the Chaldeans should have more correct

notions of the nature of comets than the modern physicists, and charges

Bacon with entertaining the idea that they were the mere effects of

vapor and heat. This passage, with two others more positive, in the

“De Aug.” (cap. xl.) and the “Descript. Globi Intellect.” (cap. vi.)

certainly afford ground for the assertion; but if Bacon erred, he erred

with Galileo, and with the foremost spirits of the times. It is true

that Pythagoras and Seneca had asserted their belief in the solidity

of these bodies, but the wide dominion which Aristotle subsequently

exercised, threw their opinions into the shade, and made the opposite

doctrine everywhere paramount.--_Ed._

[89] Was it a silk apron which exhibited electric sparks? Silk was then

scarce.

[90] The Italian fire-fly.

[91] This last is found to be the real reason, air not being a good

conductor, and therefore not allowing the escape of heat. The confined

air is disengaged when these substances are placed under an exhausted

receiver.

[92] This is erroneous. Air, in fact, is one of the worst, and metals

are the best conductors of heat.

[93] See No. 28 in the table of the degrees of heat.

[94] Bacon here mistakes sensation confined to ourselves for an

internal property of distinct substances. Metals are denser than wood,

and our bodies consequently coming into contact with more particles of

matter when we touch them, lose a greater quantity of heat than in the

case of lighter substances.--_Ed._

[95] This was the ancient opinion, but the moderns incline to the

belief that these insects are produced by generation or fecundity

from seeds deposited by their tribes in bodies on the verge of

putrefaction.--_Ed._

[96] The correct measure of the activity of flame may be obtained by

multiplying its natural force into the square of its velocity. On this

account the flame of vivid lightning mentioned in No. 23 contains so

much vigor, its velocity being greater than that arising from other

heat.--_Ed._

[97] The fires supply fresh heat, the water has only a certain quantity

of heat, which being diffused over a fresh supply of cooler water, must

be on the whole lowered.

[98] If condensation were the cause of the greater heat, Bacon

concludes the centre of the flame would be the hotter part, and _vice

versâ_. The fact is, neither of the causes assigned by Bacon is the

true one; for the fire burns more quickly only because the draught of

air is more rapid, the cold dense air pressing rapidly into the heated

room and toward the chimney.--_Ed._

[99] Bacon appears to have confounded combustibility and fusibility

with susceptibility of heat; for though the metals will certainly

neither dissolve as soon as ice or butter, nor be consumed as soon

as wood, that only shows that different degrees of heat are required

to produce similar effects on different bodies; but metals much more

readily acquire and transmit the same degree of heat than any of the

above substances. The rapid transmission renders them generally cold

to the touch. The convenience of fixing wooden handles to vessels

containing hot water illustrates these observations.

[100] Another singular error, the truth being, that solid bodies are

the best conductors; but of course where heat is diffused over a large

mass, it is less in each part, than if that part alone absorbed the

whole quantum of heat.--_Ed._

[101] This general law or form has been well illustrated by Newton’s

discovery of the decomposition of colors.

[102] _I.e._, the common link or form which connects the various

kinds of natures, such as the different hot or red natures enumerated

above.--See Aphorism iii. part 2.

[103] This is erroneous--all metals expand considerably when heated.

[104] “Quid ipsum,” the τὸ τὶ ἦν εἶναι of Aristotle.

[105] To show the error of the text, we need only mention the case

of water, which, when confined in corked vases, and exposed to the

action of a freezing atmosphere, is sure to swell out and break those

vessels which are not sufficiently large to contain its expanded

volume. Megalotti narrates a hundred other instances of a similar

character.--_Ed._

[106] Bacon’s inquisition into the nature of heat, as an example of

the mode of interpreting nature, cannot be looked upon otherwise than

as a complete failure. Though the exact nature of this phenomenon is

still an obscure and controverted matter, the science of thermotics

now consists of many important truths, and to none of these truths is

there so much as an approximation in Bacon’s process. The steps by

which this science really advanced were the discovery of a measure of

a heat or temperature, the establishment of the laws of conduction and

radiation, of the laws of specific heat, latent heat, and the like.

Such advances have led to Ampère’s hypothesis, that heat consists in

the vibrations of an imponderable fluid; and to Laplace’s theory, that

temperature consists in the internal radiation of a similar medium.

These hypotheses cannot yet be said to be even probable, but at least

they are so modified as to include some of the preceding laws which

are firmly established, whereas Bacon’s “form,” or true definition of

heat, as stated in the text, includes no laws of phenomena, explains no

process, and is indeed itself an example of illicit generalization.

In all the details of his example of heat he is unfortunate. He

includes in his collection of instances, the _hot_ tastes of aromatic

plants, the caustic effects of acids, and many other facts which

cannot be ascribed to heat without a studious laxity in the use of the

word.--_Ed._

Novum organum · 第 20 / 22 段